Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
■ Marketing: Once the XC-750 is operating next year, the extra capacity is expected
continue for the ten-year life of the machine.
■
Operations: The disruption caused by the installation will decrease sales by $5 m
goods for the products produced by the XC-750 is expected to be 70% of their sal
inventory on hand of $1 million during the life of the project.
■ Human Resources: The expansion will require additional sales and administrative
■
Accounting: The XC-750 will be depreciated via the straight-line method over the
the new sales to be 15% of revenues and payables to be 10% of the cost of goods
a. Determine the incremental earnings from the purchase of the XC-750.
b. Determine the free cash flow from the purchase of the XC-750.
c. If the appropriate cost of capital for the expansion is 10%, compute the NPV of th
d. While the expected new sales will be $10 million per year from the expansion, es
the worst case? In the best case?
e. What is the break-even level of new sales from the expansion? What is the break-
f. Billingham could instead purchase the XC-900, which offers even greater capacit
not be useful in the first two years of operation, but would allow for additional sa
million expected for the XC-750) per year in those years would justify purchasing
on capacity by purchasing a new machine, the XC-750. The cost of the XC-750 is $2.75
eral months and will partially disrupt production. The firm has just completed a $50,000
resulting in the following estimates:
extra capacity is expected to generate $10 million per year in additional sales, which will
l decrease sales by $5 million this year. As with Billingham’s existing products, the cost of
ted to be 70% of their sale price. The increased production will also require increased
ject.
sales and administrative personnel at a cost of $2 million per year.
ight-line method over the ten-year life of the machine. The firm expects receivables from
10% of the cost of goods sold. Billingham’s marginal corporate tax rate is 35%.
the XC-750.
C-750.
%, compute the NPV of the purchase.
r from the expansion, estimates range from $8 million to $12 million. What is the NPV in
nsion? What is the break-even level for the cost of goods sold?
fers even greater capacity. The cost of the XC-900 is $4 million. The extra capacity would
d allow for additional sales in years 3–10. What level of additional sales (above the $10
would justify purchasing the larger machine?
Tax rate 35.0%
Cost of goods as a % of sales 70.0% input here
First year sales value 10,000.00
0 0 0 0 0 0
774 774 774 774 774 774
0 1,000 811
774 1,774 811
1,521 1,521 0
(710) (710) 0
1,000 0 0
1,811 811 0
Tax rate 35.0%
Cost of goods as a % of sales 69.5% this input driven by cell c33
First year sales value 10,000.00
0 0 0 0 0 0
776 776 776 776 776 776
0 1,000 805
776 1,776 805
1,500 1,500 0
(695) (695) 0
1,000 0 0
1,805 805 0
Tax rate 35.0%
Cost of goods as a % of sales 70.0%
First year sales value 10,142.69 this input driven by cell c35
0 0 0 0 0 0
774 774 774 774 774 774
0 1,000 811
774 1,774 811
1,521 1,521 0
(710) (710) 0
1,000 0 0
1,811 811 0
Tax rate 35.0%
Cost of goods as a % of 70.0% This value is calculated using
First year sales value 10,000 set NPV = 0 (cell C 20) by cha
c29. The remaining values wil
0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000
1,060 1,060 1,060 1,060 1,060 1,060 2,060
0
0
0
0
911
911
0
0
0
0