Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
“Those of you who have read the book Cradle to Cradle will be familiar with its
message: that true sustainability has to be designed into the products and processes
we use and depend on from day to day – anything less will simply mean that the
plunder of resources and the despoiling of our planet with often toxic waste will
proceed at a slightly slower pace.
If we look at the ‘emerging market’ economies over the past several decades – South
Korea and Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, China, Indonesia, and more recently
India and Brazil especially - common to all their experiences of economic
‘modernization’, by which we usually mean industrialization, has been the same
failure to address long-term environmental and resource issues that has been
apparent in Western Europe and North America over the past two centuries.”
The story of China’s engagement with the international economy and its
extraordinary rise as a major force in the world since 1980 is well-known. Less well-
known, however, is the more recent rise to priority status of environmental concerns
in the policy deliberations of the Communist Party, concurrent with a move in the
economy to higher technology, and an increase in domestic R and D.
Just fifteen years ago, the focus was on economic development at any environmental
cost. At that time, with a university colleague I visited a major steel plant in Beijing –
some of you may know of it – whose contribution to atmospheric, water and soil
pollution in the city was all too visible. The plant was old-fashioned and enormous,
with 80,000 workers and their 45,000 dependants all living on the site. The Research
Director there rejected our questions about the environment out of hand, saying that
the environmental lobby was a capitalist front organization seeking to undermine
China’s industrial progress; no doubt foreign multinational corporations would have
been quite surprised at this interpretation!
In 2007 at its major Party Congress in October the Communist Party created a new
Ministry for Environment Protection, and named the environment as one of its top
priorities for the first time ever.
So, is there scope for the Cradle to Cradle message in China? Yes, absolutely.
Certain factors make it likely that Cradle to Cradle would be received and examined
with great interest.
• Most of the largest corporations in China are still state-owned, and many of
those which are apparently private are still subject to state influence and
guidance; the government’s ability to decide on a policy, and then carry it out,
makes China significantly different from other emerging markets
• Chinese corporations are busy globalizing, and are aware of the need to
comply with norms and standards overseas
• Despite all of this, in its recent past, in the years before 1980, China had a
very substantial record of accomplishment in the recycling of products, making
shoes out of old rubber tyres, tools out of scrap metal, and fertilizer out of
human waste; the concept of multiple sequential use is well understood in
China, and a part of its own tradition
NOW is the time, therefore, to be pressing the sustainable design message of Cradle
to Cradle.
So how would one go about promoting the Cradle to Cradle philosophy in China?
Because of the complex part-market, part-command nature of the economy I would
suggest that an approach which focuses only on the corporate sector is not enough.
What is required is a ‘three-pronged’ approach, through which you engage first with
central government, secondly with universities or research units interested in
technology for sustainable development, and thirdly with Chinese companies, both
state-owned and private.
So how typical is China of other emerging markets? The answer may be ‘not very’,
because of its political system, its hybrid economy, its enormous scale, and its
growing concern over the environment. Yet because of its size, it is especially
important that the Cradle to Cradle message reaches China. If China can address its
own issues of environmental pollution, sustainable development and the recycling of
resources effectively, the world as a whole will have taken a major leap forward in
addressing these matters.
Oh, and finally, with respect to the steel plant I mentioned – it is no longer a problem.
Nearly ten years ago the central government ordered the heavily polluting plant to
move, lock, stock and barrel, two hundred kilometres northeast of Beijing and set up
again, using new, less polluting, technology. The Research Director has now retired.
Where there is a will, there can be a way.