ISCC - EU - Procedure - Farm - Plantation - v3.2 IDSA - K3

ISCC EU Audit Procedures for Farm/ Plantation
No
Template Remarks Risk level Audit intensity
.
Basic data Farm/ Not
0 Basic data of the farm/plantation audited
Plantation applicable
Verification of ISCC Principle 1, Requirements for the production
land use and of biomass according to ISCC 202 Sustainability
land use change requirements for the production of biomass Risk assessment, and by that, the sample size has already been
1 ISCC Principle 2 – 6, Requirements for the determined by the auditor in the framework of the audit of the first
Ecological and
production of biomass according to ISCC 202 gathering point
social
Sustainability requirements for the production of
sustainability
biomass
High The documents of three successive months should be checked completely
Within Template No. 3 the risk of a flawed Medium The documents of one month should be checked completely and random
2 Traceability documentation has to be evaluated (applicable for samples should be taken from three successive months
individually certified farms/plantations) Regular Documents taken from random samples of three successive months should
be checked
Greenhouse gas Application of default values, disaggregated Not
3
(GHG) emissions default values or actual values. applicable
List of Best Not
Practices, Non- Defined list of all points marked „no“ in the applicable
4
conformities list column Conformity
and Measures
Please read the guidelines carefully before completing the audit procedures!
 This template is to be applied for certification audits of Farms and Plantations. The procedure has also to be applied for sample audits of Farms and Plantations in the
framework of certification audits of First Gathering Points and Central Offices. In case of sample audits, an individual procedure has to be completed for each sample
audit.
 This template of the audit procedure must not be altered by the user.
 This audit procedure contains four chapters.
 The criteria of the six ISCC Principles are divided into „Major Musts” and „Minor Musts“. A precondition for a successful audit is the compliance with all criteria of
ISCC Principle 1, of all Major Musts of the ISCC Principles 2 to 6, as well as a minimum of 60% compliance with all Minor Musts.
 If a farm/plantation within the EU is controlled via the European Cross Compliance and other controlling systems (e.g. EMAS), the auditor only needs to verify the
compliance with ISCC Principle 1.
 For countries that have ratified the ILO Standard Convention, it may be assumed that the social requirements (ISCC Principle 4) are fulfilled, unless the auditor
arrives to a different result in the framework of the risk assessment and during the audit.
 If a requirement is not applicable for a specific audit, it must not be answered. The auditor moves on to the next relevant requirement.
 For all relevant requirements, it is mandatory to mark the “conformity” with either „yes“ (conformity) or „no“ (non-conformity).
© ISCC System GmbH ISCC EU Audit Procedure Farm/ Plantation 3.2 Date: 08 August 2017
 For every “no” the auditor must explain the decision in column „findings“.
 Every “no” requires the definition of corrective measures in chapter 4. The unique number of non-compliant requirements must be stated. The implementation of
corrective measures must be verified and confirmed by the auditor.
 For some requirements the auditor may be required to provide detailed information in the column finding. Those requirements contain a clear note in the column
finding that must not be removed.
 If a question or requirement requires the statement of sustainable materials, the materials have to be stated according to the ISCC List of Material in its current
version.
 Please note that due to technical reasons the number of the requirements and chapters may not be continuous
 In the audit procedure the acronym RED refers to the Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC amended through Directive (EU) 2015/1513. The acronym FQD refers
to the Fuel Quality Directive 2009/30/EC amended through Directive EU 2015/1513
© ISCC System GmbH ISCC EU Audit Procedure Farm/ Plantation 3.2 Date: 08 August 2017 2
0.0. Certification Body
0.0.1. Name of Certification Body
0.1. System User (Farm/Plantation
that is subject of the audit)
0.1.1. Company Name
0.1.2. Address of the operational unit
that is subject to the audit
0.1.3. Street
0.1.4. Street No
0.1.5. Postal Code
0.1.6. Place
0.1.7. Country
0.1.8. Geo Coordinates: Latitude in
decimal degrees
(Example: 50.941218)
0.1.9. Geo Coordinates: Longitude in
decimal degrees
(Example: 6.958337)
0.1.1 ISCC System
0.
0.1.1 Name of employee responsible for
1. ISCC implementation*
0.1.1 Title*
2.
0.1.1 Last Name*
3.
0.1.1 First Name*
4.
0.1.1 Phone*
5.
0.1.1 E-Mail*
6.
0.1.1 Contact details (e.g. email, phone)
7. of relevant department within
company for ISCC
implementation)*
0.1.1 Type of Operation/ Scope to be ☒ Farm/ Plantation
8. audited

* Information not relevant for sample audits

© ISCC System GmbH ISCC EU Audit Procedure Farm/ Plantation 3.2 Date: 08 August 2017 Page 3 of 79
0.1.1 Is the Operational unit certified ☐ Individually certified
9. individually or audited as a part of ☒ Audited as part of a sample
a sample?
0.1.2 ISCC Registration Number
0. (of the ISCC System User
registered to be certified)
0.1.2 Recertification* ☐ yes
1. ☒ no
0.1.2 Year of initial ISCC certification*
2.
0.2. Audit Specific Data
0.2.1. Name of Lead Auditor
0.2.2. Name(s) of further auditors of the
team
0.2.3. Place of the Audit
0.2.4. Date of the Audit
0.2.5. Duration of the Audit (in hours, in
digits)
0.2.6. Name(s) of company
representative(s) present during
the audit
0.2.7. Name(s) of relevant service
providers/ sub-contractors (e.g.
logistic providers, plant protection
service providers, etc.)
0.2.8. In case of an individual GHG
calculation:
Name of the GHG auditor or
expert verifying the GHG
calculation
0.2.1 Sustainable output material(s)
2. according to the ISCC list of
materials
0.2.1 What GHG option is used for the ☐ total default value
3. outgoing sustainable material? ☐ disaggregated default value
(multiple choice is possible) ☒ actual value (individually calculated value)
☐ NUTS2 value
0.2.1 Is material claimed as ISCC ☒ yes
4. compliant? ☐ no
(Guidance on the claim "ISCC
Compliant" is available in ISCC
System Document 203)*
0.2.1 Are waste or residues or waste or ☒ yes
5. residue-based products handled, ☐ no
or processed, or sold and claimed
under ISCC?
0.2.1 Are storage facilities (external or ☐ yes: individually certified storage facilities
6. internal e.g. warehouses, tank ☐ yes: non-certified storage facilities
terminals, etc.) used to store ☒ no
sustainable material?
If yes, a list of warehouses must
be provided to ISCC. A sample of
non-certified storage facilities has
to be audited*
0.2.1 If storage facilities (external and Number of individually certified storage facilities: _____________________
7. internal) are used, please indicate Number of non-certified storage facilities: ___________________________
the numbers of storage facilities*
0.2.1 What is the risk level applied for ☒ Regular (risk level 1.0)
8. the sampling of storage facilities ☐ Medium (risk level 1.5)
with regard to the compliance of ☐ High (risk level 2.0)
the relevant ISCC requirements?*
0.2.1 How many storage facilities have
9. been audited based on a sample
(individually certified collecting
points don’t have to be included)*
0.2.2 Are other sustainability ☐ yes
0. certification system(s) used, in ☐ no
particular those systems which
are recognized under the RED?
(This includes systems, which are
used simultaneously to ISCC
and/or during the 12 months prior
to the audit.)*
0.2.2 If yes, please specify the name of
1. the system(s)
0.2.2 Overall risk level applied during ☐ Regular (risk level 1.0)
2. the audit (risk level regarding ☐ Medium (risk level 1.5)
documentation and sampling)* ☐ High (risk level 2.0)
0.2.2 Major risk indicator(s) identified.
3. Indicate the relevant risk factor(s)
(general risk indicators, particular
risk indicator for farms/plantations
and/or for waste and residues
according to ISCC System
Document 204 “Audit
Requirements and Risk
Management” (e.g. proximity to
and/or overlapping with no-go-
areas, type of point of origin,
indication of flawed, deficient or
not accessible documentation)*
0.2.2 Tools and information sources
4 used to determine risk factor*
0.2.2 Risk level applied regarding a ☐ Regular (risk level 1.0)
5. flawed documentation of the ☐ Medium (risk level 1.5)
audited operational unit (i.e. risk ☐ High (risk level 2.0)
level for traceability)
0.2.2 Add-ons applied (if applicable) ☐ No add-ons applied ☐ Classified Chemicals ☐ GHG Emissions ☐ Non-GMO for Food and
8. Feed
☐ Environmental ☐ SAI Gold ☐ Consumables ☐ Non-GMO for Technical
Management and Markets
Biodiversity
0.7. Farm/ Plantation Information

0.7.1. Status of the farm/plantation ☐ Individually certified
☒ Part of First Gathering Point
☐ Member of group of farms/ plantations
0.7.2. Has the farm been audited ☒ Yes, date: _______________
before? ☐ No
0.7.3. Is the farm/plantation using ☐ Yes
subcontractors? ☒ No
0.7.4. Does the entire farm or plantation, ☐ Yes
including own and leased land, ☒ No
participate in the EU Cross
Compliance (CC) system and
receive EU subsidies in
this framework?
0.7.5. Is there evidence for compliance ☐ Yes
with the EU CC status of all fields, ☐ No
farmland and other cultivated
areas managed by the farmer
(e.g. valid copies of the CC
decision for subsidies)?
0.7.6. Did land use change take place ☐ Yes If yes, please specify the type of land use change:
after January 2008? ☒ No
0.7.7. Are ISCC requirements for delivery ☒ Yes
notes fulfilled by farm? ☐ No
(not applicable if farm is part of
First Gathering Point)
0.7.1 Agricultural production areas
0. covered by certification (in ha).
Please indicate the size for all
applicable types of agricultural
operations:
0.7.1 Smallholder1 ☐500 – 5,000 ☐ 5,000 – 20,000 ☐> 20,000
1.
0.7.1 Individual farm ☐500 – 5,000 ☐ 5,000 – 20,000 ☐> 20,000
2.
0.7.1 Plantation ☒500 – 5,000 ☐ 5,000 – 20,000 ☐> 20,000
3.
0.7.1 Crop details 0.7.17. 0.7.18. 0.7.19. 0.7.20. 0.7.21.
4. (for crops harvested during the Total amount per Month and Year of Month and Year of Type of GHG (2 GHG emissions from
12-month period prior to the crop (in mt) sowing harvesting Only required for crops cultivation (eec) in kg
audit) Not applicable (n.a.) to be delivered as CO2eq/ dry-ton of crop
for perennial crops sustainable Only required for crops
(e.g. palm) to be delivered as
sustainable), not
applicable (n.a.) if
default values are
applied
(2 1: Total Default value, 2: Disaggregated Default values, 3: NUTS2-value, 4: Individually calculated GHG value (actual value)
1
Smallholders are farmers growing a cash crop alongside other subsistence crops on areas usually smaller than 39 ha. The smallholding farm generally provides the main source of
income for the family owning the land, and the family usually conducts most of the labour
No. Requirements Verification guidance Evidence/ Documents Category Findings Conformity
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
1.1. General (not applicable for farms/ plantations audited as part of a sample)
1.1.1. Is the management system Verify whether there is a Documentation of the management NA v
appropriate with respect to management system in place. system and interviews of personnel,
type, complexity and Verify whether the system intranet, QM system, QM handbook
volume of the operations covers sustainability
and takes risk factors into requirements at all relevant
X
account? operations. Verify if risk factors
like expertise, education and
training of employees and
service providers,
subcontractors are covered.
1.1.2. Have relevant information Verify distribution lists and Distribution list, emails, letters, NA v
and documents been demand documents from relevant managements system
distributed to the personnel, warehouses, documents
competent employees, subcontractors and service
X
warehouses and service providers.
providers, subcontractors,
customers and other
interested parties?
1.1.3. Have employees been Verify responsibility and Organization chart, job and NA v
appointed who are authorization of appointed responsibility descriptions, QM system,
responsible for the personnel regarding critical distribution lists for internal guidelines,
implementation, control points like incoming and updating procedures
verification, development outgoing materials, warehouse X
and updating of the ISCC bookkeeping, weighbridge,
requirements at all critical logistics, sales and distribution,
control points? quality control, etc., Interview
relevant personnel.
1.1.4. Did trainings take place Verify training material, course Training course planning, training NA v
appropriate to the needs of planning documents and documents, distribution lists, emails,
the employees at critical whether the relevant employees participant lists, certificates X
control points? participated in the training.
Interview participants.
1.1.5. Has an internal Visual inspection of audit report Report, action plan, progress report X NA v
audit/inspection/assessmen (inspection should take place at
t regarding the least once a year). Verify if the
implementation of ISCC audit report takes into account
taken place (e.g. by the relevant service providers,
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
employees named above)? subcontractors and/or suppliers
(e.g. farms).
1.1.6. Did reviews of the internal Verify whether the management Review report, minutes, protocol, NA v
audit report by the has reviewed the internal audit interview management personnel, QM
X
organization's management report (should take place at system
take place? least once a year)
1.1.7. Are the internal processes Verify if the documentation Material flow charts, process NA v
documented appropriately? includes e.g. process descriptions. Production reports,
descriptions, main product(s) organization charts, etc.
X
and by-products, waste and
residues and losses within the
process, flow charts etc.
1.1.8. Are sufficient procedure Verify procedures (e.g. regarding Material flow charts, standard NA v
descriptions with respect to traceability, mass balance, GHG operating procedures, job and
sustainability requirements calculation etc.) at critical responsibility descriptions,
available for all critical control points (e.g. raw material organization chart, contracts with
control points? sourcing, conversion process, service providers/ subcontractors
X
logistics of incoming and
outgoing goods, inventory
control, sales and distribution,
quality assurance, warehouse
bookkeeping, weighbridge, etc.)
1.1.9. Is the technical equipment Verify whether weighbridges, Weighbridge ticket, sensor display, NA v
and infrastructure available flow meters, sensors, measuring computer system reports, display,
and in operation for the devices etc. are available, fully computer reports regarding process
critical control points? functional and calibrated, in parameters, filling status, etc. X
particular in the areas of site
gate, silos, warehouse,
conversion process, etc.
1.1.1 Are all necessary Documents should be requested  Plant operation permit, plant X NA v
0. documents, records, prior to the audit. If certain layout plan, silo plan, tank plan,
reports, information and documents (e.g. weighbridge silo/warehouse capacity, tank
data according to ISCC tickets) are not available prior to capacity,
Document 203 available the audit, availability (in  Weighbridge tickets, delivery
and accessible (please also a timely manner) must be notes, bill of lading, sustainability
see Evidence/Documents)? ensured during the audit. declaration/Proof of Sustainability
Records (e.g. weighbridge or other documents for
tickets, contracts, etc.) must incoming and outgoing sustainable
material,
ensure a comprehensible link to
 Periodical reporting on opening
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
products and deliveries. Please and closing stock for incoming and
be aware that the outgoing sustainable and non-
documentation is the basis for sustainable material,
the risk assessment to be  List and corresponding contracts
conducted by the external (CB) with relevant subcontractors,
auditor. service providers (e.g.
warehouses, dependent collectors,
etc.),
 Report and action plan of the
last/previous external audit (n.a.
during first certification),
 Mass balance system/ calculation,
 List and corresponding contracts
with all suppliers (including
farms/plantations, points of origin
and certified suppliers) and
recipients of sustainable material,
 Production report (periodically,
annually) including conversion and
allocation factor (if not provided
within GHG calculation) and
description of waste/residues,
losses and co-products (if relevant
and applicable e.g. for processing
units),
 Written commitment by the
management to comply with
the requirements of the ISCC
system.
1.1.1 Is it ensured, that no Verify if the audited site has a Certificates, databases and registries X NA v
1. hopping between history of certification under one of certification schemes, interview
certification schemes is (or more) recognized with personnel
performed with the certification scheme(s). Check,
intention to cover or which other sustainability
conceal violations of other certification schemes are
certification schemes and/or currently being used or have
violations against been used within the previous
regulations laid down in the 12 months. Check with the
RED? respective other certification
scheme(s) if certificates have
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
been withdrawn within the
previous 12 months.
1.1.1 Is it ensured, that the Check, which other Certificates, databases and registries NA v
2. operational unit is currently sustainability certification of certification schemes, "blacklists",
(at the date of the audit) schemes have been used within interview with personnel
not blacklisted by another the previous 12 months. Check
certification system if certificates have been
recognized by the European withdrawn within the previous
X
Commission in the 12 months. Verify that the
framework of the RED? operational unit is currently (at
the date of the audit) not
blacklisted by another
sustainability certification
scheme.
1.1.1 Did the risk assessment Risk assessment to be Documents required by ISCC, X NA v
3. regarding a flawed conducted by the external (CB) certificates, databases and registries
documentation of the auditor: of certification schemes
audited site take place 1. Regular risk: above-
based on the above- mentioned documents are
mentioned documents, accurately managed, up to date,
reports, information and complete and accessible without
data? problems
2. Medium risk: above-
mentioned documents are not
managed accurately and are not
accessible without problems
3. High risk: above-mentioned
documents are not up to date
and not complete.
Note: The use of other
certification schemes must be
taken into account appropriately
during the risk assessment
(certification under multiple
schemes at the same time may
be one of the factors for a
higher risk).
The result of the risk
assessment drives the audit
intensity with respect to
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
traceability, mass balance and
documents to be verified during
the audit:
Regular risk: auditor must check
a random document sample
from three successive months
Medium risk: auditor must check
a random document sample
from three successive months
plus documents from one
complete month
High risk: auditor must check
documents of three successive
months completely
1.1.1 Are the above-mentioned Verify if documentation for five ISCC registration, relevant documents, NA v
4. documents kept for at least years is covered within the QM system
five years? management system. Verify the
X
oldest documents available
(starting with the registration
with ISCC).
1.1.1 Are documents and Verify that no access of third Distribution lists, emails and access NA v
5. information treated parties to confidential authorizations to data bases
confidential and are they documents, information, X
not made accessible to third databases, etc. is possible.
parties?
1.1.1 Is it ensured, that the Only applicable for individually Confirmation email from ISCC NA v
6. system user has submitted certified farms/plantations.
to ISCC the reporting Verify if the system user has
template provided by ISCC, received the confirmation email
on the amount of raw from ISCC confirming that the X
materials and/or final reporting obligation was fulfilled.
biofuels certified according
to ISCC in the previous
calendar year?
1.1.1 Is it ensured that the Only applicable for individually Confirmation email from ISCC, X NA v
7 reporting template has certified farms/plantations. Summary of amounts reported to ISCC
been submitted in due time Verify if the reporting template (provided by ISCC together with the
and contained complete has been submitted to ISCC in confirmation email), Mass balance
and truthful information? due time. Check the summary of
reported amounts provided by
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
ISCC, if the information reported
to ISCC was complete and
correct (compare with mass
balance).
1.1.1 Are the latest and signed Latest and signed ISCC terms of use, NA v
8 ISCC terms of use available? for latest version check www.iscc- X
system.org
7.1. Farm/ Plantation | Audit Template No. 1: Audit of sustainability criteria
of sustainability criteria
7.1.1. Is it ensured that the entire Biomass produced on land, Interview with the farmer, documents X 1. V
land of a farm/ plantation which is in compliance with the of production and property show that
including agricultural land, ISCC principles 1 to 6, is the farmer does not produce on other
pasture, forest and any considered sustainable and ISCC farms/ plantations that do violate the
other land (farmland) compliant. ISCC-System.
complies with the ISCC Compliance with ISCC principle State facilities, Citizens and NGOs can
standard 202 (Principle 1 – 1 is required for the entire land verify the observations.
6). of the farm from the beginning.
Continuous improvement for
areas not fully compliant with
ISCC principles 2-6 possible
within a specified time period.
Control that farms/ plantations
will only be declared as
compliant to the ISCC System, if
the farmers do fulfill ISCC
principles 1-6 at the entire land.
All areas of one farm/ plantation
must be in compliance with the
ISCC principles.
If areas do not fully comply with
ISCC principle 2-6, verify
whether non-compliant areas
can be clearly separated and a
plan to reach full compliance is
set by the farmer, exists. The
plan shall specify continuous
improvement and times. Verify,
whether material from this area
has not been sold as ISCC
compliant or sustainable.
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
Document check, use of
databases, satellite images etc.
to verify compliance.
7.1.2. Is it ensured, that biomass Control, that biomass is not Evidence of compliance can be V
is not obtained from land produced on land that had the demonstrated by e.g. comparing aerial
that in or after January 2008 status of forestland in or after photographs, satellite images, land
had the status of January 2008, no matter register documents (e.g. field record
forestland? whether or not the land still has system, documents of land registry,
this status. land certificates, GPS-based crop
Forest land comprises yield), maps, site surveys or
 Primary forests; management plans from 31.12.2007
 Forests and other or earlier with today’s status of the
wooded land that are farmland.
covered with native tree Environmental assessments of
species and do not show expansions since 1st January 2008
clearly visible show that no conversion of forestland X
indications of human took place. Appropriate assessment
activity and the tools are e.g. databases like GRAS,
ecological processes are Modis Land Cover Database, Intact
not significantly Forest Landscapes database etc., and/
disturbed. or maps by NGOs (e.g. IUCN, WWF-
This requirement will normally especially in Indonesia, Vida)
be demonstrated with evidence
showing that there has been no
land use change, e.g. ‘positive’
evidence showing the area was
already cropland in 2008. (see
ISCC 202, 1.1.(1))
7.1.3. Is it ensured, that no Check if the farmland is A comparison of the farmland with the X V
cultivation occurred on completely or partially situated areas for nature protection purposes
areas that serve the in nature protection areas. (designated by law, Natura 2000,
purpose of nature Areas for nature protection designated by nature law of third
protection unless the nature purposes comprise areas, which countries, World Database on
protection aims are not are designated by law or by the Protected Areas (WDPA) or the
endangered? relevant competent authority to Integrated Biodiversity Assessment
serve the purpose of nature Tool (IBAT) or other databases show,
protection. that plant cultivation does not occur
Compare in European Union on one of these protected areas).
Member States the farmland Document check, use of databases,
with the biotopes protected by satellite images etc. to verify
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
law and Natura 2000 areas. In compliance.
third countries search for similar If crop cultivation and harvest of
laws and designated protection biomass occurs on areas for nature
areas. Analyze the World protection purposes interviews with
Database on Protected Areas the farmer and employees and the
(WDPA), the Integrated analysis of the operational documents
Biodiversity Assessment Tool show that nature protection
(IBAT) or other databases. requirements are observed. Check the
The protection purpose and the knowledge of the farmer and the other
respective imperatives and workers also on the relevant
interdictions must be followed imperatives and interdictions.
according to the relevant
protected area declaration. As
long as a Natura 2000 area has
not been placed under
protection order, the relevant
preservation objectives are
authoritative. (see ISCC 202,
1.1.(2))
7.1.4. Is it ensured, that the Compare the farmland areas Document check, use of databases, X V
regulations for areas that with the protected areas listed satellite images etc. to verify
serve the purpose of the in the IUCN Database. compliance.
protection of rare, The HCV tool also covers further Internationally recognized tools and
threatened or vulnerable important ecosystems and protocols may be used to identify HCV
ecosystems or species, or species, ecosystem services and areas. Documentation identifying
areas for the protection of community livelihoods as well as where HCVs occur. Where HCV is not a
rare, threatened or cultural values. Compare well-known concept, existing systems
endangered ecosystems or farmland with potential HCV- may be used to identify the values. At
species recognized by areas and if HCV-criteria have a national level, surveys by
international agreements or been followed in the international associations,
included in lists drawn up identification of land status. environmental agencies or authorities
by intergovernmental Where the biomass production may be in place to identify important
organizations or the does not interfere with areas for biodiversity conservation.
International Union for the protection purposes, appropriate Consultation with stakeholders might
Conservation of Nature are management measures to be important as a means of
followed? implement any legal verification
requirements relating to the
protection of species and
habitats are met and illegal or
inappropriate hunting, fishing or
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
collecting activities are
controlled. (see ISCC 202, 1.1.
(3))
7.1.5. Is it ensured, that biomass Check whether harvesting of Evidence of compliance can be X V
is not obtained from land raw material is necessary to demonstrated by e.g. comparing aerial
that in or after January 2008 preserve the grassland status or photographs, satellite images, land
had the status of highly not. Where evidence is provided register documents (e.g. field record
biodiverse grassland? that the harvesting of the raw system, documents of land registry,
material is necessary to land certificates, GPS-based crop
preserve the grassland status, yield), maps, site surveys or
no further evidence to show management plans from 31.12.2007
compliance with that criterion is or earlier with today’s status of the
needed. If not: farmland.
Check if farmland had in or after
January 2008 the status of
highly biodiverse grassland:
“Natural highly biodiverse
grassland” and “non natural
highly biodiverse grassland” are
distinguished:
“Natural highly biodiverse
grassland” means grassland
that:
(a) would remain grassland in
the absence of human
intervention; and
(b) maintains the naturals
species composition and
ecological characteristics and
processes.
“Human intervention” means
managed grazing, mowing,
cutting harvesting or burning.
“Non-natural highly biodiverse
grassland means grassland that:
(a) would cease to be grassland

in the absence of human
intervention; and
(b) is not degraded, that is to
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
say it is not characterised by
long-term loss of biodiversity
due to for instance overgrazing,
mechanical damage to the
vegetation, soil erosion or loss
of soil quality; and
(c) is species-rich.
If a grassland conversion is
anticipated or already has taken
place, the further guidance and
requirements on the
identification of highly
biodiverse grassland according
to ISCC document 202 Annex 2
must be followed. (see ISCC
202, 1.1.(4))
7.1.6. Is it ensured, that biomass Check if any farmland had in or Evidence of compliance can be X V
is not obtained from land after January 2008 the status of demonstrated by e.g. comparing aerial
that in or after January 2008 a wetland, namely land that is photographs, satellite images, land
had the status of wetland covered with or saturated by register documents (e.g. field record
and no longer has the water permanently or for a system, documents of land registry,
status? significant part of the year. land certificates, GPS-based crop
Wetlands can be natural or yield), maps, site surveys or
artificial, permanent or management plans from 31.12.2007
temporary, with water that is or earlier with today’s status of the
static or flowing, fresh, brackish farmland.
or salt, including areas of Appropriate assessment tools are e.g.
marine water the depth of which databases like GRAS, RAMSAR
at low tide does not exceed six Convention, Modis Land Cover
meters. (e.g. marsh, fen) Database, World Intact Forest
Compare with wetland status in Landscape Database.
the list of internationally The determination and objective
important wetlands according to evidence of the carbon stock of the
article 2, section 1 of the area before the conversion on the
Convention of February 2nd basis of exact measurements is
1971 (RAMSAR Convention). The necessary to prove that the
conservation of the status of a greenhouse gas emission saving is
wetland also implies that this fulfilled before and after the
condition is not to be changed conversion. Canopy cover can be
or compromised. Raw material estimated visually (e.g. USDA field
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
production on wetlands might manual).
be acceptable as long as the Interviews with states Environmental
status of the wetland is not Agency staff; farmer and their
changed. (see ISCC 202, 1.2.(1)) employees or other stakeholders
(NGOs) can help to confirm that high
carbon stock land is not used.
7.1.7. Is it ensured, that biomass Check if any farmland had in or X V
is not obtained from land after January 2008 the status of
that in or after January 2008 a continuously forested area,
had the status of namely areas that:
continuously forested areas  Stretch over more than 1
and not longer has the hectare with trees higher
status? than 5 meters and a canopy
cover of more than 30%, or
trees able to reach these
thresholds on the respective
site. A conversion is not
allowed.
 Stretch over more than 1
hectare with trees higher
than 5 meters and a canopy
cover of between 10% and
30%, or trees able to reach
these thresholds in situ. A
conversion is not allowed
unless reliable evidence is
provided that the carbon
stock of the area before and
after conversion is such that
the requirements regarding
the greenhouse gas saving,
required by ISCC, would be
fulfilled.
 The term continuously
forested does not include
land that is predominantly
under agricultural use (e.g.
short rotation coppice)
Canopy cover is the
percentage of ground
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
covered by a vertical
projection of the outermost
limits of the natural spread
of the foliage of trees.
The status of forest areas
includes all stages of
development and age. Thus, it is
quite possible that the canopy
cover temporarily falls below 10
or 30 %, e.g. after tree harvest
or a natural hazard (e.g.
windfall). Such incidents do,
however, not change the status
of the area as forested area as
long reforestation or natural
succession is ensured within a
justifiable time.
Continuously forested areas are
to be judged as entity, no
matter how much of this
continuously forested area lies
within the farmland or the
production area. Accordingly,
the whole area is the basis for
the calculation of the threshold
values of 10 or 30%.
If the total area of the forested
area exceeds 1 ha and is
stocked with trees higher than 5
meters, the area and each part
of it that lies within the farmland
or the production area is termed
continuously forested area. Even
if only 0.5 ha of the continuously
forested area lie within the
farmland, these 0.5 ha must be
classified as continuously
forested area just like the total
forested area. (see ISCC 202,
1.2.(2) and 1.2.(3))
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
7.1.8. Is it ensured that biomass is Possible only if it is proven that Evidence of compliance can be V
not produced on land that the cultivation and harvesting of demonstrated by e.g. comparing aerial
was peatland in January this raw material does not photographs, satellite images, land
2008 or thereafter? involve drainage of previously register documents (e.g. field record
undrained soils or if it can be system, documents of land registry,
proven that land was already land certificates, GPS-based crop
completely drained in January yield), maps, site surveys or
2008. management plans from 31.12.2007
Control that biomass is not or earlier with today’s status of the
produced on peatland or if it is farmland. Interviews with states
produced on land that was Environmental Agency staff, farmer
partially drained in January and their employees or other
2008, the land is not stakeholders (NGOs) can help to
subsequently deeper drained. confirm that peatland is not used.
X
Peatland soils are soils with Environmental assessment of
horizons of organic material expansions since 1st January 2008
(peat substrate) of a cumulative shows that no conversion of land with
thickness of at least 30 cm at a high biodiversity value took place.
depth of down to 60 cm. The Appropriate assessment tools are e.g.
organic matter contains at least databases like Harmonized World Soil
20 mass percent of organic Database.
carbon in the fine soil.
Peatland soils that have been
completely drained for cropping
before January 2008 and that
are not subsequently deeper
drained, are allowed for biomass
production. (see ISCC 202, 1.3)
7.1.9. Is it ensured, that if areas Control if land use changes took Proof by maps, satellite-databases, X V
have been converted in or place after the respective time farm records etc.
after January 2008, the of reference. In this case, the If the audit detects that land use has
conversion and use are in areas shall not violate the been changed after January 2008, the
accordance with the protection areas mentioned auditor has to verify in detail the
requirements of principle 1? above. status before land use change. If this
procedure shows that any land of a
farm/plantation before land use
change fell under Principle 1, it is
forbidden to certify the biomass under
ISCC.
If the farmer cannot show all relevant
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
land use rights or protected areas
were changed after January 2008
certification is not possible.
If the converted land did not fall under
prohibited land use changes of
Principle 1, the auditor has to verify if
the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
of the land use changes have been
included (see also template No. 3).
The use of GHG default values is not
possible.
7.1.1 Is it ensured, that an If any of the activities took place Local inspection shows that new V
0. environmental impact at the farm, an impact buildings, cultivation areas, drainage
assessment is conducted assessment must be available to systems do exist.
prior to implementing one show that environmental Expert´s reports, documents of
of the following actions?: impacts have been considered construction and planning and
- New cultivation areas and negative impacts have been environmental tolerance checks show,
or change to intensive kept as little as possible. that environmental impacts have been
agricultural purposes (a) Human beings, fauna and considered and kept as little as
- New buildings flora; possible. Small-scale farmers in lower
X
- Restructuring rural (b) Soil, water, air, climate and income countries are at least able to
land holdings the landscape; explain potential impacts of their
- Drainage systems (c) Material assets and the operations and how they avoid
- Other constructions cultural heritage; potential negative impacts.
or systems (d) The interaction between the
- Water management factors referred to in points (a),
projects (b) and (c).
- Intensive livestock (see ISCC 202 2.1.1)
installations
7.1.1 Is it ensured that damage or Check, whether any land use Objective evidence by on-site visit, X V
1. deterioration of habitats is change took place after 31st document check. Maps on natural
avoided? December 2007. Check vegetation as well as protected areas,
compliance with Principle 1. If existing ecological corridors, buffer
land use change complies with zones show points of actions.
Principle 1, check whether
appropriate management
measures to avoid damage or
deterioration of any important
habitats or species have been
identified and implemented.
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
Any legal requirements relating
to the protection of species and
habitats must be met.
Check whether control measures
to avoid illegal or inappropriate
hunting, fishing, trapping or
collecting activities are
implemented.
Around all protected areas
(covered in Principle 1), set
aside land or wildlife corridors,
appropriate buffer zones shall
be protected, restored or set up.
Buffers include: riparian buffers,
filter strips, grassed waterways,
shelterbelts, windbreaks, living
snow fences, contour grass
strips, cross - wind trap strips,
shallow water areas for wildlife,
field borders, alley cropping,
herbaceous wind barriers, and
vegetative barriers. (see ISCC
202 2.1.2)
7.1.1 Is it ensured, that natural Check whether the producer Document check. Bilateral discussions X V
2. vegetation areas around knows the status of riparian with farmers on awareness.
springs and natural vegetation around springs and Maps of watercourses and springs,
watercourses are natural watercourses. planning contents and re-establishing
maintained or re- Natural watercourses can be plans (with a concrete implementation
established? streams, rivers, canals or other plan) are available. Local inspection of
routes, through which constantly the riparian areas on the farmers land.
or ephemeral/intermittent water
flows, no matter if they are still
unaffected from human
intervention or corrected,
straightened or otherwise
regulated.
Check, whether appropriate
riparian buffer zones to protect
watercourse and wetlands were
set up, maintained and restored
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
taking into consideration crop
planting, application of
fertilizers and plant protection
products and harvesting. Where
natural vegetation in riparian
areas has been removed there is
a plan with a timetable for
recovery. (see ISCC 202 2.1.3)
7.1.1 Is it ensured that all Check if species or genetically Reports on raw materials cultivated on V
3. requirements with respect modified variety is officially the plantation or farm and type and
to highly invasive species prohibited in the country of origins of seed. Databases like the
and genetically modified operation. Global Invasive Species Database
(GM) species are met? Check if the farm/plantation (GISD,
introduced new plant species http://www.issg.org/database/welcome
that are not already established /) in order to verify the invasiveness of
in the country or region, which cultivated raw material. Contracts with
show a high risk of invasive seed producers and buyers. Document
behavior. If yes, check if al check and on-site verification.
existing regulatory frameworks
are followed for such an
introduction. X
If GM species were cultivated,
check any buyer contracts and
legal regulation for restriction
(e.g. on protection of adjacent
farms, wildlife habitats against
invasion and cross-pollination)
and check if they were followed.
Check if traceability and labeling
of GM crops are in line with
requirements of GM crop
recipients or the country of
cultivation. (see ISCC 2.1.4)
7.1.1 Is it ensured that burning The burning of stubble or other Local inspection of the production X
4. restrictions have been crop residues is allowed only areas, if necessary interviews with the
followed? with the permission of employees, NGOs. Manuals/document
competent authority and if there check and check, if relevant
are no viable alternatives. regulations were followed.
Burning as part of land
clearance is prohibited. When
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
burning of stubble or other crop
residues takes place, it is done
in a responsible way (e.g. by
considering influencing factors
like wind direction) (see ISCC
2.1.5)
7.1.1 Is it ensured that crops are Check evidence of good Evidence from the analysis of land V
5. grown on suitable soils? agricultural practices. Check soil maps, topographical maps and local
Have good agricultural management plan aimed at inspection of farmland with regard to
practices with respect to sustainable soil management, prevention and control of erosion, soil
soil quality, soil erosion prevention and erosion nutrient balance, soil organic matter,
contamination and soil control. The plan should refer to: soil pH, soil structure and soil
erosion been addressed in  Prevention and control of biodiversity.
the soil management? erosion; Local inspection of farmland with
 Maintaining and improving respect to the subjects.
balances of soil nutrient Document check and/or other
balance; evidence. Results of soil analysis
 Maintaining and improving available and show improvement of
the situation. X
soil organic matter;
 Maintaining and improving Small-scale farmers in lower income
soil pH; countries are at least able to explain
 Maintaining and improving potential impacts of their operations
soil structure; and how they avoid potential negative
 Maintaining and improving impacts.
soil biodiversity;
 Prevention of salinization.
 Topographical, climate and
pedological characteristics
of soils and the suitability of
crops have been considered.
7.1.1 Is it ensured that measures Evidence of measures to reduce Evidence from the analysis of land- X V
6. and cultivation techniques soil erosion is available. Maps of and topographical maps and local
have been used to reduce fragile soils and topographic inspection of the farmland with regard
the possibility of soil characteristics must be to the soil erosion and compaction
erosion? available. situation as well as the slope of the
A management strategy farmland. Evidence that specific
including measures should exist management strategies have been set
for plantings on slopes above a up for fragile or problematic soils.
certain limit (specified to soil, Interviews with the farmer and/or
climate and topographical other employees.
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
characteristics).
A management strategy
including identified measures
should be in place for other
fragile and problematic soils
(e.g. sandy, low organic matter
soils). Appropriate measures are
inter alia:
 Field tillage practices
 Crop rotation
 Adaptation of field
cultivation techniques
Applied techniques are suitable
for the respective processed
ground. The soil structure shall
be maintained and soil
compaction shall be prevented,
e.g. by an appropriate use of
machinery, an appropriate
timing of on-field work and an
appropriate tire pressure. (see
ISCC 202 2.2.2)
7.1.1 Is it ensured that applied Evidence, where fertilizers come Fertilizer lists, conclusions of soil X V
7. organic and mineral from and if the source is reports and input/ output balances.
fertilizers come from trustworthy (e.g. reputable seed Interview with farmer/ employees and
trustworthy sources, are of producers, cooperatives, service providers.
high quality and used neighbours). Results of soil examinations, fertilizer
according to nutritional Verify if a periodic input/output calculations, application manuals,
requirements? balance of fertilizer application chemical compositions of fertilizers.
has been conducted. Fertilizer Interviews with the farmer and other
application should be based on employees confirm the use of fertilizer
this input/output balance and according to nutritional requirements.
follow professional
recommendations, if available.
Most efficient fertilizer
application is aspired in order to
reduce runoff.
Evidence that application
manuals, the chemical
composition, concentration and
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
concentration are considered
when applying fertilizers.
If organic matter, like Empty
Fruit Bunches (EFB) or other
remaining plant material is used
in the production areas
(mulched), the material is
evenly distributed. (see ISCC
2.3.1)
7.1.1 Is it ensured, that while Verify that fertilizer with a Confirmation by means of lists of use V
8. applying fertilizers with content of more than 1.5% of of fertilizer, records on fertilizer
considerable nitrogen nitrogen in the dry matter are application, local inspection of the
content, care is taken not to not applied onto flooded, water farm/plantation. Interview with farmer/
contaminate the surface logged or frozen soils. Verify if employees and service providers.
and ground water? the producer can demonstrate
that he observes at least a
distance of 3 m to riverbanks
etc. and takes care that there is
no run-off of applied fertilizer X
into surface water bodies and
the ground water. Check, if the
producer examines weather
conditions during surface
application of fertilizers (e.g.
wind speed and direction,
temperature) and takes them
into account. (see ISCC 202
2.3.2)
7.1.1 Is it ensured that the The fertilizer application Maintenance reports, invoices, reports V
9. fertilizer application machinery is kept in good of calibration.
machinery allows for condition and verified
X
accurate fertilizer periodically to ensure accurate
application? fertilizer application. (see ISCC
202 2.3.3)
7.1.2 Is it ensured that Raw sewage sludge is sludge Evidence is available on source of X V
0. restrictions on the use of that is taken untreated from sewage sludge and of pre-treatment
sewage sludge are wastewater treatment plants. and on type/time of application of
followed? Raw sewage sludge shall organic manure, treated sludge and
· The use of raw sewage undergo a treatment before sludge water and/or industrial waste
sludge is not allowed used on the fields. The residues. Lists of fertilizer-use,
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
· Any raw sewage sludge treatment should considerably interviews with farmer/ employees,
must undergo a treatment lower the content of any neighbors and NGOs show that
before it can be used pollutants like lead, cadmium, negative impacts of organic manure,
· Application of treated chromium, copper, nickel, treated sludge and industrial wastes
sewage sludge shall follow mercury, zinc and organic- are kept to a minimum. If applicable
good agricultural practice persistent pollutants. assessment on pollution potential
· Sludge should never be Dewatering is not considered a available.
applied directly to the crop treatment. Treated sewage
after flowering. sludge may only be applied to
soils in a way that it does not
adversely affect communities,
water- or soil quality, the pH of
the soil or the nutritional needs
of crops. The impacts of
applying organic manure,
treated sludge and sludge water
and/or industrial waste residues
shall be kept to a minimum.
Where relevant, this might
include an assessment on the
pollution of ground and surface
water, health risks to workers
and surrounding communities
and an assessment of heavy
metals. (see ISCC 202 2.3.4)
7.1.2 Is it ensured that wastes Agricultural wastes are reduced, Evidence how agricultural wastes and X V
1. and agricultural by-products reused and/or recycled. by-products are handled. Soil organic
are handled sustainable? Agricultural wastes and by- matter balance.
products can be for example Interview with farmer/plantation
composted on-farm and used as manager, employees or locals on
a soil conditioning, sold to traditional uses.
alternative markets or used for
alternative purposes. The use of
agricultural by-products does
not jeopardize the function as
important traditional, regionally
used products (such as fodder,
natural fertilizer, material, local
fuel etc.) and does not occur at
the expense of the soil organic
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
matter or soil nutrients balance
(see ISCC 202 2.3.5)
7.1.2 Are records of fertilizer Complete records of all fertilizer Fertilizer reports V
2. applications available? applications are available
(where, what, how much, date).
This includes:
(1) The name or reference of
the field
(2) Exact dates
(day/month/year) of the
application
X
(3) The trade name, type of
fertilizer
(4) Amount of product, which
was applied in weight or
volume.
(5) Application machinery type
used and the method
(6) Name of the operator.
(see ISCC 202 2.3.6)
7.1.2 Is it ensured that a soil A soil organic matter balance is Soil organic matter balances available. V
3. organic matter balance or compiled (can be generic) or Document check and/ or other
analysis is compiled? every 6 years a soil organic evidence.
X
matter analysis takes place.
Results are kept for 7 years.
(see ISCC 202 2.3.7)
7.1.2 Is it ensured that prohibited Check if the producer is aware Application documents, stock, on-site X v
4. chemicals of the Stockholm of the chemicals applied. Verify visit. Bilateral discussions with
Convention have not been if the producer did not use any farmer/plantation manager or
used and that chemicals chemicals listed in the responsible
listed in WHO1a and 1b as Stockholm Convention on
well as the Annex III of the Persistent Organic Pollutants
Rotterdam Convention area during cultivation activities.
avoided? Verify if the producer has a
basic understanding of the
hazardousness of chemicals
especially with respect to
chemicals listed in WHO 1a) and
1b) as well as the Annex III of
the Rotterdam Convention
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
(UNEP's Prior Informed Consent
(PIC) Program list.
Verify if the producer avoids the
use of those chemicals, e.g. by
using alternatives and envisages
a phase-out.
(see ISCC 202 2.4.1)
7.1.2 Is it ensured that only plant Check if all the plant protection Confirmation by means of inspection V
5. protection products are products applied are officially of the used plant protection products
used that are registered in registered or permitted by the in the storage facilities, field records.
the country of use for the appropriate governmental All products are registered products in
target crop where such organization in the country of the respective country.
official registration scheme application.
exists? Where no official registration X
scheme exists, check if plant
protection products used follow
the FAO International Code of
Conduct on the Distribution and
Use of Pesticides.
(see ISCC 202 2.4.2)
7.1.2 Have local restrictions on Check whether the responsible Control of the farm records, interview V
6. the use of plant protection member of staff/employee or farmer/ employees.
products been followed? farmer are aware of restrictions X
and are following them.
(see ISCC 202 2.4.3)
7.1.2 Is it ensured that all Check, whether all purchased Records on seed and planting material X V
7. purchased seed are seed and plant material comes origin (including name, variety vendor,
legitimized and that an from authorities-recognized location, date of application and
informed choice on seed seed producers or from quantity used per area). Document
varieties and plant trustworthy sources (e.g. check on existing certificates, label
materials was made? reputable seed producers, tags on seed packaging.
cooperatives) and is traceable. On-site verification and bilateral
If self-bred seed is used, check discussion with farmer/plantation
whether applicable seed manager how the choice for
production norms are followed seed/plant material/grafting material
and if legal requirements was made.
regarding intellectual property
rights are met.
Check if an informed choice on
seed varieties and plant
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
materials, grafting material was
made (taking into account e.g.
yield, disease- and pest
resistance, local conditions)
(see ISCC 202 2.4.4)
7.1.2 Are invoices of registered Invoices of the registered plant Relevant documentation available: V
8. plant protection products protection products used must Invoices and delivery notes.
kept? be kept for record keeping and
X
available at the time of the
external inspection.
(see ISCC 202 2.4.5)
7.1.2 Has assistance in The technically responsible Evidence of training e.g. training V
9. implementation of person on the farm has received certificates, confirmation of
Integrated Pest formal documented training participation in a training. Evidence of
Management systems been and/ or the external technical external advice and qualification of the X
obtained through training or IPM consultant can demonstrate external technical IPM consultant.
advice? their technical qualifications.
(see ISCC 202 2.5.1)
7.1.3 Can the producer show Example “Prevention” measures Local inspection of the production V
0. evidence of implementation concern the location of crops, area, field records, interviews with
of at least one activity that crop rotation, cropping pattern, farmer/ employees.
falls in the category of seed selection (including seed
"Prevention"? dressing), crop husbandry and
hygiene (includes measures to
avoid disease cross
contamination like e.g. removing X
of infested or diseased plant
material from the field),
fertilization, irrigation, habitat
management, inter-cropping,
harvesting and storage and
tillage practices.
(see ISCC 202 2.5.2)
7.1.3 Can the producer show The producer can show Confirmation by means of local X V
1. evidence of implementation evidence of implementing at inspection of the production area, field
of at least one activity that least one activity that will records, Interview with farmer/
falls in the category of determine when, and to what employees.
"Observation and extent, pests and their natural
Monitoring"? enemies are present and using
this information to plan what
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
pest management techniques
are required.
Example “Observation and
Monitoring” measures concern
crop monitoring and routine and
regular control of the
appearance of pests, decision
support systems and area-wide
management as well as
identification and control of
present natural pest enemies.
(see ISCC 202 2.5.3)
7.1.3 Can the producer show The producer shows evidence Local inspection of the farmland, farm V
2. evidence of implementation that in situations where pest records, Interview with farmer/
of at least one activity that attack adversely affects the employees.
falls in the category of economic value of a crop;
"Intervention"? intervention took place.
Example “Intervention”
measures concern cultural and
X
physical control, biological
control and chemical control.
They include the use of selective
pesticides rather than broad
spectrum and varying the type
of chemicals. (see ISCC 202
2.5.4)
7.1.3 Is it ensured that the staff Check for competence of plant Control of training-certifications/ X V
3. dealing with plant protection product dealing staff. documentation (official qualifications
protection products is If applied by qualified adviser, or specific training course attendance
competent and envisages technical competence can be certificates, Fax and e-mails from
the use of non-chemical demonstrated via official advisors, governments, and other
solutions? qualifications or specific training suitable institutions are allowable if
course attendance certificates. application was done by qualified
If applied by adviser)
producer/personnel experience Interview with farmer/ technical staff
via technical documentation, shows the existence of technical and
e.g. product technical literature economic knowledge.
or specific training course
attendance.
Check competence of staff
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
dealing with plant protection
products with respect to
parameters taken into
consideration prior and during
application, the application of
precautionary measures, the
use of non-chemical solutions.
(see ISCC 202 2.6.1)
7.1.3 Is it ensured, that the The applicant/responsible can Farm records, maps or other evidence X V
4. application of plant show that good agricultural identifying any populated areas or
protection products is done practices and weather water bodies, local inspections
appropriately? conditions have been including storage facilities.
considered during application. Availability of protection clothing in
The competent person can also accordance with the label instructions
show, that important of the used plant protection products.
parameters have been taken Documented procedures on good
into consideration before agricultural practices during spraying,
applying plant protection label instructions, re-entry times.
products, e.g. the necessity was Interview with responsible member of
given (following visual staff/ workers
inspections, taking into account
economic thresholds of
pest/disease and weed
occurrence, weather forecasts,
local knowledge, no non-
chemical solutions available)
and precautionary measures to
protect workers and neighboring
communities and environment
were applied.
Check if the
applicant/responsible follows
label instructions for products
used (e.g. on protective
clothing, storage, handling,
amount of applied active
ingredient etc.). Check if there
are clear documented
procedures, which regulate all
the re-entry intervals for plant
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
protection products applied to
the crops according to the label
instructions.
If plant protection products are
applied near populated areas or
water bodies, appropriate
distances must be kept (buffer
zones). If plant protection
products are applied aerially,
any residents within 500 m of
the planned application are
notified in advance. Pesticides
classified as WHO1a, 1b or 2 are
not applied aerially within a 500
m distance to any populated
areas or water bodies. (see ISCC
202 2.6.2)
7.1.3 Is it ensured that all Check for documented evidence Relevant documentation available. V
5. application equipment of up to date maintenance Interview with farmers and respective
calibrated? sheets for all repairs, oil employees.
changes, etc. is available. Verify
if application machinery
(automatic and non-automatic)
has been verified for correct
operation within the last 12
X
months and this is certified or
documented either by
participation in an official
scheme (where it exists) or by
having been carried out by a
person who can demonstrate
their competence. (see ISCC 202
2.6.3)
7.1.3 Have all the plant All records are available and Farm records are available and X V
6. protection product complete: complete
applications been recorded? (1) The crop name and/or
variety,
(2) Date, location and trade
name of product
(3) Justification for application,
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
product quantity applied
(4) Application machinery used
and the operator
(5) The common name of the
pest(s), disease(s) or weed(s)
treated
(see ISCC 202 2.6.4)
7.1.3 Is it ensured that Check if the plant protection Local inspection of the plant protection X V
7. appropriate facilities for product storage facilities and product storage facilities and/ or filling
measuring and mixing plant the plant protection product mixing area and the measuring cups
protection products are filling/mixing area (if different) and scales. Interview with responsible
available? have measuring equipment and member of staff/ workers
are equipped with utensils e.g. Local inspection of the storage
buckets, water supply point etc. facilities, documentation about the
for the safe and efficient disposal of the plant protection
handling of all plant protection products.
products.
Check if the graduation of
containers and the calibration of
scales is verified annually by the
farmer/responsible employee to
assure accuracy of mixtures.
Check if the plant protection
product storage facilities and all
designated fixed filling/mixing
areas are equipped with a
container of absorbent inert
material such as sand, floor
brush and dustpan and plastic
bags, that must be signposted
and in a fixed location, to be
used immediately in case of
spillage of plant protection
product.
(see ISCC 202 2.7.1)
Check if there are documented
records that indicate that
obsolete plant protection
products have been disposed of
by officially authorized channels.
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
When this is not possible, check
if obsolete plant protection
products are securely
maintained and identifiable.
They shall be removed and
recycling or disposed following
internationally recognized best
practices like e.g. the FAO
Guidelines for the management
of small quantities of unwanted
and obsolete pesticides. (see
ISCC 202 2.7.2)
7.1.3 Is it ensured that obsolete Check if there are documented Local inspection of the storage V
8. plant protection products records that indicate that facilities, documentation about the
are securely maintained obsolete plant protection disposal of the plant protection
and identified and disposed products have been disposed of products.
of by authorized or by officially authorized channels.
approved channels? When this is not possible, check
if obsolete plant protection
products are securely
maintained and identifiable. X
They shall be removed and
recycling or disposed following
internationally recognized best
practices like e.g. the FAO
Guidelines for the management
of small quantities of unwanted
and obsolete pesticides. (see
ISCC 202 2.7.2)
7.1.3 Is it ensured that surplus Check whether the producer is Confirmation by farmer/ employees, X V
9. application mix or tank aware of national or local farm records, reports of the further
washings are disposed of in legislation and that legislation is use of surplus application mix.
a way not to contaminate observed.
the ground water? When surplus application mix or
tank washings are applied onto
designated fallow land, it can be
demonstrated that this is legal
practice and all the treatments
have been recorded in the same
manner and detail as a normal
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
plant protection product
application.
Surface water contamination
has been avoided. (see ISCC
202 2.7.3)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that the re-use Check if empty plant protection Visual inspection of the farm/ V
0. of empty plant protection product containers have not plantation.
product containers for been or currently are not being Verification that the clear written
purposes other than re-used for anything other than instructions are available. Interview
containing and transporting containing and transporting of with responsible member of staff/
of the identical product is the identical product as stated workers
avoided? on the original label. If no official
X
disposal system exists and the
risk of false re-usage appears,
workers and adjacent
communities should be
educated on the risks of reusing
empty containers. (see ISCC 202
2.7.4)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that empty Check if a pressure-rinsing Inspection of the empty containers. V
1. plant protection product equipment for plant protection Clear written instructions. Interview
containers are cleaned prior product containers is installed with responsible member of staff/
to disposal? on the plant protection product workers
application machinery or if there
are clear written instructions to
rinse each container three times
prior to its disposal. Verify if it
can be ensured that the rinsate
from the empty plant protection
X
product containers is always put
back into the application
equipment tank when mixing.
Check if all the existent,
relevant national, regional and
local regulations and legislation
has been complied with
regarding the disposal of empty
containers. (see ISCC 202 2.7.5)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that the Check if national and regional Confirmation by local inspection of the X V
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
2. premises have adequate legislation is followed when production area and the waste-storage
provisions for waste storing and disposing wastes. areas. Interview with responsible
disposal? Check if the farm has member of staff/ workers. Visual
designated areas to store litter inspections of waste and disposal sites
and waste, which do not create
a safety or health hazard.
Verify if it can be ensured that
risks of different types of wastes
are identified and these wastes
are stored according to risk
identification.
This especially applies to
hazardous wastes. If applicable,
waste burning and disposal
should always be done by
official, authorized systems.
It not available, on-farm disposal
should follow best practices. The
following rules are regarded:
If waste is burned on-farm,
check if certain requirements
can be fulfilled:
 No burning of hazardous
wastes like solvents, certain
plastics or plant protection
products on-farm;
 PVC and certain other
plastics should not be
burned in on-farm
incinerators (especially in
open fires or low-
temperature incinerators);
 Incinerators and burning
sites are in legal locations
and fit for purpose.
If on-farm disposal takes
place, check if certain
requirements can be
fulfilled:
 Sanitary landfills on the
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
farm are designed according
to the requirements of
national legislation or where
not available – governed by
best practice guidelines
defined by farm
management;
 Litter and other general
waste are not thrown into
ditches, streamways or
holes that might flood;
 Disposals of burned wastes
are covered with a suitable
layer of soil.
(see ISCC 202 2.7.6)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that the Check if the system used to Visual inspection of the farm/ V
3. disposal of empty plant dispose of empty plant plantation. Confirmation by means of
protection product protection product containers the official collection system and
containers does occur in a ensures that people cannot confirmations of disposal.
manner that avoids come into physical contact with
exposure to humans and the empty containers.
the environment? The risk of contamination of the
X
environment, watercourses and
flora and fauna is minimized.
Where official collection and
disposal systems exist, there are
documented records of
participation by the producer.
(see ISCC 202 2.7.7)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that fertilizers Fertilizer storage reduces the Local inspection of the storage X V
4. are stored in an appropriate risk of contamination of humans facilities with regard to the distance to
manner? and the environment. All watercourses and high tide-areas,
inorganic fertilizers, e.g. health and safety of humans and the
powders, granules or liquids are environment.
stored in a manner, which poses
minimum risk of contamination
to water sources, health and
safety of humans and the
environment. E.g. stored liquid
fertilizer must be surrounded by
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
an impermeable barrier
(according to national and local
legislation, or is stored in a
container of at least 10% larger
capacity (if there is no
applicable legislation), and
consideration has been given to
the proximity to water courses
and flood risks. (see ISCC 202
2.8.1)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that inorganic The covered area is suitable to Reports on stored fertilizers, local V
5. fertilizers are stored in a protect all inorganic fertilizers, inspection of the storage facilities.
covered, clean and dry e.g. powders, granules or
area? liquids, from atmospheric
influences like sunlight, frost
and rain. Based on risk
assessment (fertilizer type,
weather conditions, temporary
storage), plastic coverage could
be acceptable. Inorganic
fertilizers, e.g. powders,
granules or liquids, are stored in
an area that is free from waste,
does not constitute a breeding
place for rodents, and where X
spillage and leakage is cleared
away. The storage area for all
inorganic fertilizers, e.g.
powders, granules or liquids, is
well ventilated and free from
rainwater or heavy
condensation. Storage directly
on the soil is not allowed. It is
possible to store gypsum and
lime (Calciumcarbonate, not
Calciumoxide or
Calciumhydroxide) in the field
for a limited time before
spreading. (see ISCC 202 2.8.2)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that plant Check if the plant protection Local inspection of the storage X V
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
6. protection products are product storage facilities comply facilities.
stored in accordance with with all the relevant current
local regulations in a national, regional and local
secure, appropriate legislation and regulations.
storage? Further verify whether the plant
protection product storage
facilities are kept secure under
lock and key. Potential
contamination of the ground
water must be avoided.
Appropriate storage facilities
should:
(1) Be structurally sound and
robust
(2) Have a sealed floor
(3) Built of materials or located
so as to protect against
temperature extremes
(4) Built of materials that are
fire resistant (Minimum
requirement RF 30, e.g. 30
minutes resistance to fire)
(5) Have sufficient and constant
ventilation of fresh air to avoid a
build up of harmful vapors
(6) Are located in areas with
sufficient illumination both by
natural and by artificial lighting,
to ensure that all product labels
can be read easily on the
shelves.
(7) Are located in a separate
space independent from any
other materials.
Check if all the plant protection
products that are currently in
the store are kept in the original
containers and packs. Check if
in the case of breakage the new
package contains all the
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
information of the original label.
(see ISCC 202 2.8.3)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that liquids are Verify whether all the plant Local inspection of the storage V
7. not stored on shelves above protection products that are facilities.
powders? liquid formulations are stored on
shelving, which is never above X
those products that are powder
or granular formulations. (see
ISCC 202 2.8.4)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that the Check if the stock inventory, Stock inventory. Document check and/ X V
8. product inventory is which indicates the contents or other evidence possible.
documented and readily (type and quantity) of the store
available? is available and is updated at
least every 3 months. Quantity
refers to how many bags,
bottles, etc., not on milligram or
centiliter basis. (see ISCC 202
2.8.5)
7.1.4 Is it ensured that mineral oil The storages of the material are Local inspection of the storage V
9. products are stored in an of suitable material and facilities
appropriate manner? consistent with best available
technology and respective laws.
Separated storage of fuels from X
fertilizer/PPP. Storage built in a
manner to prevent
contamination by the stored
materials. (see ISCC 202 2.8.6)
7.1.5 Is it ensured that existing Check, if irrigation took place Interview with the farmer, documents X V
0. water rights (both formal and what kind of irrigation regarding water rights, information
and customary) are source was used. If irrigation from local administrative authorities
respected and that water with other than rainwater took and NGO. If applicable water use plan
use is in compliance with place, check whether a permit available.
applicable regulations and of the responsible authority is
local legislations? Can the available. If groundwater is used
irrigation in the context of for irrigation, the producer holds
social and environmental an irrigation permit (official
sustainability be justified? license) or if not applicable,
assesses and evaluates use and
recharge rates of the
groundwater in a water use
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
plan. Check, if the producer
respects existing water rights
(including those of local
communities and indigenous
people), and can justify the
irrigation in light of accessibility
of water for human
consumption. Adverse effects
for downstream users must be
prevented. Water use is in
compliance with applicable
regulations and local legislation.
(see ISCC 202 2.9.1)
7.1.5 Is it ensured that good Verify whether good agricultural Documentation of water management X V
1. agricultural practices are practices/a management plan plan or good agricultural practices
applied to reduce exists with respect to Identified management measures
(unsustainable) water usage  Efficient water usage during implemented on a continuous basis.
and to maintain and irrigation; Check the irrigation water source and
improve water quality?  Responsible usage of whether it is used sustainably. Farmer
organic fertilizers and agro- can justify irrigation. Documentation
chemicals; on irrigation is available. If monitoring
 Waste discharge: takes place, results can be provided.
Verify whether appropriate Small-scale farmers in lower income
management measures to countries are at least able to explain
reducing the unsustainable potential impacts of their operations
water use, the abstraction of and how they avoid potential negative
unsustainable water sources impacts.
and to minimizing diffuse
and localized pollution from
chemical residues,
fertilizers, soil erosion or
other sources to ground and
surface water have been
identified. Appropriate
measures could include inter
alia:
 Setting up buffer zones
around water bodies,
 Efficient handling of
fertilizers including sewage
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
sludge, wastewater
treatment,
 Installing efficient irrigation
techniques (including
rainwater harvesting, drain
design) as well as timing the
irrigation appropriately to
crop requirements
Check, if irrigation took
place. If irrigation took
place, check whether
irrigation water was
abstracted from a
sustainable source or in a
way that recharge rates
compensates water
abstraction. Verify irrigation
method in light of water
conservation and local
climatic conditions.
Timing and amount of
irrigation is tailored to crop
requirements to meet
planned yield and quality
levels under local
conditions. Monitoring on
appropriate scale available.
(see ISCC 202 2.9.2)
7.1.5 Is a farm waste Check if a farm waste Verification of waste management X V
2. management plan management plan is available, plan.
available? which includes practices for Record keeping must be in place for
waste reduction, reuse and produced waste amounts and on-farm
recycling to avoid or reduce disposal (including discharge to
wastage and the use of landfill landfill, drains, sewers, surface water,
or burning. land or groundwater). If burning takes
The waste management plan place, further records on types of
should include the phases wastes burned and the type of burning
(1) Risk assessment, practice (e.g. open fire, low
(2) Target-setting, temperature incinerators) should be
(3) Risk management and available. Records of the risk
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
(4) Monitoring. assessment as well as appropriate
Verify whether best practices monitoring and management
have been addressed in the measures must be kept at least five
waste management plan. They years. A comprehensive, current,
refer to: documented plan that covers wastage
 Prevention of wastes; reduction, pollution and waste
 Prevention of on-farm recycling is available. Air, soil, water,
burning of certain waste noise and light contamination must be
materials; considered.
 Prevention of contamination
of on-site landfill disposal;
 Prevention of contamination
with respect to disposal of
ash;
It should be documented if
on-farm burning and landfill
disposal took place. An
assessment of risks to
humans (both workers and
neighbouring communities)
and environment should be
conducted in case burning
and disposal took place on-
farm. Appropriate
management measures
could be inter alia
minimization of waste
materials or energy
recovery or efficient burning
sites/incinerators. (see ISCC
202 2.10.1)
7.1.5 Have efforts been made to Check on-site sources of energy On-site verification on sources of X V
3. reduce fossil energy consumption. Check bills or energy, bills or other documents on
consumption and thus, also other appropriate documents for energy consumption and development
lower greenhouse gas energy consumption in the last in the past years.
emissions? years. Bilateral discussions on awareness on
Check whether there is/was that topic and efforts in past and
awareness and effort to reduce future on reductions of fossil energy
fossil energy consumption and if consumption.
there is awareness on impacts
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
of high fossil energy
consumption. (see ISCC 202
2.10.2)
7.1.5 Are records kept for training Staff, responsible for certain Record for training activities for V
4. activities and attendees? tasks within the company should workers including the topic covered,
participate in training activities. the trainer, the date and the
Training includes the following attendees. Evidence of attendance or
topics: details of other appropriate
 Handling of plant protection qualification.
products and other
hazardous chemicals
 Waste management
X
 Handling of protective
equipment for chemicals,
fuels, gas and electricity
Check if a record is kept for
training activities including the
topic covered, the trainer, the
date and attendees. (see ISCC
202 3.1.1)
7.1.5 Is it ensured that Check if all workers handling Records/Certificates/other X Unit IDSA memiliki V
5. certificates of competence and/ or administering chemicals, qualifications available. Document rencana dan realisasi
are available for dangerous disinfectants, plant protection check and/ or other evidence possible. program training pada
or complex work? products, biocides or other tahun 2017 yang
hazardous substances and all meliputi :
workers operating dangerous or - Pelatihan
complex equipment as defined penggunaan
in the risk assessment have Pestisida,
certificates of competence, and/ - Pelatihan P3K
or details of other appropriate - Pelatihan MSDS
qualifications. Check if records - Pelatihan IK
identify workers who carry out - Pelatihan
such tasks, and show pengelolaan dan
certificates of training or proof pemantauan
of competence. (see ISCC 202 lingkungan,
3.1.2) identifikasi aspek
lingkungan,
manajemen B3 dan
limbah B3
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
- Pelatihan terkait
regulasi, misal SIO
Operator, dll
Dan program
pelatihan tahun 2018.
7.1.5 Is it ensured that all workers Check if workers can Relevant documentation, Interview X a. Unit IDSA memiliki X
6. received adequate health demonstrate competency in with responsible member of staff/ program training
and safety training and responsibilities and tasks workers tahun 2017 beserta
have been instructed through visual observations. realisasi dan
according to the risk At least one worker/responsible dokumentasi
assessment? with first aid skills should be pelatihan untuk
available on the farm/plantation, setiap unit.
whenever cultivation activities Termasuk program
take place. training tahun 2018
If at time of inspection there are sudah tersedia.
no activities, there must be b. Unit IDSA
evidence of instructions. (see mendokumentasika
ISCC 202 3.1.3) n hasil training,
sertifikat training
karyawan dan
mengelola masa
berlaku sertifikat
training secara
terdata.
c. Unit IDSA
menjalankan
program Safety
Induction untuk
tamu dan
didokumentasikan
saat kegiatan
berlangsung dalam
bentuk daftar hadir
tanggal 22 Mei
2018.
Ketidaksesuaian :
Pada saat
pemeriksaan
dokumen, Unit
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
IDSA belum
mengidentifikasi
beberapa
kebutuhan training
pada Matriks
program training
seperti SIO
Operator K3 bidang
Tangki Timbun
7.1.5 Has the farm/plantation a The risk assessment should Complete and up to date risk X a. Unit IDSA memiliki X
7. written health, safety and include important health and assessment. Documents, visual dokumen ISBPR
hygiene policy and safety risks, such as the use of inspection of first aid kits and other tahun 2017 dengan
procedures including issues agrochemicals, liquid fuels, health, safety and hygiene measures, disertakan tindak
of the risk assessment? lubricants, machines, interview with farmer/plantation lanjut dan program
generators, boilers, pumps, manger and workers K3 yang relevan.
power tools, electrical Tersedia ISBPR
installations and power lines. tahun 2018 namun
Within the risk assessment, risks belum di evaluasi.
of transporting, storage, b. ISBPR perusahaan
handling and spillage and sudah
disposal shall be included. disosialisasikan
Check if the health, safety and pada tanggal 12
hygiene policy at least includes Januari 2018 dan di
the points identified in the risk bahas pada rapat
assessment. Policy measures P2K3 pada bulan
could include inter alia accident Januari 2018
and emergency procedures, c. Kebijakan K3 sudah
hygiene procedures, dealing dibuat di tetapkan
with any identified risks in the pada bulan
working situation. Check if the November 2013
policy are made clearly dan ditanda
understandable for all workers, tangani oleh Bpk.
reviewed and updated when the Daud Dharsono.
risk assessment changes. d. SOP K3 yang terbit
Check if regarding all tanggal 1 Juli 2014,
implemented health and safety Instruksi Kerja
requirements, a warning system terkait K3 dan
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
including legally permitted Form-form K3 pada
sanctions exists for workers who Buku Biru yang
do not apply the health- and sudah
safety requirements. didistribusikan ke
Check if complete and setiap Unit.
maintained first aid kits and e. Perusahaan
procedures (including records memasang
and evaluations of accidents) Kebijakan K3 dan
are available according to UU No. 1 tahun
national regulations and 1970 di dinding
recommendations and if they perusahaan
are accessible at all permanent sebagai bentuk
sites and available for transport komitmen dan agar
to the vicinity of the work. dibaca oleh pekerja
Check if it is ensured that first maupun tamu.
aid medical services can be f. Program K3 tahun
provided in case of 2017 sudah
emergencies. (see ISCC 202 diimplementasikan
3.2.1) dan dievaluasi
serta program K3
tahun 2018 yang
sudah diitetapkan
dan dijalankan
pada kurun waktu
kuartal 1. Program
K3 ini berjalan dan
dievaluasi pada
forum rapat P2K3
Ketidaksesuaian :
- Berdasarkan
pemeriksaan
dokumen,
Dokumen ISBPR
unit IDSA, belum
menunjukkan hasil
review maupun
revisi perbaikan
dari data
kecelakaan kerja
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
yang telah terjadi.
Dan dibuktikan
dalam
pemabahasan
rapat P2K3
mengenai review
maupun revisi
ISBPR. Hal ini tidak
sesuai dengan
SOP/SMART/HESS-
EHSD/SADV/I/002
ISBPR
7.1.5 Is it ensured that workers Check if workers (including Visual inspection: protective clothing is X Perusahaan sudah X
8. have suitable protective subcontractors) are equipped complete and clean and is used menerapkan
clothing? with suitable protective clothing according to requirements/ manajemen APD
in accordance with legal instructions. Cleaning instructions are sesuai
requirements and/or label available, Interview with SOP/SMART/HESS-
instructions or as authorized by farmer/plantation manger and workers EHSD/SADV/I/010
a competent authority. diantaranya adalah :
Check if complete sets of - Sudah dilakukan
protective clothing for certain sosialisasi SOP, IK,
works (e.g. handling plant APD, KTD dan P3K
protection products, working terkait K3 kepada
with electric equipment) which karyawan pada,28
enable label instructions and/or April 2018
legal requirements and/or - Sudah dilakukan
requirements as authorised by a inspeksi APD pada
competent authority to be bulan Maret 2018
complied with are available, - Terdapat dokumen
used and in a good state of serah terima APD
repair. baru dan
Examples of protective clothing penggantian APD
are rubber boots, waterproof rusak oleh asisten
clothing, protective overalls, dan sekertaris P2K3
rubber gloves and facemasks as - Saat dilakukan
well as appropriate respiratory, kunjungan ke
ear and eye protection devices. lapangan Divisi 1
They should be used where pekerja panen
necessary. sudah
Check if protective clothing is menggunakan APD
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
regularly cleaned, according to a sesuai ISBPR yaitu,
schedule adapted to the type of helm dengan
use and degree of soiling. faceshield dan
Cleaning of the protective sepatu boot. Alat
clothing and equipment should kerja panen yang
be done separately from private tajam diberi sarung
clothing washing; gloves should pelindung.
be washed before removal. - Pakaian kerja
Dirty, torn and damaged penyemprot divisi 1
protective clothing and dicuci di tempat
equipment as well as expired pencucian khusus
filter cartridges should be APD.
disposed of. Check if single-use - Asisten masing-
items (e.g. gloves, overalls) are masing unit
disposed of after one use. Check melakukan
if all the protective clothing and monitoring kondisi
equipment, including APD dan inspeksi
replacements filters, is stored in ketidakdisiplinan
a well-ventilated area and pemakaian APD
physically separate from the rutin setiap bulan
plant protection products and
any other chemicals, which Ketidaksesuaian :
might cause contamination of - Saat kunjungan
the clothing or equipment. (see dilapangan
ISCC 202 3.2.2) Pemanen di KUD
UM, KUD SR, KUD
SJT, KUD
Manunggal,KUD
Jaya Bersama tidak
menggunakan
Helm, Sepatu
Safety dan
Kacamata, dll
7.1.5 Is it ensured that potential Verify if permanent and legible Visual inspection of farm/ plantation X X
Unit IDSA telah
9. hazards are clearly signs indicate potential hazards,
menempatkan
identified by warning signs? e.g. waste pits, fuel tanks,
petunjuk bahaya dan
workshops, access doors of the
rambu-rambu K3 pada
plant protection product/
fertilizer/ any other chemical lokasi dan wadah
material berbahaya,
storage facilities as well as the
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
treated crop. Check if warning
misalnya :
signs have been placed where
appropriate. (see ISCC 202 - Di area kerja
3.2.3) kantor, gudang,
workshop dan lain-
lain sudah tersedia
Simbol B3, MSDS,
Rambu dan Amaran
pemakaian APD,
larangan masuk
selain petugas,
- Tersedia program
pemasangan
rambu K3
berdasarkan ISBPR
- Saat kunjungan ke
lapangan pada
proses
penyemprotan
terdapat amaran
larangn melintas
kawasan semprot,
alat pengendali
tumpahan berupa
terpal dan fasilitas
air bersih. MSDS
tersedia dan
penggunaan APD
oleh karyawan
7.1.6 Is it ensured that accident Check if an accident procedure On-site inspection, accident X X
a. Unit IDSA
0. procedure and equipment is displays the basic steps of procedures and equipment are
menyediakan
available? primary accident care and is available (might include e.g. clear
prosedur pelaporan
accessible by all individuals overview of responsibilities, contact
dan investigasi
within ten meters of the plant information in case of emergency,
kecelakaan kerja
protection product/ chemical availability of first aid material),
dengan nomor
storage facilities and designated interview with responsible member of
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
mixing areas. Check if staff/ workers
SOP/SMART/HESS-
procedures and equipment is
EHSD/SADV/1/005
available to deal with accidents
and spills of chemicals b. Unit IDSA
(including plant protection menyediakan
products, fertilizers and fuels). Sumber Daya
(see ISCC 202 3.2.4) Manusia pada Tim
Tanggap Darurat
yang disahkan
Disnaker dengan
nomor 137/IDSA-
Umum/09/2017
antara lain : Regu
Pemadam
(Kelompok APAR,
Hydrant/Tangki
Pemadam, Galah
pengait, Parang/
kampak, Pemukul
api, kep semprot
dan Kelompok
P3K ) yang sudah
mendapatkan
pelatihan P3K dan
APAR
c. Unit IDSA memiliki
daftar nomor
internal dan
ekternal tanggap
darurat yang bisa
dihubungi dan
dipasang di area-
area yang
strategis, misal
kantor, gudang,
workshop,
Ketidaksesuaian :
1. Ditemukan Kotak
P3K yang berada di
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
gudang dan
workshop IDSA
tidak terawat dan
tidak termonitoring
dengan baik. Isi
kotak P3K tidak
lengkap 21 item,
misalnya tidak
tersedia senter,
tidak tersedia
cairan cuci mata,
betadine sudah
kadaluarsa,.
2. D iarea gudang
banyak ditemukan
Kotak P3K yang
isinya tidak
lengkap, betadine
dan aquades
kadaluarsa,
7.1.6 Are facilities to deal with Check if all plant protection Visual inspection of facilities, Relevant X Perusahaan sudah V
1. accidental operator product/ chemical storage documentation on accident memiliki fasilitas dan
contamination available? facilities and all filling/mixing procedures gudang diantaranya
areas present on the farm have adalah :
eye wash capability, a source of - Tersedia Kotak P3K
clean water no more than 10 di berbagai unit
meters distant, a complete first bangunan,
aid kit and a clear accident - Dokumentasi,
procedure with emergency distribusi dan
contact telephone numbers or penempatan Kotak
basic steps of primary accident P3K sudah sesuai di
care, all permanently and berbagai area
clearly signed. (see ISCC 202 kerja, mandor
3.2.5) panen, workshop,
TPS LB3, Kantor
Divisi, Klinik,
- Tersedia kamar
mandi petugas
semprot,eyewasher
, shower alat
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
mandi, pencucian
APD, tempat
penyimpanan APD
semprot,
- Air dan Instalasi
pipa (kran) air
bersih untuk
Eyewasher,
Shower, dan
tempat mandi
tersedia dan
dilakukan
pengujian dalam
kondisi siap pakai.
- Tersedia
emergency shower
dan eyewasher
sesuai standar dan
kondisi saat diuji
sudah siap pakai
- Tersedia nomor
telpon dtanggap
darurat dan
diagram alur
keadaan darurat di
beberapa area
kerja misal,
Workshop Gudang,
Pondok, dengan
jelas.
- Tersedia secondary
containment dan
ruang khusus untuk
pencampuran
pestisida
7.1.6 Has a self-declaration on Check if the farm management Self-declaration is available in X V
2. good social practice and the employee’s appropriate language and complete
regarding human rights representative have signed and
been communicated to the displayed a self-declaration
employees and signed by assuring good social practice
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
the farm management and and human rights of all
the employees’ employees. Check if the self-
representative? declaration has been
communicated to the workers.
The self-declaration must be in
language appropriate to workers
and surrounding communities.
The declaration contains
commitment to the ILO core
labor standards, respect for
living wage, respect for the
social environment, respect for
legal land titles, sufficient
compensation for communities,
commitment to solve social
conflicts, fair contract farming
arrangements. (see ISCC 202
4.1.1)
7.1.6 Is it ensured that all Check if all environmental, Separate interview with X V
3. negative environmental, social, economic and cultural farmer/plantation manager and
social, economic and impacts for surrounding areas, employees’ representatives, if
cultural impacts are communities, users and land- necessary information from regional
avoided? owners are taken into account administration and NGOs.
and if local historical, cultural Report on impact assessment,
and spiritual properties and document check
sites are protected. Check if a
participatory social impact
assessment has been conducted
where all relevant stakeholders
including local communities and
indigenous people have been
engaged. The report is publicly
available in appropriate
language to surrounding
communities. On the basis of
that report an action plan to
address identified social impacts
and a continuing dialogue with
surrounding communities is in
place. Documents of regular
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
meetings with communities
(with two-way communication)
and local government with listed
risks and/or impacts and
evidence of negotiations or
resolution processes are
compiled. (see ISCC 202 4.1.2)
7.1.6 Is it ensured that biomass Verify whether biomass Separate interview with V
4. production does not impair production does not replace farmer/plantation manager and
food security? stable crops cultivated for food employees’ representatives. If
production and does not impair necessary information from NGOs.
X
the local food security. Local
food prices do not rise as a
direct effect of biomass
production. (see ISCC 202 4.1.3)
7.1.6 Is it ensured that fair and Check essential indicators: Applicable contract details are X V
5. transparent contract (1) The contracts are on paper available.
farming arrangements are in the appropriate language and
in place? co-signed copies are available
with both parties. In case of
cooperative contract
arrangements, all members
have a copy.
(2) Payments for harvest are, in
calculated form, done on paper
and signed and handed over to
contract farmer for his/her own
record keeping.
(3) Provisions governing price-
quality parameters are clearly
defined in the contract.
(4) The contract contains clear
provisions on exit arrangements,
buy-out possibilities, handing
over of property deeds (when
appropriate), and compensation
measures in case of bankruptcy
of the mother company when
legally required.
There are minutes of meetings
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
providing evidence of regular
discussions or negotiations
between Mother Company and
contract farmers'
representatives. (see ISCC 202
4.1.4)
7.1.6 Is it ensured that people on Check if all people on the Visual inspection of respective areas, V
6. the farm/plantation have farm/plantation have access to Interview with responsible member of
access to basic services? clean food storage areas, staff/ workers
designated dining areas, hand
washing facilities, safe drinking
water, hygienic toilet and hand-
washing facilities. Check if a
place to store food and to eat as
well as hand washing facilities
and potable drinking water are
available. Check if workers who
X
live on the farm/plantation are
provided with access to
appropriate cooking facilities
and clean and safe
accommodation. The living
quarters for the workers on farm
are habitable, have a sound
roof, windows and doors, and
have the basic services of
running water, toilets and
drains. (see ISCC 202 4.1.5)
7.1.6 Is it ensured that all All children at primary schooling List of all school-aged children, X V
7. children living on the farm age (according to national availability of schools, classrooms and
have access to quality legislation) living on the farm transport. Separate interview with
primary school education? have access to primary school farmer/plantation manager and
education, either through employees’ representatives.
provided transport to a public
primary school or through
adequate on-site schooling.
This is in accordance with the
International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights, Art. 13. (see ISCC 202
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
4.1.6)
7.1.6 Is it ensured that other Incentives including incentives Interviews with farmer/plantation V
8. forms of social benefits are for good working performance, manger as well as workers on special
offered by the employer to bonus payment, support of offers for employees and families.
employees, their families professional development,
and/or local community? family friendliness, medical
care/ health provisions,
improvement of social
surroundings etc. are offered.
The workers are encouraged to
get health insurance by creating
awareness and providing X
information about available
insurances. Health insurance
can include long-term
compensation in case of
disability and payment of
medical costs. If appropriate,
the employer makes
opportunities of employment
known locally. (see ISCC 202
4.1.7)
7.1.6 Is it ensured there is a Check if a complaint form and/or Complaint form is available. It shows V
9. complaint form and/or procedure is available for farm time of complaints, solution to
procedure available on the workers and surrounding complaint and time of the
farm, where employees and communities. Check if they have implementation of solutions. Separate
affected communities can been made aware of its interview with farmer/plantation
make a complaint? existence and complaints or manager and employees’
suggestions can be made at any representatives. X
time. Verify evidence that they
are dealt with in a timely
manner. Check if complaints and
their solutions from the last 24
months are documented and
accessible. (see ISCC 202 4.1.8)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that mediation A mediator is assigned by name Separate interview with X
0. is available in case of a and address by the elected farmer/plantation manager and
social conflict? person of trust. The mediator employees’ representatives.
should be independent from all
parties involved in the conflict
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
including the company or
operator commissioning the
mediation. (see ISCC 202 4.1.9)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that there is no Check if there has been no use Separate interview with V
1. forced labor at the farm or of forced, bonded or involuntary farmer/plantation manager and
plantation? labour as meant in ILO employees’ representatives
Convention 29 and 105.
Furthermore, check if employees
are not requested to lodge their
identity papers with the owner
or a third party. Retaining the
salary of workers, further X
property or additional grants or
illegal or excessive deduction of
fees from wages for disciplinary
purposes, personal protective
equipment, deposits for
accommodation, is prohibited,
unless permitted by law. (see
ISCC 202 4.2.1)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that there are Check if the minimum age Availability of respective X V
2. restrictions related to complies with all local and documentation. Separate interview
hazardous activities? national legislation as well as with responsible member of staff/
with ILO Convention 138 and workers and farmer/plantation
182 and if no minors are manager.
employed on the farm or
plantation. Check if documents
include recording of workers’
date of birth and documented
evidence that the employer is
aware of prevailing legislation.
Check if children within the age
of compulsory schooling are not
employed during school hours.
Check if young workers (15-18),
pregnant workers, disabled
workers or workers who suffer
from chronic or respiratory
diseases do not undertake
hazardous work that jeopardizes
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
their health, safety or morals.
Check if there area no forms of
slavery or practices similar to
slavery, forced or compulsory
labor of children. Verify if all
persons, who have been injured
or are ill, do not perform
activities that are detrimental to
their health and safety or that of
other workers. (see ISCC 202
4.2.2)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that there is no Check if there is no indication of Separate interview with V
3. indication of discrimination discrimination (distinction, farmer/plantation manger and
at the farm or plantation? exclusion or preference) employees’ representatives
practiced that denies or impairs Document check on equal
equality of opportunity, opportunities policy
conditions or treatment based
on individual characteristics and
group membership or
association. For example, on X
the basis of: race, caste,
nationality, religion, disability,
gender etc. Check if a publicly
available equal opportunities
policy including identification of
relevant/ affected groups in the
local environment is available.
(see ISCC 202 4.2.3)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that Check evidence that the farm Separate interview with V
4. employment conditions provides equality of opportunity farmer/plantation manager and
comply with equality and treatment regardless of employees’ representatives
principles? race, color, sex, religion,
political opinion, nationality, X
social origin or other
distinguishing characteristic (ILO
conventions 100 and 111). (see
ISCC 202 4.2.4)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that workers Check if the company is not Separate interview with X V
5. are treated with dignity and engaged in or tolerate the use farmer/plantation manager and
respect? of corporal punishment, mental employees’ representatives. Workers'
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
or physical coercion, or verbal interviews with self-
abuse or sexual harassment or selected/anonymous workers
any kind of intimidation of
workers. No harsh or inhumane
treatment is allowed. (see ISCC
202 4.2.5)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that all workers Check if all workers are provided Control of random samples of V
6. are provided with fair legal with fair legal contracts they do contracts. Separate interview with
contracts? understand. Copies of working farmer/plantation manager and
contracts can be shown for employees’ representatives.
every worker indicated in the
records. Both the worker as well
as the employer has signed
X
them. Check if records are kept
for at least 24 months. Where a
registration system exists,
copies of working contracts are
registered with the labor
authority of the country of
production. (see ISCC 202 4.2.6)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that the Check if employment conditions Random sample of documentation and X V
7. employment conditions of comply with legal regulations records. Random samples of pay slips
individual workers comply and/or collective bargaining match with working hours and wages.
with legal regulations agreements (e.g. on working Separate interview with
and/or collective bargaining hours, breaks, rest days, farmer/plantation manager and
agreements? overtime, deductions, sickness, employees’ representatives.
holiday entitlement, paid leave,
maternity leave, reasons for
dismissal, period of notice,
home work etc.).
Check if they are documented
and available in the languages
understood by workers or
explained carefully to them by
the manager or supervisor.
Check compliance for e.g.
working hours, breaks, rest
days, overtime, deductions,
sickness, holiday entitlement,
maternity leave, reasons for
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
dismissal, period of notice.
Documents also available in the
language understood by workers
or have been carefully explained
to them
Check further evidence on:
 Regular weekly working
hours do not exceed 48
hours. N/A for supervisors or
management.
 Rest breaks/days during
peak season
 Every six sequent days of
work at least one day off
should be provided to
workers
 Overtime is voluntary and
only occurs within a certain
time frame (e.g. during
harvest or planting) and is
compensated at a premium
rate. Workers area informed
about overtime work in a
timely manner
 Workers who take maternity
leave are entitled to return
to their employment at the
same terms and conditions
of prior employment. They
are not subject to any
discrimination, loss of
seniority or deduction of
wages
Conditions of employment
should follow negotiations
with trade unions or similar
organisations in case they
are available.
Check if wages and overtime
payment documented on the
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
pay slips are in line with legal
regulations (minimum wages)
and/or collective bargaining
agreements (if applicable). If
payment is calculated per unit,
workers (on average) shall be
able to gain the legal minimum
wage within regular working
hours. (see ISCC 202 4.2.7)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that the farm Check if the company’s pay slips Document check (e.g. pay slips) and/ V
8. pays a living wage, which demonstrate that living wages or other evidence possible.
meets at least legal or meet at least legal or industry
industry minimum minimum standards and are
standards? sufficient to meet basic needs of
X
personnel and to provide some
discretionary income. Check if
gross wages are paid at least
monthly to workers. (see ISCC
202 4.2.8)
7.1.7 Is it ensured that there is at Check if documentation is Documentation is available and V
9. least one worker or a available that demonstrates that complete. Separate interview with
workers' council elected a clearly identified, named farmer/plantation manager and
freely and democratically person of trust and/or a workers' employees’ representatives.
who represent the interests council representing the
of the workers to the interests of the workers to the
X
management? management is elected by all
workers and recognized by the
management. Check if this
person is able to communicate
complaints to the management.
(see ISCC 202 4.2.9)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that workers Check if all employees are free Separate interview with X V
0. can join or establish labour to establish and to join labour farmer/plantation manager and
organizations and collective organisations of their own employees’ representatives. Workers'
bargaining for negotiating choice or organize themselves interviews with self-
working conditions? to perform collective bargaining. selected/anonymous workers.
Check if it is ensured that
workers have the right to
organize and negotiate their
working conditions. Check if
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
there is evidence that the
employer supports the
establishment or at least does
not block the effective
functioning of worker-
committees where the workers
elect representatives.. Check if
collective bargaining
agreements are accepted. Verify
if trade union members are
guaranteed the possibility to
fulfill their tasks at least outside
of the regular working hours.
The employment conditions
regarding freedom of
association and collective
bargaining are in accordance
with all national and local
legislation and ILO Conventions
87 and 98. (see ISCC 202
4.2.10)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that there are Check if the responsible person Separate interview with V
1. responsible persons for and the elected person of trust farmer/plantation manager and person
workers' health, safety and demonstrate awareness and/or responsible for workers’ health, safety
good social practice? access to national regulations and good social practice.
concerning: Gross and minimum
wages, working hours, union
membership, anti-
X
discrimination, child labor, labor
contracts, holiday and maternity
leave, health and medical care
coverage and pension/gratuity
and regular two way
communication. (see ISCC 202
4.2.11)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that there is an Check if the management holds Separate interview with X V
2. open communication of regular two-way communication farmer/plantation manager and
management with workers? meetings with their employees employees’ representatives. Reports
where issues affecting the on the meetings
business or related to worker
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
health, safety and welfare can
be discussed openly. At least
two meetings a year are held
between management and
employees. Matters related to
the business and worker health,
safety or welfare can be
discussed without fear,
intimidation or retribution.
Records from such meetings are
kept and the concerns of the
employees are recorded. (see
ISCC 202 4.2.12)
7.1.8 Are records on all workers Check if records demonstrate an Availability of respective V
3. and employees available? accurate overview of all documentation. Separate interview
employees (including seasonal with farmer/plantation manager and
workers and subcontracted employees’ representatives.
workers on the farm) and
indicate full names, a job X
description, date of birth, date
of entry, wage and the period of
employment. Check if records
are accessible for the last 24
months. (see ISCC 202 4.2.13)
7.1.8 Is a time recording system Check if a time recording Random sample of documents on V
4. that shows daily working system is available that makes working hours. Separate interview
time and overtime on a working hours and overtime of with farmer/plantation manager and
daily basis for all workers workers and employees employees’ representatives.
X
available? transparent. Working times of all
employees during the last 24
months are documented. (see
ISCC 202 4.2.14)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that the Documents show legal Respective contracts are available, X V
5. producer can prove that the ownership or lease, history of land register, if necessary information
land is used legitimately land tenure and the actual legal by regional administration and NGOs.
and that traditional land use of the land. The producer
rights have been secured? must identify existing land
rights and does respect them
(see Principle 1).
The rights of indigenous people
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
are respected.
Document check and/ or other
evidence possible. (see ISCC
202 5.1)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that there is The producer can demonstrate Separate interview with X V
6. awareness of, and awareness of his responsibilities farmer/plantation manager and
compliance with, all according to the applicable laws. employees’ representatives. Relevant
applicable regional and Applicable laws are being documentation available.
national laws and ratified complied with. They apply to:
international treaties? (1) National and international
protected areas as referred to in
Principle 1
(2) Environmental impact
assessment
(3) Soil conservation and
management, soil fertility
(relating to e.g. application of
fertilizers, manure and Plant
Protection Products,
contamination and accumulation
of hazardous substances in
soils)
(4) Handling of fertilizers and
Plant Protection Products
(5) Water conservation and
management (relating to e.g.
abstraction, use and discharge
of irrigation water, protection of
water bodies)
(6) Energy use and related
emissions
(7) Reuse, recycling and
disposal of hazardous and non-
hazardous wastes
(8) Health and safety and
rights of workers
(9) Rights of permanent and
temporary workers (e.g.
overtime work, paid holiday-,
sick- and parental leave)
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
(10) Rights of local communities
and indigenous groups.
The company should be familiar
with the relevant legislation and
should remain informed on
changes in legislation. (see ISCC
202 5.2)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that basic Records shall be kept with Relevant documentation available V
7. economic documentations respect to yields, costs, income
X
are available? and profitability of the farm or
plantation. (see ISCC 202 6.1.1)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that a business Farms or plantations (single Business plan available V
8. plan is available? farms, or groups) have Small-scale farmers in lower income
developed and are countries should at least be able to
implementing a business plan. It explain verbally how their activities
includes plans and activities to contribute to the long-term economic
support long-term economic viability of their farm.
viability of the farm or
plantation. It shall take into
account social and X
environmental principles, e.g.
the sustainable optimization of
yield and input efficiency.
Market requirements as well as
risk mitigation strategies (e.g. of
drought, price fluctuations) can
also be included. (see ISCC 202
6.1.2)
7.1.8 Is it ensured that the Check if best timing for crop Bilateral discussions with both V
9. farm/plantation has a good deliveries is discussed with farmers/plantation managers and
relationship with its customers to ensure good prices recipients (first gathering points) X
customer? and to maintain quality. (see
ISCC 202 6.1.3)
7.1.9 Is it ensured that a Check if a recording system is Production reports X V
0. recording system is established for each unit of
established for each unit of production. These records must
production? be kept in an ordered and up-to-
date condition for at least 3
years. Current records must
provide a history of biomass
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
production of all production
areas. (see ISCC 202 6.2.1)
7.1.9 Does a commitment of Verify that the management Management reports, discussion with V
1. continuous improvement regularly monitors and reviews farmers/plantation managers and
exist for each unit of all activities and takes actions to employees
production? continuously improve the
management with respect to an
environmental, social and
economic sustainable
development. Continuous
improvement can include (but is
X
not limited to) a reduction of
application, a more efficient
fertiliser management, waste
reductions, energy consumption
and greenhouse gas emissions,
social impacts and yield
performance. (see ISCC 202
6.2.2)
7.1.9 Is it ensured that records Documentation system complies Documentation system available X V
2. are kept for the description with at least the following
of the areas in use? requirements:
(1) The description of the whole
agricultural area is carried out
along a list of parameters to be
assessed:
a. Lot number
b. Lot size
c. Type of crop
(2) Each lot (as part of the
whole agricultural area) is
depicted as traverse in
geographic coordinates with a
precision of 20 meters for each
measuring point.
a. The depiction of simple lot
shapes can easily be realized
with the help of satellite images.
b. For very complex shapes,
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
the real lot can be approximated
by a polygon. The measuring
points on each end of the lines
framing the polygon then have
to meet the required precision of
20 meters.
c. A small number of
measuring points may suffice for
the approximation through a
polygon as long as the lot size
on the map does not deviate
from the specification in (1) by
more than 10%.
d. If suitable maps or tables
specifying the requested
information do not exist, it is
permitted to identify lots with
the help of tools like Google
Earth. The measuring points can
be set in the image as place
marks manually and the tool for
documentation shall deliver the
results (geo-coordinates) for
these place marks.
Reports on all implemented
management measures as well
as records and verification
documents on fulfilled criteria,
where such a reporting is
required. (see ISCC 202 6.2.3)
7.1.9 Is it ensured that in case of Relevant subcontractors are Contracts with subcontractors and all X V
3. the engagement of enterprises that work on behalf relevant documents are available
subcontractors they must of the producer (e.g. seeding, Documentation is available with
comply fully with the ISCC fertilizing, pest control, producer.
standard and provide the harvesting).
respective documentation Relevant subcontractors must
and information? be regarded in the audit. The
producer must provide evidence
of respective contracts with the
subcontractor ensuring that the
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
auditor gets access to relevant
information. The producer must
also accept that ISCC recognized
auditors are allowed to verify
the assessments through a
physical inspection where there
is doubt.
The producer is responsible for
observance of the control points
applicable to the tasks
performed by the subcontractor
by checking and signing the
assessment of the subcontractor
for each task and season
contracted. (see ISCC 202 6.2.4)
7.2. Farms/ Plantation Template No. 2: Traceability (relevant for main and sample
audits)
7.2.1. Are contracts available with Check contracts for reliability Contracts are available. V
all First Gathering Points to and completeness.
X
which sustainable biomass
will be or was delivered?
7.2.2. Is the copy of the signed Check self-declaration for Copy of signed self-declaration is V
self-declaration available signature and reliability available
X
(only relevant for sample
audits)?
7.2.3. Are weighbridge protocols Check weighbridge protocols, Protocols are available. V
of delivered biomass for look up requirements according
each truck/tractor as to ISCC System Basic 203.
received from First X
Gathering Points (according
to ISCC System Document
203) available?
7.2.4. If subcontractors are used If there are subcontractors Contracts are available and V
(e.g. for spraying, check contracts for reliability subcontractors were positively
harvesting, etc.), are and completeness. Additionally, checked
contracts available? subcontractors have to be
X
checked.
If no subcontractors are being
used conformity shall be marked
with “yes”.
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
7.2.5. Can the status as Cross Check validity of copies of CC Documents are available V
Compliance (CC)-farmer be application form. If farm
proven by valid copies of operates outside the EU or in a
the CC application form EU country, which does not
X
(only relevant for farms in follow Cross Compliance
the EU)? regulation (i.e. Bulgaria,
Romania) conformity shall be
marked with “yes”.
7.2.6. Plausibility check: Is the Verify the amount of crops Reports on outgoing material, delivery V
amount of crops delivered delivered as sustainable with notes, field records etc.
as sustainable consistent the respective crop areas and X
with the size of the crop yield per year.
area and yield per year?
7.2.7. Do the delivery notes or Verify whether the documents Delivery notes, weighbridge tickets, X V
sustainability declarations contain the following sustainability declarations, proofs of
for outgoing sustainable information: sustainability for outgoing sustainable
material comply with the  Name and address of the material, reporting system
ISCC requirements? Is the supplier
information consistent with  Name and address of the
information in the reporting recipient
system? Only relevant for  Related contract number
individual certifications  Date of physical dispatch of
the sustainable material
 Name of the certification
system and certificate
number of the certified
supplier
 Unique number of
sustainability declaration
(running number)
 Type of outgoing sustainable
material (waste or residues)
 Country of origin of the raw
material (in case of
agricultural cope residues
the country where the
agricultural cope residue s
originated from)
 Statement that the
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
sustainability criteria
according to Art. 17 (3) to
(6) RED were not taken into
account (applicable to waste
and residues other than
agricultural, aquaculture,
fisheries and forestry
residues)
 Statement if material is
“ISCC Compliant” (if
relevant)
 Quantity of outgoing
sustainable material (in
metric tons or m3 at 15°C)
referring to dry material or
indicating moisture content
 One of the three options of
GHG emission information:
o Option 1: Statement ”Use
of total default value” (if
an applicable default
value from the RED is
available).
o Option 2: Statement “Use
of disaggregated default
value for eec”(if an
applicable default value
from the RED is available).
o Option 3: Statement of
actual GHG values or
NUTS2 value in kg CO2eq
per dry-ton of product.
Separate statement of
GHG values for:
cultivation emissions (eec)
and where applicable land
use change (el) and/or
improved agricultural
management (esca)
7.3. Farms/ Plantation Template No. 3: Greenhouse Gas Emissions (relevant for main
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
and sample audits)
7.3.1. Option 1 and 2: In case Verify whether the farmer fits Documentation GHG value, region of V
farmer applied the total into the category from which the cultivation. Compare with the RED
default value or default value was chosen and if values
disaggregated default value default value fulfills the required
for cultivation (eec) GHG emission savings. Is a X
Application of the total and default value available for the
disaggregated default value respective raw material? Does
is in line with the RED and the total default value achieve
ISCC requirements. the minimum GHG savings?
7.3.2. Option 3 NUTS2 value: In Verify the location of agricultural Documentation of cultivation location V
case farmer applies NUTS2 production and whether the and GHG value. Compare with NUTS2
values (only applicable for correct NUTS2 value for that table “Values reported to the
agricultural production of location or the highest NUTS2 Commission by the Member States
raw material in EU: Is the value for the whole Member implementing Article 19 (2) RED“, and
application of the NUTS2 State has been used (to be identify Member State and respective
value in line with the RED applied at the farm, first NUTS2 value, which is applicable for
and ISCC requirements? gathering point or central raw material. Values reported in red in
office). the table are in dry-ton.
Verify that in case of use of
X
NUTS2 value, the correct
emissions value in kgCO2eq/dry-
ton is selected from the NUTS2
table published by the European
Commission on the
transparency platform (values
stated in red colour) or, if a
value was published in another
unit, a correct recalculation took
place.
7.3.3. Option 3 (Actual value): In Verify the time frame, for which X V
case actual GHG values all data have been gathered and
have been calculated, is the GHG calculation has been
individual calculation of conducted. Please note that
GHG emissions of GHG calculation and respective
cultivation up to date? data shall be up to date and
must be based on previous
Note: Please indicate in cultivation period/ previous
“Findings” for which period calendar or financial year. In
the GHG calculation has case of group certification, the
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
been conducted. calculation shall preferably be
hold at the central office or the
first gathering point for a pre-
verification of the calculation
methodology.
7.3.4. Emissions of cultivation Verify if the following data have Reports on incoming and outgoing X V
(eec): been collected on-site and have material, field records, delivery notes,
Has the data basis for GHG been correctly applied; flow meters, invoices, documentation
calculation of cultivation verification of data plausibility; on fertilization etc.
been determined correctly verification whether further
for the calculation period? inputs and outputs do exist:
 Calculation period
Have the GHG emissions of  Amount and type of raw - Documentation of information,
the cultivation been material (yield per hectare sources and publication date as far as
calculated correctly? and year; if drying takes the data is from literature sources.
place mass of dried main
Do the emission factors product
from databases and  Amount of seeds in kg per - Transparent documentation of
literature comply with the ha and year sources, method of analysis, official
ISCC requirements?  Amount of mineral statements of laboratory and year of
fertilizers: P2O5-, K2O-, analysis if individual determined data
CaO- and N-fertilizer in kg is used.
nutrient per ha and year Transparent documentation of
(e.g. kg N/(ha*yr)) calculation, formulas, all input data
 Amount of organic N and results.
fertilizers in kg N/(ha*yr)
 Amount of crop residues in - For N2O-Field emissions: “Annotated
kg N/(ha*yr) example of a GHG calculation using
the EU RED methodology”
 Amount and type of used
pesticides in kg active
ingredient per hectare and
For emission factors the following
year
sources can be used:
 Diesel consumption per year
and hectare  Standard Values for Emission
 Electricity consumption Factors as available on European
(kWh per hectare and year) Commission Transparency Platform
and source of electricity for Biofuels.
 Moisture content per ton  ISCC System Document 205
delivered raw material in  Alternative sources. The use of
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
alternative values must be duly
percentage justified. In case alternative values
Emission factors for seed in are chosen, this must be flagged
kgCO2e/kg seed up in the documentation of the
Emission factors for mineral calculations in order to facilitate
fertilizers reflecting the the verification by auditors. In
emissions of producing,
case of individual calculation of
extracting and processing of
emission factors: Calculation
the fertilizers in kg CO2e/kg
nutrient (to be applied for
P2O5-, K2O-, CaO- and
mineral N-fertilizer; for N-
fertilizer referred to as
EFproduction, for other fertilizers
referred to as EF)
 Emission factor for field
emissions of all N-fertilizers
including mineral and
organic N-fertilizer and crop
residues in kg CO2e/kg N
(EFfield)
 Emission factors for
pesticides in kgCO2e/kg
active ingredient
 Emission factors for diesel,
electricity or other energy
source
Data shall be based on ISCC 205
or other official sources (e.g.
Biograce, Ecoinvent, etc.) if
available. If not available it shall
be based on other literature
sources. If no literature available
at all: laboratory analysis or
individual calculation might be
possible if methodology
complies with RED methodology
and is verifiable. In this case,
duly justification and flagging in
documentation required.
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
Verify whether the calculation of
GHG emissions was conducted
according to the methodology of
ISCC 205 taking into account all
relevant inputs.
Consider especially if for N-

fertilizers (mineral and organic)
and crop residues the N2O-field
emission have been included in
the calculation.
7.3.5. Were net GHG emissions The calculation of GHG Transparent documentation of the V
from land use change (el) emissions from land use change calculation and documentation of
calculated according to the took place according to the results and of input data.
respective formula (see respective formula and all
ISCC 205)? Are all inputs for relevant inputs have been taken
the single factors of the into account, in particular:
formula documented and  Carbon stock of reference
verifiable? Are all inputs and area per hectare X
results available in the  Carbon stock of cultivation
required units? area per hectare
 Yield per hectare and year
Note: Please indicate in
“Findings” if any land use
change (not violating ISCC
Principle 1) took place.
7.3.6. Calculation of emission Were only the following Production records X V
savings from improved measures integrated:
agricultural management  Shifting to reduced or zero-
(esca) tillage;
 Improved crop rotations Transparent documentation of the
and/or cover crops, calculation and documentation of
including crop residue results and of input data.
management;
 Improved fertilizer or
manure management;
 Use of soil improver (e.g.
compost).
Was the correct emission
formula applied for calculating
Majo Mino Yes No
r r
Must Must
emission savings from improved
agricultural management?
7.3.7. Has the correct value been GHG value passed to recipient Delivery notes, sustainability X V
passed to the recipient of included all relevant emissions. declarations to the recipient, internal
the raw material in the last Verify whether the correct value reporting
year? was provided in kg CO2e/ dry-ton
of raw material on the For the calculation of kg CO2eq
sustainability declaration. emissions per ton of dry product
through moisture content, refer to
ISCC system document 205
ISCC EU Audit Procedure Farm/ Plantation Chapter No. 6: Best Practices, Non-conformities and measures
Voluntary Improvement Measures and Best Practices

Fully
No. of Voluntary Improvement Partially Not (yet)
No. Finding Implement
Requirements Measure Implemented Implemented
ed
Tersedia bukti sosialisasi SOP Keluhan untuk Tahun
1 7.1.69 2016, namun bukti sosialisasi untuk Tahun 2017
belum dapat ditunjukan.
Saat dilakukan wawancara, masih terdapat
2 7.1.62 karyawan yang belum memahami isi PKB, dan
dokumentasi sosialisasi PKB belum tersedia
Remarks, observations of best practices and suggestions for
voluntary improvement
(Voluntary information, will also be included in the Summary Audit

Report)
Mandatory Improvement Measures

Implementation Measure
of Mandatory implemente
No No. of
Non-Conformity/ Finding Action/Measure Measure until d
. Requirements
when (within 40
No Yes
days)
1
5
6
Mandatory Improvement Measures
Implementation Measure
No No. of of Mandatory implemente
Non-Conformity/ Finding Action/Measure
. Requirements Measure until d
when (within 40 No Yes
days)
Sucipto K
Place, Date, Signature Auditor Place, Date, Signature GHG auditor/ expert Place, Date, Signature Client
(in case of individual calculation) (By signing the client also confirms that the
ISCC terms of use are accepted)

ISCC - EU - Procedure - Farm - Plantation - v3.2 IDSA - K3

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

ISCC - EU - Procedure - Farm - Plantation - v3.2 IDSA - K3

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

ISCC EU Audit Procedures for Farm/ Plantation

0.7. Farm/ Plantation Information

0.7.1 Agricultural production areas

(a) would cease to be grassland

Consider especially if for N-

Voluntary Improvement Measures and Best Practices

(Voluntary information, will also be included in the Summary Audit

Mandatory Improvement Measures

Вам также может понравиться