Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
We are grateful and we would like to express our sincere gratitude to our supervisors Ato Mewael
Gebrehiwet and Ato Moges Samuel for providing this interesting and exciting topic and then
providing their guidance, assistance and encouragement throughout the duration of the project. We
appreciate their consistent support from the first day we applied to graduate program to these
concluding moments.
Sincere thanks to all staff of the Mechanical Engineering Department, who helped us in many ways
and providing equipment and information sources that assisted our studies and projects.
Special thanks to our mechanic Ato Mulu for his supporting idea and completed our manufacturing
process.
To all our friends and classmates, thanks for the comments and suggestions given which is crucial for
the successful completion of this project.
Special thanks to our lovely parents for their support, love, dream and sacrifice throughout our life.
We would like to appreciate their devotion, support and faith in our ability to attain our goals.
I
Reverse Engineering On Chassis For Tri Wheel Vehicle
ABSTRACT
The objective of this thesis is reverse engineering on the chassis of three wheel vehicle (Bajaj). A
timeframe of one semester was given to complete the design and manufacturing of the project. The
design process had been broken down into three phases of goals to accomplish: The research
(literature reviews), design and manufacturing. The final product and the report, a 3-dimensional
mode of this project was carried out by using CATIA software. The parameters checked in the
analysis are the displacement of the chassis structure when load applied and the weight of the chassis
in static and dynamic conditions. Specifications of materials selection become a priority in order to
construct the new chassis which can replace the ordinary design. The best design was then identified
based on the analysis determined from CATIA technique. The specifications of the best design are
the design which is good strength, manufactured from local material and has a minimum deflection of
the structure when subjected on the load. The design of the final chassis design was done by using
CATIA software which is suitable for making the 3D model of the Bajaj (tri wheel vehicle). The
three main goals, research, design and manufacturing were met successfully in the allotted of time.
Lists of Figures
Figure 1. 1 The Tvs King ................................................................................................................... - 4 -
Figure 1. 2 Piaggio Ape .................................................................................................................... - 5 -
Figure 1. 3 Bajaj ................................................................................................................................ - 6 -
Figure 1. 4 Ladder Frame Chassis ..................................................................................................... - 8 -
Figure 1. 5 Twin Tube Chassis .......................................................................................................... - 8 -
Figure 1. 6 Four Tube Chassisbackbone ............................................................................................ - 9 -
Figure 1. 7 Backbone Chassis .......................................................................................................... - 10 -
Figure 1. 8 Spaceframe .................................................................................................................... - 11 -
Figure 1. 9 Monocoque Chassis ....................................................................................................... - 12 -
Figure 1. 10 Measuring The Current Chassis .................................................................................. - 15 -
Figure 1. 11 Leveling The Current Chassis ..................................................................................... - 16 -
Figure 1. 12 Solid Model Of Chassis Of Tri Wheel Vehicle ........................................................... - 16 -
Figure 2. 1 Catia Model Passenger Support..................................................................................... - 23 -
Figure 2. 2 Overview Meshed Passenger Support ........................................................................... - 24 -
Figure 2. 3 Passengers Support Thicknesses ................................................................................... - 24 -
Figure 2. 4 Passengers Support Constraints ..................................................................................... - 25 -
Figure 2. 5 Disturbed Loads On The Passengers Support Plate ...................................................... - 25 -
Figure 2. 6 Plate Top Von Mises Stress Of Passenger Support (N/M^2) ........................................ - 26 -
Figure 2. 7 Plate Translational Displacement Of Passenger Support .............................................. - 26 -
Figure 2. 8 Former And Modified Main Frame ............................................................................... - 27 -
Figure 2. 9 Catia Model Main Frame............................................................................................... - 27 -
Figure 2. 10 Overview Mesh Of Main Frame.................................................................................. - 28 -
Figure 2. 11 Main Frame Constraints .............................................................................................. - 28 -
Figure 2. 12 Distributed Load In The Main Frameplate Thickness ................................................. - 29 -
Figure 2. 13 Main Frame Thickness ................................................................................................ - 29 -
Figure 2. 14 Plate Von Mises Stress Of Main Frame Of Chassis (N/M^2) ..................................... - 30 -
Figure 2. 15 Plate Translational Displacement Of Main Frame Of Chassis (Mm) ......................... - 30 -
Figure 2. 16 The Automobile Is Simply Modeled As A Single Degree Of Freedom Model. ......... - 31 -
Figure 2. 17 Displacement Transmissibility .................................................................................. - 32 -
Lists of Tables
Table 3. 1 Manufacturing Process Analysis..................................................................................... - 40 -
Table 3. 2 Manufacturing Process Analysis..................................................................................... - 40 -
Table 3. 3 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 1...................................................... - 42 -
Table 3. 4 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 2....................................................... - 43 -
Table 3. 5 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 3...................................................... - 44 -
Table 3. 6 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 4...................................................... - 45 -
Table 3. 7 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 6...................................................... - 46 -
Table 3. 8 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 7...................................................... - 47 -
Table 3. 9 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 8....................................................... - 48 -
Table 3. 10 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 9.................................................... - 49 -
Table 3. 11 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 10 .................................................. - 50 -
Table 3. 12 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 11.................................................. - 51 -
Table 3. 13 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 11 B .............................................. - 52 -
Table 3. 14 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 11c ................................................ - 53 -
Table 3. 15 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 12.................................................. - 54 -
Table 3. 16 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 13 .................................................. - 55 -
Table 3. 17 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 13b ................................................ - 56 -
Table 3. 18 Manufacturing Process Description Sheet Of Part 13c ................................................ - 57 -
Table 3. 19 Cost Analysis Of The Twv Chassis. ................................................................................. - 71 -
Table 3. 20 Cost Analysis Of The Twv Chassis. ................................................................................ - 71 -
Table 3. 21 Production Cost ............................................................................................................. - 72 -
Table of content
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................................... I
ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................................................... II
Lists of Figures..................................................................................................................................................................... III
Lists of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................................... V
CHAPTER - ONE ............................................................................................................................................................. - 1 -
1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. - 1 -
1.2 LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................................................................................... - 2 -
1.2 .1 Reverse Engineering ...................................................................................................................................... - 2 -
1.2.1 Auto Rickshaws .............................................................................................................................................. - 3 -
1.2.2 Chassis ............................................................................................................................................................ - 7 -
1.3. PROBLEM STATEMENT ................................................................................................................................. - 13 -
1.4. OBJECTIVE OF THIS PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... - 14 -
1.4.1General Objective .......................................................................................................................................... - 14 -
1.4.2 Specific Project Objective ............................................................................................................................ - 14 -
1.5. PROJECT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ - 15 -
CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................................................................ - 18 -
DESIGN ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................................. - 18 -
2.1. Specification of requirements ......................................................................................................................... - 18 -
2.2. MATLAB calculations ................................................................................................................................... - 19 -
2.3. CATIA Model of a Vehicle Chassis ............................................................................................................... - 21 -
2.3 Analytical Verification .................................................................................................................................... - 34 -
2.4 Weld Design .................................................................................................................................................... - 35 -
2.5 Stability of Chassis .......................................................................................................................................... - 37 -
CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................................................................................... - 39 -
MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLING PROCEDURE .................................................................................... - 39 -
3.1 Manufacturing Procedure ................................................................................................................................ - 39 -
3.2 ASSEMBLING PROCEDURE ....................................................................................................................... - 61 -
3.3 cost analysis ..................................................................................................................................................... - 69 -
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... - 73 -
Recommendation ............................................................................................................................................................ - 74 -
APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................................................... - 75 -
Detail drawing ............................................................................................................................................................ - 76 -
ASSEMBLING DRAWING ...................................................................................................................................... - 96 -
MATLAB script ....................................................................................................................................................... - 100 -
Tables ....................................................................................................................................................................... - 105 -
CATIA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. - 108 -
Reference ...................................................................................................................................................................... - 109 -
-1-
Reverse Engineering On Chassis For Tri Wheel Vehicle
At the end, re engineering rather than innovating gets a high emphasis by our governmental strategy
and policy so the realization of this research will be a corner stone and basement to customize other
technologies and system as well our dream will be true.
Forward engineering is the traditional process of moving from high-level abstractions and logical
designs to the physical implementation of a system. In some situations, there may be a physical part
without any technical details, such as drawings, bills-of-material, or without engineering data, such as
thermal and electrical properties.
The process of duplicating an existing component, subassembly, or product, without the aid of
drawings, documentation, or computer model is known as reverse engineering.
Reverse engineering can be view as the process of analyzing a system to:
According to A Methodology for Reverse Engineering, reverse engineering consists of the following
steps:
Observe and assess the mechanisms that make the device work.
Analyze and study the inner workings of a mechanical device.
Compare the actual device to your observations and suggest improvement.
Reverse engineering is very common in such diverse fields as, automotive, mechanical designs. For
example, when a new machine comes to market, competing manufacturers may buy one machine and
disassemble it to learn how it is built and how it works.
Reverse engineering enables the duplication of an existing part by capturing the component's physical
dimensions, features, and material properties.
The following are reasons for reverse engineering taking on the TWV chassis
Many three-wheelers that exist in the form of motorcycle-based machines are often called trikes and
often have the front single wheel and mechanics similar to that of a motorcycle and the rear axle
similar to that of a car. Often such vehicles are owner-constructed using a portion of a rear-engine,
rear-drive in combination with a motorcycle front end. Three-wheeled automobiles can have either
one wheel at the back and two at the front, or one wheel at the front and two at the back .chassis is
one part of the three-wheel vehicle which is one part of our project.
Some common auto rickshaws on the market are;
TVS King
Piaggio Ape
Bajaj
Mahindra & Mahindra
Tuk Tuk Forwarder Co., Ltd
Monika Motors
A.TVS King
The first auto rickshaw developed by TVS Motor was named TVS King and was introduced in 2008;
it was the first auto rickshaw model in India with a four stroke 200 cc engine. The TVS King uses
trailing link as front suspension and individual trailing arms as rear suspension and it has got constant
rate coil springs with co-axial hydraulic dampers. [10]
B. Piaggio Ape
The first “auto rickshaw” was produced in 1948 by the Italian company Piaggio & C. SpA. The
model was named Ape and they are produced in three different types; van, pick-up and rickshaw.
Figure 2 shows the Piaggio Ape Callessino which is one of many versions. It has got a semi-
monocoque frame and a steel body in the front that fits either one or two peoples, while the rear is
built as a single load-bearing chassis in sheet metal. [12]
The rear suspension consists of trailing arms, spring coils and shock absorbers and in the front there
is a leading link suspension [12].
C.Bajaj
Bajaj Auto is the fourth largest manufacturer of two- and three-wheelers in the world and the largest
three wheel producer in India which makes them a rival to TVS. The Bajaj auto rickshaws are very
common on the Indian market. One common version is the Bajaj RE which is shown in Figure 1.3.
[14] The first rickshaw built by Bajaj was licensed under Piaggio/Vespa and appeared on the market
1950. They used same mechanics as the Piaggio Ape but changed its appearance and even introduced
a taxi version which Piaggio Ape did not have. [14]
This means that they still used the trailing arms together with shock absorbers and springs as rear
suspension and leading link as front suspension.[14]
1.2.2 Chassis
Chassis is as a framework to support the body, engine and other parts which make up the vehicle. It
usually includes a pair of longitudinally extending channels and multiple transverse cross members
that intersect the channels. The transverse members have a reduced cross section in order to allow for
a longitudinally extending storage space.
In a modern vehicle, chassis is expected to fulfill the following functions:
Provide mounting points for the suspensions, the steering mechanism, the engine and
gearbox, the final drive, the fuel tank and the seating for the occupants;
Provide rigidity for accurate handling;
Protect the occupants against external impact
While fulfilling these functions, the chassis should be light enough to reduce inertia and offer
satisfactory performance. It should also be tough enough to resist fatigue loads that are produced due
to the interaction between the driver, the engine and power transmission and the road, finally the
safety of the chassis is a major aspect in the design, and should be considered through all stages.
I. Ladder frame
A ladder frame is the simplest and oldest frame used in modern vehicle construction. It was originally
adapted from “horse and buggy” style carriages as it provided sufficient strength for holding the
weight of the components .Larger beams could be used if there were higher weight capacity required.
The engine of the vehicle using this ladder frame is placed in the front or sometimes in the rear and
supported at suspensions points. Their constructions consist 8 of two longitudinal rails interconnected
by many lateral/cross braces, typically made from round or rectangular tubing or channel. The
longitude members are the main stress member. They deal with the load and also the longitudinal
forces caused by acceleration and braking. It can use straight or curved members. The lateral and
cross members provide rigidity to the structure because it provides resistance to lateral forces and
further increase torsion rigidity. Body mounts are usually integral outriggers from the main rails, and
suspension points can be well or poorly integrated into the basic design. Most SUV’s are still use
ladder a typical ladder frame is shown below in Fig. 1.4.
IV. Spaceframe
Although the spaceframe demonstrated a logical development of the four-tube chassis, the space
frame differs in several key areas and offers enormous advantages over its predecessors. A
spaceframe is one in which many straight tubes are arranged so that the loads experienced all act in
either tension or compression. This is a major advantage, since none of the tubes are subject to a
bending load. Since space frames are inherently stiff in torsion, very little material is needed so they
can be lightweight.
The growing realization of the need for increased chassis torsional stiffness in the years following
World War II led to the space frame, or a variation of it, becoming universal among European road
race cars following its appearance on both the Lotus Mk IV and the Mercedes 300 SL in 1952 While
these cars were not strictly the first to use space frames, they were widely successful, and the
attention they received popularized the idea.
Figure 1. 8 Spaceframe
V. Stressed skin
The next logical step for chassis development was the stressed skin design. This is more difficult to
construct than a spaceframe with the accurate folding, forming, drilling and riveting of sheet steel or
modern composite materials. The lessons learnt in the aircraft industry do not usually apply directly
in automotive practice. The loads on aircraft are widely distributed – the lift that holds a plane up, for
example, is spread over the entire area of its wings. On a race/sports car, the loads are much more
concentrated, being focused on the suspension mounting points.
Even when a method is developed to accept forces and spread them over a load bearing skin, it
becomes extremely inconvenient to make any modifications and may even require a major redesign.
Analysis of the stresses in stressed skin construction is more difficult.
The continuous surface considerably complicates access for repair or replacement of the cars
mechanical components. This may also explain why stressed skin construction was virtually unheard
of in racecars before the modern mid-engined configuration. The majority of mid-engined racecars
end their stressed skin construction at the back of the cockpit, with either a space frame or the engine
itself forming the remainder of the structure. For all these drawbacks, stressed skin construction can
potentially outperform any other form of racecar construction in terms of torsional stiffness.
VI. Monocoque
A monocoque chassis can be refer to the vehicle where the external body is load bearing (Keith J.
Wakeham, 2009). Monocoque is a one-piece structure which defines the overall shape of the car.
While ladder, tubular space frame and backbone chassis provides only the stress members and need
to build the body around them, monoque 9 chassis is already incorporated with the body in a single
piece. It built by welding several pieces together. It’s different from the ladder and backbone due to
the body construction as mentioned before. The floor pan, which is the largest piece, and other pieces
are press-made by big stamping machines. They are spot welded together by robot arms some even
use laser welding in a stream production line. The whole process just takes minutes. After that, some
accessories like doors, bonnet, boot lid, side panels and roof are added. Most commercial vehicles
today are of the monocoque variety but they generally will differ from the shape implied by road
racing vehicle structure. Common vehicles such as the Honda Civic and Chev Impala are stamped
from steel panels, these panels are then assembled and spot resistance welded together to build the car
structure (Keith J. Wakeham, 2009). Monocoque chassis also benefit crash protection. Because it uses
a lot of metal, crumple zone can be built into the structure. Although monocoque is suitable for mass
production by robots, it is nearly impossible for small-scale production. The setup cost for the tooling
is too expensive such as big stamping machines and expensive moldings. Figure below shows the
type of monocoque chassis.
4. Analyze chassis components and structure using CATIA: Analyze and optimize key structural
components using CATIA Software to determine part stresses.
5. Produce drawings for fabricated components: Produce detailed drawings for all fabricated
components. Create assembly drawing and parts list for all required components.
6. Manufacturing the chassis components:
7. Assemble the tri wheel vehicle chassis: Assemble all components and bench test sub-
assemblies. Test motor controller module before installing on vehicle, road test vehicle and
adjust as required.
8. Test tri wheel vehicle: This is final steps of the project are testing the tri wheel vehicle to
ensure all components functioned as designed.
CHAPTER TWO
DESIGN ANALYSIS
2.1. Specification of requirements
There are some specifications that need to consider the TWV chassis. Some requirements are listed
below. Parameters as top speed, wheel base, wheel track, overall length, overall width and overall
height are taken the specifications for the TWV (Bajaj).
The parameters from the TWV specifications follow below:
Top speed: ~40 km/h
Wheel base: ~1900mm
Wheel track: ~920mm
Overall length: ~2500 mm
Overall width: ~1240 mm
Overall height: ~1630mm
Load capacity: 1 driver + 3 passengers
4.00-8, 4PR original Bajaj wheel in rear and front
20 cm distance from rear of the rear wheel to rearmost of the vehicle
No transverse axle
Some of the listed parameters above can be changed while some specifications have to be kept as
closely as possible as considering cost, weight and manufacturing process. The reason for that is if
the new TWV shall be able to be sold to the intended costumers who are low income takers, the TWV
must keep the limits of the permits for small lightweight three wheeled vehicles. If the vehicle does
not fulfill those parameters a new permit has to be issued which is a too large expense for the
costumer.
This gives a smaller control field but the main goal is still to create a safer TWV with better handling
and vehicle dynamic behavior. Parameters that can be changed are shape and cross section of the
chassis.
The wheels used in the front and rear wheels with the dimension; 4.00-8, 70E 4PR. The rear and front
wheel arc including the suspension damping system. The rear wheel had to be mounted ~20 cm from
the rear of the wheel to rearmost of the vehicle, i.e. the wheel centre needed to be mounted ~40 cm
from the rearmost of the TWV (to keep the wheel protected in an event of a small impact.)
A transverse axle cannot be used since the TWV is intended to have a flat floor in the middle while
keeping the ground clearance high enough, without affecting the body space of the vehicle, i.e. there
is no space for a transverse axle.
There are some parameters to consider when running the simulations, as the top speed around 40
km/h.
The vehicle was designed for one driver, three passengers and some additional object. The people
situated in the TWV should be included in the weight distribution which also is an input for the
simulations.
(𝑚𝑎∗𝑝𝑎)∗(𝑚𝑏∗𝑝𝑏)
Centre of mass: CM= ……………………………..2
𝑚𝑎∗𝑚𝑏
The MATLAB script for the calculation could easily be modified if the positions or masses of the
“parts” would be changed.
With two rear wheels and one front wheel; called a delta shape, a stable triangular zone formed from
the wheel positions could be drawn. The position of the centre of gravity should be within the
triangular zone to maintain stable characteristics.
Within the MATLAB script, the weight distribution on each wheel was calculated, since the centre of
gravity is not located in the centre of the vehicle. TWV got three wheels instead of four which implies
that the front wheel might have to carry more weight than the rear wheels. As the position of the
centre of gravity for full load is located more to the rear than the front, more weight will be carried by
the rear springs. With only one front wheel, the weight that is distributed to the front will be carried
by that spring alone.
For the rear part, the weight distribution on each side needed to be calculated (since there are two rear
wheels). The spring stiffness coefficient was calculated and retrieved from the side that carried the
most weight, but the same value were used on both sides since the rear springs are placed
symmetrical and should have the same spring stiffness coefficient.
When the weight distribution is known the resulting force on each wheel could be calculated, which
is the same as the force the springs should withstand for a given length.
To calculate the spring coil turns and coil diameter which defines the fully compressed damper an
equation was needed.
The spring constant of the spring (K):
(𝐺∗𝑑4 )
K=(8∗𝐷3 ∗𝑛)………………………………………..……………3
Where d is the coil diameter, n is the number of coil turns, D is the spring outer diameter and G is the
shear modulus [3].
The already known essential parameters were the reasonable spring outer diameter, the spring
stiffness coefficient and the information on the defining piston length. The shear modulus for
AISI 9260 is 190-210 GPa [2].
With the known essential parameter mentioned above the number of coil turns can be easily found.
Spring outer diameter:
o Front: 55 mm
o Rear: 80 mm
Shear modulus:
o Front: 200 GPa
o Rear: 200 GPa
By-Berihu Girmay & Mehari Alema Page - 20 -
Reverse Engineering On Chassis For Tri Wheel Vehicle
Coil turns
o Front: 12
o Rear: 10
Coil diameter:
o Front: 7 mm
o Rear:10 mm
Spring coefficient:
o Front: N/mm
o Rear: N/mm
Damping constant
o Front:2Ns/mm
o Rear:2.2Ns/mm
Front “tire properties”
Stiffness:160 N/mm
Material Damping: 16 N*sec/mm
Rear “tire properties
Stiffness: 160 N/mm
Material Damping: 16 N*sec/mm
Total spring constant
o Front:38N/mm
o Rear:49N/mm
Total damping constant
o Front:1.7Ns/mm
o Rear:1.9Ns/mm
engine mountings, passenger and driver support, etc. Spring elements have been used for suspension
stiffness of the vehicle.
CATIA was used to model the deflection of the chassis under worst case loading.
As all chassis parts modeled in CATIA software are managed as rigid bodies and dynamic bodies a
simulation had to be carried out on the different part of chassis like main frame, passenger support,
driver support and engine support to make it behave as a real one. The CATIA simulation application
allowed a model to be optimized for the different part of the chassis dimension of the TWV.
One of chassis objective is to hold the vehicle weight; this is made possible with a different type of
section (i.e. including, Z-section, C-section, O-section, and I-section). The simulation on the CATIA
made as follow procedure:
1. Assigning material property; material property of the Chassis was assigned to steel 37 since it
is a common material used in chassis and easily available in local area.
2. Modeling and Create a mesh of the chassis part where tetrahedral 3D elements of medium
size 5 mm were used. The element size defines the resolution of the deformation/displacement
calculations. Smaller element sizes give a higher resolution and slower solve performance. On
the other hand too large element size can give inaccurate results. With this information an
element size of 5 mm was found reasonable.
3. Specifying the restraint at the connection points on each side of the chassis parts where the
end links were connected.
4. Assigning load distribution on the chassis part.
The structure can be simply assumed as beam, with uniformly distributed load due to passenger,
driver & body over its length, and the point loads at the engine, transmission and various heavily
loaded accessories. It is fixed at its three wheels or suspensions.
Specification of material
material: steel 37
factor of safety=2.5
Young Modulus =2.1e+011N_m2
Poisson Ratio= 0.29
Density =7860kg_m3
Thermal Expansion =1.17e-005_Kdeg
Yield Strength =2.3e+008N_m2
Figure 1.3 gives the used plate thicknesses of the plate elements in the CATIA model of the
Passengers support.
Plates thickness=2mm
2mm
2mm
The Passengers support is constrained at the location of the top surface of the main frame and on the
tube. All plates are given the boundary conditions as depicted below to avoid failure mode.
Boundary
face
b) Mesh
Table 2. 2 Mesh properties
Part type Average size Material Factor of safety
Main frame Octree Terraredon 5mm Steel 37 2.5
mesh
c) Boundary condition
The main frame of the chassis is supported on the shown pictures. These supports are fixing
supported.
……………………………………………4
Where
𝜀: Damping ratio
r: Frequency ratio
p: peak to peak distance
a: static displacement
When the frequency ratio is greater than sqrt (2), the displacement transmitted is less than the
static displacement. It means that the damping has a negative effect. In other words, lightly
damped systems have lower displacement transmissibility than those with larger damping.
When the frequency ratio is less than sqrt (2), the displacement transmitted is larger than the
static displacement. Larger damping values significantly reduce the displacement
transmissibility.
……………………………………………………5
When the frequency ratio is greater than sqrt (2), the force transmitted is still larger than the
static force. It is unlike the displacement transmissibility.
When the frequency ratio is less than sqrt (2), the increase in magnitude is not as severe as for
the ratio less than sqrt (2). In this range, the damping has a negative effect. Lightly damped
systems have lower force transmissibility than those with larger damping.
g) Results main frame of the chassis in dynamic condition
From the MATILAB script the maximum force transmitted to the vehicle is due to rough road
Velocity=40km/h
Static displacement=6cm
Peak to peak distance=100cm
Force transmitted to the chassis = 8990N
Maximum stress = 71.3 Mpa which this shows the main frame of chassis in safe mode
considering the allowable yield stress.
The maximum deflection=0.105mm which this result shows the object is safe.
q=1924N/m
S2
S1
In this section the maximum stress occurs on the center of the section
𝐹(𝑏ℎ+𝑆2(ℎ−𝑆2)
𝑞= ……………………………………………………………………6
2𝐼𝑥
A welded joint is a permanent joint which is obtained by the fusion of the edges of the two parts
to be joined together, with or without the application of pressure and a filler material. The heat
required for the fusion of the material may be obtained by burning of gas (in case of gas welding) or
by an electric arc (in case of electric arc welding). The latter method is extensively used because of
greater speed of welding.
Welding is extensively used in fabrication as an alternative method for casting or forging
and as a replacement for bolted and riveted joints. It is also used as a repair medium e.g. to reunite
metal at a crack, to build up a small part that has broken off such as gear tooth or to repair a worn
surface such as a bearing surface.
The weld joint preferred for the chassis connection based on the following reason
The welded structures are usually lighter. This is due to the reason, that
in welding, gussets or other connecting components are not used.
The welded joints provide maximum efficiency
In welded connections, the tension members are less weakened
A welded joint has a great strength. Often a welded joint has the
strength of the parent metal itself.
Since, the members are of such a shape (i.e. circular steel pipes) that
they afford difficulty for riveting. But they can be easily welded.
The welding provides very rigid joints. This is in line with the modern
trend of providing rigid frames.
It is possible to weld any part of a structure at any point.
The process of welding takes less time than the riveting.
2.4.1 Weld design in the main frame
Welding area
triangular zone to maintain stable characteristics. In Figure the different weights are shown inserted in
the triangular zone. The picture indicates that the vehicle would be reasonable stable.
-Full load – Driver +three passanger ,coordinate:( 561.2041, 731.0204, 194.3265) in mm
Front
wheel
Center of
gravity
Rear wheel
Reference
plane(x,y,z
)
C
CHAPTER 3
MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLING PROCEDURE
3.1 Manufacturing Procedure
The word manufacturing is derived from the Latin “ manufactus”, meaning made by hand, the word
manufacturing first appeared in 1567 and the word manufacturing involves making products from
raw materials by various processes, machinery, and operations, following a well organized plane for
each activity required. The word product means something that is produced, and the word product
and production first appeared sometimes during the fifteenth century.
Manufacturing in the broadest sense, is the processes of converting raw materials in to products. It
encompasses the design and production of goods, using various productions of methods and
technology. Manufacturing is the back bone of any industrialized nation. Its importance is
emphasized by the fact that, as an economic activity, it compromise approximately one third of the
value of all goods and services produced in industrialized nations. Many processes are used to
produce parts and shapes. The broad categories of processing method for materials are;
a. Blank cutting sheet metal and tube –The cutting time for the sheet metal can be found using analytical
formula.
Cutting time= (Total pass*length/ (table speed)) +reverse time
b. Finishing face sheet metal and tube
Facing time= (Total pass*length/ (table speed)) +reverse time
operation Depth of Cutting Down Table Total Length Tracing Setup Cutting Reverse Total
cut speed feed speed pass of time time time time per time
cutting pass
cutting 2mm 25m/s .05mm 0.25m/s 40 21m 3hr 2hr 56min 1sec 5.95hr
facing .5mm 30m/s .1mm 0.25m/s 15 21m 0 2hr 25min 1sec 2.43hr
c. Drilling- Drilling must be operate at correct cutting speed and feed; the cutting and feed rate already
determining are based on the condition
The work is rigidly stamped
The machine is in good working condition
The drill is correctly selected and grounded for the being cut
Cutting speed for HSS twist steel drills
Total number of holes drilled = 12X∅40𝑚𝑚 +18X∅10𝑚𝑚+6X∅30𝑚𝑚+4X∅25𝑚𝑚
Td=L/ (n*S)
Where
Td:driiling time
n: the spindle speed in rpm
L:length or depth of the hole
S:feed rate
S/N operation Operation description Machine Depth of Cutting Meas. tool tool Remark
Tools cut(mm) speed
(m/mi)
01 cutting Blank cutting to grinder 2 1500 meter Grinding Considering the
2X115.5X241.5mm wheel allowance
02 facing Facing end grinder 0.5 1500 meter Grinding Facing all cutting
to2X115X241mm wheel face and Careful
smoothing
05 bending Bending at 900 with Sheet Meter and Use proper
width of 20mm entre the metal 900 bending force
length and radius of 3mm Bending measuring and check up the
in both end material(set perpendicularity
square)
06 assembling Assembling with drawing Meter and Soft Keeping position
no.2 water level hammer of contact and
distance ; check
the
perpendicularity
of the surfaces
with center line
of the tube
07 welding Fillet weld with drawing Arc AWS Weld based on
no.11 welding E6013 the specified size
Use AWS 6013 electrode electrode of the weld
Fillet weld meter Make uniform
size=.707thickness ,unless weld size
specified
08 finishing Facing the whole part 1800 Grinding Careful deburring
rough surface wheel
09 panting The whole surface area Spray Check up all
Painting surface is
painting
02 facing Facing end to grinder 0.5 meter Grinding Facing all cutting
2X91X1400mm wheel face and Careful
smoothing
03 drilling Drilling 3X∅42mm Drilling 2 Meter and 40mm Use coolant, feed
caliper drill twist steadily and use
proper holding
device
04 facing Removing the chips and grinder 0.1 Grinding Careful
leveling the hole wheel deburring
05 assembling Assembling with drawing Meter and Soft Keeping position
no.11c. water level hammer of contact and
distance
Place on the center line of Check
drawing no.11c. perpendicularity
of surfaces
06 welding Weld with drawing Arc AWS Weld based on
no.11c ; welding E6013 the specified size
Use AWS 6013 electrode electrode of the weld
Double Fillet weld meter Make uniform
size=2mm weld size
07 finishing Facing the whole part 1800 Grinding Careful deburring
rough surface wheel
08 panting The whole surface area Spray Check up all
Painting surface is
painting
02 facing Facing end to grinder 0.5 meter Grinding Facing all cutting
2X91X1400mm wheel face and Careful
deburring
03 rolling Roll based on the rolling Meter and check up the
specified circles protractor radius of circle
04 finishing Facing the whole part 1800 Grinding Careful deburring
rough surface wheel
05 painting The whole surface area Spray Check up all
Painting surface is
painting
Bending is a flexible process by which many different shapes can be produced. We used
bending machine, which available in the shop to bend chassis parts.
Grinding – this process uses a rotating grinding wheel which has abrasive grit particles on its
surface to remove material from a components. This process can either be automated or under
manual control.
f. Assembling –
drawing no.11c in both parts. Weld the parts in their correct positioning using double fillet
weld with size of weld 2mm.
Drawing
no.11
Drawing
no.11b
5. Keep the position the above steps of the assembling procedure using temporally two rod in the
rear and front end of the drawing no.11 to keep the distance in their specified position.
6. Inserting drawing no.2 into the ∅42𝑚𝑚 hole of drawing no.11 and offset 196mm the end of
the tube from external surface of drawing no.11. And weld with drawing no.11 inside and
outside surface using fillet weld size of 1.5mm.
Drawing no.2
Drawing
no. 3
8. Inserting drawing no.4 into inside surfaces of drawing no.11 and offset 0mm the end of the
plate from internal surfaces of drawing no.11.make sure that the position of horizontal line of
drawing no.4 is perpendicular to the bottom surface of drawing no.11b and upper surface of
drawing no.11c in both ends. Weld the parts in their correct positioning using double fillet
weld with size of weld 2mm.
Drawing
no.4
Drawing no.12
10. Insert drawing no.9 on the corner of both end connection surface drawing no.11 and drawing
no.4. Make sure that touch the ends of the part and weld using single fillet weld size of
1.5mm.
11. Connect drawing no.11 and drawing no.4 using drawing no.8 at angle of450 . And weld in
both end of the drawing no.8 with the specified connection point.
Drawing no. 8
Drawin
g no.6
13. Place drawing no.7 on the top surface of the drawing no.11b coincidence with drawing no.6
on the rear face. Weld with drawing no.6 fillet weld size 1.5mm. Make sure that both rear face
of drawing no.7 and drawing no.6 fully contact and their face parallel.
Drawing no.7
Drawing no. 1
15. Inserting drawing no. 13 into the rear right and left TWV chassis each respectively two.
Spacing 50 mm you can show on the blow figure. Weld with drawing no. 11b and drawing no.
12 double fillet size 1.5mm.
Drawing no.13
17. Inserting drawing no. 13c into the lower space between the drawing no. 13 in both end. Make
sure that the inclined lines of both drawing be parallel. Weld with this drawing in both side
single fillet weld size 1.5mm.
Drawing no.13c
1175
3.5 Material preparation cost
As we proceed to determine the cost of the TWV component from the data and formulas already seen
in the above methods, the material preparation cost of the chassis is as follows
Table 3. 20 cost analysis of the TWV chassis.
M.C Material cost
D.L.C Direct labor
M.O.H.C Manufacturing over cost
Contingency Compensation due to some error (i.e. time, cost)
Estimated production cost =the sum of the direct labor and manufacturing over head cost
= D.L.C + M.O.H.C
Grand total = the sum of the estimate production and material cost
=D.L.C + M.O.H.C + M.C
The direct labor and manufacturing over head cost of different companies are listed in the following
table
Conclusion
The main objective of this project is reverse engineering in TWV and modification in some important
aspects. These aspects are the 3D modeling, design and manufacturing of the chassis, the static and
dynamics analyses that need to be conducted on the chassis, the usage of the results in the static and
dynamics calculations and predicting the TWV performance. Total weight of the chassis is 34kg and
its capacity is 500kg. In fact, these steps may need to be repeated several times. The other aspects of
the design, such as the 3D modeling and strength design of the body, and the suspension system are
all handled by another team member, who played an important role in production also. Since this
thesis includes four month.
The detail dimensions of each part of the chassis are measured and the modeling and simulating these
part using CATIA software. In this project include modification of some part of the chassis part. The
basic part of chassis is simulating based on static and dynamic consideration.
The goal was to reduce the cost of the TWV vehicle and optimizing the weight by manufacturing
local area. The reason for that is because the TWV cost increasing continuously and this result
foreign currency expenditure.
Recommendation
To make reverse engineering on machinery it needs full calibration and experiments. So that for this
project it should be modifying using accurate calibration system and experimental analysis of
different part of the TWV.
Since the full vehicle was created with measures deriving from the first step in the design process,
measures as weights, properties, etc., were estimated. These parameters will be corrected to more
accurate values as the project proceeds and will therefore give better results in the future. As the
correct measures and weight are presented, the cube representing the centre of gravity could be
removed. Instead the weights and position of each part could be implemented, and thus adding the
effect from the mass of inertia.
APPENDIX
Detail drawing
ASSEMBLING DRAWING
MATLAB script
clc
clf
%Centre of mass calculation for full load in X-, Y-, Z-coordinates
A = [305, 500, 150]; %Coordinate for left rear passenger
B = [610, 500, 150]; %Coordinate for middle rear passenger
C = [910, 540, 150]; %Coordinate for right rear passenger
D = [460, 1440, 140]; % Coordinate for driver
E = [460, 120, -200]; %Coordinate for fuel engine
F = [577, 1120, 166]; %Coordinate for vehicle body/frame
G = [570, 230, 1100]; %Coordinate for dashboard
%Dotted plot on each part in the vehicle
plot3 (A (1), A (2), A (3),'+') %Plotting A on the plane
hold on %Keeps the plot, since it is erased after each
% run
grid on %Makes the grid visible
plot3 (B (1), B (2), B (3),'+') %Plotting B on the plane
plot3(C (1), C (2), C (3),'+') %Plotting C on the plane
plot3 (D (1), D (2), D (3),'+') %Plotting D on the plane
plot3 (E (1), E (2), E (3),'+') %Plotting E on the plane
plot3 (F (1), F (2), F (3),'+') %Plotting F on the plane
plot3 (G (1), G (2), G (3),'+') %Plotting G on the plane
%Coordinate limitation in X-, Y-, Z-direction
xlim ([0, 1240])
ylim ([0, 2500])
zlim ([-200, 1430])
%Labeling each direction
xlabel (‘Width (mm)')
ylabel (‘Length (mm)')
zlabel (‘Height (mm)')
%Weights on each part
a = 70; %Passenger
b = a; %Passenger
c = a; %Passenger
d = a; %Driver
e = 50; %Fuel engine
f = 120; %Body/frame
g =40; %Dashboard
%Total mass = 670 kg
%Equations, weight on each coordinate
aA = (a*A);
bB = (b*B);
cC = (c*C);
dD = (d*D);
eE = (e*E);
fF = (f*F);
gG = (g*G);
%Equation, centre of mass in X-, Y-, Z-plane
S = ((aA+bB+cC+dD+eE+fF+gG)/ (a+b+c+d+e+f+g));
%Plotting centre of mass on X-, Y-, Z-plane
plot3(S (1), S (2), S (3),'ro')
hold off %After each run it will terminate the previous plot
%Distances
Lv = 2500; %Length of vehicle (mm)
wb = 1900; %Wheel base (mm)
Wv = 1240; %Width of vehicle (mm)
Lm =1769; %Length to centre of mass (mm)
M = a+b+c+d+e+f+g; %Sprung mass (kg)
Wd = 920; %Distance between dampers (mm)
Lfwf = 250; %Length from front of vehicle to centre of front wheel (mm)
Llwm = 561.2; %Width from left rear wheel to centre of mass (mm)
%front spring property
Df= 55; %outside diameter of the coil (mm)
df=8; %coil diameter (mm)
end
Tables
CATIA ANALYSIS
Reference
1. R.s, khurmi- j.k. Gupta, a textbook of machine design, Eurasia publishing house Pvt. Ld,
2005, New Delhi
16. Mahindra webpage. (n.d.). Mahindra & Mahindra. Retrieved 2011-11-01 from
http://www.mahindra.com/
17. Indiacatalog.com webpage. (n.d.). Mahindra Alfa Passenger Specification. Retrieved 2011-
11-01from
http://www.indiacatalog.com/automotive_directory/mahindra_and_mahindra/mahindra_alfa_
passenger_specification.html
18. Tuk Tuk Forwarder webpage. (2008).History of Tuk Tuk Forwarder. Retrieved 2011-11-01
from
http://www.thailandtuktuk.com/history-forwerder-en/
19. Monika Motors webpage. (n.d.). History of Monika Motors. Retrieved 2011-11-01 from
http://www.monikamotors.com
20. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia