Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
l2sEmxE
Page
CONTENTS (continued)
Page
TABLES
*Only those checklists applicable to this specific system design were used. Other designs may require use of
all checklists .
FlGURES
Page
PEClFlCATlON WORKSHEETS
Aidlent ,
- .
INTRODUCTION
An example solar energy system design was prepared following the guidelines of the design manual. The
example is intended to show how the equations, tables, figures, checklists, worksheets, and evaluations are
used in the solar energy system design process.
The system selected for the example application is a closed-loop antifreeze system that can be used to
supplement heating of service water for a dormitory. The example system uses flat plate collectors that are
mounted on the roof of the dormitory.
Numbers used to identify sections, headings, tables, figures, checklists, and worksheets for the example are
directly relatedto those used in the main text of the design manual.
The example solar energy system design was performed using the inch-pound (I-P) units and symbols.
SECTION 1
CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS
1.2 Owner/Archltect/EnglneerConference
The "owner" is a college in Tucson, Arizona, that is considering a solar energy system to supplement the
service hot water load in a men's dormitory. Checklist 1-1 summarizes the owner's goals.
Ideally, either historical records of service hot water usage or real-time data collection would be used to
estimate the service hot water load. In this example, these methods were not available for use. The load is
estimated based on the ASHRAE 1980 Systems Handbook guidelines for hot water demand (Table 6 of the
Service Water Heating section).
The dormitory contains 100 rooms, 25 per floor, and there are three students per room. The school is on the
trimester system with about h2lf the capacity during the summer trimester (Mayto August). The hot water
load, by month, is determined below using the equation from Worksheet 1-1. The average hot water demand
is 13.1 gavstudent per day.
A sketch of the dormitory building is illustrated by Figure A. Checklists 1-4 and 1-5 outline the results of the
building site survey.
Due to the relatively large static head, approximately 50 ft, and the freeze potential at the site, the conceptual
system selected for this site is a closed-loop antifreeze system, as illustrated by Figure 1-3 of the manual. 4
The expected performance of the system, for both an average flat plate and an average evacuated tube
collector, can be found in Table 1-3 of the manual.
The estimated required array, storage, and mechanical room sizes are calculated per Section 1.5.1 as
follows.
a. Array area = (806 x 1 0 % ~ x 0.80) + (269,000 Btu/ft2eyr)@ 2400 ft2 (flat plate)
The cost estimate will be based on the assumption that flat plate collectors will be used. The sytem cost
range is estimated as follows.
A representative 40-ft2flat plate collector can currently be purchased for $520. This represents less than 30%
of the system cost and is acceptable.
13 . 3 Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness
The simple payback period can be calculated following the steps in Section 1.5.3.
d. The simple payback periods for both the minimum and maximum cost estimate are
The payback periods are within the owner's goal of 15 years. The allowable first cost can be calculated
following the steps in Section 1.5.3.
f. From Table 5, using an interest rate of 12% (estimated over the life of the system, an
economic life of 20 years and a fuel price change of +2.50/dyr, the economic factor is 8.956.
This is in between the minimum and maximum cost estimates of the system. The system will be cost-effec-
tive if it can be installed for this amount or less.
Basement
Entrance
Roof Plan
Floor Plan
Ground Level
Furnace
, ~ . ~ C r . ~ . c c , r r r . r r Storage
1
*r &
: Sohr ; Workspace
Existing j Equipment
Water R o o m :
i
Heater d
1 #I
S o b Design Manual
Example System Design Conceptual Analysis- Page EX-5
CHECKLIST 1-1
Hot water only -X-Space heating Space heating and hot water
3. Temperature 12OP0F
4. Load profile (list monthly hot water load estimates) (gallons): (000 omitted)
Jan -122- Feb 1 1 0 - Mar -122- Apr -1 18- May - 6 1 Jun -59-
J u l - 6 1 A u g 6 1 S e p ~ 1 1 8 O c t ~ 1 2 2 ~ N o v Dec-122-
~118~
CHECKLIST 1-4
BUIL1)ING 1NFORMATlON
3. Utilities available:
Solar D e s i ~ nManual
CHECKLIST 1-5
Provide sketch showing shape, overall dimensions, and location and type of any
obstructions or potential shading sources.
SECTION 2
FEASIBILITY STUDY
Checklists 2-1 through 2-4 are filled out as attached. The only conservation measure is to lower the tank set
temperature to 120°F.
The ASHRAE data for hot water usage calculated in Section 1 still applies.
The example system simulation program chosen for this example feasibility study is F-CHART version 5.5.
The initial input required to run F-CHART 5.5 is determined using Appendix 2B and the F-CHART user's
manual.
As a first cut, 54 collectors are estimated. This is an area, 10% less than that calculated in
Section 1.
3. FRUL= 0.792; this is the value for an average flat plate collector as shown in Section 1.5.
4. F,m = 0.61 6; this is the value for an average flat plate collector as shown in Section 1.5.
5. Collector slope = 32". For this first run, this is set to the site latitude.
7. Incidence angle modifier = 8, for the program to calculate the modifier values.
8. Number of glazings = 1.
Daily hot water usage; the monthly values are input by typing "7 V"
City water temperature; the monthly values are input by typing '9 Vw
UA of auxiliary storage tank = 23.8 Btu/hm°F; the auxiliary tank is 1070 gallons. 4.5
diameter, and 9 ft high. The installed insulation is 2.5 inches thick with a k = 0.031
17. Tank side flow rate = 18.375 Ib/hr*ft2;calculated as 5% greater than collector side flow rate
Tucson, AZ
Jan
Feb
Mar
AP~
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
S ~ P
Oct
Nov
Dec
Yr i J
The results show that with 54 collectors, the solar fraction will be 0.79, meeting 100% of the load during the
months of May through August.
Assuming that the example simulation program overestimates the output by 20%, the installed performance
can be estimated by:
= 348.1 MMBtu
Following the guidelines of Appendix 2C (Casts are expressed in 1985 U.S. dollars and must be adju
the year of proposed construction):
-
BC 7.05 (2,160 ft2) + 5,337 =-$
3. Electrical Material
BC = 0.134 (2,160 ft2) + 2,432 = $9.771
4. Mechanical Labor
5. Electrical Labor
BC = 0.026 (2,160 ft2) + 1,550 = $1.608
6. Other
Total Cost
Cost/ft2 ~$59.71
/ft2
The system is evaluated economically by looking at the total life cycle costs (TLCC) of the existing system
and of the solar retrofit system. The two TLCCs are assumed to be:
No tax credits or salvage value is included in this example, and the design cost is exduded. Also, the existing
system is assumed to last as long as the solar energy system.
To convert the annual auxiliary fuel and O&M costs to a present value, the modified uniform present worth
(MUPW) formula is utilized as follows:
(Note: Table 5 of Section 1 can be used, also.)
+ e)/(d- e)] [I
MUPW = A. [(i - ((1 + e)/(i + d)IN]
where: A, = annual cost at beginning of study period ($/yr)
e = annual energy escalation rate (decimal)
d -- annual discount rate (decimal)
N = study period, yr
The annual auxiliary fuel cost is determined from the F-CHART run.
The annual operating costs are assumed to be 5% of the solar energy collected, or:
As can be seen from Table 1, the TLCC with the solar energy system is much greater than the TLCC without
a system. Therefore, some optimization is required.
The first step in optimization is to maximize the output of the system. The second step is to reduce the array
area and, therefore, the system cost until the TLCC, with solar, is less than the TLCC without solar.
Since the maximum load exists during the winter months, the system output can be increased by increasing
the collector slope. This results in an optimum slope of 42", with the corresponding F-CHART run shown
below.
Tucson, AZ
- - - -
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap r
May
Jun
Jul
Aw
S~P
Oct
Nov
Dec
Yr
-
Table 2 Results of F-CHART Runs for Varlety of Array Sizes
20% Reduction
In F-CHART Output
Number
of Panels Solar MMBtu Aux MMBtu F Aux MMBtu F
The first cut at the economic evaluation assumes that the installation cost remains $59.711ft2. Table 3
summarizes the results of the TLCCs for the various system sizes.
-
Table 3 Results of TLCC Calculations for Various Solar Energy System Sizes
As can be seen, none of the systems have a lower TLCC than the existing nonsolar water heater.
To complete this example, Table 4 summarizes a second economic evaluation with an assumed
electrical energy cost of $39.84/MMBtu.
'These values are based on the cost estimating procedures of Section 2 instead of the assumed cost
of $59.71 /ft2.
Using the assumed installation cost of $59.71/ft2,the installation is economical from approximately 35 panels
down to at least 20 panels. Using the installation cost estimating procedure outlined in Section 2, the TLCC
bottoms out at 40 panels and at that level is approximately $30,000 more than the TLCC without a solar
energy system. This example solar system will be designed using 40 panels.
Solar D e s i ~ nManual
Example System Design Feasibility Study- Page EX-1 7
CHECKLIST 2-2
BUILDING INFORMATION
(Sheet 1 of 4)
Date July 1987
Number of floors: 4
TOTAL ft2
Door types and number:
north single vestibule revolving - -doors
west -single vestibule revolving = -doors
east -single vestibule revolving = -doors
south -single vestibule revolving = -doors
Gross wall area: north
BUILDING INFORMATION
"U"Value
20.' Net wall area: north ft2 (Net E gross less window
and door area)
21. Net wall area: west ft2
TOTAL ft2
Surface material
"U"Value
25. Floor:
"U"Value
b. Number of occupants: -300- occupants (for offices, employees and visitors; for stores,
employees and customers; for religious buildings, schools only count occupants)
27. Number of custodial hours per week: after dark, summer -N/A- hours
CHECKLIST 2-2
BUILDING INFORMATION
(Sheet 3 of 4)
-
a. heated winter Occupied hours O F % RH
Unoccupied hours OF % RH
-
b. air-conditioned summer Occupied hours O F % RH
Unoccupied hours O F % RH
30. Type and location of space heating equipment: Single unit Multiple units
Boosters
-OutsrdeJocati~
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
-Inside, location
Type and location of water heating equipment: X Single unit Multiple units
-Outside, location
-X- Inside, locatian -Basement
31. Utilities available
BUILDING INFORMATION
Provide sketch showing shape and overall dimensions of collector location with
location and type of any obstructions or potential shading sources.
c. Mechanicalequipmentlocation-IndoorXOutdoor
CHECKLIST 2-3
(Sheet 1 of 2)
Building location T u c s o n - (City), -Arizona-(State)
Local population
6. Long-term climatic condition (as available: use NWS data or SERl Atlas')
CHECKLIST 2-4
INFILTRATION
--;-
CHECKLIST 2 4
- -
As
To be
Implemented
Yes&
UTILITY PLANT DISTRIBUIIONSYSTEMS (Continued)
CHECKLIST 2-4
ENERGYCONSERVATIONMEASURES
(Sheet 3 of 4)
To be
Implemented
YssNa
HVAC (Continued)
InstalFeG6noflzer - - - - - - - -
BUILDING ENVELOPE
Implemented
Yes&
LAUNDRY
KITCHEN
SERVICE WATER
lnstall local boost heater(s) for 140 to 180°F water in lieu of raising
heater set temperature.
MISCELLANEOUS
CHECKLIST 2-5
-
Use Rate Mostly constant
Variable (--I
(-
-
O ~ p tom - 2 O a p m )
gpm),
SECTION 3
DETAILED DESIGN
From Table 3-1, Figures 3-2 and 3-6are selected as the coltector subsystem and interface subsystem
schematics, respectively. From Table 3-10, Figure 3-31 is used to determine the controls components.
Figures 3-38, 3-39,and 3-40are used to determine the performance instrumentation components.
Figure B illustrates the Example System P&ID.
a. The collector type is a flat plate, single-glazed coliector with internal manifolds
b. The collector size is 40 ft2 and the estimated number of collectors required is 40 panels
c. The collector tilt and orientation are to be 42" and 0° of true south, respectively. The 42" tilt was
determined by the example simulation program, and the 0' of true south is used because the
b
1. The collectors should be mounted to one side of the elevator equipment structure on the roof.
The available width is approximately 150 ft. Using the suggestion in the manual for using 8
collectors to a bank, the required space per bank would be as illustrated by Figure C .
At 38 ftlbank, five banks will not fit to one side of the elevator equipment structure. Therefore,
to make two symmetrical rows of collectors, the design will be modified to contain 6 banks of
7 collectors each, for a total of 42 collectors.
2. Shading Calculation
Using the shading calculation methodology in Section 3.3.1.4, the minimum spacing distance
between rows is calculated as follows:
e. Structural analysis and design is left for a structural engineer to do. The collectors will be roof
mounted, attached to a rack recommended by the collector manufacturer. The rack will be
supported on columns, penetrating the roof membrane, attached to I-beams in the roof structure.
The rack should be a minimum of 2 ft above the finished roof membrane. The collector weight is
120 Ib/collector. The fluid weight is estimated as:
Weight of 2-in. average copper pipe is: 21 lbl20 ft x 200 ft = 210 lb of copper pipe
Therefore, the dead weight on the roof, excluding the supporl structure, is estimated to be:
The support structure must be designed to withstand 100-mph winds and support the collectors at
a 42' slope angle.
The pipe size for the collector loop is determined based on the recommended maximum velocity
of 4 to 6 ftlsec. Using the flow data from Table 3-5, Figure E illustrates the estimated volumetric
flow rates throughout the collector loop and the pipe sizes. The collector manufacturer recorn-
mends a flow rate of 2.5 gpm per collector.
The typical collector bank piping arrangement is illustrated by Figure F. The entire array is
plumbed in reverse return as shown in Figure E.
Pipe support shall be provided by the collector rack as shown in Figure G. Pipjng inside the
building should be supported in the same manner that the existing piping is supported.
Calculation of piping head loss. The head losses for the various components are listed below.
Table 3-5 was used to find the pressure drop of 150°F 50/50 propylene glycol.
Commnent Quantitv Pressure Drao (mil
The component specification sheets are attached. The calculations for the pump and expansion tank are
outlined below.
3. . NPSH allowable = 47.7 - 3 - 2 = 42.7 psia = 98.21 ft (Note: The fluid velocity head is
considered negligible)
Based on the requirements discussed in Section 3.3.3.4, the 3500 tpm pump speed provides the
allowable specific speed (N,) closest to 2500 rprn.
COLD WATER
--
PI Air
/
Separator H4
Fill & Drain
P2
tines
t
North Roof Plan (Not to Scale)
2"/'
52.5 gpm
) gpmq
(7.5 ~ P ~ ( T Y P ) 35 ~ P ~ C T Y P 105 I
Array
Flgure E. Collector Pipe Sizes and Flow Rates supply
Flexible
Coupling q
-4- Bank Supply (TYP)
Figure F. Typical Collector Bank Piping
Location of
314" Female NPT Ports
Top & Bottom (Typ)
e
+ 6b+ Male N m 6q
9'
e
b
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Flat Plate Liquid Collectors
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 3
Item Requirement
General Data
Design Life:
Warranty:
Absorber Plate
Material: -Copper
Flow Pattern: ( i a , series, parallel) -Parallel
Manifold: (i.e., internal or external size) -Internal
Maximum Operating Pressure: 150 psig
i SPEC1FlCATlON WORKSHEET
Flat Plate Liquid Collectors
'i
/ Designer Owner Date
Project Page 2 of 3
I
Requirement
Cover Glazing
Impact Resistance:
Collector Casing
insulation
f SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
\
Flat Plate Liquid Collectors
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 3 of 3
Item Requirement
Certifications: -SRRC
SRCC Approvals: Yes
Mounting Requirements
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Heat Transfer Fluids
) Designer Owner Date
I Project Page 1 of 1
Item Requirement
Special Additives: - - - - - -
GuaranteeNarranty:
Shutoff:
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Pumps
Designer Owner Date
I Project Page 2 of 2 I
Item Requirement
Ambient Temperature:
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Expansion Tanks
Item Requirement
Warranty: 1 Yr
SPEClFlCATlON WORKSHEET
Air Separator Valve
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
Item Requirement
Project Page1 of 1 I
Cycles to Failure:
Warranty:
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Insulation
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
Requirement
Code Requirements:
Warranty: 1 Yr
Requirement
Warranty:
I Project I
Requirement
SPECiFICATION WORKSHEET
Pressure Relief Valves
Project Page 1 of 1 I
\
Requirement
Code Requirements:
Warranty:
-
PRVs at collectors 6 each at 25 psig setting, 20 psig working pressure
-
PRVs at heat exchanger 1 each at 75 psig setting, 50 psig working pressure
SPEC1FlCATlQN WORKSHEET
Piping
>
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1 ,
item Requirement
-
3 inch 250 ft Type L-
-
2 inch - 85 ft Type L
-
1 1/4 inch 80 ft Type L -
lettical tank will be designed. Typically vertical tanks have a length-to-diameter ratio of 3. The dimensions
the tank can be determined as follows:
\isis taller than the space available, but a diameter of 6 ft will provide a height of 9 it, which is acceptable.
eref fore, the storage tank will be 6 ft D x 9 ft H and will have four nozzles located as illustrated by Figure H.
b. The pipe size from the heat exchanger to the tank is determined based on the recommended
maximum velocity of 4 - 6 Ws. The required volumetric flowrate from Section 3.4.2 is calculated
as follows:
),g
n
p
(,r (62.1b/ft3)(1 Btu/lb*OF)> (1.05) (105 gpm) (64.27 lblft3)(0.866 Btu/Ib*OF)
From Table 3-2A, the pipe diameter should be 3 inches. The pipe size from the solar storage
tank to the existing storage tank is based on existing line sizes which are 2 inch copper Type L.
The head losses for the various components in the collector/storage subsystem interface are:
'olarDesign Manual
Example System Design Detailed Design- Page EX-5j
The component specification sheets are attached. Additional information regarding the components is
discussed as follows:
a. Storage Tank
In addition to the specification sheets, Figure I is required to complete the tank specification.
b. ,Heat Exchanger
A plate heat exchanger will be utilized. Using the procedure outlined in Section 3.4.3.2:
1. Effectiveness = 0.7
Glycol
= 248 ft of water
2. Pumpspeed
The recommended operational controls schematic is illustrated by Figure 3-31 as determined from
Table 3-10. The collector sensor and thermal switches will be located as illustrated by Figure J.
The operational monitoring instrumentationconsists of temperature gauges, pressure gauges, and pressure/
temperature ports. These are located as illustrated by the PBID, Figure B. The pressureltemperatureports
will be installed within a few feet of each temperature gauge.
I A I
South T
Array
Return
f Valve
'Array \Spare
Outlet Return Well
Left Side! Front Riaht Side
w w w
>
Spare Cold Water Drain
Well T - Gage Array
S1 Valve
WP~Y
0
' 0 \0 d o '
.
Figure K. Storage Tank Sensor Locations
Project Page 1 of 2 *
Item
Material: Steel
Code Requirements:
Connection Types and Sizes: 3 inch NPT, male & 3/4 inch NPT, female
Manhole: No
Baffles: No
Warranty:
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Heat Exchangers
Designer Owner Date
1
Project Page 1 of 2
Requirement
.imitations: -None
>odeRequirements: ASME
>onnectionSizes and Types: i.e., 2-in. (51 mm) flanged -3 inch flanged
system Interface Materiat: (i.e., copper tubing, etc.) -Copper Type L
service Life: (casing materials) -20 yr
Mounting Requirements: (i.e., floor, wall, etc.) Floor
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Heat Exchangers
Designer Owner Date
Requirement
Project Page 1 of 2
Requirement
Shutoff: -25 ft
Loop Max. Operating Pressure: -125 psig
Availabfe NPSH: 108 psia
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Pumps
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 2 of 2
Requirement
Warranty:
Project Page 1 of 1
Item Requirement
Code Requirements:
Warranty:
Page 1 of 1
Project
Requirement
Warranty:
Insulation
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
Item Requirement
Material: Polyisacyanurate
Code Requirements:
Weatherproofing/Jacketing: None
Warranty: 1 Yr
I Project Page 1 of 1 I
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Check Valves
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
ltem Requirement
Application: DHW heating
Code Requirements:
MinimumIMaxirnum Temperature:
f SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
'i
Pressure Relief Valves
I Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
Requirement
Warranty:
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Piping
Project Page 1 of I
Item Requirement
Material: -Copper
Size and Type or Schedule: 3 inch Type 1
Solar D e s i ~ nManual
Exam~leSvstem Design Detailed Design- Page EX-66
SPEClFlCATlON WORKSHEET
Differential Temperature Controller
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
Requirement
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Temperature Switches
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
Requirement
Type: (NC, NO, DP, ST, DT) -As shown on electrical schematic-
Temperature Set Point Range: -As shown on electrical schematic-
Switch Contact Rating:
Number of Contacts: 1
Construction: -Copper
Warranty: 5 Yr
Requirement
Accuracy: *2 O F
Warranty: -5 Yr
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Btu Meters
Project Page 1 of 2 I
Item Requlrernent
Application: DHW heating
Type: Electronic
#1 #2 #3
Peak Flow:
Minimum Flow:
Project Page 2 of 2
Item Requirement 1
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
PressureRemperature Ports
Designer Owner Date
Project Page 1 of 1
Item Requirement
SPECIFICATION WORKSHEET
Pressure Gauges
Item Requirement
Application: -DHW heating
Pressure Range: (max.) -250 psig
Operating Pressure Range: 0 to 250 psig
- -
Project Page 1 of 1
Requirement
Application: 7
DHW heating
Accuracy: -f 5%
Stern Length: -As required
Fluid Compatibility: -N/A
Warranty: 5 Yr
3.9 PerformancelCostVerification
Ideally, a sophisticated simulation computer program would be used to determine the performance of the de-
signed system. For this example, the example simulation program used in Section 2.3.1 will be used. The
inputs for the program are fisted as foilows.
Note:
*Daily hot water usage; the monthly values are input by typing "7V"
Jan
Feb
Mar
AP~
May
Jun
Jut
Aug
S ~ P
Oct
Nov
Dec
Yr
The attached tables show the estimated cost for the example, expressed in 1985 U.S. dollars. The
costs must be adjusted to the year of proposed construction. The system cost is:
Material = $44,452.00
Labor = 14,861.00
Freight = 1,290.00
Work Comp (5.29%) = 776.00
Soc. Sec. (7.05%) = 1,034.00
Unempl. Tax (1%) = 147.00
Sales Tax (7%) = 3.lf2.00
Subtotal $65 ,472.00
Contingency (5%) =
G & A (I Oa/o) =
Profit (10%) =
Bonds & Permits (1%) =
Liability t nsurance (1%) =
Subtotal
Total iiu&&!u
The design cost estimate detail is listed in Table 5.
The installed performance for the Detail Design run is estimated to be:
Assuming the electrical energy cost of $39.84/MMBtu, the TLCC with solar is:
When this cost is compared with the TLCC without solar of $189,723, the design is seen to be cost-
effective.
--
-
Table 5 Design Cost Estimate Detail
Description Quantity Unit Materials Labor Total
Coltectors 42 each
Collector supports $2140
Crane 4 hours 90
Tank ( I 680 gallon) 1 each 31 6
Crane 2 hours 90
Piping
3 in., Cu L 300 feet 10.65
2 in., Cu L 115 feet 7.70
1 1/4 in., Cu L 80 feet 5.75
Ets
3 in., Cu L 20 each 29.00
2 in. ,CuI. 10 each 16.15
I 114 Cu., L 12 each 12.38
Tees
3 in., Cu L 4 each 46.00
2 in., Cu L 10 each 25.00
1 114 in., Cu L 6 each t 9.88
Couplings
3 in., Cu I. 15 each 25.00
2 in., Cu L 10 each 13.65
1 1/4 in., Cu L 10 each 10.85
Air separator 3 in I each 80 .
Check valves 3 in. 2 each 25
Ball valves 3 in. 9 each 25
Bal valves 1 114 in 12 each 11.SO
Pump P1 1 each 80
Pump P2 1 each 80
Valve V1 1 each 125
Expansion tank 1 each 75
Automatic air vent 8 each 5.55
Insulationfoam
pipe 3 in. 300 feet 1.99
pipe 2 in. 115' feet 1.87
pipe 1 If4 in. 80 feet 1.72
el 3 in. 20 each 3.99
el 2 in. 10 each 3.72
el 1 1/4 in. 12 each 3.43
tee 3 in. 4 each 5.90
tee 2 in. 10 each 5.60
tee 1 114 in. 6 each 5.17
valve 3 in. 9 each 5.90
valve 1 1/4 in 12 each 5.17
tank urethane 230 SF 0.78
Controls/instruments Est. 1750
Electrical Est. 9M,
Subtotal $14,661
Freight
Totals $14,661
W E X (Continued)
Ducting(c0ntinued) Heat exchangers(c0ntinued)
flow balancing, 3-113 shell-and-tube, 3-63
flow rate, 3-112 waterlair, 3-129
insulation, 3-113 Heat transfer fluids, 3-41
leaks, 3-1 13 corrosion control, 3-42
lessons learned, 5-18 density, 3-43
pressure drop, 3-112 double separation, 2-2,2-16,3-42
reverse return, 3-112 glycol, 3-42,5-4
routing, 3-113 heat capacity, 3-43
sealing, 3-113 potable water, 3-42
thermal conductivity, 3-44
Economics(see cost) viscosity, 3-44
Electrical drawings, 4-3 Hot water recirculation loop, 2-5, 2-6, 2-24
Energy conservation methods, 2-3,2-18
Environmental constraints, 2-2, 2-16 Insolation, 2A- 1
Evacuated collectors, 3-17, 3-40, 38-1 lnstallation checkout procedure, 3-98
Expansion compensation device, 3-34 sample, 4A-1
Installation drawings, 4-2
Fans, 3-114,s-17 Instrumentationand controls
F-CHART,2-6 air collector system, 3-132
adjustment, 2-7 liquid collector system, 3-74
guidelines for use, 2B-1 operational, 3-14, 3-74, 3-98, 3-132, 3-140, 5-15
Feasibility study, 2-1 performance monitoring, 3-99, 3-140
Filters fnsulation, 3-54, 3-71, 5-14
air, 3-13, 3-113,3-129 ducting, 3-113
Fiat plate collector materials, 3-54
air cooled, 3-110,3-114 piping, 3-55
liquid cooled, 3-17, 3-39 Interface controls
Flexible coupling, 3-56 solar/conventional, 3-89
Flow indicator, 3-98 IOM manual, 4-6
Flow switch, 3-75
Freeze protection methods, 1 4 5 - 4 Lessons learned, 5-1
Freezestat, 3-75 Btu meters, 5-16
collectors, 5-9
Glycok, 3-42, 5-4 controllers, 5-15
Goals, 1-2, 1-30, 2-2, 2-1 1 corrosion, 5-7
dampers, 5-18
Heat exchangers, 3-63 drainback system, 5-4
design requirements, 3-64 drainback tank, 5-17
double-walled, 1-9, 3-42 ducting, 5-18
drawing, 3-72 fans, 5-17
effectiveness, 3-64, 3-65, 5-12 freeze protection, 5-4
fouling factor, 3-67, 3-68,3-69 glycol system, 5-4
in-tank, 3-2, 3-63, 3A-1 heat exchanger, 5-12
insulation, 3-71 insulation, 5-14
muftiplate, 3-63 lightning, 5-8
overpressure, 5-7
Design Manual Index Index- Page IN-3
JlDF&(Continued)
JNQFX(Continued)
Tanks
drainback, 3-50, 5-17
drawings, 3-51! 3-58, 3-72
expansion, 3-13, 3-51
lining, 3-5 1, 3-62
material, 3-50
preheat, 3-61
size estimating, 3-60
storage, 3-60,3-62,5-11
Temperature sensors, 3-107
limit switch, 3-75
location, 3-75,3-78
RTDs, 3-105, 3-107
thermistors, 3-105,3-107
thermometers, 3-98
Thermal expansion, 3-32
Thermal load(see load)
Thermal storage(see storage)
1
Solar Design Manual