FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Attachment B2 20XX/20XX

Final Year Project 1

Supervisor’s Rubric
Supervisor’s Evaluation (90%)

Student Name :
Matric No. : Programme: :
Supervisor :
Project Title :

Instruction: Please rate your student according to the marking criteria below. Fill in column “MARKS’ for each criteria with
0/1/2/3/4 (Marks in decimal point is not allowed).

Marking Criteria

Total Marks
Weightage

(n*w)
Mark
w

n
Criteria CO/PO n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 n=4
Problem was
Problem not Problem was Problem was
clearly
clearly identified and identified and
addressed, aim
identified/inaccur addressed in a addressed in a
and objectives
-ate and satisfactory good manner,
Problem, aim were clearly
explanation is too manner, aim and aim and
and stated and
Project CO1/ brief, aim and objectives were objectives were
objectives strongly
Significance PO4 objectives were stated and stated and
were not presented
(CH1) vague and not presented presented 15
identified and forefront in-
addressing forefront in-depth forefront in-
presented depth
forefront in- engineering depth
complex
depth problem in a engineering
engineering
engineering satisfactory problem in a
problem
problem manner good manner
Poorly
structured The review of The review of The review of
The review of
review of literature was not literature was literature was
literature was
literature structured in a sufficiently structured in a
Literature structured in a
CO2/ without clear order, and structured in a clear order;
review clear order,
PO11 citation of most citation of clear order, and however, some
(CH2) and citation of 20
references or references was some citation of citation of
references was
no review of not done references was not references was
done critically
literature at properly. done properly. done properly.
all
No research Unclear research Research gap and Research gap Research gap
gap and gap and problem problem and problem and problem
problem statement statement were statement were statement
CO1/
Research gap statement identified from fairly identified satisfactorily were clearly
PO4 5
(CH2) identified the literature from the literature identified from identified from
from the review. review. the literature the literature
literature review. review.
review.
75% of 50% references 75% references 100%
CO2/
References All references references were were not reliable were apparently references
PO11
(CH2) were not not reliable (e.g (e.g internet reliable (e.g were reliable 5
reliable internet content) content) and journals), (e.g journals),
(100% and relevant relevant relevant and relevant and
 Attachment B2 20XX/20XX
internet updated updated
content)

Project
Some project Project
No project Project approaches/met
approaches/meth approaches/m
approaches/ approaches/metho hods/
Project design ods/ parameters ethods/
CO3/ methods/ ds/ parameters parameters
Or approach were not outlined parameters 15
PO3 parameters were fairly were
(CH3) and/or without were clearly
were outlined and satisfactorily
any justifications outlined and
provided justified outlined and
provided justified
justified
Project
Project activities Project activities
Project activities activities were
were fairly were
were poorly clearly
Planning of identified but satisfactorily
CO4/ No project identified and not identified and
Project some were not identified and
PO8 schedule arranged arranged 5
Activities arranged arranged
provided practically in a practically in a
(Logbook) practically in a practically in a
project schedule project
project schedule project schedule
with timeline schedule with
with timeline with timeline
timeline
The work was
The concept of
The work was adapted from The concept of
the work is
The work was adapted from previous work the work is
CO4/ original/ novel
entirely previous works, and/or original/ novel
PO8 and/or
Originality adapted for did not demonstrated and/or 10
demonstrated
previous demonstrate creativity and demonstrated
creativity and
works creativity and critical thinking in creativity and
critical
critical thinking a satisfactory critical thinking.
thinking.
manner
The student
The student
did not
The student was The student was was very
demonstrate The student was
not committed committed and committed and
any form of committed and
and did not performed the diligent in
commitment diligent in
perform most tasks in the project performing the
in the work performing the
tasks in the in a satisfactory tasks in the
CO4/ (e.g never tasks in the
Commitment project (e.g manner (e.g project (e.g
PO8/ meet project (e.g
& Self seldom met usually met consistently 10
deadline, less consistently met
Initiatives deadline, only 3-4 deadline, 5-7 met deadline,
than 2 deadline, 8 – 10
discussion discussion more than 10
discussion discussion
meetings with meetings with discussion
meetings with meetings with
supervisor per supervisor per meetings with
supervisor supervisor per
semester, lack of semester, some supervisor per
per semester, semester,
self initiatives) self initiatives) semester, good
no self satisfactory self
self initiatives)
initiatives etc) initiatives)
The report was
structured in
The report was
The report was an orderly
poorly The report was
structured and manner, and
structured, and structured and
formatted (e.g: the formatting
the formatting formatted (e.g:
There was no font, spacing, (e.g: font,
Formatting (e.g: font, font, spacing,
CO5/ structure of labelling of spacing,
and spacing, labelling labelling of figures
PO9 report and figures and labelling of 5
organisation of figures and and tables,
the tables, figures and
of report tables, equations equations
formatting equations tables,
numbered and numbered and etc)
numbered and equations
etc) include very in a satisfactory
etc) in a good numbered and
substantial and manner
manner etc) was done
consistent error
properly in
accordance to
 Attachment B2 20XX/20XX
the FYP
guidelines

n= (n*w)
w=90 =
Total:

  (n * w) 
Final Mark :  :
 4 
 

Comments:

Examined by : Signature :

Date :