Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

10/25/2018 Mathcha

Martin Saa
224009495
Aero 430
HW 6

Axisymmetric Heat Conduction Analysis for Composite Pipe

1. Problem
1.

2. The problem is governed by the following equations and conditions


1.

1. It is to be noted that to bottom 2 equations are jump conditions


2.

du
3. Q(x)=2∗π∗x*q(x) , q(x) = -𝛾
dx
4. X1 = 3 , X3 = 6. 5

https://www.mathcha.io/editor 1/7
10/25/2018 Mathcha

5. T(X1) = 500 , Tenv = 20


6. 𝛾ss = 0. 90 ; 𝛾cs = 2. 10 ; 𝛽 = 0. 55

https://www.mathcha.io/editor 2/7
10/25/2018 Mathcha

2. Elemental Derivation
1. Noting that heat conduction is axisymmetric
2. From equation set (1), we can conclude the following
1. Q(x) = constant → Q’(x) = 0
2. Q 1 = Qi-1 + 0
i-
2
3. -Q 1 = -Qi - 0
i-
2
4. (-Qi - 0 ) + (Qi-1 + 0) = 0
3. Using the definition of Q from section 1.2.3 , and the above, we can derive the following for
each element
1. element j ; j ∈ Xi-1 , Xi
1. Qi-1 + 0 = - 2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ x 1 ⋅ 𝛾 ⋅ u' 1
i- i-
2 2

2. -Qi - 0 = 2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ x 1 ⋅ 𝛾 ⋅ u' 1
i-i-
2 2
b. 2 ≡ Kj21 + Kj22 ⋅u '
1
i-
2
2. Using the center difference estimate for u':
ui - ui-1
u' 1 =
i-
2
h

ui - ui-1
1. Qi-1 + 0 = -2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ x 1 ⋅ 𝛾 ⋅
i- h
2
j j
a . ≡ K11 ⋅ ui-1 + K12 ⋅ ui

j
2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾 j
2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾
b. ∴ K11 = , ∴ K12 = -
h h

ui - ui
2. Similarly, -Qi - 0 = 2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ x 1 ⋅ 𝛾 ⋅
i- h
2
j j
a . ≡ K21 ⋅ ui-1 + K22 ⋅ ui

j
2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾 j j
2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾
b. ∴ K21 = - =K12 , ∴ K22 = = Kj11
h h

3. Now for element j + 1 ; j ∈ Xi , Xi+1

ui+1 - ui
1. Qi + 0 = -2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ x 1 ⋅ 𝛾 ⋅
i+ h
2
a.≡ Kj11+1 ⋅ ui + Kj12+1 ⋅ ui+1
2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾 2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾
j+1 j+1
b. ∴ K11 = , ∴ K12 = -
h h
https://www.mathcha.io/editor 3/7
10/25/2018 Mathcha

ui+1 - ui
2. Similarly, -Qi+1 - 0 = 2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ x 1 ⋅ 𝛾 ⋅
i+ h
2
j j+1
a . ≡ K21 ⋅ ui + K22 ⋅ ui+1
2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾 2 ⋅ 𝜋 ⋅ xmid ⋅ 𝛾
j+1 j j+1
b. ∴ K21 = - =K12 , ∴ K22 = = Kj11
h h

4. At the element j ∈ Xi-1, Xi containing the interface; Xi-1 < X2 < Xi

x22 - x2i-1 ⋅ 𝛾1 x2i - x22 ⋅ 𝛾2


j j
a. K21 = K12 = - + ⋅ (2 ⋅ 𝜋)2
2h 2h
x22 - x2i-1 ⋅ 𝛾1 x2i - x22 ⋅ 𝛾2
b.Kj22 = Kj11 = + ⋅ (2 ⋅ 𝜋)2
2h 2h
5. Through this we find the local K matrix for each element

4. After constructing the Q(x) equations for all elements j1... jN, we have the following
1. At every interior grid point, i2... iN:
j j
a. -Qi - 0 = K21 ⋅ ui-1 + K22 ⋅ ui
j+1 j+1
b. Qi + 0 = K11 ⋅ ui + K12 ⋅ ui+1
c. Bringing condition 2.2.4
j+1
j
1. K21 ⋅ ui-1 + K22 + K11
j
⋅ ui + Kj12+1 ⋅ ui+1 = 0
2. At the outside grid points
a. K111 ⋅ u1 + K112 ⋅ u2 = Q1
b. KN N
21 ⋅ uN + K22 ⋅ uN+1 = -QN+1
3. Using this system of equations, we can build a tri-diagonal matrix and solve for ui
a. This is also called assembling the global K matrix

https://www.mathcha.io/editor 4/7
10/25/2018 Mathcha

3. Analytical Solution
1. The process for finding the analytical solution is outlined in the book

2. Finding a value for C, the temperature, u, can be solved for across the pipe

https://www.mathcha.io/editor 5/7
10/25/2018 Mathcha

4. Results
Note that this was run for meshes with elements of { 32, 16... 1 }
Plotting the Error vs Location for the multiple meshes:

Plotting the Error vs H (𝛿x) | Convergence Plot

Now the convergence table

H(cm) error A error A (extrapolated)


https://www.mathcha.io/editor 6/7
10/25/2018 Mathcha

3.50000 1.32212 0.34571


1.75000 0.58982 0.20930
0.87500 0.30443 0.02183
0.43750 0.05973 0.00556
0.21875 0.01910 0.01553
0.10938 0.00687 ----------

H(cm) error B error B (extrapolated)


3.50000 1.35085 0.36034
1.75000 0.60796 0.21933
0.87500 0.31649 0.01188
0.43750 0.07021 0.00969
0.21875 0.02482 0.01755
0.10938 0.00696 0.00000

Some more tables to show accuracy

https://www.mathcha.io/editor 7/7

Вам также может понравиться