Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
70
The Government of India has made various organizational set up
for agricultural marketing such as Office of the Agricultural Marketing
Advisor, to the Government of India, Directorate of Marketing and
Inspections, State and Central Warehousing Corporations, and
regulated markets etc. for the protection of farmers from the hands of
traders and need for the provision of better marketing facilities, basic
infrastructure and the like.
The Law provided for the notification of markets and their control
by representative committees. Under the provision of this Act,
(1) Standard weights alone were permitted to be used, 2) Deduction of
unlawful allowances were prohibited, (3) Penalties and fines were
imposed on erring traders, (4) Brokers and weigh man were to be
licensed.
In spite of a few major defects, this Act proved very helpful to the
cowers of cotton. In short the Bearer markets speeded the idea of
-egulated markets throughout the country.
71
replaced the Bearer Act by passing "Bombay cotton Markets Act", 1927,
in pursuance of the recommendation made by market committee. This
Act was definitely an improvement over the Bearer Law. A real progress
in the direction of the establishment of regulated market was, however,
noticed after the publication of the "Report of Royal commission on
Agriculture 1928". After that most of the Government passed legislation
almost on similar lines for the organization of regulated markets.
During the third and Fourth Five Year Plans periods, legislations
for establishment of Regulated Market was a force in all state, viz.,
Assam, Kerala, Jammu and Kashmir etc., also enacted the legislation.
Thus the number of Regulated market increased rapidly.
• No underhand dealing.
• Regulated "Marketing Committee".
• Settlement of dispute through "Arbitration Committee".
• License holders only can enter into trade within market yard.
• Ensures fair prices to the farmers.
• Choice of good quality.
• Facilities to buy required quantities.
• Eliminates intermediaries, brokers, and commission agents.
• Facilities for grading and storage.
• Readily available market information.
• Free services to farmers.
72
In India, shandies, chuna, hat, painth, bazaar, mandi, gungs,
fairs, regulated markets, co-operative marketing, uzhavar sandhai, and
state trading are the existing facilities to the farmers to market their
produces. However, such system of marketing lack efficiency and are
inelastic to the hard luck of farmers who are exploited by the
middlemen. Hence, in order to reduce marketing charges, ensure fair
prices to farmers and to do away with exploitative marketing practices
the regulated markets were setup.
73
3.4. ROLE OF REGULATED MARKETS IN AGRICULTURE
DEVELOPMENT
74
3.5. ROLE IN DEVELOPMENT
75
3.5.2. Development of rural markets
77
12 per cent for the next 90 days. The scheme is a new beginning and
its success can be judged after a few years.
78
yet reached the proper persons. The efforts are good enough, but there
is a need to intensify them.
IN INDIA
Table 3.1
2007-08
80
production. The sector is estimated to have grown at the rate of 7.5 per
cent at constant prices over the previous year.
Table 3.2
Y=-3.E+07 +12731.3X
The trend analysis revealed that the growth rate is 51.80 and the
trend of production is rapidly increasing in agriculture production. In
the span of 10 years the agriculturists increased their production
capacity and contributed significantly to Indian economy.
81
Graph - 3.a
25 -
20 -
—0— Production
15 - at current
prices
—a-- Production
at constant
10 - prices
o
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
82
possess the great potential of this sector in boosting the over-all
exports.
Share of Agriculture
Agriculture
Year All India in All India
Sector
(in per cent)
83
It shows that export growth of agriculture sector has increased
from 31.5 per cent to 34.4 per cent from 1997-2008. The correlation
analysis is applied on the variables all India export and agriculture
contribution. The Karl Pearson's co-efficient of correlation is r=0.999
and it shows that the contribution of agriculture production to export
performance is highly significant in the years from 1997-2008.
Graph 3.b
350000
300000 -
--a— Agriculture
Sector
200000 -
150000
100000
50000
1 T -
A CS cb 0 ft, C3 Co
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0A 0
cb
c§cr
N`b N`b
cY5 cbc5 'g
Nc5
\' 0q; 0°5 01)(
ri5) ri,̀)
36
(19'
e,
84
3.8. EMPLOYMENT POTENTIAL
Employment generation has always been one of the main
objectives of the policies aimed at economic development and growth of
the nation. A rise in economic growth has always led to increased
employment opportunities and similarly enhanced employment
generation has always contributed significantly towards economic
growth. However, identifying and creating employment opportunities
has always been a challenging task in our country, the reasons for
which are plenty and well known. More disturbing in this contest is
the realization that there has not been commensurate growth in
employment vis-a-vis economic growth as demonstrated by the GDP
indicators over the past decade. The general impression that the
acceleration in growth experienced during mid-90s would create
sufficient employment capable of absorbing increased labour force and
reduce the backlog of employment has not proved fully correct.
From the NSS survey results in 2000 it emerges that during the
six year period between 1993-94 and 1999-2000, the rate of growth of
employment was just above 1 per cent in rural agricultural areas; this
is less than half of what could have occurred, has the earlier targeted
elasticity of employment of 0.4 would have fructified. The NSS data
indicated a significant lowering of labour force participation rates
mainly among younger age groups and rural women. During the Tenth
Five Year Plan, the agriculture sector has been assigned a target of
creating 4.4 million additional jobs. During the Ninth Plan, the sector
achieved the target. However, during the Tenth Plan some disturbing
factors have been noticed. These are decline in labour intensity of rural
agriculture and decline in flow of credit as percentage of net bank credit
from 17.5 per cent in 1998 to 11 per cent in 2008.
fl
0 Employment
in lakhs
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
87
through agriculture marketing increases significantly. It is observed
that the increase ranges from 3.4 per cent to 4.9 per cent. Employment
is estimated to have increased to 273.97 lakhs persons in 2007-08
from 261.38 lakhs persons in the year 2006-2007.
Table 3.5
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
Y=-17825 +9.0289X
88
Table 3.6
89
Graph 3.d
6
GDP growth
5- per annum
4-
-4:
3- Agriculture
sector growth
3- per annum
2-
0
Cb
C3 QPN C9/ (t) C§)
c) t■i
b
P\°
cbc3 #6) 0
(V
(3 C9
10 tie ge
OC
tie
6) CP
fie le
90
organized and unorganized setup. Besides, the third layer consisting of
sub-systems namely legal and administration frame works, finance and
credit policies and the institutions, warehousing in private and public
sector and transport agencies from the external layer of the agricultural
marketing systems. The outer layer comprises of the consumers at
large. The sub-systems of the agricultural marketing system are
capable of bringing in significant influence upon the functions and
operations of other sub-systems and thereby in the entire system itself.
The agricultural marketing system is built around farmer - producers,
the inner layer enveloped by other sub-systems in the other layers.
92
grading centre are functioning in the State. Further rest rooms, toilets,
canteens, cattle shed, vehicle parks, cash counter were also provided in
the markets to make it comfortable to all the farmers and traders to
carry out their marketing activities smoothly. However, all the facilities
are not available in all the regulated markets.
MARKETING IN TAMILNADU
93
Table 3.7
1998-99 214568
1999-00 247890
2000-01 269874
2001-02 295004
2002-03 324627
2003-04 354939
2004-05 387597
2005-06 419524
2006-07 448905
2007-08 474699
94
Graph 3.e
500000 -
450000 -
400000 -
350000
300000 -
250000 D Registered]
200000 -
150000 -
100000 -
50000
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
95
Table 3.8
1998-99 3954.12
1999-00 4954.00
2000-01 6574.11
2001-02 7966.00
2002-03 9350.00
2003-04 10623.00
2004-05 11567.22
2005-06 12166.19
2006-07 12569.34
2007-08 13291.50
96
Graph 3.f
14000
12000
10000
8000 -
0 Investments]
6000
4000
2000
0
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
97
opportunities to reduce unemployment problem in the state. The
employment of farmers in Tamil Nadu for the period of 10 years given
in table 3.9.
Table 3.9
1998-99 1745896
1999-00 1875946
2000-01 2014789
2001-02 2250900
2002-03 2451000
2003-04 2667200
2004-05 2902122
2005-06 3142335
2006-07 3142335
2007-08 3417832
98
Graph 3.g
4000000 ,
3500000 -
3000000 -
2500000
2000000 -
0 Employment
1500000 -
1000000
500000 -
0-
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
99
58.20 per cent of them are engaged in agriculture i.e., they are directly
involved in agriculture production. It provides employment indirectly to
many people. In Tarnilnadu also more than 50 per cent of people
engaged in agricultural and they are directly involved in agricultural
production. The details of production of agriculture produces in
Tamilnadu are shown in the table 3.10.
Table 3.10
1998-99 22368.00
1999-00 30541.01
2000-01 39688.57
2001-02 48675.00
2002-03 58432.00
2003-04 70987.00
2004-05 78261.66
2005-06 83904.80
2006-07 89781.00
2007-08 94939.80
100
Graph 3.h
100000 1
90000 -
80000 -
70000
60000
50000 O Production
(in crores)
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
101
Chillies, Cashew nut, Tealeaf, Coffee, Silk, and Cotton textiles, Spices
like Cardamom, Cinnamon, Pepper and the recent addition of
Horticulture produces and Herbs are the array of agricultural produces
having better export potential.
Table 3.11
102
Graph 3.i
300000
250000 -
200000 -
100000 -
50000 -
0
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
103
on the years and export performance for 10 years and it is found that
r=0.994, this shows that the export through agricultural marketing in
Tamilnadu is significantly contributing to all India performance.
104
district six are operating from their own buildings, rests of them
function in rental buildings.
1 Att-ur 01.08.1979
2 Salem 02.08.1979
3 Konganapuram 06.08.1979
4 Kolathur 10.09.1979
5 Thalaivasal 11.01.1980
6 Thammampatty 01.09.1980
7 Metchari 03.09.1980
8 Valapadi 01.11.1980
9 Omalur 01.04.1983
10 Kadayampatty 30.04.1983
11 Gangavalli 15.07.1983
12 Karumanthurai 30.08.1986
13 Solakkadu 01.04.1988
105
Department of Agriculture, Government of Tamil Nadu in the cadre of
Assistant Director of Agriculture, alternatively from the Department of
Agriculture and from the Directorate of Agricultural Marketing and Agri
business, so as to maintain 1:1 between the two. The terms of office of
the secretary are three years. Four official members, not below the rank
of Assistant Director from the Departments of Fisheries, Horticulture,
Agriculture, Sericulture and Co-operation are nominated by the
Government of Tamil Nadu. Four members from among the traders,
who are holding licence, are nominated by the Market Committee. Eight
members from among the farmers are elected at the rate of three from
marginal farmers, three from small farmers and 2 from other farmers in
order to have representation for different types of farmers. The elected
body is entrusted with the task of framing policies and implementing.
Programmes are subject to Government direction. In the absence of
elected body, a Special Officer takes charge of all affairs. Nomination to
the post of secretary to the Market Committee is done on a rotation
basis, alternatively for one term the secretary is nominated from the
Department of Agriculture and for the next term, such nomination is
from the Directorate of Agriculture Marketing and Agriculture
Business. The Market Committee has to meet atleast once in three
months to discuss, deliberate, and decide affairs of the Regulated
Markets (exhibit in the following Chart).
106
Organizational Chart
107
3.17.3. Staff Structure of Market Committee
Chairman 1
Secretary 1
Superintendent
Supervisor 1
Senior Assistants
Junior Assistants 5
Typist 1
Record Clerk 1
Drivers 2
Office Assistants 3
Watchmen 2
108
There is an Inspector of License (premises) who scrutinizes the
premises of the applicants and their books of accounts and endorses
them by putting his signature if the turnover is between Rs. 10 lakhs to
Rs. 25 lakhs and recommends for endorsement by the secretary if the
turnover is over Rs. 25 lakhs. Such scrutiny enables them to verify the
renewal status of licence and instruct renewal for un-renewed ones and
report to the secretary. In a Market Committee, which accords licence
to traders; one superintendent who takes care of publicity and
propaganda and also supervision over the others regulated markets
under the control of Market Committee, a Supervisor, two Senior
Assistants, five Junior Assistants, one Typist, one Record Clerk, two
Drivers, three Office Assistants and two Watchmen are on the staff roll
of the Market Committee.
109
Listed Farm Produces that arrived at Salem Regulated Markets
1 Paddy V V --
2 Sorgham V V --
3 Millet V V --
4 Ragi V V --
5 Jaggery i V --
6 Cotton V V --
7 Groundnut V V --
8 Gingelly seed V V --
9 Caster seed I -- V
10 Tamarind V V --
11 Chilly V V --
12 Topioca V V --
13 Turmeric V V --
14 Coconut V V --
15 Red gram I -- V
16 Black gram V V --
17 Green gram V V --
110
3.18. ROLE OF REGULATED MARKET IN AGRICULTURE
MARKETING
The growth of agriculture sectors in the span of 10 years in
Salem districts has seen remarkable changes and profound
developments. The state government has employed many strategies to
revive the developmental approaches as noticed in 1980s. The existing
scenario in the district is encouraging and noticed a milestone in the
year 2004-05. This chapter explores the growth of Salem districts in
terms of number of units, investment, production, and employment
potential and exports performance and it also analyses the contribution
of performance farmers and regulated markets in Salem district on
Tamilnadu level.
111
Table 3.12
REGISTERED FARMERS IN SALEM DISTRICT
Year Registered Farmers (units)
1998-99 24508
1999-00 27821
2000-01 30494
2001-02 32846
2002-03 35090
2003-04 38168
2004-05 40094
2005-06 43664
2006-07 47102
2007-08 49568
112
Graph 3.j
60000
50000
40000
30000 o Registered
Farmersunit
20000 ■
10000
1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007-
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
113
The linear regression is employed to establish the relationship
between time and number of farmers in Salem district with the
equation
Y= (-5.E+06)+ 2734.42X
Table 3.13
114
Graph 3.k
160000
140000 -
120000 -
100000
80000 -
Registered
Farmers
60000 - -AB-- Investments (in
Lakhs)
Per capita
40000 - Investment
20000 -
115
The per capita investment of Salem revealed that the maximum
investment is found in the agricultural sector in the year 1999-2000,
which worked out to 3.05 lakhs and unenthusiastic investment is
found in the year 1998-99 with 2.03 lakhs. But in the span of ten years
the investment amount increased by 1.02 lakhs.
Y=(-2.E+07) + 8984.69 X
116
Table 3.14
117
Graph 3.1
700000
600000 -
500000 -
200000 -
100000 -
0 1
c) 5)0 0
cb 0 5)cb o 5) o
Ne 1 (0,,e
118
implies that the employment opportunities through agriculture in
Salem district is significantly increasing.
The above table also reveals that the per capita employment of
agriculture in Salem district is showing the declining trend from 1998-
2008 continuously. This shows the heavy competition in agriculture in
Salem district. The rate at which the labour gets into a unit slightly
increased from 0.5 to 0.7. This implies the urgent requirement of
labours for the agriculture.
Y= (-2.E+07) + 12724.9 X
119
Table 3.15
120
analysis is applied on the years and production for 10 years and it is
found that r =0.998. This shows that the production through
agriculture in Salem district is significantly increasing.
Y= (-1.E+08) + 55247.7
121
Table 3.16
EXPORT VALUES OF AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN SALEM DISTRICT
1998-99 35468.28
1999-00 40128.23
2000-01 45897.21
2001-02 48975.32
2002-03 52147.08
2003-04 55487.25
2004-05 59648.69
2005-06 64417.74
2006-07 68458.10
2007-08 71489.21
122
gshows that the export performance through agriculture in Salem
district is significantly increasing.
Graph 3.m
1200000
1000000
800000
No of units
600000 -
Production (in
Lakhs)
Per capita
production
400000
200000 -
0
C5 N rb (0 co A ct)
cb Q,
Ob
'\ \c' (19 (15) r1.9 (19 (19 r19 c19 r19
Y= (-8.E+06)+3942.18 X
123
district at five percent level of significance. The estimated growth is
86.89 percent.
Table 3.17
CORRELATIONS
Investment Pearson
1 0.964(**) 0.972(**) 0.962(**) 0.973(**)
Correlation
Sig. (2-
. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
tailed)
N 10 10 10 10 10
Units Pearson
0.964(**) 1 0.990(**) 0.999(**) 0.998(**)
Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.000 . 0.000 0.000 0.000
tailed)
N 10 10 10 10 10
Employment Pearson
0.972(**) 0.990(**) 1 0.991(**) 0.991(**)
Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.000 0.000 . 0.000 0.000
tailed)
N 10 10 10 10 10
Production Pearson
0.962(**) 0.999(**) 0.991(**) 1 0.996(**)
Correlation
124
Sig. (2-
0.000 0.000 0.000 . 0.000
tailed)
N 10 10 10 10 10
Export Pearson
0.973(**) 0.998(**) 0.991(**) 0.996(**) 1
Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -
tailed)
N 10 10 10 10 10
125
Table 3.18
MODEL SUMMARY
Table 3.19
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
Mean Square
Model
4. 44
mi
CO
Total 252722167910.10 9 -- -- --
126
Table 3.20
COEFFICIENTS
Standardized
Model Unstandardized Coefficients t Sig.
Coefficients
Er.X.032001
127