Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Quite consciously and not accidently, not excusably, murdering thoughts is the
purposeful carnality in selfish arrogant and malevolent intention to kill another person.
Alternatively, depending on your particular slant, perhaps one could consider the killing
of another life form. However, in particular reference to this point of preference, thinking
is the primacy of the willful transition from ideation to termination. Herein, criminality is
the emphasis, and may include individuals or heads of state.
Contrary to the regressive tendency of an academic salaciousness to purport
exceptionality, and specification of mitigation, everyone is ultimately responsible for
each category of personal behavior. Thereby, everyone must be held accountable;
whereby responsibility shall reset the imbalance of the murderous behavior. Any
particular focus on the perpetrator, whether state or individual, fabricates and
excludability whereby further devolution of the species is hastened.
Otherwise, unless justice is sure, swift and certain, which it is not generally, the
human species will continue toward its eventual demise. For the prurient inclination
toward murdering, the particular inference is that which the contemplation of exceptional
bodily harm, beyond self-defense, or any conception of justification, carries out the
necessary energies to cause another’s death. Basically, there is gain to be had, risk to be
assessed, and perpetration with decisive resolve to execute another.
Whining, sniveling, malcontented childishness in defense of the killer does not change
the viability of the killer’s consummation of the action. Killing is a selfish notion that
achieves private peculiarity to the individual so that hedonistic gratification can be
obtained. There are no excuses to lessen the intentional nature of the inherent bio-
sexuality of the killer in his or her expressiveness to kill another human.
Malice is well formed in the cerebral processes of the murderer. And, the depths of his
or her rationality stretch beyond another’s easy interpretation. Trouble free simplicity of
explanation is not to be found within the scheme of the “infotainment news” reporting
environment. Neither will you gain a greater grasp of insight by way of alleged non-
practitioner “experts”. Depravity, as might be asserted by the cognitive bias of many,
does possess the lack of rational attribution within the thinking of the killer.
3
Deeply defended postures of belief, regardless of setting, are troubled by the fragility
of the invested faith in the particular point of view. People do not like to think they could
be wrong. Arrogance of one’s subjective validation is a daunting dilemma to overcome
within the selfishness of cognitive bias. Nearly everyone, and that comes to being just
about all of us, wants their perspective of the world to be the correct one. As one
example, we witness such animosities in the religious conflict that spans the globe. In
another, a political ideology commits grievous acts of genocide.
In the course of the 20th century, more killings took place than in any previous
century. Humans seem to have a real penchant for harming their fellow inhabitants of the
planet. Religion is an excellent example of using beliefs to carry out atrocious acts of
debauchery. Likewise, so is any other ideological outlook. In the broad spectrum of the
supernatural, extraterrestrial or other cultic behaviors, fundamental dogmas are difficult
to transform. By the inner malevolence of character, consciousness and consensus, an
individual or group is capable to the most horrific acts are terrorism.
Reputations, rank and statuses, personal outlook and lifestyle, are at stake for most
people at any given moment. Challenged and confronted by conflicting probabilities of
error is frightening, whether one admits it or not. It would seem logical that one would
alter his or her theory, or opinion, given the possibility that newer evidence offers
answers to the contrary. Yet, such likelihoods do not cause significant changes in
standpoints or attitudes. Altering one’s psychological structures is troubling.
Malice aforethought in murdering thoughts might characterize what could be cited as
the “descent of humankind”, as opposed to any 19th century notion for an “ascent”. On
the contrary, given several hundred years of existence, the human species has not
changed very much. On a surface level of ignorant assertion, one may claim a limited
degree of wishful thinking in that hope springs eternal. However, not much changes from
decade to decade, give or take a few statistical variations.
Considering the proclivities for killing, wars, contrived depravations of all kinds,
corruption, ignorance, economic instability and disparity of wealth, disease, illicit
tampering with nature, depletion of natural resources, and so on, human beings devolve
toward their own extinction. Why should that be a surprise? Nonetheless, most would
rather not think about distasteful prospects that might upset their day.
5
Modern day trends suggest, sometimes directly and sometimes indirectly, the debasing
cultural implications for the human species to follow the dinosaur. More than likely,
given the current divisive diversity of inhumanity, the next extinction will be us.
Stupidity, as an aspect of a failure to self-evolve, is at the core of the degradation. Stupid
thinking is motivational in the application of stupid behavior.
Malice is within the purposeful aims of getting what you want regardless of the effects
on others. Forget television fictions of motive, means and opportunity. We all have that
potentiality. Yet, on a personal basis, we are more deceptive than that. Every act becomes
real from neural imaginings, by which one contrives their egoistic objectives from
malevolent thinking, calculated premeditation and intention infliction.
In the pseudosciences, which might be referenced the alleged “social sciences”, an
array of fashionable theories perpetrate the illusion of psychosocial solutions.
Unfortunately, for academicians, politicians and many public service administrators, the
conceited pretentiousness to “answers” is quite bogus. On the contrary, decades, centuries
and eras of time have shown that not much has changed in terms of human nature.
Foolishness in child-like beliefs, as in the occult, the supernatural and assorted
mythologies, dogmatic illusions, etc., permeates the theoretical assertions. From one
school of thought after another, as though a “bacterial infection” of thinking, the smug
piety spreads to public policy. Once the public clings to the “expert” assertion, and the
news media contrives a plethora of buzzwords, the anti-thinking fix is set.
There is no cure for stupid thinking. Once infected it becomes the “zombie effect” and
the simplicity of easy conjecture requires little validation, proof or evidence. Such things
as “criminal profiling”, “cold readings”, fortune telling, guru cultism, ideological
extremism, cause-effect illusions, and so on. The list of fallacies of inference leading to
misguided and debasing hasty generalizations is endless.
After such, malice aforethought remains at the deeper recesses within the essential
darkness of the nature of human ideations. Therein resides the destructive potentiality of
humans on the planet. Our persistent slothfulness in thinking not much more than the
next “all you can eat” buffet line. Fat, bloated, lazy and irresponsible, a species squanders
the extraordinary possibilities of advancing to a higher form of civilization. Yes, while
there are noble exceptions, they are not enough to curtail the looming disaster.
6
Such is the mark of a devolving social structure and a regressive culture. With cultic-
like characteristics, adherents and wannabe followers, find instant quick fix solutions for
the alleged “ailments” in human nature’s psychodynamic complexity. By comparison,
nearly every one of us suffers some range of dysfunctions over a lifetime. Several keys
studies at both national and international levels address the wide variations of thinking
and behavioral aberrations of practically all humans on the planet.
That means the vast majority, if not all, from at least one perspective, fantasize and
fabricate a range of probable negative thinking processes. At any given moment, for any
set of circumstances, each of us is potentially quite wicked. Whatever our level of
unevolved selfishness, we are not going to look too deeply within. When we do this, it is
likely we consider a diverse reach of hateful and horrid thoughts about what we might do
to others. In the gambit of our ruse, we will avoid going in depth by way of intense
reflective introspection. Confronting our potent malevolence is very fearful.
Since scientist and pseudoscientists are fond of using the “animal-human” analogy, it
remains fascinating to look at such conjecture. That is, in lab experiment for instance, a
research team will study a particular group of animals. In the followup to the tentative
results of their inquiry, they might make a comparison between say rats and humans. As
such, there does not seem an occasion when news reports pointed out the anatomical
differences between a rat and a human. Nonetheless, by way of such analogies, how
would one calculate the cunning rational intentional cruelty of a lab rodent?
While animal life forms scavenge for basic survival needs in general, humankind
calculates with malevolent purposes how to get more at a cost to others. By the vanity of
self-centeredness, with rational choice and selectivity, people play games of one-
upmanship with ruthless capabilities. For sport, profit and acquisition, either for mental
or physical reward, or both, someone else will likely lose in the process. Through the
various facets of immaturity, child-like antics foment acts of rudeness, bullying, abusive
condemnations, tortuous mutilations and murderous inflictions.
In addition, malice aforethought does not forget or overlook ideologies of every kind.
No, not by a long shot does the murdering mindset escape the superstitious fixations of
one belief system versus another. To kill or maim for salacious indulgence, in warfare or
commercial consumption, is the intended malice of species in decline.
8
Some might argue that the affinity for doing harm to others is an evolutionary
inheritance handed down through ages. You might inquire, is that really possible? And if
so, then how do you prove an assertion like that? What is the evidence in support of the
factuality? Such notions are on the curvature of a slippery slope that slides into a slant
toward “biological determinism”, or some flirtation with a “DNA precursor” to certain
predispositions. If that’s true, then how much control do you have?
That often leads to a very simplistic notion that one’s physical makeup, their biology,
serves as a kind of “hardwired” set of programming. Similarly, you hear contemporary
comparisons of humans to machines, like computers. That is, we have a CPU, the brain,
and internal software design throughout the body. Additionally, from the biological
perspective, the subsequent connotations conjure the “medical model” of behavior. This
concerns dealing with unsocial human actions from a “disease” perspective.
If you label a certain action as say a mental disorder, then you can concoct a cure, and
that sounds simple. This often suggests medication, or therapy, and will an elixir of some
sort out to cure the alleged affliction. In that case, once someone has contracted
“criminality” it is like catching a cold, or the flu, or perhaps a “diseased mind”. So, as
long as you can keep the questions basic, the theories brief and uncontested, limit proof
to fallacies of inference, or faulty analogy, explanations can be trouble free.
Then again, if the proclivity to hurt others is “genetic”, passed on by eons of time, one
generation to the next, one can ensure that hope springs eternal. Also, you could say it is
somehow related to our “hunter-gather” past, and everything seems to fall into place. As
some have alluded in their illusions to myth, magic and mysticism. Sure, for many,
dreaming does not assure objective validity in proof beyond any doubt. To say that we
are “cursed” by having been “hunter gatherers”, does not explain human thinking
processes in all the diversity and complexity of our varied manifestations.
When it comes to maladaptive and exploitive behaviors, human activities involve a
diversity of opinion and subsequent theory. Beliefs of one sort or another pose many
interesting possibilities. For instance, from one perspective, if you are driven by your
inner nature, due to the forces of ancestry and evolution, natural selection, and perhaps an
“illness” of the “mind”, then you might be more like a robot, an android, and so on. As
such, how are you liable and subsequently accountable for your actions?
9
To be content is to face the advent of one’s transition beyond the primal stages of
juvenile thinking, whereby immaturity underscores debasing selfishness. From “tea time”
to torture, along with missionaries to murder, primordial hedonistic inclinations are
summoned malevolently to satiate private proclivities. Seduction to the darkside of
human nature purposely indulges in the carnality of self-interests.
Yet, by collective debauchery of illicit thinking, communal purposes pervade the
herded consensus with inane pursuits of excuse after excuse, to salivate for every
mitigation in mutual reflection. Of religious icons, silver bullets, wolf’s bane and garlic,
medieval thinking wishes to hold off the “evil” duality of our echo. Regardless of
fabricated illusions and pretended civility, darkness prevails.
Disciplining oneself to acceptance of present moments, in the fortitude of self-reliance
for responsibility within particular circumstances, is the quest and the start toward a wiser
perspective on living. Additionally, growing in the intuitive sense of personal evolution
clasps the mindset of desiring nothing more than necessities. Well-being of sound mind,
personal confidence in maturity of self, and perseverance of individual betterment, voids
the incessant fixation for gluttonous materiality.
Not to forget of course, the essentiality of working diligently, mentally and physically,
to put one’s own “house” in order, and not to obsess about what anyone else has, or is
doing, or might be getting. Such preoccupations are counterproductive and uncreative. In
the process, there is nothing anyone possesses that the self-evolving person wants. He or
she is guided by his or her own intentional choices, and by virtue of intelligent
deliberation. With no complaints, malice toward none, he or she is focused.
However, for the glory seekers, pompous portentousness of pitiful piety, the
regressive desire to be noticed, the concupiscence of needy self-validation, and the
gluttony of gorging the fractured inner self, the devolution of culture and species
continues. And so, for the couple hundred thousand years of human beings on the planet,
human nature has not changed in radically ascendant ways.
In a sense, technology and other more mechanical animations, by the inventiveness of
the few to serve and entertain the many, have been extraordinarily revolutionary. But as
to social interactions across socio-economic levels, cultures, ethnicities, and racial
proximities, the vast majority of populations remain immaturely divisive.
13
http://whimsicalpublications.com/Randy_Gonzalez/Randy_Gonzalez.html
https://www.scribd.com/document/384690439/Chrystal-Chalice-What-Price-for-
Chrysalis-Episode-One-Short-Story-Mature-Content-Erotica
https://www.scribd.com/document/387335265/A-Short-Story-Chrystal-Chalice-Who-
Did-the-Malice-Episode-2