The Lawphil Project – Arellano Law Foundation

ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 22-95 October 11, 1995

TO: COURT OF APPEALS, SANDIGANBAYAN, COURT OF TAX APPEALS, REGIONAL
TRIALS COURTS, METROPOLITAN TRIALS COURTS, MUNICIPAL TRIALS COURTS,
MUNICIPAL TRIALS COURTS IN CITIES, MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIALS COURTS, SHARI'A
DISTRICT COURTS, SHARI'A CIRCUIT COURTS AND ALL MEMBERS OF THE
INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF SECTIONS 1 AND 6, RULES 71 OF THE RULES OF
COURT
Rule 71 of the present Rules of Court provides the penalties for direct and indirect contempt committed
against superior and inferior courts, to wit:
(1) In direct contempt, a fine not exceeding P200.00 or imprisonment not exceeding 10 days, or both,
if it be a superior court, and a fine not exceeding P10.00 or imprisonment not exceeding 1 day, or both, if
it be an inferior court (Section 1); and
(2) In indirect contempt, a fine not exceeding P1,000.00 or imprisonment of not more than 6 months,
or both, if against a superior court, and a fine not exceeding P1,000.00 or imprisonment of not more than
1 month, or both, if against an inferior court (Section 6).
The Court takes judicial notice that these were the same penalties for direct and indirect contempt which
were imposed by Sections 1 and 6, Rule 64 of the old Rules of Court which took effect on July 1, 1940,
or more than 55 years ago.
The Court also takes cognizance of the fact that the amount of the fine, whether imposed as a
complementary or an alternative penalty, was intended to be the financial equivalent of the term of
imprisonment for the offense, from the standpoint of severity, taking into account the nature of the
offensive acts and the courts against which they were committed.
In view of the present value of our currency under either the prevailing international rates of exchange or
the consumer price index which, however, are subject to variant factors, and considering that the
minimum daily wage has often been adopted as the basis for determining the amount of the fine in our
penal laws, the aforestated provisions of Rule 71 have to be amended to keep the same abreast with
monetary changes by increasing the amount of the imposable fine, with the average national minimum
wage as the approximate basis therefor.
Accordingly, the Court Resolved to AMEND the provisions of Sections 1 and 6, Rule 71 of the Rules of
Court to read as follows:
SECTION 1. — Direct contempt punished summarily. — A person guilty of misbehavior in the presence
of or so near a court or judge as to obstruct or interrupt the proceedings before the same, including
disrespect toward the court or judge, offensive personalities toward others, or refusal to be sworn or to
answer as witness, or to subscribe an affidavit or deposition when lawfully required to do so, may be
summarily adjudged in contempt by such court or judge and punished by a fine not exceeding two
thousand pesos or imprisonment not exceeding ten (10) days, or both, if it be a superior court, or a judge
thereof, or by a fine not exceeding two hundred pesos or imprisonment not exceeding one (1) day, or
both, if it be an inferior court."
Sec. 6. — Punishment if found guilty. — If the accused is thereupon adjudged guilty of contempt
committed against a superior court or judge, he may be fined not exceeding thirty thousand pesos or
imprisoned not more than six (6) months, or both; if adjudged guilty of contempt committed against an
inferior court or judge, he may be fined not exceeding five thousand pesos or imprisoned not more than
one (1) month, or both, and if the contempt consist in the violation of an injunction, he may also be
ordered to make complete restitution to the party injured by such violation."
This Administrative Circular No. 22-95 shall be published in two (2) newspapers of general circulation
and shall take effect on November 16, 1995.
October 11, 1995.
(Sgd.) ANDRES R. NARVASA
Chief Justice
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation

The Lawphil Project – Arellano Law Foundation