Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A large insurance firm in New York was having trouble with its 20-storey skyscraper.
The managing director wrote to engineering firms, telling them of the repeated
complaints he had received from his employees. They were complaining about
the length of time they had to wait for the lift, so he was asking for quotes for the
installation of a new lift shaft.
The managing director received a number of quotes for tens of millions of dollars,
along with one from an engineer who said he could solve the problem for $9,000.
This quote was rejected out of hand at first, but the director was intrigued. Finally,
he telephoned and asked, ‘How can you fit a lift shaft for $9,000?’ The engineer
pointed out that the real aim was not to fit a lift shaft, but to reduce employee
frustration. His plan was to create comfortable places for employees to wait for
the lift, with easy chairs, potted plants, mirrors, fish tanks, magazines and piped
music. This solution still works well to this day. Moral: think very carefully about
your aims before starting your plans.
Almost any purposeful human activity can be said to fall into the pattern shown in
the diagram above – everything from arranging your holidays or cooking fish pie
to setting up a business or going shopping.
Teaching falls into the same pattern. Teachers first decide what they hope to achieve
(aims and objectives), then plan the lesson, then teach the lesson – i.e. carry the
plan out. Then they need to evaluate the lesson, asking themselves whether they
did indeed achieve the aims set. Assessing what the students have learned helps
answer this question. This evaluation may lead to a change in the aims for the next
lesson, or for the next time this same lesson is taught, so the process is cyclic.
409
Learning outcomes
Aims may point you in the right direction, but they don’t tell you how to get there,
or when you have arrived. So intentions must be described in a more detailed
way with what are variously called ‘specific objectives’, ‘behaviourist objectives’,
410
410 ‘competencies’ and/or ‘specific learning outcomes’. In this book, I shall call them
‘learning outcomes’. They are testable statements describing what you intend your
students to learn – for example:
• The student should be able to use inverted commas correctly.
• The student should be able to solder electronic components on to a circuit
board.
This is much better than teacher-centred aims such as ‘to describe how to punctu-
ate correctly’ or ‘to show students how to solder’. If you examine the latter care-
fully, you will see that these statements can be satisfactorily met whether or not the
student has learned anything! We must shift the focus from teaching to learning.
Doing so has a number of advantages. It makes clear what students have to practise,
and avoids a lesson dominated by teacher talk, where little real learning takes place.
It makes lesson planning easier by suggesting learning activities (e.g. corrected
practice of soldering or dialogue writing). Moreover, if you know precisely what
students should be able to do, it is much easier to assess whether or not they can
do it. This enables you to evaluate how successful your lessons have been.
The crucial point is that the outcomes precisely describe observable learner perfor-
mance, shifting the focus on to what the students will be able to do as a result of
their learning, and away from what the teacher will do. For example:
The student should be able to:
• State three advantages of the diesel engine over the petrol engine.
• List the main methods of pest management in Indonesia.
• Distinguish between fog, smog, mist and cloud.
Most people have difficulty in writing objectives at first, tending to think in terms of
what the teacher will do rather than what the student will learn. Are these specific
learning outcomes?
• To introduce the idea of percentages.
• The Peasants’ Revolt.
The answer is no – they aren’t. Could you change them so that they were? Have a
try before reading further.
Here are some legitimate objectives for the topics mentioned above. Notice that
they identify skills or abilities, and so suggest ‘use’, ‘check and correct’ and the
other elements of learning.
Students should be able to:
• express one number as a percentage of another
• calculate a given percentage of a given amount.
Students should be able to:
• state and explain the main events running up to the Peasants’ Revolt
• explain three economic consequences of the Peasants’ Revolt.
Ineffective teachers say they will ‘cover percentages’ or ‘talk about the Peasants’
Revolt’, or ‘do fractions’. But effective teachers always focus on what the student
should be able to do. Writing ‘specific learning outcomes’ or ‘specific objectives’
is an intellectually demanding task, and it requires a great deal of time and effort.
But outcomes are vital; they are the stepping stones which take the learners in the
direction of our aims.
412
413
Note that ‘to know …’ or ‘to understand …’ are not acceptable beginnings for
specific objectives, which should describe abilities that are directly observable and
testable. What does it mean to say that a student ‘knows’, say, the story of Lazarus?
Does it mean that the student is able to recognise the story and name it? Or recall
it in outline? Or recall it in detail? Or describe its significance? The objective needs
to state what the student should be able to do in an easily testable form; it could
become, for example:
To recount in outline the story of Lazarus.
Unlike ‘To know the story of Lazarus’, this is clear, it is testable, and it suggests
what the student needs to practise.
Similarly, what does it mean to ‘understand’ osmosis? Does it mean to be able to
describe its significance? To explain how and why it takes place? To be able to use
the idea to explain novel occurrences of the phenomenon? Or some combination of
these abilities? Often what is required is for the student to be able to answer exam-
ination-style questions on the topic; if so, what abilities do such questions demand?
Examining textbook and examination questions in the topic you are teaching can
help you to see what students should be able to do with the material you are teaching.
To say that they should ‘know’ or ‘understand’ the material is too vague.
General objectives
Many teachers describe their intentions partly in a form which is somewhere
between an aim and a specific learning outcome. Such intentions are variously
described as short-term aims, general instructional objectives, or non-behaviourist
objectives. Examples might be:
• To introduce students to some aspects of modern telecommunications.
• To outline modern stock-control methods.
If you choose to describe your intentions in such a way, make sure that you include
in each statement both the content itself and what will be done with such content.
Make your statements clear and simple. For example:
• To develop an appreciation of Handel’s Messiah.
• To recognise the importance of safety checks on building sites.
These general objectives are then used to generate specific learning outcomes. For
example, the safety objective above could be broken down as follows:
General objective:
To recognise the importance of frequent safety inspections.
Specific learning outcomes:
To list the main checks made during a safety inspection.
To state the main dangers to health and safety on a building site.
To recognise and correct the improper use of a ladder.
An aim may encompass many general objectives, and, in turn, each general objec-
tive will generate a number of specific learning outcomes.
414