Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
S1 EDUCATION
PHYSICS DEPARTEMENT
2017
Teaching and learning process is a dynamic interaction between educators who carry
out teaching tasks with students who carry out learning activities. The process of interaction
is very important in the continuity of teaching and learning process, because in the process
of teaching and learning educators convey a message in the form of knowledge, skills,
attitudes and ethics to the learners through the process of interaction.
Learning activities are often associated with teaching, even between learning and
teaching combined into learning and often also referred to as teaching and learning.
Studying on the part of the students is a basic claim even can be said to be the psychological
basis that allows pedagogical and didactic activities to proceed as expected. So the teacher
must understand what the essence of learning is, what can influence the learning activities,
and how the learning process takes place. So that teachers are able to plan and organize
the process of learning and teaching in the classroom.
Based on the above, it is necessary knowledge of the learning process. Every
individual has a different way of learning. These individual differences should be considered
in the teaching strategy so that every student can fully develop and master the learning
materials thoroughly. As we know that in the learning process can not be separated from
various difficulties. But this is a challenge for any teacher who wants his job truly as a
profession.
Development of learning tools is a series of processes or activities undertaken to
produce learning devices based on existing development theories. the steps that must be
taken in determining the learning strategy is related to the approach of teaching and learning
that is considered the most appropriate and effective to achieve the target. How does the
teacher perceive something the problem, concept, understanding, and theory that will be
used in solving a case, will greatly affect the outcome.
Then how is the importance of developing the learning strategy in influencing the
development of student's potential, the various methods arranged in the learning strategy
aims to provide clear and definitive knowledge about the learning, so as to determine what
aspects should be determined before starting the learning should be well prepared, so that
the learning process smoothly and can achieve the educational goals that have been set.
Discussion is one communication talking to one another, sharing ideas and opinions.
Discussion methods encourage students to dialogue and exchange opinions, with the aim
that students can be encouraged to participate optimally, without any rules that are too
harsh, but still must follow the agreed ethics. In this learning with the method of discussion,
the more opportunities for the students to be actively involved in learning even though the
teacher is still the main control. But every method of learning that is given there are certainly
advantages and disadvantages, so that teachers must understand the various methods of
learning so that teachers can choose and use the appropriate methods in accordance with
the material and learning objectives. Learning method used is expected to improve the ability
of learners in the process of thinking and expressing opinions.
FOREWORD
First of all, let us say praise and gratitude the presence of GOD Almighty God
Almighty, for His grace and the gift of the Mini Research Tasks can be done on time. We
would like to thank the lecturers Sir Prof. Dr. Mara Bangun Harahap, M.Si for their support
and directives, so I got knowledge about this task.
Mini Research purpose of the Report is in addition to fulfilling the tasks assigned also
to gain knowledge about the course of Strategy Teaching and Learning. We realize that
there are still many shortcomings in this paper, for that we expect criticism and positive
advice from fellow students and teachers for the betterment of the Day to come.
Team
Table Of Contents
Excecutive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 2
FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... 4
CHAPTER I ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
PRELIMINARY ................................................................................................................................................ 6
1.1 Background Problem ................................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Identification of Problem ............................................................................................................ 7
1.3 Limitation Problem ....................................................................................................................... 7
1.4 Formulation Problem ................................................................................................................... 7
1.5 Purpose Survey ............................................................................................................................. 7
1.5 Benefit Survey ............................................................................................................................... 8
CHAPTER II .................................................................................................................................................... 9
THEORITICAL ................................................................................................................................................ 9
A. Theoretical Review ....................................................................................................................... 9
B. Observed Concept............................................................................................................................. 10
C. Framework Of Thinking.................................................................................................................... 11
CHAPTER III ................................................................................................................................................. 12
METHODOLOGY SURVEY ........................................................................................................................ 12
A. Place and Time of Research ........................................................................................................ 12
B. Subject Research ........................................................................................................................ 12
C. Data Collection Technique ....................................................................................................... 12
D. Instrument Survey ...................................................................................................................... 13
E. Data Analysis Technique .............................................................................................................. 13
CHAPTER IV ................................................................................................................................................. 14
RESULT And DISSCUSSION .................................................................................................................... 14
A. Results Of Research .................................................................................................................. 14
B. Disscussion.................................................................................................................................. 16
CHAPTER V .................................................................................................................................................. 17
CLOSING ....................................................................................................................................................... 17
A. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 17
B. Suggestion ................................................................................................................................... 17
REFERENCE................................................................................................................................................. 18
CHAPTER I
PRELIMINARY
Education is a business or activity that is run intentionally, regularly and planned with
the intent to change or develop the desired behavior. School as a formal institution is a
means to achieve the educational objectives. Through school, students learn various things.
In formal education, learning shows a positive change so that in the final stages will be new
skills, skills and knowledge. The learning process is reflected in the optimal learning
outcomes. But in order to achieve satisfactory results required learning process.
The fact that happens to the present in every learning is often found problems
experienced by students at the time of learning so that this will affect the ability of problem
solving students' physics lessons. Low ability of problem solving of physics of student
because in process of physics teacher learning generally too concentrate on formula and
how it works. Teachers are centers of activity, while students during learning activities tend
to be passive.
Generally learning is done in a one-way form. Teachers have more lectures in front of
students while more students listening activities. In general, teachers rarely give students
the inspiration to be creative and do not train them to live independently. Teaching lessons
are less challenging to think. As a result students do not like the lesson.
One alternative in the ability of problem solving physics is to implement Problem Based
Learning (PBL) strategy in the ability of problem solving physics. In the PBL learning model
is started by the problem. This can be generated by students or teachers, then students
deepen their knowledge of what they already know and what they need to know to solve the
problem. Students can choose issues that are considered interesting to solve so they are
encouraged to play an active role in learning. The purpose of problem-based learning is to
require teachers to provide motivation and encouragement to students to solve problems in
learning and argued about the problems in the learning.
Problem Based Learning Model is an effort to involve students in doing the learning
process to find a solution in diagnosing a problem it faces. In the context of the students are
prepared to play a role in problem solvers by cooperation, inquiri and investigation.
Essentially the problem solving ability physics students are still low, because in physics
learning students only centered on the teacher so that students tend to passive. This should
be a model of learning to improve the ability of problem solving physics. One of the
alternative that can be applied in physics learning activity is through model problem based
learning.
This model can help students challenge their ability to solve physics problems as well
as provide satisfaction to discover new knowledge for students, improve students 'motivation
and learning activities, assist students in transferring students' knowledge to understand
real-world problems, helping students to develop new knowledge and be responsible in
learning which they do, and problem-based learning can encourage students to conduct
their own evaluation of both the results and the learning process.
CHAPTER II
THEORITICAL
A. Theoretical Review
Ownership of problem solving skills helps students think analytically in making
decisions in everyday life and helps improve critical thinking skills in dealing with new
situations (Utari, 2014: 297).
1. Learning Model
Suprijono (2010: 45) that "the learning model is the basis of the learning practice of
the result of the reduction of educational psychology theory and learning theory
designed based on the analysis of the implementation of the curriculum and its
implications on the operational level in the classroom, besides the learning model can
also be interpreted as the pattern used for the preparation curriculum, organize
material, and give instructions to teachers in the classroom ".
2. Problem Based Learning Learning Model
Problem Based Learning was first introduced in the early 1970s at the
McArthur University of the Medical Faculty of Canada, as an attempt to find solutions
in diagnosis by making inquiries according to the situation (Rusman, 2012: 242).
Yamin (2013: 81) argues that: Problem Based Learning is offering students
problems to solve individually or in groups, this strategy essentially trains the
cognitive skills of learners accustomed to solving problems, drawing conclusions,
seeking information and making artifacts as their report . The objectives of problem-
based learning according to Trianto (2007: 94) are: "1) Help students develop thinking
skills and problem-solving skills, 2) Learning the role of authentic adults, 3) Become
independent learner".
B. Observed Concept
Tabel 2.1
Fase 4 : Help students plan and prepare the appropriate work like
reports, videos, models, and help share tasks with friends
Develop and present the
work
The steps that will be done in problem based learning on the concept of observation
in problem solving are:
a. Students are given motivation by explaining the objectives of the material under
study and how students can provide samples of the material reviewed in everyday
life guided by the teacher. Examples of materials Identify the game of marbles,
where marbles are experiencing collisions with other marbles.
b. Students are made up of small groups of 4-5 people with instructions from
teachers. Then the students presented a problem relating to the material Identify
the game problem marbles, where marbles are experiencing collisions with other
marbles. to be studied in groups.
c. The group is given an opportunity to discuss the problem given with the group,
Where in such situations students learn to identify what problem ?, What is known
in the problem? How to step in finding solutions in solving the problem ?. This
activity continues in teacher supervision.
d. After each group finds the solution right then the fastest group is the group who
presented the results first, presented by one representative of the group. while the
group did not present as a correction group and was entitled to ask questions to
the presentation group.
e. The teacher as a companion to justify the presentation submitted by the advanced
group. Teacher tells where the misplaced and less precise on the results he did.
f. Teachers and students conclude related materials Identify marbles games, where
marbles experience collisions with other marbles according to learning materials
simultaneously and are given an evaluation at the end of the lesson.
g. During the learning process the teacher assesses each student.
C. Framework Of Thinking
The framework of thinking in research in problem based learning to the concept of
observation in solving the problem is;
Type:
(X1) and (X2): Student Opinion (Z): Result of Problem Based Learning
METHODOLOGY SURVEY
A. Place and Time of Research
This research will be implemented in SMK N 2 Medan School which is
located at Jl. STM No. 12 A, Sitirejo II, Medan Amplas, Medan City, North
Sumatera. The reason the researchers chose this school because in the second
semester we have done the apprenticeship I course from the campus. Time of
study to be implemented for 2 (two) months.
B. Subject Research
Subjects in this study is a class XI student of SMK Negeri 2 Medan T. A 2016/2017
of 37 people consisting of all male students.
A. Results Of Research
1. The effect of problem solving instruction on physics achievement
At the beginning and end of the study, both strategy and control groups we
asked to respond to PAT to measure their physics achievement. Means and standard
deviations of pretest and posttest score were calculated. Independent samples t-test
were employed to compere the groups mean pretest and posttest score respectively.
Comparisons between strategy and control group for PAT pretest and posttest;
CLOSING
A. Conclusion
From the results of the formulation of idea engineering The author concludes that:
1. The process of physics learning in fact that happens to the present often found
problems experienced by students at the time of learning, so this will affect the low
problem-solving skills in learning physics. This is because in the process of learning
physics teachers are generally too concentrated on the lecture method and
assignment problems. Teachers usually only explain the concept informatively in the
learning activities, giving examples of problems and questions or assignments. This
should have student problem-solving skills, as this ability can help students make
informed, thorough, systematic, logical and multifaceted decisions.
2. Model Problem Based Learning is an alternative to involve students in the learning
process, so that students find a solution in diagnosing a problem it faces. Teachers
provide opportunities for students to play a role in problem solving by collaboration,
inquiry and investigation. As for the purpose of doing this research, the researcher
hopes through model of Problem Based Learning as a new innovation so that
students can challenge their ability and give satisfaction to find new knowledge for
student, increase motivation and student learning activity, assist student in transfer
student knowledge to understand real world problem, helping students to develop
new knowledge and be responsible in their learning.
B. Suggestion
In the form of implementation so that this mini research efforts can be achieved both
teachers and learners should work together in Classroom Action Research (PTK) on
learning activities that occur in a class together. The action is given by the teacher or
the direction of the teacher conducted by students of SMK N 2 Medan class XI.
REFERENCE
Bilgen, Ibrahim, Senocak, Erdal, Sozbilir, Mustafa. 2008. Turkiye: Eurasia The Effects of
Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students Performance of Conceptual
and Quantitative Problem in Gas Consepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education. 5(2). 153-164.
Suprijono, Agus. 2010. Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi Paikem. Jakarta: Raja
Grafindo
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angket
ganze sezgin selcuk, dkk .2008. The effect of problem solving instruction on physics
achievement, problem solving performance and strategy use. Vol.2 No.3 ; Lat.Am.J.Phys.
Educ