Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Mackenzie Petersen
Loras College
Why Torture Should Not Be Used, From a Psychology Standpoint 2
The use of torture has been around since the dawn of mankind. Torture has been used in
all aspects of life, but the biggest reasons that torture is used for is the obtainment of information
or a confession, discrimination, and the act of punishment (Williams & Merwe, 2013). Torture
can be instigated by anyone, but according to the 1984 United Nations Against Torture
Convention, it is considered torture when pain and suffering is intentionally inflicted on a person
by a public official or other person acting in an official capacity (Williams & Merwe, 2013).
When thinking of a public official, we often think of police and military, but psychologists can
also fall into this category of public official or other person acting in an official capacity.
Psychologists and other public officials should not resort to the use of torture for
numerous reasons: one being that torture is against the law and the American Psychological
Association, also known as the APA; torture results in negative and long-lasting consequences;
torture often results in false confessions; and the use of torture creates a bad reputation for the
Going into the field of psychology, psychologists know full well the importance of
following the APA Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics is a guideline for psychologists to use
when it comes to making decisions and participating in any aspect of the psychology profession.
According to Gauthier (2005), the guidelines of the APA Code of Ethics are founded on basic
principles and moral imperatives to guide behavior. In addition to a behavioral guideline, the
APA Code of Ethics provides specific codes of conduct which describe what psychologists can
The overall goal of the APA Code of Ethics is to protect civil and human rights and to
preserve the welfare of all individuals and groups of individuals that psychologists may work
with (American Psychological Association, 2002). When psychologists are participating in any
Why Torture Should Not Be Used, From a Psychology Standpoint 3
type of torture, whether it be the physical act of participating in torture, assisting, or overseeing
the use of torture, they are explicitly violating the entire goal of the APA Code of Ethics. Torture
is a direct violation of protecting human rights because it strips the individual whom is being
tortured of any rights and/or power. The use of torture also is a direct violation of preserving the
welfare of the victim because torture often results in negative physical, mental, and emotional
health consequences. The use of torture is the complete opposite of the APA Code of Ethics
The APA Code of Ethics also explicitly opposes and rejects psychologist involvement in
the use of torture in its ethical standards. Ethical standard 3.04 in the APA Code of Ethics is titled
“Avoiding Harm”. In this ethical standard, psychologists are to take reasonable steps to avoid
harm with all individuals whom they may be working with (American Psychological
Association, 2002). Ethical standard 3.04a also explains to minimize harm when harm in
participate in the use of torture, they are directly violating ethical standard 3.04 because torture
In 2016 the APA realized the severity of torture and decided to make an amendment to
ethical standard 3.04 in regards to the use of torture. Standard 3.04b specifically forbids
Psychological Association, 2016). In this ethical standard, the APA defines torture as any severe
physical or mental pain and suffering, which is intentionally inflicted on a person, and/or any
cruel and degrading behavior that violates ethical standard 3.04a (American Psychological
Association, 2016). Any kind of participation in torture is a direct violation of the APA Code of
Ethics.
Why Torture Should Not Be Used, From a Psychology Standpoint 4
When psychologists violate the APA Code of Ethics, especially violations of both aspects
of ethical standard 3.04 “Avoiding Harm”, they are purposefully causing harm to not only the
victim whom is enduring the torture, but to all whom are connected to the victim, including the
perpetrator themselves. Furthermore, failure to follow the Code of Ethics can result in serious
consequences for psychologists, including loss of job, removal of licensing, moral guilt, and in
Not only is the use of torture a violation of the APA Code of Ethics, it is also a violation
of international law. As a member of the United Nations, the United States, including
psychologists from the United States, are prohibited to use torture under the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (Costanzo et al, 2007). Under this treaty, torture is defined very
similarly to the APA’s definition of torture, with the exception of the purpose for attaining
information done by a public official or other person acting in an official capacity (Costanzo et
al, 2007). The use of this definition is mainly interpreted for the use of torture during
interrogations done by military officials. When officials and psychologists violate this law, it
creates a distrust among the United States and other members of the United Nations, which can
Torture is one of the most extreme forms of human violence and should not be used since
it results in serious negative health consequences for the victim. There are many different forms
of torture, but all forms are invasive and cause an enormous amount pain, both physically and
psychologically. There have been numerous studies and comprehensive reviews that have shown
that torture is directly linked to post-traumatic stress disorder, or also known as PTSD (Costanzo
et al, 2007). PTSD is a disorder in which individuals who have experienced a traumatic event,
including torture, show symptoms of intrusive thoughts, avoidance, negative thoughts and
Why Torture Should Not Be Used, From a Psychology Standpoint 5
feelings, and arousal and reactive symptoms (Parekh, 2017). PTSD can be long-lasting,
PTSD focuses on the trauma that an individual has experienced. Figley (2012) defines
trauma as a sudden and potentially deadly experience, which often results in long-lasting and
troubling memories. Trauma also captures three different aspects. The first aspect is that it is
caused by an external force, meaning it is not inflicted upon oneself. The second aspect is that it
is unwelcomed and violates any aspect of a person’s life. Lastly, victims of trauma do not have
control. By following Figley’s definition of trauma, it is easy to see that torture can be a definite
form of trauma.
Other than PTSD, Turner and Gorst-Unsworth (1990) have identified other common
themes that the use of torture produces. One theme is depression. Depression is often a result of
torture because of the losses that the victim experiences while enduring torture. The losses may
be objects, people, body parts, and self-esteem and dignity. Another theme is physical symptoms,
such as health considerations. Lastly, victims often experience the existential dilemma, which
confirms torture as a reality and often results in the victim questioning the importance and value
Torture can also result in a number of other consequences to the victim. Chronic pain is a
common consequence of torture (William & Merwe, 2013). Chronic pain can be physical and/or
psychological. Some common physical health problems that survivors of torture experience are
tuberculosis and immune deficiency, due to the lack poor nutrition and stress that victims of
torture generally go through (Williams & Merwe, 2013). Physical health problems can result in
further pain and often results in shorter life spans, which is devastating for human welfare and
human life.
Why Torture Should Not Be Used, From a Psychology Standpoint 6
adjustment problems (Williams & Merwe, 2013). In particular, victims of torture often feel guilt
and shame, due to the humiliation that they endured during torture (Williams & Merwe, 2013).
In general, these symptoms of torture can make it hard for survivors to complete day-to-day tasks
because it interferes with how an individual processes different emotions, perceives situations,
expresses feelings, and responds to known and unknown circumstances (Figley, 2012).
Not only does torture negatively affect the victim of torture, but also those connected to
the victim, including family and friends of the victim. When victims experience torture, they
often undergo psychological effects, which can result in social isolation, social withdrawal,
increased aggressiveness and irritability, confusion, and personality changes (Costanzo et al,
2007). All these symptoms can cause relationships to dissipate since the victim no longer feels
safe and distrusts others because of the trauma that he or she has faced. Because of these
symptoms, survivors may also have a harder time holding down a job, which can lead to
Experiencing trauma and PTSD are serious health concerns, not only for the negative
health consequences listed above, but because it can be long-lasting and can alter physiological
aspects of the brain and body. Due to the alterations of stress hormones that results from PTSD,
victims have trouble responding appropriately to stress (Costanzo et al, 2007). Stress also affects
the brain by altering the hippocampus. In a study done by Bremner and colleagues, MRI results
showed that combat soldiers who had experiences trauma had changes in their hippocampus,
which ultimately affected their memory (1995). Victims of torture often respond negatively to
stress and trauma because of the damage done to their brains and bodies, which can negatively
References
Association.
Bremner, J. D., Randall, P., Scott, T. M., Bronen, R. A., Seibyl, J. P., Southwick, S. M., Delaney,
R. C., McCarthy, G., Charney, D. S., & Innis, R. B. (1995). MRI-based measurement of
Costanzo, M., & Leo, R. A. (2007). Research and expert testimony on interrogations and
Costanzo, M., Gerrity, E., & Lykes, M. B. (2007). Psychologists and the Use of Torture in
Interrogations. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 7(1), 7–20. https://doi-
org.ezproxy.loras.edu/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00118.x
http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.loras.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=5
25926&site=ehost-live
www.am.org/iupsys/ethprog1.pdf.
Johnson, W. B. (2008). Top Ethical Challenges for Military Clinical Psychologists. Military
Complex Thinking. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 7(1), 55–63. https://doi-
org.ezproxy.loras.edu/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00125.x
Zimbardo, P., Haney, C., Banks, W. C. and Jaffe, D. (1971). The Stanford Prison Experiment: A
https://web.stanford.edu/dept/spec_coll/uarch/exhibits/Narration.pdf