Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Teacher professionalism, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment are elements that add to
the value and quality of the Australian education system in terms of both teaching and
experiences. Through analysing and exploring each element one will endeavour to explain
the importance of each in relation to the daily work of Australian teachers. One will
highlight how the interrelationship of these elements play a part in addressing the specific
needs of gifted and talented students in Australian classrooms and how as teachers
curriculum, pedagogy and assessment may be modified to better meet the needs of all
students. The specific learning needs of gifted and talented students will become apparent
as well as ways in which teachers must modify their practices and strategies to cater to the
Pedagogy is not necessarily exclusively the act of teaching. Pedagogy can be more
broadly understood as the ‘relationship between teaching and learning and how together
understanding’ (Corrigan, Buntting, Jones and Gunstone, 2013, p.1). Pedagogy also refers
experiences’ (Corrigan, et al, 2013, p.1). Quality Teaching is a model that encourages
exemplary pedagogy and learning in the classroom. The Quality Teaching Model was
students despite their race or socio-economic background (Gore, 2007, p. 15). Teachers
are able to engage with the quality teaching model designed to improve the quality of
teachers pedagogical strategies and abilities and thus, improve all students educational
outcomes (Gore, 2007, p.16). The Quality Teaching model has three dimensions namely
intellectual quality, quality learning environment and significance. Each of these three
1
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
dimensions need to be at play simultaneously in order for the model to be effective (Gore,
2007). With its three dimensions, the Quality Teaching method ensures that students
complete all tasks in a deep and meaningful manner (Gore, 2007), as the model has been
designed on the premise that all teachers have the ability to deliver engaging and quality
lessons.
Curriculum is a valued element of education in Australia and ‘refers to the study of any
and all educational phenomena’ (Egan, 1978, p.71). Curriculum includes learning
achievement (Egan, 1978, p.65). According to The Australian Curriculum, Assessment and
Reporting Authority (2016) the Australian curriculum ‘sets the expectations for what all
young Australians should be taught, regardless of where they live in Australia or their
plays a major role in the everyday expectations and work of teachers and students.
Teachers are required to provide engaging and relevant lessons and assessments that
comply with the expectations of the curriculum in order to provide students with quality
that teachers individual beliefs and knowledge can influence how they interpret and
implement the curriculum when designing lessons (Corrigan, 2013). The Australian
monitor and evaluate the curriculum (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting
2
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
Assessment is another essential tool for teachers that monitors students across a range of
areas. It is deeply embedded in the pedagogical aspect of teaching and learning in the
informal and can assist the teacher in determining the educational level of the students.
Assessment also enables teachers to understand how to best support their students in the
future and allows teachers to provide relevant, targeted and individualised feedback to
their students. Assessments set the standard that students are expected to reach
(Corrigan, 2013) and can be undertaken at a classroom level, a school level or at a state
level. One of the ways that assessment is able to be understood is through the
implementation of the NSW NAPLAN test that students undertake in primary and high
school. NAPLAN is an Australian wide test which is developed and implemented by the
Australian Curriculum Assessment, and Reporting Authority (2016) and ‘covers all the
school systems, that is, private, independent, public, faith-based and alternative. The data
is utilised and operationalised in a variety of ways within those systems’ (Johnston, 2017,
p. 19) It tests all students in year three, five, seven and nine in the areas of reading,
writing, spelling, grammar and numeracy (Ford, 2011) and allows teachers to understand
constantly being defined and redefined through educational theory, policy and
practise’ (2008 p. 53) and ensures that teachers ‘demonstrate respect and professionalism
in their interactions with students, colleagues, parents/carers and the community’ (Hilferty,
2011, p.4). Teacher professionalism demonstrates a teachers ability to meet the needs of
both the students and their parents in order to communicate effectively in relation to
student learning. According to the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership
3
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
Teachers is broken down into seven standards which are grouped into three domains:
knowledge ensures that teachers know the students and how they learn, and know the
content and how to teach it. Professional practice refers to the planning and implementing
of effective teaching and learning, creating and maintaining supportive and safe learning
environments and allows teachers to assess, provide feedback and report on student
learning and engage professionally with colleagues, parents, carers and the community
(Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2011). Each of the seven
standards has specific focus areas to provide increased understanding of the expectations
of each domain. They are further divided into Descriptors at four professional career
stages: graduate, proficient, highly accomplished and lead (Australian Institute for
student. However, throughout this exploration one will determine how the interrelationship
of these aspects addresses the learning needs of gifted and talented students in the
Australian education system and how the teacher may need to differentiate these in order
to meet the needs of this group of students. According to the Australian curriculum (2014)
gifted and talented students are often associated with high academic achievement which
can vary from student to student. The objectives of the Australian curriculum are the same
for all students, however, the learning needs for gifted and talented students may differ
dramatically from other students as they are likely to make progress towards education
outcomes at a faster pace than other students (Australian Curriculum, 2014). Gifted and
talented students are also able to perform and achieve learning outcomes at an
4
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
outstanding level and are capable of higher performance than other students (Rowley,
learning needs gifted and talented students may require altered learning programs beyond
those designed for the average student. This is necessary to meet their high individual
strengths and talents in accelerated academic proficiency. (Weinfield, et al, 2002). For
The recognition of a student as gifted and or talented does not automatically guarantee
high educational outcomes and there is a clear impact on educational outcomes when the
needs of gifted and talented students are not met. This is described by Sangeeta (2008-9)
embody characteristics such as these that is will have a negative impact on their learning
Gifted underachieving is often a result of social and emotional factors such as lack of trust,
fear of failure, fear of success and low academic self-efficacy (Sangeets 2008-9). It is
essential that teachers recognise underachievers in order to prevent students from falling
behind. Teachers must develop and employ pedagogical strategies and referring to the
Australian Professional Standards for Teaching will allow them to build a relationship with
their students which in turn encourages them to become engaged in curriculum and
assessments. In order for teachers to prevent underachievers they can engage with the
learn and how to create and maintain a safe and supportive learning environment
5
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
Teachers play a major role in meeting the needs of gifted and talented students. An
inclusive teacher who is aware of the needs of their gifted and talented students
understands and accepts that it is their role to employ quality curriculum, pedagogy, and
meet the needs of their gifted and talented students (Pearce, Gray, Campbell-Evens,
2009). For example, teachers must provide explicit instructions, regular feedback, monitor
outcomes and revise work on a level that coincides with their students learning ability
(Pearce, et al, 2009). In order to fully cater for gifted and talented students through
provides them with the skills to adequately provide for the students particular needs
(Rowley, 2012). Gifted and talented students also require a ‘differentiated curriculum that
responds to these students academic and socio-affective needs’ (Rowley, 2012, p.75) and
it is the teachers role to provide and design a specialised curriculum that is structured
around the gifted and talented student’s unique range of academic abilities, particularly
when gifted and talented students are educated within the regular classroom setting
(Rowley, 2012). The teachers role when educating gifted and talented students requires
high energy levels, and flexibility as they may need to change the direction of their lesson.
It is also important that they devote extra time and effort to their teaching in order to
provide value and quality lessons for their students (Rowley, 2012).
In order for teachers to meet the expectations of their teaching role to the best of their
ability they must engage with the Australian Professional Standards for teaching. This will
allow them to understand the importance of identifying and planning for the learning needs
of their students, understand how their students learn and be able to differentiate their
teaching strategies to meet the specific learning needs across the full range of abilities in
6
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
their class (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2011). In order for
teachers to develop these abilities they must know their students and how they work.
Aligning pedagogy, assessment and curriculum that is coherent, has a purpose that is
recognisable and supports students learning needs is essential (Hayes 2003). Hayes
assessment’ (Hayes, 2003, p.234). However, she gives one example of a learning task
where the interrelationship between the three areas are evident. The assessment was
designed around specific outcomes from the Australian curriculum that reflected the
students abilities. The assessment generated the classroom activity and an assessment
grid was provided to the students. The assessment grid highlights the translation of the
curriculum into pedagogy through assessment (Hayes, 2003) and thus highlights the
future development of their curriculum, pedagogy and assessment strategies they may use
results from prior assessments such as NAPLAN to ensure their practices are meeting the
standards of their students. Using the results of assessment may also enable teachers to
provide a higher level of feedback to students in order to assist them in their future
It is apparent that teacher professionalism, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment are all
significant in education and as a future educator it is essential that one should understand
that it is their role to employ these to a satisfactory standard in the classroom. In order to
engage in effective curriculum, pedagogy and assessment one must have a full
understanding of the quality teaching model, the Australian curriculum which is designed
well as being aware of the benefits and different types of assessment and how state wide
exams such as the NAPLAN can be used as a tool to provide feedback to students and to
7
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
help design pedagogy and curriculum for future educating. It is the interrelation of these
terms and how they are designed, implemented and modified that caters for gifted and
talented students.
8
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
Reference
Australian Curriculum. (2014) Who are Gifted and Talented Students? Student Diversity.
Retrieved from. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/studentdiversity/who-are-
gifted-and-talented-students.
Australian Institute For Teaching and School Leadership. (2011) Australian Professional
Standards for teachers. Retrieved from. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/
apst-resources/australian_professional_standard_for_teachers_final.pdf
Corrigan, D., Gunstone, R. F., & Jones, A. (2013). Valuing assessment in science
education pedagogy, curriculum, policy. New York: Springer.
Ford, M. (2013). Achievement gaps in Australia: what NAPLAN reveals about education
inequality in Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16, 80-102, doi:
10.1080/13613324.2011.645570
Gore, J. (2007). Improving Pedagogy. The challenges of moving teachers toward higher
levels of quality teaching. In Butcher & McDonald (Eds.), Making a difference:
Challenges for teachers, teaching, and teacher education (pp.15-33). Rotterdamn,
The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Hilferty, F. (2008). Teacher professionalism and cultural diversity: Skills, knowledge and
values for a changing Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35, 53-70.
doi:10.1007/BF03246289.
Johnston, J. (2017). Australian NAPLAN testing: In what ways is this a ‘wicked’ problem?.
Improving Schools. 20(1), 18-34. doi:
10r.g1/107.171/1773/61536458408201261667733170
Pearce, M., Gray, J., & Campbell-Evens, G. (2009). The Inclusive Secondary Teacher: The
Leader’s Perspective. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(6), 101-108.
Rowley, J. (2012). Professional development needs of teachers to identify and cater for
gifted students. Australian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(2), 75-80.
9
Hannah Rose 18215452 Assessment 1 DTL
Weinfeld, R., Barnes‐Robinson, L., Jeweler, S., & Shevitz B. (2002) Academic programs
for gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 24(4), 226-233.
doi: 10.1080/02783190209554185.
10