Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Removing the
Main Barrier to • 15 years managing
projects - chemicals/
Improvement process
• 10 years in procurement
– chemicals, pharma,
on capital & construction
• 10 years management
construction consulting –
projects procurement & supply
chain
• Now independent
3
Why the lack of collaboration is the
Collaboration main driver of poor productivity
4
Collaboration
Collaborative teams deliver
better results
• They need less ‘policing’
• Are more creative
• Waste less
• Are more fun and less
stressful to be a member of
Collaboration
• Those of us in the UK are aware that Latham, Egan,
etc al have been saying this for years
Collaboration
+25% Profit
• In the USA the CII found +30%
these results over 20 Satisfaction
years ago
-10% Cost
• And more recently, in -20% Time
2015, the University of -65% Changes
Minnesota looked at 59
collaborative project -83% Claims
10
And it isn't just a tiny issue
• McKinsey have identified collaboration one of their
major enablers of productivity improvement
• But these are not independent improvement
opportunities that you can pick-and-mix
• Collaboration – or the lack of it underpins many of the
other opportunities. It is a PREREQUISITE for many of
the other value-enhancing methods.
• Meaning its impact is MUCH MORE than the 6-7% from
27-38% implied in this report
11
Levers for productivity improvement
Main Categories Saving Levers
Regulation
Collaboration & 6 Time & cost reduction from
Contracting process & admin
Design & 8 Value Engineering, Constructability, Repeatable & Early involvement. Reduced
Engineering standardised design, “Production System”, Tighter waste – design for bidding
integration with contractors
Procurement & 4 Consolidation, Digitisation, Category Management, Coordinated logistics
SCM Planning & transparency
Highlight => Work much better in a collaborative project team & lack of collaboration seriously inhibits their power 12
It doesn’t look like we have got it right!
90% of projects
overrun their
budgets at an
In 3500 projects average rate of
drawn from all over 28% [2002]
the world in several
different industries,
[cost] overruns are
the norm, being
typically between 40
and 200 per cent.
[1987]
14
Procurement - The Main Barrier
• The common forms of contract used on capital and construction
projects are inherently un-collaborative in nature
• Fixed Prices, GMP, and associated penalties for breach
• I can win, you can lose
• Very high risk to suppliers
• Add to the overall cost
• Waste time because they take longer to agree, and for change to be managed
• Incentivises conservatism and behind-the-scenes cost cutting
• Reimbursable or basic cost-plus
• Incentivises suppliers to increase billings
• Penalises suppliers who uncover savings and improvements
• Adding a “Partnership Charter” over the top of other contract terms
adds a potential conflict
• But it is possible, with luck and senior-level support
Removing the commercial barriers to
collaboration
• This is BOTH
• A form of contract
• A philosophy or mindset
17
What is an Alliance?
What I’m not talking about…
• A legal organisational structure
• PPP style formal joint ventures (SPV)
• Supply chain JV’s
• Long-term, multi-project, agreement or framework
• A “let’s be nice and things will work out” partnership
charter, added to a traditional contract
19
A Project Alliance/IPD
A few key features
• Exists for a single project.
• A multi-party contract (usually).
• Removes the obstacles to team-wide collaboration.
• Aligns the commercial interests of the client and supply members
• Win together, Lose together
• Consensus, unanimous, decision making
• Limited ability for members to claim & litigate
• A “relational contract”, based on principals rather than detailed
obligations.
• Team selected early, based on competence.
• Though still selected competitively.
• Works collaboratively with whole supply chain.
• Focus & resources on the problem/opportunity.
• Not on the contractual relationships between team members
A Project Alliance/IPD
Traditional Contracting A Project Alliance
Client Client
Advisors
Project Alliance (IPD) Team
Member Member
Main 1 4
Contractor Member Member
2 3
Sub-
Sub-
Sub-
contractors
contractors
contractors Sub-
Sub-
Sub-
contractors
contractors
contractors
Shared risk/reward Traditional Contracts
Sub-sub-
Sub-
Sub- Sub-sub-
Sub-
Sub-
contractors
contractors
contractors contractors
contractors
contractors
Collaboration on a Project
Case Study: The “Fix 7” Project
Project Alliance Case Study: Fix-7
Project Alliance
3-company contract
Reduced waste & “policing”
Difficult Goals
Client Traditional Client
Approach Alliance Contract
EPCM
EP CM
Construct
Sub-
Sub- Suppliers
Suppliers contractors
contractors
Integrated Project Team
Project Alliance Case Study: Fix-7
• 3-party contract: Client | Engineer &Procure | Construct
• 4 week selection for $10M construction work
• RFP was 3 pages
• Payment using CFV method
• Cost + Fixed Fee + Variable Fee
Contin.y
VF 2
VF 1
VF 2 Safety … 30%
VF 1 Shutdown … 25%
FF 2
Not to scale!
FF 1
Constr
FF 2 Schedule … 15%
Salaries FF 1 Cost … 20%
Cost Behaviour … 10%
EPCM 3rd Parties
24
Performance Fee Breakdown
• Variable Fee – “Profit at Risk” = £300,000 total
• Co.1: £200,000 67%
• Co.2: £100,000 33%
Behaviours
Aesthetics
LCC/TCO
Income/Profit/ROI Efficiency 27
You can get complicated with the
performance fees
• My recommendations
• Keep it “as simple as possible, but not simpler”
• DON’T make the Variable Fee payment dependant upon
savings
29
A Project Alliance/IPD
• A single contract binding the client and • Commercial obstacles to collaboration
one or more of the main project suppliers are removed
• Meaning usually it is a multi-party contract • CFV (Cost-Fixed-Variable) payment
mechanism that ensures team
• A relational contract with high-level members’ commercial interests align
mutual commitments with the project client’s.
• Work together to achieve the agreed
project objectives. • There will be a learning curve
• Manage the project well. • Simply because it is different
• Collective responsibility, with much less (or • You may need to change corporate
no) importance to who did what. “No processes, or at least get an exemption
Blame”. • But it isn’t hard to do: Some will be able
• Collaborative decision making to read a book and do it. You can learn
on-line and on-the-job, or use a part-
• Disputes are resolved by the alliance as time coach
much as possible. “No Claim”.
• Risks are either retained by the client, or
collectively managed and shared by the
alliance.
Planning Selection Contract Deliver
33
Governance Structures
Dispute Resolution Independent 3rd
Body party
Steering Committee
Alliance Board
Facilitation Support
(technical & team)
Management Team
Project Team
Timing – when to choose the alliance
members
Business Concept Detailed
Build
Case Design Design
Detailed Design
Build - Construction
+30%
Satisfaction
-10% Cost
-20% Time
-65% Changes
-83% Claims
-99.8% LTA
37
The Alliance/IPD is just the start!
If gives you a great foundation
38
You get some benefit from the
alliance itself
Team
• BUT
• There is no reason project alliances cant work on all types of
projects, in all environments, and at all scales
• The potential benefits are significant
42
How you implement this?
• Just give it a go
• Find out more yourself
• Read case studies, and freely available guidance
• Go on a training course
• ….if you can find one, and if it suits
• Get specialists to support your project
• Lawyers
• Alliance Facilitators
43
Get support to learn how to implement
a Project Alliance/IPD
• The full programme will launch in April 2018
• Opportunity to join the PILOT from January 2018
• 6 Module Development Programme
• The Pilot will include
• Live presentations – about 8-10 hours
• Live group coaching & discussion – about 10-12 hours
• Preparation materials – to read or watch
• Ability to shape the content
• 2 x 1-hour coaching sessions
• Lifetime access to the full programme, with updates.
• Videos, Discussions, Templates, Workbooks, Guidelines & Checklists 44
Modules 1-3
1: Introduction 2: Preparation 3: Selection
47
Do you want to join us?
• There will be a maximum of 15 places on the pilot programme
• It will start on Tuesday 9 January
• Timing of the live sessions will suit the locations of members
• Everything will be recorded
• It will cost £1470 to join the pilot
• Or 4 months @ £430
• 45% saving on the full price of the programme & coaching
51
The Project Alliance &
IPD – Integrated Project Delivery
academy.ianheptinstall.com
52
53
Project Alliances & IPD
The key to improving the performance of
capital & construction projects.
FASTER | CHEAPER | LOWER RISK
56
Join my FREE webinar to learn why using Project
Alliance (or IPD) contracts is such a powerful way
to improve project performance.
57
58