Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
November, 2012
by
Mushfik Jalal
Executive summary
The extent and persistence of rights situation in Bangladesh requires focused attention and
action. The fisher community lives under adverse social situation. However, whilst
distinguishing the fisher community from society is straight forward on paper using expenditure
data, access to services, violation of rights, rehabilitation, food security safety nets etc.
This base line survey has been conducted on the fishers’ community of Sonargaon Upazila in
Narayanganj District. Sonargaon is a historical place with numerous opportunities in the sector
of fishing. Sonargaon Upazila is criss-crossed by the Meghna River. Fishers have been living
here for long time.
Violation of rights is a complex problem. It is controversial and emotional issues for the world,
but the scenario is acute in the developing countries. Constitution of the Peoples Republic of
Bangladesh and the existing laws signify the right situation of fishers. The study aims to identify
existing economic, social and environmental conditions associated with right situation of fishers’
community in Sonargaon Upazila.
Data has been collected through questionnaire survey, FGD, case study and key informant
survey. Primary data has been collected through beneficiaries and stakeholders. The collected
data has been analyzed using statistical packages.
Analysis finds out deprivation and poor living condition of fishers’ community in Sonargaon
Upazila as well as indentifies opportunity for fishers’ with optimum resources. Fishers’ income
level is such lower that food expenditure covers most part of their total earning. Fishers’ do not
get sufficient basic services and facilities for their livelihood. Most of the households in fisher’
community lacks electricity, sanitation, health facility, education facility, access to govt.
institution. Not a single household is facilitated with drainage or water supply. To some extent
fishers’ or other members of family have to cross long distance to reach at water source, market,
school, health organization. Still many Mohallas are not connected with electricity facility. They
lacks knowledge about Govt. or non Govt. grants such as VGD/VGF, rehabilitation. Their social
bond is not also combined. Fisher community is vulnerable in case of social, natural,
environment, health, economic, politics. Child right is not preserved. Mostly domestic violence
i
against women occurs in this community. Fisher community has a little access to local public
institutions. In most cases satisfaction level of services by those authorities is moderate.
In spite of having mentioned adverse situation, Fishers’ have great opportunity to uplift their
social situation using resource by establishing their rights as fishers’ as well as human being.
ii
Acronyms and Abbreviations
iii
Executive Summary………………………………………………………….……………………………..……………………………………...i
1
5.1 Household information .................................................................................................................... 20
5.2 Economic status............................................................................................................................... 21
5.3 Asset information ............................................................................................................................ 26
5.4 Basic Services and Facilities.............................................................................................................. 29
5.5 Child and Women Right Situation .................................................................................................... 33
5.6 Access to public institutions ............................................................................................................. 35
5.7 Food security status ......................................................................................................................... 36
5.8 Financial debit ................................................................................................................................. 39
5.9 Risk.................................................................................................................................................. 40
5.10 Unawareness or Deprivation? ........................................................................................................ 42
CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION
6.1 Concluding remark........................................................................................................................... 46
Annexure
Appendix-A
Appendix-B
2
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Background
Bangladesh being a first line littoral state of the Indian Ocean has a very good source of marine
resources in the Bay of Bengal. More than 80 percent of the animal protein in the Bangladeshi
diet comes from fish. Fish accounted for 6 percent of GDP in the fiscal year of 1970, nearly 50
percent more than modern industrial manufacturing at that time. Fish for local consumption are
generally of freshwater varieties.
Today, in Bangladesh, when you say ‘fisherman’, the image that comes to mind is often that of a
helpless, debt ridden, over burdened face full of despair living from hand to mouth. Fishermen
are small and marginal. They obviously cannot derive any benefits from economies of scale in
their small, fragmented holdings. And as they are in the unorganized sector they are without
institutional access to modern technologies and knowledge or financial services through which
they can make investments to improve productivity of fish. Poor infrastructure and connectivity
(power, telecom, roads) further compound their competitive disadvantage. It is in this
environment that we are expecting an average Bangladeshi fisher to become a successful
entrepreneur. Indeed, the odds are heavily against him. Unless policy frameworks and
institutionalized support systems are made available and accessible equitably to all, marginal
fishers will continue to find impossible to come out of the vicious cycle of poverty, which they
have been forced into.
The fisher’s communities at Sonargaon Upazila in Narayanganj District have become the victims
of various violations of rights that affected their livelihood seriously. They can’t exercise their
rights over the natural resources. The influential groups with the support of the corrupted
government officials and law enforcement agencies continuing torture over the fisher
communities of the area, but they cannot protest.
Fishers think themselves deprived from others and the quality of the Health Services, Education,
Water, Sanitation and Other Support Services related to fishing activities is very poor due to the
poor responsiveness from the duty bearers.
3
Environment Council Bangladesh (EC Bangladesh) is a national development organization is
currently working to change the lives of disadvantaged and marginal fisher. EC Bangladesh is
currently working on a project entitled “Promoting and Protecting the Rights of Marginal
Fishers”.
Objective of this study is to assess economic condition and right situation of fishers’. Problems
and opportunities of fisher community also have to be identified through assessing economic
condition and right situation.
1.4 Conceptualization
Human rights are those rights that every human being possesses and is entitled to enjoy simply
by virtue of being human.
4
The U.N defines human rights in the following manner-
“Human rights could be defined as those rights which are inherent without which we cannot live
as human beings. Human rights and fundamental freedoms allow man to be fully developed and
use own human qualities, own intelligence, own talents and own conscience and to satisfy their
spiritual and other needs. They are basic for mankind’s increasing demand for life in which the
inherent dignity and work of each human will receive respect and protection. Those human needs
that enable a man or woman to develop his/ her intelligence, occupation, personality, status and
initiative for living a wholesome life may be called human rights. ”
“Human rights are the provision of basic necessities of life that is food, clothing, shelter,
education, medical facilities etc. Again there will be the right to work that is working with
reasonable wages, the right to rest, recreation and leisure and the right to social security.”
When a person will be deprived from his/ her human rights then it will be the violation of human
rights. Generally it is Accepted that right situation degrade when people fall in some form of
severe deprivation. Marginal situation among specific group occurs when the lack of basic
security simultenously affects several aspects of people’s lives, when it is prolonged, and when it
is severely compromises people’s chances of regaining their rights and resuming their
responsibilities in the foreseeable future.
Ellis (2000) bases his framework on different livelihood approaches, such as the research on
sustainable rural livelihoods of Bebbington (1999).
5
Fig: 1 Diagram of Ellis
Ellis theory concurs broadly that poverty policy should be about raising the asset status of the
poor, or enabling existing assets that are idle or under-employed to be used productivity. Such
approach looks positively at what is possible rather than negatively at how desperate things are.
The framework is thought to be particularly useful as a guide to micro policies concerned with
right situation in rural areas, although it may also serve a useful purpose for tracing local level
impact of macro policies refers to interventions that affect livelihood options and strategies at
sectoral and local levels. Micro policies may arise from governments, donors, NGOs, or from
rural people themselves in participatory interaction with any or several other parties. In Ellis
framework, it is the rural household that is taken as the main social unit to which the framework
is applied. It is implied by the use of term “livelihood strategy” in which the household as a
social unit is observed to alter its mix of activities according to its right situation. At community
level, a single livelihood strategy could not apply, since different households will adopt different
strategies according to their particular asset and access status. So this theory is important to
evaluate the approach of the study.
6
Now another livelihood strategy will be evaluated. This strategy is used in the paper of CARE
Bangladesh. This strategy cannot mix the broad aspect of household where Ellis theory can
discuss in broad sense.
7
CARE's use Care’s use of the livelihoods framework for its investigation of households has been
summarized in Figure 2. In addition, the livelihoods approach has been used elsewhere in work
in studies of Bangladesh (Gibson et al., 2004; Hossain, 2005b; Toufique and Turton, 2003).
Livelihoods approaches are very powerful as organizing tools. However, they can sometimes
provide a very static picture of right situation to a household, masking the dynamics of poverty
and related uncertainties, risks, opportunities and resilience that households experience. Wood
recommends that robust qualitative investigation is used to overcome this problem (Wood,
2005). There is also the risk that capitals can be portrayed as 'interchangeable' or 'substitutable'
using this framework, which has been questioned in the environmental livelihoods research
fields. Within the area of poverty reduction initiatives, which deal with a complex interplay of
factors in livelihoods, it is likely that 'capitals' cannot be reduced so simply in this way.
The livelihood approach to protecting right situation and rural poverty reduction comprises the
three main dimensions of right situation to the rural poor, the mediating processes which
influence access to those rights and the use to which they can be put and the strategies adopted
by the rural poor for survival. This rights-access-activities framework is iterative and is a process
unfolding over a time for individuals, households and communities.
8
Chapter Two: Study Area
2.1 Description of Study Area
Araihazar and Rupganj upazilas on the north, Munshiganj Sadar and Gazaria upazilas on the
south, Homna and Gazaria upazilas on the east, Bandar (Narayanganj), Narayanganj Sadar,
Rupganj upazilas and Demra Thana on the west. Map of Sonargaon Upazila has been shown as
follows.
9
N
By the 14th century Sonargaon became a commercial port. Trade activities were mentioned by
travelers like Ibn Batuta, Ma Huan and Ralph Fitch. Maritime ships travelled between Sonargaon
and southeast/west Asian countries. Muslin was produced in this region.
10
Chapter Three: Methodology
3.1 Introduction
The systematic and logical study is guiding a research towards achievement of the desired goals.
The study has been based on a multifaceted research design to achieve the objectives. By
understanding the importance, this chapter will illustrate a step-by-step complete picture of a
sound methodology.
11
measured by subjective tools. Both measurements will measure the multidimensionality, severity
and longevity of right situation of marginal fisher in Sonargaon Upazila
3.5 Sampling
Purposive sampling technique has been used to select household. Fisherman is the target group
of this study. Those households have been selected who feed on fishing activity.
A total of 200 households have been surveyed using probability in proportion to the size of each
village fishers’ population.
12
Table 3: Number of surveyed household in different Mohalla
Mohalla Raghunar Komlapur Gucchagram Shobujbag Chuadanga Tek Shatviya Haria Roghuv
Char Para Para anga
Sample 50 17 20 41 18 16 22 10 6
size
Total 200
Fisher of different living place, religion, income group, age and family type has been specified
for study purpose.
Questionnaire survey
Questionnaire survey has been conducted to find out socio-economic status, access to utility
services and community facilities, access institutions and information, food security status etc.
Case study
A case study is a means of data collection which indicates life time matters related with a single
person. Case study has been conducted to find child right issues.
Focus group discussion
Focus group discussion of stakeholders has been conducted to analyze risk situation of fishers at
household, local and community level.
Key informant survey
Key informant survey has been conducted to find gender issue among fisher community.
3.6.2 Data type and data source
Primary data has been collected for this study. Data sources are fishermen or any senior member
of his family in absence of fisherman, fishery Department, Agriculture Department, Thana
Health Complex and Union Parishad. Data collection procedure can be concised in Table 4.
Table 4: Data collection procedure
13
Research Means of data Data type Data source
type collection
3.7 Conclusion
This chapter helps in understanding survey procedure, parameters and data format. This chapter
guides the discussion of protecting and promoting right situation of fishers.
14
Chapter Four: Legal Rights Provision
4.1 Introduction
Needless to say Fisher community is a part of human society. Legal provision of human rights
comprises of people across the country. Fisher community is not out of such consideration.
Though they deserve additional legal provision as specific beneficiary group. Bangladesh is a
country with numerous opportunities in this sector. A number of legal provisions are included in
statutory as well as constitution of Bangladesh. It is also a matter of concern all over the world.
It shall be a fundamental responsibility of the state to attain, through planned economic growth, a
constant increase of productive forces and a steady improvement in the material and cultural
standard of living of the people, with a view to securing to its citizens-
(a) The provision of the basic necessities of life, including food, clothing, shelter, education
and medical care.
(b) The right to work that is the right to guaranteed employment st s reasonable wage having
regard to the quality and quantity of work.
(c) The right to reasonable rest, recreation and leisure; and
15
(d) The right to social security, that is to say to public assistance in cases of undeserved want
arising from unemployment, illness or disablement, or suffered by widows or orphans or
in old age, or in other such cases.
Article 17: Free and compulsory education
(a) Establishing a uniform, mass oriented and universal system of education and extending
free and compulsory education to all children to such stage as may be determined by law;
(b) Relating education to the needs of society and producing properly trained and motivated
citizens to serve those needs;
(c) Removing illiteracy within such time as may be determined by law.
Article 28: Public health and morality
(1) The state shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the improvement of
(2) The state shall adopt effective measures to prevent prostitution and gambling.
(1) All forms of forced worker are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be
an offence punishable in accordance with law.
(2) Nothing in this article shall apply to compulsory worker.
16
8. The Protection and Conservation of Fish Act, 1950
9. The Tanks Improvement Act, 1939
10. The Private Fisheries Protection Act, 1889
The Protection and Conservation of Fish Act (1950) basically is regulating inland fisheries
which has amended by the Protection and Conservation (Amendment) Ordinance in 1982 and
implemented by the Protection and Conservation of Fish Rules in 1985. Generally, the
Protection and Conservation of Fish Act empowers the government to make rules that prohibit
the destruction of fish by poisoning the water or the depletion of fisheries by pollution, effluents
or otherwise. The Protection and Conservation of Fish Rules specifically deal with the protection
of certain carp species; prohibit certain activities to facilitate their augmentation and production.
The Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock (MoFL), through its Department of Fisheries (D0F), has
overall responsibility for fisheries development, management and conservation. Its functions
included amongst others the preparation of schemes and the coordination of national policy in
respect of fisheries, the prevention of fish disease, the conservation, management and
development of fisheries resources, the management of fish farms and training and collection of
information. The activities of DoF are supported by the Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute
(BFRI), which is responsible for fisheries research and its coordination. In addition, the
Bangladesh Fisheries Development Corporation (BFDC), established under the Bangladesh
Fisheries Development Corporation Act (1973), supports DoF in developing the fishing
industry. Functions of BFDC include, inter alia, the establishment of units for fishing and for the
preservation, processing, distribution and marketing of fish and fishery products.
The overall responsibility for the administration and management of government-owned water
bodies is vested in the Ministry of Land (MoL), in accordance with the State Acquisition and
Tenancy Act (1950) There is no authorization or registration system for fishing in open water
bodies. As such, MoL has passed authority to MoFL to lease several water bodies in the country
as part of its Community Based Fisheries Management Programme. Generally, however, the
management of land and water bodies is conducted through the local government administration.
The Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR) is responsible for integrated water resource
management. It is the National Water Resources Council (NWRC), headed by the Minister of
Water Resources, formulates policy on different aspects of water resources management. MoWR
17
is assisted in its tasks by several agencies like The Bangladesh Water Development Board
(BWDB), and the Water Resources Planning Organization (WARPO).
The fisheries objectives in the National Environmental Policy (1992) are to ensure an appropriate
environment for the conservation and development of fisheries, to prevent activities, which
diminish the wetlands/natural habitats of fish and encourage rehabilitative measures in this area.
The Fish and Fish Product (Inspection and Quality Control) Ordinance (1983) prohibits the
operation of a fish processing and packing plant without a license and stipulates that the
processing of fish must take place in accordance with hygienic rules and conditions. The
Ordinance also prohibits the export of fish and fishery products without a health certificate. The
overall responsibility for fish inspection and quality control is vested in DoF, which maintains
several testing laboratories to certify the quality of exportable fish and fishery products. The
Ordinance is further implemented by the Fish and Fish Product (Inspection and Quality
Control) Rules (1997).
Article 23: (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and
favorable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favorable remuneration ensuring for himself
and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other
means of social protection.
Article 24: (1) Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of
working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
18
Article 25: (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-
being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and
necessary social services and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness,
disability or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
Article 26: (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the
elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and
professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally
accessible to all on the basis of merit.
The Constitution is the supreme law of Bangladesh and takes precedence over any other
provisions of national or international law. In the event of a conflict between a provision of the
Convention on the Rights of the Child and national law, any relevant constitutional provisions
would take precedence, followed by constitutionally-derived national legislation and finally the
Convention, as a part of international law. Thus, the Convention cannot override national law. In
the courts, provisions of the Convention have persuasive value and have, on occasion, been cited
in child custody cases.
Apart from the Constitution, the principal source of the law in the country is legislation.
Legislation consists of laws made by or under the authority of Parliament and may comprise
either statutes or statutory instruments, which are orders, rules and regulations made by a
Government Ministry under the authority of a statute or by-laws made by local government or
other authorities exercising powers conferred upon them by the legislature.
4.5 Conclusion
There are legal provisions for human rights as well as with special attention of fisher community.
But the matter of disappointment is lack of implementation of these provisions. Marginal fishers
are not aware of these provisions. So they cannot take any initiatives to establish their rights.
Different social influence also disallow them to stand on their rights.
19
Chapter Five: Analysis & Findings
Sonargaon fishers’ community’s each household is headed by male. Male persons of households
are the mail income source for family. On the other hand 56% of total households are single and
remaining 44% are joint. It seems that, mos tof the households show interest in living in single
family.
20
above 10 two
persons person
1% 2%
person of 6
6-10
45%
person of 3-5
52%
71% of total households are muslim and remaining 29% of total households are hindu. Other
religion such as Buddhist, Christian etc do not involve in fishing activity.
21
BDT BDT
9057.5 9057.5
6875.5
306.16
Fig 7: Mean expenditure of food vs total Fig 8: Mean expenditure of cloth vs total
BDT BDT
9057.5 9057.5
368.4
551.25
Total expenditure Expenditure in house
Total expenditure Expenditure in health rent
Fig 9: Mean expenditure of health vs total Fig 10: Mean expenditure of H rent vs total
BDT BDT
9057.5 9057.5
693.18 257.6
Fig 11: Mean expenditure of transport vs total Fig 12: Mean expenditure of others vs total
Expenditure in other basic services and facilities are insignificant. Mean expenditure in cloth,
health, house rent and others are BDT 306.16, 551.25, 368.4 and 257.6 respectively.
22
Income pattern of fishermen varies from household to household. a few household earn better
income, although it is not sufficient for survival of their family. Following figure shows the
income level of fisher community of Sonargaon Upazila.
Sometimes expenditure of their household crosses the limit of income level. Their food
expenditure covers most percentage of their total expenditure. Thus they have a little access to
other basic need as they earn a little and expense most in food.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
9
17
25
33
41
49
57
65
73
81
89
97
105
113
121
129
137
145
153
161
169
177
185
193
Expenditure in Food Total Expenditure
Fig 13 is showing fishers cost maximum in food of their total income. They cost around 80% on
food in percentage of total income. Sometimes it reaches intolerable situation when households’
food expenditure exceed 90% or more in percentage of total expenditure. Such situation is
indicating that, most of the households earn to only eat properly three times in a day. They
expense a little on other sector such as health, cloth, education, transport etc. as they earn
insufficiently. A few households are better position comparing others and costs 60% to 70% in
food consumption of their total expenditure but also in unsatisfactory manner.
Most of the households’ income is insufficient considering household size. To earn more
fishermen get involve in other occupation seasonally or very occasionally supplementing their
monthly income for short period of year.
23
120
100
Frequency of household
80
60
40
20
0
less than 5001 5001-10000 10001- 15000 15001-20000
single 16 96 0 0
joint 0 33 48 7
Fig 14 shows that, most of the households of fisher community earn between BDT 5001-
1000/month. Both single and joint family types exist within this range. The number of single
family type is higher in this case. Next higher household frequency falls within range of BDT
10001-15000/month. In this range each family type is joint. This situation also seems in the
monthly income range of BDT 15000-2000/month. But situation is different in the income range
of less than BDT 5000/month. Only sixteen single households exist in this range.
Although fig 14 is showing that higher income range comprises of joint household, but it does
not mean that economic condition is better in joint family. The reason behind this is increasing
per capita expenditure in joint family.
24
Figure 15: Monthly total per capita expenditure on family type basis
Per capita expenditure is higher in joint family than single family. So they have to earn more for
survive.
Fig 16 is showing that, 75% of total households earn between the income range of around BDT
3500 to BDT 10500. A few fisher earn maximum and that is BDT 18000 to 20000. Most of the
household’s income level remains around median income which is about BDT 8500.
Fisher cannot earn enough depending on fishing to lead a sound life. They get involved in
different occupations to supplement income. Whenever they are prohibited to catch fish by
25
authorities, they get involved seasonal and very occasional occupation. Table 6 is showing
different occupations on different time period with each of that mean income.
income
Productive asset
100
80
60
40 Frequency
20
0
Land Chicken Cow Goat Duck
Figure 18 shows the frequency of households owning non productive asset. They earn a little
from productive asset to supplement family income.
26
Non-productive asset
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40 Frequency
20
0
Fig 17 shows 94 households have own land. Not in a significant number but a small number of
households have productive asset such as chicken, duck, cow and goat.
Fig 18 shows fishing net, mobile phone and boat are included in a significant number. Other non
productive
uctive asset such as machinery, jewelry and electronics are owned by a few household.
Mobile phone is common among households as they need in their work for communication.
Fishing net and boat also is important non productive asset for fishermen. Those who do not
have boat or net use others with payment. Different types of nets used by fishermen. Although
‘Cuurent’ Net is forbidden to use but some fisher do not abide by the law. They use this net for
fishing. Sometimes they are caught by authority and be pu
punished.
nished. Following figure is showing
the percentage of different types of net used by Sonargaon fisher community.
27
Fishing Net
moi chandi
baish pira guna
pata 4% 2% 3% 9%
7%
kuna
current 19%
14%
doson
12%
dona
30%
Fig 19 is showing that, 30% of total fishers use ‘Dona’. ‘Kuna’, ‘Doson’ and ‘Current’ are also
used by them and equal to the percentage of 19%, 12% and 14% respectively. A few portion of
fishers use ‘Pata’, ‘Moi’, ‘Baish pira’, ‘Guna’ and ‘Chandi’.
Fishers of living in own, rented and others land are foun in this community. No la
land is provided
by Govt. in this community. Others land refers to those lands that is owned by elite group and
elite group allow fisher’s to live in their land with pre-requisition
pre requisition of sharing a certain portion of
caught fish.
Land ownership
own rented others land
47% 45%
8%
Fig 20:
20 land ownership status of fishers
28
47% of total fisher households stay in others land. 45% of total households’ lives in own land.
Remaining 8% of total households stay in rented house. Here scenario is tough for fishers.
Because most of the fisherss feel insecure in living others land as they may be evicted at anytime
by elite group.
Provision of electricity facility is insufficient. From study it is revealed that 52% of total
households are not facilitated with electricity facility. Besides, most of the electricity facilitated
households use individual solar
lar energy.
solar cable
43%
57%
Here, all electricity facility consumers do not get electric connection provided by Govt.
authority. They use individual solar energy for their household. 57% of total households use such
electricity
ectricity power source. This type of energy cannot be frequently used. This system is not
suitable during absence of sufficient sunlight.
Sanitation facility
ty also seems very poor. Table 7 shows what type of latrine fishermen use and
how they use.
29
Table 7:: Type of sanitation system
From table 7,, most of the households use hanging latrine which is unhygienic. A few have own
latrine. Most households use shared latrine which lacks security and privacy.
Sanitation system is unhygienic. People defecate or urinate mostly in hanging latrine. It is also
polluting environment of the community.
Sanitation
sanitary hanging
41%
59%
Fig 22 shows that, 59% of total households use hanging latrine and remaining 41% of total
households use sanitary latrine which does not degrade surrounding environment.
On the other hand Sonargaon fisher community excludes a single dustbin. They dispose solid
waste
aste at either open space nearby their house or river. A few household dispose solid waste at
drain. Wherever they dispose such disposal has been polluting environment.
30
drain open sapce river
4%
37%
59%
Fig 23:
23 Location of solid waste disposal
Only two Mohallas named Guccha Gram and Shatvai Para have access road. Other Mohallas
have no access road.
Water is available for various purposes such as drinking, cooking, washing and bathing. Water
sources of each household are same for different purposes. Following table is showing water
sources along with maximum and minimum distances from home to source of water.
31
Fisher communities use tube-well
tube well for drinking water. Some households especially in
Roghuvanga have to walk 150 meter for drinking water. Sometimes they use tube
tube-well water for
cooking. In case of washing and bathing each household uses river water.
Is water of tube-well
tube arsenic free?
yes has not been tested
37%
63%
Fig 24:: Percentage of fishers’ households having acquainted with arsenic contamination
contaminati tested/
not tested tube-well
32
Alternative source of drinking water
Source of drinking water
200
0
0
Pond
River
Other
Figure 25 shows that the household who have access to tube well, all household collect their
drinking water from river
29%
71%
33
Table 10: Childhood life calendar of Arshad Gazi
Due to river erosion Arshad Gazi’s family migrated from their own land when he was small
child. He finished study after he had completed primary level. Then he got involved in fishing
activity to supplement family income.
Women are deprived in every sphere of society. There is not any single household in fishers’
community headed by women. They also do not get involve in fishing activity. Violence against
women is quite familiar among Sonargaon fisher community.
To analyze violence against women, a key informant survey has been selected and following
questions were asked. Key informant is a patron fisher among Shatvai Para fishers community.
1. When you think violence against women, what type of violence come to your mind?
2. Women of what age are the worst victim of violence?
3. Whenever a woman became victim of violence, where would she/her family go for
assistance?
4. Are women satisfied with such assistance?
The summary of key informants’ reply is mostly domestic violence occurs. The main reason for
such occurrence is dowry. Besides, fishers earn a little. They cannot afford to meet basic
demands of family. For this reason housewives nag at their husbands and resulting physical
34
torture on wives. A number of sexual assault seems mostly in Char area. Generally women of 20-
30 years are worst victim of violence. Some women are affected by throwing acid.
Generally women do not protest after any type of violence. A few go to elite group for
assistance. They have no faith on police in such cases. Wherever they go for assistance, always
they fail to get justice. Patron-client relationship helps offender to get rid of being punished.
Table 11 shows that, that, annually 51.5% of total households go to fishery department. Only 4%
of total households receive service from agriculture department. Each household go to health
complex for treatment as it offers cheaper treatment and no other private clinic exist within this
locality. 43% of total households visit to union parishad for discussing about different local
issues. Fisher community has a little visit to police as they face different adverse situation during
fishing activity. 26% of total households found in such category.
They receive services of different public authorities. The question is “are they satisfied with
authorities services. Different household’s opinion is different here. Their satisfaction level is
categorized into low, moderate and high. Figure 27 describes their satisfaction level.
35
Satisfaction level
100
90
80
70
60
50 Low
40
30 Moderate
20
High
10
0
Fishery Agri. Govt. Union Police
department Department health parishad service
department
Figure 27 shows fishery department’s performance is low according to most of the fishers’.
Some fishers’ agree with moderate level of satisfaction about this department. A few fishers’
opinion is about higher satisfaction. In case of agri. department the situation is poor. A few
fishers’ receive service from here and says about mostly low and a few on moderate. A
significant number of households receive service from Govt. health organization. Most of the
fisher’s family says moderate about Govt. health facility. In case of union parishad, service
delivery is moderate according to most fisher’s opinion. A police service is mostly commented
by low level of service delivery.
36
Table 12:: Food scarcity of households.
From household survey it is revealed that in this situation 44% of total households ask for help to
their neighbor or friends and another 29% of total households eat less
less quantity of food. 22% of
total households work more for obtaining money or food. Remaining percent substitute less
expensive food and reduce variety of food and the percentage is 4% and 1% respectively.
Coping machanism
substituting less expensive food reducing variety of food
eating less quantity of food asking for help from neighbor of friend
working more for obtaining money or food
4% 1%
22%
29%
44%
Fisher’s households have to cope because they are not aware of any rehabilitation facility. Not a
sigle households have been found where anyone of family holding VGD/VGF card.
37
Holding VGF/VGD card
Holding VGF/VGD card
200
Yes No
41% 45%
14%
Fig 30:
30 Reason behind not having VGD/VGF card
45% of total households replies about problem during subscription by officials. Another 41% of
total households are not interested on VGD/VGF card due to uneven distribution of good.
Remaining 14% of total households are not aware of this service.
38
5.8 Financial debit
As most of the fisher lives fro
fromm hand to mouth, they need to receive loan from different
organization. A few households receive loan to buy necessary inputs
inputs. 72% of total households
receive loan.
Recieve loan?
yes no
28%
72%
Fig 31:
31 Percentage of loan receiving households
Most of the cases fishers receive loan when they feel helpless. They receive loan from different
organization such as NGO (ASA), Govt. organization (BRDB), mohajon (local elite person),
bank (BRAC Bank) and relative/ neighbor.
relative/neighb
or
bank 12%
5%
mohajon
7%
Government NGO
organization 68%
8%
39
Fig 32 shows that 68% of total fishers receive loan from NGO. Remaining fishers receive from
other organization. Although most of the fishers receive loan from NGO but they are not
satisfied by their service. The reason behind receiving most percentage of loans from NGO is its
availability and publicity and simple procedure of receiving loan by NGO employees. But
problem occurs during repayment of loan.
90
80
70
60
Frequency
50
40
30 high rate of interest
20
10 mortgage
0 grab domestic animal/good
no problem
Fig 33 is indicating difficulties seem most in case of NGO. Most of the farmers’ response is that
NGO offers higher rate of interest. They cannot afford to repay loan and as a result they grab
domestic animal/good. Govt. organizations performance is better here during repayment. But a
few fishers receive loan from Govt. organization as fishers are not aware of this loan service.
Besides fishers are interested to receive small scale loan along with frequent manner which Govt.
organization does not allow. On the other hand NGO allows frequent small scale loan along with
simple procedure and here lies the reason behind taking loan from NGO by most fishers.
Repayment of loan to mohanjon, bank and relative/neighbor is not beyond difficulties.
5.9 Risk
Fisher community is not out of certain risk. Suddenly their livelihood can be hampered through
occurrence of different calamities. A focus group discussion (FGD) has been conducted between
officials of local Fishery Department, Agriculture Department, Thana Health Complex and
40
Union Parishad to find out risks fishermen and their family experience
experience during their lifetime.
Table 13 presents risks faced by marginal fishers.
Table 13 is showing different types of risks such as natural, health, social etc. how become
causes of anxiousness among fisher’s Households, Mohalla and community.
Fishers’ community is also in a vulnerable condition in case of spreading knowledge about their
rights as nobody has idea about RTI facts. Figure 34 is showing not a not a single household has
knowledge about RTI facts.
yes no
41
5.10 Unawareness or Deprivation?
It is common that marginal people are not concerned about their rights. The scenario is not
different in case of Sonargaon fisher’s community. The issue is that, really they are not
concerned or it is result of deprivation?
Table 14 is indicating that, 100% households of fisher community do not have VGD/VGF card
as well as they are not facilitated with rehabilitation during “Jatka Nidhon Bondho Korun”
program. There is not a single person having knowledge about RTI facts. Fisher community may
be criticized by Govt. authority saying that they are not aware of their rights. But actually it is
Govt. Authority’s duty to provide VGD/VGF card, rehabilitation, necessary information about
RTI facts among fishers’ community. Authority do not obey their duty to the mentioned inputs
and resulting deprivation of fishers’.
And, when the question arises on fishers’ awareness, it can be said small portion of fisher
community are aware of their rights. Table 14 shows there is 94% of total household reply “NO”
on the question “Is anyone of your family a member of CBO?” Remaining 6% of total
households are found where at least one member of that family is a member of CBO. Only one
CBO is found in Sonargaon fishers’ community named “Bondhumohal”.
42
Why CBO?
12
10
8
6
4
Frequency
2
0
To market To cope To concern To fight
fish on with on their against
better price bureaucratic rights violence
problem
The objective of “Bondhumohal” is to establish equity for catching and marketing fish (fig 35).
Fishers faces problem during fishing activity. Bound to catch fish in certain area, not having
update information on fish pr
price,
ice, jurisdictional restriction during fishing and marketing activity
by other fishers are arising problems associated with marketing of fish.
Met expectation?
Frequency
11
Yes No
Figure 36 indicares that, nobody who joined in CBO have met his expectation.
expectation. Local elite group
prevent their activity. Besides CBO member do not get enough time to participate regular
meeting of CBO.
43
Participate Regular CBO meeting?
Frequency
Yes Sometimes No
Figure 37 is showing that, most of the CBO members sometimes participate in CBO general
Meetings. Mostly they remain busy in some other work (fig 38). CBO members cannot integrate
schedule of meeting as they have not any fixed working schedule. In this case
cas their right is also
violated as workers must have a fix schedule for working.
11
0
0
0
Promlem with
management No faith on
CBO's Busy with some
Board Others
effectiveness oyher works
In fine it can be said that, in most of the cases fishers are being deprived from their rights due to
lack of responsibility
sponsibility of local administration. Fishers’ who have concern on their rights local
44
elite do not allow them to raise their voice. Local administration does not cooperate with fishers
to overcome such situation.
45
Chapter Six: Conclusion
In fine, fishers of Sonargaon Upazila is optimized by resource as Meghna River is crossed across
their community and this river is a great source of “Hilsha” fish. They can meet the demand of
fish specially “Hilsha” all over the country as well as it can be a great source of foreign
remittance by exporting fish to abroad. But nothing can be possible without establishing fishers’
right. Local administration and Fishery Department of Bangladesh Govt. should look after
cordially to on their rights for social uplift of marginal fishers’ in Sonargaon Upazila.
46
REFERENCE
Andersen, J. and Larsen, J. E. (1998) ‘Gender, Poverty and Empowerment’, Critical Social Policy,
Vol. 18 (2): 241-258.
Behrman, Jere R., Harold Alderman & John Hoddinott, (2004), Hunger and malnutrition, Paper
for the Copenhagen Consensus – Challenges & Opportunities, 19 February 2004.
BRAC, (2007) ,BRAC Annual Report 2007, Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee, Dhaka,
Bangladesh.
Dean, M., (1999) Governmentality, Power and Rule in Modern Societ,. London: Sage.
Ellis, F. (2000), Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Etzioni, A., (1995), Rights and the Common Good: The Communitarian Perspective, New York:
St. Martin’s Press.
Halim, M. Abdul, (1996), Role of Voluntary Organizations in the Protection of Human Rights at
the Grassroots, BSEHR publication, Dhaka.
Holzmann, Robert & Steen J., (2000), Social Risk Management: A New Conceptual Framework
for Social Protection and Beyond, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 0006, Social
Protection Unit, World Bank, Washington DC.
Hulme, David & Karen M., (2007), ‘Assisting the poorest in Bangladesh: Learning from BRAC’s
‘Targeting the Ultra Poor’ Programme’, BWPI Working Paper 1, Manchester: Brooks World
Poverty Institute, University of Manchester.
Larsen, J. E., (2001), Spatialization and Culturalization of Social Policy: Conducting Marginal
People in Local Communities’, European Urban Research Association, Copenhagen, 17-19 May
2001.
Martinussen, j., (1997), State Society and Market: A Guide to Competing Theories of
Development, Zed Books, London.
Matin, Imran & David H., (2003), ‘Programs for the poorest: learning from the IGVGD program
in Bangladesh’, World Development, 31 (3), 647–665.
OECD, (2006), Promoting Pro-Poor Growth, Key Policy Messages, OECD, Paris.
R-1
Sen, Binayak, (2003), ‘Drivers of escape and descent: changing households fortunes in rural
Bangladesh’, World Development, 31 (3), 513–534.
R-2
ANNEXURE
Appendix - A
ID:______________
Village:
_________________________
Name of the respondent:
_________________________________________________________________
A-1
3. Total Expenditure (Per Month):
Item Cost (taka) Item Cost (taka)
Food House rent
Cloth Transport
Health Other
Education Total
5. What are your sources of water for different purpose and distance of source from house?
Purpose Source Distance (in meter)
Drinking
Cooking
Washing
Bathing
Code: Source- 1= tube-well, 2= river, 3= pond, 4= other (specify)
6. Asset information:
Productive asset
Non Productive asset
Code for productive asset: 1= Land (shotok),2= chicken, 3= Cow, 4= Goat, 5= Pig, 6=Duck, 7= other (specify)
Code for Non-productive asset: 1=machinery, 2= vehicle, 3=Jewelry, 4= fishing net, 5= Electronics, 6= Mobile
phone, 7= Boat, 8= Other (specify)
A-2
11. Where do you dispose the solid waste? ………………………………..
Code: 1= dustbin, 2= open space, 3= near house, 4= road side,5= river,6= drain,7= other (specify)
16. If there is no tube-well, then what is the source of water for drinking? ………………………..
Code: 1= pond, 2= river, 3= other (specify)
A-3
22. How satisfied are you with the help you receive from following services? Give reason for
your answer.
Type of service Frequency of Satisfaction Reason for level of
use 1= low, satisfaction
(annual) 2= moderate,
3= high
Govt. services
Fishery dept.
Union parishad
Agri. Dept.
Police
Other (specify)
Non-govt. services
NGO (specify) ………………
CBO (specify)…………………
23. In the past 12 months, did you or any member of your family skip a normal daily meal
because you did not have enough food or money to buy food?
Code: 1= Yes, 2= No
24. Did you ever foresee not having enough food for the next meal or for the next day
because of lack of money?
Code: 1= Yes, 2= No
A-4
26. Is there anyone in your family holding VGD/VGF card? …………………….
Code: 1= Yes, 2= No
34. Are you facilitated with any kind of rehabilitation during” jatka nidhon bondho korun”
program? …...
Code: 1= Yes, 2= No
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
A-5
Appendix - B
Childhood life Calendar of Arshad Gazi
1. Household livelihood portfolio: Sources of income, gender, age, education, marital status
2. Capital in asset building: Natural capital, human capital, financial capital, physical capital,
social capital
5. Gender issues: Marriage, dowry, domestic violence, vegetable cultivation and gender role,
access and control, role on capital, health risks for women.
A-6
Key informant interview
1. When you think violence against women, what type of violence come to your mind?
2. Women of what age are the worst victim of violence?
3. Whenever a woman became victim of violence, where would she/her family go for
assistance?
4. Are women satisfied with such assistance?
A-7