Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 1
PETE 331 – Overview
1981-2003 TPAO
2003-2004 Çalık Energy
2005-2009 Schlumberger
2010- Consultant
Office : Z-15
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE 331 – Overview
1992-1998 METU Petroleum and Natural Gas Eng. (Turkey) Research Asst.
1998-2002 NTNU Petroleum Eng. & App. Geophys. (Norway) Research Assoc.
2000-2002 Markland Tech. (Norway) Research Engineer
2002-2012 SINTEF Marine Env. Tech. (Norway) Research Scientist
2012-2013 METU-NCC Petroleum and Natural Gas Eng. (TRNC)
2013 METU Petroleum and Natural Gas Eng.
Office : Z-13
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE 331 – Overview
Grading Summary :
Mid Term I 25 %
Mid Term II 25 %
Final Exam 30 %
Homeworks 10 %
Attendance 10 %
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE 331 – Overview
Text Books
References :
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE 331 – Overview
Software: PIPESIM* software will be used for some assignments.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 8
PETE 331 – Overview
Course Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE 331 – Overview
Simplified Schematic Production System for a
Single Flowing Oil Well Gas
T M
Water Pump
pr pbhfs pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE 331 – Overview
• Reservoir Deliverability
Flow Regimes
Inflow Performance Relationship
• Choke Performance
• Well Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 11
PETE 331 – Overview
• Sand Control
• Well Testing**
DST Application and Analysis
Measurement of Well Production Rates
* Technical Elective Course ‘PETE 434 – Well Stimulation’ covers the Acidizing
and Hydraulic Fracturing in detail.
** Methodology and Analysis for Oil and Gas Well Tests will be covered in detail
in ‘PETE 344 – Petroleum Reservoir Engineering II’ and ‘PETE 461 – Natural
Gas Engineering’ courses.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 12
PETE 331 – Overview
• Production Logging
• Well Completion
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE 331 – Overview
Course Outline:
• Reservoir Deliverability
Flow Regimes
Inflow Performance Relationship
• Choke Performance
• Well Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 16
PETE 331 – Overview
Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE 331 – Overview
Main Text:
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE 331 – Overview
time
Exploration
Discovery
Appraisal and Delineation
Development and Primary Production
Application of Enhanced Production Methods
Secondary Production (Waterflooding)
Tertiary Production (EOR)
Abandonment
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE 331 – Overview
Exploration :
• Geological and Geophysical work is performed to define the prospects
which may be containing hydrocarbons.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE 331 – Overview
• Surface Facilities are designed and constructed according to the expected oil,
gas and water production rates. The information is based on the Development
study which used the data from the drilled and tested wells.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE 331 – Overview
Abandonment
• After the economic limit is reached and production is no longer feasible, the
field is abandoned.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE 331 – Overview
Casing Heads
Surface Casing Surface Casing Head
Cement
Intermediate
Casings
Production
Casing
Cased hole 24
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE 331 – Overview
Choke Flow Line
Casing Heads
Surface Casing Surface Casing Head
Cement
Intermediate
Casings
Production String (Tubing)
Production Packer
Production
Casing
Perforations
Cased hole 25
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE 331 – Overview
Workover Rigs
Workover Rigs are cheaper and easier to operate compared to Drilling Rigs. They
can be mounted on trucks.
Their drilling capacity is limited (mostly used only for drilling cement in the wellbore)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE 331 – Overview
Completion Types
Surface Casing
Intermediate
Casings
Production Cement
Casing
Formation Damage:
Formation Damage is an important topic in Production Engineering. The damage
is caused during drilling, workover and production operations.
Permeable
Zone
Mud Cake
Invaded (Damaged)
Zone
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE 331 – Overview
Formation Damage:
The formation damage in the near wellbore is quantified with a
‘Skin Factor’.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE 331 – Overview
pr pr
Producing Well
Pressure
pbhf
re
pr re re
Damaged Well (Skin=Positive) :
pbhf
pr pr
Pressure
pbhf
re re
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE 331 – Overview
The point where the liquid and gas properties converge is called
the ‘Critical Point’.
The two phase envelop is defined by a bubble point line and a dew
point line.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE 331 – Overview
Critical Point
Pressure
Cricondenterm Point
75 %
50 %
25 %
5%
Temperature
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE 331 – Overview
Cricondenterm Point
75 %
50 %
25 %
5%
Temperature
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE 331 – Overview
Reservoir Types:
• Undersaturated Oil Reservoirs
• Saturated Oil Reservoirs
• Gas Reservoirs
• Retrograde Condensate Reservoirs
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE 331 – Overview
Cricondenterm Point
75 %
50 %
25 %
5%
Temperature
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE 331 – Overview
Oil reservoirs which have initial pressures higher than the bubble point are
called:
UNDERSATURATED OIL RESERVOIRS.
Oil reservoirs which have initial pressures lower than or at the bubble
point are called:
SATURATED OIL RESERVOIRS.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE 331 – Overview
GAS RESERVOIRS
For every temperature higher than the cricondentherm point, only one
phase (gas) exists at all pressures.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE 331 – Overview
When reservoir pressure drops below the dew point in these reservoirs,
condensate (liquid) drops out of the gas phase. As the pressure is reduced
more the condensate evaporates back into the gas phase.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 40
PETE 331 – Overview
B
Pressure
C
D
A: Reservoir Pressure & Temp.
B: Flowing Bottom hole Pressure & Temp.
C: Flowing Well head Pressure & Temp.
Temperature D: Separator Pressure & Temp.
• At the reservoir conditions (A) , only liquid phase (oil) exists. However, as the oil flows
towards the well (A to B), the pressure decreases below the bubble point, therefore gas
comes out of solution and two phase (gas and oil) flow takes place in the reservoir before it
reaches the wellbore (B).
• Moving from bottom hole (B) to wellhead (C), the pressure and temperature decrease
more and liquid (oil) percent decrease because more gas comes out of solution.
• At the separator conditions (D), the pressure and temperature is reduced more and final
gas oil ratio is reached.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE 331 – Overview
B
Pressure
C
D
A: Reservoir Pressure & Temp.
B: Flowing Bottom hole Pressure & Temp.
C: Flowing Well head Pressure & Temp.
Temperature D: Separator Pressure & Temp.
• At the reservoir conditions (A) , only liquid phase (oil) exists. As the oil flows towards the
well (A to B), the pressure decreases, but it is above the below the bubble point when it
reaches the wellbore (B). Therefore all the flow in the reservoir is single phase (oil) and
gas does not come out of solution).
• Moving from bottom hole (B) to wellhead (C), the pressure and temperature decrease
more. The well head (C) is in the two phase region, below the Bubble Point line. Therefore,
gas comes out of solution in the wellbore.
• At the separator conditions (D), the pressure and temperature is reduced more and final
gas oil ratio is reached.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE 331 – Overview
Water Drive :
Expansion Drive :
Water production is not expected Solution Gas Drive (Pres < Pbp)
Gas bubbles
since there is no aquifer. coming out of solution
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE 331 – Overview
Some Production Engineering
Issues with Expansion Drive and
Solution Gas Drive Reservoirs:
Rapid decrease in reservoir pressure reduces
well production rates. Artificial lift may be Oil
necessary early in the life of the field to
compensate for reservoir pressure decrease.
The artificial lift equipment must be designed
and operated to account for decreasing Expansion Drive (Pres > Pbp)
reservoir pressures.
Pressure maintenance operations (i.e. Water or
gas injection) must be considered .
During solution gas drive, high increase is Oil
expected in gas rates (Gas Oil Ratios). The
surface facilities, artificial lift equipment must
be designed to handle high GOR.
High gas production with oil may cause
foaming problems with high gravity oil. Solution Gas Drive (Pres < Pbp)
Gas bubbles
coming out of solution
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE 331 – Overview
Gravity Drive :
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE 331 – Overview
Combination Drive :
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE 331 – Overview
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Recovery Efficiency, % OOIP
(figure from Satter and Thakur, 1994)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 55
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 56
PETE 331 Simplified Schematic Production System for a Flowing Oil Well
Gas
T M
Water Pump
pr pbhfs pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 57
PETE 331 Simplified Schematic Production System for a Flowing Oil Well
Gas
Choke
T M
Water Pump
Pressure Losses in the System:
Dp1 = pr – pbhfs .... Loss in Reservoir
Dp2 = pbhfs – pbhf .... Loss in Near Wellbore & Completions
Dp3 = pbhf – pwhf .... Loss in Tubing (Vertical Flow)
Dp4 = pwhf – psep .... Loss in Flowline
Dp5 = psep – pst .... Loss in Transfer line
S Dp = pr – pst .... Total Pressure Loss
pr = Reservoir pressure
pbhfs = Bottom hole flowing pressure near wellbore
pr pbhfs pbhf = Bottom hole flowing pressure
pbhf pwhf = Wellhead flowing pressure
psep = Separator pressure
pst = Stock Tank pressure
Ppl = Pipeline Pressure
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 58
PETE 331 Simplified Schematic Pressure Profile for a Production System
(Natural Flow)
pwhf Intake
Pressure Loss Pressure
due to Wellbore
Damage &
Completions
(Skin) psep pst
pwhf pwhf
q q
p pbhf p pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 60
PETE 331 Introduction to Petroleum Production Systems
Simplified Schematic Pressure Profile for Production System (Natural Flow-
Example for Decreasing Reservoir Pressure with Time):
P1 (Initial Pressure)
Pwhf 1
P2 (Final Pressure)
Pbhf 2
Pwhf 2 psep pst
pr
pbhfs Pressure increased by the
pbhf downhole pump of the
artificial lift system
Pressure
psep pst
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 63
PETE 331 – Overview
• Reservoir
• Wellbore
Perforation
Sand Control Systems
Production String
Artificial Lift Equipment
• Surface Equipment
Wellhead
Christmas Tree
Chokes
Manifolds
Separators
Metering Systems
Pump
Compressor
Pipeline
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 64
PETE 331 – Overview
Reservoir
Darcy’s Equation simplified for radial, single phase, pseudo steady state flow:
q J p pbhf
pbhf= bottom hole flowing pressure, psia
Drawdown
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 65
PETE 331 – Overview
Surface Equipment - Wellhead
Wellhead is defined as the surface equipment below the master valve of the
christmas tree.
It includes:
• Casing Heads
• Tubing Head
• Casing Valves
• Pressure Gauges
Christmas tree is used to control the flow rate from the well.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 67
(figure from Guo et al, 2007)
PETE 331 – Overview
Horizontal – Most commonly used. Low cost. Higher efficiency for high GOR,
foaming wells and oil/water separation. Easier to install and service.
Vertical – Used for medium or low GOR wells and
slugging wells. Occupy less floor space,
advantageous for offshore platforms.
Spherical – Inexpensive and compact. Limited
efficiency for surging wells and liquid settling
action.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 68
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 69
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 70
PETE 331 – Overview
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 71
PETE 331 – Overview
The role of the production engineer is to maximize oil and gas production in a
cost effective manner.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 72
PETE 331 – Overview
Role and Tasks of the Production Engineer in Reservoir
Management
• Assessing the need for well stimulation and preparation of stimulation programs
acid treatments
hydraulic fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 74
PETE 331 – Overview
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 75
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Course Outline:
• Reservoir Deliverability
Flow Regimes
Inflow Performance Relationship
• Choke Performance
• Well Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
Reservoir Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Objective:
• Understand the flow regimes in the reservoir and review the equations
which describe the fluid flow for each flow regime.
• Learn how to generate the Inflow Performance Curve for single phase
and two phase flow in the reservoir.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Main Text:
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Reservoir Deliverability is :
Oil or gas production rate which the reservoir can deliver at a given
bottom hole flowing pressure.
Important:
Reservoir Deliverability alone does not tell how much the well can
produce. It only gives the flow capacity of the reservoir into the wellbore.
The well deliverability and the coupling of the well deliverability with
reservoir deliverability will be covered in future lectures.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE – 331 Simplified Schematic Production System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
Gas
M
T
psp Oil pst Sales
Separator
pwhf M Stock Tank
Water Pump
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
• Use the correct equation derived for the specific flow regime
that takes place in the flow period we are investigating, in our
engineering calculations.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 8
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Flow Regimes
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 11
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
• Transient Flow
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 12
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Transient Flow:
Flow regime where the radius of pressure wave propagation from
wellbore has not reached any boundaries of the reservoir.
p
f (t )
t1t2 t3 t
At any point within the radius of
wave propagation (also called radius
of investigation), the pressure is
changing (decreasing) as a function
of time.
(Transient flow regime is valid until the
first boundary is reached, at time = t3)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Transient Flow:
For single phase oil flow in the reservoir, following analytical solution is
used for describing the transient flow period.
The equation gives the bottom hole flowing pressure of the well ‘pbhf’,
when the well is producing oil with a constant flow rate ‘q’.
162.6qBo o k
pbhf pi log t log 3.23 0.87 S
kh o ct rw 2
where
pbhf = Flowing bottom hole pressure of the well, psia porosity, fraction
pi = Initial reservoir pressure, psia ct = total compressibility
q = Oil production rate, stb/d rw = wellbore radius to sandface, ft
o = Viscosity of oil, cp S = skin factor
k = effective horizontal permeability to oil, md Log = 10 based logarithm
h = reservoir thickness, ft
t = flow time, hour
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Transient Flow:
Oil wells are normally operated with constant bottom hole pressure (or
constant well head pressure), rather than constant rate. Therefore, it is
more convenient to use an equation which gives the oil production rate
for a constant bottom hole pressure.
kh pi pbhf
q
k
162.6 Bo o log t log 3 . 23 0 . 87 S
o ct rw 2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Transient Flow:
khm pi m pbhf
qg
k
1638T log t log 3.23 0.87 S
o ct rw 2
where qg = Gas Production rate, Mscf/d
T = Temperature, oR
z = Gas compressibility factor
m(p) = Real gas pseudo-pressure defined as: p
m p
2p
pb z dp
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 16
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Steady-State Flow:
Flow regime after the transient flow period is finished, if the radius of
pressure wave propagation from wellbore has reached a constant
pressure boundary.
During steady state flow, pressure at any point in the reservoir remains
constant.
p
zero
t
At any point within the drainage
radius of the well, the pressure is
constant (does not change with
time).
Sketch of a reservoir with constant pressure boundary (figure from Guo et al, 2007)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Steady-State Flow:
Examples for Constant Pressure Boundaries:
The constant pressure boundary may be because of an aquifer (water
influx) or water/gas injection wells which maintain a constant pressure
at the well’s drainage boundaries.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Steady-State Flow:
For steady state flow condition because of a circular constant pressure
boundary at a distance re from the wellbore, the following relation can be
used for single phase oil flow :
kh pe pbhf
q re
re
141.2 Bo o ln S pe
rw
pbhf
‘ln’ is natural logarithm.
Pseudo-Steady-State Flow:
Flow regime after the transient flow period is finished and the radius of
pressure wave propagation from wellbore has reached all of the no flow
boundaries.
Decrease of pressure
with time
Sketch of a reservoir with no flow boundaries (figure from Guo et al, 2007)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Pseudo-Steady-State Flow:
A ‘No Flow’ boundary can be a sealing fault, pinch out of pay zone or
boundaries of the drainage areas of production wells.
Sealing fault
Pinchout
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Pseudo-Steady-State Flow:
Examples for No-Flow (Drainage)
Boundaries:
(figure from Matthew and Russel, Pressure Build-up and Flow Tests in Wells, 1967)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Pseudo-Steady-State Flow:
For pseudo steady state flow condition because of a circular no-flow
boundary at a distance re from the wellbore, the following relation can be
used for single phase oil flow :
kh pe pbhf
q
re 1 re
141.2 Bo o ln S
rw 2 pe
pbhf
‘ln’ is natural logarithm.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Pseudo-Steady-State Flow:
Because the pe is not known at any given time, the following expression
using the average reservoir pressure is more useful:
q
kh p pbhf
r 3 where p = average reservoir pressure, psia
141.2 Bo o ln e S
rw 4
If a gas well is located at the center of a circular drainage area with no-flow
boundaries, the equation for the pseudo-steady state flow is:
qg
kh m p m pbhf
r 3 where D = non-Darcy flow coefficient, d/Mscf
1,424T ln e S Dq g
rw 4
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 24
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Pseudo-Steady-State Flow:
q
kh p pbhf
1 4A
141.2 Bo o ln S
2 C A rw
2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Shape Factors (CA) for different Reservoir Shapes and Well Locations:
Horizontal Wells:
The transient flow, steady state flow and pseudo-steady state flow can also
exist in reservoirs penetrated by horizontal wells.
Most widely used relationship for the flow equation was presented by Joshi
(1988) for steady state flow of oil in the horizontal plane and pseudo-steady
state flow in the vertical plane:
k H h pe pbhf
q
a a 2 L / 2 2 I h I h
141.2 B ln ani ln
ani
rw I ani 1
L/2 L
where
L 1 1 re 4 where
a H
2 2 4 L/2 kH = average horizontal permeability, md
kV = vertical permeability, md
kH reH = radius of drainage area, ft
I ani
kV L = length of horizontal borehole
(L/2<0.9reH),ft
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 27
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Stabilization Time:
Flow time required for the radius of the pressure wave to reach the
circular boundary.
where ts = time for the end of transient flow period, hrs
oct re 2
ts 1,200
= porosity, fraction
o = oil viscosity, cp
k ct = total compressibility, psia-1
re = effective drainage radius, ft
k = permeability, md
In determining the stabilized bottom hole flowing pressure (pbhf) for a well
corresponding to a flow rate, the flow rate must be maintained until the
producing time exceeds the stabilization time (until the transient flow period
is finished).
If the stabilization time is not reached, the measured bottom hole flowing
pressure will be higher than the stabilized pressure. This will give optimistic
results for the calculated productivity index of the well.
Note: ts applies only to circular drainage-area (it can be different for others).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 28
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Flow Periods:
Change of bottom hole pressure with time for constant flow rate:
Flow Rate
0
Time
Bottom Hole Pressure
pr Steady State p
zero
Flow t
0
Time
No Flow Transient p Pseudo-Steady p
f (t ) Constant
Flow Period t State Flow t
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 29
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Producing Well
pr
pr
re
pr pbhf
pbp
re re
pbhf
Average Reservoir Pressure and Bottom Hole Flowing Pressure are above the
Bubble Point Pressure.
Therefore, second phase (gas) does not come out of solution. All of the flow is
single phase liquid.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
C
D A: Reservoir Pressure & Temp.
B: Flowing Bottom hole Pressure & Temp.
C: Flowing Well head Pressure & Temp.
D: Separator Pressure & Temp.
Temperature
• At the reservoir conditions (A) , only liquid phase (oil) exists. As the oil flows towards the
well (A to B), the pressure decreases, but it is still above the below the bubble point when it
reaches the wellbore (B). Therefore all the flow in the reservoir is single phase (oil) and
gas does not come out of solution).
• Moving from bottom hole (B) to wellhead (C), the pressure and temperature decrease
more. The well head (C) is in the two phase region, below the Bubble Point line. Therefore,
gas comes out of solution in the wellbore.
• At the separator conditions (D), the pressure and temperature is reduced more and final
gas oil ratio is reached.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
IPR for Single (Liquid) Phase Reservoirs:
In undersaturated oil reservoirs, if the pressure does not fall below the bubble
point in the reservoir and at the bottom hole, single phase (oil) flow takes
place every where in the reservoir, including the near wellbore area.
In such systems, Productivity Index can be defined for radial transient flow
around a vertical well as:
q kh
J
pi pbhf
162.6 Bo o log t log
k
3.23 0.87 S
o ct rw 2
q kh
J
pe pbhf r
141 .2 Bo o ln e S
rw
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
For pseudo steady state flow around a vertical well in a circular drainage area:
q kh
J
p pbhf r 3
141 .2 Bo o ln e S
rw 4
For pseudo steady state flow around a vertical well in a non-circular drainage area:
q kh
J
p pbhf 1
141.2 Bo o ln
4A
S
2 C A rw
2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
For steady state flow in horizontal plane and pseudo steady state flow in
vertical plane around a horizontal well :
q kH h
J
pe pbhf 2 L / 22 I h I h
141.2 B ln ani ln
ani
rw I ani 1
L/2 L
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
4000
3000
The magnitude of the inverse slope of
2000 the IPR curve gives the Productivity
1000
Index (PI or J).
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
qo (stb/day)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
pbhf re re
Average Reservoir Pressure and Bottom Hole Flowing Pressure are below the
Bubble Point Pressure.
Therefore, second phase (gas) always exists in the reservoir. All of the flow in
the reservoir is two phase (Oil + Gas).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
When two phase flow takes place, the oil rate is less than the oil rate
for single phase (oil) flow because:
1. Free gas occupies some portion of the pore space and this
reduces the oil flow (reduced oil relative permeability).
2. As the gas leaves the oil, the remaining oil becomes heavier (more
viscous) and it is more difficult to flow.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
4000
1000
Decrease in qo due to
two phase flow.
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
qo (stb/day) 40
40
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
5000
pbhf (psia)
4000
3000
2000
AOF
1000
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
qo (stb/day)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
n
pbhf
2
q qmax 1
p
or,
q C p pbhf
2
2 n
qmax
Where C and n are empirical constants and: C
p 2 n
Fetkovich’s Equation is more accurate than Vogel’s equation for IPR
modeling and prediction. The Fetkovich equation is mostly used for gas
reservoir while the Vogel equation is suitable for oil reservoirs.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
pr pr
pbp
re
pr pbhf
pbhf re re
Therefore, there are two regions in the reservoir. Before the pressure falls below the
bubble point pressure, one phase exists in the reservoir. After the pressure falls
below the bubble point, gas comes out of oil and there is two phase (oil+gas) flow.
44
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 44
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
B
Pressure
C
75 % D A: Reservoir Pressure & Temp.
25 % B: Flowing Bottom hole Pressure & Temp.
50 % 5%
C: Flowing Well head Pressure & Temp.
D: Separator Pressure & Temp.
Temperature
• At the reservoir conditions (A) , only liquid phase (oil) exists. However, as the oil flows
towards the well (A to B), the pressure decreases below the bubble point, therefore gas
comes out of solution and two phase (gas and oil) flow takes place in the reservoir before it
reaches the wellbore (B).
• Moving from bottom hole (B) to wellhead (C), the pressure and temperature decrease
more and liquid (oil) percent decrease because more gas comes out of solution.
• At the separator conditions (D), the pressure and temperature is reduced more and final
gas oil ratio is reached.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
If the reservoir pressure is above the bubble point pressure but the flowing
bottom hole pressure is below the bubble point pressure, some of the flow in
the reservoir is single phase (oil), but some of the flow is two phase (oil+gas).
In such reservoirs, the linear (one phase) IPR line can be combined with
Vogel’s IPR model for the two phase flow .
According to the linear IPR model, the flow rate at bubble point is:
qbp J * ( p pbp )
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 46
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
The reduction in oil rate makes the IPR curve deviate from the linear
trend after the bubble point pressure is reached.
4000
pr > pbp
3000
pbp
2000
1000
pr < pbp
0 Decrease in qo due to
0 200 400 600 800 1000 two phase flow.
qo (stb/day)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Based on Vogel’s IPR model, the additional flow rate caused by a pressure
drop below the bubble point pressure is expressed as:
2
𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓
∆𝑞 = 𝑞𝑣 1 − 0.2 − 0.8
𝑃𝑏𝑝 𝑃𝑏𝑝
Therefore, the flow rate when the bottom hole flowing pressure (pbhf) is less
than the bubble point pressure (𝑃𝑏𝑝 ) is expressed as:
2
𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓
𝑞 = 𝑞𝑝𝑏 + 𝑞𝑣 1 − 0.2 − 0.8
𝑃𝑏𝑝 𝑃𝑏𝑝
The final equation for the flow rate, when the bottom hole flowing pressure
(𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓 ) is less than the bubble point pressure (𝑃𝑏𝑝 ) becomes:
∗𝑃 2
𝐽 𝑏𝑝 𝑃 𝑏ℎ𝑓 𝑃 𝑏ℎ𝑓
𝑞 = 𝐽∗ 𝑃 − 𝑃𝑝𝑏 + 1 − 0.2 − 0.8
1.8 𝑃𝑏𝑝 𝑃𝑏𝑝
Since
𝐽∗ 𝑃𝑏𝑝
𝑞𝑣 = & 𝑞𝑝𝑏 = 𝐽∗ 𝑃 − 𝑃𝑝𝑏
1.8
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
pi
qbp J * p pbp
J * pb
pbp
qv
pbhf 1.8
qb AOF
q
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
The IPR curves can be theoretically constructed using reservoir, fluid and
well parameters such as:
Most of the time, these parameters are not available and need to be
estimated.
Therefore, most reliable method to obtain IPR relations is using actual well
test data where the well is produced at different rates and the stabilized
bottom hole flowing pressures are recorded.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
𝑞1
𝐽∗ =
𝑃 − 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
When the tested bottom hole flowing pressure is above the bubble point
pressure (single phase flow):
𝑞1
𝐽∗ =
𝑃 − 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1
When the tested bottom hole flowing pressure is below the bubble point
pressure, but the reservoir pressure is above Pbp (partial two phase flow):
𝑞1
𝐽∗ =
2
𝑃𝑏𝑝 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1
𝑃 − 𝑃𝑏𝑝 + 1.8 1 − 0.2 𝑃 − 0.8 𝑃
𝑏𝑝 𝑏𝑝
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Since the reservoir pressure below the bubble point pressure, the maximum
value of reservoir deliverability can be obtained:
𝑞1
𝑞𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2
𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1
1 − 0.2 − 0.8
𝑃 𝑃
2
𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓
𝑞 = 𝑞𝑚𝑎𝑥 1 − 0.2 − 0.8
𝑃 𝑃
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 53
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
If Fetkovich’s equation is used, two test points are required for determining
the values of the two model constant:
𝑞
log 𝑞1
2
𝑛= 2
𝑃2 − 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1
log 2 2
𝑃 − 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓2
and
𝑞1
𝐶= 𝑛
2
𝑃2 − 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1
where 𝑞1 and 𝑞2 are the tested production rates at tested bottom hole flowing
pressures, 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓1 and 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓2 respectively.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 54
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
The observed well flow rate is based on the contribution of each layer,
depending on their rock and fluid properties and pressures.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 55
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
pbhf
C A B
q
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 56
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Composite IPR
(A+B+C)
pbhf
C A B
q
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 57
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Example for Cross Flow between Reservoir Layers:
Example 3
pbhf
B PrB=1500 psi JB= 0.6 stb/d/psi
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 58
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
or
where i = density of the fluid from/into layer i
n
q wh qwh
qi = flow rate from/into layer i
i i wh = density of fluid at wellhead
i 1 qwh = flow rate at wellhead
n = number of layers
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 59
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Ignoring density change from bottom hole to wellhead, the previous equation
reduces to:
n
qi qwh
i 1
(Total well production rate is the summation of
production rates from individual layers)
or,
J p
n
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 60
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
n
i p i pbhf qwh
J *
i 1
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 61
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
J i pi
2
n *
pbhf pbhf
1 0.2
p
0.8
p
qwh
i 1 1.8
i i
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 62
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
(Under Saturated reservoirs - Reservoir Pressure is above the bubble point but
bottom hole flowing pressure is below the bubble point. Both single and two
phase flow takes place in the reservoir).
pbhf pbhf
2
*
pbpi
n
J i p i pbpi
1.8
1 0.2
p
0.8
p
qwh
i 1
bpi bpi
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 63
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Reservoir deliverability declines with time for transient flow and pseudo
steady state flow regimes.
If the reservoir pressure is reduced below the bubble point, gas comes out of
solution and two phase flow begins. This decreases the relative permeability
to oil and also increases the oil viscosity, impairing oil mobility.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 64
PETE – 331 Reservoir Deliverability
Vogel’s Method:
k ro k ro
Bo o f B
*
* o o f
Jf
or Jf
*
Jp
Jp
*
k ro k ro
Bo o p Bo o p
Jf pf
2
*
pbhf pbhf
q 1 0.2 0.8 where Jp* = Present Productivity Index
1 .8 p p Jf* = Future Productivity Index
f f pf = Reservoir Pressure in a
future time
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 65
PETE - 331
Homework 1:
To be Submitted to:
Teaching Assistant Gökhan Mamak (Room:Z-31) or Selin Güven (Room:110)
50% will be deducted for late submission. Moreover anyone who gets
caught collaborating on the assignment will get zero.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 66
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 3
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Course Outline:
• Reservoir Deliverability
Flow Regimes
Inflow Performance Relationship
• Wellbore Performance
• Choke Performance
• Well Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE - 331
Wellbore Performance
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance
Objective:
• Learn the methodology for calculating the pressure along the wellbore
for single and multiphase systems
• Study the correlations for single and multiphase flow through chokes
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance
Main Text:
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE 331 – Simplified Schematic Production System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
CHOKE Gas
T M
Water Pump
WELLBORE
pr pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE 331 – Simplified Schematic Production System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
pwhf pdownstream
Choke Performance:
CHOKE
Relation between q, pwhf, pdownstream
pr pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance
• Multiphase Wells
Homogeneous Flow Models
Separated Flow Models
Pressure Traverse Curves
• Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 8
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
gc 2gc gc D
where
p = pressure drop, lbf/ft2
p pPE pKE pF p1 = pressure at point 1, lbf/ft2
Potential Kinetic Friction p2 = pressure at point 2, lbf/ft2
Energy Energy Term g = gravitational acceleration, 32.17 ft/s2
Term Term gc = unit conversion factor, 32.17 lbm-ft/lbf-s2
fluid density, lbm/ft3
z = elevation increase, ft
u = fluid velocity, ft/s
2 fF = Fanning friction factor
L = tubing length, ft
L D = tubing inner diameter, ft
z
q Equation can be used for liquid (oil and/or
water) flow.
1 Note: Oil and water are slightly compressible.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
pPE accounts for the pressure change due to the elevation change in the pipe.
pKE accounts for the pressure change due to the velocity change in the pipe.
D2
The velocity difference is because of the change in the pipe diameter, D.
u2 2
It is zero for a pipe with no diameter change.
pF accounts for the pressure change due to the friction in the pipe.
D2
The frictional pressure drop is given as:
u2 2
2 f F u 2 L L
pF
gc D
q
fF is the Fanning Friction Factor, which is a function of:
u1
• Reynolds Number 1
D1
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
Du
N Re
1.48q 20,100qg g g
For Liquids: N Re For Gases: N Re
D D
where q = liquid flow rate, bbl/day
qg = gas flow rate, MMscf/day
liquid density, lbm/ft3
gg = specific gravity of gas with respect to air (MW of gas / 29.0)
D = tubing inner diameter, inches
liquid or gas viscosity, cp
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
Viscous forces dominate. There is little mixing of the flowing fluid. Velocity profile
is parabolic.
16
• Friction factor is only a function of NRe : fF
N Re
Turbulent Flow ( NRe > 2,000 ) :
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
Relative Roughness:
Dimensionless variable to quantify the roughness of the pipe inner surface.
relative roughness
where
Absolute roughness of pipe wall, inches
D D = pipe inner diameter, inches
Flow
D
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 16
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
Relative Roughness:
Relative Roughness can be calculated using the absolute roughness
data of the pipe material (as given in below table) for new pipes:
For used pipes, the relative roughness value will change (it will increase with
time) because of increased roughness due to scaling, corrosion, wear etc.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
After Calculating the Reynolds number and pipe roughness, the Fanning friction
factor can be obtained either from Moody’s Friction Factor Graph, or from
empirical correlations.
If Moody’s Chart is used, the following relation is used to calculate the Fanning
Friction Factor:
fM
fF where fF = Fanning Friction Factor (used for calculating
4 the frictional pressure drop, pF)
fM = Moody’s Friction Factor (obtained from Moody’s graph)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
(from wikipedia)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
16
fF
N Re
1
5.0452 1.1098
7.149
0.8981
4 log log
fF 3.7065 N Re 2.8257 N Re
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance –Single Phase (Liquid) Wells
1. Calculate NRe.
2 f F u 2 L
pF
gc D
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Most wells produce oil, gas and water. In most oil wells, the well head flowing
pressure is below the bubble point. So, gas comes out of solution in the reservoir
or in the wellbore. Water production is also expected if movable water (interstitial
water or aquifer) exist in the reservoir.
The pressure loss equations for single flow are not valid for multiphase wells.
Multiphase is more complicated than single phase flow because, based on the
liquid and gas ratios and velocities, different flow regimes can exist in the
pipeline.
The type of the flow regime affects the pressure gradient in the tubing, so it is
important to understand the flow regime which exists in the tubing, in order to
calculate the flowing pressures in the tubing.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Four Main flow regimes are identified in gas-liquid two phase flow in Vertical Pipes:
• Bubble Flow
• Slug Flow
Liquid Gas
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 24
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
• Slug Flow
• Annular Flow
Photographs from:
http://www.pe.utexas.edu/2phaseweb/flowtwo.html
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 27
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Main flow regimes identified in gas-liquid two phase flow in Vertical Pipes: (1/2)
• Bubble Flow:
• Slug Flow:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 28
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Main flow regimes identified in gas-liquid two phase flow in Vertical Pipes: (2/2)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 29
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
qG
usG where usL = liquid superficial velocity
A usG = gas superficial velocity
qL = liquid rate
qG = gas rate
A = flow area
(Govier and Aziz, 1977)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
These maps relate the flow regimes to flow rates of each phase, fluid
properties and pipe size.
Duns and Ros Flow Regime map correlates the flow regime with two
dimensionless numbers, NvL and NvG.
L
N vL usL 4 where NvL = liquid velocity number
g NvG = gas velocity number
usL = liquid superficial velocity
usG = gas superficial velocity
L = liquid density
L
N vG usG 4 g = gravitational acceleration
g = interfacial tension of the gas-liquid system
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
NvL
NvG
(Duns and Ros, 1963)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
• Multiphase Wells
Homogeneous Flow Models
Separated Flow Models
Pressure Traverse Curves
• Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
• Multiphase Wells
Homogeneous Flow Models
Separated Flow Models
Pressure Traverse Curves
• Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Poettman and Carpenter’s (1952) equation for 3 phase (oil, gas, water) flow
in a vertical tubing (neglecting liquid holdup and acceleration):
and
2
f 2 F qo M 2 where f2F = Fanning friction factor for two phase flow
k qo = oil production rate, stb/day
7.4137x1010 D 5 M = total mass associated with 1 stb of oil
D = tubing inner diameter, ft
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Fanning friction factor for two phase flow (f2F) can be estimated from
charts recommended by Poetmann and Carpenter (1952), or the following
correlation developed by Guo and Ghalambor (2002) can be used:
f 2 F 101.4442.5log(Dn
1.4737105 Mqo
(Dn
D
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
M
Vm
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
and:
14.7 T z
Vm 5.615(Bo WORB w (GOR Rs
p 520 1.0
where
Bo = Formation volume factor of oil, rb/stb
Bw = Formation volume factor of water, rb/bbl
WOR = producing water-oil ratio, bbl/stb
GOR = producing gas-oil ratio, scf/stb
Rs = Solution gas oil ratio, scf/stb
p = in situ pressure, psia
T = in situ temperature, deg R
z = gas compressibility factor at p and T
To find the pressure drop in the tubing string for deep wells, the tubing string
length should be divided into small segments and Poettman and Carpenter’s
model should be applied to each segment sequentially.
This will increase the accuracy of the result.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 40
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Algorithm:
Input: Pwh , D, q L , GLR, WC , API , g w , g g , y H 2 S , yCO2 , y N 2 , Bw , Twh , Tbh , L
Begin Loop i = 1, N
Calculate Ti
Set P* = Pi-1
Repeat
Set Pi = P*
Calculate Sol’n Gas-Oil Ratio, Rs = f(Pi,Ti,Gg,API)
Calculate Gas Compressibility Factor, Z = f(Pi,Ti,Gg)
Calculate Oil Formation Vol. Factor, Bo = f(Ti,Rs,Gg,Go)
Calculate vol per STB oil, Vm=f(Pi,Ti,Zi,Boi,Rsi,...)
Calculate fluid (mixture) density, M Vm Set it to ri
Calculate average fluid density ravg = (ri+ri-1)/2
Calculate Inertial force (Drv), friction factor
Calculate friction term k
Calculate pressure increment, ∆P
Set P* = Pi-1+∆P
Until P* is close enough to Pi
Report depth and Pi
End Loop
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
• Multiphase Wells
Homogeneous Flow Models
Separated Flow Models
Pressure Traverse Curves
• Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Many separated flow methods exist in the literature for predicting pressure
drop in multiphase flow conditions.
Some examples for Seperated Flow Models: Hagedorn and Brown, Duns
and Ros, Beggs and Brill. Each method has its advantages and limitations.
One of the most commonly used methods is the Modified Hagedorn Brown
method.
The Hagedorn Brown method was originally presented in 1965. The modified
method improved the liquid holdup approach of the original method.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 44
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
The original Hagedorn Brown equation for calculating the pressure drop
for multiphase flow in a pipe:
dp g
2 f u
F m
um
2
( 2
dz g c gc D 2 g c z
This equation can be re-written in oil field units as:
dp
144
fF M 2
um ( 2 where M = total mass flow rate, lbm/d
= in situ average density, lbm/ft3
dz 7.413x1010 D5 2 g c z um = mixture velocity, ft/s
This is because the density difference causes dense phase (liquid phase in
gas/liquid multiphase systems) to slip down in an upward flow.
The denser phase (liquid) is ‘held up’ in the pipe relative to the lighter phase
(gas).
Liquid holdup depends on flow regime, fluid properties, pipe size and configuration.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Step 4 : Using the calculated value in Step 3, find ‘’Holdup Factor/y’’ (yL/y)
from the below graph
N vL p 0.1 (CN L
0.575 0.1
N vG pa N D
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
0.38
N vG N L
Step 5 : Calculate 2.14 and read y from below graph:
ND
0.38
N vG N L
ND
2.14 (from Hagedorn and Brown, 1965)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Using correlations instead of the graphs makes it easier to code the modified
Hagedorn and Brown method for computer applications.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
The modified Hagedorn-Brown method uses the Griffith Correlation for the
bubble flow regime.
lG < LB
where
u um 2 Note : If the calculated LB is < 0.13,
lG SG and LB 1.071 0.2218
use LB = 0.13
um D
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Neglecting the kinetic energy pressure drop term, the Griffith correlation can be
expressed in oilfield units as:
2
dp f F mL
144
7.413x1010 D L y L
5 2
dz
The Reynolds number used to obtain the friction factor is based on in situ
average liquid velocity: 2
2.2 x10 mL
N Re
D L
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 53
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
• Multiphase Wells
Homogeneous Flow Models
Separated Flow Models
Pressure Traverse Curves
• Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 54
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 55
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 56
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Multiphase Wells
Example for calculating bottom hole flowing pressure using Pressure Traverse Curves:
Solution:
• Multiphase Wells
Homogeneous Flow Models
Separated Flow Models
Pressure Traverse Curves
• Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 58
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 59
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Single Phase (Gas) Wells
dp g f M u 2 dL qg L z=L Cosq
dZ 0
gc 2 g c Di
1
(Kinetic Energy term is usually neglected)
Since gas is compressible, density () and velocity (u) are functions of P and T.
Substituting the following into Energy equation:
4qsc zPscT
29g g P u
pDi 2Tsc P
dZ cosqdL zRT
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 60
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Single Phase (Gas) Wells
zRT dP g 8 f M qsc Psc zT
2 2 2
cosq 2 2 dL 0
29g g P gc p g c Di Tsc P
5
Two methods are used for calculating pressure drop in single phase gas
wells:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 61
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Single Phase (Gas) Wells
Integrating the Energy Equation for single phase, compressible fluids and
substituting in average values for z and T gives:
P1 Exp(s P2
2 2
p 2 g c Di 5Tsc 2 cos q
where Note: Exp(s)=es
58g g gL cosq
s
g c R zT
T = ( T1 +T2) / 2
z = ( z1 +z2 ) / 2
Psc = pressure at standard conditions
Tsc = temperature at standard conditions
qsc = gas flow rate at standard conditions
Note: Standard P and T commonly used in oil industry = 14.7 psi, 60 deg F or 1 Atm, 15 deg C*
* Different values for standard P and T may be adopted by different Organizations
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 62
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Single Phase (Gas) Wells
For oil field units (qsc in Mscf/d) and substituting values for Psc, Tsc the
equations can be written as:
Pwhf
Exp(s 1 f M qsc
4 2 2 2 2
P1 Exp(s P2
2 2 6.67 x10 z T
Di cos q
5
q
and Note: Exp(s)=es
qg
0.0375g g L cosq L
s
zT Pbhf 1
P2 Exp( s P1
2 2
Di cos q
5
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 63
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Single Phase (Gas) Wells
or,
If turbulent flow is assumed (which is the case for most gas wells, because
of low gas viscosity and high gas flow velocities) following empirical
equations can be used (Katz and Lee 1990) :
0.01750
fM 0.224
for Di =< 4.277 in
Di
0.01603
fM 0.164 for Di > 4.277 in
Di
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 64
PETE 331 – Wellbore Performance – Single Phase (Gas) Wells
Exp(s 1 f M qsc
4 2 2 2
P1 Exp(s P2
2 2 6.67 x10 z T
Di cosq
5
Pwhf
This equation can not be solved directly for P1, because the 2
average gas compressibility value ( z ) is also a function of
P1. q
The longer the pipe segment, the larger will be the error due to this
averaging. Therefore, the total tubing length is divided into segments to
improve the accuracy of the results.
Exp(s 1 f M qsc
4 2 2 2
P1 Exp(s P2
2 2 6.67 x10 z T 7 Pwhf
Di cosq
5
6 2
To calculate the bottom hole flowing pressure (Pbhf) if 5
well head flowing pressure (Pwhf) is given: 4 q
3
1. Divide the tubing into a number of segments to qg L
increase accuracy. 2
2. P7 is known (Pwhf). Estimate P6 and calculate z, 1
1
for Pavg=(P7+P6)/2
Pbhf
3. Calculate P6 from above equation
4. Compare estimated P6 to calculated P6. If the difference is large, use calculated
P6 to recalculate z.
5. Using new z value, calculate P6 again.
6. Repeat steps 4 and 5 until the difference between estimated P6 and calculated
P6 is small.
7. After finishing the calculation for P6, repeat steps 2 to 6 to calculate
P5 ,P4 ,P3, P2 and finally P1 (bottom hole flowing pressure).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 66
PETE - 331
Choke Performance
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 67
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 68
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Main Text:
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 69
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 70
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
• Decreasing gas oil ratio by increasing flow pressure and staying above
the bubble point pressure.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 71
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
2. Adjustable chokes
• Easier to operate
• No need to stop flow when changing choke sizes
• Not as accurate as positive chokes
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 72
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Choke bean
Cross section
of Choke bean:
Adjustable Chokes:
Shaft
Cone
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 74
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
When the fluid flow velocity in a choke reaches the travelling velocity of
sound, the flow is called ‘’Sonic Flow’’.
At this velocity, the critical flow condition is reached. At sonic flow (critical
flow conditions) the fluctuations in downstream pressure (p2) has got no
effect on the upstream pressure (p1).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 75
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Upstream Downstream
q d1 q
d2
p1 p2 pdn
At critical flow conditions, the flow rate is only a function of the upstream
or tubing pressure.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 77
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
The ratio of down stream and upstream pressures for achieving critical
flow conditions is given as:
k
p2 2 k 1
where k= Specific heat ratio, (Cp/Cv)
p1 critical k 1
For natural gases, k is about 1.28
Therefore, the critical pressure ratio (p2/p1) is about 0.55 for natural gases.
In industry, the critical pressure ratio is taken as 0.55 for natural gas
0.60 for oil flow.
Rule of thumb: In field operations, it commonly assumed that the critical flow
conditions are reached when the downstream pressure is half of the upstream
pressure (p2/p1 =0.5) .
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 78
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
The pressure reduction after the choke and the resulting sudden
gas expansion can cause a significant temperature drop in gas flow lines.
Even if the temperature stays above the ice point, gas hydrates
(methane+water molecules) can form and cause plugging problems.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 79
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 80
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
• Multiphase Flow
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 81
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
The kinetic energy component of the energy equation can be re-arranged as:
p
q 8074CD d 2
2
where q = flow rate, bbl/d
d2 = choke diameter, inch
p = pressure drop across the choke, psi
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 82
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Choke flow coefficients (CD) can be obtained from graphs, if the Reynolds
Number and Choke/pipe diameter ratio is known.
Choke flow coefficients (CD) can be obtained from graphs, if the Reynolds
Number and Choke/pipe diameter ratio is known.
4. Using the liquid velocity, calculate NRe and check if NRe>106. If yes, the
assumption in Step 1 is correct and the calculated rate is also correct. If
not, use calculated NRe to determine CD from the graph and repeat steps 2
to 4 until the difference between the calculated rates in two consecutive
steps is low.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 85
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Single Phase Gas Flow across Chokes:
The pressure drop across a choke for gas flow is derived separately for
Sonic and Subsonic flow:
Upstream Downstream
q d1 q
d2
p1 p2 pdn
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 86
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
20qscg g
N Re where = gas viscosity, cp
d 2
The gas velocity for subsonic flow is less than the sound velocity.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 87
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
For sonic flow conditions, the gas rate reaches its maximum value.
k 1
k 2 k 1
qsc 879C D A2 pup
g T k 1
g up
where qsc = gas flow rate, Mscf/d
pup = choke inlet (upstream) pressure, psia
A2 = cross sectional area of choke, in2
Tup = upstream temperature, R
gg = gas specific gravity (air=1.0)
Upstream Downstream
q d1 q
d2
p1 p2 pdn
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 88
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
For sonic flow conditions, choke flow coefficient CD is not sensitive to Reynolds
number (NRe) if NRe is greater than 106. Therefore, CD value at NRe=106 is
assumed for CD values at higher NRe.
The gas velocity for sonic flow is at the sound velocity, for in situ conditions.
z dn k 1
constant pressure (187.7 lbf-ft/lbm-R)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 89
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
For sonic flow conditions, several empirical correlations are available, they all
have the following general form:
where q = gross liquid flow rate (water+oil) , bbl/d
CR m q
pup pup = upstream pressure at choke, psia
R = producing gas-liquid ratio, scf/bbl
Sn S = choke size, 1/64 in.
C, m,n = Empirical constants related to fluid properties.
A summary table for the constants provided by different researchers are below:
Correlation C m n
Gilbert 10 0.546 1.89
Gilbert and Ros correlations
Ros 17.4 0.5 2 are commonly used in oil
Baxendell 9.56 0.546 1.93 industry.
Achong 3.82 0.65 1.88
Pilehvari 46.67 0.313 2.11
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 90
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
Various models exist in literature with each model having its limitations.
Guo et al’s book (Chapter 5, pages 64,65) summarizes the work in this field.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 91
PETE 331 – Choke Performance
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 92
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 4
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE 331
Course Outline:
• Reservoir Deliverability
Flow Regimes
Inflow Performance Relationship
• Wellbore Performance
• Choke Performance
• Well Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE 331
Well Deliverability
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Objective:
• Learn the definition and use of Nodal Analysis in oil and gas wells
• Learn the performance prediction of oil and gas reservoirs using Nodal
analysis and material balance calculations.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Main Text:
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE 331 Simplified Schematic Production System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
pwhf pdownstream
Choke Performance:
CHOKE
Relation between q, pwhf, pdownstream
pr pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE 331 Simplified Schematic Production System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
Gas
T M
Water Pump
Pressure Losses in the System:
Dp1 = pr – pbhfs .... Loss in Reservoir
Dp2 = pbhfs – pbhf .... Loss in Near Wellbore & Completions
Dp3 = pbhf – pwhf .... Loss in Tubing (Vertical Flow)
Dp4 = pwhf – psp .... Loss in Flowline
Dp5 = psp – pst .... Loss in Transfer line
S Dp = pr – pst .... Total Pressure Loss
pr = Reservoir pressure
pbhfs = Bottom hole flowing pressure near wellbore
pbhf = Bottom hole flowing pressure
pr pbhfs pwhf = Wellhead flowing pressure
pbhf psp = Separator pressure
pst = Stock Tank pressure
Ppl = Pipeline Pressure
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE 331 – Simplified Schematic Pressure Profile for Production System
pr Pressure Loss
pbhfs due to Choking
pbhf Increase
by Pump
to Pipeline
Pressure
pwhf Intake
Pressure Loss Pressure
due to Wellbore
Damage (Skin)
psp pst
Well Deliverability
and
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
or,
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Pwhf
Pr Pbhf
Operating Point
Outflow Performance Curve
TPR (gives q vs pbhf for a given
wellhead flowing pressure, pwhf)
TPR curves gives the change in bottom hole flowing pressure (Pbhf) with
respect to flow rate (q).
In constructing the TPR curve, Pbhf is calculated by adding the well head
flowing pressure (Pwhf) to the pressure drop in the production string (tubing)
for the given flow rate (q).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 12
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability
Constructing TPR curves by flow models:
Calculate Pbhf by using computerized homogeneous or separated flow models. Run the
model for different flow rates for a given Pwhf. Record and plot the q vs. Pbhf values.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
When the flow rate is increased or decreased, change in the pressure drop due to potential
and kinetic energy is very small (unless fluid properties change substantially) compared to
frictional pressure drop changes.
Generally, by increasing flow rates (higher velocities) the frictional pressure drop increases.
For the TPR curve, this results in an increase in Pbhf as q increases (i.e. the pressure drop
[Pbhf – Pwhf] increases when q increases. Pwhf is constant, therefore, Pbhf increases).
But, at low flow rates (low velocity), Pbhf may decrease as q increases. This is because in
laminar flow regime and turbulent flow regime with relatively low flow velocities, the friction
factor decreases with increasing velocities,. (see Moody Chart in the next slide).
Because of this change in friction factor in low and high velocities, there may be two points of
intersection for IPR and TPR curves, for multiphase mixtures.
First intersection represents an unstable flow condition. The second intersection represents
a stable flow condition. The well flows with the rate at second intersection point.
At unstable flow condition, a small rate change makes a big change in flowing pressure. At
stable flow conditions, small rate changes does not effect the flowing pressure much.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
IPR
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Nodal Analysis
In order to model the fluid flow in production system, the production system is
divided into ‘nodes’.
Nodes can be :
Reservoir
Bottom Hole
Artificial lift system (downhole pump)
Wellhead
Separator
The system analysis for the determination of fluid production rate and pressure
at a specified ‘node’ is called ‘Nodal Analysis’.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 16
PETE 331
Nodal Analysis:
• Wellhead Node
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE 331 Simplified Schematic Production System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
Gas
pwhf
T M
2
psp Oil pst Sales
Separator
M Stock Tank
Water Pump
pr 1
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Wellhead F. Pressure
CPR
TPR
WPR
IPR
Rate Rate
IPR = Inflow Performance WPR = Well Performance
Relationship Relationship
TPR = Tubing Performance CPR = Choke Performance
Relationship Relationship
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
TPR
Increasing Tubing ID
IPR
Oil Rate
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
TPR
IPR
Oil Rate
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Predicting the production rate and wellhead flowing pressure change for
different choke sizes (Wellhead Node)
Wellhead Flowing Pressure
CPR
WPR
Rate
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
• Wellhead Node
Gas Well
Oil Well
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
qsc C p p 2 bhf q
2 n
2
pbhf p sc
2
(1)
can be rearranged as :
C
Well Deliverability Equation:
Exps phf
2 2
pbhf (2)
Di cos
5
where Phf = Flowing Pressure at distance L from the bottom hole depth.
0.0375 g L cos
s ( Phf = Pwhf if L = Tubing Length )
zT
For Graphical Solution:
IPR (1) and TPR (2) is plotted and q is found
from their intersection.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 24
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Exps 1 f M qsc
1 2 2
4
qsc
2
p Exps phf
2 n 6.67 x10 z T
0
2
C Di cos
5
or,
n
2 4
Exps 1 f M qsc 2
z T
2 2
q sc C p Exps phf
6.67 x10
2
Di cos
5
The equation can be solved with a numerical technique such as Newton
Raphson iteration for gas rate, qsc. Computer programs are frequently
used for such applications.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Analysis with Bottom Hole Node – Oil Well (Reservoir Pressure above bubble point)
k Dh
Dp pbhf pwhf
(2)
144
where
2
f 2 F qo M 2 For Graphical Solution:
k IPR (1) and TPR (2) is plotted and q is found
7.4137 x1010 D 5 from their intersection.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
k L
q J p pwhf
*
144
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 27
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Analysis with Bottom Hole Node – Oil Well (Reservoir Pressure below bubble point
pressure)
pbhf p
2
q qmax 1 0.2 0.8 bhf
p p
or
q
pbhf 0.125 p 81 80 1 (1)
max
q
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 28
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
144
dp
fF M 2
D um 2
(2)
dz 7.413 x1010 D 5 2 g c Dz
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 29
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Analysis with Bottom Hole Node – Oil Well (Reservoir Pressure above bubble point
Pressure but flowing bottom hole pressure below bubble point pressure)
pbhf p
2
q qbp qv 1 0.2
0.8 bhf (1)
p p
bp bp
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
144
dp
fF M 2
D um 2
(2)
dz 7.413 x1010 D 5 2 g c Dz
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
• Wellhead Node
Gas Well
Oil Well
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
k 1
k 2 k 1 (2)
qsc 879C D Ap whf
T k 1 For Graphical Solution:
g up WPR (1) and CPR (2) is plotted
and q is found from their intersection.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Analysis with Wellhead Node – Oil Well (Reservoir Pressure above bubble point)
k L
pbhf pwhf (2)
144 (2)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
k L
q J p pwhf
*
(3)
144
(See slide 27)
CR m q
pwhf (4)
Sn
For Graphical Solution:
WPR (3) and CPR (4) is plotted
and q is found from their intersection.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
CR m q k L
q J p n
*
S
144
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Analysis with Wellhead Node – Oil Well (Reservoir Pressure below bubble point
pressure)
pbhf p
2
q qmax 1 0.2 0.8 bhf
p p
or
q
pbhf 0.125 p 81 80 1 (1)
max
q
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
144
dp
fF M 2
D um 2
(2)
dz 7.413 x1010 D 5 2 g c Dz
CR m q
Choke Performance Relationship: pwhf (3)
Sn
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
Analysis with Wellhead Node – Oil Well (Reservoir Pressure above bubble point
Pressure but flowing bottom hole pressure below bubble point pressure)
pbhf p
2
q qbp qv 1 0.2
0.8 bhf (1)
p p
bp bp
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 40
PETE 331 – Well Deliverability – Nodal Analysis
144
dp
fF M 2
D um 2
(2)
dz 7.413 x1010 D 5 2 g c Dz
CR m q
Choke Performance Relationship: pwhf (3)
Sn
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Economical Analysis
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 44
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
The transient flow period equation which can be used for generating IPR curves
for any time t before the pressure wave reaches the reservoir boundary is:
kh pi pbhf
q
k
162.6 Bo o log t log 3 . 23 0 . 87 S
o ct rw 2
Time required for the pressure wave to reach reservoir boundary can be
calculated by:
o ct re 2
t pss 1,200
k
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
TPR does not change during the transient flow period, assuming that fluid
properties do not change in the well during this period.
or
Flow rates are calculated using IPR and TPR relations. After calculating flow
rates at different times, cumulative production can be calculated for the time intervals.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 46
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
IPR
TPR
t4 t3 t2 t1
q4 q3 q2 q1
Production Rate where t is production time
q is production rate
(if Single Phase IPR curve and constant TPR curve is assumed)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
IPR
TPR
q4 q3 q2 q1
Production Rate
where t is production time
q is production rate
(if Two Phase IPR curve and constant TPR curve is assumed)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Below the bubble point, gas comes out of solution (saturated reservoir) and
the gas phase also contributes to expansion drive, together with oil, water
phases and reservoir rock. This is called solution gas drive.
Different mathematical models are used for forecasting the production from
undersaturated and saturated oil reservoirs.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
q
kh p pbhf
1 4A
141.2 Bo o ln S
2 C A rw
2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 53
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Compressibility is: c 1 V
where V = Reservoir Fluid Volume
P = Reservoir Pressure
V P
e c pi p
Integration gives: V where Vi = Reservoir Fluid Volume at Pi
V = Reservoir Fluid Volume at P
Vi c = compressibility
pi = Initial Reservoir Pressure
p = Current Average Reservoir Pressure
The difference between Vi and V is the produced Volume, Vp
Therefore, recovery ratio (r) is equal to:
r
Vp
e c pi p 1 For a undersaturated oil reservoir; oil,
formation water and rock expand as
Vi reservoir pressure drops. The compressibility
c, therefore, should be the total
compressibility, ct.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 54
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
If the original oil-in-place volume (N) is known, the cumulative oil recovery
(cumulative production) is expressed as:
N p rN
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 55
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Step 2. Perform Nodal Analysis and obtain a production rate ( q ) for each p.
Step 5. Calculate production time (Dt) for each average reservoir pressure
interval by Dt = DNp / q and production time by t = S Dt.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 56
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
IPR
TPR
t4 t3 t2 t1
q4 q3 q2 q1
where t is production time
Production Rate q is production rate
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 57
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 58
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Both IPR and TPR curves change with time because of significant changes
in fluid properties, relative permeability and gas liquid ratio (GLR).
IPR can be described by Vogel’s Model, which gives the flow rate, when the
bottom hole flowing pressure (pbhf) is less than the bubble point pressure
(pbp) :
J p
2
*
pbhf pbhf
q 1 0.2 0.8
1.8 p p
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 59
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Oil Production during Pseudo Steady State Flow Period
Material balance models are used to calculate production forecast during the two
phase flow period (saturated reservoirs producing with solution gas drive
mechanism).
The commonly used method is based on Tarner’s work (1944) and described in the
Reservoir Engineering Book by Craft and Hawkins(1991).
This topic will be covered in your Reservoir Engineering Course, so it will be only
briefly described in the following slides.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 60
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Oil Production during Two Phase Flow Period (Saturated Reservoirs under
Solution Gas Drive)
Step 2. Estimate fluid properties for at each average reservoir pressure and
calculate incremental cumulative production (DNp) and cumulative production
(Np) within each average reservoir pressure interval. (See following slides for
the calculation of Np)
Step 3. Perform Nodal Analysis and obtain production rate ( q ) for each
average reservoir pressure ( p ).
Step 4. Calculate production time (Dt) for each average reservoir pressure
interval by Dt = DNp / q and cumulative production time by t = S Dt.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 61
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Methodology for Calculating Produced Oil Volume (Np) for Two Phase Reservoirs:
Step 1. Calculate coefficients Fn and Fg for each average reservoir pressure value.
Find average Fn and Fg for each average reservoir pressure interval.
Bo Rs Bg Bg
Fn Fg
Bo Boi Rsi Rs Bg Bo Boi Rsi Rs Bg
where Bg should be in rb/scf, if Rs is in scf/stb
Step 2. Assume an average gas-oil ratio ( R ) for the pressure interval. Calculate
the incremental oil production (DNp) and incremental gas production (DGp) by:
1 Fn N p F gGp
1 1
DN p
1
DG p DN p R
1 1
F n RF g
where Np1 and Gp1 are the cumulative oil and gas production per stb of oil in place
at the beginning of the average reservoir pressure interval.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 62
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Methodology for Calculating Produced Oil Volume (Np) for Two Phase Reservoirs:
Step 3. Calculate cumulative oil and gas production at the end of the interval by
adding DNp1 to Np1 and DGp1 to Gp1.
k rg o Bo
Step 6. Calculate average gas oil ratio by: R Rs
k ro g Bg
where Bg should be in rb/scf if Rs is in scf/stb
Step 7. Compare the calculated average gas oil ratio ( R ) with the value assumed
in Step 2 . Repeat Steps 2 through 6 until R converges.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 63
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 64
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
The transient flow period equation which can be used for generating IPR curves
for any time t before the pressure wave reaches the reservoir boundary is:
khm pi m pbhf
qg
k
1638T log t log 3 . 23 0 . 87 S
o ct rw 2
The above equation can be used until the pressure pulse reaches the
reservoir boundary. This time can be calculated by:
o ct re 2
t pss 1,200
k
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 65
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
TPR does not change during the transient flow period, assuming that fluid
properties do not change in the well during this period.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 66
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 67
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Gas production during pseudo steady state flow period is due to gas
expansion.
The IPR model for gas flow in radial geometry is given as:
qg
kh m p m p bhf
re 3
1,424T ln S Dq g
rw 4
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 68
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
TPR usually does not change during the pseudo steady state flow period,
assuming that fluid properties do not change in the well during this period. This
condition is true if there is no liquid loading problem in the well and the well head
pressure is kept constant over time.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 69
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
p
Final Equation for calculating
Gas Production becomes:
G p Gi 1 z
pi
zi
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 70
PETE 331 – Production Forecast
Step 2. Estimate fluid properties for at each average reservoir pressure and
calculate incremental cumulative production (DGp) and cumulative production
(Gp) within each average reservoir pressure interval.
Step 3. Perform Nodal Analysis and obtain production rate ( q ) for each
average reservoir pressure ( p ).
Step 4. Calculate production time (Dt) for each average reservoir pressure
interval by Dt = DGp / q and cumulative production time by t = S Dt.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 71
PETE 331
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 72
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 5
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Main Text:
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Formation Damage:
Formation damage is caused during
drilling, workover and production
operations.
Permeable
The damage is due to the plugging Zone
of pore space by external or internal
solid particles and fluids.
Permeable
Zone
Mud Cake
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Skin Factor:
The formation damage in the near wellbore is quantified with a ‘Skin
Factor’.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Effect of Damaged Zone (Positive Skin) on
Bottom Hole Flowing Pressure:
Producing Well Undamaged Well (Skin=0) :
qundamaged
re pr pr
pr
pbhf
pbhfundamaged
For the same production rate, the pbhf of
a damaged well is lower than the
undamaged well.
re re
This is because of the lower permeability Damaged Well (Skin=Positive) :
(higher pressure drop) in the damaged qdamaged
zone around the wellbore. pr pr
That is;
𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑑 < 𝑃𝑏ℎ𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑑
𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑑 = 𝑞𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑑
The Skin factor is an empirical factor used to include the effects of several
different factors which are not considered in the theoretical basis when the flow
equations were derived.
Skin factor includes the following effects:
where: S SD SC SP SPS
SD : the damage skin created during drilling, cementing, workover, fluid
injection and production
SC+ : the skin component due to partial completion and deviated well
SSPS : the pseudo skin components due to non Darcy flow effects,
multiphase effect and flow convergence near the wellbore.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
S SD SC SP SPS
SD : the damage skin created during drilling, cementing, workover, fluid
injection and production
Drilling Fluids (Muds) are designed to create stable, safe boreholes and to have
high rate of penetration.
In order to minimize the formation damage by drilling fluids, the following must also
be considered:
• minimize the mud invasion (solids and filtrate) by forming a thin, low permeability
filter cake.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Depending on the pore throat size and the permeability of the formation,
the solid particles in the mud may invade the formation and plug the pore
throats.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 11
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Wells which are completed open hole without stimulation are more effected
by this kind of damage. Especially horizontal wells which are completed
as openhole.
If the fracture apertures are very large and mud loss can not be
prevented, bridging material (such as calcium carbonate pills, hay, nutshell
etc.) can be dumped into the mud to plug the fractured zone and stop the
mud loss.
This will allow to continue to drilling, but it will plug the fractures and
damage the productivity.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 12
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
1. Swelling of clays
Some clays (smectite and illite) swell when they come in contact with
water. Their volumes can increase up to 20 times their original volume.
This reduces the pore space and plugs the pore throats, reducing the
permeability in the invaded zone.
2. Fines Migration:
3. Water Blocking:
If water based mud is used, the water saturation increases in the zone
invaded by the mud filtrate. The capillary forces tend to hold this water in the
pore throats, causing water blocks and decreasing permeability.
If the viscous forces are high compared to capillary forces, the water in the
invaded zone will be removed (pushed back into the wellbore) by the
produced oil.
However, if the capillary forces are higher compared to viscous forces (such
as tight gas reservoirs) it may be very difficult to remove the water blocks.
The wettability of the rock also has an effect on water blocking. If the rock is
water wet, the capillary forces will be higher and it will be more difficult to
remove the water blocking. If oil wet, it is easier to remove the formation
damage due to water blocking.
Solvents may be injected to reduce the oil/water surface tension and remove
the water blocks.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
4. Wettability Change:
Converting reservoir rock from water wet to oil wet decreases oil relative
permeability and increases water relative permeability. This is undesirable.
Some reasons for wettability change are: surfactants in drilling and workover
fluids. Corrosion inhibitors and dispersants in stimulation fluids, use of resins
in sand control applications.
Some solvents and surfactants may be used to change the wettability of the
formation.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Solids in the cement usually can not penetrate into the formation because
the size of the solid particles in the cement are bigger than the pore throat
sizes. Therefore the formation damage during cementing is basically due to
the invasion of the cement filtrate.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 16
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
After the drilling operations are completed and the production casing is set
and cemented, the drilling fluid must be replaced by workover (completion)
fluid during the completion and re-completion operations (such as
perforating, stimulation, placement of production string, artificial lift
operations etc.) because drilling fluids can damage the production zone.
Workover fluids generally do not contain any solids. Usually brines (salts
dissolved in water) are used as workover fluids, with various liquid additives.
Salts are added to the workover fluid for increasing the density of the water
to overcome formation pressure and to prevent damage to the formation
because fresh water may cause clay swelling and fines migration.
If the workover fluid is not properly prepared and filtered, it may contain solid
particles such as corrosion products, bacteria and debris from wellbore and
surface tanks. These solid particles may plug the pore throats and damage
the productivity.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Unlike drilling muds, generally there are no solid particles in workover fluids.
This means that if there is any fluid loss to the formation, it can not be
stopped. Therefore, to minimize fluid loss into the formation, the density of
the workover fluids are adjusted to have minimum pressure difference
between the workover fluid and formation pressure.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
There are two main properties of injection water which determine their
formation damage potential:
• Total dissolved solids (salinity and ion) content and
• Total suspended solids content (solids and oil droplets)
If fresh water is injected into formations which contain swelling shales, the
injectivity will reduce.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
If the injected water is not properly prepared and filtered, it may contain solid
particles such as corrosion products, bacteria, living organisms, and debris
from wellbore and surface tanks. These solid particles may plug the pore
throats and damage the injectivity.
If the produced water is used for injection and contains oil droplets, the oil
droplets may also plug the formation and reduce water injectivity.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Formation damage can occur gradually after the production begins. Some of
the reasons for the damage are:
Paraffins:
Paraffins are high molecular weight alkanes (C20+) which can be deposited
in wellbore and flowlines during production. The primary cause of paraffin
deposition is the loss of solubility in the crude oil. The loss in solubility is
caused by changes in temperature, pressure or composition of the crude oil
as a result of loss of dissolved gasses.
Asphaltenes:
Asphaltenes are high molecular constituents of crude oil containing
nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen compounds. Precipitation of asphaltenes
occurs in the formation because of the loss of solubility caused by changes
in temperature, pressure or composition of the crude oil as a result of loss of
dissolved gasses.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
When the oil well starts to produce water, the water can cause the swelling of
the clays (if clays exist) around the wellbore or fines migration may occur.
When the pressure is reduced below the bubble point, oil and gas flow starts.
The productivity is reduced due to two phase flow.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
• Most horizontal wells have open hole completions, therefore the damaged
zone is not bypassed by perforations.
• During production, the pressure gradient and flow velocity is not as high as
in vertical wells. Therefore the clean up of the damaged zone is not as
effective as vertical wells.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Examples for Horizontal Wells and Multilaterals:
Increasing the reservoir contact by drilling long sections in the reservoir is desired
to increase the well productivity.
S SD SC SP SPS
SC+ : the skin component due to partial completion and deviated well
Partial Completion:
If the well is open to flow only from a section of the reservoir thickness, instead
of all reservoir thickness, it is ‘Partially Completed’.
Partial completion may exist if:
• Perforation job is bad. Only some of the perforations are effective.
• Well is not drilled to the bottom of the formation
• Perforations are deliberately made partially to prevent water or gas coning.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
In partially completed wells, radial flow exists only at the completion interval.
The additional pressure drop due to the bending of the flow lines (deviation
from radial flow) result in a positive skin effect which is denoted by Sc.
radial flow
deviation from radial flow
(radial + spherical)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Slanted Wells:
A deviated (slanted) well increases the exposure of the well to the reservoir.
(in the below figure: h’w = hw / Cos , therefore h’w > hw)
The larger the deviation angle, the larger the exposure to the reservoir and the
larger the negative contribution to the total skin effect will be.
The skin effect due to slant is denoted by S, and the composite skin from
partial completion and slant is denoted by Sc+.
hw h’w
h’w hw
rw
hw h hw h
zw zw
Table for finding Skin Factors for Partially Penetrating Slanted Wells:
Table for finding Skin Factors for Partially Penetrating Slanted Wells (Continued):
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
S SD SC SP SPS
SP : the skin associated with cased hole completions. It is due to non ideal flow
conditions around the perforations.
Perforation skin effect can be divided into three components (Karakas and Tariq, 1988):
rw = well radius
rperf = perforation radius
lperf = perforation length
hperf = distance between perforations
= angle of perforation phasing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Constants for Perforation Skin Effect Calculation (Karakas and Tariq, 1988) :
Perforation a a1 a2 b1 b2 c1 c2
Phasing
0o (360o) 0.250 -2.091 0.0453 5.1313 1.8672 1.6E-1 2.675
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
b 1
SV 10a hD rD
b
Calculation of SV :
where: a = a1 log rD + a2
b = b1 rD + b2
and hD, rD are dimensionless parameters defined as:
hperf kH rperf k H
hD rD 1
l perf kV
2h perf kV
The constants a1, a2, b1 and b2 are functions of perforation phasing and
can be obtained from the table.
The vertical skin effect (Sv) is potentially the largest contributor to total
perforation skin factor (Sp). Especially when hperf is large (small perforation
densities) Sv can be very large.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
Calculation of Swb :
S wb c1e c2 rwD
c1, c2 can be obtained from the skin effect calculation constants table.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE – 331 Formation Damage and Skin Factor
S SD SC SP SPS
SSPS : the pseudo skin components due to non Darcy flow effects, multiphase
effect and flow convergence near the wellbore.
Non Darcy Flow Effects: For high rate gas wells (turbulent flow conditions), an
additional pressure drop is observed because the flow equations are derived for
Darcy flow. This can also be observed in very high rate oil wells.
The observed skin in such wells are function of production rate as:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE - 331
Well Stimulation :
Acidizing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Main Text:
Additional Reference:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Acidizing:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 40
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Matrix Acidizing:
All of the acid treatments in sandstones and most of the acid treatments in
carbonates are ‘Matrix’ treatments, where formation is not fractured during
acidizing.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Acid Fracturing:
In acid fracturing, the acid fluids are injected into the formation above the
fracturing pressure. When the injection is stopped, the fracture closes. The
intention is to dissolve the walls of the created fracture in a non uniform way,
so that when the injection stops and fracture closes, there is a path of high
conductivity.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Therefore, matrix acid should generally be applied only if the well has a
high skin, which can not be attributed to partial penetration (SC),
perforation efficiency (SP), or other factors related to non ideal flow
conditions (SSPS).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 44
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Basic Chemical Reactions in Acidizing:
Calcite:
2HCl + CaCO3 CaCl2 + H2O + CO2
Dolomite:
4 HCl + CaMg (CO3)2 CaCl2 + MgCl2 + 2 H2O + 2 CO2
Quartz:
4 HF + SiO2 SiF4 + 2 H2O
SiF4 + 2HF H2SiF6
Carbonate:
2HF + CaCO3 CaF2 + H2O + CO2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Dissolving Power of Acids:
A convenient way to calculate the volume (or mass) of the acid which is
required to dissolve a certain volume (or mass) of mineral is to use the
dissolving power.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 46
PETE – 331 Acidizing
X= (0.21) (1.07) (62.4) / (169) = 0.082 ft3 CaCO3 / ft3 15% HCl
(which means: 1 ft3 of 15% HCl solution is needed to dissolve 0.082 ft3 of
reservoir rock.)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Reaction Kinetics:
Reaction kinetics determines the rate at which the acid dissolves the
reservoir rock.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Precipitation of Acid Reaction Products:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
3. Post Flush: Injection of water, diesel or HCl to displace the HCl/HF mixture
from the tubing and wellbore (to push all of the HCl/HF to the formation)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
• Calculating the required volumes of; preflush, HF/HCl Mixture and postflush.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 53
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
The most commonly used acid types and concentrations for sandstone reservoirs
are:
Main Acid with : 12%HCl + 3% HF (this acid is named MUD ACID in oil industry)
In recent years, the tendency is to lower the HF acid concentration. The benefit of
using lower concentrations of HF is to reduce the damage due to the precipitation
of reaction products and to reduce the risk of unconsolidating the formation
around the wellbore.
The best method to select the optimum acid type and concentration for a specific
reservoir is to make laboratory studies with the reservoir rock and fluids.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 54
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
Table for Recommended Acid Type and Strength for Sandstone Acidizing:
(Prepared by McLeod (1984) based on Field Experience)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 55
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
ra rw
Vm (ra rw )(1 )Cm
2 2
V p (ra rw )
2 2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 56
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
The acid volume requirement for the HCl/HF acid treatment depends on
mineralogy and acid type and strength.
For successful sandstone acidizing, more than 120 gal/ft of HCl/HF acid is
usually required. Less volumes can may be used where only shallow,
moderate damage exists. For example, 25 to 75 gal/ft is used on new
perforations to remove the damage during perforation.
There are different methods for calculating the required HCl/HF acid
volume. The most commonly used method is the ‘two mineral model’. This
model requires a numerical technique for solution. For future reference on
calculating HCl/HF with two mineral model see: Economides et al., 1994,
Chapter 14, pages 350 - 357
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 57
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
There is an upper limit to acid injection rate which is imposed by the formation
breakdown (fracture) pressure, pbd. The injection pressure must stay below pbd
to prevent fracturing.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 58
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
qi ,max
6
4.917 10 kh pbd p psf where
qi = maximum injection rate, bbl/min
k = permeability of undamaged formation, md
0.472re
a ln
S
h = thickness of pay zone to be treated, ft
pbd = formation breakdown pressure, psia
rw p = reservoir pressure, psia
psf = safety margin, 200 to 500 psi
a = viscosity of acid solution
re = drainage radius, ft
rw = wellbore radius, ft
S = skin factor
The acid injection rate can also be limited by the maximum available outlet
pressure of the surface pump.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 59
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
Acid Injection Pressure:
where the hydrostatic head and frictional drop term can be calculated as:
f M oQ 2 L
ph 0.433 o L sin p f 1.15 10 5
d5
o = specific gravity of the injected solution, water:1.0
L = Length of injection pipe (tubing), ft
= Deviation of the injection pipe from horizontal (for vertical tubing, Sin =1.0)
fM = Moody’s friction factor
Q = Injection rate, bbl/day
d = pipe (tubing) diameter, in
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 60
PETE – 331 Acidizing Sandstones
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 61
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 62
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
In sandstones, the reaction rates are slow and the acid front moves
uniformly into the formation. However, in Carbonates, the reaction rates
are fast, therefore highly non-uniform solution patterns are observed.
Wormholes are highly conductive flow channels that connect the near-well
region to the well.
(figures from McDuff et. al., ‘Understanding wormholes in carbonates, JPT, October 2010)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 63
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 64
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
HCl is very effective for dissolving calcite. It is the most widely used acid for
carbonate reservoirs.
Most commonly used concentration for HCl in acid solutions is 15% by volume.
Weaker acids, such as acetic acid and formic acid can also be used for treating
damaged perforations.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 65
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
• Volumetric Model
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 66
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 67
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
Vh rwh rw PV bt
2 2
where (PV)bt is the number of pore volumes of acid injected at the time of
wormhole breakthrough at the end of the core. This data comes from lab tests.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 68
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
There is a certain optimal acid flux for which wormholes will most efficiently
propagate .
Acid Fracturing:
Usually, a viscous pad fluid is injected ahead of the acid to start the fracture.
Acid is injected after the fracture is created. The acid dissolves the fracture
walls irregularly. When the injection is stopped, the fracture closes, but the
irregularly dissolved fracture walls leaves open channels connecting the
wellbore to undamaged zone.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 70
PETE – 331 Acidizing Carbonates
Acid Fracturing:
Acidizing Additives:
Some chemicals are added to the acid solution for various reasons.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 72
PETE – 331 Acidizing
A critical factor for the success of a matrix acid treatment is the proper
placement of the acid so that all of the productive intervals are contacted by
sufficient volumes of acid.
Bullheading:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 73
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Acid pumped
from the truck
pr pr
Pbh
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 74
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Acid Truck:
Operation Control
Mixing Tank
Piston Pump
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 75
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Acid placement and diversion techniques are used to make sure that acid is
distributed to all of the treated formation. Contrary to bullheading, proper
placement of the acid allows effective acid stimulation.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 76
PETE – 331 Acidizing
In this method, the tubulars are removed from the well. Production tubing or
coil tubing may be used with packers to isolate each zone and inject acid into
these zones selectively.
Ball Sealers:
Ball sealers are rubber coated balls that are designed to plug the perforations in
the casing. Ball sealers are added to the injected acid in stages, so that after
some perforations receive the acid, they are plugged, and the acid goes to other
perforations. Balls are heavier than acid solution, so , when the treatment is
completed and the injection stops, balls fall to the bottom of the well, opening
the perforations to flow.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 77
PETE – 331 Acidizing
This is the most common method for acid diversion. These are fine particles
which form a filter cake on the formation face where the acid in injected. This
filter cake prevents more acid to go into the same interval, so the acid is
diverted to other regions. These agents must easily removed after the
treatment. Most agents are soluble in reservoir fluids.
In these treatments, gel or foam goes into the most permeable layers and form
a viscous plug. This diverts the acid to other intervals.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 78
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 79
PETE – 331 Acidizing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 80
PETE – 331 Acidizing
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 81
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 6
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331
Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE – 331
Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE – 331
Main Text:
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Main Elements of Hydraulic Fracturing Operations:
Fracturing Fluid:
Injected to reservoir at high pressures and
rates. Opens the reservoir rock (creates
the fracture) and carries the proppants
into the fracture.
Proppant:
Small, spherical grains which are
injected into the fracture to keep
it open and create a high
permeability channel connecting
the reservoir to wellbore after the
fracture operation is finished.
Blender: Mixer (usually mounted on trucks) which mixes the fracturing fluid
with proppant.
Pumper: High capacity, high pressure pumps (mounted on trucks) to pump the
fracturing fluid and proppants into the wellbore to create the fracture.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Hydraulic Fracturing jobs are performed in two stages:
•Pad Stage
•Slurry Stage
As additional fluid is
injected, the opening is
extended and the
fracture propagates.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 8
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
•Pad Stage
•Slurry Stage
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
When the injection is stopped and the injection pressure is released, the
fractured formation tends to close due to the high in situ stress.
The path permeability can be five to six orders of magnitude higher than the
reservoir permeability.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Start of Pad Injection
Production
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 11
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Typical average thickness of a fracture is in the order of 0.25 inch (0.6 cm)
or less.
The formation fluids flow from the reservoir into the fracture and then, they
move through the fracture path to reach the well.
Fracture Half-Length
Fracture Length
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 12
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Fracture increases the reservoir contact area, which increases the flow capacity
of the reservoir into the wellbore.
Unfractured Well:
Fractured Well:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• Fracture Geometry
• Post-Frac Evaluation
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Formation Fracturing Pressure
It is the pressure where the injected fluid pressure overcomes the forces
which hold the reservoir rock together and opens a fracture in the reservoir
rock.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 16
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Poisson’s Ratio:
The Poisson ratio is the ratio of the fraction (or percent) of expansion divided
by the fraction (or percent) of compression, for small values of these
changes.
b1 b2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Overburden Stress:
Overburden stress is simply due to the weight of the formations above the
reservoir.
The overburden stress is carried by the rock grains and the fluid in the
pore space between the rock grains.
The stress carried by the rock grains is called effective stress. This is the
stress which the injected fluid must overcome in order to fracture
(breakdown) the formation.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
where
sv
s 'h s 'v s’h = effective horizontal stress, psi
1 = Poisson’s Ratio
s h s 'h p p
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
The magnitude of the horizontal stress may change with direction because of
the tectonic effect.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• Fracture Geometry
• Post-Frac Evaluation
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Fracture Geometry:
There are 4 different models used for calculating fracture width. All models
are for single, sheet like fractures, but they assume different fracture shapes.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Fracture Geometry:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 24
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• Fracture Geometry
• Post-Frac Evaluation
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
The relative importance of each step can be analyzed using the concept of
Fracture Conductivity:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
If the fracture dimension is much less than the drainage area of the well,
radial flow assumption is still valid and the productivity of the fractured well
can be estimated by using the radial flow equations.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 27
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
re 1
S
ln
J rw 2
J o ln re 1 S
f
rw 2 for pseudo-steady state flow
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 28
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Effective skin factor of fractured well can be determined based on fracture
conductivity ( FCD ) and the following figure:
Sf + ln ( xf / rw )
Relation between fracture conductivity and equivalent skin factor (Cinco-Ley and Samaniego,1981)
The following correlation represents the figure above:
xf 1.65 0.328u 0.116u 2
S f ln where u = ln (FCD)
1 0.18u 0.064u 0.05u
2 3
rw
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 29
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• When FCD > 100, the parameter Sf + ln (xf / rw) approaches a constant
value
This means that for high conductivity fractures, the equivalent skin factor
depends only on fracture half length (xf) , not fracture permeability and width.
This is the situation where step 1 (flow from the formation to the fracture) is
the limiting step.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• When FCD < 1, the parameter Sf + ln (xf / rw) declines linearly with log (FCD)
Comparing last two terms, this relation indicates that for low conductivity
fractures, equivalent skin factor is more sensitive to fracture permeability and
width, than to fracture length.
This is the situation where step 2 (flow through the fracture channel into the
wellbore) is limiting step.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
If the fracture length is not very small compared to the drainage area of the well,
radial flow can not be assumed and radial flow equations can not be used.
In such cases, bilinear flow (linear flow from reservoir to fracture and linear flow
from the fracture into the wellbore) takes place, and the following equation can be
used to calculate the well productivity increase by fracturing:
r 3
0.72 ln e S o
J
rw 4
1
Jo
z e c S 1
1 e cx f 2 x c
f
where ze = distance between the fracture and the boundary of the drainage area.
and
2k
c
ze wk f
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• Fracture Geometry
• Post-Frac Evaluation
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• To carry the proppants into the created fracture and prevent them from settling
to the bottom of the perforation prematurely.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Fluid Loss (Leak off) Properties:
Spurt loss (Sp) occurs only until a filter cake is formed (if a filter cake building
fluid is used).
Fluid loss (CL) occurs after the filter cake is formed. It is a steady process
where the fluid filtrates into the formation at a steady rate, because filter cake
is not impermeable.
Excessive fluid loss prevents fracture propagation because the fluid is lost to
the formation and there is insufficient fluid volume accumulation in the
fracture.
Therefore, the selected fracturing fluid must have the lowest possible value of
fluid loss (leak off) coefficient (CL).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Viscosity:
It also affects the back flowing. So it must be easily removed by the produced
fluid.
High viscosity helps to keep the proppants in suspension, so that they do not
settle to the bottom and decrease the effective fracture height, but very high
viscosities cause excessive injection pressure requirements (very high power
requirements for injection pumps) during injection, due to high frictional losses.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Viscosity:
Ideal Fluid has low viscosity while it is pumped down a well (to have low frictional
loss and pump power requirement), maximum viscosity in the fracture (to transport
the proppants and hold them in suspension), then low viscosity after the
completion of the injection (to be produced back easily and leave the fracture
permeability high).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 40
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Selection of Proppant:
The proppant is responsible to keep the fracture open after the injection is
stopped. Therefore, it must have enough strength to bear the in situ stresses.
The closure stress (effective horizontal stress in vertical fractures) decreases
the fracture permeability by squeezing the proppants together. (see figure in
the next slide)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Permeability (darcy)
100
10
2000 6000 10000 14000
Closure stress (psi)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 44
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Types of Proppants:
Resin Coated Sand : A thin coating of resin applied to the sand to increase
strength. More costly than sand. More resistant to stress.
Sintered bauxite, Zirconium Oxide: High strength. Costly. Used only at very
high stress (deep formations).
A table for typical proppants and their characteristics is given in the following
slide.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 46
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• Grain size,
• Grain size distribution,
• Quality (amount of impurities)
• Roundness and sphericity
• Proppant density
• Porosity of the proppant pack
All these properties affect the proppant pack permeability, which affects the
fracture conductivity.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
The expected surface pressure when the bottom hole pressure is the formation
breakdown pressure is:
where psi = surface injection pressure, psia
psi pbd ph p f pbd = formation breakdown pressure, psia
ph = hydrostatic pressure, psia
pf = frictional pressure drop, psia
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
The hydrostatic head and frictional drop term can be calculated as:
f M oQ 2 L
ph p f 0.433 o L sin 1.15 10 5
d5
o = specific gravity of the frac fluid, water:1.0
L = Length of injection pipe (tubing), ft
= Deviation of the injection pipe from horizontal (for vertical tubing, Sin =1.0)
fM = Moody’s friction factor
Q = Injection rate, bbl/day
d = pipe (tubing) diameter, in
This approximation can be used for Newtonian fluids at low flow rates.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
3D Models : Most accurate. Needs a lot of data. Needs software and computing
power. Can be time consuming and costly. Should be used if feasible.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Fluid and proppant volumes are controlled by fracture length, injection rate and
fluid loss (leak off) properties.
The fracture length and proppant volume is limited by available pumping power
and economical factors.
Procedure and example calculation for treatment size selection are given in
Guo’s ‘Petroleum Production Engineering’ book, Chapter 17, page 260, Section
17.5.4. This topic will not be covered in this course.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
• Radioactive tracers
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 53
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Unconventional Gas and Oil reservoirs can have extremely low permeability
in nano Darcy range (10-9). They can not be produced economically unless
horizontal wells are drilled and multistage hydraulic fracturing is performed on
the horizontal section. Number of fracture stages can be up to 30 per well.
54
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Shale Gas/Shale Oil Field Development with Horizontal Wells and Hydraulic Fracturing
55
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Shale Gas/Shale Oil Field Development with Horizontal Wells and Hydraulic Fracturing
Because of the very low permeability, a great number of wells with multilaterals
are required for production. Multistage fracturing needs to be performed at each
horizontal section.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 56
PETE – 331 Hydraulic Fracturing
Environmental Issues Related to Massive Hydraulic Fracturing Operations:
• Usage of high water volumes: Massive hydraulic fracturing operations for shale gas/shale
oil wells can use 4,500 to 13,200 m3 of water per well.
• Contamination of soil, surface water and ground water by the produced fracturing
fluid (waste fluid disposal): Typically, about 30% of the injected fracture fluid is produced
back to the surface when the well is put on production. This fluid contains harmful chemicals
and it must be disposed properly.
• Induced seismicity: The magnitude of these events is usually too small to be detected at
the surface.
• Contamination of ground water (aquifers) by reservoir gas: This usually occurs not
because of hydraulic fracturing, but because of bad cement behind casing.
Sand Control
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 58
PETE – 331
Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 59
PETE – 331
Main Text:
• W.L. Penberthy, Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Volume IV, Chapter 5, pp 176 - 239
Additional References:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 60
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Sand Production:
The formations which produce sand are usually geologically young and
shallow, and they have little or no natural cementation between the sand
particles.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 61
PETE – 331 Sand Control
• production rate
• pressure decrease around the well
• compressive strength of the formation.
Increasing production rate and pressure drop around the wellbore increases
the sand production because the drag force is increased.
The opposing force to the drag force of the flowing reservoir fluid is the
compressive strength of the formation, which tries to hold the grains
together.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 62
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 63
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Several methods are available for minimizing sand flow from wells.
The choices range from simple changes in operating practices to
expensive completions.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 64
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Rate Restriction:
The maximum rate at which the sand flow stops can be found by trial
and error. If the well is produced below this rate, sand is not
produced.
Method is not very widely used because the maximum rate without
sand production can be below the well’s potential rate and this results
in decreased production and revenue.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 65
PETE – 331 Sand Control
This will decrease sand production but because the well is only
completed partially, well productivity will be decreased.
Plastic Consolidation:
This method involves the injection of plastic resins which attach to the
formation sand grains. The resin gets hard and binds the sand grains
together so they are not produced together with reservoir fluids.
Unless the formation is a well sorted, clean sand with large grain
size, these material may be plugged in a short time.
Slotted liners are less costly compared to screens. But they have
smaller inflow areas (more pressure drop) and plug more easily
compared to screens.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 67
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Slotted Liners:
Slot widths are 0.030 inch (0.8 mm) or higher. Minimum slot width can be
0.012 inch (0.5 mm).
Usually the single slot staggered design is preferred because the strength
of the pipe is preserved.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 68
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Screens:
Different screen designs are available to prevent the sand flow into the
wellbore.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 69
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Gravel Packing:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 70
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 71
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 72
PETE – 331 Sand Control
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 73
PETE – 331 Sand Control
2. Optimizing gravel size with respect to mean diameter of the formation sand
3. Optimizing screen-opening size to retain the gravel but allow for clear
passage of clay particles
4. Designing effective gravel placement into the perforations and across the
screen.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 74
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 75
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 7
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Objective:
Methodology and Analysis for Oil and Gas Well Tests will be covered in detail in:
‘PETE 344 – Petroleum Reservoir Engineering II’
and
‘PETE 440 – Well Test Analysis’ courses.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE - 331
• Advances in Well Test Analysis, R.C.Earlougher Jr., Monograph Volume 5, SPE, 1977
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE – 331 Well Testing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
The DST operation is generally made with a drilling rig, using the drill pipes
and drill collars. This is why it is called ‘’drill stem’’ (drill string) test.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
DST Strings have downhole valves which can be operated (opened and closed)
from the surface.
By opening and closing the main downhole valve (tester valve) and the shut-in
valve, the well can be opened to flow or it can be shut-in.
A typical drill stem test has two flow and two shut-in periods:
1. Initial Flow Period (also called pre flow)
2. Initial Shut-in Period
3. Final Flow Period (also called main flow period)
4. Final Shut-in Period
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
DST Flow and Shut-in Periods:
Shut-in Valve
Shut-in Valve
&
Closed
Main Valve
(Tester Valve)
x
Open
Flow Period : Fluid flows from Shut-in Period : Shut-in valve is closed. Fluid can not
formation into the perforated move up. Therefore the fluid in the perforated anchor
anchor and up the drill string, and below the valve is compressed until the pressure
through the valves. builds up to the reservoir pressure.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 8
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Advantage:
If the DST operation shows that the well can not produce and must be
abandoned, the production casing is not run, cemented and perforation is not
made. So a lot of money is saved.
Disadvantages:
• The open hole may collapse due to the drawdown applied during DST flow
periods. This may result in DST string getting stuck and requires fishing job.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Advantages:
• Packer can be set easily inside the casing, at any desired depth.
Disadvantage:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 11
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Anchor Shoe:
It supports the weight of the drill stem (testing string)
and the mud column. It is generally made from heavy drill
collars and therefore has a greater wall thickness
compared to drill pipes.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE – 331 Well Testing – Components of DST String
Pressure Recorders:
Packer:
It is a rubber packing element which can be expanded after
running in hole and seal the formation/ test string annulus,
segregating the annular section above and below.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE – 331 Well Testing – Components of DST String
Reverse Circulating Valve:
It allows drilling fluid circulation in order to displace the reservoir fluids
from the drillpipe to the surface before pulling the DST string out of
hole.
Bypass Valve (Equalizing Valve):
It is normally open. It allows the drilling fluid in the annulus to bypass
the packer through the inside of the drill pipe.
It is closed only during the test when the tester valve is opened.
By opening the Equalizing valve, the pressure above and below the
packer is equalized after the test is finished. The packer can be
contracted and pulled out of hole after equalizing the pressure.
Hydraulic Jars:
If the packer or the anchor pipe is stuck and the DST
string can not be pulled out of hole, hydraulic jars are
used to provide a shock to pull the string loose.
Safety Joint:
If the DST string can not be pulled out of hole and if the jarring can not
release the string, the DST string can be unscrewed from this joint.
Then, fishing operations are started to recover the
parts below the safety joint.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE – 331 Well Testing – Components of DST String
Choke :
It is a flow restriction placed near (above) the main valve to
control fluid flow rate from the test zone. Used if high rates
are expected.
2. Going in Hole:
The DST assembly and the drill pipes (drill stem) are lowered into the hole. The
displaced mud from the wellbore flows out to the mud tanks. The tester valve is
closed and shut-in valve is open during running in hole (RIH). This allows drilling mud
to go into the perforated anchor and out from the bypass ports without entering the
drill string (see figure in the next slide). The pressure recorders show the pressure
due to mud column height.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
5. Equalizing:
The weight is taken off the string and the tester valve is closed. This opens the bypass
valve and therefore, pressure is equalized across the packer.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE – 331 Phases of DST Operation
Shut-in Valve
Tester Valve
Bypass Ports
Pressure Recorder
Safety Joint &
Bypass Ports
Packer
Perforated Anchor
Blanked off
Pressure Recorder
A : Start of RIH (running in hole) for the DST Tools and the drill pipes
A-B : The pressure recorders show increasing pressure. This is due to the increasing mud
column height (hydrostatic head) as the recorders move down, together with the test string.
B : The tool is at the bottom. The Packer is not set yet. Pressure is due to the height of the
total mud column.
C : When the packer is set, the mud is compressed and the pressure increases slightly.
D : The tester valve is opened for the initial flow period. The pressure drops to the cushion
column height. If cushion is not used (DST string is empty), pressure is close to
atmospheric.
D-E : First Flow Period. The reservoir fluid enters the test string. As the height of the column
above the pressure recorder rises, it shows higher pressures.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE – 331 Sequence of Events on DST Chart
E : End of the First Flow Period. The shut-in valve is closed. The First Build-up period is
started.
E-F : First Shut-in Period. The pressure increases as the fluid below the shut-in valve is
compressed due to pressure build-up.
F : End of the First Shut-in Period. At this point, the shut-in valve is opened.
G : Beginning of the second flow period. The pressure drops down to the level of point E.
Pressure recorders show the pressure due to the column height above the recorders.
G-H : Second Flow Period. Similar to the first flow period, the reservoir fluid enters the test
string. As the height of the column above the pressure recorder rises, the recorder
shows higher pressures.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE – 331 - Sequence of Events on DST Chart
H : End of the Second Flow Period. The shut-in valve is closed. The Second Build-up period
is started.
H-I : Second Shut-in Period. The pressure increases as the fluid below the shut-in valve is
compressed due to pressure build-up.
J : The operation for pulling the DST string out of hole (POOH) is started. The tester valve is
shut-in. The packer is released. Recorders read the mud pressure due to the total mud
column height. Pressure at J is same as pressure at B, if there is no mud loss above the
packer during the test.
J-K : POOH continues until all the string is pulled out of hole.The pressure recorders show
decreasing pressure. This is due to the decreasing mud column height (hydrostatic head)
as the recorders move up, together with the DST string.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
When the hydraulic tool (tester valve) is opened, the test zone is opened
to atmospheric pressure if a cushion is not used. In this period, the
purpose is to clean up the well and to relieve the hydrostatic pressure
from the annular space within the tested interval.
If the pre-flow period is too short, the hydrostatic pressure will not be
dissipated (released) and the following shut-in period may be under the
influence of “hydrostatic super-charge” effect.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
At the end of the first flow period, the shut-in valve is closed and the
pressure below the packer is allowed to build.
The purpose of the initial shut-in period is to record the reservoir pressure
before any production has occurred. It is important to have a reliable
initial reservoir pressure at this stage, in order to compare it with the
reservoir pressure which will be obtained from the second build up period.
If there is a decrease in the reservoir pressure because of the production
made during second flow period, it may show limited reservoir volume.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 24
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
When the initial shut-in is completed, the shut-in valve is once again
opened. The purpose of this second flowing period is to allow reservoir
fluid and gas to enter the drill string. Analysis of this flow data will help to
determine the flowing capability of the tested reservoir.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
At the end of the second flow period, the shut-in valve is closed and the
pressure below the packer is allowed to build.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 27
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Use of Back Pressure in DST operations:
If DST string is empty, the bottom hole flowing pressure at the beginning of the first
flow period will be slightly higher than the atmospheric pressure. This means that in
the beginning, the drawdown will be very high (DP=Pres-Pbhf ,where DP will be
maximum when Pbhf=atmospheric).
• There will be two phase flow around the wellbore (because bottom hole
flowing pressure will be below the bubble point pressure in oil wells or
below the dew point pressure in gas wells). This will complicate the interpretations.
• There may be damage to the formation around the wellbore due to the
excessive drawdown (Pres-Pbhf). Especially unconsolidated sandstone
formations or the formations which contain fine material which can migrate
and plug the pore throats at high drag forces, will create problems. Also, if
the test is performed in open hole, the hole may collapse.
Water is the most commonly used cushion fluid. Diesel oil can also
be used. Diesel oil can be hazardous due to it’s flammable nature.
Perforated
The back pressure must be small enough to avoid killing Anchor
the well during flow. The cushion height (applied back pressure)
is selected based on reservoir pressure, expected well
productivity, reservoir fluid and rock characteristics.
Pressure
Recorder
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 29
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
time time
Low Permeability, Low Reservoir Pressure Productive, High Damage
time time
Low Permeability, High Reservoir Pressure Low Productivity, High Damage
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Examples for DST Pressure Recordings :
Operation stopped for some time while running S shaped curve in the early part of shut in curve:
in hole (RIH). Pbhf is decreased below the bubble point pressure
before the shut in periods. Gas is going back into
solution in the wellbore at the early part of shut in times.
Operation stopped while RIH. There is pressure S Shape in the later part of the flow curve and early
loss of the mud column during this time. Mud may part of shut in curve: Indicates fluid communication
be leaking into the drill string or lost to formation. around the packer. It may be because of fractures or
poorly seated packer.
(from R.C.Earlougher, Advances in Well Test Analysis, SPE, 1977, pg 102-103)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Examples for DST Pressure Recordings :
Plugging of perforated anchor pipe or bottom Decrease in the slope during flow period: Transition
hole choke. of the fluid level from drill collars (smaller ID) to drill
pipes ( larger ID).
Flat portion at the end of the flow period: Decreasing portion at the end of the flow period:
The DST string is filled and the fluid is flowing Observed in gas well tests where water cushion is
at the surface with constant Pwhf. used. At point G, water cushion reaches the surface
and flows out, decreasing the average density of the
fluid column.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Calculation of Formation Characteristics from DST Data
t p ' Dt '
To analyze the build up period of DST : Plot pbhs versus log
D t '
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Calculation of Formation Characteristics from DST Data
pi
* *
* Slope = -m
*
pbhs * * Build-up pressure data from second
* shut-in period of DST
*
*
*
*
1 10 100 1000
t p ' Dt '
Dt '
162.6qB
k can be calculated from the slope m
kh
t ' Dt '
Reservoir Pressure (pi) can be calculated from the intersection @ p =1
Dt '
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Calculation of the slope
in DST Analysis
* *
* Slope = -m
pbhs y1=1000 *
*
*
*
y2=500 *
*
*
1 10 100 1000
x1=log10=1 x2=log100=2 t p ' Dt '
To calculate the slope of a line in semi logarithmic plot: Dt '
Pick one or two log cycles (on x axis) and find the y axis values corresponding to them.
Calculate (y2-y1)/ (x2-x1) as given in the below example:
Example:
If one cycle is selected: log(10) and log(100)
For x2= log(100), y2=500
For x1=log(10), y1=1000
(unit of the slope is given as: y axis unit/cycle, in this case: psi/cycle)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
The flow rate is not constant in DST. It decreases with time because the back pressure
(bottom hole flowing pressure) increases as the fluid column height increases in the DST
string. The flow rate may stabilize if the formation fluids flow to the surface.
Since the rate is not constant, an average rate is used in the DST interpretation. Average rate
is calculated by dividing the total recovered fluid volume with the total flow time.
If there is no flow to the surface during the DST flow periods, the Total Volume of produced
liquid is calculated by calculating the pipe volume filled with the reservoir liquid. If there is
flow at the surface, the surface volume must be added to the volume of liquid in the DST
string.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
t p ' Dt '1hr
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
Dt '1hr 37
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
DST Analysis also reports Damage Ratio (DR) which is defined as:
J ideal p pbhf
DR DR > 1.0 indicates damage
J actual p pbhf Dps
and
141.2qB
Dps s
kh where s = total skin factor calculated from Horner’s plot
Radius of Investigation:
The radius in which pressure has been affected during the flow period of a
transient well test is:
kt p '
ri where ri = radius of investigation, ft
5.76 104 f ct tp’ = flow time, min
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
Calculation of Formation Characteristics from DST Data
t p ' Dt '
Dt '
t p ' Dt '
Reservoir Pressure (pi)2 can be calculated from the intersection @ =1
Dt '
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE – 331 Well Testing – DST
p12hr pwf
2
Dt 0 k t p '1
log
3.2275
s 1.1513 log 2 t '
mg f ct rw p
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 40
PETE – 331 Well Testing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE – 331 Production Well Testing
The production tests give stabilized rates of oil, gas and water,
and stabilized flowing pressures.
The oil production rate, water cut, gas oil ratio and well flowing
pressures must be monitored to diagnose problems in the producing
wells and to find solutions for improving production.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE – 331 Simplified Schematic System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
connected to Test Separator
Pressure Gauge pwhf Gas
Gas Rate Measurement
Wellhead T M
sample
for measuring
psp
3 PhaseTest Oil
water cut Separator
M
Water
pr pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE – 331 Simplified Schematic System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
connected to Test Separator
Pressure Gauge pwhf Gas
Gas Rate Measurement
Wellhead M
T
sample
for measuring psp Liquid (Oil+Water)
2 PhaseTest
water cut Separator
M
pr pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 44
PETE – 331 Production Well Testing
The flow rates are usually measured by one of the following systems:
2. Portable (skid mounted) test separator units (used if station test separators
are not available) placed close to the wellheads during the test period.
3. Multiphase meters. Developed and improved in the last 10-20 years. Compared
to conventional separator systems, they save time and space. Expensive
choice if fixed test separators are already available.
4. Production Logging. The flow rates are measured in the borehole. Gives data
for the contribution of each production interval, if the well is producing from
more than one set of perforation. Costly operation. Used for testing the capacity
of different production intervals in the well or for trouble shooting to identify
problems.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE – 331 Production Well Testing
Data Source
Oil Production Rate Separator Flow meter
Multiphase meter
Production log
Gas Production Rate Separator Flow meter
Multiphase meter
Production log
Condensate Production Rate Separator Flow meter
Multiphase meter
Production log
Water Production Rate or Water Cut Separator Flow Meter
Water cut analysis from well head samples
Flowing Pressure Wellhead : Electronic or mechanical gauge
Bottom Hole : Electronic gauge (rarely used)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 46
PETE – 331 Production Well Testing
• Stabilization Time : It must be ensured that the well flows long enough to
reach the stabilized rate and flowing pressure. If rates and pressures are
measured during the transient period, they will be optimistic and
misleading.
During this clean-up period, the flowing pressure will not be stabilized and
it will be increasing as the well cleans up.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE – 331 Production Well Testing
Factors influencing the Validity of Production Tests:
• Critical Flow Conditions: If the well is not flowing at critical flow conditions
(sonic flow), the downstream pressure changes will change the flow rate and the
flowing pressure of the well, and stabilization will be difficult.
To get representative fluids at the test separator for the flow conditions induced
in a test flow period, the durations of the well tests must allow for the
displacement of the fluid which is already in the surface piping, between the well
and the test separator..
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 8
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331
Course Outline:
• Sand Control
• Well Testing
DST Application and Analysis
Measurement of Well Production Rates – Production Tests
• Production Logging
Components of Production Logging Tools
Production Logging Applications
• Well Completion
Methods of Completions
Perforation
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE – 331
Production Logging
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Objective:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE – 331 Production Logging
• Pressure
• Temperature
• Density
• Capacitance
and
• Flow Rate
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Production Logging Tools are used to
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE – 331 Production Logging
water
gas
oil
Only gas is coming from
this perforation.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 8
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Temperature-Logging Tool:
The tool includes a cage, which is open to the wellbore fluid, at the tool’s
bottom end. Inside the cage is a thermistor that senses the surrounding fluid
temperature.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE – 331 Examples for Temperature Log Interpretations
Depth Temp
Geothermal
Gradient
Fluid Entering the Casing from lower Drilling Mud/Workover Fluid leaving
Cement Top 11
intervals by travelling behind casing the Casing
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Explanation for Temperature Log Interpretations:
Formation Liquid (Oil/Water) entering the Wellbore: The formation fluids are initially at reservoir
temperature. When the reservoir liquids enter into the wellbore and move up during production,
they cause an increase in the temperature, above the entry point.
Formation Gas entering the Wellbore: The gas is initially at reservoir temperature. As it gets into
the wellbore, it expands and cools (Joule Thomson effect). As it moves up, its temperature
gradually increases with the geothermal gradient.
Fluid entering the casing from upper intervals: Fluid at upper intervals may travel behind the
casing down to the production perforations if cement bond behind the casing is poor. Since the
fluid temperature is colder in upper intervals, this causes a temperature decrease.
Fluid entering the casing from lower intervals: Fluid at lower intervals may travel behind the
casing up to the production perforations if cement bond behind the casing is poor. Since the
fluid temperature is higher in lower intervals, this causes a temperature increase.
Drilling Mud/Workover Fluid leaving the Casing or Water Injection: If there is mud or workover
fluid loss from the wellbore, this shows a decrease in temperature above the leakage point.
Similarly, if water is injected, there will be a decrease in the temperature until the injection depth.
Cement Top: Right after cementing the casing, cement top behind the casing can be detected
because temperature increases when the cement settles. This heat dissipates with time. 12
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Noise-Logging Tool:
This tool has very sensitive microphones and it “listens” the downhole
noise.
For example, gas bubbling up through liquid in the wellbore creates a noise.
Also liquid and gas entering (production) or leaving (injection) the wellbore
also creates noise.
If there is channeling of fluid behind the casing, the flow often passes
through narrow spaces and constrictions. These “tight spots” cause high
velocities, sudden pressure reductions, and significant flow turbulence. The
noise tool listens to the noise associated with the turbulence. Therefore,
noise logging is an inexpensive way to investigate whether there is
channeling behind the casing in injection or production wells.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Density Measurement Tools:
Gamma ray Density Logging Tool: This tool emits gamma rays which are
deflected by the electron cloud surrounding the nucleus of any atom.
Furthermore, the amount of backscatter (or absorption) is directly related to
the density of the electron cloud and, therefore, to the density.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE – 331 Production Logging
The tool is made of a capacitor, generating signals which changes with the
capacitance level.
Water has the greatest capacitive effect, resulting in the lowest frequency.
Gas has the least capacitive effect, resulting in the highest frequency. The
frequency with oil is intermediate to those of water and gas. However, the oil
frequency is much closer to the gas frequency than to the water frequency.
Consequently, the tool distinguishes principally between water and
hydrocarbons.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Flow Rate Measurement Tools (Spinners):
Diverting-Spinner Flowmeter:
These are the most accurate flow rate measurement devices when the wells
produce multiphase fluids with low total rates and multiphase flows occur. The
flowing stream is diverted through the tool’s barrel which has a small diameter.
Because of the limited clearance between the spinner and the barrel, the flow
velocity is increased and the spinner is turned even for very low flow rates.
Rates as low as 10 to 15 bbl/day can be measured with this spinner types.
Fullbore Spinners:
Used for higher flow rates. The propeller is bigger. The spinners are
centralized so that it always measures the velocity of the fluids at the center of
the wellbore. Spinner element can rotate clockwise or counterclockwise.
Fullbore
spinners
Diverting
spinner
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE – 331 Production Logging
The flow rate of oil, water and gas is obtained for each perforation by combining
the spinner survey with other information from density and fluid capacity
measurement tools, well and fluid property data.
Flow rate (bbl/d)
water oil
Gas
Oil
Water
Gas, oil and water will be moving with different velocities due to their different viscosities and densities.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE – 331 Production Logging
Specially designed spinners are used to measure flow rates and oil, gas and water
volumes in horizontal wells.
Well Completion
Completion Methods
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
• Cased Hole
• Open Hole
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Completion Types
Surface Casing
Intermediate
Casings
Cement
Production
Casing
Advantages:
• It allows for better well control when workover operations ( such as
changing production intervals by cementing and reperforation, setting
casing packers to isolate intervals, etc.) are necessary to increase
productivity, decrease water cut and gas oil ratio.
• Hole integrity is not a problem (especially important for
unconsolidated formations).
• Allows for stimulation (hydraulic fracturing and acidizing) jobs
targeted to specific intervals.
Disadvantages:
• More costly compared to other methods (Rig time and material costs for casing,
cement and perforation operations).
• Cement may cause formation damage, especially in naturally fractured formations
where the fractures increase the productivity of the well.
• The perforations are critical in determining the productivity. If not properly made, it can
limit well’s productivity and cause excessive pressure drop.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 24
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Cased Hole with Liner :
Advantages:
• It has all the advantages stated for Cased Holes (see previous slide).
• Also, there is cost advantage (material and rig time cost for decreasing
the length of the production casing and the cemented interval) which
can be high for deep wells.
• Allows to work in a larger casing diameter size above the liner hanger
depth. This may be useful for some artificial lift systems (pumps and
other downhole accessories) or dual completion strings which may
require large casing sizes.
Disadvantages:
• It has all the disadvantages stated for Cased Holes (see previous slide).
• Also, if the operation is not properly made, the liner hanger may not seal and create
problems.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Cased Hole without Cementing :
The production casing is run but the pay zone is not cemented. External
casing packer is used to cement the upper section without cementing the
payzone. Usually, slotted casing (or liner) is used instead of perforation.
Advantages:
• All of the formation face is open to flow. Therefore, there is no pressure
drop or productivity loss due to the limited entry from perforations.
• The possible formation damage during the cementing of casings is
prevented .
• May be advantageous for naturally fractured reservoirs where
cementing can plug the fractures and perforations may not connect
the natural fracture network with the wellbore after the cementing.
• There is no perforation cost.
Disadvantages:
• Since all of the formation is open to flow, a selective treatment can not be made (such
as cementing or stimulating some section of the open zone) if any problems are
observed during production (such as low productivity, increasing water cut and GOR).
• Slotted casings (or liner) must be prepared before running in the casings (or liner).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Open Hole :
The production casing is not run in hole. Open hole completion can be
applied in consolidated formations (mostly in carbonates), if
production problems and selective treatments targeting a certain section
of the pay zone are not expected.
Disadvantages:
• It does not allow for proper well control when workover operations
(such as changing production intervals by cementing and reperforation,
setting casing packers to isolate intervals, etc.) are necessary to
increase productivity, decrease water cut and gas oil ratio.
• Hole integrity can be a problem (especially for formations which are
not well cemented and unconsolidated).
• It does not allow for stimulation (hydraulic fracturing and acidizing)
jobs targeted to specific intervals.
Advantages:
• Less costly compared to cased hole methods (Rig time and costs for casing,
cement and perforation operations are saved).
• All of the formation face is open to flow. Therefore, there is no pressure drop or
productivity loss due to the limited entry from perforations.
• The possible formation damage during the cementing of casings is prevented .
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 27
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Open Hole
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 28
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Completion Types – Horizontal Wells
Casing is run, cemented to the total depth (TD), perforation made.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 29
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Completion Types – Horizontal Wells
Slotted Casing (or liner) is run to the total depth (TD), but not cemented.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Completion Types – Horizontal Wells
Slotted Casing (or liner) is run to the total depth (TD), but not cemented.
External Casing packers (ECP) are used to allow for operations targeted to specific zones.
Advantage:
Surface Casing Better well control capability due to ECPs.
ECPs allow for the treatment of different sections
separately. Cost for cementing and perforating is saved.
No formation damage and no additional skin from
Intermediate cementing and perforating operations.
Casings Hole integrity is not a problem.
Cased hole (slotted casing (or liner) with external casing packers)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE – 331 Completion Methods
Completion Types – Horizontal Wells
The production casing (or liner) is not run into the pay zone. All of the pay zone is open to flow.
Advantage:
Surface Casing Cost for casing, cementing and perforating is saved.
No formation damage and no additional skin from
cementing and perforating operations. All of the
formation face is open to flow. Therefore, there is no
Intermediate pressure drop or productivity loss due to the limited
Casings entry from perforations or casing slots.
Open hole
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE – 331 Oil Well Completion Example
Tubing Flow –with Packer. The reservoir fluid flows through the production tubing.
Production packer isolates the tubing-casing annulus.
pwhf pdownstream
pr pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE – 331 Oil Well Completion Example
Liquid Level
pbh
Height of Liquid Level =
0.433 liq
q
where pbh = bottom hole pressure, psi
liq = specific gravity of liquid
pr pr (water : 1.0)
pbh height = liquid column height, ft
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE – 331 Oil Well Completion Example
Example 1 for Tubing + Annular Flow
(Not common -
In this example, to produce
separately from two zones when pwhf pdownstream2
it is not possible to have Fluid from
two tubings in the wellbore) Reservoir 2
pdownstream1 pchf
Fluid from
Reservoir 1 CHOKE
CHOKE
WELLBORE
q1
CHOKE
WELLBORE
q1
pr Oil + Gas pr
q2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE – 331
Dual Production Strings - Two production tubings are used to produce from two
different intervals simultaneously. Casing size has to be big enough to allow for two strings.
pwhf
Fluid from Fluid from
Reservoir 2 Reservoir 1
pchf
pr1 q1
pbhf1
pr1
Perforation
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE – 331 Perforation
Perforation is made to establish a flow path between the reservoir and the
wellbore.
With perforation, a hole is created in the casing through the cement and
into the formation to form a channel for the oil and gas to flow from the
reservoir rock into the wellbore.
Reservoir Rock
Damaged Zone Casing Cement
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE – 331 Perforation
Perforating Types:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE – 331 Perforation
• After the perforations, guns can be dropped to the bottom of the wellbore.
(from Oilfield Review, Schlumberger , October 1992)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE – 331 Perforation
Perforating Process:
High pressure jet from the detonation of a
shaped charge penetrates casing, cement
and reservoir rock.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE – 331 Perforation
Shaped Charges:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE – 331 Perforation
• Shot Density
• Phase Angle
• Perforation Penetration
• Perforation Diameter
Shot Density:
Shot density shows the number of perforations per unit length. Commonly
given as shots per foot (spf).
Commonly applied shot densities are 6 and 8 spf. It can be as low as 4 spf or
as high as 32 spf in high density perforations.
As the shot density increases, the performance also increases but the
improvement decreases and casing damage is increased when high densities
are used.
1 ft
4 spf 8 spf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE – 331 Perforation
It is the angle between two successive perforating charges around the gun
axis.
Perforating gun assemblies are commonly available in 0, 60, 90, 120 and 180
degree phasing.
Perforation diameter :
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE – 331 Perforation
Perforation Penetration :
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE – 331 Perforation
• Shot Density
• Perforation Diameter
• Perforation Phasing
and
• Length (Penetration)
Effect of Penetration Depth on Well Production Effect of Phasing Angle on Well Production
(from B.Mating, T.Bodi, Univ.of Miskolc, Evaluation of the Damage Source in
Hydrocarbon Producing Wells to increase the perforation efficiency.)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 54
PETE – 331
END
55
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 9
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331
Course Outline:
• Production Logging
Components of Production Logging Tools
Production Logging Applications
• Well Completion
Methods of Completions
Perforation
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE – 331
Production Problems,
Diagnosis Methods and Solutions
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE – 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE – 331
• Low Productivity
• Excessive Gas Production in Oil Wells
• Excessive Water Production
• Flow Assurance Problems
Asphaltenes
Emulsion
Foaming
Paraffin Deposition
Scaling
Hydrate Formation
Corrosion
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Sustaining and enhancing oil and gas production rates starts from
identifying problems that cause:
• low production rates of wells
• quick decline of the desirable production fluid
• rapid increase in the undesirable fluids
For oil wells these problems include
• Low productivity
• Excessive gas production
• Excessive water production
• Flow assurance problems such as: Sand production, asphaltene and
paraffin deposition, emulsion, foaming, scaling, corrosion
For gas wells, the problems include
• Low productivity
• Excessive water production
• Liquid loading
• Sand production, scaling, corrosion, gas hydrate formation
Although flow assurance problems are relatively easier to identify, well
testing and production logging are frequently needed to identify the causes of
other well problems.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
• Production Logging
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 7
PETE - 331
Field: X
Well : Y
Oil Rate (stb/d)
Water Cut (%)
GOR (scf/stb)
time (monthly)
Low Productivity:
The cause of low productivity in a well can range from fundamental problems
(such as low permeability, high viscosity, skin, low reservoir pressure, etc.) to
restrictions to flow in the near-wellbore vicinity or in the wellbore itself (such
as asphaltene, paraffin deposition, scaling, etc.).
If the well’s actual production rate is lower than its theoretical production rate
predicted by Nodal analysis (assuming that the reservoir inflow model and
the parameters used in the Nodal analysis are correct), this means that the
productivity of the well is lower than expected.
If the reason for lower than expected productivity can be properly identified
and resolved, the productivity of the well can be improved.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 9
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Low Productivity:
The lower than expected well productivity can be attributed to one or more of the following
reasons:
The first five factors affect reservoir inflow performance, that is, deliverability of reservoir.
They can be evaluated by pressure transient data analyses.
The last factor controls well deliverability if the restrictions are in the wellbore. It can be
evaluated using data from production logging. The depth interval with high-pressure gradient
usually indicates restriction to flow, because of the deposition of paraffins, asphaltanes,
scales, or gas hydrates in the production string. If the restriction is in the near wellbore
region, it will appear as skin and it can be evaluated by pressure transient data analyses.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 10
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Low Productivity:
If there is more than one zone open to flow in the wellbore, production
logging can be used to identify zones which have lower than expected
productivities by :
• Identifying the problematic zones which are contributing less than expected
(or not flowing at all)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 11
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Low Productivity:
EXAMPLE 1 (M.J Economides, 1994):
Use of the flow profile to evaluate a
damaged well
• A pressure build up test was run and Figure 1. Temperature and spinner flowmeter-derived
the skin factor found to be 20, while production profile (modified from Economides et al.,
1994)
the kh product was near the expected
value.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 12
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Low Productivity:
EXAMPLE 1 (M.J Economides, 1994):
Use of the flow profile to evaluate a
damaged well
If the reservoir pressure and the bottom hole flowing pressure of an oil well is above the
bubble point, there will not be any gas coming out of solution in the reservoir. Under such
conditions, the oil well will be expected to produce gas in accordance with its solution gas oil
ratio (GOR) [see graph in following slide].
When the flowing bottom hole pressure decreases below the bubble point, an increase will
be expected in the GOR, because gas will come out of solution and because of it’s higher
mobility compared to oil, it will bypass the oil and increase the production gas oil ratio.
Excessive gas production in an oil well is observed if the produced gas volumes (or GOR),
suddenly increase above the values expected from solution gas or pressure decrease below
the bubble point. This usually happens if free gas enters the well from a different gas zone,
gas cap or gas injection well.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE – 331
Expected Producing Gas Oil Ratio (GOR) Profile for an Undersaturated Reservoir:
(Initial reservoir pressure is above the bubble point, it falls below bubble
point after some production)
Pinitial
Pbp
Average
Reservoir Increase in producing GOR as pressure
Pressure drops more and gas coming out of
solution begins flowing to the well,
bypassing the oil
Decrease in producing GOR because the
GOR gas in the reservoir is getting depleted
Constant value (solution GOR) by production
until saturation pressure is reached.
Final GOR is lower than the initial
GOR because the gas content of
Slight decrease in producing GOR when reservoir pressure the remaining oil is reduced
falls below the bubble point pressure. Gas bubbles form in the
reservoir, but gas can not flow until its saturation exceeds
critical gas saturation, so produced oil has less gas.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) time
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Gas Production
Channeling:
Channeling between the casing and the formation caused by poor cement
conditions is sometimes the cause of high gas production rates.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Gas Production
Figure 4. Gas production due to preferential flow through high-permeability zones (Clark and Schultz, 1956)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Gas Production
A well in Reservoir Beta is producing an unusually high gas rate, along with a lower
oil rate, compared with similar wells in the field. What production logs should be run
to determine whether the gas is migrating from the gas cap or a thief zone?
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 21
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Gas Production
Gas Coning :
Gas coning results when a well is completed near a gas/oil contact and sufficient
pressure drawdown exists at the perforations for gas to migrate downward to the
perforations.
Figure 6. Gas production due to gas coning (Clark and Schultz, 1956).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Gas Production
Casing Leaks:
Casing leak occurs when there is a gas zone behind the casing and a
failure in the casings (due to corrosion or manufacturing error) results in
gas entering into the wellbore.
Step 1: Diagnosis
Step 2: Actions
If the produced gas is ‘Free Gas’ coming from another zone, gas cap or
gas injection well:
• Perform squeeze cementing for shutting off gas producing zones or cement repair
behind casing to stop channeling behind casing
• If the gas is coming from a gas injection well, apply gel treatment in the injection
well to plug high permeability channels or apply foam to decrease injected gas
mobility.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Gas Production
Step 2: Actions
• Do nothing
• Increase bottom hole flowing pressure by decreasing flow rate (if economically
feasible)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Excessive water production is usually from water zones or water injection wells,
not from the connate water in the pay zone.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 27
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 28
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
If the cement bond behind the casing is poor, water from other formations
can channel between the casing and the formation and reach the
production perforations.
:
Channeling
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Water Coning :
Water coning takes place in bottom water drive reservoirs. The coning is a
function of: oil and water mobilities, vertical permeability, oil/water density
difference and pressure drawdown at perforations (reservoir pressure and
bottom hole flowing pressure difference) .
If the created hydraulic fracture reaches the water zone, it creates a pathway for
the water to reach producing perforations.
Vertical Wells
In vertical wells, production logs
taken before and after fracturing
Oil Zone operations can indicate vertical
extent of the created fracture
Water
(fracture height).
Horizontal Wells
Oil Zone
Water
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Casing Leaks :
Casing leak occurs when there is a water zone behind the casing and a failure in
the casings (due to factors such as: corrosion, casing manufacturing errors or
leaking casing connections) results in water entering into the wellbore.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Step 1: Diagnosis
Diagnostic Plots:
Production History Plot: Log-log plot of oil and water flow rates are plotted versus time.
Decline Curve: Semi log plot of oil and water production rate versus cumulative oil
production
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Good Water :
Water which can not be shut-off without reducing oil production. Flow of oil and
water takes place together in the reservoir.
Bad Water:
Water which produces no oil or insufficient oil to pay for the cost of handling
the water.
Bad water does not help the oil production. It’s production only depletes the
reservoir energy and costs extra money to produce and dispose.
water
gas
oil
Only gas is coming from
this perforation.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Examples for ‘Bad Water’: (figures from Oilfield Review, Spring 2000, Schlumberger)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Step 2: Actions
If ‘Bad Water’:
• Perform Squeeze Cementing for shutting off zones or cement repair behind casing
• Inject Rigid Chemical gels to plug water zones or channels which are responsible
for water flow into the wellbore
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 43
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Oil zone
Oil
Zone
Water
Water Zone
zone
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Step 2: Actions
If ‘Good Water’:
• Do nothing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 46
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells – Excessive Water Production
Downhole Separator:
They are used to separate the water before it reaches the surface. The lifting,
surface processing and water disposal costs are reduced this way.
A cyclone is used to separate the water.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Gas wells usually produce natural gas carrying liquid water and/or condensate
in the form of mist. As the gas flow velocity in the well drops because of
reservoir pressure depletion, the carrying capacity of the gas decreases.
When the gas velocity drops to a critical level, liquids begin to accumulate in the
well and the well flow can undergo an annular flow regime followed by a slug
flow regime. The accumulation of liquids (liquid loading) in the wellbore
increases the bottom-hole pressure, which reduces gas production rate. A low
gas production rate will cause gas velocity to drop further. Eventually, the well
will undergo a bubble flow regime and stop producing.
• Foaming the liquid water can enable the gas to lift water from the well.
• Using smaller tubing or creating a lower wellhead pressure sometimes can
increase the gas velocity in the wellbore and increased velocity can move the
liquid droplets out from the wellbore.
• The well can be unloaded by gas-lifting or pumping the liquids out of the well.
• Heating the wellbore can prevent condensate formation.
• Down-hole injection of water into an underlying disposal zone is another
option.
Asphaltenes:
Asphaltenes are a compound class, not a single compound, concentrated in the
high-temperature distillation residue of petroleum (> 530°C). Other components
are heavy oils, resins, and high-molecular-weight waxes.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Asphaltenes:
Certain crude oils deposit solid asphaltenes during production. Changes in pressure,
temperature, composition and shear rate may cause asphaltene precipitation and
deposition. These deposits may decrease
permeability in near-wellbore region. It can
also plug the wellbore tubing and valves.
Asphaltenes can also accumulate in
separators and in pipelines.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Asphaltenes:
Heavy oils, those with the greatest asphaltene concentrations, are usually stable
during production, and do not present problems. Asphaltene-precipitation
problems are more common in lighter oils that contain minor amounts of
asphaltenes in reservoirs that are at pressures well above bubble point.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Asphaltenes:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 53
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Asphaltenes:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 54
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 55
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
For tubular and flowline deposits, removal techniques involve chemical methods
such as solvent soaks with or without dispersants.
Physical methods can be used depending on the hardness of the deposit (e.g.,
pigging, hydroblasting, and drilling). Pigging is commonly used for removing
pipeline deposits—often, mixtures of waxes and asphaltenes.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 56
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Emulsion:
An emulsion can be defined as a mixture of two immiscible liquids, one
of which is dispersed as droplets in the other and is stabilized by an emulsifying
agent. The dispersed droplets are known as the internal phase. The liquid
surrounding the dispersed droplets is the external or continuous phase. The
emulsifying agent separates the dispersed droplets from the continuous phase.
In the oil field, oil and water are encountered as the two phases. Two types of
emulsions are observed in oil production:
• water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion (at low water cuts) : Oil is the continuous phase,
water droplets are dispersed in the oil.
or
• oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion (at high water cuts) : Water is the continuous phase,
oil droplets are dispersed in the water.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 57
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Emulsion:
Figure 18. Tight emulsion with small dispersed Figure 19.. Loose emulsion with larger
droplets which have considerable resistance to dispersed droplets (a loose emulsion is less
settling (a tight emulsion is usually a stable stable than tight emulsion because the large
emulsion ( V. Chilingarian et al., 1987) dispersed droplets tend to settle easily ( V.
Chilingarian et al., 1987)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 58
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Emulsion:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 59
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Emulsion:
For creating an oil/water emulsion, oil and water phases need to be sufficiently
agitated to accomplish the required mixing. The reason for the agitation can be
the turbulent flow of the oil and the water through the well casing, tubing, chokes,
subsurface pumps and surface equipment .
Breaking Emulsion:
Crude oil is required to be “treated” to break any emulsion present and to remove
the water which is separated in the process. The factors that enhance the
emulsion breaking include:
• Increasing temperature
• Reducing agitation or shear
• Increasing residence or retention time in separators
• Solids removal
• Adding chemical demulsifiers
• Applying electrical fields that promote coalescence.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 60
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Foaming:
Certain combinations of oil, water and gas can give rise to a condition known as
foaming, especially within the separator, resulting in carry over of liquids into the
gas stream. (McAleese, 2000)
Foaming occurs when pressure is reduced in certain well effluents and causing
the liberation of many tiny bubbles which are covered in a thin film of oil.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 61
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Foaming:
Gas in produced crudes can cause foaming under several different conditions,
such as:
Foam Control:
Antifoams are chemicals which, when added to a foaming system, will orient at
the surface and break the film that stabilizes the foam. The use of chemical
antifoams is the most popular method for foam control.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 62
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Paraffin wax produced from crude oil consists primarily of long chain, saturated
hydrocarbons (linear alkanes/n paraffins) with carbon chain lengths of C18 to C75+,
having individual melting points from 40 to 70°C.
As the temperature of the crude drops below a critical level and/or as the low-
molecular-weight hydrocarbons vaporize, the dissolved waxes begin to form
insoluble crystals.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 63
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Establishing the critical temperature at which these wax nuclei form—the “wax
appearance temperature” (WAT) is important. One key to wax-deposition
prevention is heat. Electric heaters can be employed to raise the crude-oil
temperature as it enters the wellbore.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 64
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Scaling:
As brine, oil, and/or gas proceed from the formation to the surface, pressure and
temperature change and certain dissolved salts can precipitate. This is called
“self-scaling.” If a brine is injected into the formation to maintain pressure and
sweep the oil to the producing wells, additional salts may precipitate in the
formation or in the wellbore.
The most common oilfield scales are calcite, barite, celestite, anhydrite, gypsum,
iron sulfide, and halite.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 66
PETE – 331
Scaling:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 67
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Scaling:
The simplest method of physically detecting scale in the wellbore is to run
calipers down the wellbore and measure decreases in the tubing inner diameter.
Gamma ray log interpretation has been used to indicate barium sulfate scale
because naturally radioactive radium (Ra226) precipitates as an insoluble sulfate
with this scale.
Visual observation with the appropriate wireline tools has also been used to
show the presence of calcite and halite solids within the wellbore.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 68
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Removal of Scales:
When pulling costs are low (e.g., readily accessible and shallow land locations),
often the least expensive approach to scaling is to pull the tubing and drill out the
scale deposit.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 69
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Prevention of Scaling:
Delivering the scale inhibiting chemical solutions into the wellbore can be done
by:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 70
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Hydrate formation:
Natural-gas hydrates are ice-like solids that
form when free water and natural
gas combine at high pressure and “low”
temperature. This can occur in gas and
gas/condensate wells, as well as in oil wells.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 71
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 72
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Hydrate formation:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 73
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Hydrate formation:
Experimental Studies on hydrate formation and inhibition at PVT laboratory at
METU Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 74
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Hydrate formation:
The second control step is the comparison of this information with the measured
or expected PT profile within the production system. A method of coping with
hydrate formation is then selected (e.g., producing the hydrocarbons under
conditions that avoid the hydrate PT formation zone or using a suitable inhibition
method. )
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 75
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
“Thermodynamic inhibition” has been the most common method for controlling gas
hydrates. There are a number of alternatives: heating the gas, decreasing pressure
in the system, injecting salt solutions, and injecting alcohol or glycol.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 76
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Hydrate formation:
If there are no laboratory tests available to determine the hydrate formation
conditions for the produced gas, the available charts in the literature (such as the
diagram below, which is created for methane gas) can be used to have an estimate
for the hydrate formation pressure and temperature.
From figure, note that at high pressures hydrates can form even if the temperature
is high (up to
30oC) .
No hydrate problem
for methane gas
if (P,T) is below
this line
Corrosion:
Iron acts spontaneously with water (corrosion), generating soluble iron ions and
hydrogen gas. Corrosion of steel is an “electrochemical process,” involving the
transfer of electrons from iron atoms in the metal to hydrogen ions or oxygen in
water.
Corrosion:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 79
PETE – 331 Common Problems in Oil and Gas Wells
Reducing/Preventing Corrosion:
- isolate the metal from the corrodant (paints, coatings, and liners)
- employ a metal alloy that is inherently resistant to corrosion
- chemically inhibit the corrosion process
- move the electrical potential of the metal into a region where the corrosion rate is
infinitesimally small (“cathodic protection”)
- use ‘sacrificial anodes’ which are metals which corrode more easily compared to
the material which we want to protect. Replace the sacrificial anodes regularly.
- live with the corrosion & replace the corroded component after failure.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 80
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 81
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 10
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Course Outline:
• Production Logging
• Well Completion
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 2
PETE – 331 Workover Operations
Workover Rigs
Their load capacity is less than drilling rigs because they are not used for running in casing
and drilling long sections. Workover rig load capacities are enough to run in and pull out the
production string (tubing, packer and accessories).
Their drilling capacity is limited (mostly used for drilling the cement in the wellbore)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 3
PETE – 331 Workover Operations
• Perforations / Reperforations
• POOH, RIH and testing of the production string (tubing, packer and
accessories)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 4
PETE – 331 Workover Operations
• Acidizing Operations
• Fishing jobs (for production strings, logging tools, artificial lift equipment etc.)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 5
PETE – 331 Workover Operations
Rigless Operations:
Some operations which involve running and pulling tools and equipment into
and out of the well can be performed without workover rigs, by using
or
• Coiled Tubing
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 6
PETE – 331 Workover Operations
Wireline Operations:
A wireline operation involves running and pulling tools and equipment into and
out of the well using a continuous, small-diameter solid wire (also called
slickline) or braided wire.
Wireline Unit
Common slickline diameters range from 0.066 inches (1.676 mm) to 0.188
inches (4.775 mm).
Slicklines do not have internal conductors. Therefore, they can not transfer data
to the surface. Also, slicklines have less strength compared to braided wires.
Monocable
The conductor wires are protected by a jacket and inner/outer
armor.
9
PETE – 331
Coiled Tubing
Coiled tubing is a flexible, continuous steel
Coiled tubing reel
pipe spooled on a reel.
Course Outline:
• Production Logging
• Well Completion
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 12
PETE – 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 13
PETE – 331
Well Head
Separation Systems
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 14
PETE – 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 15
PETE – 331
Objectives:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 16
PETE – 331 Well Production String
Tubing
Packers
Flow Control Accessories
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 17
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
• Tubing Size
• Tubing Material
• Tubing Connectors/Joints
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 18
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Tubing Size:
Tubing is classified according to the outside diameter, the steel grade, unit weight
(wall thickness), length and type of joints[1]. Moreover, API defines tubing size
using outside diameter (OD) and weight (per foot). The weight of the tubing
determines the inside diameter (ID).
Commonly used tubing strings have outside diameters (OD) of 2 3/8 to 4 ½ in,
but tubings are available from 1.050 in to 20 in.
The casing size, expected flow rate, flow velocity, frictional losses and artificial
lift requirements must be considered in selecting the tubing size.
If the selected tubing is too small, it will limit the production and increase the
frictional losses.
If the selected tubing is too large, the flow velocity will be decreased and this
may result in liquid loading. Increasing the tubing size will also increase the cost.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 19
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Tubing Lengths:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 20
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Most tubings are steel. In corrosive environments Corrosion Resistant Alloys (CRA)
can also be used. CRA tubings are more expensive compared to steel tubings.
In API nomenclature, tubing materials (API grade) are specified with a letter and a
number, such as: H40, J55, C75, N80, C90, P100. The letter defines various steel
types. The number indicates the minimum yield strength of the steel in thousand psi.
(Example: J55 Grade tubings have 55,000 psi minimum yield strength)
External Upset End (EUE) Tubing and Coupling – Most widely used.
Tubings have increased wall thickness at the connections (see figure in the
next slide). EUE joint has a strength greater than the pipe body’s strength.
Non-upset End (NUE) Tubing and Coupling – Used much less than EUE
tubing. The cost of NUE is slightly less than EUE but its joint strength is
substantially less. The coupling joint diameter of NUE is less than EUE,
which offers some advantages if the tubing/casing clearance is small.
Integral Joint Tubing – It’s joint strength is less than the pipe body’s
strength. This restricts its use. It has smallest OD, compared to EUE and
NUE. It’s small OD may be advantageous for some applications.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 22
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 23
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Most economical tubing size and grade which meets the above conditions is
selected to be used.
(table from SPE Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Volume IV, pg 115, 2007)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 24
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Collapse Resistance, Internal Yield Pressure and Joint Yield Strength for
API Tubings are given in Minimum Performance Property tables:
At any point, the tubing design must satisfy the below criteria:
1. Net external pressure must be less than Collapse Resistance (axial load corrected)
2. Net internal pressure must be less than Internal Yield Pressure
3. Buoyant Tensile Load must be less than Joint Yield Strength
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 25
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
The axial tension load is due to the hook load of the tubing string.
Main component in the hook load is the weight of the tubing string.
The highest tensile load normally occurs at the top (surface) of the well.
Buoyancy reduces the tension load. It is sometimes ignored in shallow wells, but it
must be included in deeper wells.
Any overpull will increase the tension load (such as overpull to free the packer).
The Joint Yield Strength of the tubing (obtained from minimum performance
property tables) is divided by the calculated hook load to calculate the design factor.
If the design factor is above 1.6 (for tubing weight in air) or 1.25 (based on total
hook load including overpull), the selected tubing meets the tension load criteria.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 26
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Checking for Collapse Load:
The highest collapse load for the tubing will be at the bottom of
the well above the packer. At this point, the maximum pressure
outside the tubing is the hydrostatic pressure of the workover fluid
column [P2] and the minimum pressure inside the tubing is
atmospheric [P1] (if tubing string is empty and open to
atmosphere).
P2 P1
The collapse resistance given in the tubing Minimum Performance Property tables
are for tubings without any tension load (pc). Therefore, they need to be corrected
for the axial tension load.
Without With
Axial Load: Axial Load:
2
S S
pcc pc 1 0.75 A 0.5 A
Ym Ym
W
where pc pcc
SA
A pcc = the collapse pressure corrected for axial tension load
pc = the collapse pressure with no axial tension load
Ym = minimum yield strength
SA = axial strength at any point in the tubing string
W = total weight of the tubing string
A = cross sectional area of the tubing pc > pcc
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 28
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Tubings
Checking for Burst Load:
Tubing burst is expected if the difference between the inner pressure and outer pressure of the
tubing (P1-P2 or P3-P4) is more than the tubing’s internal yield pressure (burst resistance). Burst
load should be checked by comparing maximum expected pressure inside the tubing with
minimum expected pressure in the annulus.
High burst tubing loads typically occur near the surface where the annulus pressure [P2] is very
little or zero and tubing pressure [P1] is maximum during shut-in periods or during well
stimulation treatments where fluid is injected into the wellbore with high
wellhead pressures.
The burst tubing load should also be checked for the bottom hole conditions
where the annulus pressure [P4] may be zero (as sometimes observed
in pumping wells where annulus is open to the atmosphere) and tubing
pressure [P3] may be maximum (such as tubing filled with the produced fluid).
The Internal Yield Pressure [Burst resistance] of the tubing (obtained from
minimum performance property tables) is divided by the calculated burst
loads (P1-P2) and (P3-P4) to calculate the design factor. If the design factor
is above 1.25, the selected tubing meets the burst load criteria.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 29
PETE – 331
Tubing
Packers
Flow Control Accessories
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 30
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
Packers:
Packer is a sealing device which isolates the produced fluids and pressure
from the casing above or below the producing zone. Packers can be used both
in open holes and cased holes.
Examples for Packer Applications:
Reservoir fluid
Bridge Plug
Production Packer isolating Production Packers for multiple Packers isolating the produced
the produced fluid and producing zones, isolating fluid and pressure from the
pressure from the casing the produced fluids and pressures casing above and isolating
above of two different zones from each the water producing perforations
other and from the casing above below.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 31
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
In addition to providing a seal between the tubing and casing, other benefits
of packers are:
• Perform well safety control on the surface only through the tubing (instead of
tubing and casing)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 32
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 33
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
Retrievable Packers – These packers can be set and retrieved many times.
Compared to permanent packers, retrievable packers cost more. Their
advantage is their multiple use and ease of removal.
Retrievable packers are used in applications where the packer is used
temporarily, such as well tests, selective acid and chemical injection
applications, squeeze cementing applications and also in production strings
where low temperature low pressure production is expected.
Permanent Packers - They can only be removed from the wellbore by milling.
Compared to retrievable packers, permanent packers are simpler in design
and their performance are better especially at high pressures and
temperatures.
Permanent packers are used if the packer application is not temporary, such
as in production wells, especially in high pressure high temperature
applications.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 34
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
Liquid Level
pbh
Height of Liquid Level =
0.433 liq
q
where pbh = bottom hole pressure, psi
liq = specific gravity of liquid
pr pr (water : 1.0)
pbh height = liquid column height, ft
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 35
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
Generally, both retrievable and permanent packers are run and set together with the
production tubing string. First, the slips are activated by applying compression or by
rotating the tubing string. After the slips grip the casing wall, the packers are set by
applying compression or tension to expand the packing element.
Some Packers can be set hydraulically, by applying pressure through the tubing string.
Sometimes, it may be necessary to install the packer in the wellbore first, and then run
the production string. After installing the packer, the production tubing is run with a
sealing device attached to the end and it is connected to the packer.
If the packer needs to be installed without the production tubing, it can be set with a
work string* or on electric wireline. Electric wireline setting is advantageous compared
to work string because the installation is faster and more accurate. If the wellbore is
inclined at a high angle, wireline setting may not be possible and work string may need
to be used.
* ’’ Work string’’ in workover rigs are the tubulars used for workover operations (similar to drill pipes
in drilling rigs and production tubing in production operations).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 36
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 37
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Packers
Bridge Plugs:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 38
PETE - 331
Tubing
Packers
Flow Control Accessories
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 39
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
Various flow control accessories are used in the production string which
allow for different applications. These accessories can be very useful in
performing various control and testing operations in the life of the well.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 40
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 41
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
• plugs
• check valves
• bottomhole chokes
• downhole flow regulators and
• bottom hole pressure recorders
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 42
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
Sliding Sleeves:
Flow Couplings:
They are short tubing segments which have thicker walls compared to
the production tubing.
They are installed above and below any flow control device (such as
safety valves, bottomhole choke, sliding sleeve) to protect the tubing.
Because of the turbulence created by the restrictions of flow control
devices, erosional velocities can be reached before or after these
restrictions. This may damage (erode) the tubing.
The flow couplings do not stop the erosion, however, because of their
thick cross section, it will extend the life of the completion (it takes longer time
to erode the thicker tubing in the flow couplings).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 44
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
Blanking Plugs:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 45
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
Bottomhole Choke:
They are flow control devices which are placed inside profile seating nipples.
They are not commonly used.
Bottomhole choke restricts flow in the tubing string and allows control of
production from different zones. They are mainly used in very high pressure
flowing wells where surface choke may create freezing problems.
If a catastrophic failure occurs on the surface and the wellhead or surface flow
lines are damaged (because of accidents, natural disasters or sabotage), the
subsurface safety valve automatically shuts off the flow in the wellbore to
avoid disaster by the uncontrollable flow of the well.
Subsurface safety valves are required in naturally flowing oil and gas wells,
especially for high flowing pressures.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 47
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
During the Gulf War (1991) in Kuwait, over 650 wellheads were
sabotaged and wells were set on fire. The economical and
environmental impact was drastic. If the wells had subsurface
safety valves, the impact would be much less.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 48
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
These valves are installed and retrieved with wireline, to a profile seating nipple
in the tubing string below the tubing hanger.
The valve requires a change in the operating conditions to activate the closure
mechanism. Two models exist:
Velocity Activated Valve: The valve is normally open. Flow goes through an
orifice, which creates a pressure drop. If the wellhead or the surface pipes are
destroyed, the tubing head flowing pressure will be reduced to atmospheric
pressure. This will increase the drawdown and the flow rate of the well will be
increased. The increased flow rate will increase the pressure drop in the valve.
The valve is calibrated to be activated (closed) when pressure drop across the
valve reaches to a certain value. Therefore it closes and stops the flow when this
pressure drop is reached.
Low pressure Valve: The valve is normally closed. The valve is calibrated to
open at a certain bottom hole pressure. If the well suddenly begins to flow with
very high rates as a result of damage on the surface, the bottom hole pressure
decreases below the calibrated value and the valve closes, stopping the flow.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 49
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
The SCSSVs are also installed in the tubing string below the surface tubing
hanger, however they are controlled (opened and shut) by hydraulic pressure
through a control line which connects the subsurface valve to a surface control
panel.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 50
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE – 331 Well Production String - Flow Control Accessories
Tubing
Control line Flow Coupling
SCSSV
Flow Coupling
Packer
(figure from SPE Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Volume IV, pg 74, 2007)
Wireline Entry Guide
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 52
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 53
PETE 331
Petroleum Production Engineering I
Session 11
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Course Outline:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Wellhead
Wellhead
Wellhead is defined as the surface equipment below the master valve of the
christmas tree.
It includes:
• Casing Head(s)
• Tubing Head
• Casing Valves
• Pressure Gauges
to measure annulus
pressures
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Wellhead
Casing Heads:
The casing head is a mechanical assembly used for hanging a casing string.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Wellhead
Tubing Head:
A tubing head adapter is used to connect the christmas tree to the tubing head.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Christmas Tree
Christmas Tree:
Christmas tree is used to control the flow rate from the well.
In artificial lift systems where the expected flowing pressures are very low, simple
systems are used instead of christmas trees.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Wellhead
Some Wellhead examples seen in oil and gas wells in the fields:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331
Surface Gathering systems:
All wells are connected to a gathering (processing) station where the produced
fluids are treated before being sent to storage tanks.
• Treats oil and gas to meet pipeline standards (dehydration, removal of CO2,
H2S from gas)
• Holds the oil field personnel who monitor the wells and perform production,
storage, and transportation operations
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Simplified Schematic Production System for a Single Flowing Oil Well
Gas
T M
Water Pump
pr pr
pbhf
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Examples for Production Systems in Small and Large Fields
Oil
Oil Gas Gas
Station 2
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Connecting Wells to Gathering Stations
There may be different applications in the field to connect the wells to the Gathering
Stations:
CASE A:
Wells are directly connected to the gathering
station manifold.
Advantage:
• Wells are not effected by each other’s
production.
• Each well can be tested individually.
Disadvantage:
• Higher cost, because separate flow lines are
needed for each well. Especially important
if wells are not close to the station
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Connecting Wells to Gathering Stations
CASE B:
Wells are connected to the same flow
line which connects them to the
gathering station manifold.
Advantage:
• Less cost because less flowline is used.
Disadvantage:
• Wells are effected by each other’s
production unless they are on critical flow.
• Wells can not be tested individually, unless all other wells are shut-in.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Connecting Wells to Gathering Stations
CASE C:
A group of wells are first connected to a
manifold and then connected to the Gathering
Station with a production line and test line.
Advantage:
• All wells flow into same line pressure at the
manifold. They are not effected by other well’s
production.
• Cost. Instead of separate lines from each well
to the station, there is one line connecting the
manifold to the station.
Disadvantage:
• If a separate test line is not used, wells
can not be tested individually, unless other
wells are shut-in.
Generally, wells far from the station are connected with manifolds (CASE C) and wells
very close to the station are connected directly to the station manifolds (CASE A).
Connecting wells on the same flow line (CASE B) is undesired because of well testing
limitations and back pressure of other wells connected to the same flow line.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Manifolds
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331
Separation Systems
Separators
Dehydrators
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separation Systems
• Oil,
• Gases,
• Water,
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Separators:
Oil field separators can be classified into two types based on the number of
phases to separate:
1. Two-phase separators, which separate gas from liquid. They are generally used
to separate gas from oil in oil fields, or gas from water for gas fields.
2. Three-phase separators, which separate gas, oil and water. They are used to
separate the gas from the liquid phase, and water from oil.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Separator Types:
• Horizontal
Single Tube
Double Tube
• Vertical
• Spherical
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
1. Inlet :
Fluid enters the separator and it either goes
into a centrifugal inlet device or it hits an inlet diverter. This is the section
where the primary separation of liquid and gas is made.
The centrifugal inlet device can create a centripetal acceleration which can be
up to 500 times higher than the gravitational acceleration. If an inlet diverter is
used instead of a centrifugal inlet device, the fluid hits the inlet diverter,
causing a sudden change in momentum and initial separation of liquid and
gas takes place. The separated liquid falls down to the settling section.
2. Settling Section:
The settling section of a separator is a large open space required for the
gravity segregation of liquid and gas (for two phase separators) or oil, gas and
water (for three phase separators). This section must be large enough to
keep the produced fluid inside for a few minutes (retention time) until the
separation takes place or to handle liquid slugs.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
3. Outlet:
After the settling section, the liquid leaves the vessel through the dump valve.
This valve is controlled by a level controller. When the liquid level inside the
separator reaches a certain height, a level controller activates the valve and the
valve opens, flowing the liquid out from the separator.
The gas moves up in the settling section and leaves the separator from the gas
outlet. Before leaving the separator, the gas passes through a mist eliminator.
The mist eliminator captures and brings together (coalesce) the very small
liquid droplets in the gas stream which do not settle our by gravity before it
leaves the separator.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Horizontal Separators:
Single Tube :
Most commonly used
horizontal separator type.
Double Tube :
Consists of two tube
sections. Upper tube
contains baffles.
The free liquid is
immediately drained
away to the lower tube.
In can handle higher liquid capacities compared to single tube.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Horizontal Separators:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Design Level
Liquid
for Liquid
Liquid Level
change because Liquid
of slugging
(surging)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
3 Phase separators are commonly used for well testing and for streams where
water can be easily separated from oil or condensate.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
• Higher efficiency for high GOR, foaming wells and oil/water separation.
Disadvantages:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Vertical Separators:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Vertical Separators:
Vertical Separators are mostly
used for medium or low GOR
wells and streams with large
amount of slugging.
Advantages:
• They occupy less floor space. This can
be advantageous if space is limited ,
such as in offshore platforms.
Disadvantages:
• Compared to horizontal separators, they
are more costly to fabricate, ship and
install in skid-mounted assemblies. Two Phase Vertical Separator Three Phase Vertical Separator
• Lower efficiency for high GOR streams and Oil/water separation due to lower
interface area. (figures from www.kwintl.com)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Spherical Separators:
They have limited efficiency for surging wells and liquid settling
action.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Separator Selection:
Experience shows that for high-pressure separators used for treating high gas/oil
ratio well streams, the gas capacity is usually the controlling factor for separator
selection.
However, for low-pressure separators used for well streams with low gas/oil
ratios, liquid capacity may be the controlling factor.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
q A 2
Note:
Average Values can be used for K from Table 10.1
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Substituting Equation 1 into Equation 2 and applying real gas law gives:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Separator Selection – Calculation of Liquid Capacity: (1/2)
Liquid must stay in the separator for a sufficient time to reach equilibrium
conditions between gas and oil phase at the temperature and pressure of the
separator.
Retention time of the liquid within the vessel determines liquid capacity of a
separator:
where qL = liquid capacity, bbl/day
1,440 VL
qL VL = liquid settling volume, bbl
t = retention time, min (use Table 10.2)
t
Use Low Pressure Values for:
Working pressure = 125 psi or less
Liquid Settling Volume (VL) is given in tables 10.3 to 10.8 in Guo et al, for different
separator types and diameter/lengths.
The calculated Liquid Capacity of the separator is compared with the actual well
liquid flow rate to see if the selected separator size is correct.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Gas Density : 1 lbm/ft3 (at separator conditions, 250 psia & 70 deg F)
• Can a vertical oil/gas separator with a diameter of 20 inches and a height of 10 feet be used?
• Can a horizontal oil/gas separator with a diameter of 20 inches and length of 10 feet be used?
(Assume ½ full horizontal separator)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Solution:
2.4 D 2 K p l g
First, check the gas capacity of the separators:
qst
1. Required gas capacity: 5 MMscfd (given) z T 460 g
2a. Gas Capacity of a vertical (20 inches x 10 feet ) separator:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Solution:
Then, check the liquid capacity of the separators:
1,440 VL
1. Required liquid capacity: 5 MMscfd x 100 bbl / MMscf) = 500 bbl/day
qL
2a. Liquid Capacity of a vertical (20 inches x 10 feet ) separator: t
VL = 0.82 bbl (from Table 10.3, page 122, for oil/gas separators)
t = 1 min (from Table 10.2, page 122, for oil/gas separation)
VL = 1.80 bbl (from Table 10.5, page 123, for ½ Full separators)
t = 1 min (from Table 10.2, page 122, for oil/gas separation)
Conclusion for liquid capacity: Both vertical (1181 bbl/d) and horizontal (2592 bbl/d)
separators can handle more liquid volume than the required liquid capacity (500 bbl/d).
RESULT: Horizontal separator satisfies the gas and liquid flow rate requirements.
Vertical separator satisfies liquid rate requirement, but it can not satisfy gas flow rate requirement.
Therefore, Horizontal Separator can be used, but Vertical Separator can not be used for the given case.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
The increase in liquid recovery for two stage separation over one stage
separator usually varies from 2 to 12 %. Depending on the PVT properties of
the produced fluid, the increase in liquid recoveries can be as high as 20-25 %.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Separators
Optimum separator pressures which will give highest liquid volume in stock tank conditions are
determined by laboratory tests and use of computer models (PVT software).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331
Separation Systems
Separators
Dehydrators
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Dehydration Systems
Dehydration Systems:
Natural gas produced from the separators still contain some water vapor which
is in gas phase at the separator pressure and temperature conditions.
This water vapor may condense in the pipeline when the temperature and pressure
conditions change.
Gas pipelines normally require water content to be in the range of 6-8 lbm/MMscf.
Dehydration systems are designed to separate the water vapor from the natural
gas before it is transported with pipeline.
The water content can be harmful for the pipelines for the following facts:
1. Liquid water and natural gas can form gas hydrates and plug the pipelines.
2. Water causes corrosion, also, if there is CO2 and H2S in the gas, they can be
corrosive if liquid water is present.
3. Liquid water can settle in lower sections of the pipeline and decreases flow
efficiency by increasing pressure drop.
4. Water content decreases the heating value of natural gas.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Dehydration Systems
There are four basic methods for dehydrating or "drying" natural gas. These are:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Dehydration Systems
The ability of natural gas to contain water vapor decreases as the temperature is
lowered at constant pressure (see figure on the next slide).
During the cooling process, the excess water in the vapor phase becomes liquid,
and it is removed from the system. Gas with lower water vapor content is the
output from the cooling unit.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Dehydration Systems
Solid desiccants have very large surface areas per unit weight. They hold the
water on their surface. Most common solid adsorbents are silica, alumina and
certain silicates known as molecular sieves. Practically, all the water can be
removed by solid desiccants (water content < 1.0 lb/MMcf). Because of their high
drying ability they are used where high efficiencies are required. The
disadvantage is high initial and operating cost compared to liquid desiccants.
Moisture absorbing liquids can be used to dehydrate natural gas. When these
liquids come in contact with natural gas, they absorb the water. The contacting is
usually achieved in packed or trayed towers. Glycols are widely used as effective
liquid desiccants. Triethylene Glycol (TEG) is the most commonly used glycol for
the dehydration of natural gas. Dehydration by liquid desiccants (TEG) is
economically more attractive than using solid desiccants, if the liquid desiccants
is capable of meeting the required dew point.
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Dehydration Systems
Methods for Dehydration:
2. A glycol-gas contactor (absorber) allowing the gas to flow upward through the
trays, while glycol flows downward in the column. Gas contacts the glycol on
each tray and glycol absorbs the water vapor from the gas.
3. A glycol regenerator for evaporating the water in the glycol and reconcentrating
the glycol to be used again.
4. Glycol pumps to pump the reconcentrated glycol back to the top of the glycol-gas
contactor (absorber).
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Dehydration Systems
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Dehydration Systems
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016) 51
PETE – 331
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Offshore Production Systems
Different offshore production systems are used depending on the sea depth:
Depth
(from: http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/offshore/deepwatr/options.html)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Offshore Production Systems
Different offshore production systems are used depending on the sea depth
(continued from last slide):
Depth
(from: http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/offshore/deepwatr/options.html)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Offshore Production Systems
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Offshore Production Systems
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Offshore Production Systems
(from: http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/offshore/deepwatr/options.html)
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Offshore Production Systems
Fixed Platforms:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE – 331 Offshore Production Systems
Subsea Completions:
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)
PETE - 331
END
Middle East Tech. Univ. Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Dept. (2015-2016)