Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The total number of hate crime events, offenses, victims, and suspects all increased in 2017. The
following statements highlight the major trends in Hate Crime in California for 2017.
Crime Data
Hate crime events increased 17.4 percent from 931 in 2016 to 1,093 in 2017. (Table 11)
The number of victims of reported hate crimes increased 10.9 percent from 1,145 in 2016 to 1,270 in
2017. (Table 15)
The number of suspects of reported hate crimes increased 3.2 percent from 982 in 2016 to 1,013 in
2017. (Table 15)
Hate crime events involving a racial bias increased 16 percent from 519 in 2016 to 602 in 2017.
(Table 11)
• Anti-black or African American bias events rose from 251 in 2016 to 302 in 2017, an increase of
20.3 percent.
• Anti-Hispanic or Latino bias events rose from 83 in 2016 to 126 in 2017, an increase of 51.8 percent.
Hate crime events involving a religion bias increased 21.1 percent from 171 in 2016 to 207 in 2017.
(Table 11)
• Anti-Jewish bias events rose from 82 in 2016 to 104 in 2017, an increase of 26.8 percent.
• Anti-Islamic (Muslim) bias events rose from 37 in 2016 to 46 in 2017.
Hate crime events involving a sexual orientation bias increased 18.8 percent from 207 in 2016 to 246 in
2017. (Table 11)
• Anti-gay (male) bias events rose from 152 in 2016 to 172 in 2017, an increase of 13.2 percent.
Hate crime offenses increased 10.5 percent from 1,190 in 2016 to 1,315 in 2017. (Table 12)
• Violent crime offenses increased 12.1 percent from 767 in 2016 to 860 in 2017. (Table 13)
• Property crime offenses increased 8.2 percent from 417 in 2016 to 451 in 2017. (Table 13)
1
The term event is defined as an occurrence when a hate crime is involved. (In this report, the information about the event is a crime report or source document that
meets the criteria for a hate crime.) There may be one or more suspects involved, one or more victims targeted, and one or more offenses involved for each event.
2
The term offense is defined as criminal acts that are recorded as follows: murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft,
arson, simple assault, intimidation, and destruction/vandalism as defined in the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) and the national Hate Crimes Statistics Report.
APPENDICES
Appendix 2 Glossary......................................................................................................................................................... 33
Single-bias total............................................... 1,092 99.9 1,311 99.7 1,268 99.8 1,013 100.0
Race/ethnicity/national origin.......................... 602 55.1 100.0 742 56.4 100.0 715 56.3 100.0 568 56.1 100.0
Anti-white.................................................... 47 4.3 7.8 54 4.1 7.3 52 4.1 7.3 51 5.0 9.0
Anti-black or African American.................... 302 27.6 50.2 363 27.6 48.9 346 27.2 48.4 264 26.1 46.5
Anti-Hispanic or Latino................................ 126 11.5 20.9 159 12.1 21.4 157 12.4 22.0 162 16.0 28.5
Anti-American Indian/
Alaskan native.......................................... 5 0.5 0.8 6 0.5 0.8 6 0.5 0.8 5 0.5 0.9
Anti-Asian................................................... 37 3.4 6.1 51 3.9 6.9 49 3.9 6.9 26 2.6 4.6
Anti-Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander...... 3 0.3 0.5 4 0.3 0.5 3 0.2 0.4 2 0.2 0.4
Anti-Arab..................................................... 15 1.4 2.5 23 1.7 3.1 23 1.8 3.2 16 1.6 2.8
Anti-multiple races (group).......................... 22 2.0 3.7 32 2.4 4.3 32 2.5 4.5 12 1.2 2.1
Anti-other ethnicity/
national origin........................................... 42 3.8 7.0 46 3.5 6.2 44 3.5 6.2 28 2.8 4.9
Anti-citizenship status................................. 3 0.3 0.5 4 0.3 0.5 3 0.2 0.4 2 0.2 0.4
Religion.......................................................... 207 18.9 100.0 235 17.9 100.0 232 18.3 100.0 87 8.6 100.0
Anti-Jewish................................................. 104 9.5 50.2 115 8.7 48.9 115 9.1 49.6 29 2.9 33.3
Anti-Catholic............................................... 20 1.8 9.7 20 1.5 8.5 20 1.6 8.6 12 1.2 13.8
Anti-Protestant............................................ 7 0.6 3.4 7 0.5 3.0 7 0.6 3.0 0 0.0 0.0
Anti-Islamic (Muslim)................................... 46 4.2 22.2 54 4.1 23.0 54 4.3 23.3 32 3.2 36.8
Anti-Sikh..................................................... 5 0.5 2.4 9 0.7 3.8 7 0.6 3.0 4 0.4 4.6
Anti-multiple religions (group)...................... 3 0.3 1.4 4 0.3 1.7 4 0.3 1.7 1 0.1 1.1
Anti-other religion........................................ 22 2.0 10.6 26 2.0 11.1 25 2.0 10.8 9 0.9 10.3
Anti-atheism/agnosticism/etc....................... 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Sexual orientation.......................................... 246 22.5 100.0 292 22.2 100.0 281 22.1 100.0 312 30.8 100.0
Anti-gay (male)............................................ 172 15.7 69.9 200 15.2 68.5 195 15.4 69.4 205 20.2 65.7
Anti-lesbian................................................. 20 1.8 8.1 23 1.7 7.9 23 1.8 8.2 22 2.2 7.1
Anti-homosexual......................................... 45 4.1 18.3 57 4.3 19.5 52 4.1 18.5 77 7.6 24.7
Anti-heterosexual........................................ 6 0.5 2.4 9 0.7 3.1 8 0.6 2.8 6 0.6 1.9
Anti-bisexual............................................... 3 0.3 1.2 3 0.2 1.0 3 0.2 1.1 2 0.2 0.6
Physical/mental disability............................... 4 0.4 100.0 5 0.4 100.0 5 0.4 100.0 2 0.2 100.0
Anti-physical disability................................. 2 0.2 50.0 2 0.2 40.0 2 0.2 40.0 0 0.0 0.0
Anti-mental disability................................... 2 0.2 50.0 3 0.2 60.0 3 0.2 60.0 2 0.2 100.0
Multiple-bias total............................................. 1 0.1 100.0 4 0.3 100.0 2 0.2 100.0 0 0.0 0.0
Anti-black/anti-gay...................................... 1 0.1 100.0 4 0.3 100.0 2 0.2 100.0 0 0.0 0.0
Notes: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.
An event indicates the occurrence of one or more criminal offenses committed against one or more victims by one or more suspects.
For a more complete definition of each term, please refer to Appendix 2.
San Jose.......................................... 45 51 50 40
Santa Clara...................................... 1 1 1 0
Sunnyvale........................................ 2 2 2 1
Santa Cruz County............................. 12 13 13 13
Sheriff's Dept................................... 2 2 2 2
Capitola............................................ 1 1 1 1
Santa Cruz....................................... 9 10 10 10
Shasta County.................................... 15 19 18 21
Redding........................................... 15 19 18 21
Sierra County...................................... 0 0 0 0
Siskiyou County.................................. 0 0 0 0
Solano County.................................... 9 16 11 2
Sheriff's Dept................................... 1 1 1 0
Benicia............................................. 1 3 1 0
Fairfield............................................ 3 7 5 2
Vacaville.......................................... 4 5 4 0
Sonoma County.................................. 16 19 19 17
Sheriff's Dept................................... 5 6 6 6
Petaluma.......................................... 8 10 10 8
Santa Rosa...................................... 2 2 2 1
Windsor........................................... 1 1 1 2
Stanislaus County............................... 14 16 16 15
Sheriff's Dept................................... 1 1 1 1
Modesto........................................... 10 11 11 13
Turlock............................................. 3 4 4 1
Sutter County...................................... 1 1 1 0
Sheriff's Dept................................... 1 1 1 0
Tehama County.................................. 2 3 3 1
Corning............................................ 1 1 1 0
Red Bluff.......................................... 1 2 2 1
Trinity County...................................... 0 0 0 0
Tulare County..................................... 1 2 2 1
Visalia.............................................. 1 2 2 1
Tuolumne County............................... 0 0 0 0
Ventura County................................... 20 21 20 16
Sheriff's Dept................................... 3 3 3 5
Camarillo.......................................... 1 1 1 0
Oxnard............................................. 7 8 7 2
Simi Valley....................................... 3 3 3 2
(continued)
Table 7A
HATE CRIME PROSECUTORIAL SURVEY RESPONSES, 2017
Number of Cases Referred to Prosecutors by Law Enforcement, Rejections, and Filings by Type
Type of case filing
Hate crime
Cases Criminal case Cases filed as
cases referred Cases filed as
Type of prosecuting attorney rejected filings1 non-bias
to prosecutors hate crimes
motivated crimes
Number Number Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total.................................... 383 135 271 100.0 195 72.0 76 28.0
County District Attorneys... 329 110 241 100.0 186 77.2 55 22.8
Elected City Attorneys....... 54 25 30 100.0 9 30.0 21 70.0
Note: Hate Crime Prosecution Survey is conducted by the Criminal Justice Statistics Center in January following the reporting year.
1
Multiple criminal case filings can result from individual cases referred so total filings and cases rejected can exceed total referred.
Table 7B
HATE CRIME PROSECUTORIAL SURVEY RESPONSES, 2017
Number of Hate Crime Case Dispositions
Hate crime Hate crime convictions
Type of prosecuting All other Total hate crime
cases with Not convicted Guilty plea/
attorney convictions convictions Trial verdict
dispositions nolo contendere
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total.................................... 124 100.0 11 8.9 48 38.7 65 52.4 63 96.9 2 3.1
County District Attorneys... 117 100.0 10 8.5 47 40.2 60 51.3 58 96.7 2 3.3
Elected City Attorneys....... 7 100.0 1 14.3 1 14.3 5 71.4 5 100.0 0 0.0
Note: Hate Crime Prosecution Survey is conducted by the Criminal Justice Statistics Center in January following the reporting year.
Placer........................................ 6 1 1
Plumas....................................... 1 1 0
Riverside.................................... 11 8 0
Sacramento............................... 7 0 4
San Benito................................. 0 0 0
(continued)
San Mateo................................. 5 4 1
Santa Barbara............................ 0 0 0
Santa Clara................................ 5 3 1
Santa Cruz……………………….. 10 3 7
Shasta....................................... 9 4 3
Sierra......................................... 0 0 0
Siskiyou..................................... 0 0 0
Solano....................................... 2 2 0
Sonoma..................................... 1 1 0
Stanislaus.................................. 1 0 0
Sutter......................................... 0 0 0
Tehama..................................... 0 0 0
Trinity......................................... 0 0 0
Tulare........................................ 0 0 0
Tuolumne................................... 0 0 0
Ventura...................................... 4 5 0
Yolo........................................... 5 3 2
Yuba.......................................... 3 3 0
Elected City Attorneys.................. 54 9 21
Chula Vista................................ 0 0 0
Compton.................................... 0 0 0
Huntington Beach...................... 0 0 0
Long Beach................................ 2 2 0
Los Angeles............................... 44 2 19
Oakland..................................... 0 0 0
Redondo Beach......................... 1 1 0
San Bernardino.......................... 0 0 0
San Diego.................................. 7 4 2
San Francisco............................ 0 0 0
San Rafael................................. 0 0 0
Notes: Hate Crime Prosecution Survey is conducted by the Criminal Justice Statistics Center in January following
the reporting year.
The number of complaints filed by county district attorneys and elected city attorneys or the number of
cases that resulted in hate crime convictions cannot be linked to the number of hate crimes reported by
law enforcement agencies.
Race/ethnicity/national origin........................ 800 57.3 626 56.9 613 55.4 587 55.4 528 56.8 489 56.7 412 54.4 428 51.1 519 55.7 602 55.1 -24.8 16.0
Anti-white.................................................. 42 3.0 39 3.5 47 4.2 35 3.3 40 4.3 38 4.4 28 3.7 34 4.1 56 6.0 47 4.3 - -16.1
Anti-black or African American.................. 457 32.7 376 34.2 324 29.3 313 29.5 289 31.1 285 33.0 238 31.4 231 27.6 251 27.0 302 27.6 -33.9 20.3
Anti-Hispanic or Latino.............................. 147 10.5 81 7.4 119 10.7 88 8.3 88 9.5 64 7.4 60 7.9 81 9.7 83 8.9 126 11.5 -14.3 51.8
Anti-American Indian/
Alaskan native........................................ 1 0.1 2 0.2 0 0.0 1 0.1 3 0.3 3 0.3 2 0.3 2 0.2 9 1.0 5 0.5 - -
Anti-Asian................................................. 37 2.6 27 2.5 32 2.9 30 2.8 23 2.5 30 3.5 19 2.5 19 2.3 22 2.4 37 3.4 - -
Anti-Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander1.... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0.1 5 0.5 3 0.3 - -
Anti-Arab2................................................... 13 0.9 13 1.2 17 1.5 21 2.0 17 1.8 21 2.4 12 1.6 12 1.4 19 2.0 15 1.4 - -
Anti-multiple races (group)........................ 47 3.4 34 3.1 34 3.1 37 3.5 22 2.4 18 2.1 14 1.8 17 2.0 34 3.7 22 2.0 - -
Anti-other ethnicity/
national origin2......................................... 56 4.0 54 4.9 40 3.6 60 5.7 45 4.8 28 3.2 37 4.9 30 3.6 37 4.0 42 3.8 -25.0 -
Anti-citizenship status3............................... - - 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.2 1 0.1 2 0.2 2 0.3 1 0.1 3 0.3 3 0.3 - -
Religion........................................................ 294 21.0 210 19.1 198 17.9 201 19.0 145 15.6 129 14.9 127 16.8 190 22.7 171 18.4 207 18.9 -29.6 21.1
Anti-Jewish............................................... 184 13.2 160 14.5 128 11.6 132 12.5 91 9.8 70 8.1 80 10.6 97 11.6 82 8.8 104 9.5 -43.5 26.8
Anti-Catholic............................................. 12 0.9 9 0.8 10 0.9 6 0.6 7 0.8 7 0.8 5 0.7 11 1.3 12 1.3 20 1.8 - -
Anti-Protestant.......................................... 8 0.6 3 0.3 6 0.5 1 0.1 2 0.2 3 0.3 2 0.3 3 0.4 2 0.2 7 0.6 - -
Anti-Islamic (Muslim)................................. 11 0.8 13 1.2 22 2.0 17 1.6 20 2.2 21 2.4 18 2.4 40 4.8 37 4.0 46 4.2 - -
Anti-Sikh4................................................... - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.1 5 0.5 - -
Anti-multiple religions (group).................... 15 1.1 3 0.3 7 0.6 7 0.7 3 0.3 4 0.5 2 0.3 9 1.1 4 0.4 3 0.3 - -
Anti-other religion...................................... 63 4.5 22 2.0 25 2.3 38 3.6 21 2.3 24 2.8 18 2.4 29 3.5 33 3.5 22 2.0 -65.1 -
Anti-atheism/
agnosticism/etc....................................... 1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 - -
Sexual orientation........................................ 283 20.3 245 22.3 279 25.2 244 23.0 235 25.3 216 25.0 187 24.7 188 22.5 207 22.2 246 22.5 -13.1 18.8
Anti-gay (male).......................................... 154 11.0 120 10.9 107 9.7 103 9.7 116 12.5 106 12.3 78 10.3 108 12.9 152 16.3 172 15.7 11.7 13.2
Anti-lesbian............................................... 22 1.6 29 2.6 30 2.7 25 2.4 28 3.0 27 3.1 27 3.6 25 3.0 18 1.9 20 1.8 - -
Anti-homosexual....................................... 102 7.3 95 8.6 136 12.3 111 10.5 88 9.5 77 8.9 79 10.4 48 5.7 32 3.4 45 4.1 -55.9 -
Anti-heterosexual...................................... 3 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.3 2 0.2 1 0.1 3 0.3 1 0.1 3 0.4 4 0.4 6 0.5 - -
Anti-bisexual............................................. 2 0.1 1 0.1 3 0.3 3 0.3 2 0.2 3 0.3 2 0.3 4 0.5 1 0.1 3 0.3 - -
Physical/mental disability.............................. 4 0.3 4 0.4 5 0.5 7 0.7 2 0.2 1 0.1 4 0.5 4 0.5 2 0.2 4 0.4 - -
Anti-physical disability............................... 2 0.1 2 0.2 3 0.3 3 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.3 4 0.5 2 0.2 2 0.2 - -
Anti-mental disability................................. 2 0.1 2 0.2 2 0.2 4 0.4 2 0.2 1 0.1 2 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.2 - -
Gender........................................................ 16 1.1 14 1.3 12 1.1 18 1.7 18 1.9 25 2.9 24 3.2 27 3.2 29 3.1 33 3.0 - -
Anti-male.................................................. 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.4 2 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.1 0 0.0 - -
Anti-female................................................ 3 0.2 4 0.4 1 0.1 3 0.3 2 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.3 1 0.1 1 0.1 4 0.4 - -
Anti-transgender....................................... 13 0.9 10 0.9 11 1.0 11 1.0 14 1.5 24 2.8 22 2.9 24 2.9 25 2.7 27 2.5 - -
Anti-gender non-conforming5...................... - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 0 0.0 2 0.2 2 0.2 2 0.2 - -
Multiple-bias total6........................................... - - 1 - 0 0.0 3 0.3 2 0.2 3 0.3 4 0.5 0 0.0 3 0.3 1 0.1 - -
Notes: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.
Dash indicates that percent changes are not calculated when the base number is less than 50, or that no data were reported.
1
Reporting of anti-Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander began in 2015.
2
Data does not match previously published reports due to the separation of anti-Arab bias type from anti-other ethnicity/national origin bias type.
3
Reporting of anti-citizenship status bias motivation began in 2009.
4
Reporting of anti-Sikh bias motivation began in 2014.
5
Reporting of anti-gender non-conforming bias motivation began in 2013.
6
Reporting of multiple-bias events began in 2009.
Single-bias total............... 1,837 100.0 1,425 99.9 1,425 100.0 1,339 99.4 1,169 99.6 1,066 99.4 966 98.7 1,057 100.0 1,184 99.5 1,311 99.7 -28.6 10.7
Violent crimes................ 1,173 63.9 906 63.5 893 62.7 825 61.2 761 64.8 680 63.4 653 66.7 727 68.8 767 64.5 860 65.4 -26.7 12.1
Murder........................ 2 0.1 2 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.1 3 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.2 - -
Rape........................... 2 0.1 4 0.3 1 0.1 0 0.0 2 0.2 1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.1 0 0.0 - -
Robbery...................... 55 3.0 41 2.9 42 2.9 44 3.3 34 2.9 38 3.5 31 3.2 29 2.7 32 2.7 55 4.2 0.0 -
Aggravated assault..... 281 15.3 216 15.1 203 14.2 193 14.3 235 20.0 153 14.3 185 18.9 212 20.1 189 15.9 242 18.4 -13.9 28.0
Simple assault............. 341 18.6 254 17.8 284 19.9 239 17.7 239 20.4 250 23.3 201 20.5 237 22.4 237 19.9 259 19.7 -24.0 9.3
Intimidation................. 492 26.8 389 27.3 362 25.4 348 25.8 251 21.4 238 22.2 235 24.0 246 23.3 308 25.9 301 22.9 -38.8 -2.3
Property crimes.............. 664 36.1 519 36.4 532 37.3 514 38.2 408 34.8 386 36.0 313 32.0 330 31.2 417 35.0 451 34.3 -32.1 8.2
Burglary...................... 14 0.8 18 1.3 22 1.5 32 2.4 12 1.0 21 2.0 12 1.2 11 1.0 16 1.3 18 1.4 - -
Larceny-theft............... 14 0.8 7 0.5 6 0.4 6 0.4 3 0.3 6 0.6 7 0.7 3 0.3 7 0.6 6 0.5 - -
Motor vehicle theft....... 2 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.1 2 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.2 0 0.0 - -
Arson.......................... 12 0.7 18 1.3 8 0.6 8 0.6 9 0.8 7 0.7 5 0.5 5 0.5 19 1.6 15 1.1 - -
Destruction/vandalism. 622 33.9 475 33.3 495 34.7 467 34.7 382 32.5 350 32.6 289 29.5 311 29.4 373 31.3 412 31.3 -33.8 10.5
Multiple-bias total1............. - - 2 0.1 0 0.0 8 0.6 5 0.4 6 0.6 13 1.3 0 0.0 6 0.5 4 0.3 - -
Notes: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.
Dash indicates that percent changes are not calculated when the base number is less than 50, or that no data were reported.
1
Reporting of multiple-bias offenses began in 2009.
Events.................. 1,397 1,100 1,107 1,060 930 863 758 837 931 1,093
Offenses.............. 1,837 1,427 1,425 1,347 1,174 1,072 979 1,057 1,190 1,315
Victims................. 1,698 1,321 1,320 1,232 1,136 1,045 943 1,041 1,145 1,270
Suspects.............. 1,473 1,202 1,092 1,010 937 875 799 838 982 1,013
Table 16
HATE CRIMES, 2008-2017
Events by Location
Locations 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total................................................... 1,397 1,100 1,107 1,060 930 863 758 837 931 1,093
Church/synagogue/temple............... 107 76 62 73 43 44 36 59 62 73
Highway/road/alley/street................. 363 277 272 263 254 218 212 225 215 253
Parking lot/garage............................ 110 69 74 80 56 52 70 51 61 81
Residence/home/driveway............... 388 303 320 307 236 222 193 217 222 250
School/college1……………………… 148 133 133 111 - - - - - -
1
School, college/university …………… - - - - 42 40 22 26 53 32
1
School, elementary/secondary ……… - - - - 52 46 47 34 62 86
All other locations............................. 281 242 246 226 247 241 178 225 256 318
1
Reporting of School/college separated into School, college/university and School, elementary/secondary in 2012.
Table 17
HATE CRIMES, 2008-2017
Single-Bias Events by Bias Motivation
Bias motivation 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total......................................... 1,397 1,099 1,107 1,057 928 860 754 837 928 1,092
Race/ethnicity/national origin.. 800 626 613 587 528 489 412 428 519 602
Religion.................................. 294 210 198 201 145 129 127 190 171 207
Sexual orientation................... 283 245 279 244 235 216 187 188 207 246
Physical/mental disability........ 4 4 5 7 2 1 4 4 2 4
Gender................................... 16 14 12 18 18 25 24 27 29 33
Table 19
HATE CRIMES, 2008-2017
Single-Bias Events by Religion
Religion 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total............................................ 294 210 198 201 145 129 127 190 171 207
Anti-Jewish................................ 184 160 128 132 91 70 80 97 82 104
Anti-Catholic.............................. 12 9 10 6 7 7 5 11 12 20
Anti-Protestant........................... 8 3 6 1 2 3 2 3 2 7
Anti-Islamic (Muslim)................. 11 13 22 17 20 21 18 40 37 46
Anti-Sikh1.................................... - - - - - - 2 0 1 5
Anti-multiple religions (group).... 15 3 7 7 3 4 2 9 4 3
Anti-other religion...................... 63 22 25 38 21 24 18 29 33 22
Anti-atheism/agnosticism/etc..... 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
1
Reporting of anti-Sikh bias motivation began in 2014.
Table 20
HATE CRIMES, 2008-2017
Single-Bias Events by Sexual Orientation
Sexual orientation 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total.......................................... 283 245 279 244 235 216 187 188 207 246
Anti-gay (male)........................ 154 120 107 103 116 106 78 108 152 172
Anti-lesbian............................. 22 29 30 25 28 27 27 25 18 20
Anti-homosexual...................... 102 95 136 111 88 77 79 48 32 45
Anti-heterosexual.................... 3 0 3 2 1 3 1 3 4 6
Anti-bisexual............................ 2 1 3 3 2 3 2 4 1 3
Table 22
HATE CRIMES, 2008-2017
Single-Bias Offenses by Category
Category 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total......................... 1,837 1,425 1,425 1,339 1,169 1,066 966 1,057 1,184 1,311
Violent offenses..... 1,173 906 893 825 761 680 653 727 767 860
Property offenses... 664 519 532 514 408 386 313 330 417 451
Table 23
HATE CRIMES, 2008-2017
Single-Bias Offenses by Type of Violent Crime
Violent offenses 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total............................... 1,173 906 893 825 761 680 653 727 767 860
Murder......................... 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 3
Rape............................ 2 4 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0
Robbery....................... 55 41 42 44 34 38 31 29 32 55
Aggravated assault...... 281 216 203 193 235 153 185 212 189 242
Simple assault............. 341 254 284 239 239 250 201 237 237 259
Intimidation.................. 492 389 362 348 251 238 235 246 308 301
Table 24
HATE CRIMES, 2008-2017
Single-Bias Offenses by Type of Property Crime
Property offenses 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total.................................. 664 519 532 514 408 386 313 330 417 451
Burglary........................... 14 18 22 32 12 21 12 11 16 18
Larceny-theft................... 14 7 6 6 3 6 7 3 7 6
Motor vehicle theft........... 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 2 0
Arson............................... 12 18 8 8 9 7 5 5 19 15
Destruction/vandalism..... 622 475 495 467 382 350 289 311 373 412
The following information and limitations should be considered when using hate crime data:
1) A hate crime event contains the occurrence of one or more criminal offenses, committed against
one or more victims, by one or more suspects or perpetrators. Victims can have more than one
offense committed against them.
2) Hate crimes reported by law enforcement agencies are counted in a specific way. In each hate
crime event, the DOJ counts the total number of victims, the total number of suspects, and the total
number of criminal offenses in one event. These totals are then classified and counted by type of
bias motivation (e.g., anti-black or African American, anti-Hispanic or Latino, anti-Jewish, anti-gay,
etc.), type of crime (e.g., murder, aggravated assault, burglary, destruction/vandalism, etc.), the
location where the crime took place (e.g., residence, street, synagogue, school, etc.), and the type of
victim (e.g., individual, property, etc.).
3) The DOJ requested that each law enforcement agency establish procedures incorporating a two-
tier review (decision-making) process. The first level is done by the initial officer who responds to
the suspected hate crime incident. At the second level, each report is reviewed by at least one other
officer to confirm that the event was, in fact, a hate crime.
4) Caution should be used when making jurisdictional comparisons. The following factors should
be considered: cultural diversity and population density; size of law enforcement agencies; and
the training received in the identification of hate crimes by law enforcement officers in each
jurisdiction.
5) The following factors may influence the volume of hate crimes reported to the DOJ:
• Cultural practices of individuals and their likeliness to report hate crimes to law enforcement
agencies.
• Strength and investigative emphasis of law enforcement agencies.
• Policies of law enforcement agencies.
• Community policing policies.
In 2011, the DOJ expanded the acceptable location codes for the California hate crime data
collection system to reflect modifications implemented at the national level.
In 2013, the DOJ expanded the gender bias for the California hate crime data collection system to
include gender non-conforming in order to reflect modifications implemented at the national level.
In 2014, the DOJ expanded the religion bias for the California hate crime data collection system to
include Sikh in order to reflect modifications implemented at the national level.
In 2015, the DOJ expanded the race and ethnicity bias for the California hate crime data collection
system to include Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander in order to reflect modifications implemented
at the national level.
7) There is a significant disparity between the number of individual and entity victims that stems
from the DOJ’s Criminal Justice Statistics Center’s use of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI’s)
Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program standards. A property crime against an entity (a business,
religious organization, government institution, etc.) can only be counted as one victim, whereas a
crime committed against an individual can have more than one victim counted per crime event.
8) In 2013, the FBI’s UCR program revised the definition of “forcible rape” (the carnal knowledge of a
female forcibly and against her will) to “rape,” which is now defined as “penetration, no matter how
slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of
another person, without the consent of the victim.” The California DOJ implemented this definition
change in January 2014.
1) In order to show the criminal justice system’s response to hate crimes, in 1995 the Attorney General
asked all district attorneys and elected city attorneys to submit summary data of complaints filed
and convictions secured.
2) The 2017 District Attorney and Elected City Attorney’s Report File of Hate Crime Cases contains
summary data based on cases referred to each district attorney or elected city attorney, and filings
and convictions that occurred from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017.
3) When viewing prosecutorial data, it is not possible to relate the number of hate crimes reported by
law enforcement agencies to the number of hate crimes prosecuted by district attorneys and city
attorneys. First, crimes often occur in different reporting years than their subsequent prosecutions.
Second, the number of crimes reported by law enforcement is much higher than those calling for
prosecutorial action since the latter requires an arrested defendant who can be prosecuted in a
court of law.
4) All prosecutorial data includes hate crimes committed by both juvenile and adult defendants.
5) Glenn County District Attorney did not report data for 2014.
Bias – A preformed negative opinion or attitude toward a group of persons based on their race,
ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or physical/mental disability.
Bisexual – Of or relating to persons who experience sexual attraction toward and responsiveness to
both males and females; (noun) a bisexual person.
Case – A set of facts about a crime that is referred to a district attorney for filing with a court. The case
may charge one or more persons with the commission of one or more offenses. (For this report, the
case must contain some element of bias.)
Complaints Filed – Any verified written accusation, filed by a district attorney with a criminal court,
that charges one or more persons with the commission of one or more offenses. (For this report, the
case must contain some element of bias.)
Conviction – A judgment based on the verdict of a jury or a judicial officer or on a guilty plea or a nolo
contendere plea of the defendant.
Disposition – In criminal procedure, the sentencing or other final settlement of a criminal case.
Ethnic Bias – A preformed negative opinion or attitude toward a group of persons of the same race or
national origin who share common or similar traits in language, custom, and tradition.
Event – An occurrence when a hate crime is involved. (In this report, the information about the event
is a crime report or source document that meets the criteria for a hate crime.) There may be one or
more suspects involved, one or more victims targeted, and one or more offenses involved for each
event.
Gay – Of or relating to males who experience a sexual attraction toward and responsiveness to other
males; (noun) a homosexual male.
Gender Non-Conforming – (adjective) Describes a person who does not conform to the gender-
based expectations of society, e.g., a woman dressed in traditionally male clothing or a man wearing
makeup.
Guilty Plea – A defendant’s formal answer in open court stating that the charge is true and that he or
she is guilty of the crime charged.
Heterosexual – Of or relating to persons who experience sexual attraction toward and responsiveness
to members of the opposite sex; (noun) a heterosexual person.
Homosexual – Of or relating to persons who experience sexual attraction toward and responsiveness
to members of their own sex; (noun) a homosexual person.
Lesbian – Of or relating to females who experience sexual attraction toward and responsiveness to
other females; (noun) a homosexual female.
Location – The place where the hate crime event occurred. The location categories follow UCR
location specifications developed by the FBI. Examples are residence, hotel, bar, church, etc.
Multi-Racial – A hate crime that involves more than one victim or suspect, and where the victims or
suspects are from two or more different race groups, such as African American and white or Hispanic
and Asian.
Nolo Contendere – A plea or answer in a criminal action in which the accused does not admit guilt
but agrees to be subject to the same punishment as if he or she were guilty.
Offenses – Criminal acts that are recorded as follows: murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault,
burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, simple assault, intimidation, and destruction/
vandalism as defined in the UCR and the national Hate Crimes Statistics Report.
Property Crimes – Burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and destruction/vandalism are
reported as property crimes.
Racial Bias – A preformed negative opinion or attitude toward a group of persons—such as Asians,
blacks, or whites—based on physical characteristics.
Relationship Between “Complaints Filed” and “Convictions” – The annual prosecutorial report
collects data on the total number of hate crime cases filed and the total number of hate crime
convictions. There is no direct relationship between “complaints filed” and “convictions” since a case
may be filed in one year and the outcome (trial or pleading) may occur in another.
Religious Bias – A preformed negative opinion or attitude toward a group of persons based on
religious beliefs regarding the origin and purpose of the universe and the existence or nonexistence of
a supreme being. Examples are Catholics, Jews, Protestants, or Atheists.
Sexual-Orientation Bias – A preformed negative opinion or attitude toward a group of persons based
on sexual preferences and/or attractions toward and responsiveness to members of their own or
opposite sexes.
Simple Assault – An unlawful attack by one person upon another that does not involve the use of a
firearm, knife, cutting instrument, or other dangerous weapon and in which there were no serious or
aggravated injuries to the victim (FBI’s UCR definition).
Uniform Crime Reporting – A federal reporting system that provides data on crime based on police
statistics submitted by law enforcement agencies throughout the nation. The DOJ administers and
forwards the data for California to the federal program.
Violent Crimes – Murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, simple assault, and intimidation are
considered violent crimes in this report. (Robbery is included in crimes against property in the FBI Hate
Crimes Statistics Report.)