Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error

age Mean 43.68 .767

Lampiran Data SPSS 95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 42.17
Mean Upper Bound 45.19
1. Analisa Univariat
5% Trimmed Mean 43.56

Median Case Processing Summary 44.00

Variance Cases 159.308

Valid
Std. Deviation Missing 12.622 Total
N
Minimum Percent N Percent N18 Percent

age 271
Maximum 100.0% 0 0.0% 271
84 100.0%
physical fitness 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%
Range 66
how many alcoholic drinks
Interquartile
271 Range
100.0% 0 0.0% 20
271 100.0%
per day
Skewness .081 .148
Statistics how many caffeine drinks
per day Kurtosis271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271
-.603 100.0%
.295
sex
physical fitness
HADS Depression Mean 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 6.37
271 .096
100.0%
N Valid 271
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 6.18
Missing 0
Mean Upper Bound 6.56
Mean .45
5% Trimmed Mean 6.42
Median .00
Skewness .216 Median 7.00

Std. Error of Skewness .148 Variance 2.524

Kurtosis -1.968 Std. Deviation 1.589

Std. Error of Kurtosis .295 Minimum 2
Maximum 9
Range 7
Interquartile Range 3
sex
Skewness -.421 .148
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Kurtosis -.369 .295
Percent
how many alcoholic drinks Mean 1.04 .084
Valid female 150 55.4 55.4 55.4
per day 95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound .87
Mean Upper Bound 1.20
5% Trimmed Mean .87
Median 1.00
Variance 1.920
 male 121 44.6 44.6 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

Statistics
age

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 43.68
Median 44.00
Std. Deviation 12.622
Skewness .081
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis -.603
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Minimum 18
Maximum 84

Frequencies

Statistics
marital status

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 1.94
Median 2.00
Skewness .774
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis 2.214
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295

marital status

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid single 54 19.9 19.9 19.9

married/defacto 188 69.4 69.4 89.3

divorced 21 7.7 7.7 97.0

widowed 8 3.0 3.0 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

Statistics
highest education level achieved

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 4.10
Median 4.00
Skewness -.974
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis -.207
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
 highest education level achieved

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid primary school 3 1.1 1.1 1.1

secondary school 33 12.2 12.2 13.3

trade training/ post secondary

31 11.4 11.4 24.7
training

undergraduate degree 72 26.6 26.6 51.3

postgraduate degree 132 48.7 48.7 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

Statistics
HADS Depression

N Valid 269

Missing 2
Mean 3.50
Median 3.00
Std. Deviation 2.993
Skewness .952
Std. Error of Skewness .149
Kurtosis .108
Std. Error of Kurtosis .296
Minimum 0
Maximum 12

HADS Depression

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 0 34 12.5 12.6 12.6

1 50 18.5 18.6 31.2

2 41 15.1 15.2 46.5

3 40 14.8 14.9 61.3

4 23 8.5 8.6 69.9

5 20 7.4 7.4 77.3

6 14 5.2 5.2 82.5

7 15 5.5 5.6 88.1

8 8 3.0 3.0 91.1

9 7 2.6 2.6 93.7

10 7 2.6 2.6 96.3

11 9 3.3 3.3 99.6

12 1 .4 .4 100.0

Total 269 99.3 100.0

Missing System 2 .7
Total 271 100.0
 Statistics
HADS Depression

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 3.48
Median 3.00
Std. Deviation 2.991
Skewness .959
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis .124
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Minimum 0
Maximum 12

HADS Depression

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 0 35 12.9 12.9 12.9

1 50 18.5 18.5 31.4

2 42 15.5 15.5 46.9

3 40 14.8 14.8 61.6

4 23 8.5 8.5 70.1

5 20 7.4 7.4 77.5

 6 14 5.2 5.2 82.7

7 15 5.5 5.5 88.2

8 8 3.0 3.0 91.1

9 7 2.6 2.6 93.7

10 7 2.6 2.6 96.3

11 9 3.3 3.3 99.6

12 1 .4 .4 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

Statistics
qual sleep rec

N Valid 268

Missing 3
Mean 2.70
Median 3.00
Skewness -.210
Std. Error of Skewness .149
Kurtosis -1.003
Std. Error of Kurtosis .297

qual sleep rec

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid very poor, poor 36 13.3 13.4 13.4

fair 75 27.7 28.0 41.4

good 90 33.2 33.6 75.0

 very good, excellent 67 24.7 25.0 100.0

Total 268 98.9 100.0

Missing System 3 1.1
Total 271 100.0

Statistics
qual sleep rec

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 2.71
Median 3.00
Skewness -.222
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis -.991
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295

qual sleep rec

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid very poor, poor 36 13.3 13.3 13.3

fair 75 27.7 27.7 41.0

good 92 33.9 33.9 74.9

very good, excellent 68 25.1 25.1 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

 Statistics
physical fitness

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 6.37
Median 7.00
Std. Deviation 1.589
Skewness -.421
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis -.369
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Minimum 2
Maximum 9

physical fitness

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 2 3 1.1 1.1 1.1

3 9 3.3 3.3 4.4

4 25 9.2 9.2 13.7

5 41 15.1 15.1 28.8

6 52 19.2 19.2 48.0

 7 70 25.8 25.8 73.8

8 52 19.2 19.2 93.0

9 19 7.0 7.0 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

Statistics
do you smoke

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 1.87
Median 2.00
Skewness -2.274
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis 3.195
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295

do you smoke

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid yes 34 12.5 12.5 12.5

no 237 87.5 87.5 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

 Statistics
how many alcoholic drinks per day

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 1.04
Median 1.00
Std. Deviation 1.385
Skewness 3.416
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis 20.290
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Minimum 0
Maximum 12

how many alcoholic drinks per day

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 0 109 40.2 40.2 40.2

0 2 .7 .7 41.0

1 7 2.6 2.6 43.5

 1 80 29.5 29.5 73.1

2 3 1.1 1.1 74.2

2 46 17.0 17.0 91.1

3 15 5.5 5.5 96.7

4 2 .7 .7 97.4

5 5 1.8 1.8 99.3

10 1 .4 .4 99.6

12 1 .4 .4 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

Statistics
how many caffeine drinks per day

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 2.94
Median 3.00
Std. Deviation 1.916
Skewness .649
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis .554
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Minimum 0
Maximum 10
 how many caffeine drinks per day

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 0 28 10.3 10.3 10.3

1 31 11.4 11.4 21.8

2 1 .4 .4 22.1

2 57 21.0 21.0 43.2

3 1 .4 .4 43.5

3 62 22.9 22.9 66.4

4 40 14.8 14.8 81.2

5 25 9.2 9.2 90.4

6 14 5.2 5.2 95.6

7 5 1.8 1.8 97.4

8 5 1.8 1.8 99.3

9 1 .4 .4 99.6

10 1 .4 .4 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

 Statistics
age

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 43.68
Median 44.00
Std. Deviation 12.622
Variance 159.308
Skewness .081
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis -.603
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Minimum 18
Maximum 84
Percentiles 25 34.00

50 44.00

75 54.00
 Statistics
age

N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 43.68
Std. Error of Mean .767
Median 44.00
Std. Deviation 12.622
Variance 159.308
Skewness .081
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis -.603
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Range 66
Minimum 18
Maximum 84
Percentiles 25 34.00

50 44.00

75 54.00

Case Processing Summary

 Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

age 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%

Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error

age Mean 43.68 .767

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 42.17

Mean Upper Bound 45.19

5% Trimmed Mean 43.56

Median 44.00

Variance 159.308

Std. Deviation 12.622

Minimum 18

Maximum 84

Range 66

Interquartile Range 20

Skewness .081 .148

Kurtosis -.603 .295

Case Processing Summary

Cases
 Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

age 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%

physical fitness 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%
how many alcoholic drinks per
271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%
day
how many caffeine drinks per
271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%
day
HADS Depression 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%

Descriptive Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

age 43.68 12.622 271

HADS Depression 3.48 2.991 271

Correlations

age HADS Depression

age Pearson Correlation 1 -.020

Sig. (2-tailed) .740

Sum of Squares and Cross-

43013.070 -206.266
products

Covariance 159.308 -.764

N 271 271
HADS Depression Pearson Correlation -.020 1
 Sig. (2-tailed) .740

Sum of Squares and Cross-

-206.266 2415.638
products

Covariance -.764 8.947

N 271 271

Descriptives
HADS Depression

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

female 150 3.65 3.014 .246 3.17 4.14 0 12

male 121 3.26 2.960 .269 2.73 3.80 0 11
Total 271 3.48 2.991 .182 3.12 3.84 0 12

ANOVA
HADS Depression

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 10.128 1 10.128 1.133 .288

Within Groups 2405.511 269 8.942
Total 2415.638 270
 Descriptives
HADS Depression

Std. Std. 95% Confidence Interval

N Mean Deviation Error for Mean Minimum Maximum

Lower Upper
Bound Bound

single 54 3.50 3.070 .418 2.66 4.34 0 11

married/
188 3.57 3.019 .220 3.14 4.01 0 12
defacto
divorced 21 3.00 2.775 .606 1.74 4.26 0 8
widowed 8 2.38 2.446 .865 .33 4.42 0 7
Total 271 3.48 2.991 .182 3.12 3.84 0 12

ANOVA
HADS Depression

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 16.306 3 5.435 .605 .612

Within Groups 2399.332 267 8.986
Total 2415.638 270

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: HADS Depression
Bonferroni

Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval

(I) marital status (J) marital status (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

single married/defacto -.074 .463 1.000 -1.30 1.16

divorced .500 .771 1.000 -1.55 2.55

widowed 1.125 1.136 1.000 -1.89 4.14

married/defacto single .074 .463 1.000 -1.16 1.30
divorced .574 .690 1.000 -1.26 2.41
widowed 1.199 1.082 1.000 -1.68 4.08
divorced single -.500 .771 1.000 -2.55 1.55
married/defacto -.574 .690 1.000 -2.41 1.26
widowed .625 1.245 1.000 -2.69 3.94
widowed single -1.125 1.136 1.000 -4.14 1.89

married/defacto -1.199 1.082 1.000 -4.08 1.68

divorced -.625 1.245 1.000 -3.94 2.69

Descriptives
HADS Depression

95% Confidence

Std. Interval for Mean

Deviati Std. Lower Upper

N Mean on Error Bound Bound Minimum Maximum

primary school 3 1.67 1.155 .667 -1.20 4.54 1 3

secondary
33 3.12 2.547 .443 2.22 4.02 0 10
school
trade training/
post secondary 31 4.58 3.264 .586 3.38 5.78 0 11
training
undergraduate
72 3.69 2.949 .347 3.00 4.39 0 11
degree
postgraduate
132 3.23 3.034 .264 2.71 3.76 0 12
degree
Total 271 3.48 2.991 .182 3.12 3.84 0 12

ANOVA
HADS Depression

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 62.911 4 15.728 1.778 .134

Within Groups 2352.728 266 8.845
Total 2415.638 270

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: HADS Depression
Bonferroni

(I) highest education level (J) highest education level Mean 95% Confidence Interval

achieved achieved Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
primary school secondary school -1.455 1.793 1.000 -6.53 3.62

trade training/ post

-2.914 1.798 1.000 -8.00 2.18
secondary training

undergraduate degree -2.028 1.752 1.000 -6.99 2.93

postgraduate degree -1.568 1.736 1.000 -6.48 3.35

secondary school primary school 1.455 1.793 1.000 -3.62 6.53
trade training/ post
-1.459 .744 .508 -3.57 .65
secondary training
undergraduate degree -.573 .625 1.000 -2.34 1.20
postgraduate degree -.114 .579 1.000 -1.75 1.52
trade training/ post primary school 2.914 1.798 1.000 -2.18 8.00
secondary training secondary school 1.459 .744 .508 -.65 3.57
undergraduate degree .886 .639 1.000 -.92 2.69
postgraduate degree 1.346 .594 .242 -.33 3.03
undergraduate degree primary school 2.028 1.752 1.000 -2.93 6.99
secondary school .573 .625 1.000 -1.20 2.34
trade training/ post
-.886 .639 1.000 -2.69 .92
secondary training
postgraduate degree .460 .436 1.000 -.77 1.69
postgraduate degree primary school 1.568 1.736 1.000 -3.35 6.48

secondary school .114 .579 1.000 -1.52 1.75

trade training/ post

-1.346 .594 .242 -3.03 .33
secondary training

undergraduate degree -.460 .436 1.000 -1.69 .77

 Descriptives
HADS Depression

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

yes 34 3.41 2.808 .482 2.43 4.39 0 12

no 237 3.49 3.022 .196 3.10 3.88 0 11
Total 271 3.48 2.991 .182 3.12 3.84 0 12

ANOVA
HADS Depression

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups .179 1 .179 .020 .888

Within Groups 2415.459 269 8.979
Total 2415.638 270

Descriptives
HADS Depression

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

very poor 11 5.18 3.311 .998 2.96 7.41 1 11

poor 25 5.04 3.953 .791 3.41 6.67 0 12
fair 75 4.17 2.811 .325 3.53 4.82 0 11
good 90 3.12 2.702 .285 2.56 3.69 0 11
very good 57 2.23 2.471 .327 1.57 2.88 0 11
excellent 10 2.40 2.366 .748 .71 4.09 0 7
Total 268 3.46 2.968 .181 3.11 3.82 0 12

ANOVA
HADS Depression

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 241.193 5 48.239 5.986 .000

Within Groups 2111.434 262 8.059
Total 2352.627 267

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: HADS Depression
Bonferroni

Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval

(I) quality of sleep (J) quality of sleep (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

very poor poor .142 1.027 1.000 -2.90 3.18

fair 1.008 .917 1.000 -1.71 3.72

good 2.060 .907 .359 -.63 4.75

*
very good 2.954 .935 .026 .18 5.72

excellent 2.782 1.240 .386 -.89 6.46

poor very poor -.142 1.027 1.000 -3.18 2.90
fair .867 .656 1.000 -1.08 2.81
good 1.918* .642 .046 .02 3.82
 very good 2.812* .681 .001 .79 4.83
excellent 2.640 1.062 .203 -.51 5.79
fair very poor -1.008 .917 1.000 -3.72 1.71
poor -.867 .656 1.000 -2.81 1.08
good 1.051 .444 .279 -.26 2.37
very good 1.945* .499 .002 .47 3.42
excellent 1.773 .956 .970 -1.06 4.60
good very poor -2.060 .907 .359 -4.75 .63
*
poor -1.918 .642 .046 -3.82 -.02
fair -1.051 .444 .279 -2.37 .26
very good .894 .481 .959 -.53 2.32
excellent .722 .946 1.000 -2.08 3.53
*
very good very poor -2.954 .935 .026 -5.72 -.18
poor -2.812* .681 .001 -4.83 -.79
*
fair -1.945 .499 .002 -3.42 -.47
good -.894 .481 .959 -2.32 .53
excellent -.172 .973 1.000 -3.06 2.71
excellent very poor -2.782 1.240 .386 -6.46 .89

poor -2.640 1.062 .203 -5.79 .51

fair -1.773 .956 .970 -4.60 1.06

good -.722 .946 1.000 -3.53 2.08

very good .172 .973 1.000 -2.71 3.06

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Statistics
quality of sleep
N Valid 271

Missing 0
Mean 3.69
Std. Error of Mean .069
Median 4.00
Std. Deviation 1.138
Variance 1.296
Skewness -.279
Std. Error of Skewness .148
Kurtosis -.196
Std. Error of Kurtosis .295
Range 5
Minimum 1
Maximum 6
Percentiles 25 3.00

50 4.00

75 4.00

quality of sleep

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid very poor 11 4.1 4.1 4.1

poor 26 9.6 9.6 13.7

fair 76 28.0 28.0 41.7

good 91 33.6 33.6 75.3

 very good 57 21.0 21.0 96.3

excellent 10 3.7 3.7 100.0

Total 271 100.0 100.0

2. Analisa Bivariat Quality Sleep

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Umur Kategorik * quality of

271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%
sleep

Umur Kategorik * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very very excelle

poor poor fair good good nt Total

Umur usia dewasa muda Count 4 11 26 55 32 5 133

Kategorik (<44 tahun) % within Umur
3.0% 8.3% 19.5% 41.4% 24.1% 3.8% 100.0%
Kategorik

Count 7 15 50 36 25 5 138
 usia dewasa akhir % within Umur
5.1% 10.9% 36.2% 26.1% 18.1% 3.6% 100.0%
(>=44tahun) Kategorik
Total Count 11 26 76 91 57 10 271

% within Umur
4.1% 9.6% 28.0% 33.6% 21.0% 3.7% 100.0%
Kategorik

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 13.752a 5 .017

Likelihood Ratio 13.923 5 .016
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.145 1 .013
N of Valid Cases 271

a. 1 cells (8.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 4.91.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for Umur Kategorik
(usia dewasa muda (<44 tahun) a

/ usia dewasa akhir

(>=44tahun))

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

latihan fisik kategori * quality of

201 74.2% 70 25.8% 271 100.0%
sleep

latihan fisik kategori * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very very excelle

poor poor fair good good nt Total

latihan fisik Malas Count 6 17 39 41 22 5 130

kategori (<7xperminggu) % within latihan fisik
4.6% 13.1% 30.0% 31.5% 16.9% 3.8% 100.0%
kategori

Count 2 5 16 24 22 2 71
 Rajin % within latihan fisik
2.8% 7.0% 22.5% 33.8% 31.0% 2.8% 100.0%
(>=7xperminggu) kategori
Total Count 8 22 55 65 44 7 201

% within latihan fisik

4.0% 10.9% 27.4% 32.3% 21.9% 3.5% 100.0%
kategori

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.197a 5 .206

Likelihood Ratio 7.180 5 .208
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.710 1 .030
N of Valid Cases 201

a. 3 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.47.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for latihan fisik

a
kategori (Malas (<7xperminggu)
/ Rajin (>=7xperminggu))

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.
 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Alkohol Kategorik * quality of

268 98.9% 3 1.1% 271 100.0%
sleep

Alkohol Kategorik * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very very excelle

poor poor fair good good nt Total

Alkohol <=1 (peminum Count 7 16 52 67 47 9 198

Kategorik ringan) % within Alkohol
3.5% 8.1% 26.3% 33.8% 23.7% 4.5% 100.0%
Kategorik

>1 (peminum Count 4 9 24 22 10 1 70

berat) % within Alkohol
5.7% 12.9% 34.3% 31.4% 14.3% 1.4% 100.0%
Kategorik
Total Count 11 25 76 89 57 10 268

% within Alkohol
4.1% 9.3% 28.4% 33.2% 21.3% 3.7% 100.0%
Kategorik
 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 6.646 5 .248
Likelihood Ratio 6.952 5 .224
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.304 1 .012
N of Valid Cases 268

a. 2 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.61.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for Alkohol

a
Kategorik (<=1 (peminum
ringan) / >1 (peminum berat))

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

 N Percent N Percent N Percent

Kafein Kategorik * quality of

270 99.6% 1 0.4% 271 100.0%
sleep

Kafein Kategorik * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very very excelle

poor poor fair good good nt Total

Kafein <2 (peminum kopi Count 2 12 31 41 27 4 117

Kategorik ringan % within Kafein
1.7% 10.3% 26.5% 35.0% 23.1% 3.4% 100.0%
Kategorik

=>2 (peminum kopi Count 9 14 45 50 29 6 153

berat) % within Kafein
5.9% 9.2% 29.4% 32.7% 19.0% 3.9% 100.0%
Kategorik
Total Count 11 26 76 91 56 10 270

% within Kafein
4.1% 9.6% 28.1% 33.7% 20.7% 3.7% 100.0%
Kategorik

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.817a 5 .576

Likelihood Ratio 4.117 5 .533
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.367 1 .242
 N of Valid Cases 270

a. 2 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 4.33.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for Kafein Kategorik

a
(<2 (peminum kopi ringan / =>2
(peminum kopi berat))

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

sex * quality of sleep 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%

sex * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very poor poor fair good very good excellent Total

sex female Count 8 11 43 57 26 5 150
Chi-Square Tests
% within sex 5.3% 7.3% 28.7% 38.0% 17.3% 3.3% 100.0%

male Count 3 15 33 34 31 5 121

% within sex 2.5% 12.4% 27.3% 28.1% 25.6% 4.1% 100.0%

Total Count 11 26 76 91 57 10 271

% within sex 4.1% 9.6% 28.0% 33.6% 21.0% 3.7% 100.0%

 Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 7.438 5 .190
Likelihood Ratio 7.502 5 .186
Linear-by-Linear Association .488 1 .485
N of Valid Cases 271

a. 2 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 4.46.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for sex (female / a

male)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

marital status * quality of sleep 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%

 marital status * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very very
poor poor fair good good excellent Total

marital single Count 1 4 13 21 14 1 54

status % within marital
1.9% 7.4% 24.1% 38.9% 25.9% 1.9% 100.0%
status

married/defact Count 8 20 53 60 39 8 188

o % within marital
4.3% 10.6% 28.2% 31.9% 20.7% 4.3% 100.0%
status

divorced Count 1 2 7 7 4 0 21

% within marital
4.8% 9.5% 33.3% 33.3% 19.0% 0.0% 100.0%
status

widowed Count 1 0 3 3 0 1 8

% within marital
12.5% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 0.0% 12.5% 100.0%
status
Total Count 11 26 76 91 57 10 271

% within marital
4.1% 9.6% 28.0% 33.6% 21.0% 3.7% 100.0%
status

Chi-Square Tests
 Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 10.220 15 .806
Likelihood Ratio 12.489 15 .642
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.698 1 .193
N of Valid Cases 271

a. 12 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .30.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for marital status a

(single / married/defacto)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

highest education level

271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%
achieved * quality of sleep
 highest education level achieved * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep Total

very
very poor poor fair good good excellent

highest primary Count 1 0 1 0 1 0 3

education school % within highest
level education level 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 100.0%
achieved achieved

secondary Count 2 4 9 10 7 1 33
school % within highest
education level 6.1% 12.1% 27.3% 30.3% 21.2% 3.0% 100.0%
achieved

Count 3 2 10 11 4 1 31
 trade % within highest
training/ post education level
9.7% 6.5% 32.3% 35.5% 12.9% 3.2% 100.0%
secondary achieved
training

undergradua Count 1 5 22 29 13 2 72
te degree % within highest
education level 1.4% 6.9% 30.6% 40.3% 18.1% 2.8% 100.0%
achieved

postgraduate Count 4 15 34 41 32 6 132

degree % within highest
education level 3.0% 11.4% 25.8% 31.1% 24.2% 4.5% 100.0%
achieved
Total Count 11 26 76 91 57 10 271

% within highest
education level 4.1% 9.6% 28.0% 33.6% 21.0% 3.7% 100.0%
achieved

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 18.195a 20 .575

Likelihood Ratio 15.576 20 .743
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.182 1 .140
N of Valid Cases 271

a. 15 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .11.
 Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for highest

education level achieved a

(primary school / secondary

school)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

do you smoke * quality of sleep 271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%

do you smoke * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very poor poor fair good very good excellent Total

do you smoke yes Count 3 3 7 13 6 2 34

% within do you smoke 8.8% 8.8% 20.6% 38.2% 17.6% 5.9% 100.0%

no Count 8 23 69 78 51 8 237
 % within do you smoke 3.4% 9.7% 29.1% 32.9% 21.5% 3.4% 100.0%
Total Count 11 26 76 91 57 10 271

% within do you smoke 4.1% 9.6% 28.0% 33.6% 21.0% 3.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.938a 5 .558

Likelihood Ratio 3.476 5 .627
Linear-by-Linear Association .055 1 .814
N of Valid Cases 271

a. 3 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.25.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for do you smoke a

(yes / no)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.

Case Processing Summary

 Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

HADS Depression * quality of

271 100.0% 0 0.0% 271 100.0%
sleep

HADS Depression * quality of sleep Crosstabulation

quality of sleep

very poor poor fair good very good excellent Total

HADS Depression 0 Count 0 1 2 14 15 3 35

% within HADS Depression 0.0% 2.9% 5.7% 40.0% 42.9% 8.6% 100.0%

1 Count 2 5 14 15 13 1 50

% within HADS Depression 4.0% 10.0% 28.0% 30.0% 26.0% 2.0% 100.0%

2 Count 1 4 11 14 10 2 42

% within HADS Depression 2.4% 9.5% 26.2% 33.3% 23.8% 4.8% 100.0%

3 Count 1 2 12 16 8 1 40

% within HADS Depression 2.5% 5.0% 30.0% 40.0% 20.0% 2.5% 100.0%

4 Count 1 2 6 11 2 1 23

% within HADS Depression 4.3% 8.7% 26.1% 47.8% 8.7% 4.3% 100.0%

5 Count 0 1 7 7 4 1 20

% within HADS Depression 0.0% 5.0% 35.0% 35.0% 20.0% 5.0% 100.0%

6 Count 3 0 8 3 0 0 14

% within HADS Depression 21.4% 0.0% 57.1% 21.4% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

7 Count 0 3 5 3 3 1 15
 % within HADS Depression 0.0% 20.0% 33.3% 20.0% 20.0% 6.7% 100.0%

8 Count 1 0 4 3 0 0 8

% within HADS Depression 12.5% 0.0% 50.0% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

9 Count 1 1 4 1 0 0 7

% within HADS Depression 14.3% 14.3% 57.1% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

10 Count 0 3 1 2 1 0 7

% within HADS Depression 0.0% 42.9% 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 100.0%

11 Count 1 3 2 2 1 0 9

% within HADS Depression 11.1% 33.3% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 0.0% 100.0%

12 Count 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

% within HADS Depression 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Total Count 11 26 76 91 57 10 271

% within HADS Depression 4.1% 9.6% 28.0% 33.6% 21.0% 3.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 90.558a 60 .007

Likelihood Ratio 86.441 60 .014
Linear-by-Linear Association 27.177 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 271

a. 61 cells (78.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .04.
 Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for HADS a

Depression (0 / 1)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be

computed. They are only computed for a 2*2
table without empty cells.