Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 11

Lupus (2018) 27, 1404–1414

journals.sagepub.com/home/lup

REVIEW

Neurologic manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome


IF Ricarte1, LA Dutra1,2, FF Abrantes1, FF Toso1, OGP Barsottini1, GS Silva1,2, AWS de Souza3 and D Andrade3
1
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil; 2Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil;
3
Rheumatology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; and 4Rheumatology Division,
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Neurological involvement in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is common, and its


occurrence increases morbidity and mortality. Patients may present variable neurological
involvement, such as cerebrovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, headache, seizures, move-
ment disorders, multiple sclerosis-like syndrome, transverse myelitis and ocular symptoms.
Most neurological manifestations are associated with thrombosis of the microcirculation or of
large vessels; nonetheless, there is compelling evidence suggesting that, in some cases, symp-
toms are secondary to an immune-mediated pathogenesis, with direct binding of aPL on
neurons and glia. Herein we describe clinical characteristics and management of neurological
APS manifestations. Lupus (2018) 27, 1404–1414.

Key words: Antiphospholipid syndrome; antiphospholipid antibodies; APS; central nervous


system; neurological manifestations; stroke

Introduction recently APS neurological manifestations were clas-


sified as thrombotic and non-thrombotic.6 Central
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic nervous system (CNS) thrombotic manifestations
autoimmune disorder defined by venous and/or include stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA),
arterial thrombosis, and pregnancy morbidity in and cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). CNS
the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). non-thrombotic manifestations include cognitive
Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are found in 70% dysfunction (CD), migraine, seizure, multiple scler-
of the cases, lupus anticoagulant (LA) in 20% and osis (MS)-like syndrome, transverse myelitis (TM),
anti-b2 glycoprotein antibodies (anti-b2GPI) in movement disorders, and psychiatric symp-
10%, either isolated or in combination.1–4 For toms.6–10 We aim to review neurological manifest-
APS diagnosis, patients should meet the clinical ations in APS, discussing diagnosis and
and laboratory criteria of Sidney classification management.
(Table 1).1
Neurological involvement in APS is common,
and its occurrence increases morbidity and mortal- Pathophysiology
ity.2 Solely aPL positivity in association with
neurological manifestations should be interpreted Although the mechanisms of cerebral involvement
carefully for the following reasons: lack of control in APS are not completely understood,9,11 data
at 12 weeks apart, discrepancies in methods for aPL suggest that aPLs induce a prothrombotic state
detection and low titers. through: (a) interference with endogenous anti-
The original description from Hughes included coagulant mechanisms (disruption of the annexin
cerebrovascular disease and myelitis as APS neuro- A5 anticoagulant shield, inhibition of protein C
logical manifestations.5 Thereafter, a wide spec- pathway, inhibition of antithrombin); (b) binding
trum of manifestations were described and more and activation of platelets; (c) inducing expression
of adhesion molecules and tissue factor in endo-
thelial cells; and (d) activation of the complement
Correspondence to: Lı́via Almeida Dutra, Universidade Federal de
São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo 650, São Paulo, SP 04039-002, Brazil.
cascade.12,13 However, many of the CNS manifest-
Email: liviaadutra@hotmail.com ations cannot be explained solely by thrombotic
Received 19 December 2017; accepted 17 April 2018 events.9,11 Direct binding of aPL to CNS antigens
! The Author(s), 2018. Reprints and permissions: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav 10.1177/0961203318776110
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1405
a 23
Table 1 Revised classification criteria for APS. to lacunar and subcortical IS. Nonetheless, intra-
cranianal stem or branch arterial occlusions and
Clinical criteria (at least one of the following):
1. Vascular thrombosis stenosis were reported in 50% of APS patients
 One or more clinical episodes of arterial, venous, or small vessel with stroke.24 In the absence of cardiogenic
thrombosis, in any tissue or organ. source of emboli, in situ thrombosis appears to be
2. Pregnancy morbidity
 One or more unexplained deaths of a morphologically normal fetus the most likely mechanism for arterial occlusion.25
at or beyond the 10th week of gestation. Narrowing of multiple intracranial arteries (vascu-
 One or more premature births of a morphologically normal neonate
before the 34th week of gestation because of eclampsia or severe
litis-like pattern) may occur in APS and indicates
preeclampsia (placental insufficiency). vasculopathy rather than inflammation of the
 Three or more unexplained consecutive spontaneous abortions vessel wall.25
before the 10th week of gestation.
Laboratory criteria (at least one):
Occasionally, the extracranial carotid artery may
1. Anticardiolipin antibody immunoglobulin (Ig)G and/or IgM isotype be involved. In one of only a few reports of angio-
in medium or high titer (>40 GPL or MPL, or >the 99th percentile), graphic findings in APS patients with stroke, 7 of
on two or more occasions, at least 12 weeks apart.
2. Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I antibody IgG and/or IgM in titer >the
17 patients (32%) had extracranial arterial abnorm-
99th percentile or >40 IU, present on two or more occasions, at alities. This latter study classified the abnormalities
least 12 weeks apart. into three types: common carotid or internal caro-
3. Lupus anticoagulant in plasma, on two or more occasions at least
12 weeks apart, detected according to the guidelines of the tid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion, stenosis or
International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. occlusion of the origin of two or more great vessels
APS: Antiphospholipid syndrome; IU: international units.
(Takayasu-like pattern) and narrowing of the ICA
a
Adapted from Miyakis.1 in a pattern typical of atherosclerotic disease.25
Rarely, APS may overlap with Takayasu arter-
itis.26–28 Two small studies using digital angiog-
raphy reported that approximately 30% of APS
has also been postulated.14,15 Data from in vitro patients with stroke presented extracranial abnorm-
experiments and animal models support the idea
alities.25 However, other studies reported a preva-
of an immune-mediated pathogenesis in which
lence of 15% of asymptomatic carotid stenosis,
aPL directly binds neurons and glial cells.9,11
using vascular ultrasound.29 A recent meta-analysis
Moreover, anti-B2GPI also binds to endothelial
showed that patients with APS have higher fre-
cells,9 disrupting blood–brain barrier permeability,
quency of carotid plaques when compared to
causing inflammation and neurodegeneration.9,11
patients without the syndrome. However, these
results were not confirmed in patients with primary
APS (pAPS).30 The natural progression of carotid
Neurological manifestations in APS extracranial stenosis in APS in unknown.31
Cerebral embolism in APS is associated with left
Cerebrovascular disease cardiac valvular abnormalities and, rarely, intracar-
Ischemic stroke and TIA diac thrombus.13 The valvular pathologies include
Ischemic stroke (IS) is the most common and severe irregular thickening of the valve leaflets due to
arterial complication of APS.6,16 In the Euro- deposition of immune complexes, vegetations
Phospholipid Project Group Study, the cumulative (Libman–Sacks endocarditis), and valve dysfunc-
prevalence of stroke was 19.8% and TIA, 11.1%.17 tion.13,32 The mitral valve is the most commonly
It has been suggested that more than 20% of affected and mitral insufficiency the most common
strokes in patients younger than 45 years are asso- lesion.33,34 Cardiac involvement was found between
ciated with APS;18 however, this estimate may be 10% to 60% of APS patients using transthoracic
inaccurate due to potential referral bias.13 Patients echocardiography.32 Transesophageal echocardio-
with stroke and aPL positivity are younger and are gram (TEE) detects cardiac involvement in 75.9%
more likely to be female than aPL-negative stroke to 82% of patients.32
patients.8 The data on the association between APS patients with stroke should be evaluated
aPLs and stroke recurrence in older patients is preferably with brain magnetic resonance imaging
conflicting.19 (MRI), intracranial and extracranial vascular ima-
Stroke mechanism in APS may be either throm- ging (MRI or computerized tomography (CT)
botic or cardioembolic.8,13 Clinical manifestation angiogram). Given the frequently found cardiac
of APS-associated IS depends on the location and abnormalities, some authors recommend TEE in
size of the occluded vessel.20–22 Cerebrovascular all APS patient with stroke13 The risk of stroke
disease frequently involves small arteries leading for LA-positive patients was multiplied twofold in
Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1406

smokers and was multiplied sixfold in smokers hyperreflexia, and asymmetrical quadriparesis.51
receiving oral contraceptives.35 The most frequent finding on MRI is cerebral
Whether atherosclerosis is associated with circu- atrophy.51
lating aPLs or occurs secondary to co-occurring Sneddon’s syndrome is characterized by non-
risk factors is a matter of debate.36–40 inflammatory thrombotic vasculopathy, cerebro-
Hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, vascular disease (stroke and TIA) and livedo
obesity, and tobacco use should be managed to reticularis (LR).52 Other neurological symptoms
minimize additional thrombotic risks.13 are headache, cerebral hemorrhage, seizures, cogni-
tive and psychiatric disturbances. Skin biopsy may
Less common types of cerebrovascular disease reveal thrombosis of subcutaneous arterioles and
CVT usually presents with refractory headache and compensatory capillary dilation with blood stagna-
nausea, occasionally associated with seizures, focal tion causing livedo reticularis.52–54 Approximately
deficits, or intracranial hypertension. MRI or CT 40–50% of patients with Sneddon’s syndrome pre-
venous angiogram should be performed when CVT sent aPL antibodies, suggesting that some patients
is suspected as sensibility of noncontrast CT ima- should be classified as APS.52
ging is around 30% for CVT diagnosis.41 In
patients with CVT, reported frequency of aCL Cognitive dysfunction
positivity ranged from 7% to 22%.42,43 APS is
CD is a decline in prior cognitive performance and
responsible for approximately 6–17% of cases,
is present in several rheumatic diseases. In aPL-
being one of the prothrombotic conditions most
positive patients, the frequency of CD ranges
frequently associated with CVT.44 The presence of
between 19% and 40%.7 In pAPS, 42–80% of
aCL predisposes to CVT at a relatively younger age
patients develop CD (usually a subcortical pattern,
and to a more extensive cerebral venous
characterized by impairment in attention, concen-
involvement.44
tration, information processing speed and executive
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome
functioning.7,55 CD may occur in a spectrum and
(RCVS), which is characterized by thunderclap
some patients may present mild cognitive impair-
headaches, and neurological deficits associated
ment and others dementia.14,56,57 APS patients with
with transitory constriction of cerebral arteries,
dementia were older, and more commonly pre-
was described in APS.45 RCVS manifestations are
sented abnormal brain CT and electroencephalo-
attributed to a transient disturbance of the arterial
gram (EEG) when compared to non-demented
tone regulation. Thunderclap headache, which is a
patients.57
severe pain peaking in seconds, is usually the first
There is an association between neuropsycho-
symptom and typically recurs within the first
logical deficits, livedo reticularis and white matter
2 weeks, IS or hemorrhagic stroke being the
lesions (WMLs) on brain MRI in patients with
major complications.46–48
APS.56 Nonetheless, CD occurs independently of
There are a few reports regarding the association
previous neurological involvement and cannot be
between aPL and Moyamoya disease,49 a vasculo-
explained solely by vascular pathology.56 Animal
pathy of unknown aetiology characterized by pro-
models showed that cognitive dysfunction was not
gressive narrowing of the anterior vasculature of
associated with the vascular ischemic lesions.58
the brain with the formation of a collateral vessels.
Moreover, intraventricular injection of neuronal-
Moyamoya vasculopathy is found in other variable
binding IgG from APS patients in mice impairs
conditions such as neurofibromatosis type 1, Sickle-
cognitive performance in the swimming maze, sug-
cell disease or Down’s syndrome,50 Of the 16 cases
gesting a direct effect of aPL in cognitive impair-
reported in a small series of Moyamoya and aPL,
ment, learning and memory.14 This supports the
21% fulfilled APS criteria. Nonetheless, 65% of the
concept that CD is multifactorial and that ischemic
described cases presented various comorbidities
events, genetic predisposition, antibody specificity,
and some of them were found to be associated
exposure time to antibodies and blood-brain bar-
with Moyamoya, such as autoimmune thyroid dis-
rier disruption leading to direct binding of aPL to
ease, SLE, and type 1 diabetes mellitus.49
the brain may play a role.58
Acute ischemic encephalopathy is a rare feature
of SLE patients, with aPLs found in only 1.1% of
Migraine
patients from the EuroPhospholipid Project Group
study.17 This neurologic manifestation was first Headache is the most prevalent neurological mani-
described in association with APS in 1989, and is festation in APS, with migraine being the most
characterized by confusion, disorientation, common type. Estimated migraine prevalence in
Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1407
59
APS is around 20% of patients. Antiphospholipid thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity
antibodies are more prevalent among migraineurs strongly suggest APS rather than MS.16
(12% vs 3%) when compared to controls, suggest- Several studies evaluated aPL in definite MS
ing that migraine might be an early APS symptom patients and in MS-like patients; however, their rele-
or a comorbid condition.60 Migraine associated vance are still unknown due high variability findings
with APS may be difficult to control with typical and methodological limitations. Prevalence of aCL
analgesic regimens and occurs years before the of 6% for the IgG isotype and between 2% and 69%
diagnosis.6,61 for the IgM isotype in MS patients have been
One possible mechanism for migraine and APS described.7,78,79
association is the platelet activation and alterations
in serotonin metabolism driven by APS,61 leading Transverse myelitis
to a central neurochemical imbalance of this neuro-
transmitter implicated in migraine pathophysi- TM is a rare neurologic complication of APS with a
ology. Nonetheless, due to methodological prevalence estimated of 0.4–4% of APS
limitations of previous studies that evaluated patients.17,80 TM is characterized by acute inflam-
migraine in APS, there is not enough evidence to mation that may affect the white and gray matter of
support a clear association between migraine the spinal cord.81,82 Clinical presentation is charac-
and APS.62 terized by motor neurologic dysfunction, associated
with sensory abnormalities and sphincter disturb-
Seizures and epilepsy ances.81 Pathophysiology involved is uncertain,
although vasculitis and arterial thrombosis result-
Estimated seizure prevalence among APS patients ing in ischemic cord necrosis have been suggested.16
is 3.2–10%.63–65 Almost half of the patients develop Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
epilepsy after APS diagnosis.64 Seizures occurs in (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disorder character-
patients with abnormal or normal brain MRIs, sug- ized by recurrent episodes of optic neuritis (ON)
gesting a direct effect of autoantibodies,63 altering and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis
the depolarization and membrane permeability, (LETM) defined as a lesion involving three
reducing GABA response and binding to neuro- or more contiguous vertebral segments.83
transmitters.66–68 Apart from stroke, other risk fac- Approximately 70% of the patients harbor aqua-
tors for seizures are tobacco use, livedo reticularis
porin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG).83 Because NMO and
and valvular heart disease.63,65
APS may occur in overlap, patients with APS pre-
The association between seizures with aPL anti-
senting with myelitis or ON should be screened for
bodies is still a matter of debate due conflicting
AQP4-IgG.84
results.62,69–71 In non-SLE patients, a positive asso-
ciation was described, with prevalence of aPL
Neuro-ophthalmologic involvement
reported between 19%– 43%.66,72–74 Studies are
difficult to compare due to lack of large case- Amaurosis fugax refers to a transient loss of vision
control studies, heterogeneity in aPL testing, exclu- in one or both eyes. It is one of the most common
sion of APS patients with history of stroke, and ocular manifestations of APS and indicates cerebral
inclusion of secondary APS (sAPS).7 ischemia,6 being reported in 5.4% of patients in a
large cohort.17
MS-like syndrome Optic neuropathy (ON) is a rare manifestation of
MS-like syndrome, also called lupoid sclerosis, was APS, occurring in 1% of the patients.17 It may pre-
described as a rare neurologic manifestation of pri- sent either anterior non-arteritic ischemic optic
mary APS.75 Patients may present unbalance, neuropathy (NAION) or retrobulbar ON.85
visual or sensory complaints and other neurological NAION develops as a result of ciliary blood vessels
deficits with relapsing–remitting course, similar to thrombosis, whereas retrobulbar optic neuropathy
MS.76 Furthermore, APS patients may present probably involves thrombotic and inflammatory
brain MRI with T2 hyperintense brain lesions, mechanisms.86 Both are characterized by sudden
which may not be easily differentiated from MS.77 visual decline and unilateral color vision impair-
In these particular cases, a careful interview may be ment; nonetheless, papillary edema with linear
helpful in distinguishing between MS and APS: the hemorrhages are considered as a typical NAION
acute onset and resolution of symptoms, especially feature.85 Retrobulbar ON is most frequently
regarding visual symptoms (i.e. amaurosis fugax), found in secondary APS, but it has also been
presence of headache or epilepsy, prior history of reported in primary APS.85
Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1408

Rarely, an orbital ischemic syndrome, character- tremor, tics, corticobasal degeneration-like syn-
ized by bilateral ophthalmoparesis, proptosis, drome parkinsonism and progressive supranuclear
increase of intraocular pressure and necrosis of palsy phenotype; both syndromes with poor
orbital tissue, may be found in patients with cata- response to levodopa.91–93 Movement disorders in
strophic APS (CAPS).87 APS are more commonly associated with a
thrombo-occlusive vasculopathy, often associated
Psychiatric manifestations with cerebral infarctions and white-matter changes
APS patients may present several psychiatric syn- on brain MRI. Nonetheless, an immune-mediated
dromes including psychosis, mania, acute depres- neuronal attack against the basal ganglia was also
sion, bipolar disorders, obsessive–compulsive reported.7,93,94
disorders and schizophrenia.7 Risk factors asso-
ciated with psychiatric disorders in APS are older Neuroimaging
age, cerebral ischemia and triple positivity.7,88 In a Neuroimaging abnormalities have been reported in
retrospective cohort analysis of 100 Iranian 35% to 90% of APS patients.95 Most common
patients APS, more than 10% of patients with findings were infarcts, reported in 22% to 45.7%,
APS presented with depression.89 Another study and white-matter hyperintensities (WMH) found in
suggested that risk for depression and anxiety 17% to 45% of pAPS patients (Figure 1).23,96–98
among APS patients ranged from 1.57 to 1.64.88 Ischemic lesions can be small or large and involve
Increased levels of aCL and LA have been both superficial and deeper areas of the brain
detected in patients with schizophrenia. The fre- (Figure 2).22,23 The WMH lesions are non-specific
quency of aCL in psychotic patients varied from and similar to those seen in demyelinating, inflam-
4 to 24% among studies.7 matory, or vascular diseases.22,95 Recent studies
using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), detected ear-
Movement disorders lier microstructural white matter abnormalities in
Chorea, although rare, is the movement disorder APS, compatible with alterations in axonal struc-
most frequently described in patients with primary ture and in the myelin sheath.99
APS, and is found in 1.3–4.5% of patients.17,90 Data Another frequent finding in patients with APS is
is limited mostly to case reports. It occurs most often brain atrophy (Figure 3). It has been reported in
in women and severity is mild to moderate.90,91 12–36% of patients, isolated or associated with par-
Movement disorders rarely found in APS are dys- enchymal lesions.23,95,96,100 A significant correl-
tonia, ballismus, paroxismal dyscinesias, myoclonus, ation was found between brain atrophy and LA.100

Figure 1 MRI in APS. Axial fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images showing multiple white-matter hyperintensities.
MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; APS: antiphospholipid syndrome.

Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1409

Figure 2 Brain MRI showing different stroke patterns in APS. (a) FLAIR sequence: small lacunar infarct (arrow). (b) Diffusion-
weighted sequence: right middle cerebral artery infarction, illustrating a large-vessel ischemic stroke (arrow). (c) FLAIR sequence:
cortical infarction (arrow).

Figure 3 Cortical atrophy in APS. A 57-year-old female with primary APS and cognitive impairment. She was triple positive for
aPL antibodies. (a)–(c) Brain MRI T1 sequence with global cortical atrophy. (a) Observe the cortical atrophy (arrow), (b) Sylvian
fissure atrophy (arrow), (c) temporal lobe atrophy (arrow).

Management and treatment Antiphospholipid Antibodies reinforced that INR


>3.0 or INR 2.0–3.0 and an antiplatelet agent
Management of neurologic thrombotic manifestations
should be used for secondary thromboprophylaxis
Long-term anticoagulation with oral warfarin is the in patients with APS with arterial thrombotic
cornerstone treatment in APS.101 Patients with def- events;103 however, this recommendation did not
inite APS and first venous thrombosis event should reach panel consensus,101,103 due to lack of clinical
receive oral anticoagulation with heparin trials and alternative explanations for stroke rather
bridging.101 than thrombosis in APS,102
There remains a lack of consensus regarding The recurrence of thrombotic events is mostly
optimal antithrombotic management of patients associated with inadequate anticoagulation.104
with ischemic stroke/TIA and APS.101–103 Data When recurrence occurs in patients within INR
of the XV International Congress on therapeutic of 2.0–3.0, target should be increased
Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1410

to 3.0–4.0 or aspirin should be added.104,105 For IP10, sCD40L, and sTF) by 50% in aPL-positive
patients who are inadequately anticoagulated with patients.114
warfarin, an alternative is low molecular weight Based on the available data, statins cannot be
heparin (LMWH).104 Rituximab, intravenous recommended in APS patients in the absence of
immunoglobulin and plasma exchange have been hyperlipidemia. However, a subgroup of aPL-positive
used in refractory cases despite adequate patients with recurrent thrombosis despite adequate
anticoagulation.105,106 anticoagulation might benefit from statins.109

Direct oral anticoagulants Management of non-thrombotic neurological


The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), manifestations
such as direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) There are limited data on the treatment of non-
and anti-factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban and thrombotic neurological APS and most therapeutic
edoxaban) remains unclear. Recently, a systematic options are based on case reports or retrospective
literature review identified 122 published APS non-randomized studies.91,92,115–118 Considering
patients treated with DOACs; among them 19 the potential autoimmune mechanism of these
experienced recurrent thrombosis while on manifestations, one would suggest that antiplatelet
DOACs. Triple positivity (positivity of all three or anticoagulant agents would play a minor role in
laboratory criteria for APS) was associated with a the treatment.4 Conversely, evidence of improve-
3.5-fold increased risk of recurrent thrombosis.107 ment has been reported in patients with refractory
The RAPS trial, a randomized controlled, open migraine,115,116 psychiatric disorders (obsessive–
label non-inferiority trial that compared rivaroxa- compulsive behavior) and movement disorders.117
ban with warfarin in APS patients showed that There are reports of cognitive improvement of
endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) for rivarox- patients on anticoagulation due to other clinical
aban did not reach the non-inferiority threshold, manifestations,18 although some authors recom-
but there was no increase in thrombotic risk com- mend low-dose antiplatelet therapy combined
pared with standard-intensity warfarin. It did not with hydroxichloroquine,77,104
include patients with previous arterial manifest- Prednisone and neuroleptics appear to be effect-
ations or with recurrent venous thrombosis while ive in most of the patients with chorea and APS,91
on therapeutic warfarin dose. Moreover, a low per- Benefit of early steroid has also been reported in
centage of patients with triple positivity was treatment of psychotic symptoms.118 Intravenous
included (25 %).108 immunoglobulin therapy has shown a beneficial
Current guidelines recommend the use of effect against chorea in pediatric cases.119
DOACs for patients with known warfarin allergy, In patients with atypical demyelinating syn-
warfarin intolerance, or poor anticoagulation con- dromes or transverse myelitis there are reports of
trol.109 Several trials in thrombotic APS (TRAPS antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy in addition
and ASTRO-APS) are ongoing and will help to to steroids and immunosuppressive agents.4
establish the role of DOACs in the management The RITAPS study, an open-label phase II pilot
of APS.110,111 study, observed the effectiveness and safety of
rituximab for the treatment of non-criteria aPL
Hydroxychloroquine manifestations (thrombocytopenia, cardiac valve
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) should be used as an disease, skin ulcer, aPL nephropathy, and/or cog-
adjunctive treatment in APS refractory nitive dysfunction) in patients with primary APS,
cases.109,112,113 However, randomized clinical trials including six patients with cognitive dysfunction.
should confirm the efficacy and safety of HCQ in Although the sample size was small, the authors
APS patients for both primary and secondary observed an improvement in attention, visuomotor
thrombosis prevention.109,113 speed, and flexibility.120

Statins
Statins presents anti-inflammatory effects and Conclusion
potential to reduce b2-GPI-endothelium bind-
ing.104,105 A prospective open-label pilot study of Neurological manifestations are variable and fre-
fluvastatin 40 mg daily for 3 months showed signifi- quently found among APS patients.
cantly reduction of proinflammatory and pro- Pathophysiology involves both thrombotic and
thrombotic biomarkers (IL1b, VEGF, TNFa, non-thrombotic mechanisms. Most manifestation
Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1411

are managed with long-term oral anticoagulation, 14 Shoenfeld Y, Nahum A, Korczyn AD, Dano M, Rabinowitz R,
Beilin O, et al. Neuronal-binding antibodies from patients with
although non-thrombotic neurological manifest- antiphospholipid syndrome induce cognitive deficits following
ations may benefit from immunomodulation (ster- intrathecal passive transfer. Lupus 2003; 12(6): 436–442.
oids, IVIG, hydroxichloroquine and rituximab). 15 Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Bonnet C, Jankovic J. Movement disorders
in systemic lupus erythematosus and the antiphospholipid syn-
Despite a growing body of evidence that patho- drome. J Neural Transm 2013; 120(11): 1579–1589.
genic mechanisms are involved in APS, additional 16 Arnson Y, Shoenfeld Y, Alon E, Amital H. The antiphospholipid
studies regarding clinical course of neurological syndrome as a neurological disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010;
40(2): 97–108.
manifestations and therapeutic options are needed. 17 Cervera R, Piette JC, Font J, Khamashta MA, Shoenfeld Y,
Camps MT, et al. Antiphospholipid syndrome: Clinical and
immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in
a cohort of 1,000 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46(4): 1019–1027.
Declaration of conflicting interests 18 Hughes G. Migraine, memory loss, and ‘‘multiple sclerosis’’;
Neurological features of the antiphospholipid (Hughes’) syndrome.
Postgrad Med J 2003; 79(928): 81–83.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of inter- 19 Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz
est with respect to the research, authorship, and/or MI, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of
stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a
publication of this article. guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014; 45(7):
2160–2236.
20 Amorim LC de, Maia FM, Rodrigues CE. Stroke in systemic lupus
Funding erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome: risk factors, clin-
ical manifestations, neuroimaging, and treatment. Lupus 2017;
The authors received no financial support for the 26(5): 529–536.
21 Tanne D, Hassin-Baer S. Neurologic manifestations of the anti-
research, authorship, and/or publication of this phospholipid syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2001; 3(4): 286–292.
article. 22 Graf J. Central nervous system manifestations of antiphospholipid
syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2017; 43(4): 547–560.
23 Provenzale JM, Barboriak DP, Allen NB, Ortel TL. Patients with
antiphospholipid antibodies: CT and MR findings of the brain.
References AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 1573–1578.
24 Babikian VL. Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with
antiphospholipid antibodies and cerebral ischemia. The
1 Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Stroke Study Group. Stroke
Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update 1990; 21(9): 1268–1273.
of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome 25 Provenzale JM, Barboriak DP, Allen NB, Ortel TL.
(APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4(2): 295–306. Antiphospholipid antibodies: findings at arteriography. Am J
2 Jerrold S, Levine MD. The antiphospholipid syndrome. N Engl J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 611–616.
Med 2002; 346(10): 752–763. 26 Santiago MB, Paz O. Rare association of antiphospholipid syn-
3 Cervera R. Antiphospholipid syndrome. In: Abstracts, 7th drome and Takayasu arteritis. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26(5):
International Symposium on Women’s Health Issues in Thrombosis 821–822.
and Haemostasis, Barcelona, Spain, 3–5 March 2017. Issy les 27 Das SK, Saran RK, Parihar A. Is aorto-arteritis a manifestation of
Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson SAS, 2017; 151: S43–S47. primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome? Lupus 2011; 20(14):
4 Espinosa G, Cervera R. Current treatment of antiphospholipid 1554–1556.
syndrome: lights and shadows. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015; 11(10): 28 Fukui S, Hirota S, Iwamoto N, Karata H, Kawakami A. Takayasu
586–596. arteritis with antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibody-posi-
5 Hughes GR. Thrombosis, abortion, cerebral disease, and the lupus tive antiphospholipid syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;
anticoagulant. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983; 287(6399): 94(51): e2345.
1088–1089. 29 Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Kanellopoulos PG, Ioannidis JP,
6 Sanna G, D’Cruz D, Cuadrado MJ. Cerebral manifestations in the Tektonidou MG, Mastorakou I, Moutsopoulos HM.
antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am Atherosclerosis in premenopausal women with antiphospholipid
2006; 32(3): 465–490. syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus: a controlled study.
7 Yelnik CM, Kozora E, Appenzeller S. Non-stroke central neuro- Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42(5): 645–651.
logic manifestations in antiphospholipid syndrome. Curr 30 Ambrosino P, Lupoli R, Di Minno A, Iervolino S, Peluso R,
Rheumatol Rep 2016; 18(2): 11. Di Minno MND. Markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with
8 Rodrigues CEM, Carvalho JF, Shoenfeld Y. Neurological mani- antiphospholipid syndrome: a meta-analysis of literature studies.
festations of anti- phospholipid syndrome. Eur J Clin Invest 2010; Ann Med 2014; 46(8): 693–702.
40(4): 350–359. 31 Anand P, Mann SK, Lansberg MG, Fischbein NJ. Bilateral inter-
9 Gris JC, Nobile B, Bouvier S. Neuropsychiatric presentations of nal carotid artery occlusion associated with the antiphospholipid
antiphospholipid antibodies. Thromb Res 2015; 135 (Suppl 1): antibody syndrome. Case Rep Neurol 2014; 6(1): 50–54.
S56–S59. 32 Erdogan D, Goren MT, Diz-Kucukkaya R, Inanc M. Assessment
10 Sanna G, Bertolaccini ML, Hughes GRV. Hughes syndrome, the of cardiac structure and left atrial appendage functions in primary
antiphospholipid syndrome: A new chapter in neurology. Ann N Y antiphospholipid syndrome. Stroke 2005; 36(3): 592–596.
Acad Sci 2005; 1051: 465–486. 33 Owlia MB, Mostafavi Pour Manshadi SMY, Naderi N. Cardiac
11 Gris JC, Brenner B. Neuropsychiatric presentations of antipho- manifestations of rheumatological conditions: a narrative review.
spholipid antibodies. Thromb Res 2013; 39: 935–942. ISRN Rheumatol 2012; 2012: 463620.
12 Lim W. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Hematol Am Soc 34 Koniari I, Siminelakis SN, Baikoussis NG, Papadopoulos G,
Hematol Educ Progr 2009; 2009: 233–239. Goudevenos J, Apostolakis E. Antiphospholipid syndrome; its
13 Panichpisal K, Rozner E, Levine SR. The management of stroke in implication in cardiovascular diseases: a review. J Cardiothorac
antiphospholipid syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2012; 14: 99–106. Surg 2010; 5(1): 101.

Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1412
35 Urbanus RT, Siegerink B, Roest M, Rosendaal FR, de Groot PG, 58 Appenzeller S, Lapa AT, Guirau CR, De Carvalho JF, Shoenfeld
Algra A. Antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of myocardial Y. Cognitive impairment in antiphospholipid syndrome: evidence
infarction and ischaemic stroke in young women in the RATIO from animal models. Clin Rheumatol 2012; 31(3): 403–406.
study: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8(11): 998–1005. 59 Cervera R, Boffa M-C, Khamashta MA, Hughes GRV. The Euro-
36 Amaya-Amaya J, Rojas-Villarraga A, Anaya J-M. Cardiovascular Phospholipid project: epidemiology of the antiphospholipid syn-
disease in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus 2014; 23(12): drome in Europe. Lupus 2009; 18(10): 889–893.
1288–1291. 60 Cavestro C, Micca G, Molinari F, Bazzan M, Di Pietrantonj C,
37 Corban MT, Duarte-Garcia A, McBane RD, Matteson EL, Aloi R, et al. Migraineurs show a high prevalence of antiphospho-
Lerman LO, Lerman A. Antiphospholipid syndrome: role of vas- lipid antibodies. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9(7): 1350–1354.
cular endothelial cells and implications for risk stratification and 61 Noureldine MHA, Haydar AA, Berjawi A, Elnawar R, Sweid A,
targeted therapeutics. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69(18): 2317–2330. Khamashta MA, et al. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) revis-
38 Sherer Y, Shoenfeld Y. Mechanisms of disease: atherosclerosis in ited: would migraine headaches be included in future classification
autoimmune diseases. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2006; 2(2): criteria? Immunol Res 2017; 65(1): 230–241.
99–106. 62 Abreu MM, Danowski A, Wahl DG, Amigo M, Tektonidou M,
39 Shoenfeld Y, Gerli R, Doria A, Matsuura E, Cerinic MM, Ronda Pacheco MS, et al. The relevance of ‘‘non-criteria’’ clinical mani-
N, et al. Accelerated atherosclerosis in autoimmune rheumatic dis- festations of antiphospholipid syndrome: 14th International
eases. Circulation 2005; 112(21): 3337–3347. Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Technical Task Force
40 Andrade D, Bortolotto L, Bonfa E, Borba E. Primary antipho- Report on Antiphospholipid Syndrome Clinical Features.
spholipid syndrome: absence of premature atherosclerosis in Autoimmun Rev 2015; 14: 401–414.
patients without traditional coronary artery disease risk factors. 63 De Carvalho JF, Pasoto SG, Appenzeller S. Seizures in primary
Lupus 2015; 0: 1–7. antiphospholipid syndrome: the relevance of smoking to stroke.
41 Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD, Bushnell CD, Clin Dev Immunol 2012; 2012: 918519.
Cucchiara B, Cushman M, et al. Diagnosis and management of 64 Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Shoenfeld Y, Camps MT, Jacobsen S,
cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare profes- Kiss E, et al. Morbidity and mortality in the antiphospholipid
sionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke syndrome during a 10-year period: a multicentre prospective
Association. Stroke 2011; 42(4): 1158–1192. study of 1000 patients. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68(9): 1428–1432.
42 Martinelli I, Battaglioli T, Pedotti P, Cattaneo M, Mannucci PM. 65 Shoenfeld Y, Lev S, Blatt I, Blank M, Font J, von LP, et al.
Hyperhomocysteinemia in cerebral vein thrombosis. Blood 2003; Features associated with epilepsy in the antiphospholipid syn-
102(4): 1363–1366. drome. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 1344–1348.
43 Christopher R, Nagaraja D, Dixit NS, Narayanan CP. 66 Cimaz R, Meroni PL, Shoenfeld Y. Epilepsy as part of systemic
Anticardiolipin antibodies: a study in cerebral venous thrombosis. lupus erythematosus and systemic antiphospholipid syndrome
Acta Neurol Scand 1999; 99(2): 121–124. (Hughes syndrome). Lupus 2006; 15(4): 191–197.
44 Silvis SM, Sousa DA, De, Ferro JM, Coutinho JM. Cerebral 67 Liou HH, Wang CR, Chou HC, Arvanov VL, Chen RC, Chang
venous thrombosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13(9): 555–565. YC, et al. Anticardiolipin antisera from lupus patients with seiz-
45 Gupta S, Zivadinov R, Ramasamy D, Ambrus JL. Reversible cere-
ures reduce a GABA receptor-mediated chloride current in snail
bral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) in antiphospholipid anti-
neurons. Life Sci 1994; 54(15): 1119–1125.
body syndrome (APLA): the role of centrally acting vasodilators.
68 Chapman J, Soloveichick L, Shavit S, Shoenfeld Y, Korczyn AD.
Case series and review of literature. Clin Rheumatol 2014; 33(12):
Antiphospholipid antibodies bind ATP: a putative mechanism for
1829–1833.
the pathogenesis of neuronal dysfunction. Clin Dev Immunol 2005;
46 Ducros A. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Lancet
12(3): 175–180.
Neurol 2012; 11(10): 906–917.
69 Liimatainen S, Peltola M, Fallah M, Kharazmi E, Haapala AM,
47 Article R, Miller TR, Shivashankar R, Mossa-Basha M, Gandhi
D. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, part 1: epidemi- Peltola J. The high prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in
ology, pathogenesis, and clinical course. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol refractory focal epilepsy is related to recurrent seizures. Eur J
2015; 36(8): 1392–1399. Neurol 2009; 16(1): 134–141.
48 Dutra LA, de Souza AWS, Grinberg-Dias G, Barsottini OGP, 70 Ong M-S, Kohane IS, Cai T, Gorman MP, Mandl KD.
Appenzeller S. Central nervous system vasculitis in adults: an Population-level evidence for an autoimmune etiology of epilepsy.
update. Autoimmun Rev 2017; 16(2): 123–131. JAMA Neurol 2014; 71(5): 569.
49 Wang Z, Fu Z, Wang J, Cui H, Zhang Z, Zhang B. Moyamoya 71 Debourdeau P, Gérome P, Zammit C, Saillol A, Aletti M, Bargues
syndrome with antiphospholipid antibodies: a case report and lit- L, et al. Frequency of anticardiolipin, antinuclear and anti b2GP1
erature review. Lupus 2014; 23(11): 1204–1206. antibodies is not increased in unselected epileptic patients: a case-
50 Scott RM, Smith ER. Moyamoya disease and Moyamoya syn- control study. Seizure 2004; 13(4): 205–207.
drome. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(12): 1226–1237. 72 Chapman J, Rand JH, Brey RL, Levine SR, Blatt I, Khamashta
51 Briley DP, Coull BM, Goodnight SHJ. Neurological disease asso- MA, et al. Non-stroke neurological syndromes associated with
ciated with antiphospholipid antibodies. Ann Neurol 1989; 25(3): antiphospholipid antibodies: evaluation of clinical and experimen-
221–227. tal studies. Lupus 2003; 12(7): 514–517.
52 Wu S, Xu Z, Liang H. Sneddon’s syndrome: a comprehensive 73 Verrot D, San-Marco M, Dravet C, Genton P, Disdier P, Bolla G,
review of the literature. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9(1): 768. et al. Prevalence and signification of antinuclear and anticardioli-
53 Rutter-Locher Z, Chen Z, Flores L, Basu T, Creamer D, Weeks R, pin antibodies in patients with epilepsy. Am J Med 1997; 103(1):
et al. Sneddon’s syndrome: it is all in the ectoderm. Pract Neurol 33–37.
2016; 16(4): 300–303. 74 Peltola JT, Haapala a, Isojärvi JI, Auvinen a, Palmio J, Latvala K,
54 Dutra LA, Braga-Neto P, Pedroso JL, Barsottini OGP. Sneddon’s et al. Antiphospholipid and antinuclear antibodies in patients with
syndrome: case report and review of its relationship with antipho- epilepsy or new-onset seizure disorders. Am J Med 2000; 109(9):
spholipid syndrome. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2012; 10(2): 230–232. 712–717.
55 Brey R, Muscal E, Chapman J. Antiphospholipid antibodies and 75 Fernández-Fernández FJ, Rivera-Gallego A, de la Fuente-Aguado
the brain: a consensus report. Lupus 2011; 20(2): 153–157. J, Pérez-Fernández S, Muñoz-Fernández D. Antiphospholipid syn-
56 Tektonidou MG, Varsou N, Kotoulas G, Antoniou A, drome mimicking multiple sclerosis in two patients. Eur J Intern
Moutsopoulos HM. Cognitive deficits in patients with antipho- Med 2006; 17(7): 500–502.
spholipid syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 2278–2284. 76 Cuadrado MJ, Khamashta MA, Ballesteros A, et al. Can neuro-
57 Chapman J, Abu-Katash M, Inzelberg R, Yust I, Neufeld MY, logic manifestations of Hughes (antiphospholipid) syndrome
Vardinon N, et al. Prevalence and clinical features of dementia be distinguished from multiple sclerosis? Analysis of 27 patients
associated with the antiphospholipid syndrome and circulating and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000; 79(1):
anticoagulants. J Neurol Sci 2002; 203–204: 81–84. 57–68.

Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1413
77 Mayer M, Cerovec M, Radoš M, Čikeš N. Antiphospholipid syn- 96 Provenzale JM, Macik BG, Charles A, Ortel L, Alberts MJ.
drome and central nervous system. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010; Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients without systemic lupus
112(7): 602–608. erythematosus: neuroradiologic findings. Radiology 1994;
78 Heinzlef O, Weill B, Johanet C, Sazdovitch V, Caillat-Zucman S, 192(2): 531–537.
Tournier-Lasserve E, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies in patients 97 Kim JH, Choi CG, Choi SJ, Lee HK, Suh DC. Primary antipho-
with multiple sclerosis do not represent a subgroup of patients spholipid antibody syndrome: neuroradiologic findings in 11
according to clinical, familial, and biological characteristics. patients. Korean J Radiol 2000; 1(1): 5–10.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72(5): 647–649. 98 The and Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Stroke Study Group.
79 Liedorp M, Sanchez E, van Hoogstraten IMW, von Blomberg Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with antiphospholipid
BME, Barkhof F, Polman CH, et al. No evidence of misdiagnosis antibodies and cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1990; 21: 1268–1273.
in patients with multiple sclerosis and repeated positive anticardio- 99 Pereira FR, Macri F, Jackowski MP, Kostis WJ, Gris J, Beregi J,
lipin antibody testing based on magnetic resonance imaging and et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with obstetric antipho-
long term follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78(10): spholipid syndrome without neuropsychiatric symptoms. Eur
1146–1148. Radiol 2016; 26(4): 959–968.
80 Sherer Y, Hassin S, Shoenfeld Y, Levy Y, Livneh A, Ohry A, et al. 100 Hachulla E, Michon-Pasturel U, Leys D, Pruvo JP, Queyrel V,
Transverse myelitis in patients with antiphospholipid antibo- Masy E, et al. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging in patients
dies—the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. Clin with or without antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus 1998; 13(4):
Rheumatol 2002; 21: 207–210. 124–131.
81 Rodrigues CE, de Carvalho JF. Clinical, radiologic, and thera- 101 Ruiz-Irastorza G, Cuadrado M, Ruiz-Arruza I, Brey R, Crowther
peutic analysis of 14 patients with transverse myelitis associated M, Derksen R, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the
with antiphospholipid syndrome: report of 4 cases and review of prevention and long-term management of thrombosis in antipho-
the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011; 40: 349–357. spholipid antibody-positive patients: report of a Task Force at the
82 Campi A, Filippi M, Comi G, Scotti G. Recurrent acute transverse 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies.
myelopathy associated with anticardiolipin antibodies. Am J Lupus 2011; 20(2): 206–218.
Neuroradiol 1998; 19(4): 781–786. 102 Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz
83 Lennon PVA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti MI, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke
CF, Fujihara K, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromye- in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2014;
litis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004; 45(7): 2160–2236.
364(9451): 2106–2112. 103 Yelnik CM, Appenzeller S, Sanna G, Kozora E, Bertolaccini ML.
84 Iyer A, Elsone L, Appleton R, Jacob A. A review of the current Neuropsychiatric manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome.
literature and a guide to the early diagnosis of autoimmune dis- In: Erkan D, Lockshin M (eds), Antiphospholipid Syndrome.
Cham: Springer, 2017. pp. 201–219.
orders associated with neuromyelitis optica. Autoimmunity 2014;
104 Rosa RF, Ugolini-Lopes MR, Zeinad-Valim AK, D’Amico E,
47(3): 154–161.
Andrade D. Difficult clinical situations in the antiphospholipid
85 Suvajac G, Stojanovich L, Milenkovich S. Ocular manifestations
syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2015; 17(4): 29.
in antiphospholipid syndrome. Autoimmun Rev 2007; 6(6):
105 Nalli C, Andreoli L, Casu C, Tincani A. Management of recur-
409–414.
rent thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome. Curr Rheumatol
86 Giorgi D, Balacco Gabrieli C. Optic neuropathy in systemic lupus
Rep 2014; 16(3): 405.
erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS): clinical fea-
106 Tenti S, Cheleschi S, Guidelli GM, Galeazzi M, Fioravanti A.
tures, pathogenesis, review of the literature and proposed ophthal-
Intravenous immunoglobulins and antiphospholipid syndrome:
mological criteria for APS diagnosis. Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18(2): how, when and why? A review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev
124–131. 2016; 15(3): 226–235.
87 Vaphiades MS, Brock W, Brown HH, Petursson G, Westfall CT. 107 Joshi A, Hong J, Siva C. Recurrent thrombosis in patients with
Catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome manifesting as antiphospholipid syndrome receiving newer oral anticoagulants: a
an orbital ischemic syndrome. J Neuroophthalmol 2001; 21(4): case report and review of literature. Clin Med Res 2017; 15(1–2):
260–263. 41–44.
88 Gris J, Cyprien F, Bouvier S, Cochery-Nouvellon E, Lavigne- 108 Cohen H, Hunt BJ, Efthymiou M, Arachchillage DRJ, Mackie IJ,
Lissalde G, Mercier E, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies are asso- Clawson S, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin to treat patients
ciated with positive screening for common mental disorders in with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without sys-
women with previous pregnancy loss. The NOHA-PSY observa- temic lupus erythematosus (RAPS): a randomised, controlled,
tional study. World J Biol Psychiatry 2017; 19: 1–13. open-label, phase 2/3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Haematol
89 Etemadifar M, Dehghani L, Tahani S, Toghianifar N, Rahaimi M, 2016; 3(9): 426–436.
Eskandari N. Neurological manifestations in patients with anti- 109 Erkan D, Aguiar CL, Andrade D, Cohen H, Cuadrado MJ,
phospholipid syndrome. Iran J Neurol 2013; 12(4): 172–175. Danowski A, et al. 14th International Congress on
90 Appenzeller S, Yeh S, Maruyama M, Barros SM, De Carvalho JF. Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force Report on
Chorea in primary antiphospholipid syndrome is associated with Antiphospholipid Syndrome Treatment Trends. Autoimmun Rev
rheumatic fever. Rheumatol Int 2012; 32(9): 2857–2861. 2014; 13(6): 685–696.
91 Orzechowski NM, Wolanskyj AP, Ahlskog JE, Kumar N, Moder 110 Pengo V, Banzato A, Bison E, Zoppellaro G, Padayattil Jose S,
KG. Antiphospholipid antibody-associated chorea. J Rheumatol Denas G. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-
2008; 35(11): 2165–2170. risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: rationale and
92 Martino D, Chew NK, Mir P, Edwards MJ, Quinn NP, Bhatia KP. design of the Trial on Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid
Atypical movement disorders in antiphospholipid syndrome. Mov Syndrome (TRAPS) trial. Lupus 2016; 25: 301–306.
Disord 2006; 21(7): 944–949. 111 Woller SC, Stevens SM, Kaplan DA, Branch DW, Aston VT,
93 Reitblat T, Polishchuk I, Dorodnikov E, Aladjem Z, Turiansky L, Wilson EL, et al. Apixaban for the secondary prevention of
Zamir D, et al. Primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome mas- thrombosis among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.
querading as progressive supranuclear palsy. Lupus 2003; 12(1): Clin Appl Thromb 2016; 22(3): 239–247.
67–69. 112 Belizna C. Hydroxychloroquine as an anti-thrombotic in antipho-
94 Huang Y-C, Lyu R-K, Chen S-T, Chu Y-C, Wu Y-R. spholipid syndrome. Autoimmun Rev 2015; 14(4): 358–362.
Parkinsonism in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome—case 113 Andrade D, Tektonidou M. Emerging therapies in antiphospho-
report and literature review. J Neurol Sci 2008; 267(1–2): 166–169. lipid syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2016; 18(4): 1–9.
95 Rovaris M, Pedroso C, Filippi M. Neuroimaging techniques in the 114 Erkan D, Willis R, Murthy VL, Basra G, Vega J, Ruiz-Limón P,
diagnostic work-up of patients with the antiphospholipid syn- et al. A prospective open-label pilot study of fluvastatin on proin-
drome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2001; 3(4): 301–306. flammatory and prothrombotic biomarkers in antiphospholipid

Lupus
Neurologic manifestations of APS
IF Ricarte et al.
1414
antibody positive patients. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73(6): 118 Lai JY, Wu PC, Chen HC, Lee MB. Early neuropsychiatric
1176–1180. involvement in antiphospholipid syndrome. Gen Hosp
115 Cuadrado MJ, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Sticky blood and Psychiatry 2012; 34(5): 579.
headache. Lupus 2001; 10: 392–393. 119 Brogna C, Mariotti P, Manna R. Conventional and intravenous
116 Asherson RA, Giampaulo D, Singh S, Sulman L. Dramatic immunoglobulin therapy in paediatric antiphospholipid antibo-
response of severe headaches to anticoagulation in a patient dies-related chorea. Lupus 2014; 23(14): 1449–1451.
with antiphospholipid syndrome. JCR J Clin Rheumatol 2007; 120 Erkan D, Vega J, Ramón G, Kozora E, Lockshin MD. A pilot
13(3): 173–174. open-label phase II trial of rituximab for non-criteria manifest-
117 Van Roie E, Labarque V, Renard M, Van Geet C, Gabriëls L. ations of antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2013;
Obsessive-compulsive behavior as presenting symptom of primary 65(2): 464–471.
antiphospholipid syndrome. Psychosom Med 2013; 75(3):
326–330.

Lupus

Вам также может понравиться