SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (SSRG-IJCSE) – volume 2 issue 6 June 2015
Implementation of Fruits Grading and Sorting
System by using Image Processing and Data
Classifier
Miss.Anuradha Gawande#1
#1
A Master of Engineering (ME scholar) , Department of Information Technology , Sipna College of
Engineering &Technology, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, India.
*2
Associate Professor(Guide), Department Of Computer Science and Engineering, Sipna College of
Engineering & Technology, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, India.
Abstract — Sorting of fruits and vegetables is one in every
of the foremost necessary processes in fruits production,
whereas this method is usually performed manually in most
of the countries. In India, essentially in Vidharbha Region,
productions of Oranges square measure on the big scale.
So, for sorting and grading of fruits like orange, apple,
mango etc, this is able to be additional useful in trade to
check the standard of fruits. Machine learning and pc vision
techniques have applied for evaluating food quality also as
crops grading. totally different learning strategies square
measure analyzed for the task of classifying
infected/uninfected pictures of fruits by process on their
external surface, whereas k-nearest neighbor classifier and
supported vector machines, and can be investigate.
Keywords — fruit Quality, fruit images, color, texture,
PCA, pattern classification.
I. INTRODUCTION
The general aim is to fill an important gap at intervals
the applying of computer vision as a tool for business
to review of fruits and vegetables. The techniques of
the computer vision detects quality of agricultural
product , as a result of the requirement to hunt out
another to ancient manual review ways in which
within which and to eliminate contact with the
merchandise and increase responsibility besides of
introducing flexibility to review lines and increasing
the productivity additionally agriculture
industries .[1][2]
Computer application in agriculture and food
industries area unit applied inside the areas of sorting,
grading of recent merchandise, detection of defects
like cracks, dark spots and bruises on recent fruits and
seeds. The recent technologies of image analysis and
machine vision haven't been fully explored inside the
event of machine-controlled machine in agricultural
and food industries. machine-controlled sorting has
undergone substantial growth inside the food
industries inside the developed and developing nations
due to accessibility of infrastructure.[4]
Citrus fruits occupy a significant position in
India‟s fruit production. Republic of Asian nation
ranks sixty fourth in productivity of oranges. Oranges
square measure a vital maturity, firmness, texture and
ISSN: 2348 – 8387 www.internationaljournalssrg.org
Prof.S.S.Dhande*2
.
size. Utterly completely different fruits or vegetables
once shipped across one place to a definite got to be
checked for control. The manual technique of
handpicking the foremost effective fruit or vegetables
among the stock could also be a time overwhelming
methodology. Oranges square measure the foremost
normally adult tree among the globe. In India, the city
that is most celebrated for growing oranges is Nagpur.
Quality examination of food and agricultural
product are sturdy and labour intensive. at constant
time, with exaggerated expectations for nutrient of
high of the vary and safety standards, the necessity for
correct, fast and objective quality determination of
those characteristics in nutrient continues to grow.
However, these operations typically in Republic of
Asian country unit manual that's pricey any as
unreliable as a results of human decision in distinctive
quality factors like look, flavour, nutrient, texture, etc.,
isn't consistent, slow and subjective.[3]
Variety of challenges had to be overcome to
vary the system to perform automatic recognition of
the kind of fruit or vegetable pattern the images from
the camera. many kinds of vegetables, grains, fruits
unit subject to big variation in color and texture,
relying on however ripe they are [20] . as associate
degree example, bananas vary from being uniformly
inexperienced, to yellow, to uneven and brown .The
fruit and vegetable market is getting extraordinarily
selective, requiring their suppliers to distribute the
merchandise in step with high standards of quality and
presentation. Recognizing totally utterly completely
different types of vegetables and fruits may even be a
continual task in supermarkets wherever the cashier
got to be able to denote not solely the species of a
selected fruit (i.e., banana, apple, pear) however
additionally its alternative, which can verify its
value.[5]
II. LITERATURE SURVEY
A lot of analysis has been worn out the fruit sorting
and grading system. VON BECKMANN and
BULLEY (1978) states that co-occurring fruit sorting
by size and color would save time, reducing fruit
handling. For the larger range of the fruits, color is
Page 22
 SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (SSRG-IJCSE) – volume 2 issue 6 June 2015
Polder et al. 2002 used principle element analysis
(PCA) in conjunction with spectral imaging to grade
tomato fruits consistent with their maturity level.[9]
thus commodities in today‟s world, got to be checked
for the photographs from the facet, to hide the
complete fruit surface unattended technique for in-line
standardization, that may be a necessary demand for
real time sorting of tomatoes on compound
concentration exploitation spectral images.
Fig1: RGB color images and concentration images of
six tomatoes ranging from raw to overripe
associated to the physiological maturity, and might be
used as a sorting pattern.
ARIAS et al. (2000) report that the surface
color of tomato could be a major consider
determinative the matureness of this fruit.
VAN DER HEIJDEN et al. (2000) and
POLDER et al.(2000) additionally compared pictures
with normal RGB pictures for classifying tomatoes in
several matureness categories exploitation individual
pixels and obteined similars results.
JAHNS et al. (2001) additionally report that
color, spots and bruises ar simply recognized by the
constituent level. chemist (2002) reports the applying
of a multi color system to pick tomatoes thought-about
physiologically immature, claiming Associate in
Nursing approximation of eighty fifth.
KADER (2002) reports that it had been
necessary to capture a definite range of pictures to get
fruit diameter, recommending the applying of video
pictures to examine the fruit look.[10]
Associate in Nursing initial standardization to
relate the values found to true compound
concentrations continues to be required,but changes
throughout the sorting method, like aging of sunshine
sources, drift of sensors or new batches of tomatoes of
various origin or selection may be recalibrated
exploitation the planned methodology. this technique
valid this exploitation the leave-one-out cross
validation technique exploitation totally different
tomatoes within the standardization and validation
phases.[10] except for a additional sound conclusion a
replacement experiment with tomatoes of various
origin,or changes within the acquisition system must
be done.
The planned system can be enforced in a very sensible
quality sorting system. an enormous advantage of this
technique compared to supervised systems is that less
reference knowledge for the standardization ar
required. KADER (2002) reports that it had
ISSN: 2348 – 8387 www.internationaljournalssrg.org
been necessary to capture a definite range of pictures
to get fruit diameter, ,but changes throughout the
sorting method, like aging of sunshine sources, drift of
sensors or new batches of tomatoes of various origin
or selection may be recalibrated exploitation the
planned methodology.This technique valid this
exploitation the leave-one-out cross validation
technique exploitation totally different tomatoes
within the standardization and validation phases.[10]
except for a additional sound conclusion a
replacement experiment with tomatoes of various
origin,or changes within the acquisition system must
be done.
Automatic image segmentation by group
action seeded region growing and color edge detection
was planned by Fan et al. [12]. they need used quick
Entropy thresholding for the extraction of edges. when
they need obtained color edges that provided the
foremost geometric structures in a picture, then they
need determined the centroids between these adjacent
regions and regarded it because the initial seeds. These
seeds were then replaced by centroids of the generated
solid edge regions by incorporating the extra pixels
step by step.
The planned system can be enforced in a very
sensible quality sorting system. an enormous
advantage of this technique compared to supervised
systems is that less reference knowledge for the
standardization ar required. This makes this technique
easier,faster and cheaper to use.
Lino et al.(2008) planned a grading system
for lemons and tomatoes exploitation color options for
matureness detection. during this system, the ripening
of tomato occurred a rise of the red color and a
decrease of the inexperienced color, indicating
chlorophyl degradation meantime lycopen began to be
created. matureness levels for tomatoes were
calculable by activity decrements within the
luminosity, blue and inexperienced channels yet as
increments within the red channel.
Machine vision systems and close to infrared
examination systems are introduced to several grading
facilities with mechanisms for inspecting all sides of
fruits and vegetables (Kondo, 2009). Nondestructive
quality analysis of fruits is {vital|is very important}
and really vital for the food and agricultural business.
historically grading of fruits is performed primarily by
visual examination mistreatment size as a selected
quality attribute. Image process offers answer for
machine-driven fruit size grading to produce correct,
reliable,
consistent and quantitative info excluding handling
giant volumes, which can not be achieved by using
human graders (Sudhakara-Rao and Renganathan,
2002).Tabatabaeefar et al., (2000) bestowed Associate
in Nursing approach to modify fruit sorting
mistreatment info that's noninheritable from elite
sensors that live and quantify parameters (color,
firmness, size, weight) that area unit indicators of fruit
quality. Fernando et al[11](2010) designed a
Page 23
 SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (SSRG-IJCSE) – volume 2 issue 6 June 2015

system to diagnose six differing kinds of surface 2. Testing Phase

defects in citrus fruits employing a variable image 2.1 Testing Algorithm for adaptively created
analysis strategy. pictures were flat and projected onto database
a reference eigenspace to make a score matrix wont to Input: Infected image
reckon defective maps. A 94.2% accuracy was Output: Infected patterns with percentage
reportable.[7] Step 1: Select an image.
Haiguang et al. [12](2012) classified 2 types of Step 2: Enhance an image.
wheat diseases supported color, form and texture Step 3: Pre-process an image.
options to coach a back propagation neural network. Step 4: Detect infected patterns in Pre-process image.
The ensuing system achieved a classification accuracy Step 5: Calculate percentage of infection.
of over ninetieth. Step 6: Display result.
Cho et al. [13], in 2013 used hyperspectral light Ste p 7: Stop
imaging for police work cracking defects on cherry
tomatoes.

III .Proposed Methodology

The proposed work is basically a design of
framework with two modules:
1. Input Image Processing :- (Training Phase )
2. Pattern Classification :- (Testing phase)
.
1. Training Phase
In training phase following algorithms are used to
create database of infected patterns.
1.1 Algorithm for Create database adaptively
Input: Infected image
Output: Save infected patterns in database
Step 1: Take input as an infected image.
Step 2: Enhance that image.
Step 3: Pre-processing to enhance image.
Step 4: Locate infected patterns.
Step 5: Crop the located pattern and save to database.
Step 6: Stop.

1.1.1 Image Enhancement Algorithm

Input : Infected image
Output: Filter image
Step 1: Take input as an infected image.
Step 2: Find RGB component.
Step 3: Convert RGB image into gray scale image.
Step 4: Remove noise by applying filter.
Step 5: Get filtered image.

1.1.2 Image Pre-processing Algorithm

Input : Filter image
Output: Save infected patterns
Step 1: Take input as filter image.
Step 2: Read all pixel of an image.
Step 3: Set pixels value in a range of 0 to 10 and 245
to 255 to 0(Black) remaining pixel to
1(white).
Step 4: Locate region in enhance image.
Step 5: Crop infected patterns.
Step 6: Save infected patterns into database.
Step 7: Stop.

ISSN: 2348 – 8387 www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 24

 SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (SSRG-IJCSE) – volume 2 issue 6 June 2015

INPUT IMAGE PROCESSING PATTERN MATCHING

Select any type of Segment Input Images

Fruit Image

Removal of Segment Database Images

Background

Detect and Crop Locate Infected Pattern

Fruit from Database
Crop infected
Enhance Images patterns from
images
Save Detected Patterns to
Get Infection from database
images

Grading of images Store Patterns in

Database

Check out Percentage of

infection.

Sorting

Low Average
Not
Infected Infected
infected
High
Mediu Fully Infected
m Infected fruit
Infecte fruit images
d 2:- Architecture
Fig imagesof fruit (images) grading and
sorting

ISSN: 2348 – 8387 www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 25

 SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (SSRG-IJCSE) – volume 2 issue 6 June 2015

II. Experimental results Mean Intensity = Avg (Red+Green+Blue)/3

3) Get Infection Region:-

Fig3: Input Image Fruit Fig6:- Infected part from input image
I/p Image Entropy Mean Intensity
Fruit 17.3498 0.54902
Entropy Mean Time for Total PSNR
Intensity Processing infection
Table I - Original Image 13.6417 0.74902 0.07346sec 42.23% 11.3634
A) Input Image Processing:-
Table III -Infection Detection from Image
1) Crop image and filter background:-
Cropping of unwanted part of image and filter 4) Grading and sorting of Image:
background of image with green color to get more Percentage of Level of
accurate result while image processing. Infected region fruit
0-10 Low
10-30 Average
30-60 Medium
60-80 High
80-100 Extreme
High
Fig 4: crop and filter background of image
Table IV - Criteria for grading
2) Enhance Image:-

Infection region Infection Processing

Input Percentage Level Time
Image
Fruit.jpg 20.69% Average 0.70088
Table V- Grading and Sorting of Image

Mean Entropy of Time for PSNR of The original fruit image store in Average folder after
Intensity Image Enhancement Denoise grading and sorting.
Image
0.63529 17.5637 0.53378sec 16.7065 5) Crop and Store Infected sample:-
Cropping of an infected fruit sample for pattern
Fig 5:-Enhance Image matching and store this pattern in template folder.
Table II - Enhance Image
PSNR stands for peak signal to noise ratio. It
used to measure the quality of images. Higher the
PSNR value, better the quality of image. It is
estimated in decibels (db). Fig 7:- blackspot.jpg
PSNR = 10.log10 ( MAX2I /MSE )

MSE stands for the mean square error. Lower the

value of MSE, better the quality of image. It is defined
as
m-1 n-1
MSE = 1 ∑ ∑ [ I (i, j) – K (I, j) ]2
m n i=0 j=0
Here m and n represents the no. of rows and columns
of the image respectively. I𝑖𝑗 is the original image and
K𝑖𝑗 is the enhance image.

ISSN: 2348 – 8387 www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 26

 SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (SSRG-IJCSE) – volume 2 issue 6 June 2015
B) Pattern Matching:-
1) Segment Input Image:-
Fig8:-Segment Image
Entropy of Time for PSNR of
segment segmentation denoise
image image
0.62902 0.22267 sec 3.5803
Table VI - Enhance Image
2) Segment Database Images:-
Time for infected pattern segmentation with
(template) database sample is 10.2374 seconds.
3) Save Detected Patterns to Database:-
Store detected patterns as disease to database for
automatic detection at the time of Locate future
patterns and infections.
I. CONCLUSION
In this paper, the objective of the proposed method is
to identify infected region from the input images and
classify the infected patterns as per their level of
infection aka low, average, medium, high, extreme
high and fully infected fruits according to external
surface. We have used infected fruit images for the
experimental observations and evaluated the
introduced method considering all types of fruits
(apple, oranges, mangos, watermelon etc) as a case
study. Experimental results suggest that the proposed
approach is able to accurately find out the defected
area from fruit images and grading them as per their
level of infection and by using KNN classifier it can
be accurately classify the infected images and store in
their respective database. The future work includes
processing on multiple images and grading them as
per criteria and then sorting will make a number of
clusters based on the infection level and store them to
respective database accurately.
II. REFERENCES
[1] Timmermans, A.J.M., “Computer Vision System for Online
Sorting of Pot Plants Based on Learning Techniques”,
ActaHorticulturae, 421, pp. 91-98, 1998.
[2] Yam, K.L., and E.P. Spyridon , “A Simple Digital Imaging
Method for Measuring and Analyzing Colour of Food Surfaces”,
Journal of Food Engineering, 61, pp. 137-142, 2003.
[3] Francis, F.J., “Colour Quality Evaluation of Horticultural
crops”, HortScience, 15(1), pp. 14-15, 1980.
[4] SapanNaik and Dr. Bankim Patel, “Usage of Image Processing
and Machine Learning Techniques in Agriculture - Fruit Sorting”,
CSI Communications, October 2013.
ISSN: 2348 – 8387 www.internationaljournalssrg.org
[5] Jyoti A Kodagali and S Balaji, “Computer Vision and Image
Analysis based Techniques for Automatic Characterization of Fruits
– a Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975
– 8887), Volume 50 – No.6, July 2012.
[6]M.Turk, , A.Pentland ”Eigenfaces for recognition,” .J. cognitive
neuroscience , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71-86, 1991
[7] S.Mika, G.Rtsch, J.Weston, B.Schkopf, K.R.Miller”Fisher
discriminant analysis with kernels,” Neural Networks for Signal
Processing IX. “.In: 1999 IEEE Signal Processing Society
Workshop, pp. 41-48, 1999.
[8] E.Elhariri, N. El-Bendary, M. M. M.Fouad, J.Plato, A. E.,
Hussein and A. M Hassanien ”Multi-class SVM Based
Classification Approach for Tomato Ripeness,” Innovations in Bio-
inspired Computing and Applications, Advances in Intelligent
Systems and Computing, vol. 237, pp.175-186.2014.
[9] G., Polder, G.W. van der Heijden, and I.T.Young, ”Tomato
sorting using independent component analysis on spectral images,”
Real-Time Imaging, vol. 9,no. 4, pp. 253-259, 2003.
[10]A.C.L. Lino, J. Sanches and I.M.D. Fabbro,”Image processing
techniques for lemons and tomatoes classification,” .Bragantia, vol.
67, no. 3,pp. 785-789, 2008.
[11] F. Lpez-Garca, G. Andreu-Garca, J. Blasco, N. Aleixos and J.
M. Valiente,“Automatic detection of skin defects in citrus fruits
using a multivariate image,” .Computers and lectronics in
Agriculture,vol. 71, pp. 189-197, 2010.
[12] H. Wang, G. Li, Z. Ma and X. Li,”Image recognition of plant
diseases based on backpropagation networks,” .In: 5th International
Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP 2012), pp. 894-900,
2012
[13] B. K. Cho, M. S. Kim, I. S. Baek, D. Y. Kim, W. H. Lee,
J.Kim,H. Bae and Y.S Kim ”Detection of cuticle defects on cherry
tomatoes using hyperspectral fluorescence imagery,”. Postharvest
Biology and Technology, vol. 76, 2013, pp. 40-49, 2013.
[14] O.O. Arjenaki, P. A.Moghaddam and A.M. Motlagh
”Online tomato sorting based on shape, maturity, size, and surface
defects using machine vision,” .Turkish Journal of Agriculture and
Forestry, vol. 37, pp. 62-68,2013.
[15] D. Gadkari ”Image quality analysis using GLCM. University of
Central Florida,” Master of Science in Modeling and Simulation,
College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Central Florida,
Orlando,
Florida, Downloaded May 2014, http://etd.
fcla.edu/CF/CFE0000273,
2004.
[16] F.Albregtsen ”Statistical texture measures computed from
gray level
concurrences matrices, “Image Processing Laboratory, Department
of
Informatics, University of Oslo, pp. 1-14, 1995.
[17] A. Tharwat, A.M. Ghanem and A.E. Hassanien, ”Three
different
classifiers for facial age estimation based on K-nearest neighbor,” In
9th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), pp.
55-60,2013.
[18] A. Jain, K. Nandakuma, and A. Ross, ”Score
normalization in multimodal biometric systems, “Pattern
recognition, vol. 38, np. 12, pp. 2270-2285, 2005.
[19] D.D. Lewis ”Naive (Bayes) at forty The independence
assumption in Information retrieval Machine
learning,”„ .Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on
Machine Learning ECML-98, pp. 4-15, 1998.
[20] R. Ghaffari, F. Zhang, D. Iliescu, E. Hines, M.S. Leeson, R.
Napier and J. Clarkson ”Early Detection of Diseases in Tomato
Crops: An Electronic Nose and Intelligent Systems Approach,” In:
The IEEE 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
(IJCNN), pp. 1-6,2010.
[21] M. Stricker, M. Orengo ”Similarity of color images,” In: SPIE
Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video
Databases III,vol. 2420, pp. 381-392, Feb 1995
Page 27