RULE 39 – EXECUTION, SATISFACTION AND EFFECT OF JUDGMENTS
MACASASA vs. SICAD, G.R. NO. 146547, JUNE 20, 2006
TIOROSIO-ESPINOSA vs. HOFILEÑA-EUROPA, G.R. NO. 185746, JANUARY 20, 2016
MOTION FOR EXECUTION
BOAC vs. CADAPAN, G.R. Nos. 184461-62, MAY 31, 2011 VARIANCE RULE KKK FOUNDATIONM, Inc. vs. CALDERON-BARGAS, G.R. NO. 163785, DECEMBER 27, 2007 EXECUTION BY MOTION BY INDEPENDENT ACTION UCPB vs. LUMBO, G.R. NO. 162757, DECEMBER 11, 2013 BASILONIA vs. VILLARUZ, G.R. Nos. 191370-71, AUGUST 10, 2015 EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS FOR MONEY VALENZUELA vs. DE AGUILAR, G.R. Nos. L-18083, MAY 31, 1963
EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOCTRINE OF IMMUTABILITY OF JUDGMENT
FGU INSURANCE CORP. vs. RTC, G.R. NO. 161282, FEBRUARY 23, 2011
DEED AND POSSESSION TO BE GIVEN AT EXPIRATION OF REDEMPTION PERIOD;
BY WHOM EXECUTED OR GIVEN CABLING vs. LUMAPAS, G.R. NO. 196950, JUNE 18, 2014
EFFECTS OF JUDGMENTS OR FINAL ORDERS
CITY OF CEBU vs. DEDAMO, JR., G.R. NO. 172852, JANUARY 30, 2013 PNB vs. LIM, G.R. NO. 171677, JANUARY 30, 2013 LBP vs. SPS. ORILLA, G.R. NO. 194168, FEBRUARY 13, 2013
EXECUTION OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD
KOREA TECHNOLOGIES CO., Ltd., vs. LERMA, G.R. NO. 143581, JANUARY 7, 2008