Corinne Bohnel
English 015 – Rhetoric and Composition
Professor De Piero
5 December 2018
WP1 Original Reverse Outline
Paragraph # Main Idea/Summary
1 The conventions of critic reviews
and an explanation of what makes
them different than public reviews.
2 Certain conventions used in movie
reviews is for the audiences’
benefit; all they have to look at is a
percentage to see how good the
movie was.
3 The formal jargon of the review
establishes the main difference
between public reviews and critic
reviews.
4 If movies aren't well known, people
aren't going to spend time writing
reviews on them because people are
most likely not even watching the
movies.
5 The length of the review establishes
the main difference between public
reviews and critic reviews.
6 The tone of the review typically
demonstrates whether the person
writing the review enjoyed the film
or not.
7 Short conclusion and the
conventions that are used for movie
reviews.
How It Supports My Argument/
Changes (if needed)
Introducing the main argument of
my paper. Going to add in how
jargon effects the different reviews
specifically. Main Argument: There
is a common pattern in professional
reviews that distinguishes them
from everyday fan reviews.
Going to mention specifically that
this type of convention relates to
critic evalutions, and not fan
reviews. Also going to delete extra
information that does not support
my argument.
Supports main argument that critic
reviews go more in depth in
comparison to public reviews.
Going to make this paragraph the
last, because it is the strongest or
the “dessert.”
This DOES NOT support my main
argument. Going to cut this out
completely. Also, I have no
evidence that this is even true…
This supports my main argument
saying critic reviews are more
trustworthy.
Going to keep this but compare the
different tones of the critic reviews
and fan reviews.
Closing to what the argument was
but going to wrap it up more by
talking about what was mentioned
in the main argument paragraphs.