Evidence found in the Peter Sully Case

Peter Gerard Scully is found guilty of human trafficking and rape for using children below 12
years old – including a one-year-old – in his cybersex operations.
A regional trial court in Cagayan de Oro City declared Australian national Peter Gerard Scully
guilty sexually abusing young children in Mindanao and uploading videos for clients in Europe.
Their syndicate engaged in cybersex operations, using children below 12 years old – including a
one-year-old. The following are evidences to prove such crime:
a. Six of the cases involve two minors – Daisy and Queenie – who were lured by Scully and
Alvarez. Daisy and Queenie were abused by Scully, who made them dig their own graves.
The hostilities against the children spanned a week.
b. According to testimonies of 45 witnesses, the sexual abuses were filmed and uploaded on
exclusive pornography websites, with payments collected from the viewers through money
transfer.
c. The snuff videos created by Scully have been viewed by the Australian and Filipino police,
and no one else. The detectives managed to track Scully down thanks to his Aussie accent
and other clues left on the tapes. The public has never been given access to the films, and
that is certainly for the best. No good could ever come from seeing something like that.
d. “Scully and his partners produced films not just of young girls performing sexual acts but
also of young girls being tortured and sexually assaulted — or whatever it is their client
demands online. There were no limits to what they allow these young girls to do,” Eric
Nuqui, head of the NBI Anti-Human Trafficking Division (Ahtrad), told the Inquirer.
e. NBI’s director for Northern Mindanao, Angelito Magno, led a team of operatives on
Wednesday, February 25, to recover the bones of the 10-year-old girl in Villa Corito
Subdivision, Barangay Washington, in Surigao City, Surigao del Norte. Police dig up the
floor of a house where Scully allegedly buried children he had raped.
It is noteworthy to say that concerns before, however, were raised on whether or not the cases will
prosper without any physical evidence:
a. The most of the physical evidence against him, including a computer, video camera and
memory card, had been destroyed in a fire that razed the Cagayan de Oro Hall of Justice
on January 30, 2015, three weeks before Scully’s arrest.
b. Authorities got hold of the physical evidence against him when they earlier raided his
residence in Apovel Subdivision, Cagayan de Oro City, in Sept. 2014.
c. Another live-in partner of Scully, Carme Ann “Angel” Alvarez, was arrested in that
operation.
d. The prosecution should do its best to prove Scully’s guilt “beyond reasonable doubt”
otherwise the alleged pedophile will soon find himself free again.
 e. “There’s a great possibility that the cases against Scully will be dismissed due to the fact
that the physical evidence against him were burned down. Those things are necessary to
prove that Scully really had a hand in molesting and torturing the victims,” the veteran
lawyer said.
f. “The prosecution should handle the case properly. If Scully gets a good lawyer, there’s
really the chance that he can go out of prison,” he added.
Even behind bars, Peter Gerard Scully, the notorious alleged sex predator who brutally sodomized
children in Mindanao, continues to communicate with the outside world. Evidences are as follows:
a. A number of phone calls and text messages between Scully and Margallo were discovered
by the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) even after the Australian national was
arrested in Malaybalay, Bukidnon, in February 2015.
b. Margallo’s cell phone was confiscated by NBI agents when they finally caught up with the
fugitive on Malapascua Island in the northern part of Cebu.
c. Margallo’s cell phone and laptop will be subjected to forensic examination by the NBI.
d. The NBI is on a quandary as to how Scully managed to contact Margallo when inmates are
supposedly prohibited from possessing cell phones inside the jail.
With regards to protecting the victims, according to the latest news that we have regarding the
evidences of such case:
The PNP-ACCG reiterated that the videos produced by Scully are under Special Protection
Order and anyone found to have it in their possession and sharing it can and will be prosecuted.
The possession and circulation of pictures and video such as those produced by Scully is
against the law and constituted a punishable offense under Republic Act 9775 or the Anti-Child
Pornography Act of 2009.
Bantay KASO (Kagay-anons Against Sexual Offenders), a network of NGOs who kept
close watch during the trials, called on Facebook to strictly enforce the protection order and report
any online accounts found to share said videos and photos to the authorities.
“While we celebrate the conviction, we should not be complacent, this case should tell us
parents, teachers and all that we are the first line of defense in protecting children from online
predators and exploiters,” Atty Perfecto Mendoza, head of Bantay KASO said.