Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
EP 200 IG 2
CONTENTS
Pages
Main Form for Natural Persons and Sole Proprietorships ................................................. 56
2
EP 200 IG 2
Introduction
The Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants (ISCA) issued the new Ethics Pronouncement (EP)
200, Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism – Requirements and Guidelines
for Professional Accountants in Singapore, in October 2014. This pronouncement has also been adopted
by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) and is applicable to public accountants
and accounting entities registered under the Accountants Act who are regulated by ACRA.
The comprehensive requirements relating to anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of
terrorism (CFT) contained in the new pronouncement are benchmarked to international best practices
and the latest "International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism
& Proliferation” issued by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF Recommendations). The
pronouncement was developed by an ISCA Working Group comprising representatives from across the
public accounting sector and in consultation with the relevant regulators such as the Monetary Authority
of Singapore, ACRA and the Commercial Affairs Department of the Singapore Police Force.
With the objective of supporting the accountancy profession to implement the controls and procedures
required in EP 200, ISCA has developed EP 200 Implementation Guidance (IG) 2 – Illustrative Customer
Due Diligence (CDD) Templates to assist professional accountants and professional firms, specifically in
the area of customer due diligence.
The templates and questionnaires provided in EP 200 IG 2 are not prescriptive and should be tailored
and adapted for use, as appropriate for the professional firm’s purposes. Professional firms remain fully
responsible for ensuring compliance with AML and CFT requirements.
3
EP 200 IG 2
The flowcharts, templates and forms provided in EP 200 IG 2 are illustrations that firms providing the
services listed in paragraph 1.5 of EP 200 may refer to. As they relate to the services listed in paragraph
1.5 of EP 200, the CDD measures are more robust and may be referred to as a best practice guide for
professional firms engaged to perform other types of services. The templates and forms are not
prescriptive and should be tailored and adapted as needed in the professional firm’s professional
judgment. Information for internal office use are marked with the “○” symbol.
The following flowchart illustrates how the CDD process is carried out.
Yes
For each PEP, complete Form D (pages 15-
Is there one or more politically exposed 16)
person(s) involved?
No
Obtain senior management approval using
Not low risk the form on page 22 prior to completing the
Conduct risk assessment using the
form found on pages 17-21 Enhanced CDD form found on page 23
Normal
Verify the information obtained using the normal Verify the information obtained using the
CDD checklist. Upon successful verification, enhanced CDD checklist. Upon successful
proceed with client onboarding. verification, proceed with client onboarding.
4
EP 200 IG 2
MAIN FORM
(For natural persons
and sole
proprietorships)
Information collected in this form should be verified. Verification can be done subsequent to completing
risk assessment.
Identification
Question Response
Are you, or any party connected to you, a politically exposed person? Yes No
(Please complete
Form D for each
PEP)
What country is your business based in?
What type of products does your business sell or manufacture?
Please provide further details in the box below if necessary.
Any further details:
5
EP 200 IG 2
MAIN FORM
(For natural persons
and sole
proprietorships)
Client/Agent’s Declaration
I declare that the information provided in these forms is true and correct. I am aware that I may be subject
to prosecution and criminal sanctions under written law if I am found to have made any false statement
which I know to be false or which I do not believe to be true, or if I have intentionally suppressed any
material fact.
Name of client/agent:
Identity/passport number:
Date:
Signature:
Professional judgment must be exercised in determining if verification of identity should be that of “Normal
CDD” or “Enhanced CDD” standards, depending on the risk assessment performed on the client.
For Normal CDD, the following documents can be used to verify the client’s identity:
Copy of screening results from a reliable independent database (e.g., Thomson Reuters World-
☐
Check, Dow Jones Risk and Compliance database) of the client
Copy of passport or identification card (for Singaporeans and Singaporean Permanent Residents
☐
only)
A document containing the address of the individual (e.g., a bank statement or a recent utility bill) ☐
6
EP 200 IG 2
MAIN FORM
(For legal persons)
Identification
Other:
*delete where inapplicable
Registration Country of
number/incorporation incorporation or
number: registration:
Registered address:
Address of principal
place of business (if
different from above):
Intended nature and
purpose of the
business relationship:
Names of the directors
or partners:
Name of beneficial (Please complete Form A for each beneficial owner. Where a beneficial owner cannot be
owner(s): identified, please complete Form B instead.)
Name of person(s) (Please complete Form C for each person with executive authority.)
with executive
authority:
Question Response
Are you, or any party connected to you, a politically exposed person? Yes No
(Please complete
Form D for each
PEP)
What country is your business based in?
What type of products does your business sell or manufacture?
Please provide further details in the box below if necessary.
Any further details:
7
EP 200 IG 2
MAIN FORM
(For legal persons)
Client/Agent’s Declaration
I declare that the information provided in these forms is true and correct. I am aware that I may be subject
to prosecution and criminal sanctions under written law if I am found to have made any false statement
which I know to be false or which I do not believe to be true, or if I have intentionally suppressed any
material fact.
Name of client/agent:
Identity/passport number:
Date:
Signature:
Professional judgment must be exercised in determining if verification of identity should be that of “Normal
CDD” or “Enhanced CDD” standards, depending on the risk assessment performed on the client.
For Normal CDD, the following documents can be used to verify the client’s identity:
Copy of screening results from a reliable independent database (e.g., Thomson Reuters World-
☐
Check, Dow Jones Risk and Compliance database) of the client
ACRA profile of the company or incorporation or registration documents from a regulatory body (for
☐
foreign firms) or certificate of incorporation (for foreign firms)
Information documenting the ownership and control structure of the entity (e.g., ownership chart
☐
signed by a director.)
8
EP 200 IG 2
FORM A
(Identification and
verification of
beneficial owners)
Form A: Beneficial Owners
For each beneficial owner that the client has, please complete the following form. Certain clients do not
need to fill up this form. Please refer to Annex 1 for a list of these clients.
If an ACRA search profile of the shareholders have been obtained, it is not necessary to verify the identity
of the shareholders/partners further. A shareholder may be a beneficial owner if the shareholder
ultimately owns or controls more than 25% of shares in the company.
Identification
BENEFICIAL OWNER
*If the beneficial owner is a PEP, Form D must be completed in addition to this form.
Client/Agent’s Declaration
I declare that the information provided in these forms is true and correct. I am aware that I may be subject
to prosecution and criminal sanctions under written law if I am found to have made any false statement
which I know to be false or which I do not believe to be true, or if I have intentionally suppressed any
material fact.
Name of client/agent:
Identity/passport number:
Date:
Signature:
9
EP 200 IG 2
FORM A
(Identification and
verification of
beneficial owners)
○ Verification (for office use)
Verification of the identity of beneficial owners is to be done on the basis of risk. Reasonable measures
should be taken to verify the identity of the beneficial owners. For example, the following documents can
be collected:
Copy of screening results from a reliable independent database (e.g., Thomson Reuters World-
☐
Check, Dow Jones Risk and Compliance database) of the beneficial owner
Copy of passport or identification card (for Singaporeans and Singaporean Permanent Residents
☐
only)
10
EP 200 IG 2
FORM B
(For senior
managing officials)
Form B: Senior Managing Officials
In the event that no natural persons are identified as the beneficial owners, this form should be completed
to identify and verify the identity of the relevant natural person(s) holding the position of senior managing
official(s).
Identification
*If the senior managing offical is a PEP, Form D must be completed in addition to this form.
Client/Agent’s Declaration
I declare that the information provided in these forms is true and correct. I am aware that I may be subject
to prosecution and criminal sanctions under written law if I am found to have made any false statement
which I know to be false or which I do not believe to be true, or if I have intentionally suppressed any
material fact.
Name of client/agent:
Identity/passport number:
Date:
Signature:
11
EP 200 IG 2
FORM B
(Senior managing
officials)
Copy of screening results from a reliable independent database (e.g., Thomson Reuters World- ☐
Check, Dow Jones Risk and Compliance database) of the senior managing official
Copy of passport or identification card (for Singaporeans and Singaporean Permanent Residents ☐
only)
12
EP 200 IG 2
FORM C
(Agents)
Where a person purports to act on behalf of a client, the professional firm shall identify and verify the
identity of the person and shall verify that the person is so authorised by completing this form.
Identification
*If the agent is a PEP, Form D must be completed in addition to this form.
13
EP 200 IG 2
FORM C
(Agents)
Client/Agent’s Declaration
I declare that the information provided in these forms is true and correct. I am aware that I may be subject
to prosecution and criminal sanctions under written law if I am found to have made any false statement
which I know to be false or which I do not believe to be true, or if I have intentionally suppressed any
material fact.
Name of client/agent:
Identity/passport number:
Date:
Signature:
14
EP 200 IG 2
FORM D
(PEP)
Where there is one or more PEPs involved, this form must be completed. Please use a separate form for
each PEP.
Identification
Name of PEP:
Nature of prominent
public function that the
PEP is or has been
entrusted with1:
Name of public
function:
Country:
Period of service:
PEP relationship with Self
the client: Family member (Spouse / Child / Parent / Child’s Spouse*)
Close associate
Ultimate beneficial owner / shareholder / director / partner / authorized
person* of client
Others (please specify):
*delete where inapplicable
Source(s) of wealth: Approximate Amount (SGD)
1
For example, as a domestic politically exposed person, a foreign politically exposed person, or a politically exposed person of an
international organisation.
15
EP 200 IG 2
FORM D
(PEP)
Client/Agent’s Declaration
I declare that the information provided in these forms is true and correct. I am aware that I may be subject
to prosecution and criminal sanctions under written law if I am found to have made any false statement
which I know to be false or which I do not believe to be true, or if I have intentionally suppressed any
material fact.
Name of client/agent:
Identity/passport number:
Date:
Signature:
2
Examples of independent verification measures include citing public information sources (e.g. company websites, corporate
registration websites, journals and media reports) to verify net worth as well as obtaining documentary evidence, such as bank
statements, confirmation from third party professionals (e.g. tax advisors), and financial statements or management accounts of
operating companies. Professional firms should also assess the authenticity and reliability of the documents provided by the
clients. More evidentiary verification options are typically required for higher-risk clients. Aside from the common verification
measures such as citing public information sources, some institutions commission independent investigations to perform
background checks on higher-risk PEPs, obtain financial statements of the business(es) where the source of wealth/funds is
derived, and perform site visits.
16
EP 200 IG 2
For existing clients only (leave this field blank if not applicable): Response
Routine review of existing client Yes No
Review as a result of a trigger event – Please indicate the trigger event: Yes No
For new clients only (leave this field blank if not applicable): Response
Referred client – Please indicate source of referral below: Yes No
3
Please provide details regarding the nature of services required by client :
Establishing or continuing business relationship with the client is NOT allowed if the answer to
any of the questions below is "NO."
Question Response
For new client, up-to-date and relevant client identification information, Yes No N/A
including information on shareholders and directors, has been obtained
as per Page 1.
For existing client, no doubt arises as to the veracity or adequacy of the Yes No N/A
evidence previously obtained for the purposes of client identification;
otherwise, client identification information has been re-verified.
4
Client and connected parties DO NOT MATCH with terrorist suspects Yes No
and/or special interest entities in reliable, independent screening
databases5.
Client and connected parties DO NOT MATCH with any of the names Yes No
under the list of names under the applicable Schedules of the Terrorism
(Suppression of Financing) Act (Cap. 325) and United Nations
sanctioned entities.
If the answer to any of the following questions is "Yes”, the business relationship must be either
terminated or declined. If the answer is “No”, the risk level is “Normal” and you may proceed to
the risk assessment questionnaire.
Question Response
The ownership of the client is unable to be verified (i.e. comparing Yes No
information based on documents).
3
Certain services are subject to additional requirements under the Ethics Pronouncement 200 and CSP Guidelines. Pl ease see
Annex 2 for a list of these services.
4
Connected parties may be family members or close associates (e.g. individuals closely connected either socially or profession ally).
5
Possible databases you may use are Accuity Compliance, Thomson Reuters W orld-Check, Dow Jones Risk & Compliance
Database and Truth Technologies’ Sentinel.
17
EP 200 IG 2
Question Response
6
Client or beneficial owners or directors is a Politically Exposed Person Yes No
(PEP).
Client or beneficial owner or directors is matched with a person in the MAS Yes No
control list.
The issues are related to predicate crimes for money laundering and/or fraud Yes No
and/or crime (including suspected cases).
Client or beneficial owner or connected party has adverse news based on Yes No
searches from Factiva and/or Google.
The issues are related to predicate crimes for money laundering and/or fraud Yes No
and/or crime (including suspected cases).
Question Response
Client or beneficial owner or beneficiary is connected to high risk Yes No
jurisdictions8 in any of the above listed aspects.
Client or beneficial owner or beneficiary is connected to a jurisdiction not in a Yes No
9
low risk country .
6
A beneficial owner refers to the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a client and/or the natural person on whose behalf
a transaction is being conducted. It also includes those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over a legal person or
arrangement.
7
As determined by the firm, such as with reference to publications and guidance issued from time to time by the FATF.
8
Refer to the FATF list of high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions to determine which countries are high-risk jurisdictions:
http://www.fatf-gafi.org/topics/high-riskandnon-cooperativejurisdictions/
9
Determining whether a country is low-risk should be based on the firm’s internal policy and your professional judgment. Reference
should be made to the FATF list of high-risk countries as well.
18
EP 200 IG 2
Question Response
Client relationship is established through a non-face-to-face approach. Yes No
Client relationship is established through online, postal or telephone, where Yes No
non face to face approach is used.
Client relationship is not established through referral. Yes No
(where applicable) Higher Low6
Client relationship is established through referral by a member firm in a risk/not in a
jurisdiction that is: ________________________________. low risk
country
The member firm does not have equivalent AML/CFT measures that are able Yes No
to mitigate the risks of being from a higher risk country.
*CDD documents must be obtained from the member firm
“Yes” to any of the questions in Sections 1, 2 and 3 serves as an indicator of higher risk. Where there is
one or more “yes” responses, professional judgment, with reference to the policies and procedures of the
professional firm, must be exercised as to the nature of the Customer Due Diligence to be carried out.
Please discuss any risk factor with the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO).
The following is only where the client is, or is associated with, a PEP.
19
EP 200 IG 2
The following risk evaluation is to assist in determining what level of ongoing monitoring and CDD should
be conducted.
Instructions
1. Obtain an initial risk rating, being the highest risk indicator in Section 1.
2. Provide justifications in Section 2 to adjust the initial risk rating in Section 1, if considered justifiable,
subject to the following conditions:
High risk rating should NOT be reduced if Client is attached to any of the following risk factors:
Section 1 : PEP, Section 2 : High-Risk Jurisdictions
Justifications must also be provided for adjustment from High-Risk to Low-Risk in Section 3
Section 3 : Justifications
Section 4 is to be signed off by the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) if it differs from
Section 1.
The final risk rating may be used as a guide to the level of ongoing monitoring that the client should be
subject to. This only serves as a guide and professional judgment should still be exercised in deciding on
the appropriate level of ongoing monitoring and CDD processes.
20
EP 200 IG 2
Section 5: Recommendation
“Terminate” action should be discussed with the MLRO to decide appropriate further action.
Assessed by:
Approved by:
21
EP 200 IG 2
Engagement Information
Description of
engagement:
Engagement
team members:
Client Information
Client name:
Registration
number:
Country of
incorporation:
Date of
incorporation:
Address:
Contact number:
I approve the above engagement. The team may proceed with the engagement provided that enhanced
CDD is successfully conducted.
22
EP 200 IG 2
MAIN FORM
(For higher-risk
clients only)
Background and
purpose of any
transaction(s) that the
firm has been engaged
to carry out:
Any other additional
information:
23
EP 200 IG 2
Annex 1
Unless the professional firm has doubts about the veracity of the CDD information obtained or suspects
that the client, business relations with, or transaction for the client may be connected with money
laundering or terrorist financing activities, it is not necessary for the professional firm to identify and verify
the identity of any shareholder or beneficial owner of a client if the client is:.
10
(a) A Singapore Government entity ;
11
(b) A foreign government entity ;
(d) An entity listed on a stock exchange outside of Singapore that is subject to regulatory disclosure
requirements (e.g., the foreign stock exchanges of FATF member countries);
(f) A financial institution that is licensed, approved, registered (including a fund management company
registered under paragraph 5(1)(i) of the Second Schedule to the Securities and Futures (Licensing
and Conduct of Business) Regulations (Rg. 10)) or regulated by the MAS but does not include:
(i) Holders of stored value facilities, as defined in section 2(1) of the Payment Systems
(Oversight) Act (Cap. 222A); and
(ii) A person (other than a person referred to in (g) and (h)) who is exempted from licensing,
approval or regulation by the MAS under any Act administered by the MAS, including a
private trust company exempted from licensing under section 15 of the Trust Companies Act
(Cap. 336) read with regulation 4 of the Trust Companies (Exemption) Regulations (Rg. 1);
(g) A person exempted under section 23(1)(f) of the Financial Advisers Act (Cap. 110) read with
regulation 27(1)(d) of the Financial Advisers Regulation (Rg. 2);
(h) A person exempted under section 99(1)(h) of the Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) read with
paragraph 7(1)(b) of the Second Schedule to the Securities and Futures (Licensing and Conduct of
Business) Regulations;
(i) A financial institution incorporated or established outside Singapore that is subject to and
supervised for compliance with AML/CFT requirements consistent with standards set by the FATF;
or
(ii) incorporated or established outside Singapore but are subject to and supervised for
compliance with AML/CFT requirements consistent with standards set by the FATF,
10
Singapore Government entities include the Singapore Government, the Ministries, statutory boards, organs of state and other
organisations as set out in the Singapore Government Directory.
11
A foreign government entity means a government of a foreign country or jurisdiction, a ministry within such a government, or an
agency specially established by such a government through written law.
24
EP 200 IG 2
Annex 2
The following services must comply with Section 4 of the Ethics Pronouncement 200:
Corporate service providers are required to comply with Part II of the First Schedule of the Accounting
and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Filing Agents and Qualified Individuals) Regulations 2015, entitled
“Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Measures”. Entities providing these services fall
under corporate service providers:
25