Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

RULE 39 – EXECUTION, SATISFACTION AND EFFECT OF JUDGMENTS

MACASASA vs. SICAD, G.R. NO. 146547, JUNE 20, 2006


TIOROSIO-ESPINOSA vs. HOFILEÑA-EUROPA, G.R. NO. 185746, JANUARY 20, 2016

MOTION FOR EXECUTION


BOAC vs. CADAPAN, G.R. Nos. 184461-62, MAY 31, 2011
VARIANCE RULE
KKK FOUNDATIONM, Inc. vs. CALDERON-BARGAS, G.R. NO. 163785, DECEMBER
27, 2007
EXECUTION BY MOTION BY INDEPENDENT ACTION
UCPB vs. LUMBO, G.R. NO. 162757, DECEMBER 11, 2013
BASILONIA vs. VILLARUZ, G.R. Nos. 191370-71, AUGUST 10, 2015
EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS FOR MONEY
VALENZUELA vs. DE AGUILAR, G.R. Nos. L-18083, MAY 31, 1963

EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOCTRINE OF IMMUTABILITY OF JUDGMENT


FGU INSURANCE CORP. vs. RTC, G.R. NO. 161282, FEBRUARY 23, 2011

DEED AND POSSESSION TO BE GIVEN AT EXPIRATION OF REDEMPTION PERIOD;


BY WHOM EXECUTED OR GIVEN
CABLING vs. LUMAPAS, G.R. NO. 196950, JUNE 18, 2014

EFFECTS OF JUDGMENTS OR FINAL ORDERS


CITY OF CEBU vs. DEDAMO, JR., G.R. NO. 172852, JANUARY 30, 2013
PNB vs. LIM, G.R. NO. 171677, JANUARY 30, 2013
LBP vs. SPS. ORILLA, G.R. NO. 194168, FEBRUARY 13, 2013

EXECUTION OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD


KOREA TECHNOLOGIES CO., Ltd., vs. LERMA, G.R. NO. 143581, JANUARY 7, 2008

Вам также может понравиться