Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Evaluating the effects of wrist splinting in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome
University of Utah
WS FOR CTS
1
Introduction
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a condition where the median nerve is compressed or
inflamed and causes numbness, tingling, and other symptoms in the arm and hand (Mayo clinic,
2017). Irritated tendons or a thickening of the lining of the tunnel itself can cause compression.
Certain underlying medical conditions can also cause swelling in the wrist including diabetes,
thyroid problems, high blood pressure, arthritis or previous trauma to the wrist (Hall, 2013).
Women are three times more likely than men to develop CTS, probably due to the fact that the
actual carpal tunnel structure in the wrist is smaller in women than it is in men (“Carpal Tunnel
Syndrome Fact Sheet,” 2017). Carpal tunnel syndrome affects 2.7 to 5.8 percent of the adult
population. This diagnosis is often associated with overuse injuries that can be repetitive in
nature (Cestia, 2011) such as typing, repeated exposure to vibration (such as power tools) or
Carpal tunnel syndrome ranges in cost for those affected by it. In terms of non-surgical
treatments, things like splints, braces, medication and therapy can vary in cost. In more severe
cases, surgery can cost someone between $1,500 and $12,000 depending on insurance
coverage (“What is the cost of surgery,” n.d.). Additionally, the pain from CTS can interfere with
work, school or home responsibilities and prevent those people from participating in certain
activities. Symptoms may interfere at work, which could lead to decreased productivity and
potentially unemployment. Carpal tunnel syndrome can have a significant impact on a person’s
quality of life. Pain or muscle weakness may prevent someone from doing important everyday
occupations and activities. This can lead to depression or low self-esteem (“Can carpal tunnel
syndrome cause anxiety and depression,” 2017). Though CTS may seem like it is localized to
the wrist and arm, it can have widespread effects on many parts of a person’s life.
With proper treatment, people with CTS can reduce their symptoms and live more
normal lives. As occupational therapist, we will be able to assess people with carpal tunnel
WS FOR CTS
2
adaptive equipment in order to improve their quality of life and increase their engagement in
occupations. A person’s hands and wrists are important for many of the occupations and
activities that people chose to do, so it is an occupational therapist's job to help maximize
Current therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome can range from non-surgical techniques like
splinting, medication, and exercise to surgery for more severe cases. Most patients are treated
non-surgically (Verdugo, Salinas, Castillo, & Cea, 2003). Piazzini et al. (2007) conducted a
systematic review that looked at the effectiveness of the current conservative therapy
treatments. They evaluated different treatments including local injections, splints, physical
therapies, and therapeutic exercises and found various levels of evidence that correlated with
each treatment. Among the evidence that was presented in this systematic review, there was
level 2 evidence that showed that splints were an effective treatment, especially if they are used
full time. We chose to focus our attention on splinting because it is one of the most common
forms of conservative treatment for CTS. As noted by Piazzini et al. (2007), there is a hole gap
in our knowledge about the effectiveness of some of these conservative treatments like
treatment on its own or if additional treatments were required to reduce pain in individuals with
For this systematic review, online databases were searched for studies that utilized CTS
and pain management. The databases used were Medline, Cochrane Database, Google
Scholar, CINAHL Database, and PubMed. The University of Utah’s Eccles Library was also
used. Keywords used included carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS, splinting, pain and splint. These
keywords were not all used at once, but in various combinations to achieve accurate and broad
WS FOR CTS
3
searches. We searched for articles that compared splinting in carpal tunnel for pain to another
techniques, and splinting plus other treatment such as steroid injections or education. Overall,
there were a combined 643 articles available to review based on our keyterms using the key
terms listed earlier in this section. This large number of articles can be attributed to the
prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome as well as the large amount of research that has been
done on the effectiveness of splinting as a form of therapy. We found articles about CTS back to
Each of us originally found, read, and reviewed five articles each for a total of 15 articles.
The selection criteria used to find articles was that they were recently published and had high Commented [AT3]: meaning?
levels of evidence, including criteria such as a control and/or a study group. We ended up with a
handful of systematic reviews and RCTs. Then those articles were analyzed for our final review.
For our final review, some articles were omitted due to being more irrelevant and not
addressing pain, for having lower PeDRO scores, low validity, or for overlapping with other
articles. We settled on using nine different articles for this review. We wanted articles that had
no lower than a 5 on the PeDRO scale. We wanted to keep high levels of evidence so all of our
articles are either randomized clinical trials or systematic reviews. We also wanted articles that
took various perspectives on CTS treatment for pain. To keep up with leading research, articles
between 2003 and 2017 were exclusively used in this review. Commented [AT4]: ok here it is. Probably would have
been better to organize it so it is closer to the earlier
statement
Study size and quality: Commented [AT6]: should make these AP style
headings
For this evidence- based review, there were nine articles included. Eight of the nine
articles were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The ninth article used was a systematic
review. Six of the RCTs used a two group design (Gerritsen, 2003; Angelis et al., 2009; Yagci et Commented [AT7]: write out
a four group design (Brininger et al., 2007), and one used a three group design (Dincer et al., Commented [AT9]: write out
2009). The range of the sample sizes in the RCT”s was from 33 to 176. The mean sample size
was 76. The sample size for the systematic review was 1,190. All of the articles qualified as
level 1 evidence. The PeDRO scores for the articles ranged from 5/10 to 8/10 with a PeDRO
Brininger et al. (2007) examined the efficacy of customized splints and tendon nerve
gliding exercises used to treat CTS in a randomized control trial. This study looked at
conservative interventions like splinting for mild to moderate CTS in regards to overall
symptoms, though pain was not specifically mentioned. Limitations in this study included the
improvement resulted solely from the intervention process. The main outcome validated the use
of splints for conservative CTS treatments and further mentioned certain types of splints were
Angelis, Pierfelice, Giovanni, Staniscia, and Uncini (2009) examined the efficacy of a Commented [AT11]: since you mentioned Angelis
earlier, you’d be able to just write Angelis et al. (2009)
wrist splint versus a soft hand brace for CTS treatment. This study specifically mentioned the
measurement of pain and paresis so it was important to include this article because it directly
related to our research question. There were no limitations mentioned by the authors of this
article, but the study population was predominantly female which could have had an impact on
the overall outcome. The outcomes of this study show that both hand braces and wrist splints
show a reduction in symptoms, specifically the pain scores were significantly reduced post
treatment.
Yagci et al. (2009) looked to compare the short-term efficacy of splinting alone versus
splinting with low-level laser therapy to treat carpal tunnel. This study showed that splinting is an
effective treatment but splinting with another form of therapy (low-level laser therapy in this
WS FOR CTS
5
case) is a more beneficial treatment. This study noted many limitations including a lower
baseline symptom severity for the group that received the laser therapy. This could not have
been predicted before the study due to the randomization of assignment to groups, but both
treatments were proven to show symptomatic improvement. Another limitation of this study was
the sample size. The sample was large enough to use the specific assessments and
questionnaires that the authors chose but may have been limited to statistical comparison of
treatment.
splinting as a conservative treatment for CTS to splinting in conjunction with steroid injections.
This study used both clinical measures and client questionnaires to measure the treatment
effectiveness. The results of this study show that only conservative treatment is not as effective
as splinting with steroid injections. In both nerve conduction and client questionnaires, the
steroid injection group scored higher. This study noted some limitations including the low
amount of participants (N=43), limited age range (51-52 years), and the large participation of
women.
Page, Massy-Westropp, O'Connor, and Pitt (2012) is a systematic review that looked at
19 articles regarding CTS treatment. This review noted that most of the studies used different
outcome measures, but the majority of them dealt with a reduction of symptoms either
measured or via questionnaire. This systematic review concluded that there is evidence that
splinting is more effective than no treatment. Limitations of this review are limited evidence and
Gerritsen (2003) is conducted a RCT that compared wrist splinting at night for six weeks
to open carpal tunnel release surgery. They measured effectiveness by how many times
participants woke up during the night due to pain and client questionnaires at specified times
during the study. This study concluded that while more invasive, the open carpal tunnel release
surgery showed more reduced pain and symptoms. Noted limitations of this study are the lack
WS FOR CTS
6
of clinical or physiological measurement of pain or symptoms. Instead, this study was based
Dincer, Cakar, Kiralp, Kilac, and Dursun (2009) looked at the effectiveness of splinting
coupled with other treatments in treating symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. The treatments
that were compared were splinting alone, splinting with low-level laser (Lll) therapy, and
splinting with ultrasound (US) therapy. This study found that all of the interventions were
effective at relieving symptoms, but splinting coupled with Lll therapy was the most effective
treatment, followed by splinting with US therapy, and lastly splinting alone. The authors state a
few limitations for this study. One was the short duration of the follow-up. This could have
affected the overall outcome of the study. Another limitation noted is that it was impossible for
Hall et al. (2013) compared full-time wrist splinting alone with full-time wrist splinting.
Splinting combined with an education program. The study found that 8 week full-time splinting
with an education program was more effective at relieving symptoms including pain, than the
control group of full-time splinting alone. A limitation of this study is that the results could not
occupational therapists of different skill levels and the difference in skill could have had an
impact on the amount of symptom improvement. The study also had a smaller sample size, but
the article stated that the size was determined by previous studies to be sufficient.
Bulut et al. (2015) looked at the effectiveness of wrist splinting alone compared with the
wrist splinting combined with metacarpophalangeal joint splints. The results of this study show
that a splint that prevents MCP joints from flexing combined with a wrist splint is more effective
than a wrist splint that restricts wrist movements alone. A limitation noted by the authors is that
there is a large variety of MCP splints and wrist splints and how much movement is restricted by
each of them may have influenced the results. More studies need to be conducted on these
WS FOR CTS
7
variations to be able to better support the findings of this study. Commented [AT12]: great job on your results!
The general population in our studies was female with an age range of 50-55 years old.
The participants had mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome and were seeking conservative
treatments for their symptoms. We were able to find nine different articles related to our
question. Seven of the articles were specific to our question regarding pain symptoms. Four of
the nine studies found compared splinting alone versus splinting combined with another
treatment. One study compared splinting at night with surgery and two studies compared
treatment using different kinds of splints. The systematic review looked at 19 studies that
The findings of the articles show that wrist splinting is an effective conservative
treatment for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in reducing pain. This may be one of the
reasons that wrist splinting alone was used a control group against other treatments. Although
splinting is effective, four of our studies that compared splinting alone with splinting combined
with another treatment (Yagci et al., 2009; Hall et al., 2013; Khosrawi, Emadi, & Mahmoodian,
2016; Bulut et al., 2015) found that splinting combined with another treatment was generally
more effective than splinting alone. Furthermore, these studies show that customized splints
may be more effective than off the shelf splints. Overall findings show that splinting significantly
A common limitation mentioned throughout these articles is that the participant number
was sufficient to run the trials but was still considered small sample sizes. The studies selected
for our review also mentioned having a limited age range, with the mean age being between 50-
55 years old. An additional limitation in these articles was that there were much higher numbers
of women used as participants than men. Khosrawi, Emadi and Mahmoodian (2016) specifically
WS FOR CTS
8
mentioned the higher number of women selected for their study than men. Though the general
population shows that women are more likely to develop CTS than men, this is still considered a
limitation because the information may not be generalizable to men with carpal tunnel
syndrome.
According to the American Heart Association, splinting would be considered between the
levels of A and B and a class IIa benefit (AHA levels of evidence, 2010). We classified our
research as IIa and between A and B because of the limited population in our articles and the
multiple RCTs we found that were positively correlated with our research question. This is a
reasonable treatment to use for CTS to address pain. Based on the articles researched,
to note that there was conflicting evidence found in a few of the RCTs stating that surgery was a
more effective treatment than splinting but these articles were largely disregarded due to
surgery being considered a more invasive approach to CTS. Our review focused on
conservative treatments and how they compared with splinting. Overall, splinting is an effective
conservative treatment but as stated above, it is more beneficial to use splinting in conjunction
As occupational therapists, we will often come into contact with clients affected by carpal
tunnel syndrome. Although splinting is effective treatment for OT practice in reducing pain,
findings show that splinting coupled with other treatments is more effective at relieving
symptoms. Knowing this information, we will be able to make better recommendations for our
clients and utilize a larger base of treatment to alleviate pain in individuals with carpal tunnel
References
https://eccguidelines.heart.org/index.php/evidence_table/2010-aha-levels-of-evidence10/
Angelis, M. V., Pierfelice, F., Giovanni, P. D., Staniscia, T., & Uncini, A. (2009). Efficacy of a soft
hand brace and a wrist splint for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled study.
Brininger, T. L., Rogers, J. C., Holm, M. B., Baker, N. A., Li, Z., & Goitz, R. J. (2007). Efficacy of
a fabricated customized splint and tendon and nerve gliding exercises for the treatment
Bulut, G. T., Caglar, N. S., Aytekin, E., Ozgonenel, L., Tutun, S., & Demir, S. E. (2015).
Comparison of static wrist splint with static wrist and metacarpophalangeal splint in
carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal Of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 28(4), 761-
767.
Can carpal tunnel syndrome cause anxiety and depression? (2017, April 05). Retrieved April 23,
and-depression/
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Fact Sheet. (2017). Retrieved April 06, 2017, from
https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Carpal-
Tunnel-Syndrome-Fact-Sheet#3049_5
Cestia, K. E. (2011, April 15). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Retrieved April 06, 2017, from
http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0415/p952.html
Dincer, U., Cakar E., Kiralp M. Z., Kilac H., & Dursun H. (2009). The Effectiveness of Commented [AT15]: sentence case
Level Laser Therapies. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 27 (1), 119 -125
WS FOR CTS
10
doi:10.1089/pho.2008.2211
Gerritsen, A. A. (2003). Splinting vs. Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. JAMA: The Journal
Hall, B., Lee, H. C., Fitzgerald, H., Byrne, B., Barton A., & Lee, A. H. (2013). Investigating the
effectiveness of full-time wrist splinting and education in the treatment of carpal tunnel
syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, Commented [AT16]: ital
448–459. https:/doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.006031
Khosrawi, S., Emadi, M., & Mahmoodian, A. E. (2016). Effectiveness of splinting and splinting
plus local steroid injection in severe carpal tunnel syndrome: A Randomized control
9175.175902
Mayo Clinic Staff Print. (2017, March 30). Overview. Retrieved April 05, 2017, from
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/carpal-tunnel-syndrome/home/ovc-
20313865
Medically Reviewed by William Morrison, MD on March 16, 2017 — Written by The Healthline
Editorial Team. (2017, March 16). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Retrieved April 06, 2017,
from http://www.healthline.com/health/carpal-tunnel-syndrome#causes2
Page, M. J., Massy-Westropp, N., O'Connor, D., & Pitt, V. (2012). Splinting for carpal tunnel
Piazzini, D., Aprile, I., Ferrara, P., Bertolini, C., Tonali, P., Maggi, L., & Padua, L. (2007). A
Verdugo, R., Salinas, R., Castillo, J., & Cea, J. (2003). Surgical versus non-surgical treatment
doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001552
WS FOR CTS
11
What Is The Cost Of Carpal Tunnel Surgery? (n.d.). Retrieved April 09, 2017, from
https://www.mycarpaltunnel.com/cost-carpal-tunnel-surgery.shtml
Yagci, I., Elmas, O., Akcan, E., Ustun, I., Gunduz, O. H., & Guven, Z. (2009). Comparison of
splinting and splinting plus low-level laser therapy in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.
Table 1. Overview of articles chosen to use in our review Commented [AT18]: chart looks great!
Study Design Population Outcome Measures Findings
Brininger, T. L., Rogers, Four groups N=61 subjects Focused on varying Splinting was reported by 62.7%
J. C., Holm, M. B., Baker, randomly (14 men, 47 kinds of splints and of the subjects to be the most
N. A., Li, Z., & Goitz, R. assigned Groups women) looking at their beneficial intervention.
J. (2007). were to receive Mean age of 50 overall
varying kinds of years old with effectiveness for Results suggest that certain
splints, exercises mild to moderate CTS. kinds of splints were more
and amounts of carpal tunnel Assessments used: effective than others.
time. syndrome CTS Symptom
Level of Inclusion criteria: Severity Scale Customized splints may be more
evidence: 1 18 years old, (SSS) and the effective than off the shelf splints.
PeDRO score: positive Tinel sign Functional Status
5/10 or Phalen's Scale (FSS) used Wrist splinting significantly
maneuver and to assess CTS reduces symptoms and improves
complaints of symptoms and function short term.
nocturnal functional status
numbness. Measured at
baseline and 8
weeks post
treatment
Gerritsen, A. (2003) Two groups N=176 patients Number of nights Surgery reduced pain and
randomly (143 women, 4 waking up due to symptoms more than splinting.
assigned to men) pain and severity of
either receive Mean age: 49 symptoms.
wrist splinting at Inclusion criteria: Measured via
night for six Pain, questionnaires
weeks or open paresthesia, or given by trained
carpal tunnel hypoesthesia in therapists at the
release surgery. hand innervated baseline and at 3,
Level of by median nerve. 6, and 12 months
evidence: 1 Clinically after randomization
PeDRO score: confirmed CTS. began.
8/10
Angelis, M. V., Pierfelice, Two groups N=91 patients Looked at the Both hand and wrist splinting
F., Giovanni, P. D., randomly (79 females, 12 efficacy of wrist were found to be effective
Staniscia, T., & Uncini, A. assigned to use males) splinting versus a treatments for reducing CTS
(2009) either a soft hand Mean age: 46 soft hand brace. symptoms.
brace or a wrist Inclusion criteria: Assessments used:
splint. pain, numbness The Italian version Average pain and paresis scores
Level of and abnormal of the Boston for VAS scale were reduced
evidence: 1 sensation in the Carpal Tunnel
PeDRO score: median nerve. Questionnaire: Symptomatic relief seems to fade
5/10 Exclusion criteria: used to evaluate and improvement in functionality
previous CTS symptomatic and does not persist, may need to
surgeries, steroid functional scores. repeat treatment periodically.
injections, The Visual
rheumatoid Analogical Scale
arthritis or signs (VAS): measures
of neuropathy. changes in pain
and paresis.
Measured at
baseline, 3 and 9
months post
treatment
Page, M. J., Massy- Systematic N=1,190 (179 Many different Evidence supporting splinting is
Westropp, N., O'Connor, review that men, 839 women, outcome measures an effective treatment compared
WS FOR CTS
13
D., & Pitt, V. (2012). looked at 19 97 undescribed were used across to not splinting.
studies with no gender) the studies. Many
time limits that Mean age range: of them dealt with a
compared carpal 40-50 years reduction of CTS
tunnel symptoms such as
pain.
Yagci, I., Elmas, O., Two groups N= 45 (all Compared the Both splinting and splinting with
Akcan, E., Ustun, I., randomly females) efficacy of splinting laser therapy (SLLLT) provided
Gunduz, O. H., & Guven, assigned to Mean age: 50 and splinting plus improvements in clinical
Z. (2009) either splinting Inclusion criteria: low-level laser parameters but SLLLT is
group or splinting mild or moderate therapy for CTS superior to splinting.
plus low-level patients with CTS treatment.
laser therapy Exclusion criteria: Assessments used:
group. patients with Nerve conduction
Level of fibromyalgia, study (NCS),
evidence: 1 diabetes, radial Boston
PeDRO score: fractures, Questionnaire
7/10 pregnancy, (BQ), grip strength,
rheumatoid and clinical
arthritis or prior response criteria to
CTS treatment or measure function.
surgery. Measured at
baseline and 3
months after
treatment
Hall, B., Lee, H. C., Two groups N=62 Compared the Results suggest that splinting
Fitzgerald, H., Byrne, B., randomly (71% women) effectiveness of with an education program on
Barton A., & Lee, A. H. assigned to Mean age: 53.8 splinting to splinting how to use the wrist splint
(2013) either control Inclusion criteria: with an education reduced pain symptoms more
group (splinting) Age ≥ 18 yr., program. than splinting alone. This
or treatment Assessment used: suggests Splinting is an effective
group (splinting paresthesia in the The Boston Carpal treatment for pain when
with education). median nerve Tunnel completed properly.
Level of Questionnaire:
evidence: 1 night or day, measured function
PeDRO score clumsiness, grasp and symptom
5/10 severity. The Visual
weakness, sleep Analog Scale (VAS:
disturbance, no measured pain.
Dynamometer: grip
medical strength. Purdue
intervention, no Pegboard Test: for
finger dexterity:
conservative Semmes–
treatments in the Weinstein
Monofilament: for
past 6 mo. light touch. The
Phalen’s test: for
numbness.
Satisfaction
questionnaire
Khosrawi, S., Emadi, M., Two groups, N=43 (37 female, Questionnaire Steroids plus splinting showed
& Mahmoodian, A. E. randomly 6 male) evaluating better recovery results versus
(2016). assigned into Mean age range: satisfaction splinting only
either 51-52 Nerve conduction
conservative Inclusion criteria: items.
treatment Confirmed CTS Measured at
WS FOR CTS
14
Bulut, G. T., Caglar, N. Two groups, N=33 (30 Effectiveness of The study suggests that splinting
S., Aytekin, E., randomly females, 3 males) splinting with MCP with MCP splinting improves pain
Ozgonenel, L., Tutun, S., assigned into 11 bilateral CTS splinting compared symptoms more than splinting
& Demir, S. E. (2015). either in group 1 to splinting alone. alone. No statistically significant
conservative 10 bilateral CTS Assessments used: differences were found between
treatment, in group 2 Visual Analog these splints according to
Neutral volar Mean age: 44.4: Scale (VAS): electrophysiological testing.
static wrist splint, Exclusion criteria: subjective pain,
or neutral volar Underlying Saehan Hydraulic
static wrist splint disorders that Hand
with cause secondary Dynamometer: grip
metacarpophalan CTS; pregnancy;; strength.
geal splint. hx of steroid Electrophysiological
Level of injection to the Test Alpine Biomed
evidence: 1 carpal tunnel; Key point,
PeDRO score: thenar muscle CTS questionnaire:
6/10 atrophy; hx of severity of
traumatic or symptoms
inflammatory
events of hand;
other UE
disorders;
patients with
severe CTS
Dincer, U., Cakar E., Three groups N=100 hands (50 Assessments used: The study suggests that splinting
Kiralp M. Z., Kilac H., & randomly women w/ Boston with ultrasound (US) and
Dursun H. (2009) assigned into bilateral CTS) Questionnaire, splinting with low level laser
three different Mean age: 51.2 patient satisfaction (LLL) therapy were more
conservative Exclusion criteria: inquiry, Visual effective at reducing symptoms
interventions; severe CTS, Analogue Scale than splinting alone. Splinting
splinting only, underlying (VAS) for pain, and with LLL therapy reduced
splinting plus US, disorders,, ENMG. symptoms more than the other
& splinting plus malignancy, two treatments.
LLL therapy. fractures, cervical
Level of radiculopathy,
evidence: 1 brachial
PeDRO score: plexopathy,
6/10 tenosynovitis,
fibromyalgia,
pregnancy, other
CTS treatment or
procedure within
the past year