Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Supplier Development– Project Charter

PROBLEM Project Name Efficency improvement of ICT test department


During 2011 the FTY for
Period of time for baseline performance Business Metric

ICT dept was 96.0% The gap of 3.00%


Background Introduction
Business Process Baseline performance Business Gap, objective target vs.

from 99% represents 30000 euros of annualized business impact.

Business Objective Business Impact of gap

During WK 47 to wk 21 the Yretest pass for


Period of time for baseline performance Primary Metric for Project

Opportunity or ICT was 6.40% The gap of 2.40%


Problem Statement Project process Baseline performance Process objective target vs. baseline

r from 4% represents € 20,000 of business impact.

Process objective Business Impact of gap

TEAM Project Team: Signorini,Gherardi,Covucci


Project Champion Covucci

SD Project Manager Aloisi

STAKE- Business Owner(s) Signorini


HOLDERS
Finance Mutti

SCOPE IN: ICT test log files from QSOFT


Scope
OUT: FTY, RETEST PASS YIELD

Risks

Comments
GOALS Project Objective ICT FPY improvement through Yretest pass reduction

KONE Benefit KONE PCBAS ICT FTY improvement

Supplier Benefit Efficiency improvement

Primary FTY Target 99%

KPI for
Secondary 1 Yretest pass Baseline 4.02%
Success
Secondary 2 Secondary 4

Start Define: 12/21/2011 D 1/10/2012 20


Expected dates for
Days Per
Phase

delivery of key project Start Measure: 1/11/2012


Give estimated dates for
M 1/16/2012 5

MILE-STONES outcomes. delivery of outcomes for


Start Analyze: 1/16/2012 A 1/24/2012 8
(Use these dates for the each stage of the project.
site BE report and project Start Improve: 1/25/2012 I 2/11/2012 17
Gantt chart)
Start Control: 2/21/2012 C 3/2/2012 10 60

The project is to be signed ON when the Process Owner is satisfied that the project is targeted at a real business case and is properly scoped,
Sign On / Off resourced and feasible. It is highly encouraged a project is signed ON by a senior member of the finance depar

Champion Sign On: Date: Sign Off: Date:

For pilot use 400269226.xls ProjectCharter


KSO SD Project Report (for monthly reporting)
Project Name: ICT Final Test Yield Improvement Project Team SD Project Manager Finance
Supplier: Eutron
Reporting Date: 29-05-2012
Milestone Status: (D,M,A,I,C): project closed Aloisi, Aloisi G.Mutti
Covucci,Tufano,Gherardi,Signorini
DEFINE - problem statement IMPROVE - target condition

Objective
Reduction of Yretest pass from a Baseline= 6.4% to a target of 4% by end of Q1_2012.

MEASURE - current condition


Process map Capability study

Improve phase conclusion

Implementation Plan Who Deadline


Action 1 weekly analysis of data Aloisi every Monday morn
every Saturday from 14-01-
Action 2 Fixtures extraordinary maintenance Tufano 12

Action 3 Continuous monitoring of data Signorini-Tufano continuos by


watch pack

Note & Cost Update: The target of the project has been fully reached with a saving of 20K euros per year.

ANALYZE - root cause analysis CONTROL - follow-up


· Fish Bone/C&E analysis Control Plan
Binomial Process Capability Analysis of retest pass after
P C har t Rate of Defectives
action due date owner
Ishikawa diagram of retest at ICT dept
Measurements Material Personnel 0,06 1 1
1
5 Weekly analysis of data weekly Aloisi

% Defective
P r opor tion

U C L=0,04765
0,04 _

Continuous monitoring of data for quick fix


IC T o pera tor
4
D ata colle ctio n P C BA

M aint ena nce


o pera tor
P =0,03592
LC L=0,02419 3 shift Tufano
0,02 1

Review preventive maintenance plan march-12 Tufano


Yretested

Pro
1 2
be
s tat
us

Mai nten ance Fi


F ly ing prob e
Ty pe 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 0 2000 4000
xtu cl o Fi

Register maintenance on database march-12 Signorini


sur xtu
Sample Sample Size
Fix re
Na
tur ali
il s e( re
gn vac
e me sta
typ um
nt tus
e )
Bed of nails

Env ironment Methods Machines


T ests performed w ith unequal sample sizes

C umulative % Defective

S ummary S tats Tar


H istogr am
MO721 p chart UCL 0.065 and LCL 0.056 march-12 Aloisi
5,4 12
(95,0% confidence)

4,8 % Defectiv e: 3,59


9
% Defectiv e

Low er C I: 3,47
F r equency

U pper C I: 3,71
4,2
Target: 0,00 6
P P M D ef: 35919
3,6
Low er C I: 34748 3
U pper C I: 37119
3,0
P rocess Z: 1,8001 0
0 10 20 30 40 Low er C I: 1,7851 0 1 2 3 4 5
Sample U pper C I: 1,8152 % Defective

For pilot use 400269226.xls SD Project Report

Вам также может понравиться