Criteria 3 - 21.11.2018 2.30pm PDF

Velammal Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering
COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM 120

CRITERION 3
OUTCOMES
3. COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES
3.1 Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes
(POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
Program Outcomes (POs)
1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science,

engineering fundamentals, and engineering specialization to the solution of complex
engineering problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze engineering

problems to arrive at substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics,
natural, and engineering sciences.
3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering

problems and design system components, processes to meet the specifications with
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and
environmental considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge

including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of
the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modelling to complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge
to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional

engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the
knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and

responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member

or leader in teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
NBA-SAR-TIER II Page 77
10. Communication: Communicate effectively with the engineering community and

with society at large. Be able to comprehend and write effective reports
documentation. Make effective presentations, and give and receive clear
instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of

engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a
member and leader in a team. Manage projects in multidisciplinary environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological
change.
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES (PSOs)
Modernize/Automate/Adapt latest technology: (1) Graduates will be able to design,

develop and operate or document newer mechanical systems or processes using emerging
practices to enhance the productivity.
Optimization and Sustainability: (2) Graduates will be able to find sustainable, Cost
effective and environmental friendly methods to existing technology.
3.1.1 Course Outcomes (COs) (SAR should include course outcomes of one course
from each semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses
and made available as evidence, if asked)
Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6.
Process of framing Course outcomes:
 Course outcomes are framed by the course in charge who is handling the course in
the beginning of the semester. Curriculum gap if any is also filled to the level
possible by verifying the instructor report of the previous years.
 It is reviewed by Course coordinator and Module coordinator by referring the

course outcomes mapped in the previous years and its attainments.
 This is followed by submitting for approval to Head of the Department/Head of

the Institution. After getting approved, it is distributed to the students.
 The course outcomes framed as per the above mentioned guidelines for 6 subjects,
selectively one course from 3rd to 8th semester of the program is shown in tables
3.1.1(a) to 3.1.1(f) for the batch 2014-2018(Regulation 2013 syllabus)
REGULATION- 2013
Semester : III Year of Study:2015-16
Table 3.1.1(a). COURSE OUTCOMES OF CE6306-STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
Students will be able to
COs Statements
Apply mathematical knowledge to calculate the deformation behavior of simple
CE6306.1
structures
Analyze and solve the problems related to mechanical elements and also they can
CE6306.2 determine the deformation behavior for different types of beams subjected to
various loads.
Comprehend the importance of designing of shafts and springs based on strength
CE6306.3
and stiffness and its applications to various mechanical systems.
Understand the importance of beam deflection under different loads and help
CE6306.4
them designing various beams effectively
Understand the importance of designing of thin and thick cylinders used for
CE6306.5
specific purposes.
Apply engineering solutions in global and societal contexts for different load
CE6306.6
carrying members and will be able to design/develop suitable solutions.
Semester : IV Year of Study:2015-16

Table 3.1.1(b). COURSE OUTCOMES OF ME6402-Manufacturing Technology II
COs Statements
ME6402.1 Understand the concepts and basics of mechanics of metal cutting.
Recognize the functions and applications of different types of special purpose
ME6402.2
turning machines.
Adequate knowledge to apprehend the functions and applications of shaper,
ME6402.3
milling and gear cutting machines.
Appreciate the principles, functions and applications of different types of
ME6402.4
grinding and broaching machines.
Understand the basic concepts of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines
ME6402.5
and CNC Programming.
Analyze and compare the functions of different machines/tools and also exhibit
ME6402.6
programming skills in CNC machines.
Semester : V Year of Study:2016-17

Table 3.1.1(c). COURSE OUTCOMES OF ME6503-Design of Machine Elements
COs Statements
Understand various steps involved in the Design Process, principles involved in
ME6503.1 evaluating the shape and dimensions of a component to satisfy functional and
strength requirements.
Apply the concepts for design of shafts and couplings using standard practices
ME6503.2
and datas.
Apply adequate knowledge to use standard practices and datas while designing
ME6503.3
temporary and permanent fasteners.
Comprehend and apply standard design procedures while designing energy
ME6503.4 storing elements and familiarize with usage of catalogues and standard machine
components.
ME6503.5 Apply standard design principles and to use catalogues while designing bearings.
ME6503.6 Analyze successfully and design various sustainable machine components.
Semester : VI Year of Study:2016-17

Table 3.1.1(d). COURSE OUTCOMES OF ME6603-Finte Element Analysis
COs Statements
Understand the principles of Mathematical Modeling of field problems in
ME6603.1
Engineering
Apply the principles of FEM to solve one dimensional structural and thermal
ME6603.2
problems.
Apply the principles of FEM to solve two dimensional scalar variable problems
ME6603.3
in structural and thermal analysis.
Apply the principles of FEM to solve two dimensional vector variable problems
ME6603.4
in structural and thermal analysis.
ME6603.5 Analyze and formulate isoparametric elements and its uses.
Comprehend different mathematical Techniques used in FEM analysis and use
ME6603.6
them in Structural and thermal problems.
Semester : VII Year of Study:2017-18

Table 3.1.1 (e). COs OF ME6703-Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
COs Statements
ME6703.1 Understand about the fundamentals of CAD/CAM and components of CIM
Understand the concepts of approach to process planning activities using
ME6703.2
production planning and controls.
Understand the importance of Group technology and usage of computers in
ME6703.3
cellular manufacturing.
Comprehend the principles and benefits of FMS, working and applications of
ME6703.4
AGVs in shop floor.
ME6703.5 Recognize the fundamentals of Industrial Robotics and its applications.
Apply the usage of computers in various aspects of Manufacturing viz., Design,
ME6703.6
planning, Manufacturing cost, Layout & Material Handling system.
Semester : VIII Year of Study:2017-18

Table 3.1.1 (f). COURSE OUTCOMES OF IE6605-Production Planning and Control
COs Statements
IE6605.1 Understand the importance of production systems and their characteristics.
Apply tools for method study and work measurement and also they will recognize
IE6605.2
the basics of choosing an effective method and standards.
Use adequate knowledge on ascertaining/applying the concepts of production
IE6605.3
plans & processes planning for higher productivity
Apply the concepts of production scheduling techniques to various production
IE6605.4
systems.
Categorize MRP and JIT systems against traditional inventory control systems for
IE6605.5
various applications.
Comprehend role of finance in effective management of production systems and
IE6605.6
its applications.
3.1.2 (a). CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be

mentioned; one per semester from 3rd to 8th semester)
 The above framed Course Outcomes(COs) are then mapped to the Program Outcomes
(POs) and Program Specific Outcomes(PSOs) for all the courses from 3rd to 8th
semester.
 The respective CO-PO and CO-PSO matrices with a scale of correlation 3(High),
2(Medium), 1(Low) and – (No correlation) are being mapped meticulously for the
respective subjects by the course in charge after the approval from the course
coordinator, module coordinator and Head of the Department.
 The CO-PO/PSO mapping framed as per the above mentioned guidelines for 6
subjects, selectively one course from 3rd to 8th semester of the program is shown in
tables 3.1.2(a) to 3.1.2(f) for the batch 2014-2018.
REGULATION- 2013
Semester : III Year of Study:2015-16
Table 3.1.2 (a). CO-PO/PSO MATRIX OF CE6306-Strength of Materials
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
CE6306.1 2 2 1 1 - - - - - 1 1 1 2 1
CE6306.2 3 2 1 1 1 - - - - 1 - 1 2 1
CE6306.3 3 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 2 1
CE6306.4 3 2 1 1 1 - - - - 1 - 1 2 1
CE6306.5 3 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 2 1
CE6306.6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - 1 2 1
CE6306 2.5 1.8 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 2 1
Semester : IV Year of Study:2015-16

Table 3.1.2(b). CO-PO/PSO MATRIX OF ME6402-Manufacturing Technology II
ME6402.1 3 2 1 - - - - - - - - 2 2 2
ME6402.2 3 2 1 - - - - - - - - 2 2 2
ME6402.3 3 2 1 - - - - - - - - 2 2 2
ME6402.4 3 2 1 - - - - - - - - 2 2 2
ME6402.5 3 2 1 1 2 - - - - - - 2 3 2
ME6402.6 3 2 2 2 - 1 1 - - - - 2 3 2
ME6402 3 2 1.2 1.5 2 1 1 - - - - 2 2.3 2
Semester : V Year of Study:2016-17

Table 3.1.2(c). CO-PO/PSO MATRIX OF ME6503-Design of Machine Elements
ME6503.1 3 2 2 1 - - - - - - - 2 3 2
ME6503.2 3 2 2 1 - - - - - - - 2 3 2
ME6503.3 3 2 2 1 - - - - - - - 2 3 3
ME6503.4 3 2 2 1 - - - - - - - 2 3 3
ME6503.5 3 2 2 1 - - - - - - - 2 2 2
ME6503.6 3 2 2 1 3 - - - 2 - 2 3 3
ME6503 3 2 2 1 3 - - - 2 2 - 2 2.8 2.5
Semester : VI Year of Study:2016-17

Table 3.1.2(d). CO-PO/PSO MATRIX OF ME6603-Finite Element Analysis
ME6603.1 3 2 2 3 - - - - 1 - 1 2 2 1
ME6603.2 3 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - 1 2 3 2
ME6603.3 3 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - 1 2 3 2
ME6603.4 3 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - 1 2 3 2
ME6603.5 3 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - 1 2 3 2
ME6603.6 3 3 2 3 3 - - - 1 - 1 2 3 2
ME6603 3 2.8 2 3 3 - - - 1 - 1 2 2.8 1.8
Semester : VII Year of Study:2017-18

Table 3.1.2(e). CO-PO/PSO MATRIX OF ME6703-Computer integrated Manufacturing
Systems
ME6703.1 2 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 3 3
ME6703.2 3 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 2 1
ME6703.3 3 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 2 1
ME6703.4 3 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 3 2
ME6703.5 2 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 3 3
ME6703.6 3 2 1 - - 2 - - - - - 1 3 2
ME6703 2.7 1.7 1 1 - 2 - - - - - 1 2.7 2.0
Semester : VIII Year of Study:2017-18

Table 3.1.2(f). CO-PO/PSO MATRIX OF IE6605-Production Planning and Control
IE6605.1 3 2 - - - - - - - - - - 2 2
IE6605.2 3 2 - - - - - - - - - 1 3 2
IE6605.3 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 3 2
IE6605.4 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - - 3 2
IE6605.5 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 3 2
IE6605.6 - 1 - - - - - - - - 3 - 2 2
ME6703 3 1.8 2 - 1 - - - - - 3 1 2.7 2
3.1.3. Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses
 The average value of the PO/PSO contributed by all courses from first to final year
are gathered and the overall percentage contribution of the POs for Regulation 2013
syllabus was determined and is shown in table 3.1.3.
 The graphical representation of the program level CO-PO/PSO matrix is shown in
figure 3.1.3.
Table 3.1.3. Program Level CO-PO/PSO matrix for Regulation 2013
Courses PO1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2

C101 - - - - - - 3.00 - - - - - - -
HS6151
C102 3.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - - 2.00 - - - 2.00 -

MA6151
C103 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00

PH6151
C104 - - - 2.00 - - - - - - - - 3 -
CY6151
C105 2.67 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - 1.17 - 1.17 2.00 1.00

GE6152
C106 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 3.00 2.00
GE6151
C107 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00
GE6161
- -
C108 GE6162 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 - 2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
C109 GE6163 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - - -
- -
C110 HS6251 - - - - - - 3.00 - - - - -
2.00 -
C111 MA6251 3.00 2.00 2.00 - - - 2.00 - 2.00 - - -
C112 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00

PH6251
C113 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - 3.00 -
CY6251
C114 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
GE6252
C115 3.00 2.17 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 2.00 1.00
GE6253

C116 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
GE6261
C117 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00

GE6262
C201 3.00 2.17 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 -

MA6351
C202 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.17 - 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 - - 1.00 2.00 2.00
ME6301
2.33 2.67
C203 CE6451 2.67 2.33 1.80 1.50 2.00 - - - - - - 1.00
2.00 1.00
C204 CE6306 2.50 1.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.17 2.17
C205 ME6302 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00
C206 2.17 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 - - - - - - 2.00 3.00 1.00

EE6351
C207 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
ME6311
C208 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CE6461
C209 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 - 3.00 2.00 2.00
EE6365
C210 3.00 2.83 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
MA6452
C211 2.67 2.33 1.17 1.33 3.00 - - - 1.00 - 1.00 2.00 2.50 2.00
ME6401
C212 3.00 2.00 1.17 1.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 - - - - 2.00 2.33 2.00
ME6402
C213 2.83 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 2.00 3.00

ME6403
2.00 1.50
C214 GE6351 - - - - - 1.17 2.67 - - 1.83 - 1.00

C215 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.33 - 1.00 - - 1.50 1.00 - 2.00 2.67 2.00
ME6404
C216 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
ME6411
3.00 3.00
C217 ME6412 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
C218 CE6315 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
2.17 2.00
C301 ME6501 3.00 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.33 - - - 2.17 2.20 1.33 1.17
C302 3.00 3.00 1.83 - 2.00 2.00 3.00 - 1.25 - - - 3.00 2.17
ME6502
C303 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.83 2.50
ME6503
C304 2.50 1.83 1.20 1.20 1.00 - 1.00 - - - - 1.00 1.83 1.50
ME6504
C305 3.00 3.00 2.17 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.50 2.00
ME6505
C306 - - - - 2.50 3.00 2.33 3.00 2.50 2.17 2.50 2.67 3.00 2.00
GE6075
C307 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
ME6511
C308 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
ME6512
C309 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
ME6513
2.00 1.00
C310 ME6601 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 1.00
1.17 0.33
C311 MG6851 - - - - - 1.17 - 1.67 2.00 2.00 2.83 1.00
3.00 3.00
C312 ME6602 3.00 1.00 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 1.00 - - -

C313 3.00 1.80 1.75 2.50 2.50 - - - 2.17 - 1.97 1.40 2.83 1.83
ME6603
C314 2.83 1.83 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - - 1.17 2.67 1.67

ME6604
1.67 0.83
C315 ME6004 2.83 1.83 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - - 1.17
C316 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
ME6611
C317 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
ME6612
C318 - - 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
GE6674
C401 3.00 1.83 1.40 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - 2.00 1.00 1.83 2.00
ME6701
C402 2.17 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 - - - 1.00 2.67 2.33
ME6702
C403 2.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - - 1.00 2.67 2.00

ME6703
C404 2.00 1.67 - 2.00 1.67 1.00 3.00 - 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.83 2.00
GE6757
1.67 1.00
C405 ME6005 2.83 2.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 - - - 2.17 1.33 1.67 1.17
2.00 3.00
C406 ME6012 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00
3.00 3.00
C407 ME6711 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C408 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
ME6712
C409 3.00 - - 3.00 3.00 1.00 - - 3.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 1.00
ME6713

C410 1.50 2.00 - 1.00 1.67 2.00 - - - 1.33 1.50 1.00 1.67 1.40
MG6863
C411 3.00 1.83 2.00 - 1.00 - - - - - 3.00 1.00 2.50 1.17

IE6605
C412 2.00 1.67 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 2.00 - 1.00 - - 1.00 2.67 2.00
ME6016
C413 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
ME6811
AVERAGE 2.86 2.20 1.81 2.04 2.27 1.89 2.03 1.98 2.21 1.92 1.87 1.75 2.21 1.85
PERCENTAGE 95% 73% 60% 68% 76% 63% 68% 66% 74% 64% 62% 58% 74% 62%
Correlation levels 1,2,3 as define below

1-Low 2-Medium 3- High There is no correlation “-“
Figure 3.1.3. Program Level CO-PO/PSO mapping
 From figure 3.1.3, it is observed that the R2013 curriculum, PO1 (Engineering
Knowledge) contributes 95% of all the course outcomes of the program where as
PO12 (Life long learning) contributes 58% of all the course outcomes.
 The other program outcomes (PO2 to PO11) contribute ranging from 60% to 74% of
all the COs of the program.
 Similarly PSO1 contributes 74% of all the course outcomes of the program while
PSO2 contributes 62% of all the COs .
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes
3.2.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the
evaluation of Course Outcome is based
Assessment tools are categorized into two methods to evaluate the attainment of course
outcomes:
1. Direct Methods 2. Indirect methods.
Direct methods display the student’s knowledge and skills from their performance in
the Internal Assessment-I, Internal Assessment-II, Internal Assessment-III, Model
Examination & University examination, seminars, and assignments etc. These methods
provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of
student learning. Indirect methods such as course end survey are used for the attainment
processes and are described in table 3.2.1(a).
Table 3.2.1(a). Course Outcome Attainment methodology
Direct Assessment Methods

Direct
Sl.
Assessment Description
No
Methods
It is a metric to continuously assess the attainment of course outcomes,
student’s learning domains and thus improve the teaching –learning
process. The Internal Assessment marks in a theory paper will be
Internal
1 based on 4 (IA1, IA2, IA3 & MODEL) tests generally conducted in
Assessment
each semester. Retest(s) will be conducted for the non performing
students after each assessment of the semester to give an opportunity
to such students to improve their subject understanding.
Laboratory Assessment is mainly to assess student’s practical

knowledge with their designing capabilities. In the case of laboratory
Laboratory courses, the Internal Assessment marks will be based on Model
2
Assessment Examination which is generally conducted at end of the semester and
the marks for each experiment in record and observation note books
will be allotted.
Direct Assessment Methods

Direct
Sl.
Assessment Description
No
Methods
University Semester theory examinations are the metric to assess whether all the
3
Theory course outcomes are attained with respect to course objectives.
Examination Semester Examination is more focused on attainment of course
University outcomes and uses a descriptive examination.
4 Practical For practical courses, semester examination focuses on conduction of
Examination experiments and Viva -Voce
Students are encouraged to do mini projects in second year, design and

Mini fabrication projects in third year and they work as a team to contribute
project/Design to the course outcomes and program outcomes. The design and
5
and Fabrication fabrication project is evaluated through viva voce examination
Project conducted by examiners from the university while the second year
mini projects are evaluated through “INNOVATE” competition.
Case study method helps for intensive study of a unit. The faculty
prepares case study for their respective subjects for each unit and
6. Case study
assign to the students. The students will be asked to present and
discuss case study.
The Assignment marks in a theory paper will be based on 3
7. Assignment assignments of 20 marks each to assess the learning outcomes of the
course in every semester.
The Internal Assessment marks in case of project work for final year
students will be based on the evaluation in the 8th semester by a
committee consisting of the Head of the Department and three project
review members of the program with relevant specialization, one of
whom will be the project guide.
8. Project Work
Four reviews will be conducted for the project work and the project
review committee members will assess the performance of the students
during these reviews
Viva-voce examination for project work will be conducted by the
University appointed examiners for end semester examination.
Indirect Assessment Methods
Course End The feedback will be collected from the students to assess the learning
1.
Survey outcomes of the course at the end of the semester
Assessment tools: The process for assessment and attainment of COs are explained in table
3.2.1(b) and figure.3.2.1. The assessment tools are selected based on the nature of the courses
(eg. Theory, Lab and Project) and the performance of the students are evaluated for each
COs. The overall CO attainment has been calculated by considering 60% of CO attainment
obtained using internal assessment and 40% of CO attainment obtained using university
exam. The attainment of COs against the target is checked and the level of attainment and the
level of competency are discussed in the PAC, if the target is achieved. Otherwise, PAC
meeting is conducted to discuss the necessity of amendments in content delivery method,
content beyond syllabus and assessment method by considering the
course evaluation and instructor report in order to achieve the CO attainment against the
target.
Table 3.2.1(b). Course Outcome Assessment tools and frequency of use for direct and
indirect methods
CO Direct Assessment Methods

S. Assessment Assessment
Assessment Tool In charge Reviewer
No Method frequency
Every 2.5 to 3 Student’s performance

Internal
weeks of each in internal assessment
1 Assessment Course In
semester. answers booklets.
Test charge, Head of the
Course Department/
Laboratory Model Student’s performance
Coordinator Academic
Assessment Practical in conducting
2 & Module coordinator
Test Examination experiments
coordinator
Theory &
Practical At the end of Student’s performance
3 University Evaluators
Semester the semester in university exams.
Examination
Reviews,
Demonstration, Viva
Mini voce, Paper
project/Design
During 3rd and presentation in
Project
4 and
5th semester conference, journal
Guide/ Head of the
Fabrication publication
project Project Department/
Review PAC members
Reviews,
committee
Demonstration, Viva
members.
5 Project During the 8th voce, Conference
semester presentation, journal
publication
CO Indirect Assessment Methods

S. Assessment Assessment
Assessment Tool In charge Reviewer
No Method frequency
PAC members
Course End End of the Feedback report
1 Course in charge & Head of the
Survey Semester of the survey
Department
Figure 3.2.1 Evaluation of Course Outcome Attainment
3.2.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to
set attainment levels.
The direct and indirect assessment weightage to evaluate the CO attainment of all
courses with respect to set attainment levels is shown below in table 3.2.2(a).
 Internal Direct Assessment (IDA):- Marks secured in internal assessments, model

examination and assignments.
 Internal Indirect Assessment (IIA):- Consolidation of student exit survey on a

scale of 1-4.
 External Assessment:- Marks secured in Anna University examination.
Table 3.2.2(a). Direct and Indirect Assessment Weightage
Assessment Weightage
CO- Internal Direct Assessment (IDA) 80%
CO- Internal Indirect Assessment (IIA) 20%
CO-Internal Assessment 60%
(IDA(80%+IIA(20%)
CO-External Assessment 40%
Total
Internal Assessment (60%) + 100%
External Assessment (40%)
Internal Direct Assessment

 The micro level distribution of COs weightage in all internal exams through direct
assessment process is shown in table 3.2.2(b)
Table 3.2.2(b). Micro level distribution of COs weightage in all Internal Direct Assessment
Examinations
Course
S.No Unit Assessment Tools Weightage
outcome
1. I CO1 Internal Assessment 1 70%
Assignment 1 10%
Model Examination 20%
2. II CO2 Internal Assessment 1 35%
Internal Assessment 2 35%
Assignment 1 10%
3. III CO3 Internal Assessment 2 70%
Assignment 2 10%
4. IV CO4 Internal Assessment 3 70%
Assignment 2 10%
5. V CO5 Internal Assessment 3 70%
6. CO6 Assignment 3 100%
Expected level of Competency: 60 Expected level of Attainment: 60

 The expected level of competency and attainment is fixed as 60 for all the courses and
the indirect assessment method for CO attainment is discussed below.
Indirect Assessment for CO attainment

 The Course end survey is a questionnaire on student experiences distributed at the
conclusion of each course.
 The purpose of this survey is to understand how well this course enabled the students
to learn and to improve course delivery in the future.
 The sample course end survey questionnaires is shown in table 3.2.2(c)and the
responses from all the students at the end of each semester for all courses are
collected to calculate the CO attainment through indirect assessment process.
Table 3.2.2 (c) Sample Course End Survey questionnaire
VELAMMAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CHENNAI – 601 204

Department of Mechanical Engineering
Course End Survey
Name of the Course with Course Code: CE6306 / STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
Academic Year : 2017 – 18 Year: II Semester: III

Section: -
Name of the Student : Gender: Male Female
University Register No:
E-mail:
I.Comments on quality of teaching and materials presented
Parameters on Course delivery Excellent Very Good Good Average
Overall the lecture Presented was

The hand out material for each unit was
II. Assessment of Course Outcomes
The outcomes are statements that describe the expected accomplishments by the student
at the end of the course. Please rate each of them in terms of your preparedness for your
end semester examination, and state how well your course teacher helped you in
achieving the same.
Very
COURSE OUTCOMES Excellent Good Average
Good
Have gained basic knowledge in stress, strain
& deformation of solids and its engineering
CE6306.1 applications.
I have gained basic knowledge on
deformation of simple & compound bars.
I will be able to analyze the transverse
loading on di ffe rent t yp es o f beams.
CE6306.2 I will be able to expertise the theory of simple
bending & bending stress distribution for
various structures.
I have gained basic knowledge in
CE6306.3 torsion formulation stresses &
deformation in circular & hollow shafts.
Will be able to analyse the deflection and
CE6306.3 stresses in both open and closed coil helical
springs.
I have gained basic knowledge about

deflection of beams by double integration
method & macaulay’s method..
CE6306.4
The course helps me to understand the
conjugate beam & strain energy, maxwell’s
reciprocal theorem.
The course helps me to understand the
stresses in various cylindrical structure,
CE6306.5 spheres.
I will be able to analyse the deformation in
spherical shells.
I will be able to perform mathematical
knowledge to calculate the deformation
behavior of simple structures.
CE6306.6 I will be able to analyse problem & solve
the problems related to mechanical elements
& analyse the deformation behavior for
different types of loads.
Signature of the Student
Based on the above direct and indirect assessment methods consolidated CO

attainment of all the courses including first year for the batch 2014-2018 is shown in
table 3.2.2(d).
Table 3.2.2(d). CONSOLIDATED CO ATTAINMENT OF ALL SUBJECTS

For the Batch 2014-18
Course
Course Name CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6
Code
C101 TECHNICAL ENGLISH -I 3 3 3 3 3 3
C102 ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS -I 3 3 1 3 3 3
C103 ENGINEERING PHYSICS-I 3 3 3 3 3 3
C104 ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY-I 3 3 2 3 3 3
C105 ENGINEERING GRAPHICS 2 2 2 3 3 3
PROBLEM SOLVING AND
2 3 3 3 2 3
C106 PYTHON PROGRAMMING
C107 PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY LAB-I 3 3 3 3 3 3
PROBLEM SOLVING AND
3 3 3 3 3 3
C108 PYTHON PROGRAMMING LAB
Course
Code
C109 TECHNICAL ENGLISH -II 3 3 3 2 2 3
C110 MATHEMATICS -II 3 3 3 1 1 3
C111 MATERIAL SCIENCE 3 3 3 3 2 3
BASIC ELECTRICAL,
ELECTRONICS AND
2 2 1 1 3 3
INSTRUMENTATION
C112 ENGINEERING
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND
3 1 3 2 2 3
C113 ENGINEERING
C114 ENGINEERING MECHANICS 3 3 3 3 3 3
ENGINEERING PRACTICES
3 3 3 3 3 3
C115 LABORATORY
BASIC ELECTRICAL
,ELECTRONICS AND
3 3 3 3 3 3
INSTRUMENTATION
C116 ENGINEERING LABORATORY
TRANSFORMS AND PARTIAL
C201 3 3 3 3 3 3
DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
ENGINEERING
C202 1 1 1 1 1 1
THERMODYNAMICS
FLUID MECHANICS AND
C203 2 2 2 2 2 3
MACHINERY
C204 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS 2 2 2 2 2 2
MANUFACTURING
C205 2 2 2 2 2 3
TECHNOLOGY I
ELECTRICAL DEVICES AND
C206 3 2 2 3 3 3
CONTROLS
MANUFACTURING
C207 3 3 3 3 3 3
TECHNOLOGY I LAB
FLUID MECHANICS AND
C208 3 3 3 3 3 3
MACHINERY LAB
C209 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING LAB 3 3 3 3 3 3
STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL
C210 3 3 3 3 3 3
METHODS
Course
Code
C211 KINEMATICS OF MACHINERY 3 3 3 3 3 3
MANUFACTURING
C212 1 2 2 2 2 2
TECHNOLOGY II
ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND
C213 3 3 3 3 3 3
METALLURGY
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND
C214 2 2 2 2 1 2
ENGINEERING
C215 THERMAL ENGINEERING 3 3 3 3 3 3
MANUFACTURING
C216 3 3 3 3 3 3
TECHNOLOGY LAB II
C217 THERMAL ENGINEERING LAB I 3 3 3 3 3 3
C218 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS LAB 3 3 3 3 3 3
C301 COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN 3 3 3 3 3 3
C302 HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER 2 2 2 2 2 2
C303 DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS 2 2 2 2 2 2
METROLOGY AND
C304 1 2 2 2 2 2
MEASUREMENTS
C305 DYNAMICS OF MACHINERY 3 3 3 3 3 3
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN
C306 3 3 3 3 3 3
ENGINEERING
C307 DYNAMICS LABORATORY 3 3 3 3 3 3
C308 THERMAL ENGINEERING LAB II 3 3 3 3 3 3
METROLOGY AND
C309 3 3 3 3 3 3
MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY
DESIGN OF TRANSMISSION
C310 2 2 2 2 2 3
SYSTEMS
C311 PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT 3 3 3 3 3 3
C312 AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING 3 3 3 3 3 3
C313 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS 3 2 2 3 3 3
GAS DYNAMICS AND JET
C314 3 3 2 3 3 3
PROPULSION

Course
Code
UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING
C315 3 3 3 3 3 3
PROCESSES
C316 CAD/CAM LABORATORY 3 3 3 3 3 3
DESIGN AND FABRICATION
C317 3 3 3 3 3 3
PROJECT
COMMUNICATION SKILLS-
C318 3 3 3 3 3 3
LABORATORY BASED
C401 POWER PLANT ENGINEERING 3 3 3 3 3 3
C402 MECHATRONICS 3 3 3 3 3 3
COMPUTER INTEGRATED
C403 3 3 3 3 3 3
MANUFACTURING
C404 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 3 3 3 3 3 3
PROCESS PLANNING AND COST
C405 3 3 3 3 3 3
ESTIMATION
C406 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING 3 3 3 3 3 3
SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS
C407 3 3 3 3 3 3
LABORATORY
C408 MECHATRONICS LABORATORY 3 3 3 3 3 3
C409 COMPREHENSION 3 3 3 3 3 3
C410 ENGINEERING ECONOMICS 3 3 3 3 3 3
PRODUCTION PLANNING&
C411 3 3 3 3 3 3
CONTROL
C412 ADVANCED IC ENGG. 3 3 3 3 3 3
C413 PROJECT WORK 3 3 3 3 3 3

3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
3.3.1 Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of
each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
(Describe the assessment tools and processes used to gather the data upon which the
evaluation of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes is based
indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out. Describe the assessment
processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes and Program Specific
Outcomes are attained and document the attainment levels)
Direct assessment and Indirect assessment are the two methods that are being used for
assessing the attainment of POs.
The course outcomes are mapped for each program outcome. The attainment of
course outcomes achieved are translated into program outcomes based on the CO-PO
Matrixes and course–PSO Matrixes.
 The Program Assessment Committee (PAC) meeting is conducted to fix the target for the
attainment of POs/PSOs based on the skill level.
 The attainment of POs / PSOs are calculated using two methods

i. Direct attainment
ii. Indirect attainment
 Direct PO/PSO attainment is calculated for all the courses in the program through
weighted average by considering the following inputs:
1. CO-PO mapping of courses
2. CO attainment level
 In indirect attainment method, the PO/PSO attainments are determined by the following
surveys:
1. Program Exit Survey
2. Alumni survey
3. Employer survey
 The cumulative PO/PSO attainment is calculated by considering 80% weightage for

direct attainment and 20% weightage for indirect attainment.
 The PAC members and HOD verify the PO/PSO attainment of the corresponding batch
at the end of 4th year.
The set target of PO/PSO will be revised after successful attainment of 3 consecutive
batches.

1. Direct Attainment:
This method of assessment is done to determine the extent to which the POs are
achieved by the students.
They are performed using the following methods:
 Through CO-PO mapping

 Activity Chart
Through CO-PO mapping: The inputs to this form of assessment are the results of IA1,
IA2, IA 3, model exam, University exam and assignments from which the outputs are
obtained and analysis were done. The attainment of COs are calculated and this analysis is
used in calculation of PO attainment through CO-PO mapping. The different components are
weighed based on the contribution that they render to the attainment of POs. The assessment
components are given in Table.3.3.1(a)
Table 3.3.1(a). Assessment components
Subject Type Assessment Components

Internal Assessment tests(IA1, IA2,IA3)
Model Exam
Theory End Semester University Examination
Assignment/Tutorial
Seminar
Observation
Record
Laboratory
Model Exam
End Semester University Examination
Internal Reviews(zeroth review,
preliminary review, progressive review
and final review)
Project
Demonstration
Viva Voce conducted through University
examination
Activity Chart: The organizing and participation details of students in activities like paper
presentation, project contests, seminars are grouped. An activity chart is framed relating to
these activities which contribute to each POs, especially to POs 6-12 to enhance their
psychomotor skills. The activity chart mapping is given below in table 3.3.1(b).

Table 3.3.1(b). Activity chart to enhance psychomotor skills
PO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Activities
K-level K3 K4 K5 K5 K6 K3 K2 K3 K3 K2 K3 K3
Organizing
Symposiums/Conferences/Workshops 1 2 3 3 1
Professional society activities 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 3 2
Participation
Professional society activities 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
Cultural events 2 2 2 3
Symposium Events 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3
NSS/NCC/Sports 3 3 3 3 3 1
Implant Training/ Internships 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
Workshops 3 2 2 2 3 2
2. Indirect attainment:
This method of assessment includes the data interpretation of results obtained from
the program exit survey, alumni survey and employer survey.
Program Exit Survey: Comments on the program is obtained from every final year student.
The feedback about individual POs are included in indirect assessment for PO attainment.
The frequency of assessment components of program exit survey is once in final semester as
shown in table 3.3.1(c).
Table 3.3.1(c). Frequency of Assessment components
S.No Component Frequency

1. Program Exit Survey Final semester of a batch
These assessments are done for each and every student in order to estimate the degree
to which the student has achieved the expected outcome of the course. Also the overall
average outcome of the batch is computed using these assessments. The format of Exit survey
is shown below in table 3.3.1(d).

Table 3.3.1(d). Sample students Exit survey questionnaire
Velammal Institute of Technology

Velammal Knowledge Park, Chennai Kolkatta Highway,
Panchetti, Chennai – 601 204.
Program Exit Survey

Name of the Department : MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
1. Year of Completion :
2. CGPA upto 7th Semester : Expected CGPA :
3. Which type of job will you most likely accept (now or after higher studies) ?
4. (Please put a √ mark).
Product Service Networking Teaching
5. How many job interviews you have attended? (Please put a √ mark).
0 1 2 3 4 5 More than 5
If so, specify the number of offers _____________________
Name of the Company opted or joined ____________________________________
6. Grade the following items for acquiring your skills and knowledge.(please put a √
mark).
Extremely Very Moderately Very low Not at all

Items helpful helpful Helpful helpful helpful
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Courses in major field
Elective courses
Projects / Seminars etc
Extra-curricular activities
Training Programs
7. For each of the items below rate your undergraduate program at Velammal Institute of
Technology (please put a √ mark).
Extremely Very much Moderately Very low Not at all

Items
Satisfied(5) satisfied (4) satisfied (3) satisfied(2) satisfied(1)
Relevance to career
goals
Inspiration and
Encouragement

Interaction with
faculty
Quality of Instruction
Satisfactory in
education
8. For each program outcomes mentioned below please provide your satisfactory rate
(by marking √ on the box) as a student of our college.
Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Poor

PO Programme Outcomes (POs)
(5) Good (4) (3) (2) (1)
1 Ability to apply knowledge of
Mathematics, Science and Engineering
2 Identify, Analyze, formulate and solve
complex engineering problems
3 Ability to design, develop and provide
a solution for complex problems
4 Conduct a thorough research on a
given proble
5 Select and utilize innovative
techniques and usage of modern tools
6 Apply contextual knowledge to assess
societal, and other issues during
profession
7 Understand the impact of solution in
local and global contexts
8 Ability to demonstrate knowledge of
professional and ethical responsibilities
9 Ability to function in a collaborative
way as a member of multidisciplinary
team
10 Ability to communicate effectively in
both verbal and written formats
11 Apply the knowledge of technology
and management principles to carry out
the projects
12 Ability to engage in lifelong learning
9. For each program specific outcomes mentioned below please provide your
satisfactory rate (by marking √ on the box) as a student of our college.

Very
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor
PSO Good
(PSOs) (5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Graduates will be able to design, develop
and operate or document newer
1 mechanical systems or processes using
emerging practices enhancing the
productivity
Graduates will be able to find sustainable,
Cost effective and environmental friendly
2
measures to existing technology.
10. Any additional comments about your experiences in the department as a student of
our college.
Name of the student :

Signature :
Place :
Date

Process for PO/PSO attainment

The process for PO/PSO attainment is shown in figure. 3.3.1(a). Direct assessment
and indirect assessment tools are used for the PO/PSO attainment process. In direct
assessment process, CO-PO/PSO mapping for all the courses are formulated and CO
attainments are calculated using the process described in figure 3.3.1(a). The PO/PSO
attainments have been computed using CO-PO/PSO mapping. Further, PO/PSO attainment
through exit survey has been computed in the indirect assessment. The overall CO-PO
attainment has been calculated by considering 80% of COs attainment obtained in direct
assessment and 20% of COs attainment obtained in indirect assessment. The evaluated
PO/PSO attainment is verified against the target and in turn, level of attainment and level of
competency are set to higher level, if the target is achieved. Otherwise, PAC is conducted to
discuss about the remedial actions for achieving the target in the subsequent year. The
frequency of reviewing the assessment methods and tools for PO/PSO attainment process is
described in table 3.3.1(f).

Figure.3.3.1(a). Process for PO attainment

Table 3.3.1(f). Frequency of Reviewing the Assessment Methods and tools
Assessment Assessment
Sl No Assessment Tool In charge Reviewer
Method frequency
PO/PSO Direct Assessment Method
Student’s
Every 2.5 to 3
Internal performance in Course In
weeks of each
1 Assessment internal assessment charge,
semester.
answers booklets. Course Head of the
Student’s Coordinator & Department/
At the end of performance in Module Academic
2 Lab Assessment the semester conducting coordinator coordinator
experiments
University
Student’s
Theory & At the end of
3 performance in University Evaluators
Practical the semester
university exams.
Examination
Reviews,
Demonstration,
4 Mini Viva voce, Paper
During 3 rd
project/Design
and 5th presentation in
and Fabrication Project Guide/ Head of the
semester conference
Project Project Review Department/
Reviews, committee PAC
Demonstration, members members
Viva voce,
Project During the
5 Conference
8th semester
presentation,
journal publication
PO/PSO Indirect Assessment Methods
1. Program Exit Annually Exit report after
Survey final year Alumni IQAC & Head
2 Employer’s Annually Performance report Association of the
Feedback on employees Committee Department
3. Alumni Survey Annually Exit report after
graduation

3.3.2 Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO

Program shall set Program Outcome attainment levels for all POs & PSOs.
(The attainment levels by direct (student performance) and indirect (surveys) are to be
presented through Program level Course – PO & PSO matrix as indicated).
 The program level results of the CO-PO/PSO consolidated attainment using direct
(student performance) and indirect (surveys) assessment processes are calculated and
tabulated for 2012-16 batch and is shown in table 3.3.2(a).
 Similarly, results of CO-PO/PSO for the batches 2013-17 and 2014-18 are also
calculated and shown in tables 3.3.2(b) and 3.3.2(c).
 The graphical representation of the overall PO/PSO attainment for the program level
is shown in figures 3.3.2(a) to (c) for the above mentioned three batches.

Batch 2012-16
Table 3.3.2(a). Program Level CO-PO/PSO Consolidated Attainment Matrix by Direct (Student Performance) and Indirect (Surveys)
PO/PSO DIRECT ATTAINMENT
C101 − − − − − − 2.00 − − − − − − −
C102 3.00 2.00 2.00 − − − − − 2.00 − − − 2.00 −
C103 3.00 2.00 − − − − − − − − 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
C104 − − − 2.00 − − − − − − − − 0.67 0.67
C105 0.90 0.67 0.33 − 0.67 − − − − 0.40 − 0.40 0.33 0.33
C106 2.00 2.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 − − − 1.33 1.33 − 1.33 1.33 0.67
C107 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 − − − 2.00 2.00 − 2.00 1.00 1.00
C108 2.00 2.00 2.00 − − − − − 2.00 − 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
C109 3.00 2.00 − − − − − − − − − − 1.00 1.00
C110 − − − − − − 3.00 − − − − − − −
C111 1.00 0.67 0.67 − − − 0.67 − 0.67 − − − 0.67 −
C112 1.00 0.67 − − − − − − − 0.67 0.67 0.33 0.33
C113 − − − 2.00 − − − − − − − 1.00 1.00
C114 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.33 0.67 0.67 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.33
C115 1.00 0.72 0.39 0.39 0.33 0.33 − − 0.33 − − 0.33 0.67 0.33


C116 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
C117 3.00 2.00 − − − − − − − − − − 1.00 1.00
C201 3.00 2.17 2.00 2.00 − − − − 2.00 2.00 − 2.00 2.00 −
C202 1.78 1.56 0.78 0.89 2.00 − − − 0.67 − 0.67 1.33 1.67 1.33
C203 2.67 2.33 1.80 1.50 2.00 − − − − − − 1.00 2.33 2.67
C204 2.50 1.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 − 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
C205 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 − − − − 2.00 2.17 2.17
C206 1.44 1.11 1.11 − 0.22 − − − − − − 1.33 2.00 0.11
C207 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C208 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C209 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 − 3.00 2.00 2.00
C210 1.00 1.00 0.61 − 0.67 0.67 1.00 0.42 − − − 1.00 0.72
C211 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.17 − 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 − − 1.00 2.00 2.00
C212 2.00 1.89 2.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 − − 1.33 1.33 0.67 1.33 1.33 1.33
C213 2.83 2.00 − − 2.00 2.00 2.00 − − − − 2.00 2.00 3.00
C214 3.00 2.00 1.00 − 1.00 − − − − − − − 2.00 1.00


C215 3.00 2.00 1.17 1.33 2.00 1.00 1.00 − − − − 2.00 2.50 2.00
C216 − − − − − 0.78 1.78 − − 1.22 − 0.67 1.33 1.00
C217 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C218 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C219 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 − − − 2.00 1.00 − 2.00 2.00 2.00
C301 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.44 0.33 − − 0.50 0.33 − 0.67 0.89 0.67
C302 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.67 0.67 0.67 − − 0.33 0.33 − 0.67 0.83 0.67
C303 2.00 1.33 1.33 0.67 2.00 − − − 1.33 1.33 − 1.33 1.33 2.00
C304 0.83 0.61 0.40 0.40 0.33 − 0.33 − − − − 0.33 0.61 0.50
C305 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 − − 1.00 − − − 2.00 2.00 2.00
C306 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
C307 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C308 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C309 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C310 3.00 1.00 − − − 2.00 2.00 − 1.00 − − − 3.00 3.00
C311 1.00 0.61 0.60 0.87 0.93 − − − 0.76 − 0.66 0.50 0.94 0.61


C312 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 − 1.00 − 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
C313 2.83 1.83 1.00 1.00 − 2.00 − − − − − 1.17 2.67 1.67
C314 − − − − − 1.17 − 1.67 2.00 2.00 2.83 1.00 1.17 0.33
C315 2.83 1.83 1.00 1.00 − 2.00 − − − − − 1.17 1.67 0.83
C316 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
C317 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
C318 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C401 0.89 0.56 0.33 0.33 − 0.67 − − − − − 0.33 0.89 0.67
C402 2.00 1.33 0.67 0.67 0.67 − − 0.67 0.67 − 1.33 1.33 2.00 1.33
C403 0.72 0.67 0.33 0.33 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.33 − − − 0.33 0.89 0.78
C404 1.00 0.61 0.47 − 0.33 0.33 0.33 − − − 0.67 0.33 0.61 0.67
C405 1.89 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 0.89 1.11 0.78 1.11 0.67
C406 1.33 1.11 − 1.33 1.11 0.67 2.00 − 2.00 1.33 1.33 0.67 1.22 1.33
C407 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C408 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
C409 3.00 − − 3.00 3.00 1.00 − − 3.00 2.00 − 3.00 2.00 1.00


C410 1.50 2.00 − 1.00 1.67 2.00 − − − 1.33 1.50 1.00 1.67 1.40
C411 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 − 2.00 2.00 − 2.00 2.00 3.00
C412 2.00 1.67 1.00 1.00 − 1.00 2.00 − 1.00 − − 1.00 2.67 2.00
C413 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
AVERAGE OF DA 2.31 1.76 1.43 1.73 1.86 1.62 1.75 1.78 1.89 1.66 1.59 1.49 1.71 1.49
80% OF DA 1.85 1.41 1.14 1.38 1.49 1.29 1.40 1.43 1.51 1.33 1.27 1.20 1.36 1.19
Average of Activities 1.79 1.79 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.61 1.61 1.62 0.45 1.48 1.37 1.70 0.40 1.55
10%of Activity chart
0.18 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.04 0.15
attainment
PO/PSO INDIRECT ATTAINMENT
Average of all
1.57 1.75 1.72 1.81 2.13 1.21 1.01 1.08 2.02 1.86 2.06 2.06 1.41 2.26
surveys
10% OF IDA(all
0.16 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.21 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.23
surveys)
OVERALL PO/PSO attainment(Direct and Indirect)
80% OF DA 1.85 1.41 1.14 1.38 1.49 1.29 1.40 1.43 1.51 1.33 1.27 1.20 1.36 1.19
10% OF Activity
0.18 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.04 0.15
chart attainment
10% OF IDA 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.21 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.23
TOTAL 2.18 1.76 1.47 1.72 1.86 1.58 1.66 1.70 1.76 1.66 1.62 1.57 1.55 1.57

Figure 3.3.2 (a). Overall PO/PSO attainment 2012-2016 Batch

Batch 2013-2017
Table 3.3.2(b). Program Level CO-PO/PSO Consolidated Attainment Matrix by Direct (Student Performance) and Indirect (Surveys)
C101 - - - - - - 2.00 - - - - - - -
C102 3.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - - 2.00 - - - 2.00 -
C103 1.00 0.67 - - - - - - - - 0.67 0.67 0.33 0.33
C104 - - - 0.67 - - - - - - - - 1.00 -
C105 0.89 0.67 0.33 - 0.67 - - - - 0.39 - 0.39 0.67 0.33
C106 2.00 2.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 - - - 1.33 1.33 - 1.33 2.00 1.33
C107 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00
C108 3.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - - 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 - -
C109 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00
C110 - - - - - - 2.00 - - - - - - -
C111 2.00 1.33 1.33 - - - 1.33 - 1.33 - - - 1.33 -
C112 2.00 1.33 - - - - - - - - 1.33 1.33 0.67 0.67
C113 - - - 1.00 - - - - - - - - 1.00 -
C114 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.33 0.67 0.67 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.33


C115 1.00 0.72 0.39 0.39 0.33 0.33 - - 0.33 - - 0.33 0.67 0.33
C116 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
C117 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00
C201 2.00 1.44 1.33 1.33 - - - - 1.33 1.33 - 1.33 1.33 -
C202 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.44 - 2.00 2.00 1.33 1.33 - - 0.67 1.33 1.33
C203 2.67 2.33 1.80 1.50 2.00 - - - - - - 1.00 2.33 2.67
C204 0.83 0.61 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 - 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.67 0.33
C205 2.00 1.33 0.67 0.67 1.33 1.33 1.33 - - - - 1.33 1.44 1.44
C206 2.17 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 - - - - - - 2.00 3.00 1.00
C207 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C208 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C209 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 - 3.00 2.00 2.00
C210 3.00 2.83 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C211 1.78 1.56 0.78 0.89 2.00 - - - 0.67 - 0.67 1.33 1.67 1.33
C212 2.00 1.33 0.78 0.89 1.33 0.67 0.67 - - - - 1.33 1.67 1.33
C213 1.89 1.33 - - 1.33 1.33 1.33 - - - - 1.33 1.33 2.00


C214 - - - - - 0.78 1.78 - - 1.22 - 0.67 1.33 1.00
C215 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.33 - 1.00 - - 1.50 1.00 - 2.00 2.67 2.00
C216 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C217 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C218 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C301 2.00 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.56 - - - 1.44 1.47 0.89 0.78 1.44 1.33
C302 2.00 2.00 1.22 - 1.33 1.33 2.00 - 0.83 - - - 2.00 1.44
C303 2.00 1.33 1.33 0.67 2.00 - - - 1.33 1.33 - 1.33 1.33 2.00
C304 1.67 1.22 0.80 0.80 0.67 - 0.67 - - - - 0.67 1.22 1.00
C305 2.00 2.00 1.44 1.33 1.33 1.33 - - 0.67 0.67 - 1.33 1.67 1.33
C306 - - - - 2.50 3.00 2.33 3.00 2.50 2.17 2.50 2.67 3.00 2.00
C307 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
C308 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
C309 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C310 2.00 1.33 0.67 0.67 2.00 0.67 0.67 - 0.67 - 0.67 0.67 1.33 0.67
C311 - - - - - 0.39 - 0.56 0.67 0.67 0.94 0.33 0.39 0.11


C312 2.00 0.67 - - - 1.33 1.33 - 0.67 - - - 2.00 2.00
C313 1.00 0.60 0.58 0.83 0.83 - - - 0.72 - 0.66 0.47 0.94 0.61
C314 0.94 0.61 0.33 0.33 - 0.67 - - - - - 0.39 0.89 0.56
C315 1.89 1.22 0.67 0.67 - 1.33 - - - - - 0.78 1.11 0.55
C316 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C317 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C318 - - 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
C401 2.00 1.22 0.93 - 0.67 0.67 0.67 - - - 1.33 0.67 1.22 1.33
C402 0.72 0.67 0.33 0.33 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.33 - - - 0.33 0.89 0.78
C403 0.89 0.56 0.33 0.33 - 0.67 - - - - - 0.33 0.89 0.67
C404 0.67 0.56 - 0.67 0.56 0.33 1.00 - 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.33 0.61 0.67
C405 1.89 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - 1.44 0.89 1.11 0.78 1.11 0.67
C406 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 - 0.67 0.67 - 0.67 0.67 1.00
C407 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C408 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
C409 3.00 - - 3.00 3.00 1.00 - - 3.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 1.00


C410 0.50 0.67 - 0.33 0.56 0.67 - - - 0.44 0.50 0.33 0.56 0.47
C411 2.00 1.22 1.33 - 0.67 - - - - - 2.00 0.67 1.67 0.78
C412 1.33 1.11 0.67 0.67 - 0.67 1.33 - 0.67 - - 0.67 1.78 1.33
C413 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
AVERAGE of
2.15 1.66 1.45 1.62 1.83 1.47 1.60 1.81 1.85 1.58 1.49 1.38 1.63 1.42
DA
80% OF DA 1.72 1.33 1.16 1.29 1.46 1.18 1.28 1.45 1.48 1.26 1.19 1.10 1.30 1.13
Average of
1.79 1.79 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.61 1.61 1.62 0.45 1.48 1.37 1.70 0.40 1.55
Activities
10%of Activity
0.18 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.04 0.15
chart attainment
Average of all
1.57 1.75 1.72 1.81 2.13 1.21 1.01 1.08 2.02 1.86 2.06 2.06 1.41 2.26
surveys
10% OF IDA(all
0.16 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.21 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.23
surveys)
80% OF DA 1.72 1.33 1.16 1.29 1.46 1.18 1.28 1.45 1.48 1.26 1.19 1.10 1.30 1.13
10%of Activity
chart 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.04 0.15
attainment
10% OF
IDA(all 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.21 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.23
surveys)
TOTAL 2.06 1.68 1.48 1.63 1.83 1.46 1.54 1.72 1.73 1.60 1.53 1.48 1.48 1.51

Figure 3.3.2 (b). Overall PO/PSO attainment 2013-2017 Batch

Batch 2014-2018
Table 3.3.2(c). Program Level CO-PO/PSO Consolidated Attainment Matrix by Direct (Student Performance) and Indirect (Surveys)
Courses PO1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO12 PSO 1 PSO2
C101 - - - - - - 3.00 - - - - - - -
C102 2.67 1.78 1.78 - - - - - - - - - 1.78 -
C103 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 - - - - - - 2.00 2.00 - -
C104 - - - 2.00 - - - - - - - - 3 -
C105 2.67 2.00 1.00 - - - - - - 1.17 - 1.17 2.00 1.00
C106 2.67 2.67 1.78 1.78 1.78 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.67 2.11
C107 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 1.00 1.00
C108 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 - -
C109 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - - -
C110 - - - - - - 3.00 - - - - - - -
C111 2.33 1.56 1.56 - - - 1.56 - 1.56 - - - 1.56 -
C112 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - - - 2.00 2.00 - -
C113 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - 3.00 -
C114 1.72 1.56 0.67 0.67 1.00 - - - 0.56 - - - - -
C115 3.00 2.17 1.17 1.17 0.60 0.67 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 2.00 1.00


C116 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
C117 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00
C201 3.00 2.17 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 -
C202 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 - 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 - - 0.33 0.61 0.67
C203 1.78 1.56 1.20 1.00 1.33 - - - - - - 0.67 1.56 1.78
C204 1.67 1.22 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 - 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.33 0.67
C205 2.17 1.44 0.72 0.72 1.33 1.33 1.33 - - - - 1.44 2.56 1.33
C206 1.94 1.87 1.87 - 2.00 - - - - - - 1.78 2.67 1.00
C207 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C208 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C209 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 - 3.00 2.00 2.00
C210 3.00 2.83 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C211 2.67 2.33 1.17 1.33 3.00 - - - 1.00 - 1.00 2.00 2.50 2.00
C212 1.83 1.22 0.72 0.78 0.67 0.67 0.67 - - - - 1.22 1.56 1.22
C213 2.83 1.67 - - 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 2.00 3.00
C214 - - - - - 0.67 1.50 - - 1.00 - 0.56 1.22 0.94


C215 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.33 - 1.00 - - 1.50 1.00 - 2.00 2.67 2.00
C216 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C217 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C218 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C301 3.00 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.33 - - - 2.17 1.33 1.33 1.17 2.17 2.00
C302 2.00 2.00 1.22 - 1.33 1.33 2.00 - 0.56 - - - 1.33 0.67
C303 2.00 1.33 1.33 0.67 2.00 - - - 1.33 1.33 - 1.33 1.33 2.00
C304 2.22 1.67 1.13 1.13 0.92 - 0.92 - - - - 0.93 1.72 1.33
C305 3.00 3.00 2.17 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.50 2.00
C306 - - - - 2.50 3.00 2.33 3.00 2.50 2.17 2.50 2.67 2.50 2.17
C307 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
C308 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
C309 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C310 2.00 1.33 0.67 0.67 2.00 0.67 0.67 - 0.67 - 0.67 0.67 1.33 0.67
C311 - - - - - 1.17 - 1.67 2.00 2.00 2.83 1.00 0.33 0.67
C312 3.00 1.00 - - - 2.00 2.00 - 1.00 - - - 3.00 2.00


C313 2.67 2.50 1.78 2.67 3.00 - - - 0.89 - 0.89 1.78 2.50 1.61
C314 2.83 2.50 1.56 1.56 3.00 - - - - - - - 1.72 1.28
C315 2.83 1.83 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - - 1.17 1.67 0.83
C316 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C317 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C318 - - 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
C401 3.00 1.83 1.40 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - 2.00 1.00 2.83 1.83
C402 2.17 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 - - - 1.00 2.67 2.33
C403 2.67 1.67 0.67 0.50 - 2.00 - - - - - 1.00 2.67 2.00
C404 2.00 1.67 - 2.00 1.67 1.00 3.00 - 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.83 2.00
C405 2.83 2.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 - - - 2.17 1.33 1.67 1.17 2.83 1.33
C406 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 3.00
C407 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C408 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
C409 3.00 - - 3.00 3.00 1.00 - - 3.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 1.00
C410 1.50 2.00 - 1.00 1.67 2.00 - - - 1.33 1.50 1.00 1.67 1.17


C411 3.00 1.83 2.00 - 1.00 - - - - - 3.00 1.00 2.67 2.00
C412 2.00 1.67 1.00 1.00 - 1.33 2.00 - 1.00 - - 1.00 2.50 1.17
C413 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
AVERAGE of
2.63 2.05 1.65 1.91 2.16 1.76 1.85 1.93 2.06 1.83 1.84 1.68 2.13 1.76
DA
80% OF DA 2.11 1.64 1.32 1.52 1.73 1.41 1.48 1.54 1.65 1.47 1.47 1.34 1.70 1.40
Average of
1.62 1.80 1.77 1.86 2.18 1.26 1.06 1.13 2.07 1.91 2.11 2.11 1.46 2.31
Activities
10%of Activity
0.16 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.21 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.23
chart attainment
Average of all
1.77 1.38 1.21 1.34 1.51 1.23 1.33 1.50 1.53 1.31 1.24 1.15 1.35 1.18
surveys
10% OF
IDA(all 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.12
surveys)
80% OF DA 2.11 1.64 1.32 1.52 1.73 1.41 1.48 1.54 1.65 1.47 1.47 1.34 1.70 1.40
10%of Activity
chart 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.21 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.23
attainment
10% OF
IDA(all 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.12
surveys)
TOTAL 2.45 1.96 1.62 1.84 2.10 1.66 1.72 1.81 2.01 1.79 1.81 1.67 1.98 1.75

Figure 3.3.2 (c). Overall PO/PSO attainment 2014-2018 Batch

COs attainment for all the courses is calculated for each semester. The consolidation of CO attainment is discussed in PAC meeting
through instructor reports. Similarly PO/PSO attainments are calculated for the outgoing batch of students in the respective year and the same is
discussed in MRM/DAC meetings for three batches to refine the threshold level. POs and PSOs attainment for the three batches of students are
shown in the Table 3.3.2.(d).

Velammal Institute of Technology
Table 3.3.2(d). Attainment of POs and PSOs for three batch of students
POs/PSOs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
Attainment
2.45 1.96 1.62 1.84 2.10 1.66 1.72 1.81 2.01 1.79 1.81 1.67 1.98 1.75
2014-18
Attainment
2.06 1.68 1.48 1.63 1.83 1.46 1.54 1.72 1.73 1.60 1.53 1.48 1.48 1.51
2013-17
Attainment
2.18 1.76 1.47 1.72 1.86 1.58 1.66 1.70 1.76 1.66 1.62 1.57 1.55 1.57
2012-16
NBA-SAR-TIER II

Criteria 3 - 21.11.2018 2.30pm PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Criteria 3 - 21.11.2018 2.30pm PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Velammal Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering

COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM 120

3. COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES

Program Outcomes (POs)

1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science,

2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze engineering

3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering

4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge

7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional

8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and

9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member

10. Communication: Communicate effectively with the engineering community and

11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of

PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES (PSOs)

Modernize/Automate/Adapt latest technology: (1) Graduates will be able to design,

Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6.

Process of framing Course outcomes:

 It is reviewed by Course coordinator and Module coordinator by referring the

 This is followed by submitting for approval to Head of the Department/Head of

Semester : IV Year of Study:2015-16

Semester : V Year of Study:2016-17

Semester : VI Year of Study:2016-17

Semester : VII Year of Study:2017-18

Semester : VIII Year of Study:2017-18

3.1.2 (a). CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be

Semester : IV Year of Study:2015-16

Semester : V Year of Study:2016-17

Semester : VI Year of Study:2016-17

Semester : VII Year of Study:2017-18

Semester : VIII Year of Study:2017-18

Table 3.1.3. Program Level CO-PO/PSO matrix for Regulation 2013

Courses PO1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2

C102 3.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - - 2.00 - - - 2.00 -

C103 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00

C105 2.67 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - 1.17 - 1.17 2.00 1.00

C112 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00

Courses PO1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2

C117 3.00 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00

C201 3.00 2.17 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 -

C206 2.17 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 - - - - - - 2.00 3.00 1.00

C213 2.83 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - - 2.00 2.00 3.00

Courses PO1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2

Courses PO1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2

C314 2.83 1.83 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - - 1.17 2.67 1.67

C403 2.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 - - - - - 1.00 2.67 2.00

Courses PO1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2

C411 3.00 1.83 2.00 - 1.00 - - - - - 3.00 1.00 2.50 1.17

Correlation levels 1,2,3 as define below

Figure 3.1.3. Program Level CO-PO/PSO mapping

Direct Assessment Methods

Laboratory Assessment is mainly to assess student’s practical

Direct Assessment Methods

Students are encouraged to do mini projects in second year, design and

CO Direct Assessment Methods

Every 2.5 to 3 Student’s performance

CO Indirect Assessment Methods

Figure 3.2.1 Evaluation of Course Outcome Attainment

 Internal Direct Assessment (IDA):- Marks secured in internal assessments, model

 Internal Indirect Assessment (IIA):- Consolidation of student exit survey on a

 External Assessment:- Marks secured in Anna University examination.

Table 3.2.2(a). Direct and Indirect Assessment Weightage

Internal Direct Assessment