Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

TAXATION LAW (DEL CASTILLO) refund or credit of unutilized input VAT attributable to such

sales.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION
PRUDENTIAL BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF
BIR v. MANILA HOME TEXTILE, INC., THELMA LEE INTERNAL REVENUE
AND SAMUEL LEE Documentary Stamp Tax
Construction and Interpretation of Tax Exemptions
and Exclusions DOCTRINE: A certificate of deposit need not be in a
specific form. Thus, a passbook of an interest-earning
DOCTRINE: Taxation is the rule and tax exemption the deposit account issued by a bank is a certificate of deposit
exception. Tax exemptions should be granted only by drawing interest that is subject to documentary stamp tax.
clear and unequivocal provision of law on the basis of
language too plain to be misunderstood. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LA
TONDENA DISTILLERS, INC. Documentary Stamp
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ST. Tax
LUKE’S MEDICAL CENTER
Exemptions from Taxation DOCTRINE: Transfer of real property to a surviving
corporation pursuant to a merger is not subject to
DOCTRINE: For an institution to be completely exempt Documentary Stamp Tax (DST).
from income tax, it is required that the institution should
operate exclusively for charitable or social welfare ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION v.
purpose. In case such institution earns income from its COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
for-profit activities, it will not lose its tax exemption. Taxpayer’s Remedies
However, its income from for profit activities will be
subject to income tax at the preferential 10% rate DOCTRINE: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue
pursuant to Sec. 27(B) of the NIRC. (CIR) as well as his duly authorized representative must
indicate clearly and unequivocally to the taxpayer whether
an action constitutes a final determination on a disputed
NATIONAL TAXATION assessment. It will determine whether the taxpayer should
exhaust administrative remedies before the CIR or file an
CIR v. SM PRIME HOLDINGS appeal to the CTA.
Value – Added Tax

DOCTRINE: Legislature never intended to include CIR v. FAR EAST BANK & TRUST COMPANY (BPI)
cinema/theater operators or proprietors in the coverage of G.R. No. 173854 |15 March 2010 Taxpayer’s Remedies
VAT.
DOCTRINE: Since tax refunds partake of the nature of
J.R.A PHILIPPINES, INC. v. CIR tax exemptions, which are construed strictissimi juris
Value – Added Tax against the taxpayer, evidence in support of a claim must
likewise be strictissimi scrutinized and duly proven.
DOCTRINE: The absence of the word "zero-rated" on the
invoices/receipts is fatal to a claim for credit/refund of COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. KUDOS
input VAT. METAL CORPORATION G.R. Taxpayer’s Remedies

FORT BONIFACTIO DEV’T CORP. v. CIR DOCTRINE: The prescriptive period on when to assess
Value – Added Tax taxes benefits both the government and the taxpayer.
Exceptions extending the period to assess must,
DOCTRINE: Prior payment of taxes is not required for a therefore, be strictly construed.
taxpayer to avail of the 8% transitional input tax credit.
FORT BONIFACIO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. CIR v. SMART COMMUNICATIONS
CIR (RESOLUTION) Taxpayer’s Remedies
Value – Added Tax
DOCTRINE: The withholding agent has authority to file a
DOCTRINE: Prior payment of taxes is not required before claim for refund on behalf of the principal taxpayer
a taxpayer could avail of transitional input tax credit. because the withholding agent is considered the statutory
taxpayer, and he is an agent of the principal taxpayer.
CIR v. TOLEDO POWER COMPANY
Value – Added Tax COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AICHI
FORGING COMPANY OF ASIA, INC.
DOCTRINE: A taxpayer has 2 years from the close of the Taxpayer’s Remedies
taxable quarter when the zero-rated sales were made
within which to file with the CIR an administrative claim for
1
DOCTRINE: A taxpayer must prove not only his
entitlement to a refund but also his compliance with the
procedural due process as non-observance of the
prescriptive periods within which to file the administrative
and the judicial claims would result in the denial of his
claim.

BELLE CORPORATION v. CIR


Taxpayer’s Remedies

DOCTRINE: Once the option to carry-over excess income


tax payments to the succeeding years has been made, it
becomes irrevocable.

SILICON PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF


INTERNAL REVENUE
Taxpayer’s Remedies

DOCTRINE: The burden of proving entitlement to a


refund lies with the claimant.

BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. COURT OF


APPEALS
Government Remedies

DOCTRINE: The government is allowed to resort to all


evidence or resources available to determine a taxpayer’s
income and to use methods to reconstruct his income.

LOCAL TAXATION

CE CASECAN WATER AND ENERGY COM. v NUEVA


ECIJA
Real Property Taxation

DOCTRINE: It is the CTA that has the power to determine


whether the RTC committed grave abuse of discretion in
issuing an interlocutory order in a local tax case. Local tax
cases include cases involving RPT because RPT is a
local tax.

JUDICIAL REMEDIES

ASIA TRUST DEVELOPMENT BANK, INC. v. CIR


Judicial Procedures

DOCTRINE: An appeal to the CTA En Banc must be


preceded by the timely filing of a motion for
reconsideration or new trial with the CTA Division;
amended decisions are considered different decisions,
hence, a separate MR or MNT must be filed assailing the
same.

Вам также может понравиться