Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Blake Bishop
HDFS 205
Media Reflection
3/28/2018
The “princess in distress” is a trope far older than the Walt Disney Company, but it is
nonetheless one that Disney has certainly made its own through its many animated films. From
Disney’s first feature film, Snow White, to Tarzan, its last entry in the twentieth century, not a
single lead female was without need of saving. It is especially interesting that this salvation
came, without exception, at the hands of a man. Even in animal-led films such as The Aristocats,
the lead female, a cat named Duchess, needs the help of a strong, scrappy male cat to help rescue
her and her kittens from certain death. Even in films where the heroine provides assistance to the
male lead, [i.e. Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast] their assistance is always in iconically feminine
form.
For example, in Beauty and the Beast, the heroine Belle is able to save the Beast by
showing him kindness and good manners; of course she also falls in love with him, reversing a
witch’s spell and turning him back into a human. Essentially, Belle, though she is the lead of the
film, is only able to provide help through subservience, positivity, and love. Meanwhile in the
realm of physicality, she is completely helpless. When she tries to escape the Beast’s
confinement, she is quickly set upon by wolves. Of course, the Beast quickly intervenes and
saves precious, powerless Belle’s life, which leads us to a scene of Belle playing Clara Barton
Men, on the other hand, generally fail to follow any harsh stereotypes aside from that of
playing the savior. Unlike Disney’s female characters, there is quite a lot of diversity in the male
character spectrum. Men play harsh villains, strong and caring do-gooders, gentle giants, witty
detectives, distressed teens, and daring heroes, among many others. They generally show more
character development over the course of their respective movies, increasing their understanding
and empathic tendencies while learning to better provide for others’ needs. Though the idea of
being the “prince” that every girl dreams of can certainly be harmful, the most outright
stereotyping of male tendencies in Disney films is the trope of refusing to ask for directions, as
In the most basic sense, Disney’s female characters through the end of the twentieth
century were helpless, clueless, and devoid of any true agency separate from their need for “true
love.” Even when women are empowered in films such as Mulan, there is a strong expectation
and delivery of male attention, as if saving and entire country is simply not enough for a heroine
to accomplish. Essentially, she must bring home a man. This is true of most all of Disney’s
films of the 1900s; Ariel leaves her family and marries a prince, Snow White and Sleeping
Beauty both end up with a prince who kissed them when they were basically dead, [out of
gratitude I suppose?] Cinderella marries a man who is unable to remember her face, and Jane
chooses to abandon her family and country, living without shelter in the jungle because a gorilla-
man showed her the ways of nature. Of course, with the high level of Disney’s film output, the
Other Stereotypes
Though the broad topic is addressed in the documentary Mickey Mouse Monopoly, the
ravens in Dumbo are certainly one of the most vivid and outright obvious examples of Disney’s
attitudes towards “popular” racism. Though all the crows spoke as African-American men, the
racist ideologies of the characters go far beyond that easily-noticed detail. Their dress and
actions are explicit mimicry of the African American caricatures of the time, and Disney went as
far as to name the leader of the crows “Jim Crow.” Jim Crow, was, of course, a reference to both
the racist policies of de jure segregation in the early twentieth century and a popular blackface
This blatantly negative and stereotypical portrayal of a minority race is sadly, not
uncommon when revising the works of Disney’s animation studios. This is especially true when
revisiting Disney’s shorter cartoons, as they were generally intended to be humorous rather than
plot driven. One excellent example of Disney’s stereotyping of “the other” can be found in the
wartime cartoon Der Führer’s Face, in which Donald Duck is trapped in a nightmare in Nazi
Germany. This brief cartoon provides a bouquet of wartime racism, both in its immediate
character illustrations and general portrayal of Germany. The single Japanese character has a
pallid yellow-green tint to his skin, slanted eyes obscured by round classes, and is comically
dwarfish. The Italian is illustrated as overweight and simple-minded The representation of the
Axis powers, who play in a pitiful and poorly organized marching band, are shown as a literal
band of misfits, with the Germans physically lacking in prowess and exuding femininity. The
background of the cartoon is nothing but a smattering of absurdly placed swastikas, Führer-
saluting machines, and smoky factories, devoid of any culture or humanistic representation.
Running head: MICKEY MONOPOLY 4
Of course, the most important aspect in understanding these portrayals, along with their
many counterparts, is that each served a purpose. They were a reflection of their time, playing
on either popular opinion or acting as simple wartime propaganda. Even with its blatant racism,
Der Führer’s Face won an Academy Award in 1943 for Best Short Subject Cartoon. Of course,
it is easy to look back on the painful representations of the “other” in Disney’s works, especially
as they occur in much more recent movies. However, even these recent faux pas can easily be
understood, though not approved, when considering that the medium has served to mirror
society’s expectations.
As the norms surrounding gender and gender roles have shifted over the past century, so
have their portrayal in Disney films. We have come a long way from the blind subservience of
Disney princesses like Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, and Cinderella. Over time, the female
even if this change has been made through small steps. In fact, some of the most recent additions
to the Disney canon, Moana and Frozen, have not even featured a love interest for the lead
character, both of which are independent females. Another recent Disney film, Big Hero 6,
showed both male and female characters engaged in scientific inquiry and general heroism, again
devoid of any Disney love for our lead characters. Even Disney’s adaptation of the fairy tale
Rapunzel, Tangled, gives Rapunzel a very twenty-first level of agency and power. She
overpowers the male lead as soon as they are introduced and repeatedly proves herself a worthy
physical adversary, making her own decisions through her journey to find her parents.
Running head: MICKEY MONOPOLY 5
Embracing Diversity
Though it certainly has a long way to go, Disney has certainly improved both the
frequency of inclusion and quality of of its minority characters. Disney provided its first non-
white hero and heroine in its (still problematic) 1992 release of Aladdin, shortly followed by the
introduction of two more nonwhite lead characters, Pocahontas and Esmeralda, in 1995 and
1996, respectively. The trend continued with the release of Mulan in 1998 and the Emperor’s
New Groove in 200, both introducing ethnic characters in a fairly non-biased way. Of course,
the biggest step towards inclusion was in 2009, when Disney introduced its first African
American princess in The Princess in the Frog. The trend has continued with the inclusion of
Japanese and Pacific Islander lead characters as Disney comes to understand the importance of
When dissecting the timeline of Disney’s history in animation, as with any history, it is
enormously important to take the context of popular culture into account. Though it has
certainly not always been as positive and innocent as Disney may have us believe, the films of
Disney were just as vulnerable to common stereotypes as any other media. When American
culture was widely guilty of African American stereotyping, Disney followed the leash to make
popular, relatable content. The same can be said of Disney’s portrayal of females. Their on-
screen representation has, throughout the past century, been a near-mirror reflection of society’s
implicit expectations. In the past, women have been expected to be subservient caregivers whose
sole purpose in living was to find and please a husband. As a result, Disney films portray the
same expectations.
Running head: MICKEY MONOPOLY 6
As culture shifts occurred, Disney reframed and literally rewrote their narratives to,
again, provide popular and entertaining content. As women were given more societal agency, so
were their animated counterparts. As racism became increasingly unpopular, Disney was quick
to abandon harsh stereotypes and introduce more characters of color. Though many blame
Disney for their portrayal of gender and racial stereotypes, the truth is that their cartoons are
nothing but a mirror image of American society. However, problems occur when Disney’s films
are not viewed with that understanding. While a newspaper article outlining the horrors of Jim
Crow in America is easy to understand as a historical artifact, its representation in cartoon form
society continues to advance in terms of gender, racial, and ethnic acceptance, the question we
should ask is not whether Disney is evil or racist, but whether we should continue to show our
children socially outdated films and expect them to follow and understand current social norms.
Running head: MICKEY MONOPOLY 7
Citations
Our Films. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2018, from https://www.disneyanimation.com/studio/our-
films