Cac HW Ej TBN 4G SHB2 Nae 310 Lte 20181210 V1

LTE NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 1 (47)
Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Rendhita/ Jhon P Seahawk 2018 EJ_TBN_4G_SHB2_NAE_310
Approved Checked Date Rev Reference
Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
CLUSTER ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE

(CAC)
LTE PROJECT
Area East Java
City Surabaya
Cluster Name EJ_TBN_4G_SHB2_NAE_310

Abstract
This document is to provide report for XL Axiata on Cluster Acceptance Cluster based for commercial LTE
launch. Approval or reject using . logic SOM { SOM and HS , if SOM OK -> END ]
PT. HUAWEI SOM

TECH INVESTMENT PT. XL AXIATA Tbk.
${Level2}
Name: Achmad Fausi Name:
Date: 25 November 2018 Date:


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 5
1.1 Introduction 5
1.2 General Site Information 5
1.2.1 New Site Database 5
1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier 6
1.2.3 Punch List Database 6
1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment” 7
1.4 FTP Server Information 8
1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail 8
2 MAP INFORMATION 8
2.1 Map Information 8
2.1.1 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction 9
3 Performance Result 11
3.1 NMS KPI LTE 11
3.1.1 Availability 11
3.1.2 Accessibility 11
3.1.3 Retainability 11
3.1.4 Integrity 11
3.1.5 TX_RANK (Info Only) 12
3.1.6 Mobility 12
3.1.7 Utilization 12
3.1.8 CSFB 12
3.1.9 Traffic and Capacity 13
3.2 Drive Test KPI 15
3.2.1 Retainability 15
3.2.2 Accessibility 15
3.2.3 CSFB 15
3.2.4 Integrity 15
3.2.5 Mobility 16
3.2.6 RSRP IDLE Drive Test 16
3.2.7 SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test 18
3.2.8 PCI Plot 19
3.2.9 CQI 20

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.10 RSRQ 20
3.2.11 PS DL Throughput 22
3.2.12 PS UL Throughput 23
3.2.13 Transmission Modes Plot 24
3.2.14 Channel Bandwidth Plot 25
3.2.15 Event Failed 25
3.2.16 Sleeping Cell Identification 26
3.2.17 External Interference Identification 26
3.2.18 Cell Overshooting 27
3.2.19 Bad Spot analysis and Improvement 28
Physical Tuning Summary 32
3.2.1 Parameter Tuning Summary 32
4 NMS KPI RAN LTE TREND 32
5 KPI 2G & 3G 35
5.1 List of 2G, 3G & LTE sites inside LTE Polygon 35
5.2 NMS 2G 36
5.3 NMS 3G 36
5.4 MRR 3G 36
5.4.1 MRR RSCP 36
6 FEATURE 38
7 Issues, Recommendation and Exclusion 42
7.1.1 Ping Latency 32bit 42
7.1.2 Ping latency 1000bit 43
7.2 KPI 2G & 3G 44
7.3 Justification 44
8 Conclusions 47

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Table of Figure
Figure 1: Cluster Map Information ......................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 2: Drive Test Route ....................................................................................................................................... 9
Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route ............................................................................ 9
Figure 6: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result ................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 7: RSRP CDF Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 17
Figure 8: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result ..................................................................................................... 18
Figure 9: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test .............................................................................................................. 19
Figure 15 PCI Plot .................................................................................................................................................. 19
Figure 17 CQI Distribution Result .......................................................................................................................... 20
Figure 16 RSRQ Drive Test Result .......................................................................................................................... 21
Figure 18 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 22
Figure 19 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 23
Figure 21: Channel Bandwidth Plot ...................................................................................................................... 25


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Provisional Acceptance shall be conducted after all the sites on air within cluster. If there are
some issues that halt the RFS e.g. due to delayed community case, tower strengthening,
etc, PAC can be conducted when at least 85% of sites are on air within a cluster. In the case
of mushroom site where there is only 1 new site only with existing neighbor sites SSO is
conducted for PAC.
This document presents the result of Cluster Drive test and Network Performance KPI based
on active measurement and OSS data collection for EJ_TBN_4G_SHB2_NAE_310
The drive-test KPIs are evaluated by drive-test coverage and statistic according to the pre-
defined drive-test route that is mutually agreed by both parties.
The results of the measurements are then compared with the passing criteria agreed upon
by XL and HUAWEI.
1.2 General Site Information

General Site Information
Cluster Name EJ_TBN_4G_SHB2_NAE_310
Area GRESIK
Total number of cluster sites 9 Site
Total number of planned sites 1 Site
Total number of On-Air Macro sites: 9 Site
Total number of Pico Site 0 Site
Total number of pending On-Air Macro Sites 0 Site
Total number of pending On-Air Pico Sites 0 Site
1.2.1 New Site Database

eNB ID LTE Site Name CellID Longitude Latitude TAC PCI Status OA Date
29-Nov-
543643 4543256E_LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 4 112.3298472 -7.092361 55540 414 Integrated
18
29-Nov-
18
29-Nov-
18

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier

eNB ID LTE Site Name CellID Longitude Latitude TAC PCI Fix Stats
544100 454EB10E_LTE_BULULMNGAN 4 112.2023 -6.8861611 55540 69 existing on air
543346 4542743E_LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN 4 112.382 -7.12217 55540 435 existing on air
544213 454F204E_LTE_KARANG_LANGIT 4 112.35 -7.09709 55540 141 existing on air
543911 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI 4 112.341 -7.06017 55540 249 existing on air
543910 4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo 4 112.34 -7.13822 55540 207 existing on air
543903 4543238E_LTE_MENONGO 4 112.325 -7.11375 55540 336 existing on air
543820 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP 4 112.314 -7.06059 55540 9 existing on air
543198 4541788E_LTE_SUKODADI 4 112.312 -7.09409 55540 78 existing on air
1.2.3 Punch List Database
There is no punch list at this Cluster.
Drive Test Methodology “Mobility Assessment”

Drive test shall be performed under below circumstances:
 Cluster is barred / reserved to ensure only single user camp in the cluster using USIM class 11
 HotRod Prioritas profile to be used

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
LTE Mobile
KPI Measured Remark
No. UE Method RAT BAND
RSRP, RSRQ, PCI 1 laptop, separated

Handset1 Idle Lock LTE LTE 1800
Plot round between UL
Round
& DL Test to
1 HUAWEI Dedicated,
PDCP DL THP, guarantee single
E392 continues Lock LTE LTE 1800 user
SINR
(Modem) download
HUAWEI Dedicated,
E392 continues Lock LTE LTE 1800 PDCP UL THP 1 laptop, separated
(Modem) Upload round between UL
Round
& DL Test to
2 Dedicated, IRAT HO on
Automatic WCDMA / 1800/ guarantee single
Handset 1 continues edge 4G user
(Unlocked) LTE 2100
download coverage
1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment”
Stationary KPI’s will be tested based on the agreed-on methodology with XL team. Cell Edge
Performance for Link Budget Verification will be tested on the spot where the RSRP reaches between
-115dBm to -120dBm at the edge of a cluster.
LTE Mobile
KPI Measured Remark
No. UE Method RAT BAND

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Speedtest (OOKLA &

Open Signal) is
required at badspot
area (-<115 dBm)
Static Handset1 Static Lock LTE LTE 1800 Target > 1 Mbps
which is detected
from MR or DT with
maximum 3 spots
with GnetTrack
HotRod Priority
Speed (higher Downlink QoS Test,
QoS) is higher best Condition Spot.
Static Handset 1 Static Lock LTE LTE 1800
than Super Continues
HotRod (lower download > 2 Min
QoS)
1.4 FTP Server Information
IP Address
FTP Server information
IP:103.52.146.236
1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail
Samsung Galaxy S5
DT Tools
GENEX Probe v3.16
Date of DT 07 Desember 2018
DT Team Rusli
2 MAP INFORMATION
2.1 Map Information
Figure 1: Cluster Map Information


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
2.1.1 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction
Figure 2: Drive Test Route
Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route
Item Result Target PAC Ref
Site List, Polygon Border, DT Route and Coverage Must be matched with
Match Pass
Prediction match with agred design agreed design

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Residensial
EJ_TBN_4G_SHB2_IMP_066.xlsx
SubUrban_Open_Area(%)
Road_Open_Area(%)
Coverage Area(km2)
RSRP Criteria (dBm)
% of Coverage Area
Max Vaule (dBm)
Inland_Water(%)
Min Value (dBm)
Green_Land(%)
Percentage (%)
Village(%)
Forest(%)
Scrub(%)
Legend
-85 DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 Infinity 1.0 2.6 2.6 0.0 9.7 13.3 3.3 4.4 18.5
-90 =-90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 -85 0.8 2.2 0.6 0.0 6.0 11.1 5.4 4.8 10.8
-100 -100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 -90 3.4 9.2 0.4 0.0 3.0 14.2 3.2 1.5 4.4
-105 -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 -100 3.5 9.4 0.6 0.0 1.9 23.9 1.3 0.0 4.2
-115 -115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 -105 13.9 37.5 0.2 0.0 5.1 35.9 1.4 0.8 8.5
Infinity DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 -115 14.5 39.1 0.0 0.0 4.2 44.1 0.9 0.2 8.2
TOTAL 37.2 100.0 4.3 0.0 30.0 142.6 15.5 11.7 54.6
Figure 4: Residential Prediction using Planning Tools & RSRP Result


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3 Performance Result
3.1 NMS KPI LTE
Cell KPI Aggregate for 7 days, taken at cell busy hour except for Availability.
Availability is measured within 24 hrs in a day. Cell busy hour is defined as the hour
when downlink and uplink payload reach the peak value.
Measurement period:
Date (Start - End) 30 Nov 2018 to 06 Des 2018
3.1.1 Availability
No Name Target PAC Result Status
1 Cell Availability > 99% 100.00% Pass
3.1.2 Accessibility

1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 99.93% Pass
2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 99.94% Pass
3.1.3 Retainability
1 Session Abnormal Release Rate < 1.4% 0.08% Pass
3.1.4 Integrity

1 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 1.00E-02 Pass
2 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0.00E+00 Pass
> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)
3 Downlink User Throughput (Peak)* > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) 32.28 Mbps Info only*
> 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)
4 Uplink User Throughput (Peak)* > 20 Mbps (10 MHz) 7.75 Mbps Info only*
> 33 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 5.1 Mbps (3 MHz)
5 Downlink User Throughput (Average)* 12.95 Mbps Info only*
> 17 Mbps (10 MHz)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

> 25.5 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
6 Uplink User Throughput (Average)* > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 1.32 Mbps Info only*
> 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
7 DL Uu Latency < 8 ms 1.19 Pass
* Depend on user behavior
3.1.5 TX_RANK (Info Only)
TX2 TX4 ISD

eNB ID LTE Site Name CID Remarks MIMO
(2T2R) (4T4R) (m)
4543256E 4543256E_LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 4 - Normal 2363 MIMO 2T2R
TXRank2.xlsx
3.1.6 Mobility

1 Handover Success Rate Intra-Frequency > 98% 99.97% Pass
2 Handover Success Rate Inter-Frequency > 98% 100% Pass

Handover Success Rate Inter-RAT (PSHO,
3 > 95% 100% Pass
not RwR)
3.1.7 Utilization
1 Maximum eNodeB CPU Utilization < 70% 29% Pass
3.1.8 CSFB

1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time* <5s 1.42 s Pass
2 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success Rate > 97% 100% Pass

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time* < 3.5 s 1.82 s Pass

4 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success Rate > 97% 100% Pass
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE* <5s 1.60 s Pass
6 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate* > 97% 100% Pass
* Measured using probe (Smart Care or Anritsu)
3.1.9 Traffic and Capacity
3.1.9.1 Payload
Name PAC Result*
UL Volume (Gigabyte) 2.32 GB
DL Volume (Gigabyte) 40.85 GB
Trend daily Payload (GB)
Sum of UL Traffic Volume Sum of DL Traffic Volume

Date
(GByte) (GByte)
2018-11-30 0.5745 5.4055
2018-12-01 0.5225 5.4093
2018-12-02 1.356 5.2815
2018-12-03 0.3029 5.9757
2018-12-04 0.3418 5.4723
2018-12-05 0.9878 5.4519
2018-12-06 2.1536 8.4842
Grand Total 6.2391 41.4804
3.1.9.2 PRB Utilization

DL PRB UL PRB
DL PRB UL PRB Utilization Utilization
Site ID Utilization Utilization (%) (%)
LTE Site Name CellID
LTE (%) (%) (BH Daily (BH Daily
Max Max averaged averaged
in a week) in a week)
4543256E 4543256E_LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 4 53.03 29.54 32.67 18
4543256E 4543256E_LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 5 45.67 16.65 29.62 11.8
4543256E 4543256E_LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 6 54.9 26.27 42.89 20.48
*Calculation:
 Busy hour is defined as the hour in which sum DL & UL payload reach the highest value
 Daily : on busy hour, UL/DL PRB utilization is averaged for each cell on each site

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
 Weekly : averaging daily value

 Provided for information only
3.1.9.3 Number of RRC Connected User

RRC Connected User RRC Connected User
Site ID
LTE Site Name (Average Week, Daily (Average Week, Daily
LTE
Max) Sum)
4543256E 4543256E_LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 20.8 356.38
*Calculation:
3.1.9.4 Number of IRAT HO Attempt

Site ID IRAT HO Attempt Preparation
LTE Site Name CellID
LTE (Sum daily, summing on a week)
4543256E 4543256E_LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 4 0
*Calculation:
 Daily : on busy hour, IRAT HO Attempt is summed for each cell toward its relation
 Weekly : summing daily value
Note: Attached xls showing cell relation below:


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2 Drive Test KPI
3.2.1 Retainability
PAC
No Name Target Status Remark
Result
Session Abnormal In PAC, value is measured on mobility or
1 < 1.4% 0.00% Pass
Release Rate stationary on each PCI
3.2.2 Accessibility
No Name Target PAC Result Status Remark
1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 100% Pass In PAC, value is measured on
mobility or stationary on
2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 100% Pass each PCI
3.2.3 CSFB
No Name Target PAC Result Status Remark
1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time ≤5 s 3.17s Pass

Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success In PAC,
2 Rate
>97% 100% Pass value is
measured
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time ≤3.5s 1.21s Pass
on mobility
Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success
4 Rate
>97% 100% Pass
or
stationary
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE ≤5 s 0.44s Pass on each PCI
6 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate >97% 100% Pass
3.2.4 Integrity
RTT Packet Delay (ping) 32/1000 45.00ms/ Pass with
1 <= 20 ms / 30 ms
bytes 60.40ms Justification
2 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 Pass
3 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 Pass
> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)
4 Downlink Peak User Throughput* > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) 94.65 Mbps Info only*
> 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)
5 Uplink Peak User Throughput* > 15 Mbps (10 MHz) 64.97 Mbps Info only*
> 25 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4 Mbps (3 MHz)
6 Downlink Average User Throughput 14.15 Mbps Pass
> 15 Mbps (10 MHz)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

> 22.5 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
7 Uplink Average User Throughput > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 13.23 Mbps Pass
> 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
8 Jitter (Uplink and Downlink) < 50 ms 8.8 ms Pass
Note: all above values are measured on mobility or stationary on each PCI
*Depends on single user scenario and Transmission Capacity
3.2.5 Mobility
No Name Ref PAC Result Status Remark
Handover Success Rate Intra-
1 > 98% 100% Pass 100%
Frequency
Handover Success Rate Inter- Applicable if L900/L2300 are
2 > 98% N/A N/A
Frequency deployed
Handover Success Rate Inter-
3 > 95% 100% Pass 100%
RAT (PSHO, not RwR)
3.2.6 RSRP IDLE Drive Test
Figure 4: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Min Value (dBm) RSRP Criteria (dBm) Max Value (dBm) Percentage (%) Legend
-85 DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 Infinity 13.86%
-90 -90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 -85 11.28%
-100 -100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 -90 38.40%
-105 -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 -100 14.94%
-115 -115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 -110 16.27%
-Infinity DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 -115 5.25%
Not
RSRP ≥ -105 78.48%
Pass
PAC Result
Target Status
(RSRP Plot >-105 dBm Result)
In 95% of cluster, the RSRP must be ≥ -105 dBm -115 dBm @ 95% Pass
No low RSRP ( < -105 dBm ) is found near site ± 300m) Not found Pass
CDF Plot:
Figure 5: RSRP CDF Distribution


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.7 SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test
Figure 6: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result
Min Value (dB) SINR Criteria (dB) Max Value (dB) Percentage (%) Legend
20 SINR (dB)>=20 Infinity 9.83%
10 10<=SINR (dB)<20 20 33.01%
3 3<=SINR (dB)<10 10 31.59%
0 0<=SINR (dB)<3 3 12.09%
-5 -5<=SINR (dB)<0 0 10.60%
-Infinity SINR (dB)<-5 -5 2.88%
SINR ≥ 3 74.43% Not Pass
Target PAC Result Status

In 85% of cluster, SINR-DL must be > 3 dB 4 dB @ 85% Pass
No Low SINR (<3 dB) is found near site (± 300m) Not found Pass
CDF Plot:

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Figure 7: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test
3.2.8 PCI Plot
Figure 8 PCI Plot

No partial / full cross feeder is detected Information only Pass

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.9 CQI
Figure 9 CQI Distribution Result
Min Value CQI Max Value Percentage (%)

10 10 <= CQI Value < 15 15 43.41%
5 5<= CQI Value < 10 10 48.74%
3 3<= CQI Value < 5 5 6.89%
0 0 <= CQI Value < 3 3 0.97%
Item Status
CQI Distribution* Info Only
3.2.10 RSRQ
RSRQ is provided for information only.


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Figure 10 RSRQ Drive Test Result
Min Value (dB) RSRQ Criteria (dB) Max Value (dB) Percentage (%) Legend
-6 RSRQ (dB)>=-6 Infinity 8.50%
-9 -9<=RSRQ (dB)<-6 -6 40.40%
-11 -11<=RSRQ (dB)<-9 -9 23.83%
-14 -14<=RSRQ (dB)<-11 -11 20.93%
-Infinity RSRQ (dB)<-14 -14 6.35%

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.11 PS DL Throughput
Figure 11 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result
Min Value (Mbps) DL Throughput (Mbps) Max Value (Mbps) Percentage (%) Legend
30 DL Throughput (Mbps)>=30 Infinity 11.97%
10 10<=DL Throughput (Mbps)<30 30 37.65%
0 0<DL Throughput (Mbps)<3 3 19.57%
PS DL Drive Test Target PAC Result Status

Pass With
No low DL throughput ( < 3 Mbps) near site ( ± 300m) Found
Justification
*PS DL Throughput test do in normal mode without cell bar.

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.12 PS UL Throughput
Figure 12 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result
Min Value (Mbps) UL Throughput (Mbps) Max Value (Mbps) Percentage (%) Legend
15 UL Throughput (Mbps)>=15 Infinity 48.18%
10 10<=UL Throughput (Mbps)<15 15 18.44%
0 0<UL Throughput (Mbps)<3 3 13.73%
PS UL Drive Test Target PAC Result Status

No low DL throughput ( < 3 Mbps) near site ( ± 300m) Found Pass With Justification
*PS UL Throughput test do in normal mode without cell bar.

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.13 Transmission Modes Plot
Note: provided for information only
Figure 20: Transmission Mode Plot
MIMO Check Result

eNB ID eNB Name ID
Design Implementation
543346 LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN 4 MIMO MIMO

544213 LTE_KARANG_LANGIT 4 MIMO MIMO
543911 LTE_JARSARI 4 MIMO MIMO
543910 LTE_PlembonBanjarejo 4 SIMO SIMO
543643 LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 4 MIMO MIMO
543903 LTE_MENONGO 4 SIMO SIMO

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

543820 LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP 4 SIMO SIMO
543198 LTE_SUKODADI 4 SIMO SIMO
544100 LTE_BULULMNGAN 4 MIMO MIMO
3.2.14 Channel Bandwidth Plot
Note: provided for information only
Figure 13: Channel Bandwidth Plot
3.2.15 Event Failed
No event failed found.
Event.csv

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.16 Sleeping Cell Identification
Cellname RACH SR (%) Status

96.17% No Sleeping Cell
3.2.17 External Interference Identification

No external interference is found Not found Information only
LuInterference.xlsx

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.18 Cell Overshooting

No Found site overshooting
Inter Site
Distance Overshooting
Site name Cell name Target Remark
Factor
(KM)
LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN SB4G18_4542743E_4 >=80%
LTE_KARANG_LANGIT SB4G18_454F204E_4 >=80%
LTE_JARSARI SB4G18_4542135E_4 >=80%
LTE_PlembonBanjarejo SB4G18_4542870E_4 >=80%
LTE_GRESIK_BABAT SB4G18_4543256E_4 >=80%
LTE_MENONGO SB4G18_4543238E_4 >=80%
LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP SB4G18_4542876E_4 >=80%
LTE_SUKODADI SB4G18_4541788E_4 >=80%
LTE_BULULMNGAN SB4G18_454EB10E_4 >=80%

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.19 Bad Spot analysis and Improvement

Pass with
All bad spots are improved 7 badspot remain with justification
justification
Spot Spot Type Root Cause Longitude Latitude Action taken
Bad Badspot Coverage & Quality due

Need Propose physical tunning site
Spot 1 RSRP,SINR,DL, to blocking by hills and blocking 112.282111 -7.060950
454EB10E_LTE_BULULMNGAN
UL contour
Bad Need Propose physical tunning site

Badspot Coverage & Quality due
Spot 2 RSRP,SINR,DL, 112.295475 -7.069724 454EB10E_LTE_BULULMNGAN,
to blocking by contour
UL 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP
Bad Coverage and quality due to

Bad
to no dominant serving from site Need Propose physical tunning site
Spot 3 RSRP,SINR,DL, 112.316308 -7.07640
4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SW 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP
UL
AP and distance 1.8km from site
to backlobe from site
Bad Need Propose physical tunning site
4542135E_LTE_JARSARI and no
Spot 4 RSRP,SINR,DL, 112.331978 -7.062066 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP and
dominant serving from site
UL 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI
4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SW
AP
Bad to no dominant serving from site Need Propose physical tunning site
Spot 5 112.337121 -7.075842
RSRP,SINR,UL 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI and 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI
distance 1.8km from site
Bad Coverage and quality this
Bad area due to no dominant serving
Need propose physical tunning site
Spot 6 RSRP,SINR,DL, from site 112.334021 -7.130405
4543238E_LTE_MENONGO
UL 4543238E_LTE_MENONGO and
backlobe from site

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarej
o
Need propose physical tunning site

Bad 4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo and
to no dominant serving from site
Spot 7 RSRP,SINR,DL, 112.362706 -7.130165 site
4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarej
UL 4542743E_LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONG
o and distance 2.7 km from site
AN
3.2.19.1 Bad spot on RSRP
RSRP BEFORE RSRP AFTER
System Level Colour Before After

DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 13.86%
-90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 11.28%
-100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 38.40%
LTE -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 14.94%
-115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 16.27%
DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 5.25%
RSRP ≥ -105 78.48%
3.2.19.2 Bad Spot on SINR
SINR BEFORE SINR AFTER


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
System Level Colour Before After
SINR (dB)>=20 9.83%

10<=SINR (dB)<20 33.01%
3<=SINR (dB)<10 31.59%
LTE 0<=SINR (dB)<3 12.09%
-5<=SINR (dB)<0 10.60%
SINR (dB)<-5 2.88%
SINR ≥ 3 74.43%
3.2.19.3 Bad Spot on DL Throughput
DL BEFORE DL AFTER

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
System DL Throughput (Mbps) Colour Before After

DL Throughput (Mbps) >= 30 11.97%
10 <= DL Throughput (Mbps) < 30 37.65%
LTE
DL Throughput (Mbps) ≥ 5 69.86%
3.2.19.4 Bad Spot on UL throughput
UL BEFORE UL AFTER
System UL Throughput (Mbps) Colour Before After

UL Throughput (Mbps) >= 15 48.18%
10 <= UL Throughput (Mbps) < 15 18.44%
LTE
UL Throughput (Mbps) ≥ 5 86.27%

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Physical Tuning Summary
NEW SITE AND 1st TIER NEIGHBOR SITE BEFORE FINAL

LONG LAT TAC BW
eNB ID Site Name Cell ID TYPE H/AZ/E/M H/AZ/E/M
543346 LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN 4 112.38222 -7.12217 55540 20MHz Outdoor 57.7/100/0/2 57.7/100/0/2
544213 LTE_KARANG_LANGIT 4 112.34987 -7.09709 55540 15MHz Outdoor 41.5/60/3/3 41.5/60/3/3
543911 LTE_JARSARI 4 112.3410806 -7.060169444 55540 15MHz Outdoor 42/45/-/4 42/45/-/4
543910 LTE_PlembonBanjarejo 4 112.34 -7.138219444 55540 10MHz Outdoor 30/60/4/6 30/60/4/6
543643 LTE_GRESIK_BABAT 4 112.3298472 -7.092361111 55540 15MHz Outdoor 42/30/-/2 42/30/-/2
543903 LTE_MENONGO 4 112.325 -7.11375 55540 10MHz Outdoor 45/20/-/5 45/20/-/5
543820 LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP 4 112.31395 -7.06059 55540 10MHz Outdoor 50/90/0/2 50/90/0/2
3.2.1 Parameter Tuning Summary
No Parameter tuning or optimization done since the coverage already follow RF design &
parameter standard (CDD) already implemented sucscessfully.
4 NMS KPI RAN LTE TREND

Availability Session Setup Success Rate

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Cell AvailabilityRate is maintained above Session Setup Success Rate is maintained above
reference value99% reference value99%
RRC Setup Success Rate Session Abnormal Release Rate
RRC Setup Success Rate is maintained above Session Abnormal Release Rate is maintained
reference value 98% below reference value 1.4 %
UL/DL PDCP Packet Loss UL/DL Average Cell Throughput
Cell DL Throughput Average is 14Mbps, Cell UL

PDPCP UL/DL Packet Loss performance is below
Throughput Average is 4 Mbps.(Only for
reference value 1e-3.
Information)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
HOSR Intra-frequency IRAT-HO SR
Handover Success Rate Intra Frequency is Handover Success Rate Inter RAT Frequency is
maintained above reference value 98.00% maintained above reference value 95.00%
Processor Load 3G HSDPA users vs LTE RRC users
eNodeB processor load maximum is lower 3G and LTE User Number actually no issue.
below reference value 70.00 %. (Only for Information)
3G vs LTE Payload Trend (Daily sum in GB) 3G throughput vs LTE throughput (BH)
Payload actually no issue (only for information) Throughput actually no issue(only for information)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Figure 23: NMS KPI Trend
5 KPI 2G & 3G
Drive Test is out of LTE vendor scope of work, hence the 2G & 3G DT KPI would be reviewed
during quarterly Drive Test with PTHS. Therefore, the 2G & 3G aspect only review the NMS
KPI, plus MRR data of 3G in PAC report.
The target for NMS KPI is maintained of improved, comparing the best week (within 3 weeks)
after Frequency Carving/TRX Shutdown versus the week when PAC is collected.
2G & 3G nodes involved are applicable for nodes which are inside LTE polygon, regardless
they have collocated LTE installed or not. All KPI, except availability are calculated during
busy hour-payload UL+DL daily, averaged within a week. Availability is monitored 24 hr
daily.
5.1 List of 2G, 3G & LTE sites inside LTE Polygon

Item Target PAC Result Status
Site List 2G & 3G inside the polygon is Must be matched
Match Pass
matched with actual with actual

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
5.2 NMS 2G
KPI Baseline Week 1 PAC Week 2 Comments
Assignment Success Rate 11.77% 11.77% Maintain
Perceive Drop Rate 99.77% 99.77% Maintain
Perceive Congestion Rate 148.33% 148.33% Maintain
SDCCH Drop Rate 0.00% 0.00% Maintain
SDCCH Congestion Rate 11.77% 11.77% Maintain
SDCCH Success Rate 2.46% 2.46% Maintain
TBF Failure Rate 9997.53% 9997.53% Maintain
Cell Availability 9889.54% 9889.54% Maintain
HO Success Rate 0.77% 0.77% Maintain
* Fill comment with: Degraded or Maintained or Improved according to current week compared with baseline
5.3 NMS 3G
KPI Baseline Week 1 PAC Week 2 Comments
RRC Success Rate 11.77% 11.77% Maintain
Speech Access Rate 99.77% 99.77% Maintain
PS Access Rate 148.33% 148.33% Maintain
Speech Drop Rate 0.00% 0.00% Maintain
PS Drop Rate 11.77% 11.77% Maintain
RAB Congestion 2.46% 2.46% Maintain
Cell Availability 9997.53% 9997.53% Maintain
CS IRAT-HO SR 9889.54% 9889.54% Maintain
5.4 MRR 3G
During LTE Optimization process, some physical tuning might be executed to enhance LTE quality.
While in some sites, the antenna is shared between 3G and LTE. Therefore, LTE vendor must provide
the MRR before and after physical tuning is executed. The CPICH RSCP must be maintained, or if due
to less sample, the deviation of 2% is accepted.
5.4.1 MRR RSCP
RSCP Plot

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
RSCP Range MR Number Percentage (%)

(-65.00_Inf] 26 0%
(-75.00_-65.00] 78 1%
(-85.00_-75.00] 429 6%
(-95.00_-85.00] 2539 34%
(-Inf_-95.00] 4305 58%
Total 7377 100%
Reference MR Number CAC Result Status

RSCP ≥ -95 dBm 3072 41.64% Only for Information
EcIo Plot

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
EcIo Range MR Number Percentage (%)

(-4.00_Inf] 29 0.40%
(-8.00_-4.00] 1084 14.96%
(-12.00_-8.00] 4693 64.76%
(-16.00_-12.00] 1379 19.03%
(-Inf_-25.00] 62 0.86%
Total 7247 100.00%
Reference MR Number CAC Result Status

EcIo ≥ -12 dB 5806 80.12% Only for Information
6 FEATURE
PAC acceptance validates the feature state on each RAN LTE nodes. The validation refers to Bill of Quantity
stated in Purchased Order with the actual feature status on the node. The feature may be applicable on the cell
level, site level (eNB) or RRC Connected user level. Each LTE vendor may have their own feature ID.
We define 2 type of feature:
- Basic: standard deliverables on each product package
- Optional: selectable feature chosen by customer.


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
RECOMME
FEATURE FEATURE BoQ Current
FEATURES FEATURE ID NDED
DOMAIN TYPE Checking Status
BASELINE
CS Fallback to UTRAN LOFD-001033 RF Optional YES ON ON
CS Fallback to GERAN LOFD-001034 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
CS Fallback with LAI to
LOFD-001069 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
GERAN
LoCation Services(LCS) LOFD-001047 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Support of UE
LOFD-001030 RF Optional YES ON ON
Category2/3/4
Enhanced Scheduling LOFD-001015 RF Optional YES ON ON
Active Queue
LOFD-001027 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
Management(AQM)
Enhanced Admission
Control
PS Inter-RAT Mobility
between E-UTRAN and LOFD-001020 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
GERAN
Security Mechanism LOFD-001010 Product Optional YES ON ON
Temporary Temporar
Intra-LTE Load Balancing LOFD-001032 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intra-LTE User Number Temporary Temporar
LOFD-070215 RF Optional YES
Load Balancing OFF y OFF
PS Inter-RAT Mobility
between E-UTRAN and LOFD-001019 RF Optional YES ON ON
UTRAN
RObust Header Temporary Temporar
Compression (ROHC) OFF y OFF
Flash CS Fallback to
UTRAN
Flash CS Fallback to
GERAN
Temporary Temporar
Flexible User Steering LOFD-001054 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Inter-RAT Load Sharing
to UTRAN
UL Interference
Rejection Combining
Automatic Neighbour
Relation(ANR)
Self-configuration LOFD-002004 Product Optional YES ON ON
PCI Collision Detection &
Self-Optimization
Mobility Robust
Optimization (MRO)
Remote Electrical Tilt
LOFD-001024 Product Optional YES Scene On Scene On
Control

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
RECOMME
BASELINE
RIM Based LTE Target Temporary Temporar
Cell Selection OFF y OFF
DL 2x2 MIMO LOFD-001001 RF Optional YES ON ON
Enhanced Transmission
LOFD-003011 Product Optional YES ON ON
QoS Management
IP Performance Temporary Temporar
LOFD-003012 Product Optional YES
Monitoring OFF y OFF
S1 and X2 over IPv6 LOFD-003017 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
IPsec LOFD-003009 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Public Key
LOFD-003010 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Infrastructure(PKI)
Integrated Firewall LOFD-003014 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
S1-flex LOFD-001018 Product Optional YES ON ON
2G/3G and LTE Co-
transmission
UL 64QAM LOFD-001006 RF Optional YES ON ON
Inter-RAT ANR LOFD-002002 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
RACH Optimization LOFD-002015 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
RF Channel Intelligent
Shutdown
PSU Intelligent Sleep
Mode
Temporary Temporar
UL 2x2 MU-MIMO LOFD-001002 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intra-eNodeB UL CoMP LOFD-001066 RF Optional YES ON ON
LOFD-
CQI Adjustment RF Optional YES ON ON
00101501
LOFD-
Dynamic Scheduling RF Optional YES ON ON
00101502
Control Channel IRC LOFD-001094 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
CS Fallback with LAI to
UTRAN
Temporary Temporar
SRVCC to UTRAN LOFD-001022 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intelligent Access Class
LOFD-070207 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
Control
IP Active Performance
Measurement
Dynamic Inter-Cell
Interference LOFD-001014 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
Coordination
LAOFD-
Static TDM eICIC RF Optional YES OFF OFF
002001

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
RECOMME
BASELINE
Temporary Temporar
TTI Bundling LOFD-001048 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
LAOFD-
FeICIC RF Optional YES OFF OFF
081234
SFN LOFD-003029 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
CPRI Compression LOFD-001076 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Cell Outage Detection
LOFD-002012 Product Optional YES ON ON
and Compensation
Enhanced
Synchronization
IPsec for IPv6 LOFD-003024 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Ethernet OAM LOFD-003004 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Antenna Fault Detection LOFD-002011 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Multi-mode BS Common
MRFD-231601 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Reference Clock
Below is the detail log file on feature validation:
Criteria Result Remark
Feature status matched with BoQ Match Pass


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
7 Issues, Recommendation and Exclusion

Below is the explanation of the KPI that does not meet the target.
7.1.1 Ping Latency 32bit
t1 t2 t3 t4
t1' t2' t3' t4'

UE eNodeB SGW PGW FTP
t1 ≈ t1’、t2 ≈ t2’、t3 ≈ t3’、t4 ≈ t4’

RTT = t1
Ping Latency (UE to FTP) = t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t4’ + t3’ + t2’ + t1’ = 42.00 ms (UE ping
Huawei FTP)
Ping Latency (eNodeB to SGW) = t2 + t2’ = 17 ms
Ping Latency(UE to FTP) − Ping Latency(eNodeB to SGW) 45.00−17

t1 +t3 +t4 = = = 14 ms
2 2
RTT = t1 = 2ms – t3 – t4 < 8ms (Target)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
7.1.2 Ping latency 1000bit
t1 t2 t3 t4
t1' t2' t3' t4'

UE eNodeB SGW PGW FTP
t1 ≈ t1’、t2 ≈ t2’、t3 ≈ t3’、t4 ≈ t4’

RTT = t1
Ping Latency (UE to FTP) = t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t4’ + t3’ + t2’ + t1’ = 50.40ms (UE ping
Huawei FTP)
Ping Latency (eNodeB to SGW) = t2 + t2’ = 17 ms
Ping Latency(UE to FTP) − Ping Latency(eNodeB to SGW) 60.40−17

t1 +t3 +t4 = = = 21.7ms
2 2
RTT = t1 = 4.2ms – t3 – t4 < 8ms (Target)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
7.2 KPI 2G & 3G
KPI 2G & 3G are maintained
7.3 Justification
Badspot Coverage & Quality due to

Bad RSRP, SINR, Need Propose physical tunning site
Spot 1 blocking by hills and blocking 112.282111 -7.060950
DL, UL 454EB10E_LTE_BULULMNGAN
contour

Need Propose physical tunning site
Bad RSRP, SINR, Badspot Coverage & Quality due to
Spot 2 112.295475 -7.069724 454EB10E_LTE_BULULMNGAN,
DL, UL blocking by contour
4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

Bad Coverage and quality due to to no
Bad RSRP, SINR, dominant serving from site Need Propose physical tunning site
Spot 3 112.316308 -7.07640
DL, UL 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP and 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP
distance 1.8km from site

Bad Coverage and quality due to to
backlobe from site Need Propose physical tunning site
Bad RSRP,
Spot 4 SINR, DL, UL
4542135E_LTE_JARSARI and no dominant 112.331978 -7.062066 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP
serving from site and 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI
4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

Bad Coverage and quality due to to no
Bad RSRP, dominant serving from site Need Propose physical tunning
Spot 5 112.337121 -7.075842
SINR, UL 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI and distance site 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI
1.8km from site

Bad Coverage and quality this area due to
no dominant serving from site
Bad RSRP, SINR, Need propose physical tunning site
Spot 6 4543238E_LTE_MENONGO and backlobe 112.334021 -7.130405
DL, UL 4543238E_LTE_MENONGO
from site
4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

Bad Coverage and quality due to to no Need propose physical tunning site
Bad RSRP, dominant serving from site 4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo and
Spot 7 112.362706 -7.130165
SINR, DL, UL 4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo and site
distance 2.7 km from site 4542743E_LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN
8 Conclusions
We conclude that PAC of Cluster EJ_TBN_4G_SHB2_NAE_310 is:
Pass, without note 

Pass, with note 
Not pass 
*Tick one appropriate result

Cac HW Ej TBN 4G SHB2 Nae 310 Lte 20181210 V1

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Cac HW Ej TBN 4G SHB2 Nae 310 Lte 20181210 V1

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

LTE NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 1 (47)

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

CLUSTER ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE

Cluster Name EJ_TBN_4G_SHB2_NAE_310

PT. HUAWEI SOM

Name: Achmad Fausi Name:

Date: 25 November 2018 Date:

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Figure 2: Drive Test Route ....................................................................................................................................... 9

Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route ............................................................................ 9

Figure 6: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result ................................................................................................................... 16

Figure 7: RSRP CDF Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 17

Figure 8: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result ..................................................................................................... 18

Figure 9: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test .............................................................................................................. 19

Figure 15 PCI Plot .................................................................................................................................................. 19

Figure 17 CQI Distribution Result .......................................................................................................................... 20

Figure 16 RSRQ Drive Test Result .......................................................................................................................... 21

Figure 18 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 22

Figure 19 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 23

Figure 21: Channel Bandwidth Plot ...................................................................................................................... 25

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

1.2 General Site Information

1.2.1 New Site Database

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier

543346 4542743E_LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN 4 112.382 -7.12217 55540 435 existing on air

543346 4542743E_LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN 5 112.382 -7.12217 55540 436 existing on air

543346 4542743E_LTE_SUKOMULYO_LAMONGAN 6 112.382 -7.12217 55540 437 existing on air

544213 454F204E_LTE_KARANG_LANGIT 4 112.35 -7.09709 55540 141 existing on air

544213 454F204E_LTE_KARANG_LANGIT 5 112.35 -7.09709 55540 142 existing on air

544213 454F204E_LTE_KARANG_LANGIT 6 112.35 -7.09709 55540 143 existing on air

543911 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI 4 112.341 -7.06017 55540 249 existing on air

543911 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI 5 112.341 -7.06017 55540 250 existing on air

543911 4542135E_LTE_JARSARI 6 112.341 -7.06017 55540 251 existing on air

543910 4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo 4 112.34 -7.13822 55540 207 existing on air

543910 4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo 5 112.34 -7.13822 55540 208 existing on air

543910 4542870E_LTE_PlembonBanjarejo 6 112.34 -7.13822 55540 209 existing on air

543903 4543238E_LTE_MENONGO 4 112.325 -7.11375 55540 336 existing on air

543903 4543238E_LTE_MENONGO 5 112.325 -7.11375 55540 337 existing on air

543903 4543238E_LTE_MENONGO 6 112.325 -7.11375 55540 338 existing on air

543820 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP 4 112.314 -7.06059 55540 9 existing on air

543820 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP 5 112.314 -7.06059 55540 10 existing on air

543820 4542876E_LTE_NGAMBENG_SWAP 6 112.314 -7.06059 55540 11 existing on air

543198 4541788E_LTE_SUKODADI 4 112.312 -7.09409 55540 78 existing on air

543198 4541788E_LTE_SUKODADI 5 112.312 -7.09409 55540 79 existing on air

543198 4541788E_LTE_SUKODADI 6 112.312 -7.09409 55540 80 existing on air

1.2.3 Punch List Database

There is no punch list at this Cluster.

Drive Test Methodology “Mobility Assessment”

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

RSRP, RSRQ, PCI 1 laptop, separated

1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment”

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Speedtest (OOKLA &

1.4 FTP Server Information

1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail

Figure 1: Cluster Map Information

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

2.1.1 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction

Figure 2: Drive Test Route

Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route