Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
05
Is it right to ban Uber from London, since it does not break any rules and should be free to operate in a
capitalistic market?
Responsibility
Ubers claims itself to be a technology company, not a transportation provider. They do not follow expected
safety standards and would not take responsibility for the drivers, therefore, to some degree, exploitation of
drivers takes place. They are unprotected employees which cannot guarantee the safety of Uber users. This can
be perceived as morally wrong or bad.
Uber claims that cab drivers are self-responsible, because they have a driver’s license provided by the
government to guarantee they are allowed to take place safely in traffic. The government is in the end the agent
about safety and security of their society, and TfL provides a license to Uber
From the same viewpoint that they are a technical service, they make use of Greyball software;
o Greyballing does not break the law in the U.K., it is an acceptable business risk in the poorly governed realm
of cyberspace. Although, it annoys regulators, and creates a tense relationship with policymakers. It is a
technical strategy which takes place in a grey area. One could argue that this is also unethical behaviour
from Uber
Capitalism:
In a capitalistic economy Uber should be free to operate in the market with a profit-making view
Uber’s aim is to create a ‘sharing economy' in order for us to become a more socialized world
But it turned out that its extreme concentration on profits, Uber operates in line with Friedman’s (1970) claim:
that the purpose of companies is to focus on maximizing profit for the shareholders.
Conclusion: Legally it is not necessarily right to ban Uber, since they have not broken any hard laws. But for their
image to regulators, policymakers and to achieve progress, Uber needs to take responsibility for its actions, in order
for it to secure the safety of its customers and drivers. Moreover, the government should also behave more proactive
instead of reactive to solve these issues.
Tanja Begheijn S3018571 – Karlijn de Boer S0000000 – Ylona Mak S2349507 – Milan Shoukri S2803976
Business Ethics - Assignment 3: Newspaper presentation Group 6.05
Tanja Begheijn S3018571 – Karlijn de Boer S0000000 – Ylona Mak S2349507 – Milan Shoukri S2803976