Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Answers to Problems
1(a).
Net Income 400,000
Return on Total Equity 34.5% or using the 3 components :
Equity 1,160,000
1(d). Using the ROE of 20.7 in part c) and a net income of $240,000, we have
2(a). ROE = Net profit margin x Total asset turnover x Total assets/equity
Company K: ROE = 0.04 x 2.2 x 2.4 = .2112
Company L: ROE = 0.06 x 2.0 x 2.2 = .2640
Company M: ROE = 0.10 x 1.4 x 1.5 = .2100
4.
2010 2014
4(a). To clarify a point of possible confusion: operating income in the problem set-up excludes
depreciation; we need to subtract it from operating income to obtain the appropriate ROE
(NI/Equity = 19/159 = 11.93% for 2010, 30/220 = 13.6% for 2014).
Return on (ROE) = [(Op. Margin x Asset Turnover) - Int. Burden] x Equity Financial
Leverage x (100% - Income Tax Rate)
4(b). Asset turnover measures the ability of a company to minimize the level of assets (current
and fixed) to support its level of sales. The asset turnover increased substantially over the
period thus contributing to an increase in the ROE.
Financial leverage measures the amount of financing outside of equity including short and
long-term debt. Financial leverage declined over the period thus adversely affected the
ROE. Since asset turnover rose substantially more than financial leverage declined, the net
effect was an increase in ROE.
In adjusting for the sold accounts receivable and treating it as a secured loan, operating income
(EBITDA) should be increased by the interest income ($40,000). This treatment assumes that the
“loan proceeds” from the financed receivables would be invested to generate interest income (for
simplicity's sake, the same rate of interest is assumed, but an alternative rate could be justified). The
financing costs of the loan ($40,000) would be added to interest expense and will not affect
EBITDA.
In adjusting for the operating lease and treating it as a capital lease, interest expense for the first
year of the lease ($614,400) should be added to adjusted interest expense.
In adjusting for the guarantee of the affiliate's debt and treating it as internal long-term debt, long-
term debt should be increased by the amount of the guarantee ($995,000).
In adjusting for the operating lease and treating it as a capital lease, long-term debt should be
increased by the present value of the lease ($6,144,000) less the current or short-term portion—the
principal due in the next 12 months ($1,000,000 - $614,400 = $385,600).
In adjusting for the sold accounts receivable and treating it as a secured loan, accounts receivable
(current assets) and notes payable (current liabilities) should both be increased by the amount of the
sale ($500,000).
In adjusting for the operating lease and treating it as a capital lease, leases payable (current liabilities)
should be increased by the principal due in the next 12 months on the lease. This is equal to the
annual lease payment less the first year's interest expense ($1,000,000 - $614,400 = $385,600).