Slope

DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTIONS LTD.
SLOPE PROTECTION FOR ROADWAY EMBANKMENT/DYKE

www.dcl-fcl.com PROJECT: LPG TERMINAL AT MOHESHKHALI, COX’S BAZAR.
ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED SLOPES

Input data
Project
Task : SLOPE PROTECTION FOR ROADWAY EMBANKMENT/DYKE
Part : LPG TERMINAL PROJECT
Description : LAND RECLAMATION & DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT AREA
Customer : SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL IND.-T.K GROUP
Author : PRIODEEP CHOWDHURY
Date : 8/7/2018
Settings
USA - LRFD 2012
Materials and standards
Concrete structures : ACI 318-11
AASHTO - reduce parameters of friction soil/soil by 2/3 
Wall analysis
Active earth pressure calculation: Coulomb
Passive earth pressure calculation: Mazindrani (Rankin)
Earthquake analysis: Mononobe-Okabe
Shape of earth wedge: Calculate as skew
Allowable eccentricity: 0.333
Internal stability: Standard - straight slip surface
Verification methodology: according to LRFD 2012
Stability analysis
Verification methodology: according to LRFD 2012
Geometry of structure
Embankment height Embankment length Terrace length With Cover thickness
No.
hn[m] ln[m] lt[m] cover tc[m]
1 2.00 3.00 YES 0.15
2 3.00 6.00 2.50 YES 0.60
3 3.00 6.00 2.00 YES 0.60
SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 1/ DCL
[GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.19.5.0 | Copyright © 2015 Fine spol. s r.o. All Rights Reserved | www.finesoftware.eu]
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. SLOPE PROTECTION FOR ROADWAY EMBANKMENT/DYKE
Name : Geometry Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
6.00
2.00
3.00
6.00
2.50
3.00
3.00
2.00
8.00
Material
Cover material
Unit weight  = 22.00 kN/m3
Shear resistance Rs = 0.00 kPa
Types of reinforcements
Type of
Name reinforcemen Line type Reinforcement strength Coefficient
No. t
Tult[kN/m] Rt[kN/m] Cds[–] Ci[–]
UX1400MSE
1 user-defined 71.00 23.64 0.60 0.70
(user)
TENSAR-
2 UX1400MSE user-defined 70.00 23.31 0.60 0.70
(user)
Reinforcement details
1. UX1400MSE (user)
Short-term char. strength Tult = 71.00 kN/m
Long-term design strength Rt = 23.64 kN/m
Overall coeff. of model uncertainty FSUNC = 1.10
Inputted reduction factors
Creep red. factor RFCR = 2.60
Durability red. factor RFD = 1.00
Installation damage red. factor RFID = 1.05
2. TENSAR-UX1400MSE (user)
Short-term char. strength Tult = 70.00 kN/m
Long-term design strength Rt = 23.31 kN/m
Overall coeff. of model uncertainty FSUNC = 1.10
Inputted reduction factors
Creep red. factor RFCR = 2.60
Durability red. factor RFD = 1.00
Installation damage red. factor RFID = 1.05
Reinforcement
Spacing of Height of first Reinforcements
Number Type of reinforcement
reinforcements reinforcement geometry
No.
of hr[m] h[m]
reinforcements
1 5 TENSAR-UX1400MSE 0.45 5.50 identical length of
(user) reinforcements
2 4 TENSAR-UX1400MSE 0.45 2.50 identical length of
(user) reinforcements
Reinforcement details
Reinforcement No. 1
Reinforcement type: TENSAR-UX1400MSE (user)
Number of reinforcements 5
Reinforcement geometry: identical length of reinforcements
Reinforcement length : 2.60 m
Reinforceme
Origin End Height from bottom Length
nt
No. l1[m] l2[m] h[m] l[m]
1 -5.00 -2.40 5.50 2.60
2 -4.10 -1.50 5.95 2.60
3 -3.20 -0.60 6.40 2.60
4 -2.30 0.30 6.85 2.60
5 -1.40 1.20 7.30 2.60
Reinforcement No. 2
Reinforcement type : TENSAR-UX1400MSE (user)
Number of reinforcements 4
Reinforcement geometry : identical length of reinforcements
Reinforcement length : 2.60 m
Reinforceme
Origin End Height from bottom Length
nt
No. l1[m] l2[m] h[m] l[m]
1 -13.00 -10.40 2.50 2.60
2 -12.10 -9.50 2.95 2.60
3 -11.20 -8.60 3.40 2.60
4 -10.30 -7.70 3.85 2.60
SOIL PARAMETERS
Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
Unit weight :  = 16.50 kN/m3
Angle of internal friction : ef = 32.00 °
Cohesion of soil : cef = 0.00 kPa
Angle of friction struc.-soil :  = 20.00 °
Saturated unit weight : sat = 17.00 kN/m3
Low plasticity silt (ML,MI), consistency soft

Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency soft

Geological profile and assigned soils

Layer
No. Assigned soil Pattern
[m]
1 10.00 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
2 10.00 Low plasticity silt (ML,MI), consistency soft
Layer
No. Assigned soil Pattern
[m]
3 10.00 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency soft
4 - Low plasticity silt (ML,MI), consistency soft
Terrain profile
Terrain behind the structure is flat.
Water influence
Ground water table at height 1.00 m from structure heel.
Input surface surcharges

Surcharge Mag.1 Mag.2 Ord.x Length Depth
No. Action
new change [kN/m2] [kN/m2] x [m] l [m] z [m]
1 YES permanent 10.00 0.00 6.00 on terrain
No. Name
1 HS20-44
Resistance on front face of the structure
Resistance on front face of the structure is not considered.
Applied forces acting on the structure

Force Nam Fx Fz M x z
No. Action
new modification e [kN/m] [kN/m] [kNm/m] [m] [m]
SUR
YE GE
1 accidental 10.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 2.00
S WAV
E
Earthquake
Factor of horizontal acceleration Kh = 0.0075
Factor of vertical acceleration Kv = 0.0075
Water below the GWT is restricted.
Settings of the stage of construction

Design situation : Extreme I
Design situation for stability analysis : Extreme I
Name : Stage settings Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
8.00
Verification No. 1
Active pressure behind the structure - partial results
Layer Thickness  d cd  d Ka Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 0.70 0.00 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.275
2 0.45 -63.43(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
3 0.45 -63.43(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
4 0.45 -63.43(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
5 0.45 -63.43(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
6 1.65 -69.48(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
7 0.45 -69.42(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
8 0.45 -69.39(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
9 0.45 -69.39(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
10 1.50 -69.39(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 16.50 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
11 1.00 -69.39(-45.00) 32.00 0.00 7.00 21.33 0.034 MODIFIED
Active pressure distribution behind the structure (without surcharge)
Layer Start [m] Z W Pressure Hor. comp. Vert. comp.
No. End [m] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa]
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
0.70 11.55 0.00 3.18 2.96 1.16
0.70 11.55 0.00 0.39 0.29 -0.26
2
1.15 18.98 0.00 0.64 0.47 -0.43
1.15 18.98 0.00 0.64 0.47 -0.43
3
1.60 26.40 0.00 0.89 0.66 -0.60
1.60 26.40 0.00 0.89 0.66 -0.60
4
2.05 33.82 0.00 1.14 0.85 -0.76
2.05 33.82 0.00 1.14 0.85 -0.76
5
2.50 41.25 0.00 1.39 1.03 -0.93
2.50 41.25 0.00 1.39 0.93 -1.04
6
4.15 68.48 0.00 2.31 1.54 -1.72
4.15 68.48 0.00 2.31 1.54 -1.72
7
4.60 75.90 0.00 2.56 1.71 -1.90
4.60 75.90 0.00 2.56 1.71 -1.90
8
5.05 83.32 0.00 2.81 1.88 -2.09
5.05 83.32 0.00 2.81 1.88 -2.09
9
5.50 90.75 0.00 3.06 2.05 -2.28
5.50 90.75 0.00 3.06 2.05 -2.28
10
7.00 115.50 0.00 3.90 2.60 -2.90
7.00 115.50 0.00 3.90 2.60 -2.90
11
8.00 122.50 0.00 4.13 2.76 -3.07
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) - partial results
Layer Thickness d   Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
1 0.70 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.275 0.279 0.004
2 0.45 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
3 0.45 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
Layer Thickness d   Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment

No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
4 0.45 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
5 0.45 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
6 1.65 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
7 0.45 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
8 0.45 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
9 0.45 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
10 1.50 32.00 0.00 0.43 0.034 0.036 0.002
11 1.00 32.00 0.00 1.05 0.034 0.040 0.006
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure)
Layer Start [m] Z D Pressure Hor. comp. Vertical comp.
No. End [m] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa]
0.00 0.00 121.58 0.54 0.51 0.20
1
0.70 11.46 110.12 0.49 0.46 0.18
0.70 11.46 110.12 0.26 0.19 -0.18
2
1.15 18.83 102.75 0.24 0.18 -0.16
1.15 18.83 102.75 0.24 0.18 -0.16
3
1.60 26.20 95.38 0.23 0.17 -0.15
1.60 26.20 95.38 0.23 0.17 -0.15
4
2.05 33.57 88.01 0.21 0.15 -0.14
2.05 33.57 88.01 0.21 0.15 -0.14
5
2.50 40.94 80.64 0.19 0.14 -0.13
2.50 40.94 80.64 0.19 0.13 -0.14
6
4.15 67.96 53.62 0.13 0.08 -0.09
4.15 67.96 53.62 0.13 0.09 -0.09
7
4.60 75.33 46.25 0.11 0.07 -0.08
4.60 75.33 46.25 0.11 0.07 -0.08
8
5.05 82.70 38.88 0.09 0.06 -0.07
5.05 82.70 38.88 0.09 0.06 -0.07
9
5.50 90.07 31.51 0.07 0.05 -0.06
5.50 90.07 31.51 0.07 0.05 -0.06
10
7.00 114.63 6.95 0.02 0.01 -0.01
7.00 114.63 6.95 0.04 0.03 -0.03
11
8.00 121.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water pressure distribution
Point Depth Hor. comp. Vert. comp.
No. [m] [kPa] [kPa]
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.70 0.00 0.00
3 1.15 0.00 0.00
4 1.60 0.00 0.00
5 2.05 0.00 0.00
6 2.50 0.00 0.00
7 4.15 0.00 0.00
8 4.60 0.00 0.00

No. [m] [kPa] [kPa]
9 5.05 0.00 0.00
10 5.50 0.00 0.00
11 7.00 0.00 0.00
12 8.00 0.00 0.00
Pressure profile due to surcharge - HS20-44
No. [m] [kPa] [kPa]
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.03 0.00 0.00
4 0.03 2.57 1.00
5 0.70 2.57 1.00
6 0.70 1.06 -0.96
7 1.15 1.06 -0.96
8 1.60 1.06 -0.96
9 2.05 1.06 -0.95
10 2.50 1.05 -0.95
11 2.50 0.95 -1.06
12 4.14 0.94 -1.05
13 4.14 0.00 0.00
14 4.15 0.00 0.00
15 4.60 0.00 0.00
16 5.05 0.00 0.00
17 5.50 0.00 0.00
18 7.00 0.00 0.00
19 8.00 0.00 0.00
Forces acting on construction
Name Fhor App.Pt. Fvert App.Pt. Coeff. Coeff. Coeff.
[kN/m] z [m] [kN/m] x [m] overtur. sliding stress
Gravity force 0.00 -3.97 371.11 11.17 0.900 0.900 1.250
Earthquake - soil wedge 3.00 -3.72 -3.00 10.53 1.000 1.000 1.000
Active pressure 12.85 -3.08 -12.50 9.01 1.500 1.500 0.900
Water pressure 0.00 -8.00 0.00 20.70 1.000 1.000 1.000
Earthq.- act.pressure 0.97 -5.96 -0.51 13.82 1.000 1.000 1.000
Dyn. water pressure at the front 0.04 -0.40 0.00 20.70 1.000 1.000 1.000
HS20-44 5.16 -6.30 -2.77 15.99 1.500 1.500 0.750
HS20-44 0.00 -8.00 12.00 20.10 0.750 0.750 1.500
SURGE WAVE -10.00 -6.00 0.00 35.50 0.000 0.000 1.750
Verification of complete wall
Check for overturning stability
Resisting moment Mres = 3636.54 kNm/m
Overturning moment Movr = 125.02 kNm/m
Wall for overturning is SATISFACTORY
Check for slip
Resisting horizontal force Hres = 197.82 kN/m

Active horizontal force Hact = 31.03 kN/m
Wall for slip is SATISFACTORY
Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY
Maximum stress in footing bottom : 189.55 kPa

Warning - allowable range of input data exceeded during pressure analysis!
The analysis is carried out with the modified value of structure inclination .
Bearing capacity of foundation soil

Design load acting at the center of footing bottom
Moment Norm. force Shear Force Eccentricity Stress
No.
[kNm/m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [–] [kPa]
1 -4826.32 465.05 1.95 0.000 189.55
2 -3123.17 316.58 31.03 0.000 129.04
Service load acting at the center of footing bottom
Moment Norm. force Shear Force
No.
[kNm/m] [kN/m] [kN/m]
1 -3745.87 366.27 9.45
2 -3228.32 324.22 22.03
Verification of foundation soil
Eccentricity verification
Max. eccentricity of normal force e = 0.000
Maximum allowable eccentricity ealw = 0.333
Eccentricity of the normal force is SATISFACTORY
Verification of bearing capacity

Design bearing capacity of foundation soil R = 250.00 kPa
Partial factor on bearing capacity Rv = 0.80
Max. stress at footing bottom  = 189.55 kPa
Bearing capacity of foundation soil Rd = 200.00 kPa
Bearing capacity of foundation soil is SATISFACTORY
Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY
Calculation of internal stability No. 1

Global stability analysis No. 1
Slip surface parameters
(slip surface after optimization)
Center S = (-19.59;-12.40) m
Radius r = 42.05 m
Angle 1 = -60.98 °
2 = 72.85 °
Slope stability check (Spencer)
Utilization = 92.73 %
Slope stability is SATISFACTORY
Name : Global stability Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
(-19.59;-12.40)
+x
8.00
+z

Slope

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Slope

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTIONS LTD.

SLOPE PROTECTION FOR ROADWAY EMBANKMENT/DYKE

ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED SLOPES

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 1/ DCL

Name : Geometry Stage - analysis : 1 - 0

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 2/ DCL

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 3/ DCL

Low plasticity silt (ML,MI), consistency soft

Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency soft

Geological profile and assigned soils

1 10.00 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense

2 10.00 Low plasticity silt (ML,MI), consistency soft

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 4/ DCL

3 10.00 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency soft

4 - Low plasticity silt (ML,MI), consistency soft

Input surface surcharges

Applied forces acting on the structure

Settings of the stage of construction

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 5/ DCL

Name : Stage settings Stage - analysis : 1 - 0

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 6/ DCL

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 7/ DCL

Layer Thickness d   Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 8/ DCL

Point Depth Hor. comp. Vert. comp.

Check for slip

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 9/ DCL

Resisting horizontal force Hres = 197.82 kN/m

Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY

Maximum stress in footing bottom : 189.55 kPa

Bearing capacity of foundation soil

Verification of bearing capacity

Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY

Calculation of internal stability No. 1

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 10/ DCL

Name : Global stability Stage - analysis : 1 - 1

SAMUDA PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES/8/9/2018 Page 11/ DCL

Вам также может понравиться