Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2 0 1 7
HOK
2 0 1 7
Published by ORO Editions
Publishers of Architecture, Art, and Design
Publisher: Gordon Goff
www.oroeditions.com
info@oroeditions.com
You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
PREFACE
“Achieving great design with technical Achieving great design with technical excellence
excellence means setting bold design means setting bold aspirations that are achieved
by independent thinking, building science and
aspirations ...”
sound judgment—all supported by a collaborative
team and advanced digital technology. We
Great design is realized at the intersection of
provide the best service to both our contractual
art, craft and science. Technical excellence is
and extended clients by realizing great designs
critical to that realization and it is important
that are enjoyed by those who experience them,
that everyone understands the difference
and whose elegant expression is informed by
between technical competence and technical
intelligence, efficiency and craft.
excellence, as well as the importance of each
to our aspirations for our constantly developing
The 2017 Design Annual illustrates a diverse
practice.
range of building typologies and scales, from
concepts to completed works that exemplify the
Technical competence is essential to the delivery
integration of design ambition with technical
of good projects and forms the foundation
excellence. The places and spaces we create
of our professional responsibilities: code
combine imagination and knowledge to make the
compliance, interdisciplinary coordination, good
world a better place. Ours is a constant endeavor
specifications, clear documents and effective
to evolve and improve, informed by optimism and
construction phase services.
the thrill of creative effort.
AVIATION + TRANSPORTATION LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal B New York, New York, USA 12
New LaGuardia Airport Master Plan New York, New York, USA 38
HOSPITALITY Fogo de Chao Brazilian Steakhouse San Francisco, California, USA 248
Jacob K. Javits Convention Center Design Competition New York, New York, USA 256
JUSTICE Davidson County Criminal Justice Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA 274
SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY Education Building for Confidential Client California, USA 316
The Francis Crick Institute London, UK 326
Medical Research Building for Confidential Client California, USA 348
University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine Tampa, Florida, USA 358
SPORTS + RECREATION + Major League Soccer Stadium St. Louis, Missouri, USA 368
ENTERTAINMENT Miami Dolphins Hard Rock Stadium Miami, Florida, USA 376
PROJECT LOCATIONS
HOK 2017 Design Annual Projects
HOK Office
Polsinelli Office
Fogo de Chao
Brazilian Steakhouse
Davidson County
Ghirardelli Criminal Justice Center
Square Plaza
Center for Academic Miami Dolphins
Medicine for Hard Rock Stadium
Confidential Client
University of South Florida
Medical Research Morsani School of Medicine
Building for
Confidential Client The Allen Mixed-Use
Dentsu Aegis Development
Network Office Corporate Amenities Building
Education Building for for Confidential Client
Confidential Client
Polsinelli Office
The Francis Crick Institute
Al Fozan Mosque
Mixed-Use Development
Design Competition
Tower Design
Competition
departures hall concept
AVIATION +
TRANSPORTATION
13
LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
CENTRAL TERMINAL B
New York, New York, USA
CONCEPT
1. terminal layout
15
2. roof plan
2.
3.
view from departures road
“The design is intended as a commentary on the contemporary expectation of air travel—a celebration of
movement utilizing an architecture of transparency and fluidity. The terminal is a civic building serving as a noble
welcome to New York. In the spirit of the city’s great high-rises like the Woolworth and Chrysler buildings, which in
their time were considered cathedrals of commerce, we see the new terminal as a cathedral of mobility.”
1.
2.
19
20
SECTION
1. north-south section
2. east-west section
1.
2.
21
1. feature wall study model
2. arrivals level
24
1. pedestrian bridges + airfield 2. concessions + bridge floor
2.
1.
25
pedestrian bridge
28
1. pedestrian bridge + headhouse connection
29
2. departures hall
30
1. pedestrian bridge structural model
31
2. concourse entry
headhouse view of airfield
34
1. departures hall 2. departures floor
2.
1.
35
aerial view of central terminal b
conceptual aerial view looking east
AVIATION +
TRANSPORTATION
39
NEW
LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
MASTER PLAN
New York, New York, USA
CONCEPT
A. concourse a
B. concourse b
C. west parking garage
D. terminal b
E. central hall
F. grand central parkway
G. concourse d
H. concourse e
I. concourse f
J. concourse g
K. concourse connector
L. east parking garage
M. terminal c
A B
D E
�
VAN
��
DN
C
G
H
I
J
K
00
-9
737
L
M
44
SITE STRATEGY
1.
45
2. redefined airside/landside boundary
3.2.1 CORE
3.2 GATE AREA REDEVELOPMENT
TERMINAL AREA Tab
3.2 CORE
TERMINAL B TERMINAL AREA
The Redevelopment
3.2.1 GATE AREA of Terminals
REDEVELOPMENT B and C involves moving the terminals closer to
Tab
Grand Central Parkway to provide increased airside operational areas; the basic
3.2.1
TERMINAL
premise of this
GATE AREA REDEVELOPMENT
B approach being a recognized need to improve the flow of aircraft Tab
Nu
TERMINAL
traffic
The on the B
Redevelopment airfieldof and apron parking
Terminals B and C areas.
involves moving the terminals closer to
Grand
The Central Parkway
Redevelopment to provideBincreased
of Terminals and C involvesairside operational
moving areas; the
the terminals basic
closer to
An
premise
Grand island-gate
Central concept
of thisParkway
approachto for Terminal
being
provide B of 35 gates
a recognized
increased need to
airsidewill providethe
improve
operational increased
flow of
areas; aircraft
the basic Nu
Nu
maneuverability
traffic
premise onofthethis and flexibility
airfield
approach beingfor
and apron aircraft
aparking
recognized movements
areas. around the
need to improve the flow
terminal for the
of aircraft
multiple Nu
traffic onairlines and numerous
the airfield and apronaircraftparkingtypesareas.operating at LaGuardia Airport. With the
elimination
An island-gate of dead-end
concept for alleyways,
Terminalaircraft
B of 35operation
gates willatprovide
Terminal B will have flow-
increased De
Nu
through
maneuverability
An island-gate capability andwith
concept provide
flexibility for
for Terminal a more
aircraft
B ofefficient
movements
35 gatesoperation
will around andthe
provide reduced
terminal
increased ground delays.
for the
Nu
multiple
maneuverabilityairlines and and numerous
flexibility for aircraft
aircrafttypes operatingaround
movements at LaGuardia
the terminal Airport.
forWith
the the
The 35 gates
elimination at and
Terminal
of dead-end B are aircraft
alleyways, made uptypes
aircraftof operation
17operating
gates on the
at at west B
Terminal most concourse
willAirport.
have flow- RO
De
multiple airlines numerous LaGuardia With the
A,
through and 18
elimination gates
capability onwith
of dead-end the adjacent
provide
alleyways, aconcourse
more B. Each
efficient
aircraft ofatthese
operation
operation andconcourses
Terminal reduced canflow-
ground
B will have delays. De
accommodate
through capability twowithADGprovide
IV aircraft within
a more an otherwise
efficient operation ADG andIIIreduced
fleet. Anground
alternatedelays.
layout
The 35has gatesalsoatbeen developed
Terminal B are madesuch thatup ofall17gates
gates atonTerminal
the west B would accommodate
most concourse RO
as
A, a 35
anddesign
18 aircraft
gates ADG
on the III,
adjacentandmadeno ADG
concourse IV 17
gates.
B. Each In of
this case, and as illustrated in the Figure 3.2: Masterplan, Redefined Airside/Landside Boundary
The gates at Terminal B are up of gates onthese
the concourses
west most can
concourse RO
adjacent
A, and 18Figure
accommodate gates 3.6:
twoonADG New
the IVLaGuardia
aircraft
adjacent Airport
within
concourse anB. Gate Area
otherwise
Each Redevelopment
ADG
of these III fleet. An Plan,
concourses can a total of
alternate
38
layout gates
accommodate hascanalsobe twoaccommodated,
been developed
ADG IV aircraft 19
such gates
that
within allatotherwise
an eachat
gates ofTerminal
the
ADG twoIIIconcourses.
Bfleet.
would Anaccommodate
alternate
as a design aircraft Figure 3.2: Masterplan, Redefined Airside/Landside Boundary
layout has also beenADG III, andsuch
developed no ADG thatIVallgates.
gatesInatthis case, B
Terminal andwouldas illustrated
accommodate in the2.
adjacent Figure
as a design
TERMINAL C 3.6:ADG
aircraft NewIII, LaGuardia
and no ADG Airport Gate Area
IV gates. In thisRedevelopment
case, and as illustratedPlan, a total
in theof Figure 3.2: Masterplan, Redefined Airside/Landside Boundary
38
adjacent gatesFigure
can be3.6: accommodated,
New LaGuardia 19 Airport
gates atGate eachArea
of the two concourses.
Redevelopment Plan, a total of
Terminal C adopts a modified pier layout incorporating dual taxilanes between the
38 gates can be accommodated, 19 gates at each of the two concourses.
concourses, versus the single taxilane operation today. This layout represents the
TERMINAL
most efficientClayout as there is insufficient space to use the island concourse
TERMINAL
concept.
Terminal C Dual Ctaxi alanes
adopts between
modified pier the
layoutconcourses provide
incorporating dual increased
taxilanestaxiing between capacity
the
and
Terminal bypass
concourses, capability
versusathe
C adopts for aircraft
single
modified in
taxilane
pier theoperation
layout terminal area,
today.allowing
incorporating Thistaxilanes
dual layoutfor reduced
represents
betweentaxi-in
the and
the
taxi-out
most
concourses, times
efficient and
layout
versus reduced
as single
the there gate
is delays.operation
insufficient
taxilane Thespace
introduction
to use
today. of
thedual
This island
layout and flow-through
concourse
represents the
taxilanes
concept.
most efficient moretaxi
Dual thanlanes
layout doubles
between
as there the airside areaspace
the concourses
is insufficient for aircraft,
to usegreatly
provide increased
the island increasing
taxiing gate
concourse use
capacity
flexibility.
and
concept. bypass Incapability
Dual addition,
taxi lanes the new taxilane
forbetween
aircraft in
the the configuration
terminal area,
concourses allows
provideallowingfor for
increasedmore flexibility
reduced
taxiing during
taxi-in
capacity and
irregular
taxi-out
and bypassevents
times andlikereduced
capability adverse weather
gate
for aircraft delays.
in the or terminal
ground holds.
The introduction of dualfor
area, allowing and flow-through
reduced taxi-in and
taxilanes
taxi-out times moreand thanreduced
doublesgate the delays.
airside area for aircraft, greatly
The introduction of dual increasing
and flow-throughgate use
Additionally,
flexibility.
taxilanes more each
In addition,
than new gate
the
doubles new will be
taxilane
the ableconfiguration
airside to
areaaccommodate allows
for aircraft, any for
greatlyaircraft
more up to ADG
flexibility
increasing gate III,
during
use
and
irregular someevents
flexibility. willaddition,
In accommodate
like adverse
the new ADG
weather IV, assuring
taxilane groundthat
orconfiguration there
holds. allowsis always
for more a gate available
flexibility during for
the aircraft
irregular types
events that
like are arriving
adverse weather at the terminal.
or ground holds.
Additionally, each new gate will be able to accommodate any aircraft up to ADG III,
In
and summary,
some willthe
Additionally, each main
newbenefits
accommodate gate willADGofbethis
IV, approach
assuring
able to gate
that
to accommodate there area
is
any improvements
always
aircraft a gate will be:
up toavailable
ADG III, for Figure 3.3: Masterplan, Increased Circulation Capacity of Taxilanes
•the An increase
and aircraft
some types
will ofthat
approximately
accommodate ADG 2
are arriving atmiles
IV, the in taxilane
terminal.
assuring length
that there available
is always for ground
a gate available for
maneuvering;
the aircraft types that are arriving at the terminal. 3.
•In summary,
Decongestion the main of maneuvering
benefits of this aircraft on and
approach to off
gate stand
areaby implementing
improvements dual
will be:or Figure 3.3: Masterplan, Increased Circulation Capacity of Taxilanes
loop
•In summary, taxilanes;
An increase of approximately
the main benefits of this 2 miles in taxilane
approach to gatelength
areaavailable
improvements for ground
will be: Figure 3.3: Masterplan, Increased Circulation Capacity of Taxilanes
•• Ability of every
maneuvering;
An increase gate to be able2to
of approximately accommodate
miles minimum
in taxilane length ADG IIIfor
available aircraft,
ground
• whereas
Decongestion
maneuvering; currently
of a number
maneuvering of gates
aircraft are
on restricted
and off to
stand regional
by jets
implementing only; dual or
•• Availability
loop taxilanes;
Decongestion of some dedicated aircraft
of maneuvering deicing positions
on and offthat standwillbyallow aircraft todual
implementing move oroff
• stand
Ability
loop sooner
of every
taxilanes; making
gate to forbemore
ableefficient use of gates.
to accommodate minimum ADG III aircraft,
• whereas
Ability of currently
every gate a number
to be able of togates are restricted
accommodate to regional
minimum ADGjets only;
III aircraft,
By
• providing
Availability
whereas more areaaon
of some
currently the airside
dedicated
number to improve
ofdeicing
gates aircraft
positions
are thatto
restricted operational
will allow aircraft
regional areas,
jets the
to
only; move off
footprint
• stand area
sooner
Availability available
somefor
of making forboth
more
dedicated passenger
efficient processing
use of gates.
deicing positions thatfacilities
will allow andaircraft
supporting
to move off
roadway,
standtransportation
sooner makinginfrastructure
for more efficient and car
useparking
of gates. has naturally been modified
as
By well. The requirements
providing more area onfor thethis program
airside has not
to improve been reduced,
aircraft operational butareas,
a combined
the
solution
footprint of
By providing redistribution
area available
more area on ofthe
for some
both functions,
passenger
airside car parking
processing
to improve aircraft for example,
facilities
operational and greater
and supporting
areas, the
vertical
footprintdevelopment
roadway, transportation
area available is being
for proposed.
infrastructure
both passenger and processing
car parking facilities
has naturally been modified
and supporting
as well. The
roadway, requirementsinfrastructure
transportation for this program andhascar not beenhas
parking reduced,
naturally butbeen
a combined
modified
Further
solution details
as well. The of how each
of redistribution
requirements offorofthis
these
some projects
functions,
program function
car
has parking
not been andfor work
example,
reduced, together
but and as one
greater
a combined
airport
solutionwill
vertical follow.
development
of redistribution is being
of someproposed.
functions, car parking for example, and greater
vertical development is being proposed.
Further details of how each of these projects function and work together as one
airport will follow. 4.
Further details of how each of these projects function and work together as one Figure 3.4: Masterplan, Increased Gate Flexability
airport will follow.
1.
2.
conceptual view of central hall airtrain lga station from the grand central parkway
conceptual view of the east airtrain lga station and landside connector from the grand central parkway
“The vision for a single, unified airport presented design and implementation challenges. By condensing the primary elements of the
new Central Terminal B into three key components―a ‘big roof,’ a continuous brow and a continuous enclosure language―we were
able to establish parameters for a single language across all the varied aspects of the Grand Central Parkway frontage. This also
reinforced linking Terminal B to Central Hall, existing and new parking structures, AirTrain stations and the new Terminal C.
We worked extensively with the Port Authority, airport stakeholders and Governor Cuomo’s Airport Advisory Panel to ensure the
guidelines illustrated great design for the airport of tomorrow, consistency and achievable programs for all parties.”
PLAN
1. l street, n.w. 2.
57
3. ground floor
A. building lobby
B. landscape plaza
C. tenant lobby
D. tenant space
C
16th street, n.w.
B A D
l street, n.w.
58
1. existing condition
59
2. new exterior view
60
FACADE
1. west elevation
61
2. stainless steel cable trellis 4. section view of curtain wall with trellis
3. trellis with hydroponics vegetation 5. plan view of curtain wall with trellis
2.
4.
3. 5.
view of penthouse lounge + terrace
“The building sits within the historic context of 16th Street, which frames the vista to the White House. It combines
contextual massing with contemporary details and provides a complete surprise in the lobby.”
CONCEPT
1. massing sketch
1. 2.
67
3. 5.
4.
68 “We sought to connect and expand Buffalo Bayou Park into the project
SITE STRATEGY
and organize the mixed uses around the creation of activated outdoor
1. location map spaces on multiple levels. The project’s signature elements—the mixed-
2. site plan
use hotel and residential tower and the retail pavilion—engage the city
at the skyline and at the ground level to provide both a landmark and a
1. 2.
69
3. building location studies 4. elevated park studies 5. landscape studies
3. 4. 5.
70
SITE PLAN
1. site
ODES
A. retail pavilion
FARMER’S MARKET
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
E
PRECEDENTS - PROGRAM
ENTS - STREETSCAPE + PARK PRECEDENTS - STREETSCAPE + PARK
EETSCAPE + PARK
DECEMBER 01, 2016 DECEMBER 01, 2016 ALLEN PARKWAY MIXED USE _ HOUSTON, TX
3.
DECEMBER 01, 2016 DECEMBER 01, 2016 ALLEN PARKWAY MIXED USE _ HOUSTON,
2.
1.
73
FACADE
HOTEL/CONDO OPTION COMPARISON
1. view from buffalo bayou park
2. facade studies
HOTEL/CONDOOPTION
HOTEL/CONDO OPTIONCOMPARISON
COMPARISON
N2 OPTION 3
2.
3. 4.
aerial view
1. central plaza transformation
COMMERCIAL
79
2. view from the water GHIRARDELLI
SQUARE
PLAZA
San Francisco, California, USA
HISTORY
1. Woolen Mill Era: 1858-1889 2. Chocolate Factory Era: 1892–1962 3. Mixed-Use Development Era: 1962-1967
Pioneer Woolen Mills circa 1862-1899 at the Ghirardelli complex circa 1911. The Pioneer Ghirardelli Square 1965. The property was
original shoreline. Woolen Mills were originally built in 1862. designed for adaptive reuse and rebranded
Between 1893 and 1919, the D. Ghirardelli Ghirardelli Square by Lawrence Halprin and
company developed the site with several new architects Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons.
buildings.
81
SITE PLAN A
4. neighborhood context
G H
E
J beach street
van ness avenue
P
larkin street
hyde street
polk street
I
The city-approved vision plan identified 14 ongoing projects focused on improving public access; day, night
82
1. site plan and year-round uses; transportation connections; regional plantings; and thoughtful choreography of historic
and modern material and furnishing palettes.
A. upper plaza
B. fountain plaza The vision plan, master plan, design guidelines and implementation projects reconnect the Square to its
C. larkin street context, transportation lines and extraordinary views. New gateway design elements such as monolithic,
D. west plaza reclaimed redwood timber seating, pedestal paving and regional plantings enable fresh uses and functions
E. larkin street + beach street stairs while complementing the historic factory material palette.
beach street
larkin street
B
polk street
D
C
A
Because sustainability and accessibility go hand-in-hand, the design introduces universally accessible routes and systems that ensure
access to these new amenities and sustainable features across the Square.
UNIVERSALLY LOW-VOLTAGE,
ACCESSIBLE LED HIGH
ROUTES AND EFFICIENCY
SYSTEMS FIXTURES
REUSED,
RECLAIMED
REDWOOD
TIMBER
BENCHES
STORMWATER
TREATMENT
GARDENS
HEAT ISLAND
REDUCTION REGIONALLY
THROUGH HIGH NATIVE AND
REFLECTIVITY ADAPTIVE
HARDSCAPE VEGETATION
2. pre-renovation
3. post-renovation
A. cast-in-place concrete
B. brick inlay
C. corrugated steel
D. i-beam
E. remnant foundation wall
F. i-beam pedestal
G. cast-in-place concrete 1
H. cast-in-place concrete 2
I. deteriorated waterproofing
J. garage structural slab
K. drainage pipe
L. 6” x 12” concrete modular pavers
M. 12” x 48” concrete modular pavers
N. paving pedestal
O. new waterproofing
P. concrete structural slab
Q. reuse existing drainage
R. additional drainage
1.
2. 3.
85
4. materiality
A C
B D
86
1. upper plaza looking east toward heritage olive tree
“The revitalized Square serves multiple roles at multiple scales at the intersection of land, water, city and nature.”
hotel 35 floors
office 32 floors
CONCEPT
1. precedent
91
2. site plan
A. hotel tower
B. office tower
A
92
DESIGN
1.
1750
94
ENERGY
PROPOSED SCHEME:
1. insulationDAILY
ANNUAL AVERAGE + wind INSOLATION VALUES
875
Wh/m2
1750
0
69
T O W E R C O M P E T I T I O N • T H E A V E N U E S R I Y A D H
95
2. tower form - self-shading
FORM - MORPHOLOGY
3. facade systems
EFFICIENCY
I.2. extrusion twist
II. stepping
III. self-shading
IV.
3. hotel: north and south hotel: east and west office: east and west office: north and south
19
FACADE DESIGN
g strategy, FACADE
PRINCIPLESDESIGN The character of the building’s STUDY After settling upon a final massing strategy,
of this 4. envelope is one of the most impactful aspects of the the same tools that informed the selection of this
e effects building aesthetic, perhaps only second to the building massing have also been used to examine the effects
h building. form. However, it is also a critical component of the of the facade and shading systems for each building.
dgto analyze
strategy, building design impacting
PRINCIPLES a wide range
The character of theof building
building’s Going forward,
STUDY these tools
After settling will
upon afi also be used to
nal massing analyze
strategy,
eof
schematic
this performance
envelope metrics,
is one of the including: daylight
most impactful availability;
aspects of the and same
the optimize subsequent
tools studies
that informed during theofschematic
the selection this
96
1. view from west 2. aerial view of the development
1. 2.
97
drop-off + entry
regional growth of chicago
1990
102
INFORMATION
CLIENT HOK
our practice, we must understand the context in which we work and live
Working within this context helps us identify and prioritize projects that
SHIFTING POPULATIONS
3
CHICAGO INDIANAPOLIS COLUMBUS DETROIT MILWAUKEE CHICAG
2,719,000 852,000 822,000 688,000 599,000 610,55
2,896,000 792,000 715,000 945,000 597,000 476,446
28
Population 2013
1. Population 2000 (Decline / Growth)
3 26 30 13 36
28 14 27 21 29
GDP Growth Rate Below National Average (Number is National Total GDP Ranking)
2. GDP Growth Rate Above National Average (Number is National Total GDP Ranking)
105
3. population trends of major midwestern cities
CLEVELAND
CH
(≈19
Pote
COLUMBUS
CHICAGO
2010 (2,697,300)
1950
2,000,000
1950
SOUTH
MIDWEST
21.7%
NE 1,500,000
1950
WEST
1950
IND
1960 CO
DE
1,000,000
1950 MI
19501950 1970
1950 KA
Midwest INDIANAPOLIS
Populatio 1970 CL
29% n Percent 1960 COLUMBUS MI
1960 21% DETROIT
OMAHA TOLEDO
ST
CIN
2015 1960
MILWAUKEE DE
1950 1950 1970
KANSAS CITY 500,000
1970 MINNEAPOLIS
CLEVELAND
1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
ST LOUIS
TOLEDO CINCINNATI
1960
DES MOINES
1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
106
INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION
Transportation
ties
CHICAGO
CHICAGO DETROIT
DETROIT
Mining, Logging Mining, Logging
MINNEAPOLIS and Construction and Construction
ST LOUIS 2.5 2.5
Government Manufacturing Government MANUFACTURING
KANSAS CITY
2.0 2.0
ORMATION CINCINNATI
COLUMBUS 1.5 1.5
1.5 1.5
0.5 0.5
COLUMBUS CLEVELAND
Mining, Logging Mining, Logging
and Construction and Construction
2.5 2.5
Government Manufacturing Government MANUFACTURING
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
0.5 0.5
1.5 1.5
0.5 0.5
1.5 1.5
0.5 0.5
1.5 1.5
BRAIN GAIN
+25,500 Dallas/Ft.Worth
+9,500 Minneapolis
+20,900 Houston
+2,300 Detroit
+2,100 Denver
20
0
20 6 Ja
06 nu
20 Feb ary
0 r
20 6 Mauary
0 r
20 6 Ap ch
0 r
20 6 Ma il
BRAIN DRAIN 0 y
20 6 Jun
20 06 Ju e
20 06 A ly
06 ug
20 Sep st u
0
20 6 Octemb
0 t e
20 6 No ober r
06 v
20 Decembe
0
20 7 Ja ember
07 nu r
20 Feb ary
0 r
20 7 Mauary
0 r
20 7 Ap ch
0 r
20 7 Ma il
0 y
20 7 Jun
20 07 Ju e
20 0 7 ly
07 Aug
20 Sep ust
0
20 7 Octemb
0 t e
20 7 No ober r
07 v
20 Decembe
0
20 8 Ja ember
08 nu r
20 Feb ary
0 r
20 8 Mauary
-700 Indianapolis 0 r
20 8 Ap ch
0 r
20 8 Ma il
0 y
20 8 Jun
20 08 Ju e
0
20 8 A ly
- 1,300 Chicago 08 ug
20 Sep ust
0
20 8 Octemb
0 t e
20 8 No ober r
08 v
20 Decembe
0
20 9 Ja ember
- 1,600 Madison, Wisconsin 09 nu r
F
20 eb ary
0 r
20 9 Mauary
0 r
20 9 Ap ch
0 r
number of jobs in major u.s. cities 2012-2016
20 9 Ma il
0 y
20 9 Jun
20 09 Ju e
20 09 A ly
09 ug
20 Sep ust
0
20 9 Octemb
0 t e
20 9 No ober r
09 v
20 Decembe
1
20 0 Janember
10 u r
20 Feb ary
10 ru
20 Mar ary
10 c
20 Apr h
1
20 0 Ma il
10 y
- 4,400 Philadelphia 20 Jun
20 10 Ju e
20 10 Au ly
10 g
20 Sep ust
1
20 0 Octemb
- 5,100 Miami 1 t e
20 0 Nov ober r
10 e
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 1 Jan mbe
11 u r
20 Febr ary
11 u
20 Mar ary
11 c
20 Apr h
1 il
20 1 May
11
20 Jun
20 11 Ju e
20 11 Au ly
11 g
20 Sept ust
1
20 1 Octemb
1 e
20 1 Nov ober r
11 e
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 2 Jan mbe
12 u r
20 Feb ary
12 ru
20 Mar ary
12 c
20 Apr h
1
20 2 Ma il
12 y
20 Jun
- 10,000 Pittsburgh 20 12 Ju e
20 12 Au ly
12 g
20 Sep ust
1
20 2 Octemb
1 t e
20 2 Nov ober r
- 11,200 Los Angeles 12 e
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 3 Jan mbe
13 u r
20 Feb ary
13 ru
20 Mar ary
13 c
20 Apr h
13 il
20 Ma
13 y
20 Jun
20 13 Ju e
20 13 Au ly
13 g
20 Sep ust
1
20 3 Octemb
1 t e
20 3 Nov ober r
13 e
20 Dec mbe
1 r
20 4 Ja embe
14 nu r
20 Feb ary
14 ru
20 Ma ary
14 rch
20 Ap
1 r
20 4 Ma il
14 y
20 Jun
20 14 Ju e
1
20 4 A ly
14 ug
20 Sep ust
1
20 4 Octemb
1 t e
20 4 No ober r
14 ve
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 5 Jan mbe
1 r
20 5 January
1
20 5 Feb uary
15 r
20 Feb uary
15 rua
20 Ma ry
15 r
20 March
1
20 5 Ap ch
15 r
20 April
1 il
20 5 Ma
1 y
20 5 Ma
1 y
20 5 Jun
15 e
20 Jun
1 e
20 5 Jul
20 15 Ju y
1 l
20 5 Au y
20 1 5 g u
1 Au st
20 5 Sep gust
15 t
- 17,200 Boston 20 Sep embe
1 t
20 5 Octember
1
20 5 Oc ober r
1 t
20 5 Nov ober
1
20 5 Novembe
1 r
20 5 Decembe
15 e r
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 6 Jan mbe
16 u r
20 Feb ary
16 ru
20 Mar ary
16 c
20 Apr h
1
20 6 Ma il
16 y
20 Jun
LOS ANGELES
16 e
NEW YORK
CHICAGO
INDIANAPOLIS
SAN FRANCISCO
Jul
y
D.C.
0
Miami
Dallas
4000k
DETROIT 2000k
6000k
8000k
Boston
MINNEAPOLIS Seattle
Phoenix
10000k
Houston
CLEVELAND Columbus
Cincinnati
109
City
Philadelphia
110
CONNECTIVITY WITHOUT BORDERS
160
AIR CARGO REAL ESTATE
SCORE SCORE
140
76.5
120
62.7
100
55.3
MSP
48.4 62.7
38.4
66.9
50.4
DTW
80
ORD
MDW
23.0
53.2 29.2
60
42.3 43.8
CLE
CVG
20
68.1 58.2 61.9 64.2 49.5 62.1 25.5 41.1 53.2 46.9 28.6 26.3
ORD MIA LAX MEM DFW SDF EWR IND ANC JFK OAK ATL
2.
0-5K
5K - 10K
10K - 50K
50K - 80K
80K - 100K
100K - 150K
150K - 200K
200K - 250K
250K - 300K
4. 300K - 415K
433K
741K
1,538K
792K
1,343K
1,460K 206K 223K
206K
570K 288K 102K
12,207K
1,163K 363K
2,393K
MADISON
re-invest in our civic assets
OMAHA
re-inhabit our city
KANSAS CITY
TOPEKA
ST LOUIS
WICHITA
OKLAHOMA CITY
MILWAUKEE
GRAND RAPIDS
KALAMAZOO DETROIT
CHICAGO
TOLEDO
CLEVELAND
FORT WAYNE
COLUMBUS
INDIANAPOLIS DAYTON
BLOOMINGTON
CINCINNATI
LOUISVILLE
tower view from sydney harbor
COMMERCIAL
115
TOWER
DESIGN
COMPETITION
Sydney, Australia
DIAGRAM
1. 2.
121
PLAN
A
3. pedestrian marketplace B
3.
4.
122
FACADE
1. 2.
123
3. north elevation 4. east elevation 5. south elevation 6. west elevation
3. 4. 5. 6.
124
1. multilevel office space
125
PLAN
3. roof terrace
A. open office
A
B. atrium space
C. roof terrace B
2.
3.
view north toward the sydney opera house
“The icons of Sydney—the Harbour Bridge and Opera House—are defined by their
3.
130 “We wanted to pay homage to traditional business practice while
INFORMATION
acknowledging the changes taking place in a modern workforce. A rich material
CLIENT Bentall Kennedy Group palette creates a formal base to support a newly agile work environment.
PLAN
1. level 11
2. level 12
A. reception C D
B. interconnecting stair
C. conference area B
D. upper floor café A
E. lunchroom
1. 2.
131
3. interconnecting stair
132
1. café 3. interconnecting stair + conference area
2. stair detail
1.
2. 3.
133
interconnecting stair + reception
view through breezeway
CORPORATE
137
CORPORATE
AMENITIES BUILDING
FOR CONFIDENTIAL
CLIENT
Texas, USA
CONCEPT
1. massing diagram
building entrance
campus core
139
PLAN
2. level 0
A. visitor drop-off
B. dining + conference center
C. auditorium
D. fitness area
A
140
FACADE
1. entry bridge
141
2. brick texture studies
2.
SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 7 SCHEME
SCHEME 6 9 SCHEME 8
SCHEMESCHEME
5 5 SCHEME 5 SCHEMESCHEME
6 6 SCHEME 6 SCHEMESCHEME
7 7
CONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY
SCHEME 9 SCHEME 9
SCHEMESCHEME
9 9 SCHEME 9
CONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY CONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY HO
CONRADCONRAD
I EXTERIOR
I EXTERIOR
MATERIALITYCONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY
MATERIALITY
3.
142
1. fitness center from north campus
143
2. dining room 4. fitness center
3. lobby
2.
3. 4.
dining deck
1. conference room + adjoining breakout spaces
CORPORATE
147
2. milk bar DAIRY
FARMERS
OF AMERICA
HEADQUARTERS
Kansas City, Kansas, USA
CONCEPT
A. B. C.
D. E. F.
149
2. exterior view
“The inspiration of the project was driven by the desire to celebrate the story of milk from farm to table. Clean, modern elements are
juxtaposed alongside reclaimed materials to reflect and communicate DFA’s global reach while honoring the local dairy farmer.”
1. level 0
A. building reception
B. central three-story stair
C. milk bar
D. serving area + kitchen
E. work café
F. multipurpose rooms
G. fitness center
H. outdoor courtyard
I. bocce ball court
D
J. outdoor meeting rooms
K. interview rooms C
L. open workspace
B F
A E
H
L
K
J
I
153
2. level 1 4. ground floor concept diagram
4.
2.
5.
3.
boardroom in open configuration, maximizing space flexibility to host events
156
1. second-floor living room overlooking main lobby
157
2. open, family-style meeting room is located at each floor’s stair landing 3. open workspace includes demountable private offices
4. open workspace
3.
4.
2.
central stair + adjoining work café
double-height workspace
CORPORATE
161
DENTSU
AEGIS
NETWORK
OFFICE
Los Angeles, California, USA
CONCEPT
1. 2.
165
3. ground-floor pantry
3.
166
1. main pantry
167
2. lounge looking toward pantry
DALLAS OFFICE
Dallas Office
Denver Office
Dark and light woods echo the forest, with charcoal-stained oak
DESIGN PRINCIPAL Peter Sloan, AIA symbolizing the deeper tones of the forest floor. The use of color
reinforces the contrast between darkness and light, creating a
dynamic found in nature. Various shades of green, yellow and
Dallas: 63,000 sq. ft. / 5,850 sq. m. blue simulate the colors found in evergreens, aspen leaves and
Denver: 86,600 sq. ft. / 7,990 sq. m. the sky.
DALLAS PLAN
1. level 21
D
A. reception
B. central stair
C. hospitality lounge E
D. conference center
E. rooftop terrace
F. attorney workspace F
A B
171
2. multistory volume at central stair + view of casual caucus room
conference rooms were pulled inboard to connect hospitality spaces
to an outside terrace + views of dallas’s skyline
174
1. central stair + reception lobby 2. work café
2.
1. 3.
175
4. client hospitality area with views of downtown dallas
DENVER OFFICE
“Our design approach builds on Polsinelli’s national brand to create spaces that are both uniquely modern and
3. level 22
A. reception desk
B. central stair
C. main lobby
D. feature wall
E. roof terrace
F. hospitality lounge
G. attorney workspace
D
C
3.
2.
180
1. lobby outside multipurpose rooms
181
2. central stair section 3. central stair
3.
182
1. client hospitality lounge
183
2. main reception 4. custom feature wall in collaboration with amy ellingson
3. boardroom
2. 4.
3.
1. reception with connecting stair + coffee / wine bar
CORPORATE
185
2. smoked metal + glass stair with leather wrapped panel wall WHITE &
CASE
OFFICE
New York, New York, USA
PLAN
1. level 50
B C
A
A. multipurpose rooms
B. reception below
C. knowledge center
I
D. fitness center
E. wellness center
F. lounge / wine bar
H
G. casual dining
E
H. servery F D
I. display kitchen G
187
2. reception looking east to the concierge desk + to
the knowledge center
conference breakout space + historic artifacts display
190
1. typical practice floor office pantry
191
2. typical practice floor open collaboration
192
1. knowledge center looking into the reading room
1.
“As a leading international law firm, White & Case wanted a first-class executive conference center that fosters social and 193
professional networking. Building on that idea, we enhanced the visitor and staff experience by connecting the top two
floors and creating a dramatic reception. We also developed a diverse amenity program. The space is a beautiful balance
of natural textures and polish, reflecting light throughout the day and night.”
2.
194
1. lounge + wine bar doubles as small event space 2. casual dining with end grain wood flooring +
large oak pivot doors open to the lounge
195
1. view from southeast at dusk
CULTURAL
197
2. aerial view AL
FOZAN
3. inner courtyard + daily prayer hall
MOSQUE
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia
3.
198
INFORMATION
CONCEPT
2. design inspiration
1.
2.
199
3. site plan
200
DRAWING
1. level 0
E C
F D
1.
2.
201
3. level 1
G. women’s worship
H. ablution
I. mep
J. al fozan offices
K. imam’s residence
I
J
3.
4.
202
1. the patterned facade glows at night, creating a beacon in the landscape
“The nautilus form pays homage to the site’s adjacency to the sea. It is referential to
forms found in nature, with a spiraling geometry that indicates a center point from
which all movement radiates out. The form also references the crescent moon of
2. 4.
3.
aerial view at night
front entry approach looking south from 29th street
CULTURAL
207
NILE
VALLEY
AQUAPONICS
FACILITY
Kansas City, Missouri, USA
CONCEPT
2. sketch diagrams
1. 2.
209
3. view inside harvest house of tilapia pond and orchard
210
1. community plaza 3. aerial view
1.
2. 3.
211
4. community raised beds + approach
the harvest.”
4.
5.
“Viewed from the city, the stone facades block
1. view from the gulf
the intense desert sun and reflect the solidity and
1. northeast elevation
215
2. main entrance
216
1. north elevation 2. southeast elevation
217
3. banking hall entrance
218
1. main entrance reception
219
2. reception waiting area 3. auditorium
2. 3.
1. southeast view
HEALTHCARE
221
2. historic university campus CENTER FOR
ACADEMIC MEDICINE
3. massing concept sketch
FOR CONFIDENTIAL
CLIENT
California, USA
2. 3.
222
INFORMATION
CLIENT Confidential
1.
223
1. concept models
Pro
je
Sit ct
e
Arboretum
2.
224
LANDSCAPE
site plan
A
A. eucalyptus grove
B. oak woodland B
C. entry plaza
D. porch
E. multiuse lawn
F. courtyard
G. terrace C
H. arboretum overlook
I. bay tree grove
J. trx
K. stormwater
L. service court
M. café patio
N. ramp to garage
F D
G
I
L M
K
B
J N
Oak Woodlands - Trees
225
FLORA auercus agrifolia - coast live oak
(not shown)
quercus lobata - valley oak
quercus doublasii - blue oak
quercus wislizenii - interior live oak
pinus torreyana - torrey pine
aesculus californica - california buckey
Ericameria linearifolia Arctostaphylos
arbutus unedo glauca
- strawberry tree
woodland trees Interior Goldenbush Big Berry Manzanita
woodland understories
(not shown)
native grass + wildflowers
graxinus uhdei - orange county evergreen ash
Pinus torreyana Cercis occidentalis quercus agrifolia - coast
Bloom in spring Aesculus californica
live oak
Torrey Pine Western Redbud muhlenbergia dubia - pine muhly California buckeye
Native Grasses w/ Wildflowers carex divulsa - berkeley sedge
salvia spathacea - hummingbird sage
urban garden
(not shown)
lavandula - goodwin creek lavender
erigeron karvinskianus - santa barbara daisy
carex divulsa - berkeley sedge
calamintha nepeta - lesser calamint
lupinus albifrons - silver bush lupine
penstemon margarita bop - foothill penstemon
achillea filipendulina - yarrow
courtyard
Like the Gates of Janus in ancient Rome, the center for academic medicine The entrance lobby creates a gateway in four directions: north-south and
acts as a gate with multiple functions: from past to future, from historical east-west. A south-facing balcony overlooks the main campus and frames
campus to new medical school campus, and from university grounds to the the grand entry porch. These elements will become aspirational icons and
arboretum. landmarks for the expanding medical school campus.
The courtyard allows the arboretum to flow through the buildings toward The building’s access and collaborative zones occur at the corners and ends
the medical school hospitals. The narrow architectural forms grant efficient of the wings. The main entrance lobby and principal collaborative spaces
access to daylight and natural ventilation, serving as a connection to nature. are stacked along the southwest corner closest to the historic campus.
Conceived as a large hall overlooking the campus, this space will function as
A pinwheel rotation introduced to the wings embraces the dynamic site a central collaborative destination for the medical faculty.
conditions. This provides directionality, hierarchy and opportunities for
diverse outdoor spaces. Small gaps and extensions to the wings produce
and project the pinwheel effect along the vertical organization. The implicit
ground-level rotation is slightly different than the rotation at upper levels,
increasing the sense of movement.
227
2. model view of northeast elevation
2.
3.
228
SUSTAINABILITY
2. passive ventilation
external
2.
229
3. response to climate
3.
4.
230
1. southwest view of courtyard
Built above a parking structure, the courtyard is accessed from under the great The courtyard, which can be accessed from both the west and south, is
hovering west volume—a porch-like space that will host a range of functions and surrounded by activity. Faculty, students and staff from the more public north
frame a generous opening to the courtyard and arboretum. The courtyard features wing will be drawn to the space and its restaurant, auditorium and gymnasium.
a large ovoid lawn bound by a meandering path to the arboretum. Flanked by The walkways overlook the courtyard and allow for outdoor access while bridges
trees and shrubs of local species, this path extends the arboretum plants into the traverse its edges. Completely open to the arboretum, the courtyard is a visual
courtyard. and experiential vestibule to nature.
231
2. east view of courtyard looking toward arboretum
232
1. view from west
An enveloping strategy allays the horizontal proportions, directionality and proportioned cutouts that expose an inner layer of glass. The west bar
implicit rotation of the building’s volumes. Long sequences of repetitive articulates an expanded version of the layered facades. An additional layer
vertical elements are carefully adapted to the facade’s specific condition. of aluminum blades provides shading. A longer overhang recalls the pattern
The subtle, rotating architecture hovers above ground—except at the of articulated rooftops on the existing campus.
northwest corner, where it is rooted in the earth in a wide, terra-cotta plinth.
The diaphanous facades along the courtyard are more detailed and take
The long, hovering limestone volumes open to the landscape as balconies advantage of the climate and outdoor amenities. On the south facade, a
and terraces. The stone volumes are expressed as planes with vertical landscaped walkway provides solar shading.
233
2. facade from main road
breakout space
Design Principal
1. community hospital multi-bed tower
HEALTHCARE
237
2. acute care hospital NG TENG FONG
GENERAL AND JURONG
COMMUNITY HOSPITALS
Jurong, Singapore
CONCEPT
1. 2.
239
3. patient ward
integrated sustainable strategies
242
hospital greening strategy
H C
B
G
F D E A
A. vertical planting
F. sky gardens
D. patient wards
G. therapeutic garden
patient tower forms one of the focal points on Jurong’s townscape. We also developed an urban design strategy using the
hospital campus as part of a new greenway connecting two existing green corridors and weaving hospital in access to the
transportation networks.”
1.
CONCEPT
2.
251
3. large private dining room
252
1. dining room 2. rope wall
1. 2.
253
3. bar
churrascaria + dining + bar
“The interior character pays homage to the owner’s first restaurant experience in the Brazilian countryside and fuses rural
JACOB K. JAVITS
CONVENTION CENTER
DESIGN COMPETITION
New York, New York, USA
A. ballroom
B. meeting rooms
C. exposition hall
e
av
h
12t
3. massing concepts
expo space
prefunction
existing building
marshalling
back of house
pavilion
BOH
GREEN ROOF
MARSHALLING
2.
EXISTING NEW
BOH
MARSHALLING
3.
INDICATIVE
INDICATIVE
DESIGN
DESIGN ALT.
ALT.1 1 ALT.
ALT.22
262
CONCEPT 3. shifted for program + views
1.
2. 3.
263
4. massing elements 5. massing elements
A B C D E F
4. 5.
264
FACADE
T SOLAR
T SOLAR ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
T SOLAR
T SOLAR ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
eas
sionon
sion its facade
structure
structure has limited
has limited glazed
glazed areas
areas onon its
its facade
facade
eas on its facade
eas
sion
eas on
on its
its facade
structure
facade has limited
limitedof glazed areas ononTheits facade
facade
eding.
e programThe
program program
requirements the building.
building. program
500 KWH/M2
sion
ding. structure has
requirements
The program ofglazed
the areas its
The program
dd ding.
eatrium
ding.
facadeThe
program
The program
requirements
program
spaces
include the main
mainof ofentry
the building.
building.
and atrium
atrium The program
spaces
de atrium
program
facade requirements
include
spaces the the
entry and The program
spaces
d
dddthatrium
facade
atrium
meeting
south,
facade thespaces
include
spaces rooms the main
pre-function
include the main entryatand
spaces
entry and
both atrium
meeting
atrium spaces
spacesrooms
outh, the pre-function
th meeting rooms spaces at both meeting rooms
a faceted surface that by virtue of its angles and self-shading reduce in-
th meeting rooms
from the meeting room and ballroom spaces. In addition smaller areas
glazing and facade design strategies that mitigate impact of direct and
impact of solar radiation must also allow for natural daylight and views
mainly due to the program requirements of the building. The program
south,
th the
meeting pre-function
rooms spaces at both meeting rooms
radiation on the glazed surface. The south facing glazed areas employ
facing window
All of these areas combined still comprise of only about 30% of glazed
vels facing south and thethe largeat west facing window
cident solar radiation on the facade. In addition to the design, the use
facing east and south, the pre-function spaces at both meeting rooms
through the glazed facade, our design ensures daylight availability for
outh, the pre-function spaces both meeting rooms
A major concern for solar radiation transmission was the west facing
in-direct solar radiation, we are able to reduce the actual solar trans-
The Javits expansion structure has limited glazed areas on its facade
and ballroom levels facing south and the large west facing window
dition
g room smaller
and areas
ballroom spaces. addition areas
areas with glazed facade include the main entry and atrium spaces
Its important to note that the facade design although must reduce
els facing south and large west facing window
window for the ballroom and meeting room areas. Our proposed
dition
design provides for a deep inset glazing with over 10 feet of over-
dition
gg room
dition
deck
ng north
room smaller
and
smaller
are glazed.
adjacentareasto the
ballroom
areas spaces.
greenIn Inroof
addition
deck are smaller
are glazed.areas
ng deck areand
north ballroom
adjacent
glazed. to thespaces.
green addition
roof deck smaller
glazed.areas
ngsdeck
ng
deck
bout are
north
30%
combined
north glazed.
adjacent
areadjacent
glazed.
of glazed
still to the
the green
comprise
to green
of roof
only
roof deck30%
about
deck are glazed.
are glazed.
of glazed
s combined
bout 30% of stillglazedcomprise of only about 30% of glazed
bout
sfacade
bout 30%
combined
30%
sgh-performance
combined of still
of
area. glazed
still
glazedcomprise of
Furthermore,
comprise ofusing
only about
only about 30%30% of
high-performance of glazed
glazed
facade area.
gh-performance Furthermore, using high-performance
gh-performance
facade
facadedesignarea.
gh-performance
mpact
de of direct
area. Furthermore,
and
strategies
Furthermore,that using high-performance
mitigate
using high-performance
impact of direct and
de design
mpact strategies
of direct and that mitigate impact of direct and
mpact
de design
mpact
ctual
diation,
de ofwe
design
of
solar direct
direct
trans- and to
strategies
and
are able
able that mitigate
reduce impactsolar
theVIEW-
actual of direct
direct
trans-and
westrategies that mitigate impact of and
INCIDENT SOLAR ANALYSIS
diation,
ctual solar are
trans- to reduce SE
the actual INCIDENT
solar SOLAR
trans- RADIATION-
SE WINTER
SE VIEW-
VIEW- (DEC -SOLAR
INCIDENT
INCIDENT MAR) RADIATION-
SOLAR SW VIEW - INCIDENT SOLAR
WINTER (DEC
(DEC RADIATION-
-- MAR)
MAR) WINTER
SW VIEW
VIEW (DEC -SOLAR
-- INCIDENT
INCIDENT MAR) RADIATION- WINTER (DEC - MAR)
SOLAR
ctual
diation,
ctual solar
solar trans-
wetrans-
are able toto reduce
reduce SE
winterVIEW-
theVIEW- INCIDENT
actualINCIDENT
solar trans- SOLAR RADIATION-
trans- WINTER (DEC - MAR) RADIATION- WINTER
SW VIEW - INCIDENT SOLAR SW
RADIATION-
winter WINTER (DEC - MAR) RADIATION- WINTER (DEC - MAR)
the glazed
diation,glazed
we facade.
are able SE
the
SE actual
VIEW- solar
INCIDENT SOLAR
SOLAR RADIATION-
RADIATION-
SE WINTER
SE VIEW-
VIEW-
WINTER (DEC
(DEC --SOLAR
INCIDENT
INCIDENT MAR)
SOLAR SW
SW VIEW
VIEW -- INCIDENT
RADIATION-
MAR) RADIATION- INCIDENT
WINTER SOLAR
WINTER (DEC
(DEC
SOLAR RADIATION-
-- MAR)
MAR)
RADIATION-
SW WINTER
SW VIEW
VIEW
WINTER (DEC
(DEC --SOLAR
-- INCIDENT
INCIDENT MAR)
SOLAR RADIATION- WINTER
MAR) RADIATION- WINTER (DEC
(DEC -- MAR)
MAR)
the facade.
the glazed
the glazed facade.
facade.
on Mitigation:
on Mitigation:
on Mitigation:
250
ssOurthesolar
for
the
ballroom westradiation
solar
west
proposedfacing
radiation
facing
and meeting transmission
room areas. wasOur
areas. theproposed
west facing
facing
0
ght
gh note
note
gh
must
must& Views:
that
thatreduce
the facade
the
reduce
facade design
design although
although must
must reduce
reduce
gh
gh note must
must
daylight
adiation
note thatreduce
thatreduce
the facade
and
must
the facade
views design
also allow
allow although
for natural
design natural
although must reduce
daylight
must reduce
and views
views
adiation
daylight must
and also
views for daylight and
r..daylight
adiation
daylight and
and views
must
transmission
While
adiation reducing
must alsothe
views
also allow for natural
impact
allow for natural
of solardaylight and views
transmission
daylight
While reducing the impact of solar transmission and views
r transmission
.rred
zed transmission
. transmission
While
ght
While
ght
reducing
availability
facade,
reducing
facade, our
availability
the impact
forthe
our design
design ensures
for impact
ensures
ofdaylight
of solar transmission
solar transmission
daylight availability for
availability for
zed
sed ght
ght
of theavailability
facade,
facade, our
availability
providing largefor
design
for space
pre-function
our design ensures
as
ensures daylight
well as availability
providing
daylight large
availability for
for
sof the pre-function
providing large space as well as providing large
ssof providing
of the
providing
skyline and large
pre-function
large
the
the pre-function space
river. as well as providing large
skyline and the river.space as well as providing large
skyline and
skyline and the
the river.
river.
“The design of the massing and facades for the proposed expansion of the Javits Center was derived from an adaption of the
original Javits curtain wall design. The original Pei Cobb Freed convention center celebrated the latest in glass curtain wall
technology available in 1986―similar to London’s Crystal Palace of 1850. Our proposal adapts the current massing and
facades from the original 1986 structure―three decades later―while reimagining a glass building
using today’s glass technologies. This creates a new dynamic entry and integrates the expansion
2.
3.
aerial view
270
1. green roof + new marshalling garage
271
2. ballroom 4. view of circulation from meeting rooms
2. 4.
3.
view of new entrance from 11th ave
1. main entry through the civic plaza
JUSTICE
275
2. early concept model expressing facade articulation DAVIDSON COUNTY
CRIMINAL
3. massing study of building
JUSTICE
CENTER
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
3.
276
INFORMATION
ELEVATION
A. plaza
B. entry lobby
C. visitation
D. work-release
E. lockers + gym
F. dayrooms
G. outdoor recreation yard
F
G
C
C
A B
F
UP
E G
D
281
2.
3.
282
DRAWING
1. west elevation
2. north-south section
1.
2.
283
284
1. west facade articulation from 3rd avenue
285
2. view into public rain gardens
civic plaza engages the community
“The success of the design for the Davidson Justice Center lies in the resolution of contemporary
attitudes of detention with the demands and expectations of significant civic urban buildings.”
CONCEPT
1.
2.
“The clean aesthetics and scale of the architectural structure foster interaction and
CLIENT Confidential
SECTION
A. entrance
B. parking
C. amenity
D. residential
A
299
2. garage + amenity space
300
CONCEPT
“The design investigates a new paradigm for urban housing and a redefined utility of the urban elevated garage
A. 4-bedroom unit
B. 2-bedroom unit
C. 3-bedroom unit
D. studio unit
C
303
2. level 0 3. level 4 4. level 25 roof
R
G
J
N
Q
L
E H I M O
F K
N
P
2. 3. 4.
aerial view
RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN
COMPETITION
New York, New York, USA
CONCEPT
“The new development visually anchors the neighborhood with an elegant tower
2.
1.
3. typical floor with side core
H I
3.
4.
312
1. west elevation 2. street view
1. 2.
313
3. view from east river looking north
view from east river looking south
1. gateway to the campus
1.
SCIENCE +
TECHNOLOGY
317
EDUCATION
BUILDING
FOR CONFIDENTIAL
CLIENT
California, USA
2.
318 “The design team set out to demonstrate our process and ability to harness cross-
INFORMATION
disciplinary thinking. Our process adapted the university’s research philosophy
CLIENT Confidential of thinking, observing, making and testing. The proposal embodies dualities of
CONCEPT
2. level 3 + level 4
A C
D
H
G
F
E
320
SITE STRATEGY 2. building concepts
1. site concepts
1. 2.
321
3. gateway + heart 4. pathways
3. 4.
322
MODEL 2. view across canyon
2.
3.
1.
4.
323
5. a new campus heart
324
1. interior activity hub
325
2. typical studio work space
2.
3.
1. view of main entrance from midland road
SCIENCE +
TECHNOLOGY
327
2. main east-west atrium THE
FRANCIS
CRICK
INSTITUTE
London, UK
DESIGN PRINCIPAL Larry Malcic, AIA The significant technical challenges of building on this
DESIGN TEAM LEADER David King, RIBA urban site required design measures that prevented
vibration and electromagnetic interference from local rail,
SCIENCE LEADER Bill Odell, AIA subway and truck traffic.
CONCEPT
1. design evolution
329
2. proximity + visibility are critical: between write-up + lab, lab + lab,
wings of the building + floors
330
SITE
context map
F
I
G
332
CONCEPT
1. massing strategy
A. B.
C.
D. E.
333
2. study model in site context
aerial view of the crick
©Laing O’Rourke
336
PLAN
1. level 0
B
F
A. public entrance
B. employee entrance
A
C. service entrance
E
D. lecture theater
E. exhibition space
F. teaching lab for children
H
G. informal meeting
H. seminar suite D
I. dining area
J. kitchen
K. servery
L. coffee bar + pub
M. community facility G
N. garden
L
O. public walkway
I K O
B
N M
337
2. level 1
P. wet lab
Q
Q. informatics
R. administration support
S. informal meeting
T. write-up areas
U. central stairs
V. cell lab
T
W. histopathology
T P P
X. flow cytometry
Y. high throughput screening
X
Y
P T
P
T
Q Q
W
V
view from lab write-ups toward central collaboration space
340
SECTION
A. labs
B. mechanical
C. atrium
D. entrance
E. auditorium
F. loading bay
C C
E F D
D
B
A
B
A
341
2. glazing to transverse atrium 3. ground floor central collaboration space
3.
2. 4.
342
ATRIUM
2.
3. 4.
344
LABORATORY
4. view from a write-up area with primary lab, shared support + mirrored
layout beyond
3.
2. 4.
ground floor view of auditorium + atrium
“Science is constantly evolving and therefore requires a highly collaborative environment to facilitate scientific
breakthroughs. We are delighted that our holistic design solutions will aid in these new discoveries and keep London at
3.
350 “Engaging the building plan and section into a synchronous design of simple
INFORMATION
folding planes of glass and vibrant colors, we reimagined how a 1960s
CLIENT Confidential
office building made up of opaque, cast concrete and stone panels could be
CONCEPT
wet
support
wet
circulation
2.
351
PLAN
3. level 0
A. labs
B. specialty lab rooms
C. work stations
D. offices
E. collaboration spaces
F. administration
C E
G. kitchen
H. wellness room
I. open collaboration space
D
A
G I F
B B
E
D
H
I G
A
E C
352
1. phenotype models
2. faculty phenotypes
1.
The team incorporated three of the school’s five faculty phenotype models into the research building. Investigating a wide variety of planning
scenarios enabled the team to create the optimal quantity and mix of wet and dry benches and desks.
2.
2. 3.
360
INFORMATION
CONCEPT
1. concept sketches
361
2. early conceptual building section
362
PLAN 2. diagram illustrating internal atria connectivity
mechanical
vivarium
shell
shell
office
labs
mcom*
mcom*
2.
mcom*
public space
363
3. level 0 4. level 1 5. level 2
D F
4.
C L
A B J
I
3. 5.
364
1. main lobby
365
2. cafeteria 4. west atrium
3. library
2.
3. 4.
366
1. view from channelside
“The design provides the university with a setting for a new way of
2.
370
INFORMATION 2. site plan
CONCEPT
1. concept diagram
371
B
B
B
G
372
1. aerial perspective looking east
373
2. seating views looking downtown
3. street-level approach
2.
3.
field level view of home team stands
“This project hearkened back to the original sports venues and how they were sited by using the natural topography and folding
the stadium’s natural bowl shape into an existing landscape. Unlike the ancients, however, who found hills and natural forms to
work with, our team discovered that repurposing the site of a highway interchange created the opportunity for a natural bowl.
By fitting the stadium into the local context and removing acres of barriers in the old highway network, we were able to connect
the fabric of the city with this new development. The final move is a gentle tilt to the east, shading the bowl and honoring views
1.2 million sq. ft. / 111,480 sq. m. Renovations for 2017 included comprehensive
updates to all existing premium spaces on the
200 Club and 200 Mezzanine Suite levels and
annual EUI: 28.5 kBtu/sf/yr distinct new designs for the sideline and end zone
45% below ASHRAE 2007 suites. Club interiors, designed in collaboration
with Rockwell Group, were refreshed to support
the Dolphins’ approach to the fan experience.
PLAN
A. support column
B. mast
C. circulation ramps A
D. open concourse
E. escalators
E
379
2. seating bowl
380
1. north club
381
2. public art in concourse 4. north club food + beverage
2.
3. 4.
382
1. structural drawing of mast
A
A. upper node
B. tension support cable
C. the mast
D. etfe membrane
E. roof steel
F. lower node
G. tension bracing
H. concrete support column
I. upper concourse
F
I
383
2. mast
SECTION
“The original stadium lacked identity and an architectural presence. We addressed this by
creating an expansive and iconic shade structure. This elegant open-air canopy, which was
erected in just seven months, includes more than 17,000 tons of steel and covers more than
AVIATION + TRANSPORTATION LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal B New York, New York, USA 12
Peter Ruggiero (Design Principal) Gerard DeZern
Marie Achalabun Kholisile Dhliwayo
Amir Aghajani Saad Dimachkieh
Roosevelt Alexandre Gregory DiRienzo
Zahra Ali Koriey Dixon
Marcus Allen George Dolidze
Abdulaziz Almobarak Julie Donovan
Robert Asselin Madeleine French
Paul Auguste Carl Galioto
Cindy Bang Yu Gao
Tom Bayer Cid Garcia
Stephen Beacham Hyeongmo Goo
Matthew Breidenthal Apoorv Goyal
Jose Briones Raul Guerrero
Ashlee Broadus Pawel Gurdak
John Brocato Meredith Hall
Bart Butler Nancy Hamilton
Yuhong Cao Lawson Hanna
Jeremy Charmchizadeh Mark Hendel
Dany Chehade Brian Henkel
Robert Chicas Adriana Hernandez
Ilya Chistiakov Julia Heutel
James Christerson Eli Hoisington
Mario Claussnitzer Alyssa Horn
Leesa Coller Kyle Ingber
Peter Costanzo Julie Janeo
Ashley Craig Nathan Janicek
Steven Danielpour Justin Jennings
Benjamin Denker Naomi Katlowitz
Devki Desai Hiroyuki Kawakami
Eunil Kim Juyoung Park
Joo Young Kim Jack Parker
Varun Kohli Amy Patel
Komal Kotwal Nishiel Patel
Aman Krishan George Pavlovski
Gary Kuzma Jennifer Pittenger
OChong Kwon Mark Pritchard
Joanna Lam Courtney Robinson
Lamar Lane Alejandro Rodriguez
Julian Lawson Rene Ruiz
Edward Ledoux Roberto Saldarriaga
Kanoknart (Noon) Leelardchareon Adriana Sangeorzan
Zifan Liu John Santoro
Christopher Lodge Meiko Sato
Eugene Lund Gregory Schleusner
Shawn Lutz Darko Sefic
Al Lyons Jeannette Segal
H. (Anu) Mahendra Mohammed Shuaib
Donald Marmen Simon Shim
Marissa Martorana Satomi Shimamura
Glenn McCann Francisco Silva
Charles McGrail Michael Smith
Katherine McPhillips Julie Somarriba
Francesca Meola Erica Srolovitz
Michael Miller Jacquelyn Suozzi
Oritsegbegbemi Nanna Amer Taghlebi
Alexander Nash Jiasi Tan
Sergio Navarro Giacomo Tinari
John Neary Enrico Tomassoli
Edgar Nunnelly Diana Ton
Anastasios Papadopoulos Abbeylane Torres
DESIGN TEAMS (CONT.)
New LaGuardia Airport Master Plan New York, New York, USA 38
Gregory Cranford (Design Principal) James Mallory
Matt Breidenthal Francesca Meola
Javier Buscaglia-Pesquera Daniel Ng
Kenneth Drucker Aneirin Owens
Anne Fletcher Isaac Plumb
Ely Fretz Casey Renner
Carl Galioto Maria Salazar
Lucy Gross Simon Shim
Marc Gross Jiasi Tan
William Jenkinson Patrick Vokaty
Kooho Jung Justin Warner
Nicolas Libeyre Zhaoyan Zheng
COMMERCIAL 1101 16th Street NW Washington, DC, USA 54
Bill Hellmuth (Design Principal) Emillio Stokes
Mateusz Gawad Esther Wang
Chloe Hiyu Joe Winters
The Allen Mixed-Use Development Houston, Texas, USA 64
Roger Soto (Design Principal) Raul Guerrero
Kathrin Brunner Jenny Qualls
Zach Christeson Joseph Wilfong
Jarrett Ewing
Ghirardelli Square Plaza San Francisco, California, USA 78
Brian Jencek (Design Principal) Xue Ling
Minyoung Choi Arthur Morrissey
Kathy Doi Beau Pesa
Joon Kim Robin Roderick
Ben Kuchinsky Joseph Schneider
CORPORATE (CONT.) Corporate Amenities Building for Confidential Client Texas, USA 136
Roger Soto (Design Principal) Noon Leelardcharoen
Cindy Bang Wendy Niziol
Kathrin Brunner Joseph Wilfong
Dairy Farmers of America Headquarters Kansas City, Kansas, USA 146
Peter Sloan (Design Principal) Mark O’Hara
Jake Baker Zachary O’Keefe
Lynn Carlton Sandy Price
Adam Guzman Molly Smith
Eric Linebarger Tracy Stewart
JJ Nicolas Bridget Sturr
HEALTHCARE Center for Academic Medicine for Confidential Client California, USA 220
Paul Woolford (Design Principal) So Young Lee
Julia Cooper Ali Nasiri
Tom Fortier Ryan Nearman
Emily Fowlkes Chris Patneau
Daniel Herriott Kyle Prenzlow
Michele Hutchinson Philip Ra
Brian Jencek Ali Sedaqat
Tom Kaczkowski Rotimi Seriki
Randy Kray David Vogel
Ben Kuchinsky LiYan Yang
Minji Lee
DESIGN TEAMS (CONT.)
HEALTHCARE (CONT.) Ng Teng Fong General and Jurong Community Hospitals Jurong, Singapore 236
Henry Chao (Design Principal) Shiva Mendez
Mara Baum William Roger
Michael Gould Paul Woolford
Brian Jencek
HOSPITALITY Fogo de Chao Brazilian Steakhouse San Francisco, California, USA 248
Daniel Herriott (Design Principal) Anne Pradenas
Dimitri Avdienko Tambra Thorson
Casey Hagen
Jacob K. Javits Convention Center Design Competition New York, New York, USA 256
Kenneth Drucker (Design Principal) Nathan Hoofnagle
Claudia Conde Varun Kohli
Shayna Cooper Marina Mazin
Carl Galioto Marie-Paule Petitjean
Apoorv Goyal Maria Salazar
Greg Green Harsha Sharma
Marc Gross
JUSTICE Davidson County Criminal Justice Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA 274
Peter Ruggiero (Design Principal) Sue Kim
Julie (Hyun Jung) Cho Nareg Kurtjian
Gregory Cook Jourdon Miller
Jeff Davis Cory Murner
Fred Goebel Lou Oswald
Jeff Goodale George Pavlovski
Gerry Guerrero Casey Renner
Dan Hartmann Bob Schwartz
Larry Hlavacek Patrick Vokaty
Yongbeom Ji
PRODUCT DESIGN Scientific Lab Furniture System 288
Matthew Hern (Design Principal) Ami Shah
Virginia Byers Gordon Stratford
Susan Grossinger
RESIDENTIAL 633 S. LaSalle Street Tower Chicago, Illinois, USA 296
Peter Ruggiero (Design Principal) Gaute Grindheim
Allison Burrell Lou Oswald
Javier Buscaglia-Pesquera Domenic Salpietra
Ashley Craig Dan Sullivan
Sutton Place Design Competition New York, New York, USA 304
Kenneth Drucker (Design Principal) John MacCallum
Anne Fletcher James Mallory
Kooho Jung Elizabeth Weintraub
SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY Education Building for Confidential Client California, USA 316
Ernest Cirangle (Design Principal) Brian Jencek
Ashley Craig Randy Kray
Robert Cull Ken Sumner
Jessica Ginther LiYan Yang
DESIGN TEAMS (CONT.)
SPORTS + RECREATION + Major League Soccer Stadium St. Louis, Missouri, USA 368
ENTERTAINMENT Eli Hoisington (Design Principal) Arno Sandoval
Chris DeVolder Andrew Zell
SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY Education Building for Confidential Client Steve Parker 316
The Francis Crick Institute Chris Ansell, Paul Grundy 326
Medical Research Building for Confidential Client Bruce Damonte 348
University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine ATCHAIN 358