Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
WITNESS SHEET
TSE 4
Lloyd Kelsey
On behalf of On behalf of
Taylor & Stapleton Eng. Ltd.,
Fulling Mill,
Fulling Mill Lane,
Welwyn,
Herts,
AL6 9NP.
Date
Sheet 1 of 142
Taylor & Stapleton Engineering Ltd. Welwyn, Herts. AL6 9NP Tel 01438 718666 Fax 01438 718668
DATE 18/09/07
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
SYSTEM REPORT SHEET
TSE 5
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU's 1, 2, 3 & 4
This supply system comprises of four ahu’s located on the second floor plant deck. This system is generally
three ahu’s running and one stand by. Our commissioning works have been divided into three sections, the first
proportional balance of secondary grilles located on the ground floor, the second controls calibration and the
third pressure regime set up.
Secondary Balance
Prior to carrying out the proportional balance of the grilles on the ground floor, the design volume for the
required stack was set via the vcd in the plantroom and the volume measured by means of pitot traverse. Whilst
carrying out this exercise both major and minor dampers were position to fifty percent open to simulate the
operating conditions of the system. This was done, as the controls were incomplete at the time of testing.
Factors have been used on both size hoods for the supply and the extract. They are as follows:
Supply – 600 x 600 the factor was taken at grille T40/04 = 1.06
Supply – 1200 x 600 the factor is a summation of the grilles in the procedure rooms against the traverse in the
plantroom. We calculated this factor for all the procedure rooms and used the average. This was done, as
there was no other suitable location for a factor at the time of testing. = 1.15
Extract – 600 x 600 the factor was taken at grille’s E48/07 & E48/06 = 1.0
Extract – 1200 x 600 the factor was taken in the procedure rooms, using the single grille volume against the
traverse in the plantroom. . We calculated this factor for all the procedure rooms and used the average. This
was done, as there was no other suitable location for a factor at the time of testing = 1.18
These factors have been applied to the readings taken from the balometer.
Controls Calibration
The controls system operates using the following method. A single point velocity sensor measures the velocity
of the air as it passes through the duct, this velocity is then multiplied by the free area of the duct in which it is
located to calculate the volume of air passing through the stack. When testing we found that a single point
reading did not provide an accurate representation of the volume of air passing through the stack. Although the
sensors are generally located after the hepa filter this did not stabilised the flow of air, therefore a single point
reading does not give a true volume as the velocity of the air differs through out the duct.
We calibrated each sensor by measuring a volume by means of pitot traverse. We have taken the majority of
these volumes in the attenuators. We did this where we were unable to obtain a suitable test point due to the
ductwork configuration. Before measuring the volume of air at the stack we confirmed it was controlling at the
design volume via the bms. Then using the following formula we calibrated the sensor by factorising the free
area of the duct in which the sensor is located.
This ultimately would change the bms volume, we would then wait for the stack to control to the required set
point and re-measure the traverse to confirm the volume was correct.
All the factorised areas have been recorded on a separate spreadsheet please see this for further information.
Pressure Regime
The controls of the building work by supplying the required amount of air to each room, the extract will then
control to suit the design pressure in the space. Please see layout drawing for required pressures in each room.
We have then validated the pressure regime on the ground floor with our Micromanometer to confirm we are
achieving the correct room differential pressures. All of these tests have been carried out with all doors shut.
Taylor & Stapleton Engineering Ltd. Welwyn, Herts. AL6 9NP Tel 01438 718666 Fax 01438 71 8668
DATE 18/09/07
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN INSPECTION SHEET
TSE 11
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 1
FAN DETAILS DRIVE DETAILS MOTOR DETAILS
COMMENTS
Taylor & Stapleton Engineering Ltd. Welwyn, Herts. AL6 9NP Tel. 01438 718666 Fax. 01438 718668
DATE 18/09/07
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN INSPECTION SHEET
TSE 11
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 2
FAN DETAILS DRIVE DETAILS MOTOR DETAILS
COMMENTS
Taylor & Stapleton Engineering Ltd. Welwyn, Herts. AL6 9NP Tel. 01438 718666 Fax. 01438 718668
DATE 18/09/07
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN INSPECTION SHEET
TSE 11
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 1
FAN DETAILS DRIVE DETAILS MOTOR DETAILS
COMMENTS
Taylor & Stapleton Engineering Ltd. Welwyn, Herts. AL6 9NP Tel. 01438 718666 Fax. 01438 718668
DATE 18/09/07
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN INSPECTION SHEET
TSE 11
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 1
FAN DETAILS DRIVE DETAILS MOTOR DETAILS
COMMENTS
Taylor & Stapleton Engineering Ltd. Welwyn, Herts. AL6 9NP Tel. 01438 718666 Fax. 01438 718668
DATE 18/09/07
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN PERFORMANCE TEST SHEET
TSE 13
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 1
PARAMETERS
Flow grid calibrations carried out with fan fixed @ 45 Hz
Final fan test with fans running in auto @ Hz.
MOTOR No. 1 BK BR G
MOTOR No. 2 BK BR G
3.49 3.21 3.47 3.26 3.13 3.54 AVERAGE VELOCITY 3.37 m/s
3.64 3.48 3.47 3.40 3.40 3.67 TESTED DUTY 22.69 m3/s @ Pa
COMMENTS
Volume measured by means of anemometer scan inside ahu. Readings taken between heating and
cooling coil. This volume was used to calibrated ahu flow grid. Ahu fixed @ 45 Hz at time of testing.
BMS Volume after offset applied - 22.4 m3/s = 117%
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN PERFORMANCE TEST SHEET
TSE 13
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 2
PARAMETERS
Flow grid calibrations carried out with fan fixed @ 45 Hz
Final fan test with fans running in auto @ Hz.
MOTOR No. 1 BK BR G
MOTOR No. 2 BK BR G
3.53 3.20 3.44 3.45 3.28 3.32 AVERAGE VELOCITY 3.35 m/s
3.50 3.21 3.06 3.38 3.23 3.20 TESTED DUTY 22.54 m3/s @ Pa
COMMENTS
Volume measured by means of anemometer scan inside ahu. Readings taken between heating and
cooling coil. This volume was used to calibrated ahu flow grid. Ahu fixed @ 45 Hz at time of testing.
BMS Volume after offset applied - 23.4 m3/s = 122%
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN PERFORMANCE TEST SHEET
TSE 13
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 3
PARAMETERS
Flow grid calibrations carried out with fan fixed @ 45 Hz
Final fan test with fans running in auto @ Hz.
Flexible connection on fan discharge found damaged @ time of testing.
MOTOR No. 1 BK BR G
MOTOR No. 2 BK BR G
2.77 2.59 2.68 2.50 2.19 2.80 AVERAGE VELOCITY 2.61 m/s
2.79 2.79 2.73 2.47 2.30 2.87 TESTED DUTY 17.57 m3/s @ Pa
COMMENTS
Volume measured by means of anemometer scan inside ahu. Readings taken between heating and
cooling coil. This volume was used to calibrated ahu flow grid. Ahu fixed @ 45 Hz at time of testing.
BMS Volume after offset applied - 17.45 m3/s = 91%
COMMISSIONING RESULTS
FAN PERFORMANCE TEST SHEET
TSE 13
PROJECT: MRC, Project ARES SYSTEM: General Supply - AHU 4
PARAMETERS
Flow grid calibrations carried out with fan fixed @ 45 Hz
Final fan test with fans running in auto @ Hz.
MOTOR No. 1 BK BR G
MOTOR No. 2 BK BR G
3.25 3.13 3.14 3.18 3.39 3.29 AVERAGE VELOCITY 3.27 m/s
3.24 3.48 3.47 3.15 3.49 3.45 TESTED DUTY 22.03 m3/s @ Pa
Volume measured by means of anemometer scan inside ahu. Readings taken between heating and
cooling coil. This volume was used to calibrated ahu flow grid. Ahu fixed @ 45 Hz at time of testing.
BMS Volume after offset applied - 22.2 m3/s = 116%