Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Assessment 2:
Lesson Plan Analysis
Xintong Wu
19517836
2
Table of Contents
Front Page ........................................................................................................................ 1
Reference ....................................................................................................................... 15
3
Lesson Plan
they engage in
critically
thinking about
the topic.
Display the
ability to
formulate
equations of salt
dissolved in
water and sugar
dissolved in
water.
Explain the
differences
between a
physical and
chemical
reactions.
Ask the question “Ok class what come to mind when you think about the word freeze?
Write the word freeze on the board with a circle around it.
Guide their thoughts to the lessons focus without influencing there the responses.
By asking:
How does something freeze?
Why it freezes?
What happens when something freezes?
5min Explain to the class the aim of the today lesson will be on the freezing points of water, salt water and
sugar water.
10min
Assign students into groups. 4-5 students per group. Give the students roles within the group: timer
(keeps track of the time), recorder (writes down results), handler (mixing the solutions together) and
retriever (takes and places the test tube rack in the freezer).
Explain what to do in the practical and to fellow the methods sheet that was handed out.
Ask the students to make their predictions on what will happen to the three solutions before and
during the practical. Predict the aim of the experiment, if students are confused or haven’t identified
the correct aim help them factor it out or provide the aim if necessary.
Guide or provide assistance at the start of the experiment without influencing the students’ thought
processes. Walk around the classroom.
After the students record the first lot of results for the practical introduce the boxes foam spheres
representing the elements: Na (Sodium), Cl (Chloride), C12H22O11 and H2O to each group.
5
Start with saying: Ok class lets zoom in on what’s happening to the three solutions in the freezer. I
have a box of elements and compounds of the water, salt and sugar
Ask if the students know the common names of elements and compounds of chemical symbols on the
foam spheres. Allow them to refer to their periodic table for guidance.
“Sugar is make up of these elements Carbon, Hydrogen and Oxygen which of the spheres has these
elements?”
Followed by: “Now what can Hydrogen and Oxygen make and which of the spheres represents
water?”
Instruct the student to predict what is happening to all three solutions using the foam spheres.
Prepare a table for the combined results of the all class. Have the recorder of each group write down
their result on the table.
Discuss the predictions and errors from each group and compare them with all class. Correct any
misconceptions the students may have.
Ask questions to why the thought that way and how it relates to the topic.
Discuss if by dissolving salt and sugar is a chemical change or physical one referring to the experiment
the student preformed and foam modals.
Demonstrate what the correct formula for salt water and sugar water and the how the freezing point of
water is reduced using the foam spheres.
Video representation of why salt reduces the freezing point of water with similarities to the foam
models (only if time is available)
Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkhWV2uaHaA
Similarities in 0:50 seconds to 1:12 minutes of the video.
Discuss and compare the video with the experiment the student preformed and demonstration with the
class.
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model elements.
Evaluation score – refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Deep knowledge is obtained through chemical experiments in the lab. Key
5 ideas and concept are focused on freezing points of salt water and sugar water.
1.2 Deep understanding
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: The lesson is engaging with chemical labs in which students can explore and
5 understand the key concepts. Discussion is also involved after labs. However, time plan
is not sufficient for students to demonstrate deep understanding.
1.3 Problematic knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Opportunities are provided for students to construct their own knowledge,
5 allowing students to question the assumptions.
1.4 Higher-order thinking
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: High order of thinking is achieved through content discussions and allocated
5 classroom activities.
1.5 Metalanguage
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Timetables is a form of metalanguage and is communicated periodically
5 throughout the lesson with commentary of the aspects of the language.
1.6 Substantive communication
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Constant communication and teacher-student interaction before and after
5 experiments. Sufficient time is given on discussion and reflection of the experiments.
Quality learning environment
2.1 Explicit quality criteria
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Lab results are recorded in the table and compare them with all class,
5 allowing the teacher to aid in reviewing their work.
2.2 Engagement
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Students are assigned to different roles within the group to do the
5 experiments, ensuring all class deeply engaged.
2.3 High expectations
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Students participate in classroom discussions about their lab results. They are
5 encouraged to figure out the correct formula for salt water and sugar water.
2.4 Social support
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Teacher gives detailed instructions and safety procedure of the experiment ,
5 and provides support for students during experiment.
2.5 Students’ self-regulation
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Little information is given about student self-regulation. As the experiment
5 involves working in groups, inappropriate behaviour may be present but not addressed in
the lesson plan.
2.6 Student direction
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: The lesson is designed and scaffolded by the teacher including discussions
5 and activities performed. The experiment is done in groups by students independently
with support and assistance from the teacher.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Student background knowledge is mentioned in the introduction part of the
5 lesson and the discussion part after the experiment. There is some connection to real
world background knowledge.
3.2 Cultural knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Other cultures are not mentioned or incorporated. The scope is difficult to
5 incorporate culture.
3.3 Knowledge integration
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: some connections are made between the chemical topics and subject of with
5 life science, physics, and earth science.
3.4 Inclusivity
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments: Students from all groups are included in the experiment, but probably not all
7
Identify the four NSW QT model elements you are targeting for improvement.
QT model
1) 2.5 Student’s self-regulation 2) 3.4 Inclusivity
3) 3.3 Knowledge integration 4) 3.6 Narrative
Resources:
Projector and Kahoot log in screen
Body Recap of Freezing point and Teacher asks students to take out their Student
5min common chemical reactions. smart device. Teacher directs students to
kahoot.it and gives the game pin 2740920.
Which one of the following Remind class that this is revision of prior
represents a physical change? knowledge.
You can tell a chemical reaction Student: Takes out devices and opens to
because it always produces… Kahoot.
3 min Negotiation of Safety Teacher: Hand out the worksheet, set up Teachers
Hand out the experiment worksheet. projector to display the information of
Read through the safety procedures. equipment list and safety procedures.
Describe how it is a risk and then Answer students’ questions in related to
explain how to prevent the risk. detailed safety rules.
Teacher reads through the method students per group. Give the students roles
steps as a class, directing students within the group: leader (maintain group
to read their hard copy worksheet cohesion) timer (keeps track of the time),
as well. The teacher should direct recorder (writes down results), handler
students to the equipment while (mixing the solutions together) and
reading the method, interjecting to retriever (takes and places the test tube
emphasize key points to students. rack in the freezer).
Eg. Slowly pour the sugar into your
Explain what to do in the practical and to
plastic test tubes and shake it
fellow the methods sheet that was handed
gently until the sugar is totally out.
dissolved.
Ask the students to make their predictions
on what will happen to the three solutions
before and during the practical. Predict the
aim of the experiment, if students are
confused or haven’t identified the correct
aim help them factor it out or provide the
aim if necessary.
5 min Connections to chemical elements: Teachers: Introduce the boxes foam Studnet
Na (Sodium, Cl(Chloride), Na spheres representing the elements: Na
(Sodium), Cl (Chloride), C12H22O11 (Sodium), Cl (Chloride), C12H22O11 and
and H2O. H2O to each group.
Although the original lesson plan was comprehensive with sufficient learning content and
well-structured class planning, there are four standards that can be improved with respect
Guide (DET, 2003). These four standards are 1.3 deep understanding, 2.5 student’s self
Standard 2.5 for students’ self-regulation is not mentioned enough in the original lesson
plan. The main class activity in the lesson plan is group experiment of 4-5 students. Different
roles are given to each student, and these roles are timer, recorder, handler, and retriever.
One more role is added as modification is the leader. Group cohesion is critical during
cooperation since conflicts between group members can cause extra time for group task
and failure to the lesson goal. To ensure every student fully participate in the experiment,
time management is critical for both teacher and students. Therefore, how to maintain a
“demonstrate autonomy and initiative in relation to their own behavior in ways that allow
the class to ‘get on’ with learning” (DET, 2003). If there are five students in the group, then
one student can take the role of leader who is in charge of other students in the group to
finish their tasks smoothly. Group of four students can allow one of them to take double
roles.
during class discussion section. In the original plan, there is limited connections made
between lesson topics and other subjects. Adjustments to further improvement include
13
bring out questions such as “how freezing can affect our environment?” followed by answer
“freezing can cause some animals to lose their habitats, it can cause danger on roadways,
etc.” This question links the concept of freezing points in chemical world to the
environmental science, and it is also relevant to our daily life. Another example of question
is “how the concept of freezing can be used in our daily life?”, and the answers for that
include the use of salt to melt ice on roads during the winter and also the use of ice and salt
Several improvements are added to in regards to Standard 3.4 inclusivity throughout the
entire lesson plan. First of all, Kahoot quiz is an effective teaching tool for all students
because it not only increases students’ enthusiasm about learning but also their class
participation. Anonymity during the quiz game alleviates some students’ uneasiness
compared to answering questions face to face. Providing reward such as candies and
chocolates for the winner is also a good way to encourage participation. Secondly, asking
the recorder of each experiment group to write down the results also help to ensure all
groups take part in the experiment. Last but not the least, asking one take home message
learned from each student provides the opportunity for students to be included in the class
activity, and it also can be use as an evidence for teachers to know how well the students
learn.
In respect to the NSW quality teaching coding model (DET, 2008), adjustments have been
undertaken to the element 3.6 narratives. In the original lesson plan, there is no use of any
narrative components during the whole lesson. Neither the teacher talks about her or his
relevant personal experiences or imagined story, nor the students are asked to write down
14
or give presentation about their own stories related to the content of the lesson. Therefore,
a quiz worksheet handed out as homework to each student provide the opportunity
illustrate key concepts of the lesson and assist them to demonstrate their understanding
using abstract constructs. Moreover, students are encouraged to talk in a narrative form
about their feelings and experiences from the experiment in the group discussion to
Reference
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011) Australian Professional
source/apst-resources/australian_professional_standard_for_teachers_final.pdf
Catholic Education Office (2013). Gifted and talented students (A resource guide for teacher
http://www.cecv.catholic.edu.au/getmedia/0d923109-6fb2-4f32-a2e6-
c437073dfccf/Gifted-and-Talented-handbook.aspx?ext=.pdf
https://app.education.nsw.gov.au/qualityteachingrounds/Assets/Classroom_Practic
e_Guide_ogogVUqQeB.pdf
NSW Education Standards Authority (n.d.). Science in kindergarten to Year 10. Retrieved
from http://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/learning-
areas/science
NSW Education Standards Authority (n.d.). Gifted and talented students. Retrieved from:
http://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/diversity-in-
learning/gifted-and-talented-students
Quality teaching in NSW public schools. (2003). A classroom practice guide. Retried from
https://app.education.nsw.gov.au/quality-teaching-
rounds/Assets/Classroom_Practice_Guide_ogogVUqQeB.pdf
16
www.wuxt.weebly.com