Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PAR
Aditya Kumar
Suisse
2012
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Karen Scrivener for giving me the
opportunity to work at LMC, for innumerable discussions and insightful comments and for
being a constant source of motivation. I would also like to thank the Doctoral school at EPFL
for accepting me as a Ph.D student and Swiss National Science Foundation (FNS) for proving
financial support for this research.
I would like to thank all my colleagues at LMC for offering plenty of help, advice and
feedback during the course of my Ph.D. Special thanks to Mercedes, Vanessa, Patrick, Amelie,
Caterina, Julien, Alexandra, Elise and Hui for letting me use their hard-earned experimental
results. Thanks to Patrick, Gaurav, Cyrille and Shashank for their criticisms and suggestions.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to all my friends (Julien S., Julien B., Mathieu,
Hui, Olga, Ruzena, Arnaud, John, Theo, Alexandra, Quang Huy, Christoff, Cedric, Elise,
Alain, Mohamed, Berta, Pavel, Cheng, Amelie, Adrian) at LMC for including me in their
“group” and outside-laboratory activities, which I thoroughly enjoyed being a part of. Thanks
to the Administrative (Sandra, Anne-Sandra, Maude, Marie-Alix) and Technical (Lionel) staff
for helping me with all kinds of stuff. Thanks to everyone in the lab for being very friendly to
me.
Page Number: 2
Abstract
The modeling platform μic has been extended to study the hydration of cement based
systems. It is shown that the hydration kinetics of alite can be described through the
implementation of two mechanisms: a solution controlled dissolution (SCD) mechanism for
the first two stages of hydration and nucleation and densifying growth (NDG) of products for
the last three stages of hydration. The dissolution rate is varied according to the ratio
between the ion activity product and the equilibrium solubility product. The solution
concentrations are computed directly from the amount of alite dissolved taking into account
the amount of water present and the amount of products formed, with activities and complex
ions formation according to standard thermodynamic rules. Saturation index calculations are
implemented to compute the time of precipitation of C-S-H and portlandite individually. After
the precipitation of portlandite, the rate controlling mechanism is switched to nucleation and
densifying growth. C-S-H grown in a diffuse manner in which the packing density increases
with hydration. The overall heat-evolution profile is obtained by combination of heat evolved
as obtained from the SCD and NDG mechanisms.
The approach is used to describe the influence of particle sizes, thermal treatment, mixing
conditions and additions of alkali hydroxides, alkali sulfates and gypsum on hydration of alite.
Through a study of systems with wide variations in the process parameters, it is shown that
the hydration kinetics of alite can be generically described using the combination of SCD and
NDG mechanisms and a limited number of fit parameters. The results obtained from
simulations were found to be in good agreement with a variety of experimental results. The
various simulations parameters are shown to be strongly correlated to the initial states of the
systems.
Using the combination of mechanisms that describe hydration of alite and aluminate, a model
Page Number: 3
is presented to describe the hydration of multi-phase systems. Preliminary simulations of the
heat-evolution profiles of alite-aluminate-gypsum and commerical cementitous systems are
presented. Good agreement was found between the simulated and measured results.
The current study demonstrates the versatility of μic and shows that the use of mechanistic,
rather than empirical, rules can be an important tool to achieve better understanding of
cement hydration.
Page Number: 4
Résumé
La plateforme de modélisation μic a été étendue pour étudier l'hydratation des systèmes
cimentaires. Il est montré que la cinétique de l'hydratation de l'alite peut être décrite grâce à
la mise en œuvre de deux mécanismes : un mécanisme de dissolution contrôlée par la solution
(SCD) pour les deux premières étapes de l'hydratation et un mécanisme de nucléation,
croissance et densification (NDG) des produits hydratés pour les trois dernières étapes. Le
taux de dissolution est varié en fonction du rapport entre le produit d'activité ionique et le
produit de solubilité à l'équilibre. Les concentrations des solutions sont calculées directement à
partir de la quantité d'alite dissoute en tenant compte de la quantité d'eau présente et la
quantité de produits formés, et en utilisant les activités et les règles usuelles de la
thermodynamique de formation de complexes ioniques. Des calculs d'indice de saturation sont
mis en œuvre pour déterminer individuellement le temps de la précipitation des CSH et de la
portlandite. Après la précipitation de la portlandite, le mécanisme dominant devient la
nucléation, croissance et densification. Les CSH croissent de manière diffuse et leur la
compacité augmente avec l'hydratation. Le profil de la chaleur globale est obtenu par
combinaison de la chaleur obtenue à partir de chacun des mécanismes SCD et NDG.
L'approche est utilisée pour décrire l'influence de la taille des particules, du traitement
thermique, des conditions de mélange, et des ajouts d'hydroxydes alcalins, de sulfates alcalins
et de gypse sur l'hydratation de l'alite. L'étude de nombreux systèmes dont les paramètres
varient fortement montre que la cinétique de l'hydratation de l'alite peut être décrite de façon
générique en utilisant combinant les mécanismes SCD et NDG, et un nombre limité de
paramètres de calage. Les résultats obtenus à partir des simulations ont été jugés en bon
accord avec une variété de résultats expérimentaux. Les différents paramètres des simulations
sont fortement corrélés à l'état initial des systèmes.
Page Number: 5
En utilisant la combinaison des mécanismes qui décrivent l'hydratation des aluminates et de
l'alite, un modèle est présenté pour décrire l'hydratation des systèmes polyphasés. Des
simulations préliminaires de profils de chaleur de systèmes alite-aluminate-gypse et de
systèmes cimentaires commerciaux sont présentés. Un bon accord a été trouvé entre les
résultats simulés et mesurés.
Page Number: 6
Table of Contents
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................2
Résumé........................................................................................................................................4
Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................6
Glossary.....................................................................................................................................10
Chapter 1: Introduction.............................................................................................................15
Chapter 2: Cement Hydration- Literature Review....................................................................19
2.0 Cement: Basic Principles.....................................................................................................19
2.1 Alite: Background and Fundamentals.................................................................................21
2.2 Alite: Hydration and Kinetics..............................................................................................21
2.3 Alite Hydration: Dissolution and Induction Period.............................................................22
2.3.1 Metastable barrier hypothesis.......................................................................................23
2.3.2 Nucleation and Growth.................................................................................................26
2.3.3 Solution controlled dissolution......................................................................................26
2.4 Alite Hydration: Acceleration and Deceleration Periods.....................................................30
2.4.1 Nucleation and growth of C-S-H with uniform density................................................30
2.4.1.1 Avrami N&G model: Definition.............................................................................30
2.4.1.2 Boundary N&G model: Definition.........................................................................31
2.4.1.3 Studies based on Avrami and Boundary N&G models using uniform density of C-
S-H....................................................................................................................................32
2.4.2 Diffusion based mechanism beyond the heat-rate peak................................................35
2.4.3 Nucleation and densifying growth of C-S-H ................................................................36
2.5 Alite Hydration: Stage V.....................................................................................................39
2.6 Microstructural modeling of cement hydration kinetics .....................................................40
2.6.1 DuCOM........................................................................................................................40
2.6.2 The Jennings+Johnson model......................................................................................41
2.6.3 HymoStruc model.........................................................................................................41
2.6.4 CemHyd3D model.........................................................................................................42
2.6.5 HydratiCA simulation model........................................................................................44
2.6.6 Integrated Particle Kinetics Model (IPKM).................................................................45
2.6.7 μic modeling platform..................................................................................................46
2.7 Current Study......................................................................................................................50
Chapter 3: Simulation Techniques for Alite Hydration ...........................................................51
3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................51
3.2 Basics of µic ........................................................................................................................54
3.3 Solution controlled dissolution (SCD).................................................................................57
3.4 Activity calculations ...........................................................................................................59
3.5 C-S-H precipitation ...........................................................................................................61
Page Number: 7
3.6 Portlandite precipitation ....................................................................................................66
3.7 Calibration of parameters for SCD regime .........................................................................67
3.8 Evolution of calcium and silicate concentrations and C-S-H during SCD regime ..............72
3.9 Nucleation and Densifying Growth (NDG) Regime ...........................................................73
3.10 Sensitivity of the NDG parameters ...................................................................................77
3.11 Transition from SCD to NDG regimes .............................................................................78
3.12 Determination of simulation parameters............................................................................82
3.13 Validation of the SCD mechanism.....................................................................................83
Chapter 4: Studying the Effects of Process Parameters............................................................86
4.1 Effect of particle surface area..............................................................................................86
4.1.1 Materials and methods..................................................................................................86
4.1.2 Simulating the effect of surface area.............................................................................89
4.2 Effect of mixing conditions..................................................................................................95
4.2.1 Materials and methods..................................................................................................95
4.2.2 Simulations: Effects of mixing conditions.....................................................................97
4.3 Effect of thermal treatment of alite...................................................................................110
4.3.1 Materials and methods................................................................................................110
4.3.2 Effect of thermal treatment: Measured heat evolution profiles..................................111
4.3.3 Simulating the effect of thermal treatment of alite....................................................114
4.4 Effect of alkali hydroxide addition.....................................................................................121
4.4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................121
4.4.2 Materials production and compositional information.................................................121
4.4.3 Simulating the effect of particle size distribution on alite hydration.........................123
4.4.4 Effect of alkali hydroxide additions: Experimental results.........................................125
4.4.5 Simulating the influence of the initial solution pH on alite dissolution......................127
4.4.6 Simulating the pre-acceleration period.......................................................................129
4.4.7 Simulating the Acceleration and Deceleration periods...............................................131
4.4.8 Studying the changes in structure and morphology of C-S-H....................................136
4.5 Effect of gypsum addition..................................................................................................139
4.5.1 Materials and Methods...............................................................................................139
4.5.2 Influence of gypsum addition: Measured heat evolution profiles................................139
4.5.3 Simulating the influence of gypsum addition on alite hydration................................141
4.6 Effect of alkali sulfate addition .....................................................................................150
4.6.1 Introduction................................................................................................................150
4.6.2 Materials and methods................................................................................................150
4.6.3 Effect of alkali sulfates addition: Measured heat evolution profiles...........................151
4.6.4 Simulating the evolution of ionic concentrations........................................................153
4.6.5 Simulating the heat evolution profiles........................................................................157
Chapter 5: Perspectives on Modeling Alite Hydration............................................................163
Page Number: 8
5.1 Transition from SCD to NDG mechanism.........................................................................163
5.2 Variation in the NDG parameters.....................................................................................165
5.3 Effect of space-filling on hydration kinetics.......................................................................166
5.4 Densification, phase-arrangement and growth criterion of C-S-H.....................................168
Chapter 6: Modeling Hydration of C3A+Gypsum and Multi-phase Cementitous Systems....171
6.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................171
6.2 C3A+Gyspum+H systems: Basics ....................................................................................171
6.2.1 Aluminate Hydration: Kinetics of hydration during 1st stage....................................173
6.2.2 Aluminate Hydration: Kinetics of hydration during 2nd stage..................................174
6.3 C3A+H2O+Gypsum systems: Simulations........................................................................175
6.3.1 Preliminary simulations for C3A+H2O+Gypsum systems: Stage 1 .........................176
6.3.2 Preliminary simulations for C3A+H2O+Gypsum systems: Stage 2 .........................179
6.3.3 Conclusions: Preliminary simulations for C3A+H2O+Gypsum systems...................185
6.4 Simulating hydration of multi-phase cementitous systems................................................185
Chapter 7: Conclusions and Perspectives................................................................................194
7.1 Dissolution of alite.............................................................................................................194
7.2 Effects of process parameters of alite hydration................................................................195
7.3 Hydration of C3A+Gypsum systems.................................................................................197
7.4 Perspectives on microstructural modeling ........................................................................197
7.5 Perspectives on thermodynamic modeling.........................................................................198
7.6 Perspectives on simulating multi-phase systems................................................................199
Page Number: 9
Glossary
Page Number: 10
Abbreviations
AU Arbitrary units
BET Brunauer, Emmett and Teller theory
BSE Back-Scattered Electrons
BWI Bound water index
CV Computational volume
EDS Energy dispersive spectroscopy
FEM Finite elements method
NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance
NDG Nucleation and densifying growth
NG Nucleation and growth
N&G Nucleation and growth
OPC Ordinary Portland cement
PSD Particle size distribution
QENS Quasi-electron neutron scattering
QXRD Quantitative X-ray diffraction analyses
REV Representative elementary volume
SCD Solution controlled dissolution
SEM Scanning electron microscopy
TEM Transmission electron microscopy
TGA Thermo-gravimetric analysis
w/c Water to cement ratio
w/s Water to solid ratio
XRD X-ray diffraction
Page Number: 11
List of symbols (In the order of appearance in the manuscript)
Symbol Context Description
Vphase Hydration Volume of phase
Q Hydration Heat flow rate
H Hydration Enthalpy
dmphase Hydration Change in mass of phase
t Hydration Time or age
IAP Thermodynamics Ion activity product
Ksp Thermodynamics Solubility product
β Thermodynamics Ratio of IAP to Ksp
SI Thermodynamics Saturation Index
I Thermodynamics Ionic strength
γ Thermodynamics Activity coefficient
aphase Thermodynamics Activity of species “phase”
AT Thermodynamics Debye-Huckel Temperature constant I
BT Thermodynamics Debye-Huckel Temperature constant II
ai Thermodynamics Kielland ion-specific parameter
bi Thermodynamics Kielland ion-specific parameter
T Thermodynamics Temperature
mspecies Thermodynamics Molality of species
zspecies Thermodynamics Unit charge of ionic species
kdiss Alite dissolution Dissolution rate constant
βmax Alite dissolution Critical alite undersaturation constant
βalite Alite dissolution Alite undersaturation (IAPalite/Ksp-alite)
cstep retreat Alite dissolution Step retreat constant
aSSA Alite dissolution Specific surface area of particles
{} AliteDissolution Activity
[] Alite Dissolution Concentration
Vreal NDG Volume of products without impingements
Page Number: 12
Vextended NDG Volume of products with impingements
Af NDG Area fraction covered by products
ρ NDG Density of phase
ρ0 NDG Base density of C-S-H
ρmin NDG Minimum or initial density of Outer C-S-H
ρmax NDG Final density of Outer C-S-H
Idensity NDG Number of nuclei of Outer C-S-H per unit area
Gout NDG Outward Growth rate of the nuclei of the product
Gpar NDG Growth rate of the nuclei along the surface
Irate NDG Rate of nucleation of C-S-H per unit area
kden NDG Rate of densifictation of outer C-S-H
t0 NDG Start time of NDG
Ndensity NDG Nucleation density coefficient (Idensity. Gpar2)
Nrate NDG Nucleation rate coefficient (Irate. Gpar2)
aBV NDG Surface area of particles per unit volume of water initially
dmC3A Ettringite formation Change in mass of C3A
aSA Ettringite formation Surface area of C3A particle
k1 Ettringite formation Rate constant
k2 Ettringite formation Rate constant
r0,i Ettringite formation Initial radius of C3A particle
aSSA Ettringite formation Specific surface area of particles
X Monosulfate formation Fraction of C3A reacted
Vextended Monosulfate formation Extended volume of monosulfate
tr Monosulfate formation Age of product (monosulfate)
tmono Monosulfate formation Start time of monosulfate formation kinetics
Gout Monosulfate formation Outward growth rate
Ndensity Monosulfate formation Nucleation density coefficient (Idensity. Gpar2)
Nrate Monosulfate formation Nucleation rate coefficient (Irate. Gpar2)
aBV Monosulfate formation Area of C3A particles divided by volume of water
Page Number: 13
falite Multi-phase hydration Fraction of alite in cement
faluminate Multi-phase hydration Fraction of C3A in cement
Page Number: 14
Chapter 1: Introduction
This study presents a modeling approach using the microstructural modeling platform μic.
This platform uses uses the vector approach to represent the geometry of the microstructure.
In the vector approach particles with simple geometry are used to represent the system and at
each step of the simulation the position and the size of the particles are stored. Due to its
flexible design, the users of the platform can define custom materials, particles and reactions,
and control the development of the microstructure by defining laws that define the
mechanisms of the reactions. The versatility of μic allows users to model many different
particulate growth systems not limited to cement hydration.
In this study, the modeling platform μic has been extended to study the effect of various
process parameters that influence the hydration kinetics of cement based systems. The
influence of: particle sizes, mixing conditions and heat treatment at different temperatures
and different durations and additions of: alkali hydroxides, alkali sulfates, and gypsum have
been studied. Comparisons against a variety of experimental results are done for validation. A
model to describe the hydration of aluminate+gypsum systems studying the effects of
composition and particle size distribution is described. Using the mechanisms to describe
hydration kinetics of model alite and aluminate systems, simulations for several multi-phase
systems are also described. The results and discussions on the variable simulation parameters
provide significant insights into the mechanisms that drive the hydration of clinker phases
and highlight the gaps in our understanding of these mechanisms.
The main problem that researchers encounter in their study of cement-based systems is the
confluence of several interactions that occur between the ionic species in the pore-solution and
solid phases during hydration at different rates, at different points in time and for different
durations. Most of our understanding of mechanisms driving cement hydration depend on
interpretation of indirect experimental techniques, and therefore, there exists a knowledge gap
between the values and trends obtained from experiments and their physical meanings. A few
computational techniques have been used in the last few decades to bridge this gap and
provide theories and hypotheses that can explain the mechanisms behind the hydration
process. Numerical models use combinations of fundamental processes and empirical concepts
to simulate systems and processes. Model are devised so as to describe the behavior of smaller
and discrete sub-systems and the interactions between these sub-system units. By integration
of these sub-systems, the behavior of the entire system can be evaluated. Numerical models
can, therefore, can be used as an important technique, which works in a complimentary
capacity to the experiments, in order to further our understanding of cement hydration.
Page Number: 15
Several numerical models have been developed to describe and quantify the hydration of
cement based systems. These models can be broadly classified into two categories:
Microstructure based models and Analytical models. Most of these models are based on
empirical methods and calibrations from experimental results. As a result of this, the
applicability of these models is restricted to validation and prediction of properties of a small
range of systems, the compositions of which are similar to the systems from which the
calibrations have been done. The implementation of fundamental mechanisms from the
ground-up is required to provide a generic and relatively accurate description of the hydration
process. For this, firstly, the model should offer flexibility to the developer to incorporate
custom mechanisms and rules without having to alter the model or program extensively.
Secondly, as calibrations of the input and process variables are mostly done on a trial-and-
error basis, the simulation time and the computational complexity of the model should also be
small. Lastly, the model should offer a wide range of output results so as to provide the user a
range of options to validate the mechanisms and parameters.
It is precisely for these reasons, μic was chosen as the model to study the hydration of
complex systems. μic provides a basic framework on the basis of which new mechanisms and
hypotheses can be programmed and described as “plugins”. Kinetics schemes such as
dissolution, precipitation of phases etc. can be described using mathematical expressions that
can be built upon time-discrete or finite difference schemes. The model offers support for
description of thermodynamic laws within the core, that can serve as a set of binary rules
describing the conditions for precipitation and dissolution. Ultimately, the model provides an
effective means to reconstruct three dimensional (3D) digital microstructure that evolve in a
temporal fashion. These microstructures can be analyzed to calculate different properties. The
output of the simulations constitute several results that can be compared against experimental
results for validation: heat evolution rate, volumes and amounts of phases, ionic
concentrations, porosity etc. The model and its applications will be described in the detail in
the following chapters.
The following chapters discuss the importance of numerical modeling in cement science,
highlight the key areas of research done in the field, discuss the simulation techniques
implemented in this study and present the results that can be obtained by the implementation
of the fundamental principles from different disciplines.
Page Number: 16
Chapter 2 discusses our current understanding of cement hydration and different approaches
used so far to elucidate the mechanisms that drive the hydration of cement-based systems and
evolution of the microstructure. The chapter provides a summary of the work done in the past
several years and discusses several significant strides that have been made both in
experimental techniques and in theoretical models in the intervening years. As the
mechanisms that drive hydration are different during different stages, the chapter has been
divided into sections categorized on the basis of “stage of reaction” to delineate the proposed
mechanisms and hypotheses that pertain specifically to the time-domain in question. The
modeling approaches implemented to study hydration have also been discussed independently
to illustrate the developments made in the past few years and to highlight the gaps in our
understanding or numerical implementation of mechanisms. The limitations of the theoretical
and numerical approaches are also presented that highlight the importance of developing a
new model, that combines the approaches from different disciplines into a unified approach
and can potentially be used to simulate hydration of complex systems without the need of
calibrations or fitting using a large set of empirical parameters.
Chapter 3 describes the simulation techniques implemented in the model. The approaches
used to describe hydration of alite during the early and late ages and their implementation in
the model are outlined. The chapter highlights the problems in some of the widely accepted
mechanisms and propose new hypotheses that are used to overcome these. The assumptions
and approximations made therein are also delineated to demonstrate the need for simplifying
the numerical approach and to outline prospective avenues for more rudimentary research in
the field of hydration of cement-based systems.
Chapter 4 describes the implementation of the model to study the effects of various process
parameters. As such, the effects of surface area of particles, mixing conditions, heat treatment,
and additions/substitutions of alkali hydroxides, alkali sulfates and gypsum on the hydration
of alite/C3S are described in individual sections. The simulation results are compared to
experimental results, isothermal calorimetry in particular. The variation in the simulation
parameters with respect to physical variables are also discussed to highlight the role of the
experimental process parameters towards influencing the hydration of alite/C 3S. Through
several examples, the chapter illustrates the versatility of the model and demonstrates the use
of one unified approach to describe hydration of alite/C 3S under the influence of different
variable process parameters and initial states of the system.
Page Number: 17
Chapter 5 discusses some of the limitations in the approach used to simulate hydration of
alite. Assumptions and approximations made in the model and suggestions and concepts to
further improve these aspects are delineated. Areas which are not covered in this study, such
as hydration of alite in high w/c ratio systems and non-spherical growth criteria of C-S-H, are
discussed with preliminary simulations. Suggestions for potential mechanisms which can be
incorporated in the future are also discussed.
Chapter 6 describes the hydration kinetics of aluminate (C 3A)- gypsum systems. Our current
understanding is highlighted through a short literature review of the recent work in the field
of hydration of model aluminate systems. The effects of particle size distributions and
composition on the reaction rate profiles are discussed using a series of experimental and
simulation results. The implementation of the mechanisms in the model are described with
mathematical formulations and illustrations of the sensitivity of the kinetic parameters. The
variation in the simulation parameters with respect to physical variables, related to the initial
or instantaneous state of the system, are also discussed. The chapter also includes preliminary
simulations for multi-phase systems, which are implemented by unifying concepts and
approaches from simulations of model alite and aluminate systems. The variation in the
kinetic parameters used for the multi-phase systems are discussed.
Chapter 7 presents a brief summary of all approaches used in the model. The variation of all
the simulation parameters across different systems are presented in a unified fashion to
correlate the numerical variables to the physical processes and the initial states of the
respective systems. Perspectives for the future numerical and experimental studies on cement
hydration are also presented.
Page Number: 18
Chapter 2: Cement Hydration- Literature Review
In this chapter, our current understanding of the cement hydration and the approaches used
to simulate it numerically are presented. In the past few years, several aspects of cement
science have been explored and described using a combination of experimental and numerical
approaches. Despite numerous advances made in the recent past, most of the existing models
rely heavily on empirical results, often limiting their applicability. The discussion identifies
the progress made in the recent years towards describing some of the important aspects of
hydration and highlights some of the key areas where a scope for major improvements exist.
Cement reacts with water in a process called hydration. Hydration leads to decrease in the
amount of the clinker phases and increase in the amounts of product phases. The overall
volume of solid phases increases while the volume of water decreases. The mixture of cement
and water, conventionally called cement paste, decreases in its overall volume and converts
into a stiff solid. The rate of reaction of the individual clinker phases differs from one to
Page Number: 19
another. Alite and aluminate phases react quickly whereas belite and ferrite react slowly and
for longer durations. The overall progress of hydration is generally monitored using the heat
flow as measured by isothermal calorimetry (DSC). Figure (2.1) shows the typical heat
evolution profile of ordinary Portland cement for the first 3 days. The curve can be broadly
divided into five stages.
Figure 2.1: Typical heat evolution curve (measured) of ordinary Portland cement system
against time until approximately 3 days of hydration.
The first stage is marked by a rapid evolution of heat for several minutes. This is generally
attributed to the initial rapid dissolution of alite and gypsum and a rapid hydration of the
aluminate phase [2]. A continuous low evolution of heat is observed in the second stage of the
process. This stage is referred to as the induction period or the dormant period. In stage 3,
the reaction accelerates for a few hours until a peak is reached. In stage 4, the rate of reaction
drops and begins decreasing monotonically that continues during stage 5 until the ultimate
degree of hydration is reached.
During the hydration of cement several reaction products called hydrates are formed that are
responsible for providing its binding properties and strength development. In the following
sections, the hydration of cement, alite and aluminate in particular, the development of its
microstructure and its reaction kinetics will be discussed.
Page Number: 20
2.1 Alite: Background and Fundamentals
Tricalcium silicate ((CaO)3SiO2 or C3S) is the primary constituent of a number of different
types of cement, including Ordinary Portland cement, white cement and oil-well cements [1].
Alite, which is an impure form of C 3S, contains small quantities of magnesium and aluminum
as part of its lattice structure. Reaction between alite and water produces calcium silicate
hydrate (C-S-H) and portlandite (CH or calcium hydroxide) as shown in Equation 2.1.
The equation (2.1) is exact for pure systems but the value of (x+y) are not known accurately
[3,4,5,1]. Unlike C-S-H, the structure, morphology and stoichiometry of portlandite are well-
known; it is reported to grow as large clusters or hexagonal platelets in the cement matrix
[6,7,8] depending on pore-solution composition and particle size distribution of cement. The
formation of C-S-H and portlandite is largely responsible for the setting and hardening of the
cement paste in addition to the development of its microstructure and strength [1,9]. For this
reason, the hydration of alite has been widely studied over the past 40 years or so with special
focus on reaction kinetics, phase chemistry and phase equilibria [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
However, a consensus has not been reached on the qualitative nature of the reaction
mechanisms, especially during the first several hours after mixing. The hydration of alite is
discussed in the next section.
Page Number: 21
Figure 2.2: Typical heat evolution curve and calcium concentration evolution in alite-model
systems until approximately 30 hours of hydration. From [20]
It should be noted that the classification of the reaction rate of alite into stages is only a
general one and depends heavily on the initial state of the system, as will be discussed in the
next chapters. The following sections will discuss the theories and mechanisms used to
describe the rate of hydration of alite during different stages. A detailed review of these
mechanisms can also be found in[21,22].
Page Number: 22
Ca3SiO5 + 3H2O = 3Ca2+ + H2SiO42- + 4OH- (2.2)
Several theories have been proposed to explain the hydration kinetics during the first two
stages. The majority of these studies focus on explaining the onset and the end of the
induction period. Some of the important mechanisms used to explain hydration of alite-based
systems in the first two stages are described below:
Page Number: 23
Figure 2.3: Si concentration versus Ca concentration collected from extensive literature
search and reported by Jennings[11]. The divergence of the plot to two distinct curves was
interpreted as the formation of the metastable C-S-H (upper curve) and C-S-H (lower curve)
in equilibrium with other phases.
Page Number: 24
Other evidence taken to suggest the metastable barrier hypothesis comes from Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance (NMR) studies conducted by Rodgers et al.[29]. Their study of the
hydration of C3S particles in suspension indicated the presence of silicate hydrate monomers,
which form a protective layer (calculated to be around 40 nm in thickness) and inhibit
dissolution of C3S during stage 1 causing the onset of the induction period. It was shown that
the hydrate monomers later dimerize to stable C-S-H and dissolution of C 3S is re-initiated
marking the end of the induction period. The analyses, however, do not confirm that the
spatial distribution of this layer is uniform and provides full surface coverage of the C 3S
particles, which would be a prerequisite for the rate of dissolution to slow down by two orders
of magnitude and cause the onset of the induction period.
Similar evidence of a metastable product was presented in a recent study by Bellmann et al.
[26], who reported observations of intermediate calcium silicate phase containing silicate
monomers, as also reported in previous studies [27,28,29,30]. The observations were made
using NMR analyses based on 29Si NMR on nano-sized (40 to 200 nm) C 3S particles in
suspension (w/c = 4000) and paste (w/c = 1.50) conditions hydrated for 5 minutes. The
interpretation of their data indicates the formation of a protective layer intermediate silicate
hydrate at very early ages. The authors postulated that this phase undergoes conversion into
stable C-S-H once the solution reaches close to portlandite supersaturation. However, their
study does not demonstrate that the intermediate phase has the requisite passivating
properties to reduce the rate of dissolution by two orders of magnitude. Furthermore,
Bellmann et al. also do not explain the correlation between the saturation of calcium ions in
the pore-solution and end of the induction period which would result in the transformation of
the silicate monomers to stable C-S-H.
The most serious drawback of a “blocking” layer on the C 3S surface, as stated earlier, is the
lack of direct experimental evidence. In order to effectively block hydration or restrict
diffusion of one or more species, the layer has to be (a) uniform, enclosing the surface almost
completely and (b) fairly dense, to block or restrict the diffusion of species. However, surface
analyses conducted on flat C3S surfaces under water using atomic force microscopy [31] and
alite in suspensions using scanning electron microscopy [20] have only revealed the formation
of isolated precipitates of C-S-H as opposed to a continuous layer of a hydrate, which
contradicts the premise for this hypothesis to be true.
Page Number: 25
2.3.2 Nucleation and Growth
The Nucleation and Growth theory postulates that the nature of the induction period is
related to steady formation of embryos of products. The end of the induction period is
attributed to the rapid growth of the pre-existing embryos and formation of new nuclei of
products causing the overall rate to rise again. Studies in cement science supporting this
theory can be divided into two classes: (a) studies claiming that the nucleation of portlandite
is rate determining at early ages [32] (b) studies claiming that the nucleation of C-S-H at
early ages is related the onset and end of the induction period [18,14,31,33].
The nucleation of portlandite was hypothesized as a cause for the induction period since the
peak in the calcium concentration evolution has been observed to coincide with the end of the
induction period, as reported in various studies [1,10]. However experiments of addition of
portlandite to hydrating C3S showed prolongation in the induction period as opposed to
shortening it [34,35]. This behavior can be explained using the solution controlled dissolution
theory, which will be described in the next section. The portlandite nucleation theory also
failed to explain the slow down in the dissolution of alite within the first few minutes.
Other studies have postulated that the steady formation of C-S-H nuclei during the induction
period controls the overall rate [14,18,31,33]. These studies report that there is no true
induction period but only a continuous rise in the rate of formation of C-S-H. According to
these studies, the induction period ends when these nuclei of C-S-H begin to grow rapidly.
However, these studies also fail to explain the decrease in the dissolution rate during stage 1
and the onset of the induction period; C-S-H starts forming minutes after alite begins to
dissolve [20,31] and there is no evidence to suggest that this would lead to the significant
decrease in dissolution rate of alite.
Page Number: 26
Step-retreats at pre-existing roughnesses. The evolution of the first two defects occurs at fast
dissolution rates and high undersaturations (far from equilibrium). Step-retreats drive the
dissolution at slow rates close to equilibrium conditions. The evolution of these defects is
shown in Figure (2.4).
(a) (b)
Figure 2.4 (a): a- two-dimensional vacancy islands created due to the nucleation of small pits
at surfaces with or without impurity, b- etch pit formation at dislocations and c- step retreat
taking place at pre-existing roughnesses. The image was adapted from [20].
(b) Schematic representation of evolution of defects on the surface of dissolving mineral as a
function of undersaturation and dissolution rate. The images correspond to dissolving quartz.
On the right extrema of the x-axis, equilibrium with respect to the quartz exists. The image
was adapted from [20].
Principles from the solution controlled dissolution theory have been applied to alite in a
recent study by Juilland in his doctoral study at EPFL and [20]. Using this theory, the
authors devised a set of fairly generic rules to describe dissolution of alite/C 3S as summarized
below:
1. Far from equilibrium and at high undersaturation, two-dimensional vacancy islands
and etch pits open at the surface
Page Number: 27
2. As dissolution progresses at high rates, undersaturation decreases very rapidly.
3. Beyond a critical minimum level of undersaturation, the driving force is insufficient to
create new etch pits.
4. At this low driving force and low undersaturation close to equilibrium conditions,
dissolution occurs primarily by a retreating step mechanism that is much slower.
Juilland et al.[20] also showed SEM images of unground alite surfaces hydrated in DI-water
and saturated lime solution confirming the importance of the initial undersaturation. Samples
hydrated in DI-water showed significant surface roughening with a prominent presence of etch
pits at early times of hydration (Figure 2.5a), whereas samples hydrating in saturated lime
solution preserved a smooth surface (Figure 2.5b). In DI-water with high initial
undersaturation, the driving force is sufficient to open up etch pits and drive dissolution at
high rates (as shown in Figure 2.5a). This progression of dissolution is different from the one
observed in saturated lime solution, in which the initial undersaturation and, thus, the driving
force for creating etch pits are low. As such, dissolution begins from close to the step-retreat
regime preserving the smoothness of the surface devoid of many etch pits (as shown in Figures
2.5b). Also, in the case of portlandite addition in alite hydration, Juilland et al. explained the
lengthening of the induction period due to the decrease in the initial undersaturation resulting
from rapid dissolution of portlandite. This leads to slower dissolution from the outset and
longer time needed to reach the critical level of portlandite supersaturation.
Figure 2.5: SEM images of alite immersed for (a) 2 minutes in DI-water (b) 2 minutes in
saturated lime solution. From [20].
Page Number: 28
Juilland et al.[20] summarized their study by presenting a schematic progression of dissolution
as a function of undersaturation outlining the two distinct regimes (shown in Figure 2.6).
They proposed that at the end of the induction period, massive precipitation of hydrates takes
place which consumes the ions from the pore-solution. Decrease in ionic-concentration, in
turn, causes the undersaturation to rise again placing the dissolution profile back in the
undersaturation-driven regime. Faster dissolution and a high undersaturation values provide a
driving force for the reaction rate to rise again during the acceleration regime.
These experimental observations provide very strong evidence to suggest that the hydration
kinetics during the first two stages is driven by solution controlled dissolution. The hypothesis
gets corroboration from experimental evidence and draws analogies from well-established
principles in Geo-chemistry. In this study, as will be demonstrated in the following chapters,
numerical evidence has been provided to substantiate this theory and it has been shown that
the same generic description of alite dissolution can be applied to a many alite-based systems
with different initial conditions.
Page Number: 29
2.4 Alite Hydration: Acceleration and Deceleration Periods
The acceleration period is the third stage of alite hydration occurring right after the end of
the induction period, in which massive precipitation of hydrates takes place and the rate of
reaction increases until a peak is reached. The post-peak regime of the alite hydration rate
profile is the deceleration period. The acceleration regime is generally attributed to nucleation
and growth (N&G) of hydrates [18,15,39], but there is no broad consensus on the mechanisms
driving the hydration kinetics during the deceleration regime.
Several authors have come up with different mechanisms to describe the decrease in the
reaction rate during the deceleration period. These mechanisms can be broadly divided into 3
main categories as summarized below and described in detail in the following sub-sections:
1. N&G of C-S-H with uniform density
2. Transition from N&G to diffusion based mechanism at the peak.
3. Nucleation and densifying growth (NDG) of C-S-H
Page Number: 30
As these assumptions can be broadly applied to the hydration of alite and formation of C-S-H
as the primary product, the Avrami equation can be derived as:
dX (2.3)
=An k n ( t−t0 )n-1 exp (−[k( t−t0 )n ])
dt
where, A is the normalization constant, t 0 is the time delay between the end of mixing and
start of nucleation and growth of C-S-H, k is the effective rate constant and n is a variable
represented by Equation 2.4.
p (2.4)
n= +q
s
where, p is the growth dimensionality (1 for needles, 2 for sheets and 3 for isotropic growth), s
is the type of rate control mechanism (1 for phase boundary and 2 for diffusion) and q is the
type of nucleation (0 for site saturation, in which the nucleation event occurs a t 0 and 1 for
continued nucleation of products). Depending on the values of p, s and q, the value of n can
range from 0.25 to 4.
Gt
X=1−exp [−2 O BV∫0 (1−exp (−Y e ))] (2.5)
where, G is the isotropic growth rate of the product and Y e is the extended area of the
transformed product phase given by Equation (2.6 and 2.7)
y
e
t− (if t > y/G) (2.6)
Y =π ∫0 G
IB (G 2 (t−τ)2−y 2)d τ
e
Y =0 (if t < y/G) (2.7)
Page Number: 31
where, y is the distance between the untransformed boundary and an imaginary plane, I B is
the density of nuclei, t is the time and τ is the time at which nucleation and growth of the
product begins.
2.4.1.3 Studies based on Avrami and Boundary N&G models using uniform
density of C-S-H
Using the Avrami equation, several authors [15,17,18,46] have attempted to fit alite hydration
profiles, either as the standard N&G mechanism or for the purpose of validation. The Dijon
model, developed by Garrault and Nonat [15,46] for the simulation of hydration of alite based
systems, is based on modified form of Avrami equation. The modification incorporates a non-
isotropic growth rate of the product. In their model, nuclei of C-S-H form on a two-
dimensional surface with periodic-boundary conditions and closed continuous surfaces. At
each step in the simulation, the nuclei grow both parallel and perpendicular to the surface.
The growth is simulated by generation of new C-S-H elements on the boundaries of per-
existing elements. It was observed that good fits with experimental results can be obtained if
the perpendicular growth rate is assumed to be higher than the parallel growth rate. One of
the critical drawbacks of this approach is that the effect of inter-particle interactions is not
taken into account and due to this, the fits can only be obtained with very large variations in
the simulations parameters. With large variations in the parameters, the deceleration regime
can be simulated but the parameters do not correlate well with the physical states of the
systems. Also, the model was calibrated and compared against experimental results with only
slightly different process parameters and was never validated for large variations in
experimental process parameters (such as PSD). The importance of validating mechanisms
against results from systems with very different specific surface areas is discussed below.
Thomas et al.[18] showed that the deceleration regimes of C 3S based systems could not be
reproduced using Avrami kinetics with a uniform density of C-S-H. In their study, the authors
showed that the boundary N&G mechanism using a uniform density of C-S-H could reproduce
the heat-evolution profiles, both in the acceleration and deceleration regimes. In a recent
study, Thomas et al.[43] also showed that the same set of equations could be used to simulate
hydration of C3S in the presence of accelerators, as shown in Figure (2.7). Here it should be
noted that in all simulations presented in [18,43] a parameter “A” was used, which effectively
scales the density of C-S-H to a value that allows the simulations to fit better with the
experimental results. However, like the Dijon model, this model was also not validated for
systems with large differences in process parameters.
Page Number: 32
Figure 2.7: Hydration of C3S in DI-water and in a CaCl2 solution simulated using the
boundary N&G model (from [43]).
The most serious drawbacks in simulating hydration using classical N&G mechanisms, both in
the Avrami and Boundary N&G forms, are highlighted when the specific surface area of
particle of alite changes drastically and the density scaling parameter “A” is not used. Bishnoi
and Scrivener[17] implemented simulations using the classical definition of boundary
nucleation and growth without the use of any scaling parameter in the microstructural model
μic [70] to reproduce hydration profiles of alite-based systems with specific surface areas
ranging from 600 to 3000 cm2/g. The calorimetry profiles for these systems were generated by
M. Costoya during her doctoral study at EPFL [44]. Bishnoi and Scrivener showed
numerically that using the classical definitions of nucleation and growth (both Avrami and
Boundary N&G) and assuming a uniform density of C-S-H, only the cumulative heat
evolution profiles of alite could be reproduced. The deceleration regime, which is accentuated
in the heat rate plot, could not be simulated well (shown in Figure 2.8). Bishnoi and Scrivener
argued that the discrepancy occurred due to the formation of a very low volume of uniformly
dense C-S-H at the time of the main heat-peak (shown in Figure 2.9) which was insufficient
for significant impingement between growing particles leading to a deceleration in the
hydration rate. Low volume of C-S-H at the peak was expected due to low degrees of
hydration at the peak, which was calculated between 6.5% to 14% for the systems with the
lowest and highest specific surface areas respectively. Bishnoi and Scrivener also showed that
the variation in the parameters, growth rate of the product in particular, was huge and did
Page Number: 33
not scale proportionally with the initial specific surface area of the different PSDs. The results
from the work of Bishnoi and Scrivener[17] showed that a N&G based model using a uniform
density of C-S-H cannot explain the post-peak deceleration.
Despite the problems mentioned above, classical N&G models are used prevalently to simulate
hydration of alite based systems. This is primarily because the computation power needed to
execute simulations is low.
Figure 2.8: Measured and numerical reproduction of heat evolution profiles of alite systems
with different PSDs. The names of the PSDs and the median particle diameters of each PSD
are indicated at the top left of each figure. The simulations were implemented using the
classical definition of the nucleation and growth. As can be seen, the mechanism provides
satisfactory fits to the cumulative evolution of the extent of reaction but fails to fit the heat
flow rates. The image was adapted from [17].
Page Number: 34
Figure 2.9: 2D slice for the simulation of alite hydration at the peak. The white rim and the
grey cores represent the product and unreacted alite respectively. The image was adapted
from [17].
To test this hypothesis, Bishnoi and Scrivener [17] implemented simulations for alite systems
with different PSDs using a mechanism that combined classical N&G and diffusion. The
acceleration part of the heat-flow rates were fit using the N&G mechanism and the
deceleration regime was reproduced using a diffusion based mechanism. In the simulations, the
authors observed that very good fits could be obtained for all systems (shown in Figure 2.10)
but the variation in the simulation parameters, especially the diffusion coefficient of C-S-H
used between different systems differed by over an order of magnitude.
This variation was in stark contradiction to the observations made for the same systems using
microscopy, where no characteristic or structural difference was found between the layers of
Page Number: 35
C-S-H. Peterson and Juenger [47] also reported a large variation in the diffusion coefficient of
C-S-H that was necessary to obtain fits for hydration profile of C 3S in solutions with
additives. In their study, the mechanisms was switched from boundary N&G to diffusion a
few hours after the peak. These studies, thus, strongly suggest that diffusion is not the driving
mechanism right after the peak, though it may become so later on.
Figure 2.10: Measured and numerical reproduction of heat evolution profiles of alite systems
with different PSDs. The names of the PSDs and the median particle diameters of each PSD
are indicated around the top left of each figure. The simulations were implemented using the
N&G mechanism for the acceleration part and diffusion through C-S-H for the deceleration
part. The simulations reproduce the evolution of hydration very well but the variation in the
diffusion coefficient is over an order of magnitude. The image was adapted from [17]
Page Number: 36
1. The surface of the particles is only partially covered by the product, and the
availability of product surface controls the growth of the product,
2. C-S-H grows uniformly over its exposed outer surface and
3. The rate of increase in packing fraction of C-S-H is assumed to decrease linearly with
the instantaneous density
Using this mechanism, the authors could obtain very good fits for the acceleration and
deceleration regimes of calorimetry profiles of alite systems with different PSDs (shown in
Figure 2.11). The authors also found that the growth rate of C-S-H (a simulation parameter)
required for the simulations was larger for systems with coarser particles and vice versa
suggesting an opportunistic growth in the presence of space in the microstructural matrix. It
should be noted that the inter-particle spacing is larger for systems with coarser particles and
vice versa and, consequently, the growth rate can also be related to the initial dispersion of
the particles. This variation will be further explored in this study in the upcoming chapters.
The variable density of C-S-H, which is an implicit assumption in the theory proposed by
Bishnoi et al., has also been previously suggested in other studies [48,49]. Powers in this study
proposed a progressive densification of the product [50]. The presence of a loose product can
also indirectly interpreted from results that emerge from NMR and QENS measurements,
which show the presence of excessive fraction of water close to the surface of hydrates [ 51,52].
A loose and low-density product growing as fibres or sheets can also be observed in many
micrographs [53,54], as shown in Figure (2.12).
The hypothesis of space availability driving the hydration of alite at later stages provides
good numerical reproduction of experimental data but remains controversial. In the current
study, this mechanism has been used to simulate the hydration of various alite based systems
and further evidence have been provided to confirm the theory. Several examples using this
theory are included in Chapter 4.
Page Number: 37
Figure 2.11: Measured and numerical reproduction of heat evolution profiles of alite systems
with different PSDs. The names of the PSDs and the median particle diameters of each PSD
are indicated around the top left of each figure. The simulations were implemented using the
diffuse growth criteria of C-S-H combined with boundary nucleation and growth mechanism.
The image was adapted from [17].
Page Number: 38
Figure 2.12: TEM image of OPC showing a relatively loosely-packed C–S–H. From[53]
Page Number: 39
2.6 Microstructural modeling of cement hydration kinetics
In the past decades lot of progress has been made towards the development of mathematical
models in the field of cement-based systems. The focus has primarily been on the analytical
models, which simulate hydration kinetics numerically without the use or generation of digital
microstructures. The Avrami and Boundary nucleation and growth based models described in
section (2.4) fall in this category.
A few microstructural models [17,56,57,58,59,65] have been developed in the past to simulate
hydration of cement-based systems. With the rise of the computation power, the capabilities
of models in this category have grown significantly. In the following sub-sections
microstructure based models will be described. The description includes the summaries of
capabilities of the model, their applications and the mechanisms used to describe the
hydration process. The assumptions made in the models are highlighted along with their
individual sets of strengths and limitations.
2.6.1 DuCOM
The model DuCOM was developed by Kondo and Ueda [56] to characterize the hydration of
alite using a single spherical particle and concentric layered growth of hydrates. For the
simulation of hydration kinetics, the authors [56] implemented a series of mechanisms to
describe hydration at different stages. For early ages, a metastable barrier is allowed to form
inhibiting dissolution of alite and leading to the induction period. The layer is then allowed to
disintegrate with time exposing the alite surface and leading to the acceleration period. The
alite particle then shrinks and a layer of hydration products grow as concentric layers into the
capillary pore-space. At the critical value of thickness of the outward product, the kinetics
shifts to diffusion-controlled mechanism as the overall rate decreases asymptotically. Using the
combination of these mechanisms, the results obtained from this model were reported to agree
well with the evolution of degree of hydration with time. However, several fit parameters were
used to obtain these results and the variations in the parameters were not shown to scale in
proportion to the physical parameters.
While DuCOM serves as a simple and effective tool to capture hydration kinetics of simple
systems, the representation of the hydration kinetics is not accurate as the inter-particle
interactions are not taken into account. Also, the influence of available space in the
microstructure on the hydration kinetics cannot be considered within the realms of this
approach. It has already been shown in section (2.5) that the available space in the
microstructure and sizes of the particles strongly influence the hydration rate.
Page Number: 40
2.6.2 The Jennings+Johnson model
The model developed by Jennings and Johnson [57] was the first microstructure based model
developed to simulate hydration of cement based systems. The model was based on vector
approach using spheres to represent cement particles. To simulate the hydration process, the
spheres, representing reactant particles, were allowed to shrink and concentric layers of
products grew on the anhydrous particles. The overlaps between particles were accounted for
by redistribution of products in the capillary-space. Algorithms were implemented to simulate
the mechanical aspects of cement hydration by taking into account the effects of PSDs and
w/c ratios. Aspects related to pore-solution chemistry, nucleation of C-S-H and solid and pore
phase connectivities were proposed but not implemented in the final version. Due to
limitation in the computation power at the time of the development of the model, the
simulations represented the hydration of cement roughly at best. While the use of this model
was limited and lasted only for a short period, it paved the way for development of more
sophisticated models.
Page Number: 41
Figure 2.13: Schematic representation of growth of products in HymoStruc model [58].
Page Number: 42
CemHyD3D model has been widely used over the years by several researchers to simulate the
development of a realistic microstructures. However, the model lacks the description of
intrinsic kinetics. In order to compensate for this, a large set of empirical rules are used, which
in turn present a number of inherent limitations. One serious drawback of the model is the
lack of a physical time scale parameter. For every cement mix, the time scale needs to be
calibrated with respect to the experimental data that provides a measure of the extent of
hydration with respect to time (generally in hours). This empirical dependency of the
computation time parameter on the physical time parameter renders the presence of
experimental results as a prerequisite. Hence, the model fails to serve as a predictive tool that
would replace experiments.
The time of precipitation of products, AFt and AFm phases in particular, in the model is also
calibrated based on observations from experimental data and, hence, do not necessarily follow
the rules of thermodynamics. Due to this limitation for each new cement mix with a different
composition, the stability of product phases either do not cohere with the experimental
observations or invoke the need of a fresh calibration.
The more serious drawback, perhaps, of the CemHyD3D model is its inherent lattice
resolution limit, which is typically 1 μm, on account of limited computational power available
at the time of development. Consequently, the simulations do not represent particles or
species which are less than 1 μm in size. In reality as several features in the cement
microstructure (gel pores, some capillary pores, several small anhydrous cement particles,
small nuclei of products) are much less than a micron in size.
When conceived CemHyD3D was an important development and its use points towards the
need for a new microstructural model that can make proper use of the currently available
computational power.
Page Number: 43
2.6.5 HydratiCA simulation model
HydratiCA simulation model is in development by Bullard [65] at NIST. Compared to
CemHyD3D, which was also developed at NIST, HydratiCA is based on more fundamental
principles of kinetics of the individual rate processes comprising cement hydration. The model
draws its basic principles from CemHyD3D and simulates hydration using a series of
mechanisms: (a) diffusion of mobile species in the solution (b) dissolution and growth of
mineral phases (c) complexation reactions among species in solution or at solid-solution
interfaces (d) nucleation of new phases. Mass and concentration balances are used to define
rules for the interactions and the overall hydration profiles are simulated using a 3D
microstructure based approach.
The reactions in the model are simulated using probabilistic rules that define changes in the
chemistry and structure in small time increments. The reaction progresses with dissolution of
solid phases followed by diffusion of ionic species. Inter-species interactions, both chemical and
eletrostatic in nature, are accounted for as hydration progresses. The input parameters: molar
volumes of phases, diffusive mobility of species, reaction rate constants, equilibrium constants,
activation energies, solubility products of solid phases and enthalpies of formation of different
products – provide necessary definition of the state of the systems and criteria for the
evolution of the microstructure and formation of new products. The differences in the initial
state of the systems reflects in the simulations and results in different evolutions of the
microstructure despite having the same built-in mechanisms. Unlike its predecessor
CemHyD3D, HydratiCA does not require calibrations for new mixes as all calculations are
based on laws of thermodynamics and values from literature, which are given as input.
However, many of the input parameters are not available in the literature or accessible
experimentally so a large lumber of parameters must be fit. For example, the equilibrium rate
constant for the formation of C-S-H (both forward and backward reactions) is required for the
simulation of C3S hydration. As a precise value of this parameters has not been
experimentally determined, the user is required to provide the best estimated value. This can
be critical because it affects the results of the simulation directly.
Page Number: 44
HydratiCA has been used to investigate the plausibility of various possible mechanisms of
hydration of C3S [19] and multi-phase systems[66]. While it has been shown that the model
has the potential to be used to investigate mechanisms driving hydration and validate
hypotheses, the computation power needed to run the simulations presents the biggest hurdle.
The simulations for larger systems require multiple processors for spatial decomposition of the
computational domains. Furthermore, the time required for the simulations is also very large.
For example, simulating the dissolution of C3S (pure) in DI-water for 2 hours requires about 2
weeks of simulation time on a supercomputer that utilizes multiple processors. In smaller
computational systems, the same simulation would require several months to converge. This
limits the applicability of the model. Also, as the simulation times of the model are large, the
choice of input parameters becomes even more critical as re-running the simulations multiple
times to establish precise input values is excessively time-consuming.
While HydratiCA should offer a lot of advantages over several existing models, the
computational requirements make it a tool that is exclusive to the users who have access to
powerful computational systems. Large simulation times that are required by the model make
it infeasible for simulations of systems that are large or for simulations of hydration at later
ages.
The mechanisms that are included in the model are Avrami nucleation and growth, Phase-
boundary growth and diffusion. The Avrami equation is used for the initial nucleation and
growth regime of the reaction. In the second stage, boundary growth is used, where the rate of
reaction depends on the uncovered surface area of the individual reactant particles. In the
third phase, the rate of reaction is diffusion controlled, where the rate of consumption of the
reactant material is inversely proportional to the thickness of the hydrates deposited on the
surface of reactant particles. The hydration kinetics are simulated at the scale of individual
particles taking into account the effects of impingements, evolution of the exposed surface
area and porosity in the vicinity of the particles. This is a more accurate representation of the
microstructure as compared to other vector-approach based microstructural models like
HymoStruc[58].
Page Number: 45
Using the model, the authors simulated hydration of cement-based systems and obtained good
fits [67]. Simulations were also implemented to post-process the digital microstructure and
characterize pore-sizes and connectivity[69]. However, the model was limited because of the
lack of data-structure algorithms to reduce the computational complexity. As the model
treated hydration at the scale of individual particles, the simulations were computationally
expensive and simulations were limited to ten thousand particles. This was a serious drawback
because a sample of real cement contains millions of particles.
Due to these limitations, IPKM was not extensively used. However it paved the way for the
development of the modeling platform μic, which draws it basic principles and
implementations from IPKM.
The model was developed with a view to provide flexibility to the users on account of our
gaps in understanding of the driving mechanisms. As such, the core of model works as a
stand-alone platform that only simulates reactions and generates “resolution-free”
microstructure. “Plugins” are used to describe customized mechanisms and rules in the form of
simple mathematical equations that drive the hydration kinetics, simulate the consumption of
the anhydrous particles and the formation of new products. Different sets of plugins can be
used to describe several variations in the microstructure such as the following:
1. Initial state of system including w/c ratio, PSD, phase-assemblage of the clinker
particles (polyphase systems with a single PSD or collection of monophase systems
with two or more PSDs), addition/substitution by filler particles etc. can be defined by
the user.
2. The spatial arrangement of the phases in the microstructural volume can be
Page Number: 46
customized. Products can be defined to nucleate as layers on particles or as separate
nuclei in the capillary-pore space or both. Products can also be defined as interspersed
with other products or as a separate phase. This is demonstrated in Figure (2.14).
3. The reactions, reactants, products, and the growth criteria of products can be described
as per the users input. For example: growth of C-S-H can be described as concentric
layers or as fibres. Products can be allowed to grow as fractals, fibers etc.. This is
shown in Figure (2.15).
4. Plugins can be written to describe rules for precipitation of products based on user-
defined thermodynamic rules or manual triggers. The triggers can also be defined to be
based on slower or faster reaction rates. For example, diffusion can be set to begin at
the peak or when the rate of diffusion becomes lower than the rate from classical N&G
based mechanism for products.
5. As finite-difference scheme is built into the core of the model, equations can be
described to evaluate the progression of hydration in customized time-steps, both fine
or coarse. Hydration at very late ages can also be simulated.
6. Plugins can be written to describe hydration as N&G based, diffusion based or other
custom mechanisms or combination of different mechanisms occurring in customized
time domains.
7. Plugins can also be coded to customize the outputs. Numerical outputs can be
generated in the desired units and in file-formats as per the users' need. The
microstructural outputs can also customized to generate a wide range of information as
needed by the user.
Page Number: 47
Figure 2.14: Customized distribution of phases in the μic microstructure. (from [70])
Figure 2.15: Simulation of products (a) as smooth layers and new nuclei in the capillary-pore
space (b) as controlled nucleation of small discrete nuclei on the surface of reactant particle.
(from [22])
Page Number: 48
Using the customized plugins, μic is well suited to investigate various phenomena at the
microstructure level, such as the effect of PSDs, w/c ratio and filler addition. As hydration
progresses and the microstructure evolves, the effect of impingements is taken into account
and is reflected in the spatial distribution of the products (products are not allowed to
nucleate or grow in space that is already occupied). The output of the model includes: 3D
microstructural images, phase volume and mass fractions, heat output and details involving
each reaction. The microstructural images are generated using resolution-free information that
includes the radii and coordinates of each particle that can be utilized to simulate the
evolution of properties such as: porosity, pore-size distribution, permeability, strength etc.
The model μic has been used to describe the hydration of alite studying the effect of particle
sizes[17]. The model was used to test and validate the applicability of several N&G based
equations, as described in the previous sections. Using the flexibility of the model, plugins
were used to describe the hydration of alite using a diffuse growth criteria of C-S-H, which
reproduced the heat evolution profiles of several alite based systems very well, as described in
section 2.4.3. The speed and flexibility of μic allows the simulation of complex systems with
realistic particle sizes and specific mechanisms. The model offers a range of output results that
can be used to test and validate mechanisms and also to post-process and analyze the
mirostructure to derive the development of other properties. In this study, the modeling
platform μic is used to simulate hydration of several alite-based systems.
This study sets out to integrate in the model thermodynamics and solution-phase chemistry,
which determine the rules for dissolution and precipitation of phases. The one other limitation
of the model is the spherical approximation of the particles, which affects the pore structure
and, consequently, the connectivity of the pore-network. Another limitation of the model is a
large number of customizable elements, which on one hand offers flexibility to the users and
on the other hand presents a certain degree of complexity.
Page Number: 49
2.7 Current Study
The current study is based on μic that simulates hydration of cement-based systems.
For the simulation of the early age mechanisms, dissolution of phases is implemented using
our latest understanding from the field of Geo-chemistry and following the theories of solution
controlled dissolution as proposed by Juilland et al.[20]. Thermodynamic laws are
incorporated in the core of model to provide a generic description of the hydration
mechanisms and dissolution/precipitation of phases. The dissolution parameters are calibrated
such that they can be generically used to describe the hydration of alite in different initial
conditions without the need for re-calibration or re-derivation of the simulation parameters.
The calibrations are done using different sets of experiment results from a wide range of
systems to ensure that the final values generically describe the physical meanings they stand
for. The output of the simulations are extended to include solution-phase chemistry to provide
more flexibility to the users for validation against a variety of experimental results.
For the description of hydration during stages III and IV, simulations are implemented using
a modified form of boundary nucleation and growth incorporating the change in the density of
products. The mechanism has been adapted from the study of Bishnoi et al.[17]. The
simulations are implemented and validated against experimental results for several types of
systems to illustrate the ability of the model to generically describe hydration.
While several mechanisms have been incorporated in the model, several algorithms have been
implemented in parallel to reduce the level of computational complexity. The time-step for
simulations is kept small so as to capture the evolution of the microstructure at small time
intervals. At the same time, special care is taken to ensure that the overall simulation time
does not exceed a few hours.
Page Number: 50
Chapter 3: Simulation Techniques for Alite Hydration
This chapter describes the simulation techniques implemented in the model to describe the
hydration of alite. The model has been developed to describe mechanisms at both early and
late ages of hydration. The following sections describe the mechanisms and techniques
employed and their mathematical descriptions in the model. The assumptions and
approximations made as part of the description of the mechanisms are also outlined.
3.1 Introduction
In Chapter 2, several proposed mechanisms pertaining to hydration of alite were delineated.
In this section, concepts which are of specific relevance to development of the model are
described. The heat evolution profile is alite is the primary experiment result that captures
the effects of several process parameters, describes kinetics and is used for comparison against
simulation results. Figure (3.1) shows a typical heat evolution curve for the first 50 hours.
Five main stages can be identified:
1. Dissolution period: During the first minutes, alite dissolves and ions are released into
the pore solution, but the reaction rapidly slows to a low rate.
2. Induction period: During the following hours low activity and low heat evolution are
observed.
3. Acceleration period: The rate of heat evolution increases for several hours until it
reaches a peak
4. Deceleration period: The rate of heat evolution decreases for a few hours
5. Slow hydration period: After the deceleration period, the hydration rate continues
at a low decreasing level.
Page Number: 51
Figure 3.1: Typical heat evolution curve of alite-model systems until approximately 2 days of
hydration.
The mechanisms governing these periods have recently been reviewed by Bullard et al. [71].
Most controversy surrounds the first two periods. The two principal theories are that the
slowdown in the rate of reaction occurs either: due to formation of a metastable barrier
product on the surface of the reacting alite grains; or due to a decreasing rate of alite
dissolution caused by the build-up in concentration of ions in solutions. Arguments for and
against these hypothesis are fully discussed in [71].
In a recent publication [72] the similarities were demonstrated between alite reaction and the
dissolution of many other minerals studied in geochemistry, where the theory of a slow
dissolution step due to the buildup of ions in solution is widely accepted. The dissolution rate
of most natural minerals does not follow a smooth relationship with respect to the saturation
state of the solution [73,74]. Far from equilibrium, high rates of dissolution are enabled by
etch pit opening. Whereas at high concentrations, the transition to the slow dissolution regime
occurs at the levels of undersaturation still several orders of magnitude more dilute than the
equilibrium concentration. In this regime, the driving force from undersaturation is insufficient
to activate the etch pit opening and dissolution occurs by a retreating step mechanism that is
much slower. We refer hereafter to this mechanism as solution controlled dissolution – SCD.
Page Number: 52
As described in Chapter 2, periods 3 and 4 are now generally accepted to be controlled by the
nucleation and growth of the main hydrate phase C-S-H. The kinetics in this period have been
successfully reproduced by an analytical Boundary Nucleation and Growth algorithm [75] and
numerically in the μic modelling platform [76]. In the later case it was found that period 4 was
only well captured across a range of particle sizes, when C-S-H was presumed to grow out
rapidly with a low packing density until the products growing from adjacent grains impinged.
Concurrently this diffuse product densifies as a function of its distance from the underlying
grain. This mechanism is subsequently referred to as nucleation and densifying growth –
NDG.
Page Number: 53
3.2 Basics of µic
The modeling platform µic [78] is used in this study, a detailed description of which can be
found in Chapter 2. This is a microstructural modeling framework, which uses a vector
approach to generate a resolution free microstructure. That is to say particles are represented
geometrically as spheres with their respective positions and radii stored as vectors. Reactions
and mechanisms are implemented as “plugins”, which are user definable. Reactions,
consumption of reactants and formation of products are carried out whilst monitoring the
volumetric quantities of each phase. The model is flexible and can be used to study the effects
of various processes and mechanisms in hydration of cement-based systems.
Particle size distribution plays an important role in determining the rate of reaction
[74,85,86]. Finer particles with higher specific surface area react rapidly compared to cement
with coarser particles having low specific surface area. In order to capture the effect of particle
size distribution it is crucial to have a representation of the real particle size gradation in the
model.
Initially, in the simulations, alite particles are randomly dispersed in the microstructure
without any overlaps. Spheres are used to represent the alite particles using the real PSD as
obtained from laser granulometry. Product phases which form as a result of hydration and
their arrangement in the microstructure are also defined by the user. As the microstructure
evolves with the growth of products, the effects of impingements between hydration products
and clinker phases are taken into account to evaluate the overall rate of reaction.
In all the simulations presented in this and the following chapters, the arrangement of
hydrates is as shown in Figure (3.2). Inner product C-S-H forms in the space left by the
dissolving alite grains was assumed to have a uniform density of 2.10 g/cm 31. The density
values used for alite, water and portlandite are 3.15 g/cm 3, 1.0 g/ml and 2.24 g/cm3
respectively. Outer C-S-H forms as a layer initially with low packing density. This packing
density increases over time from a low value to 2.10 g/cm 3, as described below and in [78]. It
should be noted that the change in density of the outer C-S-H only indicates its packing
density. As such, the H20/Si and Ca/Si ratios of outer C-S-H are the same as for inner C-S-H.
Portlandite nucleates in the original water filled space. This arrangement of hydrates in the
1 We are aware of the extensive debate about the density of C-S-H, which depends on the water content. We
consider the value of 2.1 for inner or “high density” C-S-H to be reasonable for a composition of C 1.7SH4 as
expected in standard systems. However changes in this value will only have a minor impact on the rest of
the paper.
Page Number: 54
microstructure follows the widely accepted view of microstructural development from
microscopical observations [87,88,89,90].
As alite dissolves and hydrates, C-S-H (inner and outer products) and portlandite (CH) are
formed according to volumes given in Equation 3.1, where the H/S ratio assumed for C-S-H is
4.0.
The heat released under isothermal conditions is computed by using the standard enthalpy of
reactions [89,90], as given in Table 1. At each step, the amount of each hydrated alite is
calculated and used to compute the heat that would be released under isothermal conditions
at T = 293.15 K. The cumulative heat released is then computed by the addition of heat
released in individual steps. The rate of heat evolution is computed by differentiating the rate
of cumulative heat released with time.
Figure 3.2: Distribution of phases in different cementitious systems as used in the model.
Page Number: 55
Up until the precipitation of portlandite (stages 1 and 2, Figure 3.1), the rate controlling
mechanism is the solution controlled dissolution (SCD) of alite. The rate of dissolution is
determined by the solution concentration following the hypothesis advances by Juilland et al.
[2], as described below. Subsequently the main heat evolution profile is simulated by
nucleation and densifying growth (NDG), this fit to the main heat evolution peak and so
there is a virtual starting point for the NDG regime at t0, as will be described later.
As described earlier, the simulations are implemented with two different kinetic mechanisms:
SCD and NDG. The heat evolution during the SCD phase is computed using the set of
Equations (3.2 – 3.5). It should be noted that negative sign indicates decrease in the mass of
alite as dissolution progresses.
where, Q, H and m are the heat flow rate, enthalpy and mass respectively.
Likewise, the heat evolution during the NDG regime is calculated using Equation 3.5.
dm alite (3.5)
Q2=− ⋅Halite hydration
dt
Page Number: 56
3.3 Solution controlled dissolution (SCD)
The dissolution of alite plays a key role in the evolution of the concentration of ions in the
pore solution. It has been shown by Bullard et al. [91] that the concentration in solution
become uniform throughout the overall volume very fast. Furthermore, any concentration
gradients only exist on the scale of the distances between particles, which are very small (a
few μm). Therefore, in the model the solution concentrations are considered to be uniform
throughout the simulation volume.
The dissolution of alite is described by Equation (3.6). In this study “[]” and “{}” represent
concentrations and activities respectively. It should be noted that the ionic species used in
Equation (3.6) are “elemental” and their respective speciations will depend on the overall pH
of the pore-solution.
C3S + 3H2O ----- > 3Ca2+(aq) + 4OH-(aq) + H2SiO42-(aq) (3.6)
Juilland et al. [72] proposed that the rate of dissolution of alite varies as a function of the
undersaturation of alite. At high degrees of undersaturation, i.e. on, and shortly after the
addition of water, the dissolution is rapid, with the creation of etch pits. As ions enter
solution, the undersaturation of the solution decreases until a critical degree of
undersaturation is reached, where there is no longer enough energy to generate etch pits and
the rate of dissolution slows down dramatically. Beyond this point dissolution is slow
corresponding to dissolution by step retreat from existing etch pits. The dependence of
dissolution rate on undersaturation close to this transition is controversial as some claim it is
almost a step change [92], but here we assume that the rate of dissolution varies linearly with
the parameter βalite, which is the ion activity product of the ions in solution divided by the
equilibrium solubility products (Equation 3.7), as this fits best with data report in the
literature [24,25,26]. While βalite represents the degree of undersaturation, log β alite is the
Saturation Index (SIalite).
IAPalite ( t)
β alite ( t )= (3.7)
K sp alite
where, IAP alite ( t)={Ca 2+ }3.0⋅{ H2 SiO42- }⋅{ OH - }4.0 is the ion activity product for alite and,
K spalite (t )=1.14⋅10 is the equilibrium solubility product for alite.
−4
The value for the solubility product of alite is a matter of discussion; here we use the value
given by Bellmann et al. [93]. This value was selected (as opposed to other values, i.e., Stein
Page Number: 57
et al. [94]) as this series of calculations assumes H 2SiO42- as the primary charged silicate
species in solution. It should be noted that the value of both Ion Activity Product and
Solubility product of alite will change depending on the choice of primary charged silicate
species.
Overall the rate of dissolution of alite (µmol. m-2. s-1) is described mathematically by Equation
(3.8). This equation was modified from the form as originally described by Damidot et al. [95]
in the light of hypotheses advanced by Juilland et al. [72], a brief description of which is
provided above. It describes the dissolution regimes of fast dissolution facilitated by etch pit
formation for undersaturation below the critical value of β max (for βalite <= βmax given by
Equation 3.8a) and slow dissolution driven by step retreats beyond the critical
undersaturation (for βalite > βmax given by Equation 3.8b). The negative sign in the equations
indicates loss in the mass of alite as a function of time as dissolution progresses.
−dm alite ( t)
=( −k diss⋅aSSA⋅( β max−βalite ( t)) ) −a SSA⋅c step retreat (3.8a)
dt
dm alite (t )
=−aSSA⋅cstep retreat (3.8b)
dt
where, dm (mol. m-2) is the amount of alite dissolved, βmax is the critical degree of
undersaturation of alite, kdiss (mol. kg. m-4. s-1) is a dissolution rate constant, a SSA (m2. kg-1) is
the specific surface area of particles divided by the volume fraction of the water in the
representative volume (to take in account the w/c ratio), and c step retreat (mol. kg. m-4. s-1) is the
step retreat constant. In the simulations, βalite(t) is calculated at each step based on the
amount of alite dissolved and taking into account the total volume of water present in the
representative volume. As such, the rate of dissolution of alite varies as a linear function of
undersaturation (β) when the undersaturation is high. When the undersaturation approaches
Page Number: 58
a critical undersaturation value, given by β max, dissolution continues at a constant value driven
by step retreats (given by aSSA. cstep ). The equation consists of three parameters which
retreat
With the dissolution equation implemented in the present form, the effects of surface area of
alite particles and differences in the initial states of the mixing solution can be described
without the need for any modification in the format of the equation. The description of the
effects of these process parameters is further discussed in the upcoming sections and chapters.
I=0.5 ∑ m i⋅zi
2
(3.10)
where γi is the activity coefficient, zi is the unit charge and m i (moles. Kg-1) is the molality of
the species i. For the calculations of the activity coefficients, Truesdell-Jones form of [96]
extended Debye-Hückel equation shown by Equation (3.11) was used. This equation is
applicable for electrolytes having an ionic strength up to 2.0 mol/L, which is accepted as a
good upper-bound for cement-based systems.
−A T z2i √ I
log γi= +b i⋅I (3.11)
1+BT a i √ I
where,
2 Molality (mi) = moles of species i( in moles) / Mass of water (in Kg). Water is assumed to have a density of
1 g/ml here.
Page Number: 59
B T=( 1 .62⋅10−4 ) T+ ( 0 .2799 ) (3.12b)
T (K) is the temperature, I (moles. Kg -1) is the ionic strength and, a i (Å) and bi (Å) are
Kielland ion-specific parameters.
Values of AT and BT were calculated by using a temperature value of 293.15 K in
Equations(3.12a - 3.12b). The values of ai and bi for different ionic species used in the
simulations are shown in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2: Ion specific parameters for ionic species. All values have been adapted from [26]
The expression of Saturation Index (SI) for any phase in solution is given by Equation (3.13)
IAP
SI=log
( )
K sp
(3.13)
where IAP is the ion activity product and Ksp is the solubility product. A negative value of SI
implies undersaturation, a positive value indicates supersaturation and SI = 0 implies
equilibrium with respect to the pore solution. A product is expected to precipitate when it is
supersaturated with respect to the pore solution.
3 For H2SiO42-, Davies form of equation was used. The ion-specific parameters were modified to incorporate the
effect of temperature.
Page Number: 60
Figure 3.3: Flow-chart depicting the steps followed for simulation of the SCD regime in the
model.
Page Number: 61
IAPCSH−Rothstein ={Ca 2 + }1.7⋅{ H2 SiO42- }⋅{ OH - }1.4 (3.14a)
2+ (1.75−y / 2 ) + y /2 2- - (1.5−y / 2 )
IAP CSH−Glasser ={Ca } ⋅{CaOH } ⋅{ H 2 SiO4 }⋅{OH } (3.14b)
Ca Ca
(3.15)
( −y /2 ) (2 −y /2−2 )
2+ + y/2 2- -
IAPCSH ={Ca } Si
⋅{CaOH } ⋅{ H2 SiO4 }⋅{ OH } Si
To calculate the activity of the CaOH+ species, the law of mass-action was used (Equation
3.16, [99,100]). Using this equation, the concentration of CaOH+ can be computed using the
set of equations described by Equation 3.16-3.18, where γCa2+ and γCaOH+ are the activity
coefficients of CaOH+ and Ca2+ (using the simulated Ionic Strength) respectively.
2+ + + -12.78
Ca +H2 O=CaOH +H where , log k=10 (3.16)
Page Number: 62
Figure 3.4: Ratio of activities of CaOH+ and Ca2+ as a function of pH.
The calculation of the saturation index of C-S-H also requires knowledge of its solubility
product. Various values are reported in the literature corresponding to CaO-SiO 2-H20 systems
with specific Ca/Si ratios. Values as a function of Ca/Si ratio can be obtained by
consideration of the CaO-SiO2 solubility curve published and adapted by several authors
[94,76] (Figure 3.5) and the widely published relationship [89,101,102,103,104,105] between the
Ca/Si ratio of C-S-H as a function of Ca2+ (Figure 3.6). Mathematical fits to these two sets of
data, shown in the respective figures, were used to obtain the solubility product of C-S-H as a
function of Ca/Si, as shown in Figure (3.7). The solubility product values reported for Jennite
(Ksp = 10-11.85) [88] and Tobermorite (Ksp = 10-8.0) [106] correspond to Ca/Si ratios of 1.5 and
0.833 respectively are also shown in Figure (3.7). This plot indicates that C-S-H is somewhat
more soluble than these reference phases as expected for a disordered phase. The line of
congruent dissolution of alite (Ca:Si = 3:1) is also shown in Figure (3.5) and from the point of
intersection of this congruent dissolution line and the CaO-SiO 2 solubility line, the Ca/Si ratio
of the first product formed can be calculated, which is also indicated on Figures (3.6 and 3.7).
However, this first C-S-H is predicted to have a low Ca/Si ratio, which would require silicate
chain length more than the dimeric species typically seen at such early stages of hydration
[107]. In any case the Ca/Si ratio of the C-S-H quickly evolves to around 1.7 in around 20
minutes, so small differences between predicted and actual composition will not significantly
affect the simulations. The saturation index of C-S-H was calculated at each step from these
data. Precipitation was assumed to occur at the first step where SI C-S-H exceeds 0.
Page Number: 63
Subsequently calcium and silicate ions were removed from the solution to keep SI C-S-H
= 0.
The Ca/Si ratio of the product at each step was calculated according to the instantaneous
calcium concentration. At the point of C-S-H precipitation, the Ca/Si was calculated as 0.84.
It should be noted here, that in the simulations it was approximated that all of Si
concentration in the pore solution are considered as H 2SiO42-. We are aware that the
speciation of silica differs from this, including H 2SiO42-, H3SiO4- and H4SiO40, but at present
this can only be calculated iteratively using a system of linear equations and so has not yet
been implemented in the computation for reasons of speed.
Figure 3.5: Solubility curve for C-S-H taken from data of Brown et al. [76]. The dotted line
shows the calibration of the SiO2-CaO solubility data as implemented in the model. The solid
line shows the path of solution concentration for congruent dissolution of alite which will
intersect the curve at the point indicated by the arrow. From this point and Figure (3.5) by
using the equivalent total Ca concentration, the composition of the first C-S-H to precipitate
can be calculated.
Page Number: 64
Figure 3.6: Evolution of Ca/Si ratio as a function of Ca 2+ concentration. The calibration of
Ca/Si ratio was done using data points (shown as solid symbols) extracted from several
authors [89,93,92,91]. The point at which first product forms is also indicated.
Page Number: 65
Figure 3.7: Simulated plot of log (K sp-C-S-H) as a function of Ca/Si ratio. The data points
correspond to tobermorite and jennite [88,87]. The point at which first product forms is also
indicated.
Page Number: 66
IAPPortlandite
SIPortlandite =log
( K s p Portlandite ) (3.19)
where,
These parameters were calibrated iteratively by trying to match the first part of the heat
evolution (up to the end of the induction period) from the simulations to the experimental
data from isothermal calorimetry. Figure (3.8a) shows the sensitivity of the output
simulation curves during the first few hours to the values of these coefficients. All three
values must be defined independently to obtain the correct shape of the experimental heat
evolution curves. The value of kdiss influences mainly the steepness of the slowdown in
dissolution rate, while the parameter cstep retreat affects the minimum heat evolution during the
induction period. The value of βmax changes the point of transition from the undersaturation to
the step-retreat regime and, consequently, the time spent in the step-retreat regime. At higher
values of βmax, the dissolution kinetics stay in the fast dissolution regime longer and, hence, a
shorter time in the step retreat regime is required to reach portlandite supersaturation. The
reverse happens when the value of β max is lower, as shown in Figure (3.8d). The values of all
three dissolution parameters affect the time at which portlandite precipitates. These best
values obtained are shown in Table 3.3 are kept constant in all subsequent simulations.
Page Number: 67
Table 3.3: Calibrated values of dissolution parameters at the temperature of 293.15 K
The best value of βmax was found to be 10-22.0. As discussed by Julliand et al.[72] it is seen that
the onset of slow dissolution takes place when IAP alite is still many orders of magnitude away
from the hypothetical equilibrium solubility for alite 4 between 3 and 1.14 x 10-4 [86,82]. This is
depicted in Figure (3.9), which shows log (IAP alite/Ksp-alite)5 with respect to time. Once
portlandite precipitates (when SIPortlandite reaches a value of 0.40), the concentrations of calcium
and hydroxyl ions decrease causing a corresponding decrease in log (IAP alite/Ksp-alite) back to
the high dissolution regime. Therefore one reason for the acceleration period is due to the
transition of the dissolution kinetics back to the high dissolution regime.
The relationship between the dissolution rate and the undersaturation of alite (log(βalite))is
shown in Figure (3.10). The dissolution profile of alite comprises of two regimes:
Undersaturation below βmax in which the rate varies linearly with the difference (βmax - βalite(t))
or logarithmically with the Saturation Index; and undersaturation above βmax corresponding to
the step retreat regime, where rate of dissolution is constant equal to (aSSA.cstep retreat). As can be
seen, after the precipitation of portlandite the rate of dissolution increases in magnitude and
transitions back to the high dissolution regime. The form of this curve is the same as that
proposed by Juilland (Fig 20 in [72])6. The solid symbols on this curve are the experimental
data points from Damidot [77]. It is interesting to note the excellent agreement between the
values obtained from this study of alite synthesized by Costoya and the value from a totally
independent alite (or C3S) synthesis by Damidot.
4 NB it is not possible to precisely measure the equilibrium solubility for alite, due to the precipitation of the
hydrate phases. Values between 3 and 10-4 are reported.
5 log(IAPalite/Ksp-alite) = log(βalite)
6 The values for alite undersaturation in the original paper were not calculated. The values are simple
projections which represent the decrease in undersaturation from high values to very low values as dissolution
progresses.
Page Number: 68
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 3.8: Sensitivity of the dissolution parameters as indicated at the top of each figure. In
all simulations w/c = 0.4 and a SSA = 2000 cm2/g (Alite C2). The values were calibrated (see
Table 3.3) so as to provide the best fit with the measured heat evolution profile during the
dissolution and induction periods. As can be seen, values lower or higher than the calibrated
values show deviation from the measured profile.
Figure 3.8(d): Evolution of CaTotal concentration as the value of βmax deviates from the
calibrated value of 10-22.0.
Page Number: 69
Figure 3.9: Simulation evolution of log (IAPalite/Ksp-alite) as a function of time. The black
dotted line represents the critical undersaturation value (log (βmax). The specific surface area
and w/c ratio are indicated at the top of the figure. Once Portlandite precipitates at the
point indicated by the circle symbol, log (IAPalite/Ksp-alite) decreases again (shown
schematically by the arrow) to the high dissolution regime until portlandite saturation
equilibrium is reached. The value of log (IAP alite/Ksp-alite) at the point of portlandite solubility
equilibrium (indicated by the grey dotted line) was calculated as -22.17.
Page Number: 70
Figure 3.10: Dissolution profiles versus undersaturation for alite (as obtained from
simulations for w/c = 0.5 and aSSA = 4265 cm2/g). The round symbols represent measured
values from [25]. The point of portlandite precipitation exists at the right extrema of the
plot, which also marks the end of the simulated SCD regime. As portlandite precipitates,
ions are consumed and the dissolution kinetics transition back to the undersaturation regime.
The decrease is shown schematically by the arrow and the point of portlandite solubility
equilibrium (calculated as log (IAPalite/Ksp-alite) equal to -22.17) is indicated by the circle.
Page Number: 71
3.8 Evolution of calcium and silicate concentrations and C-S-H during SCD
regime
The evolution of the solutions during the SCD regime was examined. Brown [76] provides the
most detailed experimental solution data at a w/c ratio close to those used practically in
pastes (w/c=0.7). Figure (3.11) shows the simulated evolution of total Si, total Ca and Ca2+
concentration with time compared to experimental data reported by Brown[76].
(a) (b)
Figure 3.11: Evolution of concentration (a) Total Calcium and Ca 2+ (b) Total Si . In the
model it is assumed that all of Si concentration exists as H 2SiO42-. Once portlandite
precipitates, CaTotal and Ca2+ decrease and SiTotal increases until portlandite solubility
equilibrium is reached (shown by arrows). The levels of Ca 2+, CaTotal and SiTotal at portlandite
solubility equilibrium are indicated by dotted lines. The data points have been extracted from
[76].
Figures (3.12) shows, the evolution of the Ca/Si ratio of the C-S-H and the total amount of
C-S-H formed up to the end of the induction period. It should also be noted that the rate of
dissolution of alite is assumed to be unmitigated by the physical precipitation of C-S-H during
the early ages. As such, the change in the surface area of particles is also not taken into
account in the model during the SCD regime. This, however, has little or no impact on alite
dissolution because the amount of C-S-H formed until the end of induction period (shown in
Page Number: 72
Figure 3.12b) is very small. This amount of C-S-H is also not critical if spread thinly on the
surface of alite.
(a) (b)
Figure 3.12: Simulated time dependent evolution of (a) amount of C-S-H until the end of the
induction period (b) Ca/Si ratio of C-S-H
V real=1−e
−V extended
(3.21a)
Page Number: 73
or,
Vs , t−V s , t=0
V real (t)= (3.21b)
1−Vs , t =0
These equations hold for systems with multiple products and takes into account the volume
occupied by other products such as portlandite. For these systems, it can be assumed that the
probability, and therefore the fraction of the extended volume lost to overlaps, increases as
the real volume available for growth reduces, as shown in Equation (3.22).
dVreal dVextended (3.22)
= (1−Vreal )
dt dt
If a densifying growth of C-S-H is assumed, the mass of alite reacting in a period δt can be
written as:
ρ(t r+dt r)−ρ( tr )
−dmalite =
1 ρ(t)
k ρ0 [(dV extended, CSH (t+dt)−dV extended, CSH (t))(1−V real )+V real ,CSH⋅( ρ0 )
]
(3.23)
where k is the ratio of mass of alite reacting to the mass of C-S-H produced. The equation
now takes into account both the space occupied by other phases and the change of density of
C-S-H which is already present in the system.
G out t
Where: Extended Volume ( V extended ) =∫0 a BV⋅( 1−exp (−Af ) ) dy (3.24)
[ y2
2
Gout
2
r
2
t3r y 2 tr 2y 3
A f =π Idensity⋅Gpar ⋅( t − 2 )+Irate⋅Gpar ⋅( − 2 + 3 )
3 Gout 3Gout ] (3.25)
where, Gout (μm. hour-1) and Gpar are the outward and parallel growth rates of outer C-S-H, t r
(hour) is the age of the product, Irate (μm-2.hour-1) is the rate of nucleation per unit area of the
untransformed boundary and Idensity (μm-2) is the nucleation density of the product (number of
nuclei of product at the time = 0). Equation 3.25 can also be expressed using N rate and Ndensity
which are respectively the products of the nucleation rate and the nucleation density with the
Page Number: 74
square of the parallel growth rate (IrateGpar2 and IdensityGpar2). In this model, the parameters
Ndensity and Nrate are referred to as coefficients of nucleation density and nucleation rate
respectively. It should be stated here that the use of N density and Nrate in this study is simply to
convolute the Irate and Idensity parameters with Gpar to eliminate Gpar as the variable parameter.
The dependence of the density of C-S-H on time can be written as below:
(3.26)
(( )
−k den⋅t r
ρ( tr )=ρmax −( ρmax −ρmin )⋅exp
ρmax−ρmin )
where,
(tr = 0) & (y = 0) when (t < t0) (3.27)
and (tr = t – t0) when (t >=t0 ) (3.28)
where ρmax (gm. cm-3) is the final packing density of outer C-S-H, ρmin (gm. cm-3) is the initial
packing density of outer C-S-H, k den (gm. cm-3.hour-1) is the rate of densification of outer C-S-
H, aBV is the total surface area of alite powder per unit volume (μm -1) and t0 is the start time
parameter. In order to compute the values of aBV, the total specific surface area of the
particles aSSA (cm2/g), as measured from experimental techniques, were used as inputs and the
dimensions were transformed to (μm-1) using the density value of alite of 3.15 and the initial
w/c ratio.
While generating the heat evolution curves it was observed that a unique combination of the
fit parameters was not possible and similar curves could be obtained by modifying a
combination of the NDG parameters. The sensitivity of the parameters and their influence on
the kinetics are discussed in section 3.10.
The NDG kinetics presented above can be implemented using two different versions: local and
global. In the local version of the model all calculations are implemented on the scale of
individual particles whereas in the global version all calculations are implemented using the
overall surface area of the particles and overall volume of water. In this study, all simulations
were run using the global version on account of computation time, which is less than 10
minutes as opposed to the local version, which takes about 6 hours. The differences between
the local and global version are highlighted in Figure (3.13b)
Page Number: 75
Figure 3.13a: Diffuse growth of C-S-H as the microstructural volume as it densifies. Single
particle (top) and between particles (bottom)
Page Number: 76
3.10 Sensitivity of the NDG parameters
In order to illustrate the sensitivity of the NDG parameters, simulations were implemented
with a base value of the parameters as shown in Table (3.4). The parameters were then varied
individually while preserving the value of the other parameters to show the influence of the
variable on the overall kinetics. The simulated plots with variations of the parameters G par,
kden, ρmin, t0, Gout and Irate are shown in Figure (3.14). As can be seen, each parameter affects
the heat evolution profile in a unique fashion.
Table 3.4: Base values and short description of the parameters used for the simulations shown
in Figure (3.13).
Parameters and Base Values Description
Nucleation density ( Idensity) = 8.0 (µm-2) Number of nuclei of C-S-H per unit C3S
surface area at (time = t0)
Outward Growth rate (Gout) = 0.215 ( µm. hour-1) Outward Growth rate of the nuclei of
the product
Parallel Growth rate (Gpar) = 0.05 (µm. hour-1) Growth rate of the nuclei along the
surface
Nucleation rate (Irate) = 2.04 (µm-2 . hour-1) Rate of nucleation of C-S-H per unit C3S
surface area
Initial C-S-H density ( ρmin ) = 0.148 (gm. cm-3) Initial packing density of outer C-S-H.
Final C-S-H density ( ρmax ) = 2.10 (gm. cm-3) Final packing density of outer C-S-H.
Rate of densification ( kden ) = 0.0035 (gm. cm-3. Rate of densification of outer C-S-H
hour-1)
Base density of C-S-H (ρ0) = 2.10 (gm. cm-3) Density of Inner C-S-H
Starting time (t0) = 0.0 Time at which NDG kinetics begins
Page Number: 77
Figure 3.14: Sensitivity of the parameters ρmin, Gout, kden, Gpar, Irate and t0 in the NDG regime.
The variable parameter is indicated at the top of each figure.
Page Number: 78
is determined to best fit the measured calorimetry curve. The heat-flow rate obtained
from NDG kinetics is calculated and stored but not used to compute the overall
hydration rate until the SCD regime is terminated.
3. SCD regime is terminated when portlandite reaches a supersaturation value of 0.40.
As stated earlier, until this point the overall heat-flow rate is equal to the heat-flow
rate obtained from SCD kinetics.
4. Once portlandite precipitates, calcium and hydroxyl ions are simulated to decrease
from portlandite supersaturation value of 0.40 to portlandite solubility equilibrium
value of 0.00. This decrease in the concentrations is implemented in a single step (a
progressive decrease is not implemented). The concentrations of calcium and hydroxyl
ions at portlandite solubility equilibrium are calculated by simulating simultaneous
decrease of calcium and hydroxyl ions in a 1:2 ratio from their respective
supersaturated values (values at SIPortlandite = 0.40) until SIPortlandite decreases to 0.0.
5. Due to the decrease in concentrations, undersaturation of alite transitions back to the
high dissolution regime and the dissolution rate (which is calculated from SCD
kinetics) rises to high value (shown in Figure 3.15). The dissolution rate at this point
is computed in the model by calculating the undersaturation of alite with respect to
the pore-solution at portlandite solubility equilibrium (calcium, hydroxyl and silicate
ions at SIPortlandite = 0.0).
6. Since the NDG kinetics are implemented independently, the heat-flow rate calculated
from the NDG kinetics remains unaltered at the point of portlandite precipitation. As
can be seen in Figure (3.15), at this point the heat-flow rate from NDG kinetics is
lower that the heat-flow rate from SCD kinetics. NDG kinetics is allowed to continue
until the heat-flow rate equals the value of heat-flow rate at the end of the induction
period.
7. From the point of portlandite precipitation to the point at which the heat-flow rates
from NDG kinetics and SCD kinetics at the end of induction period equalize, the
overall heat-flow rate is not calculated. This can be seen as the gap in Figure (3.15).
8. Once (Heat-flow rate from NDG kinetics = Heat-flow rate from SCD kinetics at the
end of the simulated induction period), the overall heat-flow rate is calculated from
NDG kinetics.
Page Number: 79
Figure 3.15: Simulated evolution of heat flow using SCD, NDG and combinations of SCD
and NDG mechanisms. As can be seen, once portlandite precipitates, dissolution transitions
to the high-dissolution regime rendering NDG as the slower and rate determining process.
The switch from SCD to NDG mechanism is made when the heat flow rates from both
regimes equalize.
Page Number: 80
Figure 3.16: Flow-chart depicting the steps followed in the simulations to compute the
overall heat-flow using the combination of SCD and NDG kinetics.
This scheme of transition between the SCD and NDG regimes was chosen based on the idea
of the slower physical process being the rate determining process. If portlandite does not
precipitate, the undersaturation and, therefore, the dissolution rate would gradually decrease
to a near-zero value. Precipitation of portlandite causes the consumption of ions and places
the undersaturation and the dissolution rate in the “faster-dissolution regime” as can be seen
in Figures (3.10) and (3.15), while the rate of precipitation of hydrates (from NDG) remains
the slower process. Therefore, being the slower of the two simultaneous processes, the rate of
precipitation becomes the rate determining process. As a summary of these points, it could
also be said that beyond the end of the induction period, the systems comes to a state of
“dynamic equilibrium” where the rate of dissolution is regulated (supply) by the nucleation
and densifying growth of products (demand). The same theory is implemented in the
simulations and NDG kinetics, which is slower than the dissolution rate after the termination
of the induction period, is used to simulate the overall rate for stages III and onwards.
Page Number: 81
3.12 Determination of simulation parameters
Determination of simulations parameters for any system is conducted separately for the SCD
and the NDG regimes.
For the SCD regime, the calibrated dissolution parameters are used in addition to the input
parameters, which include: aSSA, initial pH, initial Ionic strength and initial calcium
concentration. The SCD parameters are then manually varied, if necessary, to obtain best fit
to the measured calorimetry profile. The SCD parameters which best match the length of the
induction period in the measured plot are set as the final values.
In the NDG regime, the number of the variable parameters is 6 and each of these parameters
affects the simulated heat-flow profile uniquely, as shown in Figure (3.14). For this regime,
the parameters for the reference system are initially set at the values used for a previous
system with similar aSSA value and the deviation is evaluated. Thereafter, the parameter or
parameters that best corresponds towards minimizing the deviation (as shown in Figure 3.14)
are perturbed until the difference between the measured and simulated plots are reduced to
10% for the majority of the hydration regime, as shown in Figure (3.17). The parameters are
then fine-tuned to obtain simulation profiles which remain within 5% difference bound with
respect to the measured profiles, as depicted in Figure (3.18).
Figure 3.17: Difference (in %) between the simulated and the measured calorimetry profiles
as a function of time for 3 NDG simulation variables indicated at the top. The grey region
represents the 10% difference bound.
Page Number: 82
Figure 3.18: Difference (in %) between the simulated and the measured calorimetry profiles
as a function of time as the NDG parameter G out varies. The grey region represents the 5%
difference bound.
Page Number: 83
Table 3.5: Input parameters for simulations shown in Figure (3.19) for systems from [39]. The
parameters represent the initial state of the system. The dissolution parameters used for these
simulations are shown in Table 3.3. The w/c for all systems is 2.0.
Solution pH Ionic Strength OH- concentration Ca concentration
(mol. L-1) (mol. L-1) (mol. L-1)
DI-water 7.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NaCl solution 6.98 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000
Ca(OH)2 solution 12.45 0.06333 0.0422 0.0211
NaOH solution 12.68 0.0408 0.0408 0.000
Page Number: 84
Figure 3.19: Simulated and measured evolutions of CaTotal concentration and Ca2+ in alite
systems with different initial states of pore solution. Once portlandite precipitates (marked by
circular symbols), the Ca2+ concentration and the SIPortlandite values decrease (schematically
shown by arrows) until portlandite solubility equilibrium is reached (indicated by the dotted
lines) data from [73].
Page Number: 85
Chapter 4: Studying the Effects of Process Parameters
In this chapter, the effects of various experimental process parameters on the hydration of
alite are described. The following sections discuss the influence of particle surface area, mixing
conditions, thermal treatment and additions of alkali hydroxides, alkali sulfates and gypsum
on the hydration of alite. Using the model and simulation techniques described in Chapter 2,
heat evolution curves of different alite-based systems are simulated to explore the way in
which the hydration mechanisms are affected by different process parameters.
The measured heat evolution profiles for all systems as obtained from isothermal calorimetry
are shown in Figure (4.2). Figure (4.3) shows the early age heat flow for the same systems. As
can be seen, in systems with lower specific surface area of particles (a) the heat evolved
during the induction period is lower (b) the induction period is longer causing a delay in the
start of the acceleration period (c) the upslope of the acceleration regime is lower (d) peak at
the maximum heat flow is lower.
Page Number: 86
Table 4.1: Median size, Specific surface area calculated from PSD measurements obtained
from Laser diffraction method, and density values of all alite gradations used in this section.
From [109].
Figure 4.1: Measured particle size distributions of all alite systems presented in this section.
Other details about the PSDs can be found in Table 4.1. From [109].
Page Number: 87
Figure 4.2: Measured heat evolution profiles of all alite systems presented in this section.
Other details about the PSDs can be found in Table (4.1).
Figure 4.3: Measured early age heat evolution profiles of all alite systems listed in Table
(4.1). From [109].
Page Number: 88
4.1.2 Simulating the effect of surface area
Simulations for these systems were implemented using the model as described in Chapter 3.
The dissolution parameters for all simulations were set at their calibrated values without any
alteration (listed in Chapter 3, Table 3.3). The NDG parameters were varied to obtain the
best fits and are listed in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Values of the NDG parameters used in the simulations for systems listed in Table
4.1. The units of each parameter are the same as described in section 3.9 (Chapter 3).
PSDs aSSA ρmin Irate Idensity Gpar Gout kden t0
Alite C2 2000 0.105 0.800 8.00 0.0500 0.260 0.0015 0.0
PSD 3 2393 0.097 1.680 8.00 0.0500 0.238 0.0020 0.0
PSD 5 3059 0.148 2.040 8.00 0.0500 0.215 0.0035 0.0
Alite-Batch B 2100 0.105 1.200 8.00 0.0500 0.250 0.0020 0.0
PSD 2 1212 0.073 0.615 8.00 0.0403 0.335 0.0010 0.0
The main parameter from the different PSDs which varies in the simulations is a SSA, which
has a direct impact on the rate of dissolution as described by Equation 3.8 (Chapter 3). The
measured and simulated heat evolution profiles at early ages are shown in Figure (4.4). Figure
(4.5) shows the calorimetry curves and the simulations up to 30 hours of hydration. It can be
seen that across the range of PSDs the simulation is able to well capture the slowdown in
reaction rate and the induction period with the same parameters for the dissolution kinetics.
Figure (4.6) shows the simulated evolution of Ca 2+ concentration and SIPortlandite in the pore
solution. As can be seen, the times at which SIPortlandite exceeds 0.40, the value set for critical
supersaturation, for the first time changes as PSD changes and these times are approximately
the same as the times at which the rate of reaction begins to accelerate in the measured
calorimetry plots.
Page Number: 89
Figure 4.4: Simulated and Measured heat flow rates for alite systems with different PSDs for
the first 5 hours. w/c ratio for these systems is 0.40 and the PSDs are indicated at the top of
each figure. In each plot, the solid black and dotted lines represent heat flow rates obtained
using the SCD and NDG mechanisms respectively. The termination points of the solid black
lines represents the end of the simulated induction period and precipitation of portlandite.
The full plots shown in Figure (4.5) are obtained by combining the heat flow rates obtained
from the two mechanisms.
Page Number: 90
Figure 4.5: Measured and simulated rate of heat released for alite systems up to 50 hours of
hydration. w/c ratio of all systems is 0.40. For the simulations, the calibrated values of SCD
parameters were used (shown in Table 3.3, Chapter 3) and the G out parameter of the NDG
kinetics was varied in addition to minor variations in the other parameters (shown in Table
4.2).
Page Number: 91
(a) (b)
Figure 4.6: Evolution of (a) Ca 2+ concentration (b) SIPortlandite. Once portlandite precipitates,
the Ca2+ concentration SIPortlandite values decrease (schematically shown by arrows) until
portlandite solubility equilibrium is reached (indicated by the dotted lines). In all systems,
w/c = 0.40.
The NDG parameters with the largest variations in the simulations are G out, which represents
the outward growth rate of C-S-H, and I rate, which is the rate of nucleation of C-S-H per unit
area. The variation in the rest of the parameters: ρ min and kden are 3.97 and 3.5 times
respectively in comparison to their lowest values. These parameters (ρmin and kden) increase
proportionally with respect to the specific surface area (Figure 4.7a and 4.7b) but the exact
nature of this relationship is not understood. It must also be stated here that the need to vary
four of the NDG parameters is unique to systems in which the surface area of alite particle
changes drastically. The number of variable parameters is reduced to 2 when simulations are
implemented for the same PSD while studying the variation of other process parameters such
as: effect of mixing conditions, effect of alkali salts, effect of heat treatment on alite etc. as
will be demonstrated in other sections.
The values of Irate were compared to the specific surface area of the particles as shown in
Figure (4.7c). It was observed that Irate increases with increasing specific surface area of the
particles. It appears that smaller particles have higher nucleation rates, even when normalized
Page Number: 92
with respect to the surface area. The exact reasons for this are unclear, although it may be
related to the fact that smaller particles have undergone more “grinding action” and so may
have a more highly damaged surface and curvature. It is also seen that C 3S has a lower
nucleation rate, again for reasons unclear at this stage.
The values of Gout were also compared to the average distance between closest neighboring
particles and the specific surface area of the particles as shown in Figure (4.8). The
calculation of the distance between closest neighbors was done using As can be seen, G out
decreases as the specific surface area of the particles increases (Figure 4.8a). Interestingly this
corresponds to an increase in direct proportion to the distance between the particles (Figure
4.8b). The variation of Gout with respect to the initial inter-particle space suggests an
opportunistic growth of the hydrates according to the available space in the microstructure,
the description of the exact mechanism is not known. It may, however, be speculated that this
variation is due to slight concentration gradients in the immediate vicinity of particles.
Page Number: 93
(a) (b)
Figure 4.8: Variation of the Outward growth rate (G out) in the model with respect to (a)
specific surface area of the PSD (b) Average distance between closest neighboring particles
(dclosest neighbours). The value of the dclosest neighbours was calculated at time = 0 by (1) Identifying the
closest neighbours for each particle through iterations over the entire system (2) Calculating
the distance between all closest neighbours in a set of 2 (3) Averaging the value of distance
over the number of calculations in step 2.
Page Number: 94
4.2 Effect of mixing conditions
Mixing is a crucial step for any concrete application. Poor mixing results in large
inhomogeneities, which reduces the workability, leads to a poor packing of cement particles,
increases overall porosity and reduces strength. High mixing rates, on the other hand, reduce
the length of the induction period and enhance the hydration process [114,115].
To highlight the effects of mixing on early age hydration and the evolution of the surface
defects during the dissolution of alite, Juilland used two kinds of solution: DI-water and
saturated lime solution. This was primarily done to alter the initial state of the pore-solution
and so the dissolution of alite began at different levels of undersaturation; high in the case of
DI-water and low in the case of saturated lime solution. To keep the complexity of the
systems to a minimum, for all experimental measurements the same w/c ratio (0.40) was
used. The PSD of the alite used for hydration in DI-water and saturated lime solution have
specific surface area values of 1300 and 1900 cm2/g respectively.
Figure (4.9a) shows the heat evolution profiles of alite hydrating in DI-water prepared at 6
different mixing rates, ranging from hand mixing to 2000 rpm. As can be seen, the heat
evolution profiles are significantly altered as the mixing rate changes. The kinetic effects
observed in the calorimetry measurements that vary directly with the speed of mixing are (a)
slow down of the dissolution rate during stage 1 is slightly altered (b) heat flow during the
induction period is higher (c) length of the induction period is shorter (d) the upslope of the
acceleration period is higher (e) the duration of the main peak occurs is shorter.
Figure (4.9b) shows the heat evolution profiles of alite hydrating in saturated lime solution
prepared at 4 mixing rates ranging from hand mixing to 1600 rpm. As can be seen, the mixing
conditions do not significantly affect the heat flow during the first two stages. The changes in
Page Number: 95
the latter stages, however, are more pronounced and are summarized here: (a) upslope of the
acceleration regime is higher at higher mixing rates (b) intensity of the main heat-peak is
enhanced when the speed of mixing is high. These effects are similar to the ones observed for
alite hydration in DI-water.
(a)
Page Number: 96
(b)
Figure 4.9: Measured heat evolution profiles of alite hydration in (a)DI-water (b) Saturated
lime solution (left)up to 30 hours (right) up to 5 hours. From[115].
Simulations for alite hydration in DI-water under different mixing conditions are shown in
Figure 4.10 ((a) for early ages and (b) for the hydration up to 30 hours) with comparisons
against the measured rate of heat evolution.
To capture the effects of mixing it was necessary to vary the values of the SCD parameters
kdiss and cstep retreat. Amongst the NDG parameters, the nucleation density coefficient (N density)
was varied within the widest range with small variations in the t 0 and ρmin parameters. As
described in section 3.9 of Chapter 3, N density is equal to (Idensity. Gpar2), where Idensity and Gpar are
the nucleation density and parallel growth rate respectively. The SCD and NDG parameters
used are listed in Table 4.3.
Page Number: 97
Table 4.3: SCD and NDG parameters used for the simulations of alite hydrating in DI-water
at different mixing conditions. The units of parameters are the same as described in section
3.9. The other input parameters used for these simulations were w/c ratio and a SSA equal to
0.40 and 1300 cm2/g respectively.
NDG parameters SCD parameters
Mixing ρmin NRate Ndensity Gout kden t0 kdiss cstep βmax
speed retreat
Hand 0.255 0.006 0.0110 0.215 0.0025 0.7 8.0 3.2 10-22
500 0.255 0.006 0.0115 0.215 0.0025 0.7 10.0 3.3 10-22
915 0.300 0.006 0.0170 0.215 0.0025 0.6 14.0 3.5 10-22
1350 0.310 0.006 0.0210 0.215 0.0025 0.40 20.0 3.8 10-22
1600 0.340 0.006 0.0240 0.215 0.0025 0.40 24.0 4.6 10-22
2000 0.360 0.006 0.0270 0.215 0.0025 0.40 26.0 4.8 10-22
Page Number: 98
Figure 4.10(a): Measured and simulated early age heat evolution profiles for alite systems in
DI-water at different mixing rates. The mixing rates are indicated on top of each plot.
Parameters shown in Table 4.3 were used in the simulation in addition to the input
parameters which included aSSA and w/c ratio equal to 1300 cm2/g and 0.40 respectively.
Page Number: 99
Figure 4.10(b): Measured and simulated rate of heat evolution for alite systems in DI-water at
different mixing rates. The mixing rates are indicated on top of each plot. Parameters shown
in Table 4.3 were used in the simulation in addition to the input parameters which included
aSSA and w/c ratio equal to 1300 cm2/g and 0.40 respectively.
Similar to simulations described earlier, for the simulations of the heat evolution profiles of
alite hydrating in saturated lime solution, variations in SCD and NDG parameters were
needed (shown in Table 4.4).
Table 4.4: SCD and NDG parameters used for the simulations of alite hydrating in saturated
lime solution at different mixing conditions. The units of the parameters are the same as
described in section 3.9. The other input parameters used for these simulations were w/c
ratio, aSSA, initial calcium concentration and initial pH equal to 0.40, 1900 cm 2/g, 22 mmol. L-1
and 12.45 respectively.
NDG parameters SCD parameters
Mixing ρmin NRate Ndensity Gout kden t0 kdiss cstep βmax
speed retreat
Hand 0.167 0.006 0.014 0.237 0.0025 -1.0 24.0 3.80 10-22
500 0.170 0.006 0.015 0.237 0.0025 -1.3 24.0 4.25 10-22
800 0.175 0.006 0.017 0.237 0.0025 -1.3 24.0 4.45 10-22
1600 0.208 0.006 0.022 0.237 0.0025 -0.7 24.0 4.60 10-22
(a) (b)
Figure 4.12: Variation in the SCD parameters (a) k diss and (b) cstep retreat. The round and
rectangular symbols represent the values used for alite systems in DI-water and saturated lime
solution respectively. For saturated lime solution, kdiss was not varied but the points are shown
in the plot to show the relative difference with respect to values for DI-water at equivalent
mixing rates.
The increase in the kdiss parameter captures the increase in dissolution rate. This increase
would correspnd to the effect the removal of the ions from the surface by the mixing process.
With a higher value of k diss, faster dissolution kinetics are observed. It should be noted that
the dissolution equation as implemented in the model does not explicitly represent the process
of removal of ions but provides a simple mathematical description of the dissolution kinetics.
The increase in the cstep retreat with the mixing rate implies a higher density of steps at higher
mixing rates. It could be hypothesized that at higher mixing rates, more etch pits open up
during the undersaturation regime. These pits later evolve to steps.
In the simulations with saturated lime solution, the SCD parameter k diss was kept constant
(Figure 4.12 and Table 4.4). As can be seen in Figure (4.13), in the presence of additional
CaTotal ions and a higher initial pH value, the initial undersaturation of alite is much lower as
compared to DI-water. As a result of this, dissolution begins from very close to the step
retreat regime. This is reflected in these simulations, which are relatively insensitive to the
value of kdiss chosen, as the system spends so little time in this regime. However, as the system
moves to the step retreat regime, the mixing rate imparts a small influence on the dissolution
rate. This is reflected in the c step retreat parameter, which was observed to rise slightly with the
mixing rate. This variation in cstep retreat was also found for hydration of alite in DI-water.
The evolution of calcium ions in solution in the two cases is shown in Figure (4.14). For the
DI-water systems it is clear that the first part of the curve is steep, corresponding to the fast
dissolution regime with the formation of etch pits. This part of the curve is clearly very
(a) (b)
2+
Figure 4.14: Simulated evolution of Ca concentration in (a) DI-water (b) Saturated lime
solution. Once portlandite precipitates, the concentrations decrease (indicated schematically
by arrows) from portlandite supersaturation value (shown by the thin grey line) towards
portlandite solubility equilibrium (shown as the thick dotted black line).
From these experiments and simulations, it is clear that the overall rate of dissolution up to
the end of the induction period is limited by two different processes. At the start, when mixed
with pure water the anhydrous phase quickly dissolves with the formation of etch pits at high
undersaturation, the concentration at the interface quickly approaches the critical
concentration at which the surface reactions will slow down. However, when the initial
solution is already saturated with lime, the systems enter quickly into the of step retreat
regime and is not significantly affected by mixing (see Figures 4.9b and 4.13).
Figure (4.15) shows the variation of the N density parameter for the systems mixed with DI-
water and those mixed with saturated lime solutions. In contrast to the regime prior to the
induction period, the effects of mixing speed are the same in the two systems and it is clear
that mixing speed significantly increases the number of nuclei of hydrates in the system. The
increase in nucleation density for both DI-water and saturated lime solutions is proportional
and almost linear with respect to the mixing rate.
The increase in nucleation density of hydrates is likely to be a purely mechanical effect. C-S-H
precipitates (mainly on the surface of the alite grains), very quickly after the addition of
water. During mixing these “nuclei” are dislodged from the surface forming extra nucleation
sites away from the surfaces of the alite particles. The microstructures of the different systems
(Figures 4.16) support this hypothesis as it is clear that there is much more growth of C-S-H
between the cement grains when the mixing speed is increased.
It was shown that the model can reproduce the influence of the mixing conditions on
hydration kinetics by varying the simulation parameters (a) k diss and cstep retreat, which are
related to the ease at which species detach from the dissolving surface of alite, and (d) N density,
which is related to the number of C-S-H nuclei per unit surface area of the particles.
Experimental results confirm the increase in the nucleation density of hydrates as a higher
packing density of C-S-H in the microstructural matrix is observed for samples prepared at
higher mixing rates.
Three different batches of alite were synthesized with the same composition but different
specific surface areas: 2000 cm2/g, 2100 cm2/g and 3100 cm2/g. These are referred to as
batches A, B and C respectively in the order of increasing specific surface area values. The
PSDs as measured using Laser diffraction are shown in Figure (4.17).
Heat treatment of alite and C3S were carried out at two different temperatures: 6500C and
8500C and for 3 different durations: 10 minutes, 1 hour and 6 hours. Quenching in air was
used as the cooling method post heat-treatment.
As can be seen, heat treatment of alite and C 3S influences the hydration kinetics, particularly
in stages I and II. The effects as a function of the duration of treatment and temperature of
treatment are identical, as summarized below:
1. Heat flow during stage 1 remains unaltered
2. Heat flow rate during the induction period is lowered
3. Length of induction period is lengthened
4. Acceleration and deceleration profiles are altered. In some cases, a higher heat-peak is
observed and in some cases the heat-peak intensity is lowered.
As shown in Table (4.5), in order to fit the early age hydration profiles of heat treated alite
and C3S, the cstep retreat parameter was varied from the calibrated value (shown in Table 3.3,
Chapter 3) while preserving the values of the other two SCD parameters. When plotted
against the duration of heat treatment, a progressive decrease in c step retreat was observed (shown
in Figure 4.22a). For the same duration of treatment, a higher decrease in c step retreat parameter
with respect to the temperature of treatment was observed. Also, for the same durations and
temperatures of treatment, the values of c step retreat for C3S and alite were found to be similar.
The trend suggests a decrease in the density of step-retreat defects on the surface of alite and
C3S as the duration and time of heat treatment increases. It should be noted here that a
decrease in the density of step-retreat defects would imply a decrease in the density of etch-
pits during stage I for hydration. However, in the simulations the k diss parameter was not
varied because the simulation results were found to best fit the measured curves with the
calibrated value. This is expected because the fist stage of hydration lasts only for a fraction
of an hour and the kinetics during this regime are controlled by the solution composition
(undersaturation), which is the same for all systems presented in this section.
SCD
NDG parameters
parameters
Batch Temp. Time ρmin NRate Ndensity Gout kden t0 kdiss cstep βmax
retreat
C3S - - 0.690 0.020 0.100 0.175 0.005 2.3 24.0 4.60 10-22
C3S 650 10 min 0.685 0.020 0.110 0.175 0.005 0.8 24.0 2.50 10-22
C3S 650 1 hour 0.715 0.020 0.130 0.175 0.005 2.0 24.0 2.00 10-22
C3S 650 6 hours 0.715 0.020 0.160 0.175 0.005 4.5 24.0 1.20 10-22
C3S 850 1 hour 0.710 0.020 0.150 0.175 0.005 3.0 24.0 1.60 10-22
Alite-A - - 0.075 0.003 0.026 0.25 0.0015 0.3 24.0 4.60 10-22
Alite-A 850 1 hour 0.087 0.003 0.018 0.25 0.0015 9.5 24.0 0.80 10-22
Alite-A 850 6 hours 0.080 0.003 0.026 0.25 0.0015 10.2 24.0 0.78 10-22
Alite-B - - 0.100 0.003 0.020 0.25 0.0022 0.0 24.0 4.60 10-22
Alite-B 650 10 min 0.145 0.003 0.015 0.25 0.0022 1.5 24.0 2.50 10-22
Alite-B 650 1 hour 0.136 0.003 0.013 0.25 0.0022 1.7 24.0 2.0 10-22
Alite-B 650 6 hours 0.185 0.003 0.025 0.25 0.0022 3.5 24.0 1.50 10-22
Alite-C - - 0.250 0.003 0.020 0.22 0.0057 1.3 24.0 4.60 10-22
Alite-C 650 1 hour 0.380 0.003 0.009 0.22 0.0057 1.0 24.0 1.60 10-22
Alite Batch A
Alite Batch B
Alite Batch C
Figure 4.20: Early age measured and simulated heat evolution profiles of alite and C 3S
hydrating in DI-water.
Alite Batch A
Alite Batch B
Alite Batch C
Figure 4.21: Measured and simulated heat evolution profiles of alite and C 3S hydrating in DI-
water.
(a) (b)
Figure 4.22: (a) Variation in c step retreat as a function of duration of heat treatment (b) Calcium
concentration profiles of heat treated C 3S samples. As portlandite precipitates, the calcium
concentration drops (indicated by the arrow) from the supersaturated value of 0.40 (shown by
the dotted line) to portlandite solubility equilibrium (shown by the solid line).
The other variable NDG parameter was N density, which is related to the number of C-S-H
nuclei per unit surface area of the anhydrous alite particles. When plotted against the
duration of heat treatment, no distinct trend was found (shown in Figure 4.23). In the case of
C3S, Ndensity showed an increase whereas in the case of alite, the value of N density remained fairly
constant with respect to increasing durations of treatment. On the whole, this variation
suggests an alteration in the nucleation criterion and growth of C-S-H due to the heat-
treatment process but with no straight forward relationship with the duration or temperature
of treatment. It should also be noted that the values of N density are higher for C 3S as compared
to the values for alite. This difference can be attributed to the high reactivity of C 3S, as a
result of its high specific surface area.
It is shown that the impact of heat treatment on the hydration of C 3S and alite can be
explained by the model. Due to a lower value of step-retreat density on the surface of alite
particles, dissolution occurs slowly and the time to reach portlandite supersaturation
increases, thus lengthening the induction period. The conclusions from this study provide
insights into the role of surface defects on the dissolution of alite and corroborate the
hypothesis proposed by Juilland et al. [117].
4.4.1 Introduction
Past research indicates that alkalis enhance hydration of alite reactions (assessed using
isothermal calorimetry), leading to an increase in the rate and magnitude of heat release
during the acceleration regime (Stage III), a shorter time to the main (2 nd) heat peak and
rapid deceleration beyond the main heat peak [119,120,121,122]. It has been reported that
while alkali additions enhance the degree of reaction at short times scales (first few days), at
longer time scales (28 days) the degree of hydration is similar [118].
Acceleration by alkalis has been attributed to the rate of dissolution and precipitation of the
reactant/product phases in relation to the chemistry of the contacting solution (i.e., the Ca 2+,
Na+, K+, Si4+, OH- abundance) and the common-ion effect [123,124,125,126,127] or alterations
in the composition/morphology of the hydration products [128,129,130,131]. However most of
the studies conducted in the past have been qualitative in nature.
Figure 4.24: Particle size distribution of the two batches of alite as measured using Laser
diffraction. Data from C. Gianocca[118]
Table 4.6: The compositions of mixing water utilized in the evaluations and their calculated
pH.
Concentration pH of NaOH salt solution pH of KOH salt solution
0.1 M 13.10 13.08
0.2 M 13.34 13.33
0.5 M 13.71 13.68
Table 4.7: NDG parameters used to simulate hydration of alite from batches A and B in DI-
water. The units of each parameter are the same as described in 3.9 (Chapter 3). In addition
to this, the input parameters were w/c ratio (0.35 for both batches) and a SSA (1923 and 2760
cm2/g for batches B and A respectively).
Figure (4.27) shows the measured heat evolution profiles of alite hydrating in mixing solutions
with different compositions. Figure (4.27b) shows the early age heat evolution profiles of alite
hydrating in varying compositions of mixing water. Here, it is clearly noted that the
dissolution (heat release) response of alite varies according to the composition of the mixing
water. This results in heat-evolution profiles (Figure 4.27a) to produce a combination of
effects including:
• Alterations in hydration kinetics during stages I and II
• An increase the rate of heat release during the acceleration regime
• Increase in the intensity of the 2nd (main) heat peak
• Rapid deceleration
As can be seen in Figure (4.27c), alkali additions enhance the degree of reaction at short times
scales (up to 15 hours or so) but at longer time scales (beyond 18 hours), the degree of
hydration is lower as compared to the reference. However, at high levels of alkali additions
(between 0.2M and 0.5M), the degree of hydration at later ages remains higher than the
reference. These differences in the degree of hydration between the systems were found to be
in agreement with the portlandite contents evaluated using Thermal Gravimetric Analyses
(TGA) performed at 30 hours (Figure 4.28).
Here it is critical to note that inspite of similar mixing water parameters (pH, ionic strength),
isomolar compositions of NaOH and KOH induce slight differences in the alite hydration (heat
release) response. A combination of these effects ensures that alite systems containing NaOH
or KOH at early ages hydrate faster, wherein the increase in rate is proportional to the initial
concentration of salt in the mixing solution.
Here, it is noted, that an increase the mixing solution pH and initial ionic strength, results in
a rightward shift of the “initial undersaturation level” and a faster transition of dissolution
kinetics from the fast “undersaturation regime” to the slow “step-retreat regime”. In addition
to this, it can also be observed that there is a reduction in the level of Ca 2+ required to
invoke portlandite precipitation, which corresponds to the termination of the induction period.
As a combination of these effects, it can be said that:
• Due to low initial undersaturation, the system transitions from the fast to slow
dissolution regime rapidly. Consequently, the kinetics remain in the slow-dissolution
regime for longer duration rendering the release of Ca2+ concentration at a slower rate.
• Precipitation of portlandite is invoked at lower level of Ca 2+ concentration. This is
because at high pH values, the concentration and, hence, the activity of OH - ions is
higher as compared to the reference system. The activity of calcium ions to precipitate
SI
It should be noted that all the simulation profiles were obtained using calibrated SCD
parameters shown in Table 3.3 (Chapter 3).
Table 4.8: Input parameters for simulations of systems described in this study. The
parameters represent the initial state of the system. The dissolution parameters used for these
simulations are shown in Table 3.3. w/c ratio for all systems is 0.35. The values of a SSA used
for batches A and B are 2760 and 1923 cm2/g respectively.
Solution pH Ionic Strength Alkali concentration OH- concentration
(mol. L-1) (mol. L-1) (mol. L-1)
DI-water 7.00 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 M NaOH 13.10 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.1 M KOH 13.10 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.2 M NaOH 13.35 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.2 M KOH 13.35 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.5 M NaOH 13.69 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5 M KOH 13.69 0.5 0.5 0.5
Using the calibrated dissolution parameters (shown in Table 3.3, Chapter 3) and input
parameters shown in Table (4.8), early age hydration profiles were simulated for alite (Batch
A) hydrating in mixing solutions with different compositions. Comparisons against
experimental results are shown in Figure (4.32). The time of portlandite precipitation
indicated in Figure (4.31) and the end of the induction period in Figure (4.32) are identical as
they are results from the same simulations. As can be seen, the model captured reasonably
well the onset of the induction period. However, the time at which portlandite precipitates is
not captured well. It should be noted here that for isomolar concentrations of NaOH and
KOH, as the input and dissolution parameters are the same, the simulated dissolution profiles
are also identical.
As discussed earlier, simulations for all systems were implemented using calibrated dissolution
parameters. However, for the simulations of the NDG regime, variations in the Ndensity and ρmin
parameters were required. As can be seen in Table (4.9), the variation in the ρ min parameter is
small (from 0.245 to 0.350) and the exact correlation of this variable with respect to a
physical process or parameter is not known at this stage. A constant negative value of the t 0
parameter (-0.30) was used for all systems and this suggests that the precipitation of hydrates
occurs very early in these systems. It should be noted that the value of t 0 was set at -0.3 as
opposed to 0.0 to improve the fit.
Amongst the NDG parameters, the widest variation in found in the N density parameter. The
values of this parameter when plotted against the initial ionic strength of the mixing solution,
an increase in direct proportion (shown in Figure 4.34) was observed. This trend suggests an
increase in the number of C-S-H nuclei per unit surface area of anhydrous alite leading to a
denser matrix of hydrates in systems with higher initial pH.
In order to corroborate the increase in C-S-H nucleation density, SEM images obtained at the
age of 30 hours (Figure 4.35) were analyzed. With the limited resolution of this technique, the
differences in the packing of hydrates between the images are not distinguishable. However,
through close observation it can be seen that the density of the C-S-H matrix is higher for the
0.2 M NaOH mixing solution, indicating a higher number of C-S-H nuclei as compared to the
reference sample resulting in denser packing of the hydrates around the alite grains. It should
be noted that a higher nucleation density C-S-H leads to faster hydration of alite at early
ages, as shown in Figure (4.27c) and the denser packing of hydrates observed in Figure (4.35)
could simply be a result of enhanced hydration.
It has been hypothesized that the growth of C-S-H is kinetically limited by the very low
concentration of silicate in solution and as this concentration rises facilitating the onset of
rapid growth, as previously proposed in [133]. As can be seen in Figures (4.30c) and (4.31c),
the rise in Si concentration is more pronounced when the initial pH is higher. This could
result in a enhanced nucleation and growth of the C-S-H phase. However, this hypothesis is
fairly speculative at this stage.
Figure 4.36: EDS analyses for alite samples hydrated in mixing solutions of different
compositions at the age of 30 hours. Data from C. Patapy[113].
For further verification, C/S and H/S ratios for C-S-H were calculated using data from
calorimetry and QXRD (for reacted SiO2) and Thermogravimetric analyses (for C-S-H bound
water content), as shown in Figure (4.37), for alite samples at the age of 30 hours. It was
observed that the differences in the C/S and H/S ratios were minor confirming no major
change in the C-S-H stoichiometry.
To examine the morphological changes in C-S-H, fracture surface images were taken at 11 and
20 hours (shown in Figure 4.38). From the images it was concluded that the morphology of C-
S-H was not affected significantly by the addition of alkali salts in the mixing solution.
It has been shown that hydration profiles of alite in mixing solutions with different
compositions can be captured by the use of calibrated dissolution parameters and varying two
of the NDG parameters. The variation in the N density parameter in the simulations, the
experimental results from calorimetry and SEM, showed a progressive increase in the
nucleation density of C-S-H as a function of the initial ionic strength of the pore-solution. It
was also shown that the addition of alkalis in the mixing solution does not influence the
structure and morphology of the hydrates significantly. However, as can be seen in Figure
(4.33), the matches between the simulation and measured heat flow profiles during the
deceleration regimes are not good. This could be a result of the assumption that C-S-H only
grows as layers on alite particles, while in reality C-S-H could also nucleate in the pore-space
thus affecting the impingements and evolution of the exposed surface area.
In order to monitor the kinetics, heat evolution profiles were generated for C 3S and alite
hydrating in DI-water with three different substitution levels of gypsum: 2%, 5% and 10%.
For comparison, the profiles for reference systems were also obtained and are described in the
next section.
For simulations of the early age hydration profiles, calibrated SCD parameters (Table 3.3)
were used for the reference samples. For the samples with gypsum substitution, the critical
undersaturation parameter (βmax) was varied with respect to the calibrated value. The reason
for choosing βmax as the variable parameter is described later. Three of the NDG parameters,
Ndensity, t0 and ρmin, were also varied with respect to the best-fit values determined for the
reference samples to fit the heat flow rates for the post-induction period regime. The values
ultimately determined to best fit the hydration profiles, shown in Figure 4.40 ((a) for early
ages and (b) for full hydration plots up to 30 hours), are enumerated in Table (4.10).
C3S 0.790 0.020 0.090 0.16 0.005 1.6 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
C3S +2%G 0.830 0.020 0.160 0.16 0.005 3.6 24.0 4.6 10-22.43
C3S +5%G 0.690 0.020 0.240 0.16 0.005 4.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.43
C3S +10%G 0.690 0.020 0.240 0.16 0.005 4.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.43
Alite 0.130 0.003 0.031 0.235 0.002 0.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
Alite + 2%G 0.255 0.003 0.071 0.235 0.002 1.6 24.0 4.6 10-22.35
Alite + 5%G 0.275 0.003 0.120 0.235 0.002 2.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.35
Alite + 10%G 0.263 0.003 0.095 0.235 0.002 2.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.35
As shown in Table (4.10), for the simulations, two of the SCD parameters (k diss and cstep retreat)
were kept at their calibrated values and the parameter βmax was varied by the same magnitude
(see Table 4.10) irrespective of gypsum substitution so as to best fit the heat flow rate until
the end of the induction period. Since the amount of dissolved gypsum is the same in all
substituted systems, as stated earlier, the initial state of pore-solution is also the same and,
hence, the variation needed in βmax were also identical. Consequently, the simulated SCD
regimes for all systems also are identical (see Figure 4.40a).
Due to this variation in βmax, in addition to the change in the initial concentrations of calcium
and sulfate, the evolution of concentration of the ionic species differ from the reference. Figure
(4.41a) shows the evolution of the calcium, silicate and sulfate concentrations for the reference
and gypsum substituted samples. As can be seen in the gypsum substituted samples, calcium
The simulated pore-solution concentrations presented in this section are in good agreement
with experimental data reported by Brown et al.[113]. In their study, the authors presented
pore-solution concentrations of total calcium and sulfate ions in solution when C 3S is hydrated
in a 0.0158 M CaSO4 solution, which showed (a) increase in the level of calcium concentration
at the point of portlandite precipitation (b) lengthening of the induction period as compared
to C3S hydrating in DI-water and saturated lime solution (shown in Figures 4.41c).
It can be hypothesized that in the presence of sulfate ions in the pore-solution, the evolution
of defects on the surface is altered; either due to sorption of sulfate ions on alite surface or
inhibition of defect sites on alite surface. As a result of this, the critical undersaturation
(given by βmax ), below which it is not possible to create new etch pits, is altered. However,
this hypothesis is fairly speculative at this stage and requires further investigation.
As shown in Table (4.10), amongst the NDG parameters, N density, t0 and ρmin were varied. The
values of the t0 parameter suggest an increase in direct proportion with respect to the increase
in gypsum addition. This variation indicates a delay in the start of nucleation and growth of
C-S-H in the presence of gypsum, as can also be seen in Figure (4.40a) which indicate a delay
in the time of portlandite precipitation (and, hence, the end of the induction period) in
systems with gypsum additions.
Amongst the other NDG parameters, the widest variation was found in N density. This
parameter is related to the nucleation density of C-S-H that form as layers on the alite
particles. When plotted against the replacement percentage of gypsum, a trend emerged
(shown in Figure 4.42) which suggests that the nucleation density of C-S-H increases up to an
optimum level of substitution by gypsum. Beyond this level, the nucleation density decreases
From the trend observed in Figure (4.42), it appears that the hydration and strength
development are enhanced up to an optimum level of gypsum replacement (5% or more in our
study). Replacements beyond the optimum level lead to decrease in the hydration rate and,
hence, the development of strength.
Figure 4.42: Variation in Ndensity with respect to levels of gypsum replacement. Values for
both C3S and alite systems are included.
4.6.1 Introduction
Past research indicates that alkali sulfate salts enhance the hydration of alite by a faster
acceleration, higher heat-peak (main peak) and faster deceleration[111,110]. Similar to
addition of alkali hydroxide salts, alkali sulfate salts are reported to enhance the degree of
reaction at short times scales (first few hours), at longer time scales (3 days or so) the degree
of hydration is noted to be similar or decreased with respect to the reference system.
Alite pastes were prepared at a constant water-to-solids ratio (w/s) of 0.35. The solids were
combined with de-ionized water or the appropriate salt (Na 2SO4, K2SO4; AR-grade) solution
and mixed using a high-shear immersion mixer for 2 minutes at a mixing speed of 500 rpm.
Here, care was taken to minimize exposure of the mixtures to the air to limit the potential for
carbonation. The compositions of “mixing water” (solutions) used are detailed in Table (4.11).
In addition to these effects, it should also be noted that for the same dosage of salt, there are
differences in the hydration profiles between the systems with Na 2SO4 and K2SO4 salts
additions. Minor differences in overall degree of hydration can be observed in systems with
the same concentration of salt but of different types (K+ or Na+) as shown in Figure (4.43c).
As the initial ionic-strength of the solution changes, the corresponding alteration in the
dissolution profile also changes the evolution of concentration of the ions. Figure (4.45) shows
the evolution of Ca2+, pH and SiTotal as obtained from simulations for systems with Na 2SO4
salts in the mixing solution. Measured values at different times are also shown in the plots. In
the simulated plots, the points at which the Ca concentrations reach a maximum and Si
reaches a minimum, represent the first precipitation of portlandite (shown by the circular
symbol) and the end of the simulated induction period. As the decrease in sulfate species
continues, the pH continues to rise as can be seen in the simulated and measured plots.
Beyond this, the concentrations stabilize at the simulated levels of portlandite solubility
equilibrium, indicated using dotted lines in each plot.
DI-water 0.280 0.004 0.035 0.23 0.003 -0.3 24.0 4.60 10-22
0.1 M 0.255 0.004 0.055 0.23 0.003 -1.2 24.0 4.60 10-22.1
Na2SO4
0.1 M 0.240 0.004 0.055 0.23 0.003 -1.2 24.0 4.60 10-22.1
K2SO4
0.2 M 0.420 0.004 0.160 0.23 0.003 1.0 24.0 4.60 10-22.30
Na2SO4
0.2 M 0.420 0.004 0.160 0.23 0.003 1.0 24.0 4.60 10-22.30
Na2SO4
0.5 M 0.580 0.004 0.220 0.23 0.003 2.0 24.0 4.60 10-22.45
Na2SO4
0.5 M 0.470 0.004 0.220 0.23 0.003 1.0 24.0 4.60 10-22.45
K2SO4
Figure (4.46) shows the comparison between the simulated and measured heat evolution
profiles at early ages. As can be seen, the dissolution profiles and the nature of the induction
period (initiation point, length and termination point) changes with respect to the dosage of
salt addition in the mixing solution.
Figure (4.47) shows the full heat evolution profiles for all systems. Reasonably good fits were
obtained for all systems using the same simulation techniques as used for other systems. For
the simulations, the nucleation density parameter (N density) was varied in addition to
adjustments in ρmin and t0 parameters.
Figure 4.48: Variation in the SCD parameter βmax (log scale) with respect to the initial ionic-
strength of the alkali sulfate addition in the mixing solution. As can be seen, the critical
undersaturation of alite decreases progressively as the initial ionic-strength increases.
As shown in Table (4.13), for the simulations of the NDG regimes of the systems presented in
this section, the Ndensity parameter needed to be varied in addition to minor variations in ρmin
and t0. The variation of the ρmin parameter and its correlation to a physical variable is not
understood at this point. The variation in the t 0 parameter, on the other hand, reflects the
Figure (4.49) shows the variation of the N density parameter against the initial ionic-strength of
the alkali sulfate salt. As can be seen, the nucleation density of hydrates increases
proportionally with respect to the initial dosage of alkali sulfate in the pore-solution. This
trend is similar to the trend described for systems with alkali hydroxide salts addition in the
mixing solution in section 4.4 (Figure 4.34). The increase in the nucleation density was also
visually observed in SEM images (shown in Figure 4.50) obtained for samples with different
initial salt dosages at the age of 30 hours. As can be seen in Figure (4.50), the packing of the
product is denser in the samples with salt additions as compared to the reference indicating a
greater nucleation density of the product.
Figure 4.49: Variation in the NDG parameter Ndensity with respect to the initial ionic-strength
of the alkali sulfate addition in the mixing solution. As can be seen, the nucleation density of
hydrates increases progressively as the initial ionic-strength increases.
(b)
(c)
At the point of portlandite precipitaiton (end of the simulated induction period), calcium and
hydroxyl ions are consumed in a single time-step to let the saturation index of portlandite
drop from 0.40 to 0.0. However, in experimental results [137] it is observed that this drop in
concentrations is progressive and continues for a few hours, as can be seen in Figure (5.1). If
the consumption of calcium and hydroxyl ions is simulated using a progressive decrease from
portlandite supersaturation to portlandite solubility equilibrium, the transition between the
two regimes can be modeled without a gap. In order to illustrate this a simple fit function,
shown in Equation (5.1) according to observations of pore-solution concentration data from
literature [137] and experiments (Figures 4.24 and 4.45) is used.
r Ca ( t−tprecipitaton ) (5.1)
Ca( t)=Caeq +(Ca SS−Ca eq ). exp( )
(Ca SS−Ca eq )
where, Ca(t) is the concentration of total Ca, Ca eq is the total calcium concentration at
portlandite solubility equilibrium, CaSS is the value of calcium concentration at portlandite
supersaturation of 0.40, t is the time, tprecipitation is the time at which portlandite precipitates
and rCa is a fit constant that depends on a SSA and w/c ratio. Figure (5.2) shows the simulated
evolution of calcium concentrations and the resulting heat-evolution profiles. The heat evolved
is calculated using Equation (3.4), as described in Chapter 3, which takes into account the
increase in dissolution of alite (exothermic) due to increase in undersaturation and heat
consumed as portlandite precipitates (endothermic) and ions are consumed. Using this
criterion, the bump at the end of the induction period can be reproduced (shown in Figure
5.2b).
Figure (5.3) shows the heat-evolution profiles of a alite (90%)-aluminate 7 (10%) system with
3.5% of gypsum for different w/c ratios. As can be seen, at higher w/c ratios, the first
acceleration continues until a higher peak (marked by A 1) is reached. Similar behavior can
also be observed for the growth of the monosulfate phase (marked by A 2). This difference in
the reaction rate profiles can be explained as a manifestation of difference in the available
space in the different systems. In the presence of extra space in the high w/c ratio systems,
the reaction rate continues for longer durations resulting in a higher and delayed main peaks.
As the available space is still higher at the time of formation of monosulfate, the second peak
(A2) is also distinctly more intense in the high w/c ratio systems.
Figure 5.3: Measured heat evolution profiles of alite (90%)- aluminate (10%) system with
3.5% of gypsum at different w/c ratios. The w/c ratios are indicated in the legends. from
[138]
7 aluminate = C3A
Table 5.1: NDG parameters used for simulations of alite hydration at different w/c ratios.
The simulated results are shown in Figure (5.4).
(a) (b)
Figure 5.4: Simulated heat evolution profiles of alite in DI-water at different w/c ratios. All
NDG parameters for these systems, except for w/c ratio, were the same and are shown in
Table (5.1).
(a) (b)
Figure 5.5: Measured heat evolution profiles of ordinary portland cement in DI-water at
different w/c ratios (a) from E. Berodier (b) from H. Chen
dρ ρ −ρ (5.2)
=k den⋅ max
dt ρmax −ρmin
n
dρ
dt
=k den⋅
( ρmax −ρ
ρmax−ρmin ) (5.3)
Figure 5.6: Simulated heat evolution profiles of alite in DI-water using different values of n in
Equation (6.2). In all simulations, the same NDG parameters were used.
In all simulations presented in this study, C-S-H grows as concentric rings. However, other
growth criteria such as fibrous growth and branching dendrite-growth (demonstrated in
Figure 5.7) are expected to affect the impingements between solid phases and evolution of the
exposed surface area with time. Consequently, the reaction rates are subject to change. In the
future, the growth criteria of C-S-H should also be studied to highlight the influence of
morphology of C-S-H on hydration kinetics. As our knowledge of structure and morphology of
C-S-H is improving, “plugins” can be developed in the model to replicate the observations and
implement them to study the hydration kinetics.
6.1 Introduction
In this chapter, simulations for model C 3A (aluminate) + gypsum (C$H2) systems are
described. The chapter also includes preliminary simulations for multi-phase systems, which
are implemented by unifying concepts and approaches from simulations of model alite and
aluminate systems. Perspectives and suggestions for simulating hydration of the model
aluminate systems are discussed.
Equation (6.1) represents the reaction during the first stage where the product that forms is
ettringite. The formation of ettringite begins in the first few minutes and continues until
gypsum is exhausted [145,146,147]. Beyond this, ettringite is consumed and formation of
monosulfate begins. As such, the duration of formation of ettringite depends on the gypsum
content. This sequence of reactions and formation of products is very well illustrated in a
recent work by A. Quennoz [145] conducted on C3A+gypsum systems and shown in Figures
(6.1), which shows the heat evolution profiles, and Figure (6.2), which shows the phase
assemblage.
One question during the hydration of these systems in the first stage is the reason for the
rapid slow down of the initial reaction, as seen in the left extrema of Figure (6.1). Minard et
The two stages of hydration of C 3A are numerically handled by two separate mechanisms in
the model. The following sections describe the implementation of the two mechanisms in the
model.
dmC A 3
(6.3)
=−k 2⋅a SA (t)
dt
where,
where, k1(cm. hour-1) and k2(g. hour-1. cm-2) are rate constants and r0,i (cm) is the initial radius
of the particle i. Of these parameters, k1 and k2 are calibration parameters and r0,i is used as
an input from the particle size distribution (size versus cumulative volume percentage). The
other input parameters for these simulations are composition of the C 3A+Gypsum system and
w/s ratio. The heat of hydration for this stage is set at 866 kJ/g [148]. It should be noted that
these simulations are carried out analytically without the use or generation of digital
microstructures.
Figure (6.4) shows the simulation results for the first stage for reaction for 3 different batches:
A (aSSA = 3050 cm2/g), B (aSSA = 4360 cm2/g) and C (aSSA = 4600 cm2/g). The set of
parameters used for these simulations are listed in Table 6.1.
As can be seen in Figure (6.4), the results from the simulations provide satisfactory
reproduction of the heat-evolution profiles. The simulation results fit the measured hydration
profiles very well at later stages but poorly before approximately 5 hours. This discrepancy in
the simulations at early ages could be a result of lack of descriptions of gypsum and aluminate
dissolution, which affect the hydration profiles for the first few hours.
The values of k1 and k2, as listed in Table (6.1), show that the same rate law can be
generically used to describe the hydration of C 3A+gypsum systems in the first stage. For
batches B and C, irrespective of the composition, the parameters were identical and could be
used as calibrated constants. For batch A, the values of k 1 and k2 were both halved compared
to batches B and C. This difference in the values could be a result of changes in the intrinsic
reactivities between the batches or large difference in the specific surface area values between
batches A and B/C. In order to evaluate the precise calibrated values of k1 and k2, simulations
for more systems are intended to be implemented in the future.
G out t
Extended Volume ( V extended )=∫0 a BV⋅( 1−exp (−A f ) ) dy ` (6.7)
[
A f =π Ndensity⋅(t2r −
y2
2
Gout
)+N rate⋅(
t3r y 2 tr 2y 3
− +
3 G 2out 3G3out
)
] (6.8)
where Ndensity (hour-2) and Nrate (hour-3) are coefficients of nucleation density and nucleation rate
respectively. Ndensity and Nrate can also be written as (Idensity. Gpar2) and (Irate. Gpar2), where Idensity
is the number of nuclei of product per unit area, I rate is the rate of nucleation of product per
unit area and Gpar is the parallel growth rate. The parameter a BV is the boundary area per
unit volume of water, the value of which is used as an input while taking into account the
area of C3A particles at the start of monosulfate formation and amount of water (space) left
in the system. This set of equations include 4 NG parameters (N rate, Gout, tmonosulfate formation, and
Ndensity) that influence the hydration profiles uniquely. The sensitivity of these parameters with
respect to baseline values (shown in Table 6.2) are illustrated in Figure (6.5).
Figure 6.5: Sensitivity of boundary NG parameters: N rate, Ndensity, tmonosulfate formation and Gout. Only
the parameters listed on the top of each figure were changed while keeping the other
parameters at their baseline values as listed in Table (6.2).
Using this mechanism, simulations were implemented for reaction in the second stage. As
such, two of the NG parameters: G out and tmonosulfate formation were varied while the others were
retained at identical values. The value of N density was set at 0.0 and Nrate was set at 5.0,
implying that monosulfate continues to nucleate as hydration progresses. The comparison of
simulation results against experimental results are shown in Figure (6.6). The boundary NG
parameters used are listed in Table (6.3).
As can be seen in Figure (6.6), the overall hydration kinetics can be captured reasonably well
using the boundary NG kinetics. The acceleration and the main heat-peak can be well
reproduced but the deceleration for some systems does not fit the experimental values very
well. This could be due to a change in the driving mechanism from standard boundary NG to
some other mechanism at high volumes of monosulfate around the C 3A grains. Modifications
in the boundary NG kinetics also need to be incorporated if the monosulfate phase densifies
with time, like C-S-H. These concepts will be further examined and implemented in the model
in the future.
time at which gypsum exhausts in the systems calculated using both experimental and
simulated heat evolution profiles (Figure 6.7). These calculations were carried out using the
scheme described below:
1. Using the measured/simulated calorimetry profile to compute the degree of hydration
until the second stage of reaction
2. Evaluation of amount of ettringite formed from the degree of hydration calculations
3. Calculating the corresponding gypsum consumption to form ettringite
4. Computing the time to exhaust gypsum, considering the initial amount in the system
As can be seen, the simulation time values at which monosulfate begins to form corresponds
very well to the time at which there is no solid gypsum in the system. Thereby, it can be said
that ettringite is the only product that forms in the first stage of reaction and monosulfate
begins forming when gypsum is all consumed.
Larger amounts of ettringite forms in systems with higher gypsum contents. This leads to
space-constraint for monosulfate to grow and this is reflected in the G out parameter, which is
lower for systems with higher gypsum contents and vice-versa. In order to further corroborate
this, porosity (or space in the microstructural volume) left in the systems at the time of AFm
peaks were calculated and plotted against the growth rate values (shown in Figure 6.8). As
stated earlier, it can be seen that Gout increases as space available in the system increases.
This trend is similar to the trend observed for alite-based systems, as described in section 4.1,
Chapter 4. It should also be noted that while batches B and C follow the same trend, batch A
has lower values. Deviation in batch A compared to batches B/C were also observed in the
first stage of reaction, as described in section 6.3.1. This could be due to differences in
intrinsic reactivities or large difference in specific surface values between batches A and B/C.
For validation, heat-evolution profiles of three alite-aluminate-gypsum based systems from the
work of A. Quennoz and commercial systems from the study of V. Kocaba were used
[145,149]. The three alite-aluminate-gypsum systems vary in compositions and initial phase
assemblage: Batch A (Polyphase; Alite(90%)-Aluminate(8%)-Gypsum(2%)), Batch B
(Monophase; Alite(90%)-Aluminate(6.5%)-Gypsum(3.5%)) and Batch C (Polyphase;
Alite(88%)-Aluminate(7.8%)-Gypsum(4.2%)). The three commercial systems are:
• White cement (Alite(68.1%)-Belite(23.6%)-Aluminate(6.3%)-Ferrite(1.9%)-
Gypsum(3.5%))[207],
• Ordinary Portland Cement B (Alite(62.6%)-Belite(17.6%)-Aluminate(6.1%)-
Ferrite(7.5%)-Gypsum(4.4%))[207], and
• Ordinary Portland Cement C (Alite(68.2%)-Belite(13.5%)-Aluminate(3.6%)-
Ferrite(8.8%)-Gypsum(3.7%)))[207].
For the simulations, the hydration of the alite was simulated using the combination of SCD
and NDG mechanisms as described in Chapters 3 and 4. The hydration of C 3A was simulated
using the mechanisms described in previous sections. The hydration of belite and ferrite was
not taken in account assuming that these phase do not hydrate to a large extent in the first 3
days[149]. The parameters used for simulations are listed in Tables (6.4) (aluminate hydration
kinetics) and Table (6.5) (alite hydration kinetics). In addition to these parameters, w/c ratio
and aSSA are used as input parameters for the simulations. For the hydration of alite and
aluminate, the aSSA values are computed using the equations below:
where, f represent the mass fraction of the respective phases. The results obtained from
simulations are shown with the measured heat-evolution profiles in Figure (6.9). Figure (6.9a)
shows the heat-evolution rates as obtained from alite and aluminate hydration separately and
Figure (6.9b) shows the overall heat-flow rate obtained by combining the heat evolved from
the hydration of alite and aluminate phases. As can be seen, the simulation results are in good
agreement with the experimental results.
Alite-aluminate-gypsum systems
A 0.125 7.59. 10-7 1.6 0.0 1.93 0.70
B 0.125 7.59. 10-7 1.6 0.0 14.00 0.04
C 0.125 7.59. 10-7 1.6 0.0 11.00 0.02
Commercial systems
White Cement 0.125 7.59. 10-7 1.6 0.0 25.00 0.0030
OPC B 0.125 7.59. 10-7 1.6 0.0 11.00 0.0065
OPC C 0.125 7.59. 10-7 1.6 0.0 23.00 0.0050
Table 6.5: SCD and NDG parameters used to simulate alite hydration kinetics. The units of
all parameter are the same as described in examples in Chapter 4.
Alite-aluminate-gypsum systems
A 0.135 0.01 0.035 0.150 0.0030 2.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
B 0.135 0.01 0.035 0.250 0.0030 0.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
C 0.135 0.01 0.035 0.350 0.0030 0.0 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
Commercial systems
White cement 0.260 0.05 0.100 0.160 0.0011 -1.70 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
OPC B 0.270 0.05 0.100 0.120 0.0011 0.70 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
OPC C 0.270 0.05 0.100 0.092 0.0011 -1.70 24.0 4.6 10-22.00
(a) (b)
Figure 6.10: Variation of the monosulfate growth rate against porosity at the time of AFm
peak for (a) multi-phase systems (b) all model and multi-phase systems presented in this
chapter.
The values of the C-S-H growth rate (G out) parameter ranged from 0.092 to 0.35. When
plotted against the surface area of particles (using the area directly from the PSD
measurements and Equation 6.11), a progressive decrease in G out was observed (Figure 6.11).
The same trend was observed in the alite/C 3S model systems (also shown in Figure 6.11).
This suggests that the speed of growth of C-S-H is higher when the particles are coarser and
the initial dispersion between the particles is more, as described in section 4.1, Chapter 4. It
should also be noted that values of the C-S-H growth rate are lower in the multi-phase
systems as compared to the model systems. Lower growth rates in the multi-phase systems
were also observed for the monosulfate phase, as described earlier. This suggests that the
hydration of both alite and aluminate phases are inhibited due to interactions with each
other.
In the following sections some of the important numerical and scientific advancements made
in this study are described. Perspectives for simulating hydration in complex systems are also
discussed.
In order to describe the temporal progress of hydration of more complex systems, it is also
important to incorporate hydration of the belite phase. As such, it is critical to study
hydration of belite both individually and in the presence of alite. Combining mechanisms and
concepts from these individual phases, a model can be developed to simulate hydration of
commercial and more-complex systems.
Education
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland (2008 - 2012)
• Doctor of Philosophy in Materials Science and Engineering
• Graduate Advisor: Professor Karen L. Scrivener
• Dissertation Title: Modeling hydration kinetics of cementitous systems
Research Experience
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland (2012)
• Ph.D student in Materials Science and Engineering
• Studying the influence of various process parameters on the hydration of alite : salt-
solutions, inert fillers, particle sizes, mixing and water content
• Simulation of hydration of aluminate-gypsum systems studying the effect of composition
particle sizes and water content
• Development of a 3D microstructural model to study the microstructural evolution of
hydrating cement paste
Skills
Computing
• Programming in C++
• Programming in Java
• Linux, MacOSX and Windows
Laboratory Techniques
• Electron Microscopy
• X-Ray diffraction
• Dynamic Vapor Sorption
• Isothermal Conduction Calorimetry
• Thermo-gravimatric analyses
Publications
• A. Kumar, S.Bishnoi and K. L. Scrivener, Modelling early age hydration kinetics of alite,
Accepted for publication in Cement and Concrete Research, 2010
• P. Juilland, A. Kumar, E. Gallucci, and K.L. Scrivener, Effect of mixing on early hydration
of cementitous systems, Accepted for publication in Cement and Concrete Research, 2011
• A. Kumar and K. L. Scrivener, Modelling hydration kinetics of multi-phase cementitous
systems, CONMOD 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland
• A. Kumar and K. L. Scrivener, Modelling hydration kinetics of multi-phase cementitous
systems, ICCC 2011, Madrid, Spain
• A. Kumar and K. L. Scrivener, Modelling hydration kinetics of multi-component
cementitous systems, Cement and Concrete Science 2010, Birmingham, U.K
• A. Kumar, G. Sant and K. L. Scrivener, Modelling water vapor isotherms of cementitous
materials using a microstructural model, CONMOD 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland
• A. Kumar, G. Sant, C. Patapy, C. Giannocca and K.L Scrivener, Modelling the effect of
sulfate salts addition on alite hydration, In progress for submission in Cement and Concrete
Research
• A. Kumar, G. Sant, C. Patapy, C. Giannocca and K.L Scrivener, Modelling the effect of
alkali hydroxides addition on alite hydration, In progress for submission in Cement and
Concrete research