Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2. Two African-American athletes, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, won the gold and bronze medal
respectively in the 200 mt. race. For the medal ceremony, both of them wore no shoes and stood in their
black socks. They were representing Black poverty, and racial discrimination against them in the USA.
They also raised black-gloved clenched fists to symbolise Black Power. The athlete from Australia, Peter
Norman, who won the silver medal, wore a human rights badge to declare his support to the two
Americans.
3. Do you know what was the result of their actions? The Olympic Committee took back their medals for
making a political statement and thus violating the Olympic spirit.
5. Peter Norman was also penalised by not being included in the next Olympic.
6. Martin Luther King started a movement called Civil Rights Movement in the USA (1954-1968) to
abolish legal racial discrimination against the African Americans. They used a non-violent approach and
used civil disobedience as a method against discrimination.
7. Another movement, which started in 1966 and lasted till 1975, was called The Black Power movement.
It was a militant movement and even advocated violence to end racism in USA.
This incident shows how people respond to social divisions and inequalities
Social divisions can be based on regional differences (as in Belgium and Sri Lanka — different
languages spoken in different regions).
They can be based on different religions (Sri Lanka)
They can be based on racial discrimination (USA, South Africa)
Social divisions can lead to social inequalities.
Two kinds of social divisions : (i) Based on accident of birth, (ii) Based on people's choices.
All social differences do not result in social divisions. Some can unite people also.
(i) Most of the social differences are not of our own making, they are based on an accident of birth. Our
race, our colour, our religion, our gender or country of birth, are not chosen by us.
(ii) But some social differences are made by us only by choice. For example –
(i) Non-belief in God, or to follow a different religion, (ii) where and what to study, (iii) which profession
to follow (iv) also choose the games or cultural activities we want to follow, etc.
Our choices lead to the formation of social groups.
(iii) It is not necessary that all social differences should lead to social divisions. People belonging to
different social groups share differences and similarities, which cut across all political boundaries.
Important : If religion creates similarities, it can divide people over the issue of caste or sect (Catholic or
Protestant, Brahmin or Scheduled Caste).
1. Rich and poor persons in the same family differ from each other and lack closeness to each other, for
they feel they are different.
2. The above is an example of one difference overlapping other differences, people of the same religion
feel they belong to different communities.
3. Take another example : In Ireland, a Christian country, the division is because of religion between the
Protestants and Catholics.
In Northern Ireland, if you are a Catholic you are bound to be poor and you may have been discriminated
against. There have been conflicts between the two.
CROSS-CUTTING DIFFERENCES
1. In Netherlands : Catholics and Protestants both can be either rich or poor, with the result they
have never had any trouble. Unlike Ireland, there has never been any trouble in the Netherlands.
There reason class and religion cut across each other.
2. Which kind of division is more dangerous?
3. Overlapping social differences. They can create deep social divisions. Examples : (i) Led to
ethnic war in Sri Lanka which has not yet ended.
(ii) Led to the Partition of India in 1947.
4. Cross-cutting social differences are easier to handle and accommodate.
5. It is important to note here that social divisions of one kind or another exist in every country. No
country, big or small, has a homogeneous society, i.e., a society with similar kind of people and
hardly any ethnic differences.
6. There is another reason — People from one region or country shift to another region or country
(both within a country and another country) to seek better economic opportunities.
These migrants create social differences and divisions.
Leads to violence
conflicts and Turns them into Competition divides
disintegration political division society
RANGE OF OUTCOMES
Final Outcome : A peace treaty signed in 1998 which ended the armed struggle.
2. Yugoslavia also faced ethno-religious differences. They led to political competition. Civil war followed
and Yugoslavia has been broken up now into seven independent nations, namely;\ Bosnia, Macedonia
Croatia, Herzegovina, Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro. Conclusion : Social divisions should not be
allowed to influence the politics of a country. We have seen the result in our own country — Partition into
India and Pakistan. In a democracy, how do social divisions affect the people?
(iv) Voting is affected in most countries. People from one community prefer some parties more than the
others.
(v) In some countries, there are parties that focus on one community only.
Factors that decide the outcomes of social divisions
Feminist Movements: Various movements which are aimed at ensuring equal rights for women
are called feminist movement.
Political expression of gender question helped a lot to improve women’s role in public life.
Although the Indian society is still a patriarchal society, yet women are now working in many
fields.
The literacy rate among women is only 54 per cent compared with 76 per cent among
men.
The percentage of women in highly paid jobs is still very small. At many workplaces,
women are paid less than men for the same job. An Indian woman usually works more
hour than an average man on a daily basis.
Many Indian parents prefer to have a male child. A girl child is killed before her birth in
many cases. This has led to an eschewed sex ratio in India.
There are many reports of harassment against women; both on the domestic front and
outside the home.
One-third of seats in local government bodies have been reserved for women candidates. This
has helped in increasing women’s representation in panchayats and municipalities.
A bill for providing one-third reservation in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies has been
pending in the Parliament for more than a decade. Political parties are yet to arrive at consensus
on this issue.
Communalism: When one religion is pitted against another; by the political class, this is called
communalism or communal politics.
Many people think of their religion as superior to all other religions. Such people often
try to dominate the people from other communities. This can result in people from the
minority community to form a separate political unit.
Sometimes, sacred symbols, religious leaders, emotional appeal, etc. are used to instill a
sense of fear among people of a particular community. This is done with an attempt to
polarize people on communal lines.
Communalism can also take the ugly form of communal violence, riots and massacre.
Secular state
The Constitution of India declares that India is a secular state. Unlike some of the
neighbouring countries, there is no official religion for the Indian state.
The constitution gives the people the freedom to practice a religion of their choice. The
Constitution prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion.
The Indian constitution, however, allows the state to intervene in the matters of religion
whenever there is a need to ensure equality within religious communities.
Caste in Politics
When parties choose candidates in elections, they keep in mind the caste composition of the electorate
and nominate candidates from different castes so as to muster necessary support to win elections. When
governments are formed, political parties usually take care that representatives of different castes and
tribes find a place in it.
Political parties and candidates in elections make appeals to caste sentiment to muster support. Some
political parties are known to favour some castes and are seen as their representatives.
Universal adult franchise and the principle of one-person-one-vote compelled political leaders to gear
upto the task of mobilising and securing political support. It also brought new consciousness among the
people of castes that were hitherto treated as inferior and low.
The focus on caste in politics can sometimes give an impression that elections are all about caste and
nothing else. That is far from true. Just consider these:
No parliamentary constituency in the country has a clear majority of one single caste. So, every candidate
and party needs to win the confidence of more than one caste and community to win elections.
No party wins the votes of all the voters of a caste or community. When people say that a caste is a ‘vote
bank’ of one party, it usually means that a large proportion of the voters from that caste vote for that
party.
Many political parties may put up candidates from the same caste (if that caste is believed to dominate the
electorate in a particular constituency).Some voters have more than one candidate from their caste while
many voters have no candidate from their caste.
The ruling party and the sitting MP or MLA frequently lose elections in our country. That could not have
happened if all castes and communities were frozen in their political preferences
Politics in caste
Most of the political parties keep the caste calculation in mind while fielding a candidate
from a particular constituency.
Each caste group is trying to get a bigger pie of the political power by asserting its
identity in various ways.
Since there are so many castes, hence various caste groups have also evolved their own
coalition to get leverage in political bargaining.
The caste groups can be broadly divided into ‘backward’ and ‘forward’.
Exclusive attention to caste can produce negative results. Caste divisions often lead to
social conflict and even violence.