Chapter I

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

The Sultan Kudarat State University has a Student Body Organization that aims to

promote better understanding and unity among the SKSU students who belong to

different tribes or culture, develop appreciation for moral and spiritual values and to

provide training for leadership through its various social, educational and cultural

programs and activities.

The institution, Sultan Kudarat State University Tacurong City Campus, responds

to it and annually elects Student Body Organizations Officer to achieve its aims.

The Student Body Organization Officers basically performs the following tasks

towards the students: Student Relations, Dissemination of Information, Organizing

School Activities, Application Student Services and Project Implementation. These

services are the primary basis to determine their Efficiency and Effects of the SBO

Officers to the Students.

1
Objectives of the Study

The objectives of the study are to determine the efficiency of the SBO Officers, its

effects on the Student at Sultan Kudarat State University Tacurong City Campus and

their significant relationship.

1. To determine the efficiency of the SBO Officers in terms of:

1.1 Student Relations

1.2 Dissemination of Information

1.3 Organizing School Activities

1.4 Application of Student Services

1.5 Project Implementation

2. To determine the effects of the SBO Officers efficiency in terms of:

2.1 Student Relations

2.2 Dissemination of Information

2.3 Organizing School Activities

2.4 Application of Student Services

2.5 Project Implementation

3. To determine the relationship between the efficiency of SBO Officers and its

effects on the students.

2
Significance of the Study

The study is of great importance since it seeks for the improvement of Student

Leadership at Sultan Kudarat State University Tacurong City Campus. This is done by

determining the Efficiency of the highest student leaders in the campus (Student Body

Organization Officers, SBO) from three (3) different leadership terms (2008-2009, 2009-

2010 and 2010-2011). After determining, the researcher finds the area where the student

leaders need improvement and suggest better strategies in their performances for the

development of the future student leaders.

Scope and Delimitation of the Study

The researcher’s study is determining the Efficiency of the SBO Officers and its

Effects on the Students at Sultan Kudarat State University, Tacurong City Campus

academic year 2008-2011.

Time and Place of the Study

The study was conducted January 2012 at Sultan Kudarat State University

Tacurong City Campus.

3
 Definition of Terms

The following terms used in the study of the SBO Officers in SKSU Tacurong

City Campus.

Dissemination of Information refers on how the SBO Officers distribute information to

the students inside the campus.

Effects refer to the result of the efficiency of SBO officers of SKSU-Tacurong City

Campus. Example: Actual Filled-up Survey Questionnaire no. 99 B.

EFFECTS, statement 2.b- Officers and Students have complete attendance

during the events in the campus. This statement was rated with 5 which

describe as Always or Highly Effective (pg.47).

Efficiency refers to the degree of effectiveness of SBO Officers in achieving their desired

results with minimum expenditures of energy, time, money or materials.

Example: Actual Filled-up Survey Questionnaire no. 99 A. EFFICIENCY,

statement 2.e- Officers check attendance of students every meeting. This

statement was rated with 5 which describe as Always or Highly Efficient

(pg.45).

Project Implementation refers to the enactment of projects agreed by the SBO Officers.

4
SBO Student Body Organization, refers to the organization where in the students leaders

involve in the study is officiated.

SBO Officers refers to a group of student leaders under the office of the Student Body

Organization SKSU Tacurong City Campus.

School Activities refers to athletic and socio-cultural; events/programs in the campus

organized/facilitated by SBO Officers.

SKSU Sultan Kudarat State University refers to the State University proclaimed January

2010 formerly known as SKPSC (Sultan Kudarat Polytechnic State

College), located in Sultan Kudarat.

SKSU Tacurong Campus refers to one of the pioneering campus of SKPSC now SKSU

and the place where this study is conducted.

Student Relations refers to the interaction between the SBO Officers and Student

Population in the application of dissemination of information, organizing

of school activities, student services and project implementation.

Student Services refers to services rendered by the SBO officers to the students.

Tacurong City refers to the component city of Sultan Kudarat and the location of SKSU-

Tacurong City Campus.

5
 Chapter II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

WORKERS EFFICIENCY

Self-efficiency it is the use of one’s abilities in order to bring optimum results

with least waste and stain. Self-efficiency refers to self awareness and self-development

to realize one’s aspiration. In self-efficiency, the worker independently tends to discover

his potentialities and fully enhance them which redound not only to his own benefit but to

the benefit of others as well.

Social or Group Efficiency, refers to human relations connoting good teamwork

and social efficiency. Getting along with your fellow workers as you perform your job

within and outside the organization fosters work efficiency (Ramirez and Beltran, 2004).

EMPHASIS ON SOCIAL EFFICIENCY

People who succeeded in business, politics and profession have been found to

have dependent much on their ability to deal with people. The cultivation of appropriate

behavior in the organization and the community has been the key to moving upward in

social and economic terms. The effectiveness of the individual in general has been based

on having the competence in human relations just as in scientific and technological

ability. The grouping emphasis on the corporate character of business has accentuated

rather than lessened the need for personnel who possess the skills in human relations

which comprise the application of learning in the social sciences (Azanza, 2001).

6
 This efficiency results into the effectiveness of an organization/group that

develops specially on the executive system of the organization.

TRENDS ON ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT

Effective organization requires more and more that the executive system be highly

adaptable. Recognizing the need for adaptability of the organization in a changing society

has resulted in some new practices. First among these is a conscious planned approach to

executive development so that people of appropriate training and proven competence

may be available for assignment to key positions as needed.

Second is the use of the task force or the project form of organization. This

permits the assembly of personnel of a variety of appropriate specialized competence for

assignment to the completion of a specific task or project in its entirety. Such group can

be created and broken up rapidly and without a sense of unfairness on the part on the

individuals concern.

The forgoing two practices have been adopted recently in the Philippines.

Executive development has been given emphasis with the inauguration of the

Development Academy of the Philippines at Tagaytay City. Task forces on development

projects have also been organized on national, regional, provincial, city and municipal

levels.

Thus organization in the future will be more and more flexible as they become

viable to varying needs of the times (Leveriza, 1990).

Trends presented above may also be adapted by the following organization.

7
STUDENT ORGANIZATION

There shall be a Student Body Organization which shall aim to promote better

understanding and unity among the SKPSC students who belong to different tribes or

culture, develop appreciation for moral and spiritual values and to provide training for

leadership through its various social and educational and cultural programs and activities

(SKPSC Handbook, 2004).

CAMPUS STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION

Each campus Student Body Organization shall be composed of the following duly

elected officers in the campus as follows: Governor, Vice-Governor, and eight (8) Board

members.

The qualifications of SBO Officers shall be the following:

Governor – Incoming regular college junior student in 4-year curriculum or senior

student in a 5-year curriculum. Must be a bonafide student of SKSU.

Vice-Governor - Incoming regular college junior student (3rd year in 4-year curriculum)

or senior student 4th year in a 5-year curriculum. Must be a bonafide student of SKSU.

Board Member – incoming 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year in 5 year curriculum regular college

student. Must be a bonafide student of SKSU.

A candidate for graduation or a graduating student (in a 4 or 5 year curriculum) is

not allowed to run in any position.

Any SBO Officers may be elected as officer of other organization except as

mayor or chairman.
8
 Other criteria or requirements may be added by the campus SBO provided it

should not contradict with the rules of USG (SKSU Handbook, 2010).

SBO OFFICERS

S.Y. 2008-2009

Governor: Ronaisa Camendan

Vice-Governor: Nelbert Kulan

Secretary: Karen Sol Angeles Lumogdang

Treasurer: Jeffrech Mecida

Campus Representative: Melba Abid

Board Members: Maricel Albiño Ralph Salmon

Ramon Oca Michael Arenga

Edwin Balmores Princess Grace Cabayao

Sherwin Estil (The Nucleus, 2008)

S.Y. 2009-2010

Governor: Irene Salim/ Deana Diaz

Vice-Governor: Maria Jenalyn Mejia

Treasurer: Joeben Aujero

Campus Representative: Michael Sacapaño

Board Members: Gessa Yu Marvin Antonio

Michael Landero Ralph Salmon

Krystal Gay Tolentino Aizel Celeste

9
 Jonjie Imperio (The Nucleus, 2009)

S.Y. 2010-2011

Governor: Jaime Eliarda

Vice-Governor: Jose Decena III

Secretary: Gay Flores

Treasurer: Anna Sheil Hilado

Campus Representative: Emil Mamalo

Board Members: Sam Delos Reyes Kevin Gajo

Bryan Dela Cruz Jonjie Imperio

Ralph Salmon Mark Arellano

Darlyn Vana Delfin Terre II

(The Nucleus, 2010)

THE ROLE OF THE YOUTH IN NATION BUILDING

The role played by the youth in nation-building has caught the governments’

attention. Their dynamism and activism opened the eyes and minds of the Filipino leaders

and functionaries for needed reform. The Filipino youth throughout the country fearlessly

challenged the corrupt practices of their elders and the deaf ears of society and initiated

moves to start reform. Many young Filipinos served their countrymen in the remote

hinterlands, giving education and services as imperative to political reform.

In return the state is bound to promote and protect the youth’s section well-being

as stated in Article II section 13.

10
 “The State recognizes the vital role of the youth in nation building and shall

promote and protect their physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual, and social well-being. It

shall inculcate in the youth patriotism and nationalism, and encourage their involvement

in public and civic affairs.”

In their training and education the youth are taught virtues of patriotism and

nationalism. They are required to study Philippine Literature, Government, History,

civics and the present constitution. They are encouraged to participate in both public and

civic affairs (Bederio et.al., 2004).

ROLE OF SCHOOL

The role of the educational system, whose curriculum is often heavily

impregnated with the politics, is even more important in promoting a doctored political

culture as the political participation develops inside the club and organization of the

society in the future. The school has an important part where a child starts to open up in

the real society, which is indoctrinated by political affairs, Walherg et.al. (1997).

According to Guillermo (1998), education is a means by which a reader achievers

change for progress, stability, and prosperity. Through its process, the students are

imbued worth proper and upright ideals, values, attitudes and aspirations provided with

good opportunities to get and acquire essential knowledge and understanding habit and

opportunities skills.

Role of a school is to develop raw child to perfect. But present system implication

in poor and developing countries is that perfect (high marks) child is given opportunities

11
to get enrolled to good schools or colleges and if the child is less than the expectations is

asked to seek repetition according to Sadashivan Organization, 2005 (Diaz, 2010).

As part of the study, it is very important to know the history of the school and city

where the research is made in order to determine the society where the organization is

resided.

HISTORY OF SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY

Sultan Kudarat State University formerly known as Sultan Kudarat Polytechnic

State College was established last 1990, by virtue of Republic Act 9673, otherwise

known as the SKPSC Charter and authorized by then Cong. Estanislao Valdez of the

Lone District of Sultan Kudarat in the House of Congress and Senator Edgardo Angara in

the Senate. Unlike other State Colleges, SKPSC was established out of five (5)

previously DECS-supervised High School in five (5) municipalities of the Province.

These High Schools are those in Tacurong, now Tacurong City and site of the

Institute of Arts and Sciences, Isulan, some 12 kilometer west of Tacurong, where the

Institute of Industrial Technology, Computer Science, and Engineering is, Lutayan, some

35 kilometers southwest of Tacurong where the Institute of Agriculture is, Kalamansig,

some 7 hours by land travel to the coast west of Tacurong and where the Institute of

Fishery Technology is, and Palimbang, some 8 hours of land travel to the coast southwest

of Tacurong.

Its main campus and administrative center is in EJC Montilla, 5 kilometer west of

Tacurong, which is also the site of the Laboratory High School, Institute of Teaching

12
Education and Institute of Graduate Studies, Institute of Law and College of Nursing. As

the only State College in the province, resolution were made by the Local Government

Units of Sen. Ninoy Aquino, Bagumbayan and even Glan, Sarangani for the opening of

extension programs in the said municipalities. Consequently, a Memorandum of

Agreement was drafted and signed between and among parties on April 2006, December

16, 2004, and March 10, 2005.

For the last three years during the term of the then President, Nelson T. Binag

preparation were done for the conversion of state college to university and for whatever

reasons the bill was archived. With the installation of the new president, Dr. Teresita

Llorente-Cambel, updating of the document relative to university hood was again done.

In addition, several strategies were employed to meet the most coveted university status

since this was also prime concern of the incumbent president. Hence, on January 18,

2010 by virtue of Republic Act 9966, SKPSC was converted into Sultan Kudarat State

University as sponsored by Hon. Pax Mangudadatu and Hon. Congressman Arnulfo F.

Go in the House of Congress and Senator Manuel Roxas, Senator Edgardo Angara,

Senator Panfilo Lacson and Senator Miguel Subiri in Senate (Sultan Kudarat State

University, 2010).

TACURONG CITY

Tacurong City is a 4th Class City in the Province of Sultan Kudarat, Philippines.

According to the 2010 Census, it has a population of 90,477. Tacurong now has a total

land area of 15,340 hectares, the smallest in land area among the 12 municipalities that

13
compose the new province of Sultan Kudarat, created on November 22, 1973 by

Presidential Decree No. 341. Tacurong became a component city of Sultan Kudarat in

2000 by virtue of Republic Act 8805 in September 2000 (NSCB, 2001).

14
 Chapter III
METHODOLOGY

The study used the descriptive type of research design. In this study, the

researcher gathers information through survey questionnaires drafted with due

consultation and approval from the Adviser, Statistician and English Critic.

Respondents of the Study

The respondents of the study were the one hundred (100) fourth year students who

are officially enrolled at Sultan Kudarat State University, Tacurong City Campus from

School Year 2008-2011. The respondents were selected by their official year of residency

stated above. This implies that they are fourth year student at present. The number of

respondents comes from 1/3 of the total fourth year population of two hundred eighty six

(286).

Data Gathering Procedure

The researcher wrote a request for the Campus Director allowing her to conduct

the study at SKSU-Tacurong City Campus. Requested a copy of the list and number of

fourth year students and took the number of the 1/3 population for each which is 100

respondents filling up the survey questionnaire. 1/3 is used to have a strong and validated

output of the study. The researcher used Random Sampling Technique in the study.

15
Data Gathering Instrument

The researcher together with her Adviser, Statistician and English Critic outlined

a survey questionnaire that has two parts the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects

on the student. Each part has five (5) terms: Student Relations, Dissemination of

Information, Organizing of School Activities, Application of Student Services and

Project Implementation. These terms have five questions each for a total of twenty five

(25) items for Efficiency and another twenty five (25) items for the Effects.

The Descriptive Rating Scale below was used by the respondents in rating each

item as referred to the thesis of Diaz, 2010:

Scale Description
5 Always
4 Oftentimes
3 Sometimes
2 Seldom
1 Never

The Means that were computed from the response of the Efficiency of SBO

Officers was interpreted based on the objectives of the researcher and the scale below:

Scale Interpretation
4.21-5.00 Very Efficient
3.41-4.20 Highly Efficient
2.61-3.40 Moderately Efficient
1.81-2.60 Slightly Efficient
1.00-1.80 Not Efficient

16
 The Means that were computed from the response on the Effects of the Efficiency

of SBO Officers was interpreted based on the objectives of the researcher and the scale

below:

Scale Interpretation
4.21-5.00 Very Effective
3.41-4.20 Highly Effective
2.61-3.40 Moderately Effective
1.81-2.60 Slightly Effective
1.00-1.80 Not Effective

To interpret the degree of relationship between the Efficiency of SBO Officers

and its Effects on the Students, the researcher used the following rating scale below,

when the range of correlation coefficient is near ± 1 there is a strong relationship between

the variables while if the range is near ± 0 there is a weak or no relationship between the

two variables, as referred from Bluman, 1998 (Elementary Statistics):

Scale Interpretation
± 0.91- ± 1.00 very high correlation, very dependent relationship
± 0.71- ± 0.90 high correlation, marked relationship
± 0.41- ± 0.70 moderate correlation, substantial relationship
± 0.21- ± 0.40 slight correlation, definite but small relationship
± 0.00- ± 0.20 low correlation, almost negligible relationship

17
Statistical Treatment

The responses on the level of Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on

students were analyzed and interpreted using the mean.

Legend:
M- Mean rating
Formula: OT- Original Tally
RT- Rating Scale
M= OTxRT N- no. of Respondents
N SM- Section Mean
GM- Grand Mean

SM= sum of mean GM= sum of SM

no. of items no. of items

The Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r) was used to solve for the significant

relationship of the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on students.

Formula: Legend:
r- Correlation Coefficient
N- no. of Respondents
r= N (∑xy) - (∑x) (∑y) ∑xy- sum of xy
√ [N (∑x²) - (∑x)²] [N (∑y²) - (∑y)²] ∑x- sum of x (efficiency)
∑y- sum of y (effects)
∑x²- sum of x²
∑y²- sum of y²

18
 Chapter IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS and INTERPRETATION of DATA

The respondents of the study were one hundred (100) fourth year students of

Sultan Kudarat State University Tacurong City Campus that are officially enrolled and

studied at the University from Academic Year 2008-2011.

Efficiency of SBO Officers

The Efficiency of SBO Officers is determined by the respondents by rating them

in Student Relations, Dissemination of Information, Organizing of School Activities,

Application of Student Services and Project Implementation.

The responses were tallied, computed and presented in the following tables.

19
Table 1.1 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Student
Relations
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers give time to listen and act upon the
complaints of the students. 3.54 Highly Efficient
b. Officers courteously entertain the students. 3.60 Highly Efficient
c. Officers provide seminars, trainings, workshops to 2.99 Moderately
the students. Efficient
d. Officers inform the students about their basic 3.37 Moderately
profile. Efficient
e. Officers and students coordinate on every program. 3.61 Highly Efficient
Section Mean 3.42 Highly Efficient

In terms of Student Relations, the respondents rated the statement e as “Highly

Efficient” with the highest mean rating of 3.61 which implies that oftentimes, the officers

and students coordinate on every program. While statements c has “Moderately Efficient”

interpretation with the lowest mean rating of 2.99 which means that sometimes, officers

provide seminars, trainings, workshops to the students, this is due to the time-consuming

process of acquiring funds and the financial status of the students to provide their

registration fees. A section mean of 3.42 is given by the respondents that is interpreted as

“Highly Efficient” which implies that majority of the statements above are oftentimes

done by the officers with efficiency. This is possible through the cultivation of the

connection between the organization and the students that is the key to the development

of the institution (Emphasis on Social Efficiency- Azanza, 2001).

20
Table 1.2 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Dissemination of
Information
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers conduct student consultation and meetings
before sponsoring programs in the campus. 3.57 Highly Efficient
b. Officers post announcements for every event in the
campus. 4.22 Highly Efficient
c. Officers coordinate with clubs and department
officers on every program in the campus. 3.79 Highly Efficient
d. Officers are updated on every event inside the
university. 3.78 Highly Efficient
e. Officers check attendance every meeting. 4.16 Highly Efficient
Section Mean 3.90 Highly Efficient

The Dissemination of Information conducted by the SBO Officers was rated with

a mean raging from 4.22 as the highest and 3.57 as the lowest that have a section mean of

3.90 interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which indicates that they oftentimes perform the

above statements for dissemination of information. This is due to the officer’s access on

basic materials for the task, such as office computer and communications from different

concerned offices. Thus, connoting good teamwork among the group fosters work

efficiency (Worker’s Efficiency- Ramirez and Beltran, 2004).

21
Table 1.3 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Organizing
School Activities
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers follow the exact annual activity plan of the
campus. 3.89 Highly Efficient
b. Officers hold programs with complete materials. 3.37 Moderately
Efficient
c. Officers start every program on time. 2.96 Moderately
Efficient
d. SBO programs are participated and attended by the
students. 3.50 Highly Efficient
e. SBO programs are beneficial to the students. 3.60 Highly Efficient
Section Mean 3.46 Highly Efficient

When Organizing School Activities the officers were rated with “Highly

Efficient” in statement a with the highest mean of 3.89 which indicates that oftentimes

they follow the exact annual activity plan of the campus, while statement c got the lowest

rating of 2.96, interpreted as “Moderately Efficient” which means that sometimes they

start every program on time, this is because of the limited time allotted by the officers in

preparation for the program and the late arrival of the students and guest speakers. A

section mean of 3.46 is given by the respondents and interpreted as “Highly Efficient,”

which reveals that the SBO Officers oftentimes Organize School Activities. This is

because the Youth; both officers and students are encouraged to participate in public and

civic affairs (The Role of the Youth in Nation Building- Bederio et. al., 2004).

22
Table 1.4 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Application of
Student Services
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers provide basic necessities of students
during or before examinations. (statement of
accounts, receipts, and clearance sheets) 3.88 Highly Efficient
b. Officers facilitate symposiums or other seminars
for the benefit of the students. 3.54 Highly Efficient
c. Officers give unbiased judgment on financial 3.40 Moderately
issues. (gathering of fines) Efficient
d. Officers conduct an orderly signing of clearance. 3.64 Highly Efficient
e. Officers satisfy the students after every sponsored 3.40 Moderately
program. Efficient
Section Mean 3.57 Highly Efficient

As for the Student Services, the respondents rated the officers with the highest

mean of 3.88 that was interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which indicates that oftentimes,

they provide basic necessities of students during or before examinations (statement of

accounts, receipts, and clearance sheets). While statement e got the lowest mean of 3.40

that was interpreted as “Moderately Efficient” which implies that sometimes, they satisfy

the students after every program this is because each student has a different way to be

satisfied. A section mean of 3.57 is given by the respondent that is interpreted as “Highly

Efficient” which indicates that oftentimes, the officers provide student services. This is

because the youth serves their countrymen for the nation’s development (The Role of the

Youth in Nation Building- Bederio et. al., 2004).

23
Table 1.5 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Project
Implementation
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers provide programs that cater the needs of
the students. 3.42 Highly Efficient
b. Officers consult the students before 3.27 Moderately
planning/proposing a project. Efficient
c. Officers implement the projects according to the 3.32 Moderately
exact annual activity plan of the office. Efficient
d. Officers’ projects are useful and beneficial to the 3.31 Moderately
students. Efficient
e. Officers receive opinions/comments from the 3.33 Moderately
students through the suggestion box. Efficient
Section Mean 3.33 Moderately
Efficient

The SBO Officers Efficiency in terms of Projects Implemented was rated with the

highest mean of 3.42 that is interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which indicates that

oftentimes they provide programs that cater the needs of students. Statement e on the

other hand was rated 3.27 as the lowest and interpreted as “Moderately Efficient” which

states that sometimes they consult the students before planning/proposing a project. This

is due to the time-consuming process of consultation, long deliberation of plans and

different views of students. A section mean of 3.33 was given and interpreted as

“Moderately Efficient” which indicates that sometimes, the officers Implement Projects

using the statements above. This is because of the grouping that emphasizes the need for

personnel with the skills in human relations to apply the above statements with efficiency

(Trends on Organization Development- Leveriza, 1990).

24
Table 1.6 Summary Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers
Statements Mean Interpretation
Student Relations 3.42 Highly Efficient
Dissemination of Information 3.90 Highly Efficient
Organizing School Activities 3.46 Highly Efficient
Application of Student Services 3.57 Highly Efficient
Project Implementation 3.33 Moderately Efficient
Grand Mean 3.54 Highly Efficient

To summarize the mean for the efficiency of the SBO Officers, the highest rating

goes to Dissemination of Information which is 3.90 interpreted as “Highly Efficient”

which implies that oftentimes, the officers disseminate information. However, the Project

Implementation garnered the lowest mean of 3.33 that is interpreted as “Moderately

Efficient” which implies that sometimes, they implement projects; this is due to the time-

consuming process of consulting the student population; asking for their approval and

facilitating the approved projects. A grand mean of 3.54 was given by the respondents

and interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which indicates that oftentimes they do the tasks

mentioned above with efficiency. This is because the groups that succeed in their projects

have been found to depend much on their ability to deal with people, and this has been

the key to develop their outputs (Emphasis on Social Efficiency- Azanza, 2001).

Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on Students

The Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers were assessed by the respondents in

terms of Student Relations, Dissemination of Information, Organizing School Activities,

Application of Student Services and Project Implementation.

25
 The responses were tallied, computed and presented in the following tables.

Table 2.1 Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on the
Students in terms of Student Relations
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers adapt and apply the suggestion of the
students from their complaints. 3.54 Highly Effective
b. Officers are treated with the same courtesy they
give to the students. 3.44 Highly Effective
c. Officers and students are well-informed and
knowledgeable. 3.41 Highly Effective
d. Officers are well-known by the students. 3.44 Highly Effective
e. Officers and students conduct an organized and 3.34 Moderately
efficient program. Effective
Section Mean 3.43 Highly Effective

The Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Student Relations had

the highest mean of 3.54 that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which indicates that

oftentimes, the officers are effective in adapting and applying the suggestions of the

students from their complaints, while statement e had the lowest mean of 3.34 and

interpreted as “Moderately Effective” which indicates that sometimes the officers are

effective in conducting an organized and efficient program. This is because the ratio of

students and officers are unbalance that the students are too hard to manage. A section

mean of 3.43 was given by the respondent that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which

implies that oftentimes the officer has an effective student relations. The effectiveness of

the individual in general has been based on having the competence in human relations

just as in scientific and technological ability (Emphasis on Social Efficiency- Azanza,

2001).

26
Table 2.2 Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on the
Students in terms of Dissemination of Information
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers conduct programs in the campus with the
application of student’s suggestions during
consultation. 3.49 Highly Effective
b. Officers and students have a complete attendance Moderately
during the events in the campus. 3.32 Effective
c. Officers harmonize with the club, department
officers on every program. 3.49 Highly Effective
d. Officers are actively participating on every event
inside the university. 3.67 Highly Effective
e. Officers document every attendance of students
during meetings. 3.65 Highly Effective
Section Mean 3.52 Highly Effective

According to the respondents, the Effects of the SBO Officer’s Efficiency in

terms of Dissemination of Information had the highest mean of 3.67 that is interpreted as

“Highly Effective” this implies that oftentimes they are actively participating on every

event inside the university. On the other hand, the lowest mean of 3.32 was given to

statement b that is interpreted as “Moderately Effective” which implies that sometimes,

officers and students have a complete attendance during the events in the campus. This is

because sometimes, the students and officers are requested to report on their OJT or

make-up classes with permission and approval of the authorized personnel. A section

mean of 3.52 was given by the respondent that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which

implies that oftentimes the officers are effective in Disseminating Information. This is

possible with the coordination among the co-officers that creates effectiveness in working

(Worker’s Efficiency- Ramirez and Beltran, 2004).

27
Table 2.3 Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on the
Students in terms of Organizing School Activities
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers conduct activity on time according to the
annual activity plan of the campus. 3.60 Highly Effective
b. Officers satisfy the student on every program 3.34 Moderately
Effective
c. Officers finish every program on time. 3.14 Moderately
Effective
d. SBO programs are conducted with complete 3.40 Moderately
participation of the students. Effective
e. SBO programs increase the level of awareness of
the students 3.48 Highly Effective
Section Mean 3.39 Moderately
Effective

In terms of Organizing School Activities, the respondents rated the SBO Officers

with a highest mean of 3.60 that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which implies that

oftentimes they conduct activity on time according to the annual activity plan of the

campus. While a lowest mean of 3.14 was given to statement c that is interpreted as

“Moderately Effective” which indicates that sometimes they finish every program on

time this is because of the result on table 1.3 statement c that sometimes they also start

the program on time. A section mean of 3.39 was given by the respondent that is

interpreted as “Moderately Effective” which implies that sometimes they are effective in

Organizing School Activities. Effective organization requires the adaption of executive

system. The need to develop the executive branch by appropriate training is essential

(Trends on Organization Development- Leveriza, 1990).

28
Table 2.4 Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on the
Students in terms of Application of Student Services
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. Officers satisfy the student by providing them basic
necessities during or before examinations
(statement of accounts, receipts and clearance
sheets) 3.65 Highly Effective
b. Officers and students are well-coordinated due to
symposium or other seminars facilitated by the
organization. 3.60 Highly Effective
c. Officers are trusted by the students to give unbiased
judgment on gathering of fines. 3.44 Highly Effective
d. Officers provide a comfortable/accessible area 3.30 Moderately
during signing of clearance. Effective
e. Officers are fully-supported by the students every 3.37 Moderately
sponsored program. Effective
Section Mean 3.47 Highly Effective

The Effects of SBO Officer’s Efficiency in terms of Student Services was rated

with the highest mean of 3.65 that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which indicates

that oftentimes, they satisfy the student by providing them basic necessities during or

before examinations (statement of accounts, receipts and clearance sheets). While the

lowest mean of 3.30 that is interpreted as “Moderately Effective” was rated to statement

d which implies that sometimes officers provide comfortable/accessible area during

signing of clearance this is due to the area of the SBO Office that is small and limited to

small number of students at a time. A section mean of 3.47 was given by the respondent

that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which implies that oftentimes, officers are

effective in Student Services. This is due to the Officers’ dynamism and activeness (The

Role of Youth in Nation Building- Bederio et. al., 2004).

29
Table 2.5 Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on the
Students in terms of Project Implementation
Statements Mean Interpretation
a. SBO projects are well-utilized by the students. 3.42 Highly Effective
b. Officers receive suggestions and apply it on their 3.33 Moderately
projects. Effective
c. Officers implement projects for the students on 3.16 Moderately
time. Effective
d. Officers satisfy the needs of students in terms of 3.24 Moderately
projects implemented. Effective
e. Officers address opinions/comments received from 3.36 Moderately
students through the suggestion box. Effective
Section Mean 3.30 Moderately
Effective

According to the respondents, the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officer’s in

terms of Project Implementation had the highest mean of 3.42 that is interpreted as

“Highly Effective” which indicates that oftentimes, SBO projects are well-utilized by the

students. However, the lowest mean of 3.16 was rated to statement c that is interpreted as

“Moderately Effective” and indicates that sometimes officers implement projects for the

students on time; this is due to the long-time processing in the office concerned for the

implementation of projects. A section mean of 3.30 was given by the respondent that is

interpreted as “Moderately Effective” which implies that sometimes the officers are

effective in Project Implementation. This is due to the inappropriate personnel assigned

to the key positions (Trends on Organization Development- Leveriza, 1990).

30
Table 2.6 Summary Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on
the Students
Statements Mean Interpretation
Student Relations 3.43 Highly Effective
Dissemination of Information 3.52 Highly Effective
Organizing School Activities 3.39 Moderately
Effective
Application of Student Services 3.47 Highly Effective
Project Implementation 3.30 Moderately
Effective
Grand Mean 3.42 Highly Effective

Finally to summarize the Effects of the SBO Officer’s Efficiency, the respondents

rated them with the highest mean of 3.52, interpreted as “Highly Effective” in

Dissemination of Information which implies that the officers are effective in the said

statement. However, Project Implementation got the lowest mean of 3.30 that is

interpreted as “Moderately Effective” which indicates that sometimes officers are

effective in Project Implementation. A grand mean of 3.42 is given to this table that is

interpreted as “Highly Effective” in doing the above statements. This is because the

Student Body Organization provides training for leadership through its various social and

educational and cultural programs and activities (Student Organization- SKPSC Student

Handbook, Revised 2004).

31
Relationship between the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on the Students

The Relationship between the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on the

Students were computed using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r).

Table 3 Correlation between the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on the
Students
Variables r Degree of relationship tcomp. Interpretation
Efficiency of SBO High Correlation, Significant
Officers and its Effects on 0.74 Marked Relationship 10.891 Relationship
the Students
r crit.=0.197
t crit. (0.5, 2 tailed) =1.985

The table reveals that the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects has a “High

Degree of Correlation,” with an r-value of 0.74 that is higher than the r-critical of 0.197

and the r-value is near to ± 1, this indicates that there is a strong relationship between the

pair. With t-computed of 10.891 which is higher than the t-critical of 1.985, the

correlation between the variables is interpreted having “Significant Relationship.” This is

because there is a direct cause and effect relationship between the variables if the t-

computed is higher than the t-critical. That is; the Efficiency of the SBO Officers causes

Effectiveness in their basic tasks. The interpretation stated above is supported by Bluman

in his book entitled Elementary Statistics, Third Edition, 1998.

32
 Chapter V
SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSION and RECOMMENDATION

The study of the researcher aimed to determine the Efficiency of the Student Body

Organization Officers, its Effects on the Students at Sultan Kudarat State University

Tacurong City Campus and its significant relationship. This is because of the researcher

seeks for the improvement of Student Leadership in the above mentioned institution.

After gathering, presenting, analyzing and interpreting data, the researcher finally made

her summary, findings, conclusion and recommendation.

SUMMARY

1. The Efficiency of Student Body Organization Officers is determined by the

respondents with a grand mean of 3.54 which is interpreted as Highly

Efficient. All the terms are interpreted the same except for the Project

Implementation that is Moderately Efficient.

2. The Effects of the Efficiency of Student Body Organization on the Students is

determined with a grand mean of 3.42 as Highly Effective. Organizing of

School Activities and Project Implementation however is interpreted with

Moderately Effective.

3. The relationship of the Efficiency of Student Body Organization Officers and

its Effects on the Students is determined as Highly Correlated with an r-

value of 0.74 and interpreted having Significant Relationship.

33
FINDINGS

1. The researcher’s findings on the Efficiency of Student Body Organization

Officers are that their efficiency is already well-performed. Only the Project

Implementation is interpreted as Moderately Efficient, the Officers then have

been doing their duties and responsibilities with efficiency.

2. As to the Effects of the Efficiency, the respondents determined it with an

interpretation of Highly Effective except for the Organizing of School Activities

and Project Implementation. This implies that the efficiency of the Officers in the

above mentioned terms result in a lower interpretation.

3. Lastly, the finding of the researcher in the relationship between the Efficiency of

Student Body Organization Officers and its Effects on the Students is

“Significant.” The pair is Highly Correlated with each other.

34
CONCLUSION

1. The researcher concludes that there is already an existing Efficiency among the

Student Body Organization Officers at Sultan Kudarat State University, Tacurong

City Campus. The Officers are functioning with high efficiency except for the

Project Implementation which needs improvement due to its rating of 3.33 which

is interpreted as Moderately Efficient.

2. The result of the Effects of the Efficiency of Student Body Organization Officer

on the Students concludes that the Officers are Highly Effective in Student

Relations, Dissemination of Information and Application of Student Services.

However, in Organizing School Activities and Project Implementation they are

rated with 3.39 and 3.30 respectively and both interpreted as Moderately

Effective. The latter two needs to be improved to further develop good leadership

towards the students.

3. The significant relationship between the Efficiency of Student Body Organization

Officers and its Effects on the Students determine that there is a High Degree of

Correlation which means that the variables are necessary for the development of

both Student Body Organization Officers and the Students.

35
RECOMMENDATION

The result of this study has come to its end and the researcher finally summarizes

the data, made her findings and conclusion. The researcher now recommends the

following based on her conclusions:

1. To the Future Student Body Organization Officers, the researcher recommends

that they prioritize the Project Implementation through the following plan of

action:

 Conduct a meeting with all the SBO Officers and plan for the Project/s.

 Make a Project Procurement Management Plan (PPMP) based on the projects

approved during the meeting. Appendix no. 8 is an example of PPMP.

 Make a Work and Financial Plan (WFP) based on the approved projects

during the meeting. Appendix no. 9 is an example of WFP.

 Conduct another meeting to approve the PPMP and WFP. If there is a problem

during the making of these documents, don’t hesitate to consult the following

campus offices for improvements: Cashiers Office, Supply and Campus

Director’s Office.

 To avoid delay, be sure to follow the indicated time duration on the

documents.

36
2. As to the Effects of the Efficiency, Organizing School Activities and Project

Implementation have a moderately effective interpretation. Therefore, the

researcher recommends that the future Student Body Organization Officers should

prioritize on the above mentioned tasks by applying the plan of action stated on

the first recommendation.

3. Finally, the researcher recommends that the Student Body Organization Officers

should take the time and effort to evaluate their Efficiency and Effects on

Students in order to record their performance, and be the basis for improvement of

the Future Student Body Organization Officers. This maybe done by asking the

help of the Campus Administration in designing a Standard Evaluation Tool

specially for the SBO Officers. It must be first presented to the concerned offices

for corrections/approval. This tool will be used to determine whether the officers

have done their tasks with efficiency and effectiveness.

37
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. BOOKS

AZANZA, PATRICK ALAIN (2001), Human Behavior and Society, an Introduction

to Social Sciences, printed by Cacho Hermanes, Inc. Pines cor. Union Sts,
Mandaluyong City.

BEDERIO, CONCEPCION L., DELA ROSA, SIMEON J. JR., FUNTECHA,

HENRY F., GICAIN, MA. SOCORRO C., MENDOZA, MARTINA M.,
(2004), Philippine Government and Constitution, printed by Trinitas
Publishing, Inc., Trinitas Complex, Pantoc Road, Pantoc, Meycauayan 3020,
Bulacan.

LEVERIZA, JOSE P. (1990), PUBLIC ADMINISTRATING, the Business of

Government, printed by Echanis Press Inc. 760 Boni Avenue, Mandaluyong,
Metro Manila.

RAMIREZ, LUZVIMINDA F. AND EDEN TONGSON-BELTRAN (2004), Man,

Values Work Ethics, printed by Trinitas Publishing, Inc., Trinitas Complex,
Pantoc Road, Pantoc, Meycauayan 3020, Bulacan.

SKPSC (2004), SKPSC Student Handbook (Revised 2004), E.J.C Montilla, Tacurong
City.

SKSU (2009), SKSU Student Handbook (Revised 2009), ACCESS E.J.C. Montilla,
Tacurong City

B. MAGAZINES

THE NUCLEUS, Vol. VII no. 1 June-October (2008), SBO OFFICERS 2008, SKSU
Tacurong City Campus Tacurong City

THE NUCLEUS, Vol. VII no. 1 June-October (2009), SBO OFFICERS 2009, SKSU
Tacurong City Campus Tacurong City

THE NUCLEUS, Vol. VIII no. 1 June-October (2010), SBO OFFICERS 2010, SKSU
Tacurong City Campus Tacurong City

38
C. THESIS

DIAZ, DEANA (2010), Performances of KAMAGFIL Officers and Its Effects on

Students of Sultan Kudarat State University, Tacurong City Campus, SKSU
Tacurong City Campus, Tacurong City.

D. INTERNET

NSCB, 2001, “Factsheet- 12 New Cities Created.” Retrieved July 30, 2011 from
http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacurong_City

SKSU, 2010, “History of Sultan Kudarat State University.” Retrieved February 12,
2012 from http://www.SKSU.edu

39
APPENDICES

40
Appendix 1 Letter of Permission

Republic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
Tacurong City Campus
January 12, 2012

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D.

Campus Director
SKSU-Tacurong City Campus

Madam:

Greeting of wellness!!!

The undersigned student is currently undertaking a research study entitled

“EFFICIENCY OF THE STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION AND ITS
EFFECTS ON THE STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
TACURONG CITY CAMPUS” as a requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in
Social Sciences major in Political Science.

In connection with this, may I request your good office allowing me to conduct
my research study utilizing the Fourth Year students of SKSU-Tacurong City Campus as
respondents.

Hoping for your support and approval towards my request.

Thank You and More Power!!!

Respectfully,

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE

Researcher
Noted:

REYNALDO H. DALAYAP, Ph.D. REMEDIOS P. DELLERA, Ed.D.

Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dean, College of Hospitality Management
And Business Administration

Approved:

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D.

Campus Director

41
Appendix 2 Survey Questionnaire

EFFICIENCY OF THE STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION AND ITS EFFECTS

ON THE STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
TACURONG CITY CAMPUS
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Direction: Check the box parallel the question. Select your best answer based on the
ratings below:
Scale Description
5 Always
4 Oftentimes
3 Sometimes
2 Seldom
1 Never

NOTE: Only the SBO Officers form S.Y 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 are
subjects of this questionnaire.

A. EFFICIENCY

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers give time to listen and act upon the complaints of the
students.
b. Officers courteously entertain the students.
c. Officers provide seminars, trainings, workshops to the students.
d. Officers inform the students about their basic profile.
e. Officers and students coordinate on every program.

2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers conduct student consultation and meetings before
sponsoring programs in the campus.
b. Officers post announcements for every event in the campus.
c. Officers coordinate with clubs and department officers on
every program in the campus.
d. Officers are updated on every event inside the university.
e. Officers check attendance every meeting.

42
3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers follow the exact annual activity plan of the campus.
b. Officers hold programs with complete materials.
c. Officers start every program on time.
d. SBO programs are participated and attended by the students.
e. SBO programs are beneficial to the students.

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1

a. Officers provide basic necessities of students during or before
examinations. (statement of accounts, receipts, and clearance
sheets)
b. Officers facilitate symposiums or other seminars for the benefit
of the students.
c. Officers give unbiased judgment on financial issues. (gathering
of fines)
d. Officers conduct an orderly signing of clearance.
e. Officers satisfy the students after every sponsored program.

5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers provide that cater the needs of the students.
b. Officers consult the students before planning/proposing a
project.
c. Officers implement the projects according to the exact annual
activity plan of the office.
d. Officers’ projects are useful and beneficial to the students.
e. Officers receive opinions/comments from the students through
the suggestion box.

B. EFFECTS

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers adapt and apply the suggestion of the students from
their complaints.
b. Officers are treated with the same courtesy they give to the
students.
c. Officers and students are well-informed and knowledgeable.
d. Officers are well-known by the students.
e. Officers and students conduct an organized and efficient
program.

43
2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers conduct programs in the campus with the application
of student’s suggestions during consultation.
b. Officers and students have a complete attendance during the
events in the campus.
c. Officers harmonize with the club, department officers on every
program.
d. Officers are actively participating on every event inside the
university.
e. Officers document every attendance of students during
meetings.

3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1

a. Officers conduct activity on time according to the annual
activity plan of the campus.
b. Officers satisfy the student on every program
c. Officers finish every program on time.
d. SBO programs are conducted with complete participation of
the students.
e. SBO programs increase the level of awareness of the students

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1

a. Officers satisfy the student by providing them basic necessities
during or before examinations (statement of accounts, receipts
and clearance sheets)
b. Officers and students are well-coordinated due to symposium
or other seminars facilitated by the organization.
c. Officers are trusted by the students to give unbiased judgment
on gathering of fines.
d. Officers provide a comfortable/accessible area during signing
of clearance.
e. Officers are fully-supported by the students every sponsored
program.

5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1
a. SBO projects are well-utilized by the students.
b. Officers receive suggestions and apply it on their projects.
c. Officers implement projects for the students on time.
d. Officers satisfy the needs of students in terms of projects
implemented.
e. Officers address opinions/comments received from students
through the suggestion box.

44
Appendix 3 Actual Filled-up Survey Questionnaire no. 99

EFFICIENCY OF THE STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION AND ITS EFFECTS

ON THE STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
TACURONG CITY CAMPUS
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Direction: Check the box parallel the question. Select your best answer based on the
ratings below:
Scale Description
5 Always
4 Oftentimes
3 Sometimes
2 Seldom
1 Never

NOTE: Only the SBO Officers form S.Y 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 are
subjects of this questionnaire.

A. EFFICIENCY

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers give time to listen and act upon the complaints of the
students.
b. Officers courteously entertain the students.
c. Officers provide seminars, trainings, workshops to the students.
d. Officers inform the students about their basic profile.
e. Officers and students coordinate on every program.

2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers conduct student consultation and meetings before
sponsoring programs in the campus.
b. Officers post announcements for every event in the campus.
c. Officers coordinate with clubs and department officers on
every program in the campus.
d. Officers are updated on every event inside the university.
e. Officers check attendance every meeting.

45
3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers follow the exact annual activity plan of the campus.
b. Officers hold programs with complete materials.
c. Officers start every program on time.
d. SBO programs are participated and attended by the students.
e. SBO programs are beneficial to the students.

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1

a. Officers provide basic necessities of students during or before
examinations. (statement of accounts, receipts, and clearance
sheets)
b. Officers facilitate symposiums or other seminars for the benefit
of the students.
c. Officers give unbiased judgment on financial issues. (gathering
of fines)
d. Officers conduct an orderly signing of clearance.
e. Officers satisfy the students after every sponsored program.

5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers provide that cater the needs of the students.
b. Officers consult the students before planning/proposing a
project.
c. Officers implement the projects according to the exact annual
activity plan of the office.
d. Officers’ projects are useful and beneficial to the students.
e. Officers receive opinions/comments from the students through
the suggestion box.

B. EFFECTS

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers adapt and apply the suggestion of the students from
their complaints.
b. Officers are treated with the same courtesy they give to the
students.
c. Officers and students are well-informed and knowledgeable.
d. Officers are well-known by the students.
e. Officers and students conduct an organized and efficient
program.

46
2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1
a. Officers conduct programs in the campus with the application
of student’s suggestions during consultation.
b. Officers and students have a complete attendance during the
events in the campus.
c. Officers harmonize with the club, department officers on every
program.
d. Officers are actively participating on every event inside the
university.
e. Officers document every attendance of students during
meetings.

3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1

a. Officers conduct activity on time according to the annual
activity plan of the campus.
b. Officers satisfy the student on every program
c. Officers finish every program on time.
d. SBO programs are conducted with complete participation of
the students.
e. SBO programs increase the level of awareness of the students

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1

a. Officers satisfy the student by providing them basic
necessities during or before examinations (statement of
accounts, receipts and clearance sheets)
b. Officers and students are well-coordinated due to symposium
or other seminars facilitated by the organization.
c. Officers are trusted by the students to give unbiased judgment
on gathering of fines.
d. Officers provide a comfortable/accessible area during signing
of clearance.
e. Officers are fully-supported by the students every sponsored
program.

5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1
a. SBO projects are well-utilized by the students.
b. Officers receive suggestions and apply it on their projects.
c. Officers implement projects for the students on time.
d. Officers satisfy the needs of students in terms of projects
implemented.
e. Officers address opinions/comments received from students
through the suggestion box.

47
Appendix 4 Table of the Mean Rating for the Efficiency of SBO Officers

SOLVING FOR THE MEAN RATING OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SBO

OFFICERS

1. STUDENT RELATIONS
Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 4 9 35 32 19 350 3.54
b. 3 8 33 34 19 349 3.60
c. 13 24 29 19 15 299 2.99
d. 8 13 31 27 19 330 3.37
e. 3 11 27 37 20 354 3.61
Mean 3.42

2. DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION
Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 7 11 23 36 23 357 3.57
b. 1 3 19 27 50 422 4.22
c. 3 6 29 32 29 375 3.79
d. 3 8 25 36 28 378 3.78
e. 1 5 19 27 48 416 4.16
Mean 3.90

3. ORGANIZING SCHOOL ACTIVITIES

Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 1 8 21 40 29 385 3.89
b. 3 14 36 37 10 337 3.37
c. 13 20 35 22 10 296 2.96
d. 2 9 43 28 17 346 3.50
e. 3 9 32 33 20 349 3.60
Mean 3.46

4. APPLICATION OF STUDENT SERVICES

Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 2 7 26 30 34 384 3.88
b. 4 17 25 29 25 354 3.54
c. 5 17 33 23 22 340 3.40
d. 5 12 24 32 27 364 3.64
e. 5 14 35 27 18 336 3.40
Mean 3.57

48
 5. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 6 9 34 39 12 342 3.42
b. 9 14 30 33 13 324 3.27
c. 5 20 31 26 18 332 3.32
d. 5 18 31 28 18 336 3.36
e. 10 17 23 30 20 333 3.33
Mean 3.33

49
Appendix 5 Table of the Mean Rating for the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO
Officers on the Students

SOLVING FOR THE MEAN RATING FOR THE EFFECTS OF THE

EFFICIENCY OF SBO OFFICERS

1. STUDENT RELATIONS
Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 4 9 36 31 20 354 3.54
b. 3 13 35 35 14 344 3.44
c. 1 14 42 29 14 341 3.41
d. 3 17 28 37 15 344 3.44
e. 4 15 42 21 18 334 3.34
Mean 3.43

2. DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION
Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 7 9 33 30 21 349 3.49
b. 9 15 28 29 18 329 3.32
c. 3 15 31 32 19 349 3.49
d. 3 8 32 30 25 360 3.67
e. 5 9 30 24 29 354 3.65
Mean 3.52

3. ORGANIZING SCHOOL ACTIVITIES

Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 5 9 33 26 26 356 3.60
b. 8 12 33 3 16 331 3.34
c. 13 15 32 21 17 308 3.14
d. 7 16 26 30 20 337 3.40
e. 4 13 33 27 22 345 3.48
Mean 3.39

4. APPLICATION OF STUDENT SERVICES

Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 2 8 37 29 24 365 3.65
b. 1 9 37 35 18 360 3.60
c. 5 16 26 34 18 341 3.44
d. 8 19 27 22 21 320 3.30
e. 8 16 26 29 20 334 3.37
Mean 3.47

50
 5. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
Rating Scale
Items 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mean
a. 8 13 26 35 18 342 3.42
b. 9 15 30 26 20 333 3.33
c. 7 21 35 23 14 316 3.16
d. 7 19 33 25 16 324 3.24
e. 8 14 31 28 19 336 3.36
Mean 3.30

51
Appendix 6 Table of (Efficiency) x, (Effects) y, xy, x², y²

Efficiency Effects
R x y xy x² y²
1. 3.88 3.72 14.4336 15.05 13.84
2. 2.52 1.8 4.536 6.35 3.24
3. 4.56 1.8 8.208 20.79 3.24
4. 4.16 4.52 18.8032 17.3 20.43
5. 3.92 3.84 15.0528 15.37 14.75
6. 3.68 4.2 15.456 13.54 17.64
7. 4.04 4.08 16.4832 16.32 16.64
8. 3.12 2.88 8.9856 9.73 8.29
9. 3.16 2.88 9.1008 9.99 8.29
10. 4.88 4.88 23.8144 23.81 23.81
11. 4.08 3.4 13.872 16.64 11.56
12. 2.96 2.84 8.4064 8.76 8.07
13. 4.08 3.6 14.688 16.64 12.96
14. 3.36 3.13 10.5168 11.29 9.8
15. 3.91 4.12 16.1092 15.29 16.97
16. 3.32 2.92 9.6944 11.02 8.53
17. 3.44 3.35 11.524 11.83 11.22
18. 3.32 3.36 11.1552 11.02 11.28
19. 4.04 3.54 14.3016 16.32 12.53
20. 3.64 3.76 13.6864 13.25 14.14
21. 2.48 2.28 5.6544 6.15 5.2
22. 2.8 2.32 6.496 7.84 5.38
23. 3.8 4.16 15.808 14.44 17.31
24. 3.8 4.24 16.112 14.44 17.98
25. 4.4 4.16 18.304 19.36 17.31
26. 4 4.12 16.48 16 16.97
27. 4.24 4.64 19.6736 17.97 21.53
28. 3.52 3.64 12.8128 12.39 13.25
29. 4.64 4.36 20.2304 17.97 19
30. 4.56 4.84 22.0704 20.79 23.43
31. 3.64 2.68 9.7552 13.25 7.18
32. 3.44 3.32 11.4208 11.83 11.02
33. 3.66 3.28 12.0048 13.4 10.76
34. 3.68 3.12 11.4816 13.54 9.73
35. 3.2 3.36 10.752 10.24 11.29
36. 3.36 3.48 11.6928 11.29 12.11
37. 3.24 3.28 10.6272 10.5 10.76
38. 3.16 3.48 10.9968 9.99 12.11
39. 3.88 3.84 14.8992 15.05 14.45
40. 2.6 2.28 5.928 6.76 5.19
41. 3.84 2.96 11.3664 14.74 8.76

52
Appendix 6. Continued…

Efficiency Effects
R x y xy x² y²
42. 3.16 3.6 11.376 9.99 12.96
43. 3.17 3.48 11.0316 10.05 12.11
44. 2.38 2.46 5.8548 5.66 6.05
45. 2.84 2.52 7.1568 8.07 6.35
46. 3.68 4.04 14.8672 13.54 16.32
47. 3.36 3.4 11.424 11.29 11.56
48. 3.04 3.04 9.2416 9.24 9.24
49. 3.36 2.16 7.2576 11.29 4.67
50. 2.52 2.64 6.6528 6.35 6.97
51. 3 2.6 7.8 9 6.76
52. 2.25 2.16 4.86 5.06 4.67
53. 3 3.24 9.72 9 10.5
54. 3.12 3.16 9.8592 9.73 9.99
55. 4.64 4.48 20.7872 21.53 20.07
56. 4.84 4.52 21.8768 23.43 21.88
57. 2.92 3.08 8.9936 8.53 9.49
58. 3.64 3.7 13.468 13.25 13.69
59. 3.67 3.44 12.6248 13.47 11.83
60. 3.84 3.52 13.5168 13.21 12.39
61. 4.6 4.44 20.424 21.16 19.71
62. 2.92 2.36 6.8912 8.53 5.57
63. 1.44 1.6 2.304 2.07 2.56
64. 4.16 4.68 19.4688 17.31 21.9
65. 4.24 4.24 17.9776 17.98 17.98
66. 3.48 3.64 12.6672 12.11 13.25
67. 2.8 2.24 6.272 7.84 17.98
68. 4.52 4.32 19.5264 20.43 18.66
69. 4.58 3.92 17.9536 20.98 15.37
70. 2.67 2.5 6.675 7.13 6.25
71. 3.79 2.2 8.338 14.36 4.84
72. 3.96 4.04 15.9984 15.68 16.32
73. 3.8 4.24 16.112 14.44 17.98
74. 3.6 2.87 10.332 12.96 8.24
75. 2.96 3.36 9.9456 8.76 11.29
76. 1.71 3.65 6.2415 2.92 13.32
77. 3.6 3.8 13.68 12.96 14.44
78. 1.64 1.44 2.3616 2.69 2.07
79. 3.2 3.4 10.88 10.24 11.56
80. 4.36 3.08 13.4288 19 9.49
81. 2.76 2.08 5.7408 7.62 4.33
82. 4.68 4.72 22.0896 21.9 22.28

53
Appendix 6. Continued…

Efficiency Effects
R x y xy x² y²
83. 2.38 3.88 9.2344 5.66 15.05
84. 4.52 4.36 19.7072 20.43 19
85. 1.71 1.92 3.2832 2.92 3.69
86. 4 4.04 16.16 16 16.32
87. 3.72 3.46 12.8712 13.84 11.97
88. 4.8 4 19.2 23.04 16
89. 4.04 4.08 16.4832 16.32 16.64
90. 2.76 2.92 8.0592 7.62 8.53
91. 3.04 2.72 8.2688 9.24 7.4
92. 4.84 5 24.2 23.43 25
93. 4.84 4.92 23.8128 23.43 24.21
94. 4.84 4.92 23.8128 23.43 24.21
95. 4.12 3.88 15.9856 16.97 15.05
96. 2.68 2.52 6.7536 7.18 6.35
97. 3.92 4.28 16.7776 15.37 18.32
98. 3.92 3.36 13.1712 15.37 11.29
99. 2.54 2.48 6.2992 6.45 6.15
100. 3.28 2.6 8.528 10.75 6.76
Total 353.86 341.86 1259.6789 1306.46 1252.78

54
Appendix 7 Solving for the Relationship between the Efficiency of SBO
Officers and its Effects on the Students using the Pearson Product
Moment Correlation

r= N (∑xy) – (∑x) (∑y)

√ [N (∑x²) – (∑x)²] [N (∑y²) – (∑y)²]

r= 100(1259.6789) – (353.86) (341.86)

√ [100 (1306.46) – (353.86)²] [100 (1252.78) – (341.86)²]

r= 125,967.89 – 120,970.57
√ (130,646 – 125,216.89) (125,278– 116,868.25)

r= 4997.32
√ (5429.11) (8409.75)

r= 4997.32
√ 45,657,457

r= 4997.32
6757.0301

r= 0.7395734

r= 0.74

55
Appendix 8 Example of Projected Procurement Management Plan
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
Tacurong City Campus, Tacurong City
PROJECTED PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
OFFICE OF THE STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION
Estimated Source of Remarks
No. Item Description Quantity Cost Funds
1 School Activities and Programs 59,000.00 SBO Fund
2 Seminars Trainings and Workshop 87,000.00 SBO Fund
3 Meals and Snacks 13,000.00 SBO Fund
4 Petty Cash 5,000.00 SBO Fund
5 Uniform and ID 20 persons 6,600.00 SBO Fund
6 Projects 45,000.00 SBO Fund
7 Financial Assistance 10,000.00 SBO Fund
8 Scissors 3 pcs. SBO Fund
9 8.5x13 book paper 2 rims SBO Fund
10 8.5x11 book paper 2 rims SBO Fund
11 No. 2 Mongol Pencil 5 pcs. SBO Fund
12 Eraser Big (white) 5 pcs. SBO Fund
13 Stapler (big) 2 pcs. SBO Fund
14 Staple wire 2 boxes SBO Fund
15 Expandable Folder (long) 1 dozen SBO Fund
16 Pilot fine pen (black) 1 dozen SBO Fund
17 Highlighting pen 2 SBO Fund
18 Expandable Envelop (long) 1 dozen SBO Fund
19 Masking tape 1” big 5 pcs. SBO Fund
20 Yellow pad paper 5 pads SBO Fund
21 Record Notebook 90’s 2 pcs. SBO Fund
22 Dust pan 2 pcs. SBO Fund
23 Soft Broom 2 pcs. SBO Fund
24 HP deskjet Ink Advantage 2010 Ink 2 refills SBO Fund
Refill
Purpose: To be used for the office transactions of the Student Body Organization S.Y. 2011-2012.

Requested by: Noted:

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE EDGAR MARAVILLOSA
SBO Governor SBO Adviser
Recommending Approval:

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D. REX F. DAPITAN, MPA

Campus Director VP for Finance
Approved:

TERESITA L. CAMBEL, Ed.D.

SKSU President

56
Appendix 9 Example of Work and Financial Plan
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
Tacurong City Campus, Tacurong City
WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN
CALENDAR YEAR 2011-2012
Office of the Student Body Organization

Banner Time In- Proposed Source of Remar

Programs/Project Activities/Strategies Table/Duratio charge/Persons Budget Funds ks
n Involved
School Activities SBO Officers shall
and Programs prepare necessary
materials for the
program such as
Decorations, Sound
System, Venue Rentals
and Honorarium for
Guest Speakers.
a. Acquaintance Party July 2011 SBO Officers 10,000.00 SBO Fund
b. Nutrition Month 3,000.00
SBO Officers
Celebration July 2011 SBO Fund
c. Buwan ng Wika August 2011 SBO Officers 3,000.00 SBO Fund
d. Intramural Meet August 2011 SBO Officers 10,000.00 SBO Fund
10,000.00
SBO Officers
e. Intercampus Meet December 2011 SBO Fund
10,000.00
SBO Officers
f. Christmas Party December 2011 SBO Fund
3,000.00
SBO Officers
g. Kambuniyan Festival January12 SBO Fund
10,000.00
SBO Officers
h. Valentines Escapade February 2012 SBO Fund
SBO Officers shall be sent to
Seminars/Trainings/ Workshops to further
develop their skills and knowledge. (Note:
Seminars Travels should provide
Trainings and invitations/communications and is related to
Workshop their obligations as SBO Officers) SBO Officers SBO Fund

a. USG Leadership Training June 2011 SBO Officers 12,000.00 SBO Fund

b. VMRYLE (Visayas and Mindanao Rizal October-

Youth Leadership Seminar) November 2011 SBO Officers 25,000.00 SBO Fund

c. RYLE (Rizal Youth Leadership Seminar) December 2011 BO Officers 50,000.00 SBO Fund

57
 Banner Time In- Proposed Source of Remar
Programs/Project Activities/Strategies Table/Duratio charge/Persons Budget Funds ks
n Involved
Meals and Snacks will
be provided to SBO
Officers, Faculty and
Staff during June 2011-
Meals and Snacks programs/meetings. March 2012 SBO Officers 13,000.00 SBO Fund

SBO Office shall be

provided with Php.
500.00/mon. for
emergency fund which
will be allocated for
transportation expenses
of the Officers during
emergency meetings and June 2011-
Petty Cash other official businesses. March 2012 SBO Officers 5,000.00 SBO Fund
Contact agencies that
can provide services for
T-shirt Printing and ID
Uniform and ID lay outing. July 2011 SBO Officers 6,600.00 SBO Fund
Canvass for the
materials of projects on
agencies/companies that
Projects can provide the former. SBO Officers
a. Bar Code Computer Program SBO Officers 5,000.00 SBO Fund
b. Street Light June 2011- SBO Officers 30,000.00 SBO Fund
c. Digital Camera March 2012 SBO Officers 10,000.00 SBO Fund

Prepared by:

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE

SBO Governor
Noted:

EDGAR MARAVILLOSA GENOVEVA E. PAUYA, Ph.D.

SBO Adviser Campus Director

JASMIN C. ABING REX F. DAPITAN, MPA

Director for Student Affairs VP for Finance

Approved:

TERESITA L. CAMBEL, Ed. D.

SKSU President

58
Appendix 10 Form 7
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
City of Tacurong
February 15, 2012

APPLICATION FOR THESIS FINAL DEFENSE EXAMINATION

Name: ANN RIZA E. PIROTE Degree/Major: BASS POLITICAL SCIENCE

Thesis Title: EFFICIENCY OF STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION OFFICERS
AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARAT STATE
UNIVERSITY TACURONG CITY CAMPUS.
Check whether First ( ⁄ ) Second ( ) or Third ( ) Examination
Date of Exam: FEB. 17, 2012 Time: 1:00 PM Place: OFFICE OF THE CAMPUS DIRECTOR

MEMBERS OF THE EXAMINING COMMITTEE

(At least 3 including the adviser)
Name Signature Date

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D. _________________ February 15, 2012

NORMA P. ULANGKAYA____ _________________ February 15, 2012

NOEL O. OCTAVIANO, MA__ _________________ February 15, 2012

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED:

RODELYN M. DALAYAP, Ph. D. GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph. D.

Research Chairman Campus Director

REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION

(Indicate whether passed or failed under remarks)

Signature Date Remarks

_________________________ February 17, 2012 Passed
_________________________ February 17, 2012 Passed
_________________________ February 17, 2012 Passed

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED:

RODELYN M. DALAYAP, Ph. D. GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph. D.

Research Chairman Campus Director

59
Appendix 11 Form 9
Republic of the Philippines
SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
City of Tacurong

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

CERTIFICATION OF ENGLISH CRITIC

This is to certify that the thesis entitled “EFFICIENCY OF STUDENT BODY

ORGANIZATION OFFICERS AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE STUDENTS AT

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY TACURONG CITY CAMPUS” of

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE was edited by the undersigned on March 28, 2012.

CHRISTOPHER B. BLASURCA
Name and Signature of English Critic

NOTED:

EDGAR C. MARAVILLOSA
Department Chairman

NOTE: This certificate should be submitted to the Research Chairman prior to the
approval/reproduction of this manuscript.

60
 BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

Love and attraction brought two different people as one. Harriet and Joselito took

a chance of living together until their eldest daughter was born. Ann Riza Echavarri

Pirote took her first breath September 2, 1989 with the presence of her parents and

grandmother, Lola Anita as Komadrona in a small house at Makati City. Weighing 8lbs.,

it was hard for her mother to deliver such offspring.

Ann grew as a spoiled child until her brother was born. Her parents are so

supportive of their studies that Ann became active in her pre-school days. She graduated

at Saint Micheal Early Learning Center as Pre-school student and studied at South

Cembo Elementary School from grade 1 and 2. She then had a younger sister to add in

the family. Before ending the school year 1998, her father died out of Cardiac Arrest

March 16, 1998. Ann and her family was left with her tito Mao (the younger brother of

Ann’s father). Due to a very hard living at Manila, Ann’s family had to transfer residence

from one place to another so as her school until they have decided to go home to

Mindanao. By the year 1999, Ann went to Montessori Learning Center as a 4th grade

Student, 5th grade at Tacurong Pilot Elementary School and graduated her elementary at

Baras Elementary School in the year 2001 as Class Salutatorian.

High School was very frustrating for Ann as her mother and Tito Mao decided to

get married and had a child. Because of her elementary achievement, Ann enrolled at

Notre Dame of Tacurong for Girls with a scholarship. Unluckily, she started to feel

unhealthy and diagnosed with a Mild Rheumatic Heart Disease which required her to live

in a healthy environment. She then transferred to her mother’s home town Baras and

61
studied at Apolinario S. Bernardo Memorial High School as a second year student and

graduated with honors. Ann applied for MSU-SASE scholarship and passed but her

mother didn’t allow her to study at MSU Marawi to take up BS Psychology because of

her sickness.

Ann enrolled at Sultan Kudarat Polytechnic State College (SKPSC) now Sultan

Kudarat State University Isulan Campus by 2006 as a Civil Engineering student. It was a

very difficult time for her because it wasn’t her field of expertise. By second semester of

2007 she transferred at SKPSC-Tacurong Campus and shifted to a course of Bachelor of

Arts in Social Science major in Political Science.

Studying at SKPSC now SKSU brought so many opportunities to Ann; she

became an Associate Editor-in-Chief of Isulan Campus’ Publication (Technopipeline)

2006-2007, Peer Helper, and Band Vocalist (Red Fox) of the same year and campus. It

continued as she was appointed Editor-in-Chief of Tacurong Campus Publication (The

Nucleus) for two consecutive years, the first to be Chief Editor of Triumph (The Official

Yearbook Publication of SKSU) by 2010, Department Mayor of BASS Political Science,

and now SBO Governor 2011-2012.

As her life passed by, she then realized that studying college at this Institution for

6 years was very fulfilling. Accomplishing such experience made her prepared for

another leap of faith. A child to a young woman, with no regrets and filled with hope for

a successful future.

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE

Researcher
62