FRM/EDPD/382

CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL

CARIBBEAN ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION®
MODERATION FEEDBACK REPORT ON SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY UNIT 2
CENTRE CODE: NAME OF CENTRE: YEAR OF EXAMINATION:

NAME OF TEACHER:

ADMINISTRATION AND SUBMISSION OF SAMPLES COMPLIANCE WITH SYLLABUS SPECIFICATIONS QUALITY OF CANDIDATE’S SUBMISSIONS
Project Activity Record Books
Yes No These contained: Yes No Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
1. the statement of need, problem definition or purpose of
1. Were projects selected from CXC’s list? 1. The overall quality of the work in
the experiment;
the Project Activity Record Books
2. Was Form EET - 5, Project Coversheet, attached to the
2. the approach or method statement; and Final written reports was
work of EACH candidate in the sample?
3. Was a completed Record of Marks for Internal
3. sketches, diagrams and pictures; 2. The Project Activity Record Book
Assessment submitted?
and written reports showed
4. Were marks awarded in keeping with CXC’s marking sufficient evidence of candidates
4. the design process, lab procedures and calculations;
guidelines? individual work

5. Was the sample selected in accordance with CXC’s 5. resources including tools and equipment and components 3. Syllabus coverage: Project work
instructions? used; shoed evidence of knowledge,
topics, concepts, skills and
6. Were candidates’ details (Names, Registration procedures contained in at lease two
6. specifications;
Number) correctly recorded? Modules within the Unit
7. Was a project report submitted for EACH candidate in
7. problems, constraints, difficulties and limitations;
the sample?
8. Was a Project Activity Record Book submitted for
8. tests and trouble shooting procedures and results.
EACH candidate in the sample?
QUALITY OF TEACHER’S MARKING The Final Written Report Yes No GENERAL COMMENTS
These include:
The teacher’s marking was, in general:
1. the report purpose;
Acceptable
2. statement of need, problem definition, or purpose of the
experiment;
Severe
3. project scope and specifications;
4. methodology or approach;
Lenient
5. design and construction details;
6. summary of tests and troubleshooting procedures;
Inconsistent
7. testing and troubleshooting results.
Moderator’s Initials: Date: Chief/Assistant Chief Examiner’s Initials: Date:
Revised September 2013