Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
From Fig.4 - Burial Factor for Earth Load Circumferential Stress, Be , API
S = 14,000 psi RP 1102
SHi (Barlow) £ Allowable Stress ® OK Be = 1.340
C. Impact Factor, Fi, and Applied Design Surface Pressure, w Bd/ D = 1.00
H = 6.56 ft From Fig.5 - Excavation Factor for Earth Load Circumferential Stress,
Ee , API RP 1102
From Fig. 7 - Recommended Impact Factor Versus Depth, API
RP 1102 :
Ee = 0.83
Fi = 1.453
Applied design surface pressure, w :
So, the circumferential stress at the pipeline invert caused by earth load :
Critical case = Tandem Axles
Page 1 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
Pavement Type = Rigid Pavement
S He =K He Be Ee γ D
Design Wheel Load from Tandem Axles, Pt (kips) : 20
Applied Design Surface Pressure, w (psi) : 138.89 SHe = 533.24 psi
Page 2 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
D. Cyclic Stresses, DSHh and DSLh
D.1 Cyclic Circumferential Stress, DSHh D.2 Cyclic Longitudinal Stress, DSLh
From Fig. 14 - Highway Stiffness Factor for Cyclic Circumferential From Fig. 16 - Highway Stiffness Factor for Cyclic Longitudinal Stress, K Lh
Stress, KHh , API RP 1102. , API RP 1102.
tw/ D = 0.03731 tw/ D = 0.03731
Er = 5 ksi KHh = 10.00 Er = 5 ksi KLh = 10.00
From Fig. 15 - Highway Geometric Factor for Cyclic From Fig. 17 - Highway Geometric Factor for Cyclic Longitudinal Stress,
Circumferential Stress, GHh , API RP 1102. GHh , API RP 1102.
From Table 2 - Highway Pavement Type Factors, R, and Axle From Table 2 - Highway Pavement Type Factors, R, and Axle
Configuration Factors, L , API RP 1102. Configuration Factors, L , API RP 1102.
So, the cyclic circumferential stress due to highway vehicular load : So, the cyclic longitudinal stress due to highway vehicular load :
S1 = 12,386.1 psi So, the cyclic longitudinal stress is less than the girth weld fatigue.
The design is ACCEPTABLE.
The maximum longitudinal stress, S2 :
G.2 Longitudinal Weld
S 2 =ΔS L−E s α T ( T 2 −T 1 ) +υ s ( S He + S Hi ) F = 0.4
Page 3 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
T1 = temperature at time of installation, °F = 80 DSHh = 2,497.60 psi
T2 = max. operating temperature, °F = 80
S2 = 5,327.92 psi Refer to Table 3 - Fatigue Endurance Limits, SFG and SFL , for Various
Steel Grades, API RP 1102 , for API 5L B material pipe :
The maximum radial stress, S3 : SFL = 21,000 psi (For Seamless or ERW pipe)
S 3 =− p=−MAOP or−MOP SFL x F = 8,400 psi
S3 = -725.18 psi For highway crossing, the girth weld fatigue check is given by the
following :
The total effective stress, Seff :
ΔS Hh≤S FL×F ® 2,497.60 £ 8,400.00 OK
S eff = √ 1
2
2 2
{( S1−S2 ) + ( S 2−S3 ) +( S 3 −S1 ) } 2
So, the cyclic circumferential stress is less than the longitudinal weld
fatigue.
Seff = 11,365.83 psi The design is ACCEPTABLE.
S eff £ SMYS F According to SNI 3474:2009 para , for location class 4, Effective Stress shall be less than or equal to 30% of
the pipe SMYS, so the design is
ACCEPTABLE.
Page 4 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
From Fig.4 - Burial Factor for Earth Load Circumferential Stress, Be , API
S = 14,000 psi RP 1102
SHi (Barlow) £ Allowable Stress ® OK Be = 0.800
C. Impact Factor, Fi, and Applied Design Surface Pressure, w Bd/ D = 1.00
H = 4.92 ft From Fig.5 - Excavation Factor for Earth Load Circumferential Stress,
Ee , API RP 1102
From Fig. 7 - Recommended Impact Factor Versus Depth, API
RP 1102 :
Ee = 0.83
Fi = 1.500
Applied design surface pressure, w :
So, the circumferential stress at the pipeline invert caused by earth load :
Critical case = Tandem Axles
Page 5 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
Pavement Type = Rigid Pavement
S He =K He Be Ee γ D
Design Wheel Load from Tandem Axles, Pt (kips) : 20
Applied Design Surface Pressure, w (psi) : 138.89 SHe = 1,105.58 psi
Page 6 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
D. Cyclic Stresses, DSHh and DSLh
D.1 Cyclic Circumferential Stress, DSHh D.2 Cyclic Longitudinal Stress, DSLh
From Fig. 14 - Highway Stiffness Factor for Cyclic Circumferential From Fig. 16 - Highway Stiffness Factor for Cyclic Longitudinal Stress, K Lh
Stress, KHh , API RP 1102. , API RP 1102.
tw/ D = 0.03202 tw/ D = 0.03202
Er = 5 ksi KHh = 12.50 Er = 5 ksi KLh = 12.50
From Fig. 15 - Highway Geometric Factor for Cyclic From Fig. 17 - Highway Geometric Factor for Cyclic Longitudinal Stress,
Circumferential Stress, GHh , API RP 1102. GHh , API RP 1102.
From Table 2 - Highway Pavement Type Factors, R, and Axle From Table 2 - Highway Pavement Type Factors, R, and Axle
Configuration Factors, L , API RP 1102. Configuration Factors, L , API RP 1102.
So, the cyclic circumferential stress due to highway vehicular load : So, the cyclic longitudinal stress due to highway vehicular load :
ΔS Hh=K Hh G Hh R L Fi w ΔS Lh=K Lh G Lh R L Fi w
DSHh = 3,939 psi DSLh = 3,437.50 psi
S1 = 16,005.8 psi So, the cyclic longitudinal stress is less than the girth weld fatigue.
The design is ACCEPTABLE.
The maximum longitudinal stress, S2 :
G.2 Longitudinal Weld
S 2 =ΔS L−E s α T ( T 2 −T 1 ) + υ s ( S He+ S Hi ) F = 0.4
Page 7 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
T1 = temperature at time of installation, °F = 80 DSHh = 3,938.80 psi
T2 = max. operating temperature, °F = 80
S2 = 7,057.60 psi Refer to Table 3 - Fatigue Endurance Limits, SFG and SFL , for Various
Steel Grades, API RP 1102 , for API 5L B material pipe :
The maximum radial stress, S3 : SFL = 21,000 psi (For Seamless or ERW pipe)
S 3 =− p=−MAOP or−MOP SFL x F = 8,400 psi
S3 = -725.18 psi For highway crossing, the girth weld fatigue check is given by the
following :
The total effective stress, Seff :
ΔS Hh≤S FL×F ® 3,938.80 £ 8,400.00 OK
S eff = √ 1
2
2 2
{( S1−S2 ) + ( S 2−S3 ) +( S 3 −S1 ) } 2
So, the cyclic circumferential stress is less than the longitudinal weld
fatigue.
Seff = 14,501.16 psi The design is ACCEPTABLE.
S eff £ SMYS F According to SNI 3474:2009 para , for location class 4, Effective Stress shall be less than or equal to 30% of
the pipe SMYS, so the design is
NOT ACCEPTABLE
Page 8 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
From Fig.4 - Burial Factor for Earth Load Circumferential Stress, Be , API
S = 14,000 psi RP 1102
SHi (Barlow) £ Allowable Stress ® OK Be = 1.320
C. Impact Factor, Fi, and Applied Design Surface Pressure, w Bd/ D = 1.00
H = 6.56 ft From Fig.5 - Excavation Factor for Earth Load Circumferential Stress,
Ee , API RP 1102
From Fig. 7 - Recommended Impact Factor Versus Depth, API
RP 1102 :
Ee = 0.83
Fi = 1.453
Applied design surface pressure, w :
So, the circumferential stress at the pipeline invert caused by earth load :
Critical case = Tandem Axles
Page 9 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
Pavement Type = Rigid Pavement
S He =K He Be Ee γ D
Design Wheel Load from Tandem Axles, Pt (kips) : 20
Applied Design Surface Pressure, w (psi) : 138.89 SHe = 170.16 psi
Page 10 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
D. Cyclic Stresses, DSHh and DSLh
D.1 Cyclic Circumferential Stress, DSHh D.2 Cyclic Longitudinal Stress, DSLh
From Fig. 14 - Highway Stiffness Factor for Cyclic Circumferential From Fig. 16 - Highway Stiffness Factor for Cyclic Longitudinal Stress, K Lh
Stress, KHh , API RP 1102. , API RP 1102.
tw/ D = 0.05267 tw/ D = 0.05267
Er = 5 ksi KHh = 7.50 Er = 5 ksi KLh = 7.50
From Fig. 15 - Highway Geometric Factor for Cyclic From Fig. 17 - Highway Geometric Factor for Cyclic Longitudinal Stress,
Circumferential Stress, GHh , API RP 1102. GHh , API RP 1102.
From Table 2 - Highway Pavement Type Factors, R, and Axle From Table 2 - Highway Pavement Type Factors, R, and Axle
Configuration Factors, L , API RP 1102. Configuration Factors, L , API RP 1102.
So, the cyclic circumferential stress due to highway vehicular load : So, the cyclic longitudinal stress due to highway vehicular load :
ΔS Hh=K Hh G Hh R L Fi w ΔS Lh=K Lh G Lh R L Fi w
DSHh = 1,873 psi DSLh = 2,315.96 psi
S1 = 8,565.4 psi So, the cyclic longitudinal stress is less than the girth weld fatigue.
The design is ACCEPTABLE.
The maximum longitudinal stress, S2 :
G.2 Longitudinal Weld
S 2 =ΔS L−E s α T ( T 2 −T 1 ) + υ s ( S He+ S Hi ) F = 0.4
Page 11 of 12
PIPELINE CROSSING CALCULATION
C
W
ROW W = Load Case, (lbs)
w
H = Depth, (ft)
D = Outside diameter, (in.)
Bd = Bored diameter, (in.)
Case : AASHTO HS 20-44
H
D Bd
DESIGN DATA
T1 = temperature at time of installation, °F = 80 DSHh = 1,873.20 psi
T2 = max. operating temperature, °F = 80
S2 = 4,323.61 psi Refer to Table 3 - Fatigue Endurance Limits, SFG and SFL , for Various
Steel Grades, API RP 1102 , for API 5L B material pipe :
The maximum radial stress, S3 : SFL = 21,000 psi (For Seamless or ERW pipe)
S 3 =− p=−MAOP or−MOP SFL x F = 8,400 psi
S3 = -725.18 psi For highway crossing, the girth weld fatigue check is given by the
following :
The total effective stress, Seff :
ΔS Hh≤S FL×F ® 1,873.20 £ 8,400.00 OK
S eff = √ 1
2
2 2
{( S1−S2 ) + ( S 2−S3 ) +( S 3 −S1 ) } 2
So, the cyclic circumferential stress is less than the longitudinal weld
fatigue.
Seff = 8,055.98 psi The design is ACCEPTABLE.
S eff £ SMYS F According to SNI 3474:2009 para , for location class 4, Effective Stress shall be less than or equal to 30% of
the pipe SMYS, so the design is
ACCEPTABLE.
Page 12 of 12