Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
M any rese archers over the period h ave identified different HRM pr actices by different n ames.
Rese archers v ariously refer to cert ain sets of HRM pr actices as “best pr actices” or „high
perform ance‟ (Huselid, 1995) „sophistic ated‟ (Golh ar and Deshp ande, 1997; Hornsby and Kur atko,
1990; Goss et al., 1994; W agner, 1998) or as “profession al” (Gn an and Songini, 2003; M atl ay, 1999).
Pfeffer (1994; 1998) argued the most appropri ate term is „Best HRM pr actices‟. However, according
to Ch andler and McEvoy (2000) one of the lingering questions in HRM rese arch is whether or not
there exists a single set of policies or pr actices th at represents a univers ally superior appro ach to
m an aging people. Theories on best pr actices suggest th at univers ally, cert ain HRM pr actices either
sep ar ately or in combin ation yield improved org anis ation al perform ance.
A number of lists of „best pr actices‟ h ave been produced; Guest (1999) drew up the following list.
1. Selection and the c areful use of selection tests to identify those with potenti al to m ake contribution.
3. Job design to ensure flexibility, commitment and motiv ation, including steps to ensure th at
employees h ave the responsibility and autonomy fully to use their knowledge and skills.
Redm an and M athews (1998) in a study also identified an HRM bundle of key pr actices th at support
services org anis ations;
1. C areful recruitment and selection, for ex ample, „tot al qu ality recruitment‟, „zero defects
recruitment‟, „right first time recruitment‟.
3. Extensive remuner ation systems for ex ample bonuses for st aff willing to be multi-skilled
5. Employee involvement
The 3cTER fr amework of HRM pr actices which w as developed by S axen a and Tiw ari (2009) through
ex amining the HRM pr actices of le ading IT comp anies like T AT A, Infosys and Wipro in Indi a
identified culture building, c areer development, compens ation
21
and benefits, tr aining and development, employer-employee rel ations and recognition through
rew ards as import ant HRM pr actices.
Delery and Doty (1996) identified seven str ategic HR pr actices th at are rel ated to over all
org anis ation al perform ance;
3. Results-oriented appr ais al
4. Perform ance-b ased compens ation
5. Employment security
6. Employee voice
However, the best known which w as produced by Pfeffer (1998 a) n amed the following pr actices.
1. Selective hiring
2. Employment security
3. Self-m an aged te ams
5. Extensive tr aining
7. Sh aring inform ation
In a not able rese arch work c arried out by Appelb aum et al, (2000) who investig ated the links between
high perform ance work systems and perform ance in a m ajor study of 44 m anuf acturing sites in steel,
app arel and medic al equipment between 1995 and 1997; they identified three types of generic people
m an agement pr actices which they thought were critic al to org anis ation al perform ance. Pl acing more
emph asis on recruitment, selection and le arning, they opined th at skill enh ancing pr actices are
import ant bec ause ch anges in work org anis ation are only effective if employees h ave adequ ate skills
to t ake up these opportunities. Motiv ation enh ancing pr actices are critic al bec ause even if it is
assumed th at employees h ave the skill and opportunity, it is essenti al th at they h ave the motiv ation
in order to t ake up these opportunities. Fin ally, involvement enh ancing pr actices are concerned with
designing online work systems and offline involvement activities so th at employees h ave the ch ance
to become involved and p articip ate in decision m aking.
There is a strong indic ation th at the key to activ ating wh at is c alled the „People-Perform ance link
lies not only in well-cr afted „bundles of HR pr actices, but in their conjunction with a powerful and
cohering org anis ation al vision and corpor ate le adership together with front-line le adership‟s action
and use of discretion ary power. Previous studies h ave shown th at implementing HRM pr actices is an
import ant me ans through which f avour able outcomes c an be promoted; Guest (2002) h as argued th at
the imp act of HRM on perform ance depends upon worker‟s response to HRM pr actices, so the imp act
will move in direction of the perception of HRM pr actices by the employee.
It h as been proven th at the presence of strong recruitment and selection pr actices, promotion al
opportunities, griev ance resolution mech anisms, flexible benefit pl ans, employee responsibility,
autonomy and te am work were found to rel ate positively to org anis ation al commitment while
compens ation cuts were neg atively associ ated with org anis ation al commitment (C aldwell, Ch atm an
& O‟Reilly, 1990; Fiorito, Bozem an, Young & Meurs, 2007; Gould-Willi ams & D avies, 2005:
Heshizer, 1994). Also promoting org anis ation al commitment is s atisf action with and perceived
adequ acy of c areer development, tr aining opportunities and perform ance appr ais al (Kuv a as, 2008).
Rese arch into the rel ationship between HRM and work eng agement though sc anty shows th at job
ch ar acteristics such as autonomy, t ask identity, skill v ariety, t ask signific ance, the job and feedb ack;
job resources (feedb ack, soci al support and supervisory co aching); and org anis ation al resources like
autonomy, tr aining and technology h ave a positive imp act on work eng agement (S al anov a, Agut
and Peiro, 2005; Sch aufeli & B akker, 2004; S aks and Rotm an, 2006).
HRM pr actices are argued to initi ate positive exch ange rel ationships especi ally when m angers are
able to provide evidence of consider ation and concern for needs of the individu al worker (Gould-
Willi ams, 2007). There seem to be no agreement on wh at constitutes HRM pr actices. Over the ye ars,
rese archers h ave proposed v arious lists of pr actices; however, there is no agreement on wh at or which
qu alifies as an aspect of HRM. It is worthy to note there are some pr actices th at form the core of the
v arious proposed lists of pr actices. Nine of these pr actices are selected for this study b ased on their
signific ance in the liter ature reviewed, their imp act and me asur ability.
„Recruitment which is the process of gener ating a pool of c ap able people to apply for employment to
an org anis ation and selection which is the process by which m an agers and others use specific
instruments to choose from a pool of applic ants a person or persons more likely to succeed in the
job(s) given m an agement go als and leg al requirements‟ Br atton and Gold (2007, p 239). Recruitment
and selection c an pl ay a pivot al role in sh aping an org anis ation‟s effectiveness and perform ance, if
org anis ations are able to acquire workers who alre ady possess relev ant knowledge, skills and
aptitudes and are also able to m ake an accur ate prediction reg arding their future abilities.
Perform ance improvement is not only a result of well functioning system but also depends on effective
hum an resource str ategies th at succeed in recruiting and m aint aining a committed and motiv ated
workforce ( Al- Ahm adi, 2009)