Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Introduction
2. Basics
2.1. Crystallography
X-rays are produced when high speed electrons are decelerated by interaction within
solid matter. Thus to generate X - rays we need:
1
• a source of electrons
• a possibility to accelerate the emitted electrons
• a target to decelerate the electrons to create X-rays
The device for generating X - rays is called an X - ray tube, see figure 2. The
electrons are produced by an electrically heated tungsten filament. The electrons are
accelerated towards the target by applying a large potential difference (voltage)
between the filament and the target.
The electrons hitting the target(anode) transfer their kinetic by scattering processes.
The transferred energy can excite the solid in various ways, in majority: (i) increase of
temperature (lattice vibrations - phonons); (ii) emission of radiation with different
energies; (iii) inner shell ionization of atoms. The emission of radiation with different
energies results in a continuous spectrum of X-ray radiation, often called as
“Bremsstrahlung” (the German word “Bremsstrahlung” can be translated as “radiation
by braking”). The inner shell ionization of atoms is the starting point for the emission
of characteristic radiation. The inner shell electron vacancy can be filled by another
electron from an electron level higher in energy. The released energy is used up by
the emission of a photon with an energy which is equal to the energy difference
between the two involved electron levels. This type of radiation is known as
characteristic radiation.
Figure 2 displays the typical resulting X-ray spectrum. In the example two sharp
peaks (characteristic radiation) are superimposed on the background radiation
(Bremsstrahlung).
2
Figure 1:
X - ray spectrum of Molybdenum showing Kα and Kβ lines
superimposed by the continuous spectrum. The
wavelengths of the lines are characteristic of the target
element (here Mo)
The interaction of incident X - ray beam with atoms (for example in solids) results in
the scattering of the X-rays. In case of elastic scattering processes (wave length is
not changed) then interference phenomena may occur. The result is a spatial
modulation of the intensity of the scattered radiation. An illustrative representation of
the results of the kinematic scattering theory for ordered arrangements of atoms is
Bragg’s law (Fig 4).
Fig 4:
Illustration of Braggs’s law
The parameter - the lattice spacing - is the distance between a family of planes
with the same Miller index; is the wave length of the X-rays; is the
corresponding diffraction angle and is the order of diffraction. The fulfilment of
Bragg’s law within the experimental parameters is a geometrical prerequisite for the
observation of an interference maximum showing up as maximum intensity.
However, the law gives no information on the absolute value of the intensity which
can be expected for a certain family of planes. The intensity is determined by a
3
number of factors from the experimental setup but also by materials properties itself.
The most prominent factor is the structure factor, which summarizes the influence of
the inner structure (motif) of a crystalline lattice. Starting from Bragg’s law it is
possible to discuss different experimental setups using the relationship, for example:
determination of wavelength ( , known) or determination of ( , known).
The most common setup of an X-ray diffraction experiment is the determination of
different lattice spacings for an unknown sample based on the measurement of the
scattered intensity versus diffraction angle at a fixed wavelength .
The measurement result is plotted in a graph where the x-axis is 2 and the y-axis is
the corresponding measured intensity. This figure is called diffractogram or diffraction
pattern. An example for a two-phase material is given in figure 5. The coloured dots
assign the intensity maxima (diffraction peaks) found to -values of the respective
phases.
The assignment of the diffraction peaks to a certain material is typically done using a
data base with crystal structure data of solids. Common software packages include
control procedures for the measurement itself but also search instruments to index
the measured diffraction pattern. The most comprehensive data base is the PDF
(Powder Diffraction File) published by the ICDD (International Centre for Diffraction
Data). The data for a crystalline phase are summarized in a data set (PDF card –
historically it was indeed a card with data) including mainly the following data:
• PDF number
• Interplanar spacings and relative intensities of the corresponding reflexes
• Chemical formula
• Chemical name and mineralogical name
4
• Unit cell data (lattice constants & angles; Bravais lattice, space group)
• Quality mark & experimental conditions
5
beam (point source on the circumference) is scattered at the sample and all partial
beams fulfilling the Bragg equation are focused back to one point on the
diffractometer circle. In this way the influence of the beam divergence on the
accuracy of the measurement of the scattering angle θ is minimized.
The change of the scattering angle θ is realized either by a movement of the sample
with θ combined with a detector movement of 2θ at the same time (θ-2θ-goniometer)
or by a fixed sample and moving tube and detector, each with θ (θ-θ-goniometer). It
need to be mentioned that in Bragg Brentano only those lattice planes contribute to
the observed intensity which are aligned parallel to the sample surface.
6
Figure 8: Example for X-ray beam optics [2]
To reduce the axial divergence a Soller slit can be inserted in the beam. The distance
of one plate to the next one is around ten times of the thickness of one plate. The
ratio of the length of a plate and the distance reduce the divergence to around ± 2.5°.
The application of the Soller slit is accompanied by a certain intensity loss, however,
the accuracy within θ will be improved further, resulting in an increased height/width
ratio of the observed diffraction peaks.
A further element improving the measurement results is a monochromator (in fig. 10
implemented on the secondary side). The usage of a curved crystal results in a
second focusing condition which is fulfilled only by Cu Kα lines and beam parts with a
certain limitation of the divergence.
Goniometer - circle:
The distance R of the sample to the tube and the detector entry slit is typical around
30 cm. With decreasing R the resolution turns worse, but the intensity will be
increased.
Detector slit:
It should be as small as possible, but if the slit gets too small, the intensity decreases
further without a change in the resolution.
Sample holder:
The sample can be fixed or rotating. The rotation can improve the statistics of the
measurement. The size of the sample should be in the range of the illuminated area
or larger to avoid diffraction peaks from the sample holder.
7
2.5.2. Grazing Incidence Diffraction
This setup is used for the analysis of polycrystalline thin films. In case of grazing
incidence diffraction the incoming beam is running nearly parallel to the sample
surface. The angle between the surface and the beam is typically chosen below 3°.
This angle is kept constant throughout the experiment, only the detector is moving,
refer to figure 9.
substrate
Because the beam is incident at a small angle, the penetration depth of the beam is
limited to within about 100 nm of the sample surface. The illuminated volume is thus
concentrated to a volume covering a large surface area multiplied by a rather small
depth. Therefore the method is especially suitable for the analysis of thin films. It
needs to be mentioned that in this measurement geometry the normal of lattice
planes contributing to the diffracted intensity change their direction during the
variation of 2θ.
8
3. Questions for Preparation of the XRD lab (self study)
4. Ressources
Lecture “Physical Materials Analysis”; files in the download area for the lab course
Image Sources:
[1] http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/of01-041/htmldocs/images/xrdschem.jpg
[2] Modified from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/of01-041/htmldocs/images/xraydiff.jpg
[3] L. Spieß et al.: Moderne Röntgenbeugung.