fons for Yor Haryana Assistany Di i trict Xamination aoeney (Pre, tity the punishment which aon under the category i retgnments in the Indian Penal Coda, (a) Death i Imprisonment forlife simple imprisonment with hard labour p Forfeiture ‘of property “actus non facit reum nis! mens A) Prohibited act constitutes an offence {B) Guilty intention of accused constitutes, anoffence Neither guilty intention alone nor the prohibited act alone constitutes an offence rohibited act followe: suil oP d act followed by guilty intention constitutes an offence 4, When a criminal act is done by several Inention of ll (A) Each of such person is liable for that act in thesame manner as ifit were done by him alone : ®) Bach of such person is liable for his own overtact : (© Each of such person shall be gabe according to the extent of hi participation in the crime (D) Both (B) & (C) ae: 4, Consider the following stateme! i The actus reus is made up © @ Human action. which isusually as conduct Q) The result of such ai circumstances whit (A) (1) only (8) @)only © Both (1) and (2) (©) Neither (1)nor (2) ons in furtherance of the common Detention thar ee Msg 07, way 0X, and that ne Tay be: nats ound in that Offence of "OHH. Anes commas (4) Cheating ®) False re -presentat © Theft = a, 9 Babricating false evidence Which a a o of the following statement is (A) al Abelmentofanotfence isanincomplete @®) Abetment of an offences acontinuing offence (© Abetment of an offence is a complete offence (D) Abetment of an offence is an offence depending upon circumstances of the case 7. ‘A’entereda house to commit thet ld lady living inthe house saw the thet and shouted for help. Neighbors collected neerthe house and caughtholdofhe thet wowastnyng The neighbors gave | beatings Sith tet andlathis, Theneighborsee tae for: (A) Similar pee (Common in iB Unlawful assembly i \1314 Singhal’s—Judicial Service Examing we in ie when Is an arrested person er fai Th iprorme Courtorindta hes suc Soney 14. titled t the punishment of death when ® prisoner Yhadvocate of his choice? © meet 20 he sentence (A) During interrogation fer whilo under tl (B) Afterintersogation ‘commits murdk for life inthe case of (A) Mithu Singh v. State of Punjab (© Throughout interrogation (B) Raghubirv- State of Haryana (D) Allthe above are correct (© Bacchan Singh v. State: ‘of Punjab 45. Where shall the State Government, (D) Maru Ram v. State ‘of Punjab a police control room? C8tabligh, jar intention was (A) Inevery district 40. Commonintention ind simile distinguished in the famous: (B) AtStatelevel (A) Barendra Kumar Ghosh v: Emperor (© AtPanchayat lever 2 {B) Mehboob Shah v. Emperor (D) Only (A) and (B) are correct (© KripalSingh v.State oe 46. Any private person may arrest an (©) Rishidev Pandey v-State of UP ane: Y Berton 11. The plea of sudden and grave provocation case: (A) Commits nor-bailable offence in his under section 300 Exception (1) of the Indian presence Penal Code is a: i # (B) Commits non-bailable offence ang | cognizable offence in his a (A) Question of Law tion of F (8) Question of Fact (© Commits compoundable offence inhis (© Mixed question of Law and Fact (D) Presumption under Law Ee i (D) Commits non-bailable and cognizable 12. Preparation and Attempt are two stages for offence in his presence or is c a commission of an offence. Prey So Seaie Ths fonsoe or pee raking preparation not punishable Is: 17. Every warrant of arrest shall remain in force (A) Lackofrelationship between prepara (yy ioatndiaisntice: (A) Itis executed (8 Poosbilty of ed tacies (8) Cancelled by court which issued it commission of the offence (© Itexpires on its own (© Absence ofintention (©) Only (1) and @) are correct | 4 (D) Absence of attempt 18. Whocan record confessions and statements Carefully eed Jollowdng sinlemn ents: under section 164 of Code of Criminal | Aawap hasten atetanres!. ae \ Code, requirement is of two persons, (A) Any Executive Magistrate or whereas pi Section 149 of IPC, @ Metropolitan Magistrate requirements of five persons. : ) Any Metropolitan Magistrate or Judi : 1 fe or ui @ Acconiing inecion SHI oman Magistrate irrespective i his ne required whereas under jurisdiction mn 149 IPC, common object is © Any District Magistrate ne a : Sect Bie eee RiNer amine pedi n° Bote of the Information as to nom a pe Section 149 of IPC cognizable cases, a police officer Is Which of the above statements i a (and (3) ® i ® Eee aan (and : | })and (2) (D) (2)and (4) (© Arrest the accused = | o ao information in his diary i ‘informant to the Magistrat? 4qFERS LAO LNStri, fal itt Attornty (ire 20. Any police officer makin, - ae 8° Investigation (A) Record confessi, accused Snst statement of (8) Record statementof wi tn (© Compel attendance a acquainted with f.-,Petsons Circumstances of acase "and (D) Both (AYand (B) arecorrect 21, Police report under the Cri Code of 1973 is: ee (A) Areportmade to the police @) Report of police officer on completion of investigation sent to a competent Magistrate (© Apreliminary report (D) Anad-hoc report 22, First Information Reportis not a substantive evidence, it can be used during trial for the following: (A) Only to corroborate the evidence of the informant (®) Only to contradict the evidence of the informant (© Forboth (A) and (B) above (D) For neither (A) nor (B) 23, Point out most accurate answer: .C. who among Under Section 125(4) of Cr.P. the following cannot claim maintenance: (A) Only a wife living in adultery Only a wfeliving separately by mutal consent (© Both (A) and (B) are correct (©) Neither (noo aot cai of ale - See for the a ae Coes Court prior t its oecution! oe San ‘Section oO a daring waieh evioone? ie mination, 201g he isu naximuy 5 Chiet Juemu™ Sentence li ot ) 3 yeaa Magistrat Prisonment a ‘years ‘ecanimpose ign” 9 10 years ») 7 years *d question of aw and ©) Question of fact = fact question of law depending on the facts oY circumstances 8. Which one of the , Matched: following is not correctly (a) Reference to High Court — Section 395 ®) High Court’s Power of Revision — Section 401 (© Abatement of Appeal—Section 393 (©) Appeals from conviction—Section 374 29. Indian Evidence Act wes drafted by: (A) Lord Macaulay @) SirJamesF Stephen (© Huxley (©) SirD.E Mulla 30. Law of Evidenceis: (B) Lexfori ; (© Lex loci solutionis (0D) Lexsitus ‘Whether in erimina proceedings the previous x Wea ehareter ofan acused perso IS relevant: