Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to acknowledge other people’s perspectives and
hear new contexts around topics of discussion. In researching and debating the given topics,
students will be able to:
1. Synthesize and communicate information
2. Find, evaluate, and select credible research sources
3. Cite sources for both quoted and paraphrased sources within notes and the in-class
debate
4. Make sense of information gathered from diverse sources by identifying misconceptions,
main and supporting ideas, conflicting information, point of view or bias.
5. Participate in, collaborate in, and report on small-group learning activities and oral
presentation
6. Evaluate both one’s own role, and other people’s role, in preparation and delivery of oral
reports
7. Us a a variety of strategies to listen actively
8. Analyse and interpret other’s presentations and arguments
Debate Framework: Research will be submitted on Oct.24 (A) or Oct.25 (B) for teacher
evaluation of sources and information. On Oct.31 (A) or Nov.1 (B), your teacher will return a
copy of your research points at the start of your in-class debate. You will then have a 10-15
minute debate about your topic. If you are not debating, you will be sitting surrounding the
debaters (like a socratic seminar) and evaluating the debaters.
If you are debating, you will be sitting in the center of the room. Opposing sides will face each
other. Debate will begin with your teacher stating the topic. A coin flip will begin the debate. One
student will speak at a time. After a student on one side speaks, the other side will then
respond. To respond: students will rephrase the idea that the previous student said and then will
continue with their point. Students will use their research to support their argument for or against
the topic. A student should not speak again until two students have spoken on their own team.
Every student is expected to speak. The teacher will time the debate and give a warning with
two minutes left.
A. (5 points) Number of Claims – Did you complete your two claims? Do you have one
statement in support of the argument? Do you have one statement against the argument?
B. (5 points) Number of Sources - Did you include at least four sources? (Two for each
claim?)
C. (15 points) Quality of Quotes – Does your quote directly relate to your claim? Does it
not relate to your claim? Does your quote reveal a new idea about your claim? Is your
quote redundant? Do you have at least three quotes for each claim (six quotes total).
D. (15 points) Reliability of Source - Did you use Wikipedia? Does your source come from
a .gov or .edu website? Did you use a library database?
E. (10 points) MLA Citation - Did you properly cite your quotes following MLA format?
In more detail:
A. Number of claims: _________/ 5 points
No quotes 1-2 quotes present; 3-4 quotes present; 1- 5-6 quotes present; 6 quotes present; 3 for
quote(s) is not 2 for each claim, or 2-3 for each claim, each claim. Quotes are
relevant to claims some quotes may be or most quotes are relevant and fully
relevant, but do not relevant, and support claims
fully support claims support claims
1-8 pts
0 points 9-11 pts 12-14 pts 15 pts
No contribution; Repeats others’ Some original ideas Original ideas Original ideas
shows no comments, off- expressed that lack explored; usually explored; advanced
preparation topic, no text depth or follow- relies on text understanding of text;
support, shows through, seldom support, shows offers new approaches
poor prep supported by text adequate prep to text, shows
thorough prep
0 points 9-11 points
1-8 points 12-14 points 15 points
Self Reflection
1. What do you think you did best in terms of your preparation for and in the
debate?
2. What do you think you did best in terms of your participation in the
debate?
3. What do you believe you could have done better in your preparation or
participation in the debate?
4. How did you feel about the overall performance of the members of your
group? Did you work well together and share equally in the preparation
for the debate? Explain.
5. Was the opposing team successful in convincing you to change your mind?
Why or why not?
PEER/SELF EVALUATION
Content
and support)
Evidence:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
relevance)
Evidence:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Process
Evidence:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Evidence:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Evidence:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________