Nama :

NIM:

No Penulis, Nama
Definisi
Jurnal, Tahun, Judul Dimensi Alat analis Hasil Jenis Variabel
Konsep
Vol. ISSN
1 Adel Ismail Al- Organizationa Knowledge - Prosesed The Analysis The study was (X1) : Trust
Alawi, Journal Of l culture and can be defined - Leadership of Variance conducted in three (X2) Comunication
Knowledge knowledge as a - Reward System (ANOVA) different phases: the between on Staff
Management, 2007, sharing: combination of - Information procedure first phase was (X3) : Information system
Vol. 11, ISSN critical experience, System with one concerned with (X4) ; Reward System
1367-3270 success values, factor one- identifying the major (X5) : Organization
factors contextual way ANOVA) aspects of knowledge structure
information test was used sharing in (Y) : Knowledge Sharing
and expert to compare organizations and the
insight that the means of fundamental
help evaluate the five organizational
and factors culture factors that
incorporate between impacted knowledge
new respondents sharing
experience and who assessed
information knowledge
(Gammelgaard sharing as
and Ritter, excellent,
2000). good or poor.
Knowledge not
only exists in
documents and
repositories,
but it becomes
embedded in
people’s minds
overtime and it
is
 demonstrated
through their
actions and
behaviours.
2 Bernard Lim, Examining the Alvesson - Behaviours and The In this article, claims (X) ; Organizational
Leadership & organizational (1989) artefacts research made that a relationship Cultrue
Organization culture and suggested that - Values use of various exists between (Y) ; Performance link
Development organizational conceptualizati - Basic assumption measures of organizational
Journal, 1995, Vol. performance ons of culture and culture and
16, ISSN 0143- link organizational long-term performance have
7739 culture exist economic been
along a performance examined by
continuum data; each reviewing some of
extending study was the research in this
from the built on the area
instrumental to findings of the
the academic. preceding
Two extremes investigation
of so as
this conceptual to better
continuum are examine the
the process- nature of the
oriented and relationship
classification
approaches.
3 Michael O’Toole, The This study was - Location After the As a result of this (X1) Relationship
Journal of Safety relationship conducted - Bussiness group survey was survey, the subject (X2) : Employee
Research, 2001, between using a - Job categories completed, the company is (Y) :Safety
Vol. 2, ISSN 0022- employees’ modified - Company length author had the developing plans for (Y) :Organization Culture
4375 perceptions version of the of service opportunity to further altering
of safety and Minnesota - age investigate the their safety
organizational Perception lowerthan- management system
culture Survey, which expected to include a process
was originally response rates to more directly
developed by at a number of involve drivers in the
Bailey and the company’s safety process. After
Peterson for locations. those initiatives have
the railroad been in place for 18–
industry. 24 months, the
The survey company
used in this plans to conduct
project was another Employee
developed and Safety Perception
validated by Survey using an
Dr. Brooks appropriate
Carder for use quasiexperimental
232 M. design to be able to
O’Toole / attribute changes in
Journal of the safety
Safety management system
Research 33 to
(2002) 231– both employee
243 perceptions, as well
in a number of as changes to injury
different rates over time.
manufacturing
industries. The
subject
company is a
mining and
construction
products
company
headquartered
in Houston,
TX. Like many
others, this
company
struggles with
its safety
efforts and
uses OSHA,
MSHA, and
the DOT
compliance as
the engines
that drive the
safety
program.