Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Conclusion - mpssb - online suggestion

HYPOTHESIS

The absence of a clear law regarding the implementation of Biodiversity law is propelling a
tug of war between users of biological resources and regulatory bodies which led to the
misuse of provision of Biodiversity act.

Objective of this study

To examine the hypothesis in the light of the answers to the research question arrived at.

Research Questions

1. How is the implementation of biodiversity act by Madhya Pradesh State biodiversity


Board is effecting the farmers of remote areas of Madhya pradesh ?
2. How does the formation of Biodiversity Management Committee have helped the
officials to implement the act in a coherent and practical manner ?
3. How does the constitutionality validity of the the Act have impact on general people at
large ?

4. How is the is the absence of provisions to deal with the criminal procedures for search,
seizure or arrest could be solved ?

Abstract

The Parliament of India enacted the Biological Diversity (BD) Act in 2002. With that
the country got a formal legal regime for the conservation of, access to and
sustainable use of both biological resources (hereinafter referred to as bioresources),
as well as people’s knowledge associated with their local biological heritage.Many
policies, Acts, and Rules are usually formulated at international and national level to
safeguard the biodiversity with good objectives. The formulation of such guiding
priniciples takes consideration of realised problems and concerns of saving a
valuable resource such as biodiversity.At the international level Convention of
Biological Diversity (CBD) – a legally binding treaty was adopted at Rio De Janeiro
in June 1992 to protect the biological diversity of the signing parties at their own
levels.Though the idea behind formulation of Biological Diversity Act seemed very
noble, it is often observed that partial experiences are taken into consideration while
formulation of such laws. This is thus inadequate when implemented in the field. A
critical analysis of this Biodiversity Act 2002 should be made therefore. Actual
benefits derived in the field needs to be gauged and hence the actual realisation needs
to be documented while considering the benefits of the Act.

Statement of problem

The objective of this paper is to seek the desired implementation of Biodiversity Act,
2000, however, due to its lack of pragmatic approach and rigid enforcement
mechanism, the said target of proper implementation have been diluted. A need is,
therefore, persist that despite of statutory provision of implementation, the
government still has not been able to perform for general interest of community for
conversing biological resource and biodiversity.

Вам также может понравиться