Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Handbook
Page
3 What is mentoring?
4 Versatility of a mentor‘s role
4 The mentoring relationship
5 Mentoring framework: outcome & influencing factors
7 The qualities of a mentor
8 The advantages of mentoring
8 Phases in mentoring
9 Self assessment of mentoring skills
10 What does a mentor actually do?
11 The mentoring calendar
11 Tips for setting mentoring agendas
12 The structure of mentoring meetings
12 Documenting mentoring meetings
13 Before meeting your mentee for the first time
13 The first mentoring meeting
14 A professional code of practice for mentors
15 References
Mentoring relationship
Role model
Nurture
Care giver Leading
Opening incrementally
ourselves
Functions of mentoring
Teach Sponsor Encourage Counsel Befriend
model protect affirm listen accept
inform support inspire probe relate
confirm/ promote challenge advise clarify
disconfirm
prescribe
question
Mentoring Activities
Demonstration lessons
Observations and feedback
Support meetings
This model proposes that there are three ‗mentoring dispositions‘ (shown outside the
circle) which are essential to effective mentoring:
The mentoring relationship is seen as one in which the mentee views the mentor as a
role model and where the mentor nurtures and cares for the mentee.
The mentoring relationship also serves five basic functions which can be broken down
into related behaviours.
According to this model, the behaviours and ‗functions‘ of a mentor are all actioned
through three key mentoring activities: demonstration lessons, observation and
feedback and support meetings.
Good mentoring relationships are close, individualized relationships that develop over
time between a graduate student and one or more faculty members, or with other
professionals who have a strong interest in the student‘s educational and career goals.
It includes not only academic guidance, but also prolonged nurturing of the student‘s
personal and professional development.
Mentoring focuses on the human relationships, commitments, and resources that help
students find success and fulfillment in their academic and professional pursuits.
Formal mentoring involves assigned pairings of mentors with protégés. While informal
mentoring relationships develop because of mutual identification and interpersonal
comfort (Ragins, 2002), formal mentoring programs match individuals as part of a
student development process, and the two individuals must then strive to get to know
one another. The formal mentoring relationship is part of an organized, facilitated
student development program for a specified duration and protégés are generally
prompted to have developmental goals in mind. Formal mentoring participants must
initiate interaction and establish rapport within this context.
Mentoring activities have been shown to provide both developmental (academic) and
psychosocial (e.g., friendship, role modeling, counseling, and acceptance) functions for
protégés. Psychosocial functions are more personal, relying on an emotional bond
between the mentor and protégé. The level of mentoring that occurs in the
relationship, including both members of the formal mentoring dyad, is influenced by
protégé and mentor characteristics, dyad characteristics, and organizational support.
Institute Student Mentor Programme, 2007-08, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay 5
This happens via three primary mechanisms: via selection (who one selects as a
relationship partner), evocation (the responses that are evoked from others), and
manipulation (how individuals shape the course of their relationship). Given that most
formal mentoring programs have an external party complete the matching of the
mentor and protégé, we may focus on two specified personality characteristics (pro-
activity and openness to experience) whose theoretical origins suggest would be
critical in driving the mechanisms of evocation and manipulation of interactions within
a formal mentoring context. Pro-activity refers to a tendency to shape and influence
one‘s environment. An individual with high pro-activity is likely to take action and
respond to opportunities, while low pro-activity reflects little initiative, passivity, and
the likelihood of maintaining the status quo. Protégé pro-activity is purported to
affect the amount of mentoring via initiation and maintenance of scheduled meetings
between the mentor and protégé (evocation) and through goal-oriented behaviour
during mentor interactions (manipulation). Because formal programs aim toward the
protégé, it is the protégé that is typically responsible for arranging meetings (Coley,
1996). Yet, barriers such as the perceived inaccessibility of the mentor (inducing
intimidation on the part of the protégé, and an unwillingness to ―bother‖ the more
senior individual) and time constraints highlight the situation as one where initiative
will play a role in ensuring such meetings are scheduled. Because proactive individuals
seize opportunities for growth, they may also be more prepared for mentoring
meetings, articulating questions and directing conversation in a manner that elicits
higher amounts of mentoring. While psychosocial mentoring might be elicited if the
two individuals connect on a more personal level, we expect that pro-activity of the
protégé will especially elicit mentoring, due to the ambition and initiative components.
Mentor pro-activity is theoretically relevant for similar reasons. Even if formal
mentoring programs are supposed to be protégé-driven, a mentor higher in pro-activity
will be more likely to schedule meetings if the protégé does not initiate sufficient
contact and will be more apt to plan discussions. Openness to experience encompasses
imagination, intelligence, curiosity, originality, and open-mindedness. We expect the
openness to experience of the protégé and mentor to be important to the amount of
both developmental and psychosocial mentoring that occurs in a formal mentoring
context. Through both mechanisms of evocation and manipulation, it may be suggested
that individuals with higher openness to experience will be more inquisitive and
receptive to new ideas and perspectives from a mentor that they may not have
gravitated to on their own accord. High openness to experience is expected to
similarly predispose mentors to be more willing to mentor an individual that is not a
mirror reflection of themselves, and the openness to evoke a more comfortable
atmosphere for self-disclosure. Protégés, who perceive themselves as similar to their
mentors in regard to issues such as values, perspectives and work styles, report
receiving higher levels of both developmental and psychosocial mentoring.
It is worth thinking about the personal qualities and professional skills which make
effective mentors:
Personal qualities
Professional skills
Phases in mentoring
A mentor helps to induct, orientate and develop the teaching and learning skills of the
mentee by:
Making oneself available on an ad hoc basis to freely provide appropriate support and
guidance
Developing, monitoring and reviewing an Individual Learning Plan with the mentee
Initiating reflective dialogue with the mentee, particularly about teaching and learning
Informing and supporting the mentee to adopt the policies, practices and documentation
Conducting oneself within professional boundaries, adhering to the provider’s own policies
and practices
Observing the confidential nature of the relationship and the dialogue arising within it
opportunities
Having a duty of care towards the mentee and helping them to deal with any emotional
The first month starting from the day of admissions is the most important period of
the calendar. The fortnight surrounding the mid-semester examinations and that
preceding the end-semester examinations are very important for the mentor to
continuously track the mentee‘s academic performance.
A mentor needs to be vigilant throughout the first semester to track any case of
‗ragging‘ and/or involuntary exploitation during hostel or other activities.
Frequency of meetings
Mentoring meetings should be organised in accordance with organisational policies.
Most organisations find that a weekly meeting of an hour works best. This time should
be ‗timetabled‘ for both mentor and mentee and seen as a regular commitment with
the same status as a timetabled lesson. This also ensures that mentoring is seen as
part of the mentor‘s workload and not an ‗add on‘ or ‗extra‘.
Before meeting your mentee for the first time, brainstorm possible ‗topics‘ for
discussion by thinking about the training needs of someone in their situation.
Be aware of the demands on the mentee especially in terms of their academic
commitments. Try to consider what they will need support in achieving and how
this can be done in your mentoring time.
Encourage the mentee to discriminate between urgent developmental issues or
questions which must be dealt with as soon as they arise and the sorts of
‗everyday‘ or ‗incidental‘ issues for which an answer or advice may not need to be
sought immediately but which are, nevertheless, very important to the mentee.
Agree with the mentee a way of them noting down these ‗everyday‘ or
‗incidental‘ questions and concerns which come to light during their working life
so that they are not forgotten before the next mentoring meeting. This could
be a notebook or diary where they may want to incorporate their ideas.
Agree with the mentee when and how you will deal with these ‗everyday‘ or
‗incidental‘ questions. (i.e, at the beginning or end of each mentoring session).
1. ‗Everyday‘ or ‗incidental‘ concerns which have arisen since the last meeting.
2. The main focus or task, as negotiated during the previous meeting.
3. Next meeting: focus/agenda; time; place etc.
Documentation (online via the forum or otherwise), if any, should form the basis of a
reflective dialogue between the mentor and mentee and provide a useful record for
everyone to refer back to. It should not be seen only as a way of providing evidence
that mentoring has taken place. The following points should be taken into account
when devising documentation for mentoring:
It should be confidential
The responsibility for its completion should lie with the mentee
Ownership of the documentation should rest with the mentee
It should include the opportunity to reflect upon developmental observations
The policy regarding what parties will be privy to and/or retain copies of this
documentation should be agreed within the team and both mentor and mentee made
fully aware of this policy.
Find out the name of your mentee and something about him or her.
Make a point of going to see your mentee on their first day and introduce
yourself to him/her if this has not already been done previously.
Discuss with line managers whose responsibility it is to compile and provide the
mentee with relevant documentation such as: staff handbook,
curriculum/syllabuses, organisational documentation etc.
Ensure you know how you need to document the mentoring meetings and any
lesson observations you or the mentee undertakes.
Ensure you know who should have access to mentoring documentation in
accordance with organisational policy.
Wanberg C.R., Mueller J.K. & Marchese M. (2006). Mentor and protégé
predictors and outcomes of mentoring in a formal mentoring program. Journal of
Vocational Behaviour (69: pp. 410-423)