Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In this unit, you will learn to understand and apply responsible research methods and explore
available genres in which you may communicate your own research. Throughout this unit, you
will gather, evaluate, and interrogate sources, analyzing their genres, audiences and purposes.
You will examine the ways in which sources and researchers function in specific networked
environments.
Week 1
9/23 – 9/29
Forecasting Unit 2 | Learning to Locate and Use Intellectual Property Responsibly
Monday
Readings:
· The Video Proposal Assignment Sheet. (Homework due this day will be a list of
questions they might have about it.)
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· The students will be assigned sections of the Video Proposal Assignment Sheet in
Think-Pair-Share format (think individually, pair up to discuss how they might summarize
their section, share their section with the class).
· Whole Class Discussion: What about the Video Proposal examples seemed the
most effective? Which ones clearly expressed and communicated their purpose? Which
ones did not? Why? Did they address their audience effectively? How did these example
video proposals use ethos, pathos, and logos to enhance their use of imagery? How did
they use these rhetorical appeals verbally?
· Review the different methods of creating the Video Proposal with them (watch
Adobe Spark tutorial).
Wednesday
Readings:
· Becoming A College Writer, Chapter 24
· Plagiarism PDF
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Kahoot activity to review understanding of the readings on plagiarism.
· Mini Lecture: How to define plagiarism and avoid it. How to create/use citations in
MLA format and structure a works cited page.
· Using the Purdue OWL page on citations, show students how to crate a citation in
MLA format.
· Group Share: Summarize the key takeaways from the lecture. Give students three
sources and have them practice making citations in MLA format. Then, have them structure
it as a Works Cited page.
Readings:
· Boolean Searches PDF
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Library research day. Have student meet in a computer lab (or bring a laptop to
class), and have a librarian come teach students how to locate and use databases.
· Have students practice searching for sources relevant to their topic.
Week 2
9/30 – 10/6
Evaluating Source Credibility | Strong Responses, Summaries, and Paraphrasing | Double
Entry Notes
Monday
Readings:
· Becoming a College Writer, Chapter 12
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Free write reflection/recap of what they learned about gathering sources during the
library research day.
· Watch the Lesson 12 Essential Video.
· Mini Lecture on BEAM and CRAAP m
ethod for collecting sources.
· Group Activity: Create a Venn Diagram of the two methods.
· Whole Class Activity: Project a source up on the board. As a class, use the CRAAP
and/or BEAM method to analyze and evaluate the source.
Readings:
· Summary/Strong Response Format
· Paraphrasing, Summarizing, and Quoting (Monash University)
· How We Cite
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Minute Write: Consider the terms strong response, summary, and paraphrasing. How
would you define each?
· Whole Class Discussion: What is a summary? When do we use one? What is the
difference between paraphrasing and summarizing? When might we use paraphrasing in
our writing? What is a strong response? How might we use a strong response to evaluate a
source? How might we use it to strengthen our writing?
· Group Activity: Provide a source for students to analyze. Have them practice
composing paraphrasing, summarizing, and writing a strong response for the source.
· Writing Reflection Activity: How might learning about these three techniques for
analyzing a source help you become a better writer? How might you apply these three
techniques outside of a writing class? Consider, for instance, how these techniques might
help you in your field of study, or in your other classes. How might it help you with your
writing projects this term?
Readings:
· PDF on double entry research notes from Guide to Writing.
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Mini Lecture: Overview of what double entry notes are, and how to use them to
effectively engage with a possible research source. Explain how to compose a strong
response.
· Show a model of what double entry research notes should look like.
· Project a source on the screen, and have the whole class participate in composing
double entry research notes for that source.
Week 3
10/7 – 10/13
Identifying Claim and Audience | Tailoring Rhetorical Appeals and Media to an Audience |
Practicing Outlining Techniques
Monday
Readings:
· Audience
· Argument/Claim
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Minute Write: Identify the claim you will be making in your Video Proposal. Identify two
different imagined audiences for this claim as well. Why did you pick these audiences?
Propose different strategies can you use to effectively convince this audience?
· Class Discussion: How do we identify an audience when composing a piece of
writing? How can we use the rhetorical appeals to persuade an audience? Is every
audience persuaded by the same use of appeals? How might we tailor our use of appeals
for each audience?
· Project a source or two and have students identify the audience that each author
might be addressing.
Readings:
· Becoming a College Writer, Chapter 9
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Whole Class Activity: Project two websites on the same issue (i.e. gun control,
recycling, etc.) and lead a discussion with the class to answer the following questions:
o How do these websites use multimodal arguments (combinations of images, video,
audio, and text) to make their case/claim? What do you see as the rhetorical advantages of
using photographs, schematic drawings, graphics, etc? What rhetorical effect do you think
the web page designers were hoping to achieve for each of the sites?
o How do these web pages use logos, ethos, and pathos to sway readers toward their
point of view?
http://www.windustry.org/about
http://en.friends-against-wind.org/
· Group Activity: Show students one or two different video proposals (from previous
students) and have them analyze it to discuss the effectiveness of their rhetorical appeals.
Discuss how each student chose to identify and address their selected audience. Then,
have students look at examples of graphics. Review, as a class, how these uses were
ethical or unethical to demonstrate the proper use in their own video proposals.
· Visit from digital writing studio / review Adobe Spark tutorial.
· Multimodal Day Activity: Have students begin to search for rhetorically effective
images and media that can be used for their Video Proposal.
Readings:
· Outlines (the UNC Writing Center)
· Outlining by Shmoop
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Mini Lecture: Different outlining techniques that might help students visualize their
ideas, plan a script for their Video Proposals, and later forecast the outline of their
persuasive essays (the different outlining techniques will be added here at a later date).
· Individual Activity: Using one of the outlining techniques discussed in class, create
an outline of all the things you need to incorporate into your Video Proposal to make it
effective.
· Class Discussion: What is an attributive tag? When speaking, how do we “cite” our
sources? What are some of the ways we might reference a text/resource when presenting
information verbally?
· Group Activity: Give each group two different sets of resources. Have them use
attributive tags to briefly present their information to the rest of the class.
Week 4
10/14 – 10/20
Addressing Counterclaims | Understanding & Practicing Peer Reviewing Techniques |
Student Conferences
Monday
Readings:
· Conducting Peer Reviews
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Whole Class Discussion: What is peer review? What type of feedback would you
consider effective? What type of feedback would you consider unhelpful?
· Watch the video No One Writes Alone
· Group Activity: Look at the following resource for a model of peer review guiding
questions. Temple University Peer Review Questions. Then, compose a list of guiding
questions that can be used for the in-class peer review of the Video Proposals next class.
· Whole Class Google Doc Activity: Ask each group to share the guiding questions
they created. Post this list to Canvas for students to consult while doing in-class peer
review during Wednesday’s class.
Readings:
· Review the Google Doc of Peer Review guiding questions.
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Group Activity: In-class peer review rotations of the Video Proposal First Draft. Have
students pick a partner to do peer review with. Once time is up, they switch to another
partner. Repeat this so that each student gets to have three separate peer review note sets
from their classmates. The instructor will go around mediating the different peer review
sessions, offering advice.
· Whole Class Discussion: What is the importance of the peer reviewing we did in
class today? Is the feedback you received today helpful towards your goal of revising your
Video Proposals? Discuss with students the importance of feedback and how it helps us
revise our work. This will help them understand writing as a process.
· Give a brief explanation of instructor expectations for the Video Proposal
conferences.
Readings:
· None.
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Conduct Student Conferences
· Create a plan for revision. Use the Video Proposal assignment sheet and rubric to
point out the strengths and weaknesses of the Video Proposal thus far.
Week 5
10/21 – 10/27
Understanding Revision | Recaps and Reflection
Monday
Readings:
· The Difference Between Proofreading, Editing, and Revising
· Revising Drafts
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· he Difference Between Proofreading, Editing, and Revising
Mini Lecture: T
· Whole Class Activity: Putting up a Google Doc with three columns labeled:
Proofreading, Editing, and Revising. Have students summarize key factors they learned
from the mini lecture which help them identify the differences of each category.
· Mini-Lecture: Go over the process of Revising Drafts.
· Partner Activity: Have students sit with a partner to peer review each other’s
Conference Draft of the Video Proposal. Devote the last 8-10 minutes of class on this.
Readings:
· Review all the readings from this unit.
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Minute Write Activity: Ask students to reflect on the Video Proposal project. What
aspect of creating the Video Proposal was the most difficult? Consider all the research/work
that went into it. You may also talk about any difficulties you had with the technical aspects
of it. What should have been done differently?
· Group Activity: Work on creating presentations.
o In groups of 3-4 students, assign each group a major concept/skill from the unit:
topic/claim invention; collecting/locating sources; strong responses to sources; addressing
counterclaims; audience; outlining.
o Have students demonstrate their understanding of the concepts by working on a brief
presentation that summarizes the most essential elements of that skill. As they create their
presentation, have them consider:
§ How would they summarize the most essential elements of that lesson to a student who
missed that class?
§ What about each of these lessons might be helpful to remember when working on other
writing projects?
o These presentations should effectively serve as a major takeaways outline of all the
skills they have learned in this unit in order to become better writers.
Homework Due:
· Finish revising your Video Proposals.
Friday
Readings:
· Review all the readings from this unit.
In-Class Activities/Plan:
· Mini presentations of each group’s concept/skill.
· Free Write Activity: Ask students to reflect on the concepts covered during Unit 2. How
have the skills covered in this unit helped them to become better writers? What did they
learn about themselves as writers, or about writing in general, by composing this video
proposal? What did researching and writing about this subject teach them? Did they
change their mind or come to see something differently as a result of composing this work?